Protective Effects of GLP-1 On Glomerular Endothelium and Its Inhibition by PKC Activation in Diabetes
Protective Effects of GLP-1 On Glomerular Endothelium and Its Inhibition by PKC Activation in Diabetes
Protective Effects of GLP-1 On Glomerular Endothelium and Its Inhibition by PKC Activation in Diabetes
Citation
Published Version
doi:10.2337/db11-1824
Accessed
Citable Link
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11879125
Terms of Use
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
ndothelial pathologies such as thrombotic microangiopathy and mesangiolysis are parts of glomerulopathy because of insulin resistance and
diabetes, which are leading causes of clinical renal disease (1,2). Endothelial dysfunction is postulated to
accelerate the progression of diabetic glomerulopathy as
a result of the inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide (NO)
synthesis (eNOS) and its product, NO (3).
We have reported that activation of the b isoform of
protein kinase C (PKC) by hyperglycemia can cause glomerular endothelial dysfunction and reduce eNOS activation
partially owing to inhibition of insulin action on glomerular
endothelial cells (4,5). Clinically, ruboxistaurin (RBX),
a specic inhibitor of PKCb, has been reported to improve
endothelial dysfunction induced by hyperglycemia (4,6).
Further, studies have associated PKCb activation with
From the 1Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts; the 2Department of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; and the 3Laboratory for Stem Cell
Biology, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan.
Corresponding author: George L. King, [email protected].
Received 23 December 2011 and accepted 12 May 2012.
DOI: 10.2337/db11-1824
This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://diabetes
.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/db11-1824/-/DC1.
2012 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as
long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for prot,
and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
2967
RESULTS
FIG. 1. Diabetes and PKCb2 activation decreases GLP-1R. A: Immunostaining for GLP-1R and CD31 and merge images in the glomeruli and
morphometric analysis of glomerular expression of GLP-1R and CD31. For quantication of the expression of GLP-1R and CD31, the positive
staining area/glomerular area (%) was measured using ImageJ (NIH). For each animal, 50 glomeruli were evaluated. Bar = 50 mm. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. n = number of mice. DM, mice with STZ-induced
diabetes; NDM, nondiabetic mice. *P < 0.05. Magnication 3400. B: Immunoblots of GLP-1R from renal cortex of mice with STZ-induced diabetes
for 6 months. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. *P < 0.05. C: GLP-1R
mRNA expression in the renal cortex of mice with STZ-induced diabetes for 6 months. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in
nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. D: Immunoblots of GLP-1R in RGECs. RGECs were incubated with PMA (4 h) with or without
a PKC-specic inhibitor (GFX), PKCb-specic inhibitor (RBX), or proteasome inhibitor (MG132). **P < 0.001 vs. PMA2, GFX2, RBX2, and
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
2969
EC-PKCb2Tg and WT mice or between nondiabetic ECPKCb2Tg and WT mice (Table 1 and Supplementary Table
2). Diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg mice exhibited more albuminuria compared with diabetic WT mice by 1.5 6 0.5-fold
(Fig. 3A), but they did not differ in creatinine clearance
and glomerular ltration rates (Supplementary Figs. 3F
and G). The width of glomerular basement membrane
(GBM) was signicantly increased by 1.3 6 0.4-fold in diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg mice compared with diabetic WT littermates of the same age (Fig. 3B). Mesangial matrix expansion
was 1.4 6 0.4-fold greater in diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg mice
than in diabetic WT mice. Diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg mice also
exhibited a greater fraction of glomerular area stained
for type IV collagen (Col4) and bronectin than diabetic
WT mice (1.3 6 0.3- and 1.8 6 0.5-fold higher, respectively)
(Fig. 3C). Protein expression of Co14 and bronectin in
the renal cortex were increased signicantly in both
groups of diabetic mice, but the increases were much
greater in diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg mice by 1.4 6 0.1-fold
compared with diabetic WT mice (Supplementary Fig.
3H). This was also reected in their mRNA levels (Supplementary Fig. I).
Evaluation of PAI-1, tissue plasminogen activator,
and eNOS activation in EC-PKCb2Tg mice. In immunohistochemistry studies, diabetes increased PAI-1positive
areas in the glomeruli of diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg mice by
1.3 6 0.4-fold more than in diabetic WT mice (17) (Fig. 3D).
Expression of PAI-1 mRNA level was also increased in the
renal cortex of both diabetic WT mice and EC-PKCb2Tg
mice in concordance with histological studies (Supplementary Fig. 3J). In contrast, areas positive for tissue
plasminogen activator and its mRNA did not change in ECPKCb2Tg or WT mice compared with nondiabetic controls
(Supplementary Figs. 3K and J).
Analysis of eNOS expression and activation in the renal
cortex showed that insulin increased both phospho-Akt
and phospho-eNOS signicantly in WT mice, but its effect
was decreased in EC-PKCb2Tg mice compared with WT
mice by 63 6 8 and by 72 6 7%, respectively (P , 0.05)
(Supplementary Fig. 3L) (3).
Effect of exendin-4 in diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg mice. To
determine whether GLP-1 can prevent endothelial dysfunction induced by diabetes, we determined the effect of
treatment with exendin-4, an analog of GLP-1. Infusion
with exendin-4 signicantly increased urinary cAMP in
nondiabetic WT mice by 1.9 6 0.6-fold, which was decreased by 29 6 13% in diabetic WT mice and by 28 6 12%
in nondiabetic EC-PKCb2Tg mice. Exendin-4 did not signicantly increase urinary cAMP in diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg
mice (Fig. 4A). Treatment with exendin-4 did not prevent
the reduction of GLP-1R protein (Supplementary Fig. 4A)
or mRNA levels (Supplementary Fig. 4B) in the renal cortex
or affect body weight, blood glucose, blood pressure, urine
volume, food intake, plasma insulin, or creatinine clearance
(Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4C). In
contrast, exendin-4 signicantly decreased albuminuria in
both diabetic WT and EC-PKCb2Tg mice by 27 6 10 and
MG1322. P < 0.05 vs. PMA+, GFX2, RBX2, and MG1322. E: GLP-1R mRNA expression in the renal cortex of mice with STZ-induced diabetes for 6
months. F: Immunoprecipitation and immunoblots of ubiquitin-targeted GLP-1R. RGECs were incubated with PMA (4 h) with or without GFX or
RBX. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antiGLP-1R antibody, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and blotted with ubiquitin antibody. **P <
0.001 vs. PMA2, GFX2, and RBX2. P < 0.05 vs. PMA+, GFX2, and RBX2. G and H: Immunoblot analyses (G) and mRNA expression (H) of GLP-1R.
RGECs were transfected with Adgreen uorescent protein (GFP), Ad-PKCa, Ad-PKCb2, or Ad-PKCd as indicated. *P < 0.05 vs. Adgreen
uorescent protein. One of three independently performed experiments is shown. Comparisons were made between groups using either twosample and paired t tests for two-way comparisons or one-way ANOVA for multiple groups to establish statistically signicant differences. Results
are means 6 SD. AU, arbitrary units; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IB, immunoblot; IP, immunoprecipitation; NS, not
signicant. (A high-quality digital representation of this gure is available in the online issue.)
2970
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
FIG. 2. Decreases of GLP-1R in the glomeruli of EC-PKCb2Tg mice. A: Immunostaining for GLP-1R and CD31, merge images in the glomeruli, and
morphometric analysis of glomerular expression of GLP-1R and CD31. Bar = 50 mm. DM, mice with STZ-induced diabetes; NDM, nondiabetic mice;
Tg, EC-PKCb2Tg mice. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. *P < 0.05 vs.
nondiabetic WT mice. P < 0.05 vs. diabetic WT mice. Magnication 3400. B: Immunoblots of GLP-1R from renal cortex of mice with STZ-induced
diabetes for 6 months. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. *P < 0.05 vs.
nondiabetic WT mice. P < 0.05 vs. diabetic WT mice. C: GLP-1R mRNA expression in the renal cortex of mice with STZ-induced diabetes for 6
months. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. D: Immunoprecipitation and
immunoblots of ubiquitin-targeted GLP-1R in each group of mice. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic and
diabetic transgenic mice. **P < 0.001 vs. nondiabetic WT mice. Results are expressed as means 6 SD. One of three independently performed
experiments is shown. Comparisons were made between groups using either two-sample and paired t tests for two-way comparisons or one-way
ANOVA for multiple groups to establish statistically signicant differences. AU, arbitrary units; NS, not signicant; IP, immunoprecipitation; IB,
immunoblot. (A high-quality digital representation of this gure is available in the online issue.)
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
2971
TABLE 1
Physiological characteristics of nondiabetic and diabetic WT and EC-PKCb2Tg mice
Nondiabetic WT
n
Body weight (g)
Blood glucose (mg/dL)
SBP (mmHg)
rKW/BW (mg/g)
33.5
109
99.9
5.2
6
6
6
6
6
1.3
8
7.8
0.8
Diabetic WT
25.2
510
102.8
9.4
6
6
6
6
6
1.4*
54*
8.0
1.3*
Nondiabetic Tg
7
31.9 6
101 6
101.6 6
5.0 6
1.3
7
10
0.7
Diabetic Tg
23.5
507
103.4
11.2
7
6
6
6
6
3.0*
57*
8.5
2.6*
Data are means 6 SD unless otherwise indicated. rKW/BW, right kidney weight/ body weight; SBP, systolic blood pressure; Tg, EC-PKCb2Tg
mice. *P , 0.05 vs. nondiabetic WT mice.
FIG. 3. Functional and histological examinations of diabetic EC-PKCb2Tg and WT mice. A: Albuminuria in mice with STZ-induced diabetes (DM),
nondiabetic mice (NDM), WT mice, and EC-PKCb2Tg mice is shown. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic
(Tg) and diabetic transgenic mice. **P < 0.001 vs. nondiabetic WT mice. P < 0.05 vs. diabetic WT mice. B: Representative views of GBM in each
group of mice and quantication of GBM thickness in each group of mice. Bar = 1 mm. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in
nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic WT mice. P < 0.05 vs. diabetic WT mice. C: Representative light
microscopic appearance of glomeruli (periodic acidSchiff [PAS] and periodic acidmethenamine-silver [PAM] staining), immunohistochemistry of
Col4 and bronectin, and morphometric analysis of periodic acidmethenamine-silver, Col4-, and bronectin-positive staining area. The glomerular periodic acidmethenamine-silver, Col4-, and bronectin-positive staining area was measured. Bar = 50 mm. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT and
diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic WT mice. P < 0.05 vs. diabetic WT mice.
Magnication 3400. D: Immunostaining for PAI-1 in each group of mice and analysis of glomerular expression of PAI-1. Bar = 50 mm. n = 6 in
nondiabetic WT and diabetic WT mice; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic and diabetic transgenic mice. *P < 0.05 vs. nondiabetic WT mice. P < 0.05
vs. diabetic WT mice. Magnication 3400. One of three independently performed experiments is shown. Results are expressed as means 6 SD. For
all the studies above, comparisons were made between groups using either two-sample and paired t tests for two-way comparisons or one-way
ANOVA for multiple groups to establish statistically signicant differences. (A high-quality digital representation of this gure is available in the
online issue.)
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
2973
FIG. 4. Effect of exendin-4 (Ex-4) treatment in EC-PKCb2Tg mice. A: Urinary cAMP excretions in each group are shown: mice with STZ-induced diabetes
(DM), nondiabetic mice (NDM), WT mice, and EC-PKCb2Tg mice. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT plus vehicle, nondiabetic WT plus exendin-4, diabetic WT plus
vehicle, diabetic WT plus exendin-4, nondiabetic transgenic (Tg) plus exendin-4, and diabetic transgenic plus exendin-4; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic
plus vehicle and diabetic transgenic plus vehicle. *P < 0.05 vs. WT/nondiabetic/exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. WT/nondiabetic/exendin-4+. B: Albuminuria in
each test group is shown. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT plus vehicle, nondiabetic WT plus exendin-4, diabetic WT plus vehicle, diabetic WT plus exendin-4,
nondiabetic transgenic plus exendin-4, and diabetic transgenic plus exendin-4; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic plus vehicle and diabetic transgenic plus
vehicle. *P < 0.05 vs. WT/nondiabetic/exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. WT/diabetic/exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. transgenic/diabetic/exendin-42. C: Representative
light microscopic appearance of glomeruli periodic acidSchiff (PAS) and periodic acidmethenamine-silver (PAM) staining. Bar = 50 mm. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT plus vehicle, nondiabetic WT plus exendin-4, diabetic WT plus vehicle, diabetic WT plus exendin-4, nondiabetic transgenic plus exendin-4, and
diabetic transgenic plus exendin-4; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic plus vehicle and diabetic transgenic plus vehicle. Magnication 3400.
D: Immunostaining for PAI-1 in each group of mice is shown. Bar = 50 mm. n = 6 in nondiabetic WT plus vehicle, nondiabetic WT plus exendin-4, diabetic WT
plus vehicle, diabetic WT plus exendin-4, nondiabetic transgenic plus exendin-4, and diabetic transgenic plus exendin-4; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic
plus vehicle and diabetic transgenic plus vehicle. Magnication 3400. One of three independently performed experiments is shown. Results are expressed
as means 6 SD. Comparisons were made between groups using either two-sample and paired t tests for two-way comparisons or one-way ANOVA for
multiple groups to establish statistically signicant differences. (A high-quality digital representation of this gure is available in the online issue.)
2974
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
FIG. 5. Exendin-4 (Ex-4) decreased effect of Ang II on Erk1/2/PAI-1 signaling. A: Immunoblots of phosphoc-Raf (p-c-Raf)(Ser259), phospho
c-Raf(Ser338), and phospho-Erk1/2 (p-Erk1/2) in RGECs stimulated with Ang II in the presence or absence of PD98059, SB203580, exendin-4,
or H89. **P < 0.001 vs. Ang II2/PD980592/SB2035802/exendin-42/H892; P < 0.05 vs. Ang II2/PD980592/SB2035802/exendin-4+/H892; P < 0.05,
P < 0.001 vs. Ang II+/PD980592/SB2035802/exendin-42/H892; P < 0.05 vs. Ang II+/PD980592/SB2035802/exendin-4+/H892. B: Immunoblots of
phosphoc-Raf(Ser259), phosphoc-Raf(Ser338), and phospho-Erk1/2 in RGECs stimulated with Ang II (10 nmol/L) in the presence or absence of
exendin-4 or MDL12330A. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001 vs. Ang II2/exendin-42/MDL12330A2; P < 0.05 vs. Ang II2/exendin-4+/MDL12330A2; P < 0.05
vs. Ang II+/exendin-42/MDL123302; P < 0.05 vs. Ang II+/exendin-4+/MDL123302. One of three independently performed experiments is shown.
Comparisons were made between groups using either two-sample and paired t tests for two-way comparisons or one-way ANOVA for multiple
groups to establish statistically signicant differences. Results are expressed as means 6 SD. AU, arbitrary units.
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
2975
FIG. 6. Effect of PKC activation (PMA), knockdown, or blocking of GLP-1R on exendin-4 (Ex-4)-stimulated inhibition of Ang II on phosphoc-Raf
(p-c-Raf)(Ser338), phospho-Erk1/2 (p-Erk1/2), and PAI-1 activity in RGECs. A: Immunoblots of phosphoc-Raf(Ser259), phosphoc-Raf(Ser338),
and phospho-Erk1/2 in RGECs stimulated with PMA (100 nmol/L) in the presence or absence of exendin-4 are shown. **P < 0.001 vs. PMA2/
exendin-42 and P < 0.05 vs. PMA+/exendin-42. B: Immunoblots of phosphoc-Raf(Ser338) and phospho-Erk1/2 in RGECs stimulated with PMA in
the presence or absence of GFX or RBX. *P < 0.05 vs. PMA2/GFX2/RBX2; P < 0.05 vs. PMA+/GFX2/RBX2. C: Immunoblots of phosphoc-Raf
(Ser338) and phospho-Erk1/2 in RGECs stimulated with Ang II in the presence or absence of GFX or RBX. *P < 0.05 vs. Ang II2/GFX2/RBX2; P <
0.05 vs. Ang II+/GFX2/RBX2. D: Immunoblots of phosphoc-Raf(Ser259), phosphoc-Raf(Ser338), and phospho-Erk1/2 in RGECs transfected with
small interfering GLP-1R or small interfering control, stimulated with Ang II in the presence or absence of exendin-4. **P < 0.001 vs. small interfering control/Ang II2/exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. siControl/Ang II2/exendin-4+; P < 0.05 vs. siControl/Ang II+/exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs.
siControl/Ang II+/exendin-4+. E: Immunoblots of phosphoc-Raf(Ser259), phosphoc-Raf(Ser338), and phospho-Erk1/2 in RGECs stimulated with
Ang II in the presence or absence of exendin-4 or exendin-3(9-39) [Ex-3(9-39)] are shown. **P < 0.001 vs. Ang II2/exendin-42/exendin-3(9-39)2;
P < 0.05 vs. Ang II2/exendin-4+/exendin-3(9-39)2; P < 0.05 vs. Ang II+/exendin-42/exendin-3(9-39)2; P < 0.05 vs. Ang II+/exendin-4+/exendin-3
(9-39)2. One of three independently performed experiments is shown. Comparisons were made between groups using either two-sample and paired
t tests for two-way comparisons or one-way ANOVA for multiple groups to establish statistically signicant differences. Results are expressed as
means 6 SD. AU, arbitrary units.
2976
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
FIG. 7. Exendin-4 (Ex-4) decreased angiotensin II or diabetes-induced increases of phosphoc-Raf (p-c-Raf)(Ser338) in the glomeruli and renal
cortex. A: Immunoblots of phosphoc-Raf(Ser259), phosphoc-Raf(Ser338), and phospho-Erk1/2 (p-Erk1/2) in the glomeruli. Exendin-4 (1.0
nmol/kg) or diluents were administrated intraperitoneally to mice. After 2-h administration of exendin-4, Ang II (100 ng/kg/3 mL/min) or saline
was infused through the jugular vein. After 3-h continuous infusion, glomeruli were corrected. n = 35. Tg, transgenic. *P < 0.05 vs. WT/Ang II2/
exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. WT/Ang II+/exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. transgenic/Ang II2/exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. WT/Ang II+/exendin-42; #P < 0.05
vs. transgenic/Ang II+/exendin-42. B: Immunoblots of phosphoc-Raf(Ser259), phosphoc-Raf(Ser338), and phospho-Erk1/2 in the renal cortex.
n = 6 in nondiabetic WT plus vehicle, nondiabetic WT plus exendin-4, diabetic WT plus vehicle, diabetic WT plus exendin-4, nondiabetic
transgenic plus exendin-4, and diabetic transgenic plus exendin-4; n = 7 in nondiabetic transgenic plus vehicle and diabetic transgenic plus
vehicle. DM, mice with STZ-induced diabetes; NDM, nondiabetic mice. *P < 0.05 vs. WT/nondiabetic/exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. WT/diabetic/
exendin-42; P < 0.05 vs. transgenic/diabetic/exendin-42. One of three independently performed experiments is shown. Comparisons were
made between groups using either two-sample and paired t tests for two-way comparisons or one-way ANOVA for multiple groups to establish
statistically signicant differences. Results are expressed as means 6 SD. C: Schematic diagram of the inhibitory effects of PKCb2 on the
protective action of GLP-1 signaling against the effects of Ang IImediated glomerular pathology. AU, arbitrary units; ECM, extracellular
matrix.
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
2977
diabetes.diabetesjournals.org
20. Sharma K, Ix JH, Mathew AV, et al. Pirfenidone for diabetic nephropathy.
J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22:11441151
21. Jiang ZY, Lin YW, Clemont A, et al. Characterization of selective resistance
to insulin signaling in the vasculature of obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats. J Clin
Invest 1999;104:447457
22. Hirata K, Kume S, Araki S, et al. Exendin-4 has an anti-hypertensive effect
in salt-sensitive mice model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009;380:4449
23. Cook SJ, McCormick F. Inhibition by cAMP of Ras-dependent activation of
Raf. Science 1993;262:10691072
24. Dhillon AS, Pollock C, Steen H, Shaw PE, Mischak H, Kolch W. Cyclic
AMP-dependent kinase regulates Raf-1 kinase mainly by phosphorylation
of serine 259. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:32373246
25. Hagiwara M, Brindle P, Harootunian A, et al. Coupling of hormonal stimulation and transcription via the cyclic AMP-responsive factor CREB is
rate limited by nuclear entry of protein kinase A. Mol Cell Biol 1993;13:
48524859
26. Doucas V, Shi Y, Miyamoto S, West A, Verma I, Evans RM. Cytoplasmic
catalytic subunit of protein kinase A mediates cross-repression by
NF-kappa B and the glucocorticoid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;
97:1189311898
27. Zhou J, Livak MF, Bernier M, et al. Ubiquitination is involved in glucosemediated downregulation of GIP receptors in islets. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007;293:E538E547
28. Koyanagi T, Wong LY, Inagaki K, Petrauskene OV, Mochly-Rosen D. Alteration of gene expression during progression of hypertension-induced
cardiac dysfunction in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008;295:
H220H226
29. Toer GH, Massaro J, Levy D, et al. Relation of the prothrombotic state to
increasing age (from the Framingham Offspring Study). Am J Cardiol 2005;
96:12801283
30. Paueksakon P, Revelo MP, Ma LJ, Marcantoni C, Fogo AB. Microangiopathic injury and augmented PAI-1 in human diabetic nephropathy.
Kidney Int 2002;61:21422148
2979