Zknamcx
Zknamcx
Zknamcx
Molino Campus
COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY
A Thesis
Presented to the Faculty of College of Accountancy
UNIVERSITY OF PERPETUAL HELP SYSTEM DALTA-MOLINO
CAMPUS
Molino 3, Bacoor, 4102, Cavite
By:
DECEMBER 2016
1
Recommendation Sheet
Researchers: Dominic Jasper C. Ambona
Ria Lorraine Caparas
Fredgielyn Lacson
Vivianne Realce
College:
Accountancy
Title:
Recommending Approval:
Adviser
Date
Chairperson
Date
Member
Date
Member
Date
Approved by:
_______________________
Adviser
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
Approved by the COMMITTEE ON PRE-ORAL EXAMINATION with a
grade of ____ on December , 2016
____________________
Chairperson
____________________
___________________
Member
Member
________________
_______
Dean, College of
Accountancy
RESEARCHERS
ADVISER
SCHOOL
Molino Campus
DEGREE CONFERRED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE.............................................................................................................
1
RECOMMENDATION SHEET................................................................................
2
APPROVAL SHEET..................................................................................................
3
ACKNOWLEDGMENT............................................................................................
4
ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................
6
LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................
8
LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................
8
LIST OF APPENDICES............................................................................................
9
CHAPTER
1
10
Review of Related Literature.............................................................
11
6
Research Methodology
Research Design.................................................................................
34
Respondents of the Study...................................................................
34
Research Instruments.........................................................................
34
Data and Gathering Procedure...........................................................
35
Sampling Techniques.........................................................................
36
Statistical Treatment of Data..............................................................
37
7
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 1 Conceptual Paradigm(IPO)
..26
Fig. 2 Frequency Distribution of Respondents by Type of Business......................
42
Fig. 3 Frequency Distribution of Respondents by Capital......................................
44
Fig. 4 Frequency Distribution of Respondents by Years of Operation.....................
46
Fig. 5 Frequency Distribution of Respondents Number of Employees..................
48
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1Scaling for the factors affecting tax compliance cost by small medium
enterprises operating in City.....................................................................................
39
Table 2Scaling for the factors affecting tax compliance level of agreement by
small medium enterprises operating in City............................................................
40
Table 3 Distribution of Respondents by Type of Business......................................
42
10
APPENDICES
Appendix ADescriptive Statistics for Perceived Tax Compliance..........................
68
Appendix BProfile of the Respondents as to Type of Business...............................
71
Appendix CProfile of the Respondents as to Capital..............................................
72
Appendix DYears of Operation of Respondents.......................................................
73
Appendix ENumber of Employees of Respondents.................................................
74
Appendix FANOVA for Perceived Tax Compliance and Type of Business.............
76
Appendix GANOVA for Perceived Tax Compliance and Capital............................
77
Appendix HPearson r for Perceived Tax Compliance and Years of Operation.....
78
Appendix I Pearson r for Perceived Tax Compliance and Number of
Employees..................................................................................................................
79
Appendix J Sample Questionnaire...........................................................................
80
Appendix K Letter of Request..................................................................................
82
11
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
AND STUDIES
Introduction
Most large companies have their roots in Small and Medium
Enterprises suggesting that the future large corporations are the Small
and Medium Enterprises of today that must be nurtured to ensure their
growth.SMEs are generally perceived to be the nursing for indigenous
entrepreneurship which will result into growth of small investments. It
is a well-known fact that the revenue generated from the taxation of
individuals and businesses is an important source of income for
government. In an economy such as ours, that is struggling to remain
afloat, it is even more important. Tax revenue is the source of funds
used for developmental projects such as provision of infrastructural
facilities such as good roads, stable power supply, stable water supply
etc. All of which combine to create an enabling environment for
12
organization
is
charged
with
significant
roles.Tax
13
14
and/or
services,
whether
single
in industry,
proprietorship,
15
growth
and
productivity,
including
credit
constraints,
16
Tax credits are available for taxes and duties paid on purchases
of raw materials of products for export, domestic capital
materials.
National and local tax exemption.
Tax rebate for the purchase of domestic capital good.
2. Indirect Tax
Under the Investment Priority Plan (IPP), SME owners shall be eligible
for the following incentives.
-
and fees.
Additional deduction for labor expense (ADLE).
17
municipalities nationwide
Establishment of a Start-up Fund for MSMEs to be sourced from
Foreign Literature
Tax compliance is a persons act of filing their tax returns,
declaring all taxable income accurately, and disbursing all payable taxes
within the stipulated period without having to wait for follow-up actions
from the authority. Tax Compliance in pure administrational terms
therefore includes registering or informing tax authorities of status as a
taxpayer, submitting a tax return every year (if required) and following
the required payment time frames. In contrast, the wider perspective of
tax compliance requires a degree of honesty, adequate tax knowledge
and capability to use this knowledge, timeliness, accuracy, and adequate
records in order to complete the tax returns and associated tax
documentation (Mohd et al, .2011). The wider perspective of
compliance becomes a major issue in a self-assessment system since the
total amount of tax payable is highly dependent on the levels of tax
18
19
21
24
25
27
29
Definition of Terms
Compromise.It is a deal between different parties that each party gives
up something what is demand.
Constraint. It is something that controls the limits or restricts actions.
Fines and Penalties.A fine or penalty is money paid usually to a
government authority, as a punishment for a crime or other offence.
Medium Enterprises.An enterprise with 100-199 Employees
Policy. It is a method and principles that guide and determine the
present and future outcomes or decisions.
Regulations.A general concept and official rule of the authority that
how should be done.
Small Enterprises.An enterprise with 10-99 Employees
Small and Medium Enterprises.Those entities with full-time
employees not exceeding 199 or asset size not exceeding Php 100
million.
Tax.A compulsory financial contribution imposed by a government to
raise revenue, levied on the income or property of persons or
organizations, on the production costs or sales prices of goods and
services, etc.
Tax Administration.It refers to the procedures attached to tax
compliance including registration and filling of returns.
Tax Attitude.The way of thinking or feeling about taxes.
Tax Avoidance.Refers to the legal reduction in tax liabilities by
practices that take the full advantage of the tax code, such as income
splitting and postponement of taxes.
31
Chapter 2
METHODOLOGY
This chapter discusses the methodology of the study on the Assessment
of Factors Affecting Tax Compliance bySelected Small and Medium
Enterprises in Molino 3, Bacoor City, Cavite. It aims to define and discuss in
detail the methods of gathering and analyzing data of the study. Specifically, it
includes research design, data-gathering procedure and statistical treatment of
data.
Research Design
32
9.
34
15
2
1+(15 0.1 )
Using the Slovins formula, the number of the sample size is computed.
The margin of error is the amount that is allowed for in case of miscalculation
or change of circumstances. Substituting the variables with the actual numbers,
the sample size is thirteen point zero-four (13.04) which is estimated to thirteen
(13) registered SMEs.
The smallest margin of error is 1% while the largest is 10%. In this
study, the margin of error of 10% will be used that made the sample size
relatively small. This is because the research locale Molino 3, Bacoor City,
Cavite is huge that conducting a survey to a larger sample size would not be
feasible and would be tedious enough for the conduct and completion of the
study.
Statistical Treatment of Data
Raw data collection will be gathered from the questionnaires given. The
answers given will be tabulated and interpreted to answer the particular
statements of the problem. In this study, the researchers will make use of the
Likert Scale. It is the most widely-used research method to analyze the
responses in the survey questionnaire. The scale was a 5-7-point scale which
was developed by Likert in 1932 to measure the attitude by asking respondents
a series of statements about a topic, in terms of the magnitude of the
respondents agreement with the given. The scale measures levels of
agreement/disagreement (Bowling, 1997). In this study, the answers that would
be gathered in the questionnaires measure the level of significance of each of
the factors that affect tax compliance of the selected SMEs.
In the first part SMEs profile the researchers will calculate the
percentage of each information of the SME. The second part Factors that
affect tax compliance the researchers will be using the Mean and Standard
Deviation. The third part significant difference of tax compliance in terms of
35
Percentage Formula:
x
p= x 100
n
Where:
x= given quantity
n= total amount
p= percentage quantity compared to the total
( X X )
N
Where:
S= standard deviation of a sample.
means sum of
36
R =c R xx c
T
Where c
1
is the transpose of c, and R xx is the inverse of the matrix
Range
Descriptive Rating
Verbal Interpretation
This means that the
4. 21 5.00
Very High
3.41 4.20
High
2.61 3.40
Neutral
1.81 2.60
1.0 1.80
Low
Very Low
Table 2
Scaling for the factors affecting tax compliance level of agreement by small
medium enterprises operating in Molino 3, Bacoor City
Range
Descriptive Rating
Verbal Interpretation
This means that the
respondents perceived level
4. 21 5.00
Strongly Agree
3.41 4.20
Agree
2.61 3.40
Neutral
1.81 2.60
Disagree
1.0 1.80
Strongly Disagree
38
CHAPTER 3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter of the research study provides the researchers analysis of
the data and its corresponding interpretations. Results in this chapter are made
available using table and texts presentations.
1. Profile of the respondents
1.1Type of Business
Table 3
Distribution of Respondents by Type of Business
Type of Business
Frequency
Percentage
Manufacturing
3
23.08
Metalcraft
2
15.38
Refilling Station
1
7.69
Bakeshop
3
23.08
General Merchandise
4
30.77
Total
13
100.0
Table 3 shows the distribution of respondents as to type of business.
There were 3 under manufacturing (23.08%), 2 were under metalcraft
(15.38%), 1 were under refilling station (7.69%), 3 were under bakeshop
(23.08%) and 4 under general merchandise (30.77%).
39
Type of Business
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Frequency
Type of Business
40
Capital
Frequency
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Amount of Capital
41
Years of service
3.5
3
2.5
2
Frequency
1.5
1
0.5
0
Years of service
Frequency
Percent
3
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
13
23.07
15.39
15.39
7.69
7.69
7.69
15.39
7.69
100.0
42
Number of Employees
Frequency
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Axis Title
Indicators
Mean
On time filing of tax return
3.92
On time payment of taxes with right 4.15
Sd
0.729
0.662
Z
0.109
-0.232
Percentile
54.364
40.807
amount
Total
0.115
-0.304
38.056
3.73
43
%Rank
1
2
item
falls
below
the
0.109
standard
deviation
above
the
Assessment
on
Factors
Affecting
Tax
Percentil
%Rank
3
1
2
Compliance
a. Assessed Compliance Cost
Table 8
Assessed Compliance Cost of Respondents
Indicators
Mean
Sd
3.38
3.31
0.923
0.910
0.672
0.758
e
74.912
77.585
3.53
0.634
0.741
77.075
Total
3.41
0.092
6.413
100
44
Mean
2.62
2.77
Sd
1.077
0.890
Z
1.281
1.382
Percentile
89.996
91.652
%Rank
3
2
2.54
1.009
1.447
92.605
2.64
0.095
14.316
100
savings
due
to
not
Table 9 shows the respondents assessed fines and penalties in terms of the
following indicators. Overall, 100 percent of the respondents who assessed the
fines and penalties falls below the 14.316 standard deviation above the
standard/benchmark (4 = Agree). The highest percent rank item is Penalties
(Surcharge, Interest, and Compromise) is lower than tax savings due to not
complying with tax laws with 92.605 percent of the respondents who
answered this item falls below the 1.447 standard deviation above the
standard/benchmark (4 = Agree). The least percent rank item is Penalty rates
are very low with a 89.996 percent of the respondents who answered this item
falls below the -1.281 standard deviation above the standard/benchmark (4 =
Agree).
c. Assessed Tax Knowledge and Education
Table 10
Assessed Tax Knowledge and Education
Indicators
As taxpayer, the SME possess the
Mean
3.69
Sd
0.991
Z
0.313
Percentile
62.279
%Rank
3
3.54
0.634
0.726
76.594
4.15
0.948
-0.158
43.713
4.08
1.269
-0.630
47.487
3.69
0.821
0.378
64.713
3.83
0.240
0.708
76.063
Table 10 shows the respondents assessed tax knowledge and education in terms
of the following indicators. Overall, 76.063 percent of the respondents who
assessed the tax knowledge and education falls below the 0.708 standard
deviation above the standard/benchmark (4 = Agree). The highest percent rank
item is As taxpayer, the SME knows how to keep/ record documents
pertaining to income and expenditure for a period of seven years after
submission of the Tax Return with 76.594 percent of the respondents who
46
Table 11
Assessed Attitudes and Perception of Traders of the Respondents
Indicators
Mean
Sd
Percentil
%Rank
3.69
2.77
0.910
1.049
0.341
1.173
e
63.332
87.951
2
1
3.23
0.46
1.674
95.292
47
Table 12
Assessed Perceived Opportunity for Tax Evasion of the Respondents
Indicators
The figures in the tax return is easily
Mean
2.54
Sd
0.929
Z
1.572
Percentile
94.198
%Rank
1
manipulated
The tax authority is tolerant towards tax
2.77
0.890
1.382
91.652
offenses
The tax authority has limited capability
2.46
1.151
1.338
90.955
3.23
1.309
0.588
72.181
2.75
0.2996
4.172
99.999
Table 12 shows the respondents assessed perceived opportunity for tax evasion
in terms of the following indicators. Overall, 99.999 percent of the respondents
who assessed the tax knowledge and education falls below the 4.172 standard
deviation above the standard/benchmark 4 = Agree). The highest percent rank
item is The figures in the tax return is easily manipulated with 94.198 percent
of the respondents who answered this item falls below the 1.572 standard
deviation above the standard/benchmark (4 = Agree). The least percent rank
item is The probability of being detected by tax authority for not declaring the
exact income received is low with a 72.181 percent of the respondents who
answered this item falls below the 0.588 standard deviation above the
standard/benchmark (4 = Agree).
48
Table 13
Summary statistics:
Observati
ons
Obs. with
missing
data
13
Cost
13
Fines
Knowled
ge
Attitude
s
Perceiv
ed Opp
Variable
Complia
nce
Obs.
without
missing
data
Minim
um
Maxim
um
13
3.000
5.000
13
2.333
5.000
13
13
1.667
4.000
13
13
2.400
4.800
13
13
2.000
4.500
13
13
2.000
3.750
Std.
Me deviati
an
on
4.0
38 0.691
3.4
10 0.818
2.6
41 0.822
3.8
46 0.722
3.2
31 0.971
2.7
50 0.530
Table 14
Correlation matrix (Pearson):
Variables
Attitudes
0.731
-0.910
-0.569
-0.915
0.920
0.617
-0.739
0.768
0.510
Knowledge
0.731
-0.569
1
-0.861
Attitudes
-0.915
0.617
-0.861
1
Perceived
Opp
-0.739 0.768
0.510
-0.620
0.850
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha=0.05
-0.620
0.850
1
-0.816
-0.561
Cost
0.816
1
0.678
0.910
0.920
Fines
Perceived
Opp
Knowledge
Compliance
Cost
Fines
Compliance
-0.561
0.678
1
49
Variables
Compliance
Cost
Fines
Knowledge Attitudes
Compliance
0
0.001
0.046
0.005
0.000
Cost
0.001
0
0.011
< 0.0001 < 0.0001
Fines
0.046
0.011
0
0.042
0.025
Knowledge
0.005 < 0.0001
0.042
0
0.000
Attitudes
< 0.0001 < 0.0001
0.025
0.000
0
Perceived
Opp
0.004
0.002
0.075
0.024
0.000
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha=0.05
Perceived
Opp
0.004
0.002
0.075
0.024
0.000
0
CHAPTER 4:
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter represents the summary of findings, conclusions based on
the results of the research study, and its corresponding recommendations.
Summary of Findings
From the results of the foregoing analysis and interpretation of data, the
following findings were drawn and presented:
55
56
REFERENCES
Aldaba, R. M. (2012). Small and Medium Enterprises' (SMEs) Access to
Finance: Philippines (Philippine Institute for Development Studies). Retrieved
from http://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps1205.pdf
Abrugar, V. (2011) Small Businesses in the Philippines. Retrieved from
http://businesstips.ph/small-businesses-in-the-philippines/
Chan Robles Virtual Library Philippines Laws, statutes and codes. Republic
Act no. 8289 Magna Carta for Small Enterprises. Retrieved from
http://www.chanrobles.com/republicactno8289.htm#.V2Ijrrt97IW
Pagaspas, G.S. (2016) 8 ways to Learn BIR Tax Compliance. Retrieved from
http://taxacctgcenter.org/ways-to-learn-bir-tax-compliance/
Mendoza, R.U and Melchor, M. (2014) SMEs in the Philippines: Going
beyond Survival. Retrieved from: http://www.rappler.com/thoughtleaders/74674-smes-philippines-asian-institute-management
Asean Tax Philippines- Tax incentives in the Philippines. Retrieved from:
http://www.rd.go.th/publish/fileadmin/user_upload/AEC/AseanTaxPhilippines.pdf
Asean Tax Philippines- Policy Incentives Granted to Local SMEs in the
Philippines. Retrieved from:
http://www.asean.org/storage/images/archive/pdf/sme_7.pdf
Adebisi, J.F Ph.D ., et al.(2013) Effect of Multiple Taxation on the
Performance of Small and Medium Scale Business Enterprises. (A Study of
West African Ceremics Ajeokuta, Kogi State). Retrieved from:
http://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/download/310/326.
57
Ameyaw, B., et al. (2015) Tax Policy, SMES, Compliance, Perception and
Growth Relationship in Ghana: An Empirical Analysis. Retrieved from:
http://sciencedomain.org/download/MTIxMTBAQHBm.
Moeinadin, M., et al. (2014) Identifying the Effective Factors for the
Improvement of Tax Compliance. Retrieved from:
http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Article_23_Identifying_the_Effective_Factor
s_for_the_Improvement.pdf
Atawodi, O.W. (2012) Factors That Affect Tax Compliance among Small and
Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in North Central Nigeria. Retrieved from:
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/15251/12028O
jochogwu.
Semikolenova, Y. (1999) Taxation of Small and Medium Enterprises.
Retrieved from:
http://www.kse.org.ua/uploads/file/library/1999/Semikolenova.pdf
Department of Trade and Industry (2014) SMEs Statistics. Retrieved from:
http://www.dti.gov.ph/dti/index.php/resources/sme-resources/sme-statistics
Devos, K. (2007) Measuring and Analysing Deterrence in Taxpayer
Compliance Research. Retrieved from:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/JlATax/2007/5.html#Heading63
Fluid Surveys Team (2014) Descriptive Research: Defining Your Respondents
and Drawing Conclusions. Retrieved from:
http://fluidsurveys.com/university/descriptive-research-defining-respondentsdrawing-conclusions/
Stephenson, T. (2006) the gap between what taxpayers want and what tax
professionals think they want: a reexamination of client expectations and tax
professional aggressiveness. Retrieved from:
http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1281&context=gradschool_diss
Nzioki , P.M (2014)Analysis of Factors Affecting Tax Compliance in Real
Estate Sector: A Case of Real Estate Owners in Nakuru Town, Kenya
Retrieved from:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?
q=cache:lBUvXkoDyxAJ:www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RJFA/article/down
load/13523/14240+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ph
58
Appendix A
Descriptive Statistics for Perceived Tax Compliance
Statistics
On time filing
On time
of tax return
payment of tax
Valid
13
13
Mean
3.92
4.15
Std. Deviation
.923
.662
Missing
Statistics
Cost_Mean
Fines_Mean
Knowledge_
Perception_Mean
Mean
13
13
13
13
13
Mean
3.41
2.64
3.83
3.23
2.75
Std. Deviation
.092
.095
.24
.46
.2996
Valid
Opportunity_Mea
Missing
59
Statistics
Hiring a
Travellin
Filing of
tax agent
g in
tax
of
order to
return
accounta
file tax
nt
return
Valid
N
13
13
13
3.38
3.31
3.53
.923
.91
.634
Missi
ng
Mean
Std.
Deviation
Statistics
Penalty rates are
Enforcement is
Penalties
low
weak
(Surcharge,
Interest, and
Compromise) are
lower than tax
Valid
Missing
Mean
Std. Deviation
Statistics
13 the
13
As taxpayer,
As taxpayer, the
0 the SME knows
0 how
SME possess
savings
13 the
As taxpayer,
As taxpayer, the
0
SME understand
SME knows how to SME knows which
2.54
well that it should obtain a tax payer income should be
1.009
pay taxes due
identification pin
included or
2.62
knowledge to
1.077
declare actual
2.77
to keep/
record
.89
documents
income
income and
within the
expenditure
prescribed period
pertaining to
As taxpayer, the
number
excluded in
determining taxable
income
13
13
13
13
13
Mean
3.69
3.54
4.15
4.08
3.69
Std. Deviation
.991
.634
.948
1.269
.821
Valid
Missing
Statistics
The tax liability is
high
N
Valid
Missing
Mean
Std. Deviation
13
13
3.69
2.77
.91
1.049
60
Statistics
The figures is
The probability of
easily
is tolerant towards
has limited
manipulated
tax offenses
capability
fraudulent tax
income is low
13
13
13
13
Mean
2.54
2.77
2.46
3.23
Std. Deviation
.929
.89
1.151
1.309
Valid
Missing
Appendix B
Profile of the Respondents as to Type of Business
Type of Business
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Manufacturing
23.08
23.08
23.08
Metalcraft
15.38
15.38
38.46
Refilling Station
7.69
7.69
46.15
Bakeshop
23.08
23.08
69.23
General Merchandise
30.77
30.77
100.0
13
100.0
100.0
Total
61
Type of Business
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
Frequency
1
0.5
0
Type of Business
Appendix C
Profile of the Respondents as to Capital
Capital
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 Million - 2 Million
23.08
23.08
23.08
30.77
30.77
54.57
30.77
30.77
85.34
15.38
15.38
100.0
13
100.0
100.0
Total
62
Capital
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
Frequency
1
0.5
0
Amount of Capital
Appendix D
Years of Operation of Respondents
63
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
7.69
7.69
7.69
7.69
7.69
15.38
23.09
23.09
38.47
15.39
15.39
53.86
7.69
7.69
61.55
7.69
7.69
69.24
7.69
7.69
76.93
10
7.69
7.69
84.62
11
7.69
7.69
92.31
12
7.69
7.69
100.0
13
100.0
100.0
Total
Years of service
3.5
3
2.5
2
Frequency
1.5
1
0.5
0
Years of service
Appendix E
64
Number of Employees
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
23.07
23.07
23.07
15.39
15.39
38.46
15.39
15.39
53.85
10
7.69
7.69
61.54
12
7.69
7.69
69.23
13
7.69
7.69
76.92
15
15.39
15.39
92.31
18
7.69
7.69
100.0
13
100.0
100.0
Total
Number of Employees
3.5
2.5
Frequency
1.5
0.5
Axis Title
Appendix F
65
Observation
s
Obs. with
missing
data
13
Cost
13
Fines
Knowledg
e
Attitudes
Perceived
Opp
Variable
Complianc
e
Obs.
without
missing
data
Minimu
m
Maximu
m
13
3.000
5.000
13
2.333
5.000
13
13
1.667
4.000
13
13
2.400
4.800
13
13
2.000
4.500
13
13
2.000
3.750
Mea
n
4.03
8
3.41
0
2.64
1
3.84
6
3.23
1
2.75
0
Std.
deviatio
n
0.691
0.818
0.822
0.722
0.971
0.530
Compliance
Cost
Fines
Knowledge Attitudes
0.81
Compliance
1
6
-0.561
0.731
-0.915
Cost
-0.816
1
0.678
-0.910
0.920
0.67
Fines
-0.561
8
1
-0.569
0.617
0.91
Knowledge
0.731
0
-0.569
1
-0.861
0.92
Attitudes
-0.915
0
0.617
-0.861
1
Perceived
0.76
Opp
-0.739
8
0.510
-0.620
0.850
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha=0.05
Perceived Opp
-0.739
0.768
0.510
-0.620
0.850
1
p-values:
Complianc
e
0
0.001
0.046
0.005
< 0.0001
Variables
Cost
Fines
Knowledge Attitudes
Compliance
0.001
0.046
0.005
0.000
Cost
0
0.011
< 0.0001 < 0.0001
Fines
0.011
0
0.042
0.025
Knowledge
< 0.0001
0.042
0
0.000
Attitudes
< 0.0001
0.025
0.000
0
Perceived
Opp
0.004
0.002
0.075
0.024
0.000
Values in bold are different from 0 with a significance level alpha=0.05
Perceived
Opp
0.004
0.002
0.075
0.024
0.000
0
66
Appendix G
Sample Questionnaire
67
Appendix K
Letter of Request
68