MCK - Report On Capturing Synergies
MCK - Report On Capturing Synergies
MCK - Report On Capturing Synergies
June 2010
A McKinsey perspective
on value creation and
synergies
Putting new emphasis on transformation and revenue, the framework opens the aperture so companies
consider the full range of opportunities to derive maximum value from any merger.
Exhibit 1
McKinsey framework for identifying, quantifying,
and capturing synergies
Cost
Seek select
transformational
opportunities
Capture
combinational
synergies
Protect base
business
Capital
Revenue
Exhibit 2
Sample sources of value and synergies:
consumer goods example
Cost
Seek select
transformational
opportunities
Capture
combinational
synergies
Protect base
business
Capital
Duplicate overhead
Overlapping sales branches
Procurement
Market research spend
Underutilized warehouses
Cash flow and liquidity
positions
Leverage lower funding rates
Revenue
Redesign routes
market/optimize distributor
network
Enter products, geographies,
and channels new to both
companies
Cross-fertilizing products
Cross-fertilize products,
geographies, and channels
This is not as straightforward as it sounds. McKinsey research has found that acquirers typically see sales
decline eight percent in the quarter after announcing the deal.
Companies with significant merger experience avoid this pitfall by concentrating on:
Keeping the business running, including maintaining accountability for current-year results and making
the investments required to sustain quality
Separating integration efforts from running the business, with integration managed by an integration
office staffed with high-caliber people
Shortening the post-announcement, pre-close period and announcing the new management team as
early as possible
Retaining customers and important talent through shared aspirations, clear communication, and
appropriate incentives.
But their zeal to achieve due diligence targets often makes even experienced companies myopic. They
overinvest executive attention and integration talent in that effort, failing to protect the base business or
organize clean teams that could scope the full landscape of value creation opportunities so the combined
company could begin to profit on day #1.
Most efforts to capture combinational synergies focus, at least initially, on cost and capital. These efforts
typically exceed expected short-term estimates. But because they rely on across-the-board rules of
thumb and ratios, they often underestimate savings, leaving money on the table. One company met its due
diligence targets six months ahead of schedule. But a new business unit head who arrived at that point
found 20 percent more than originally estimated by taking a clean-sheet approach.
Meanwhile, a company focused only on cost and capital is
overlooking the growth opportunities represented by revenue
synergies. Historically, many companies shied away from the
uncertainty and risk associated with these synergies early in
merger planning. But when less of a mergers value lies in cost
or scale, revenue synergies loom larger in value creation and
need immediate attention. In many industries a one percent
increase in revenue growth creates more value than a one
percent increase in EBIT. Failure to consider revenue synergies
from the start may delay realization of any value from them by a
year or more.
Companies that avoid this pitfall often organize crossfunctional teams to define ways to meet synergy targets and
develop realistic plans for achieving the targets.
4 Aspirational targets
Transformational synergies represent huge potential for breakthrough performance. But because
transformation involves complexity that often exceeds managements capacity, it can bring the business
to a grinding halt. Management needs to focus selectively on a handful of targeted functions, processes,
capabilities, or business units that make breakthrough performance possible and financially worthwhile.
Exhibit 3
Recent consumer goods merger
Transformational synergies
Annual run-rate of delivered synergies, USD billions
0.6
1.4
+75%
0.8
Combinational
synergy
Transformational synergy
Total
Consider the recent merger of two major consumer goods companies. Recognizing the superiority of the
targets innovative approach to distribution management, the acquirer assigned its top integration team the
task of figuring out how to incorporate that approach into its own entrenched distribution practices. Their
success boosted the value of the deal 75 percent.
Such success typically requires creating a team dedicated to locating breakthrough opportunities, setting bold
goals for value creation, and providing incentives with real upside for breakthrough performance. Capturing
transformational synergies requires disproportionate senior executive time. The CEO in the consumer goods
merger met twice as often and twice as long with the breakthrough team lead than with the leads of the other 12
integration teams. The breakthrough team delivered more than 40 percent of the total synergies.
Companies contemplating transformational synergies must assess their readiness to capture each opportunity:
Will we have the capabilities and financial means required for success?
Do we have enough appetite for risk and full executive commitment?
Can we stay the course until we realize value?
Are we willing to break some glass to capture the opportunities?
With economic recovery looming, interest in mergers is reawakening as companies seek new ways to benefit
from the upturn. The McKinsey framework for identifying and quantifying synergies can help ensure they weigh
and balance all their options for realizing value from a merger.