Remy New Pess
Remy New Pess
Remy New Pess
Date
RATING
SCALE
Approved by :
MFO/PAP
Success Indicator
Alloted Budget
(Target + Measure)
Division/Individuals
Accountable
Actual
Accomplishments
as scheduled;
Questionnaire &
GMSAguada
w/ 90% acceptability
acceptability
GMSAguada
100% accuracy
accuracy;
received
GMSAguada
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Ratings
E
T
Remarks
LandBank, Vigan
GSIS Laoag
4
5 4.6667
3 mins./appl. With
appl. w/ 100%
as scheduled;
Conducted 2 RCS as
scheduled; questionnaires
Checklist accomplished
4 mins./
5
4
3
2
1
Conducted 2 Prime-HRM
checklists accomplished
assessment as scheduled;
MFO/PAP
Success Indicator
Alloted Budget
Division/Individuals
Ratings
Actual
Remarks
Core Functions:
Prepared RAI Monitoring Reports
GMSAguada
acceptability
acceptability, when
4 4.3333
4 4.3333
4.67
5 4.6667
processed
GMSAguada
processed 100% of
90% of all
appts. received
w/in 3 days w/
90% accuracy
accuracy.
10 mins
GMSAguada
upon rcpt/
appl. w/ 90%
accuracy
Rendered Resource Speaking Services
as scheduled
GMSAguada
w/ 80% acceptability
rendered RS on PETSA
4.5
Issued E-Receipts
receipts
GMSAguada
E-receipts issued
issued w/
100% accuracy
accuracy
Monthly Reports
GMSAguada
Monthly reports
prepared on deadline
w/ 100% accuracy
legal
Rendered Legal Counseling
counseling rendered
to all w/in 15 mins
Success Indicator
MFO/PAP
Alloted Budget
Division/Individuals
Ratings
Actual
Remarks
5 mins/
EAPS
GMSAguada
appl. w/
3 mins/appl. With
4 DepEd
100% accuracy
100% accuracy
Prepared Post-evaluation reports
1 wk after the
GMSAguada
prepared beyond 1 wk
conduct of training
w/ 100% accuracy
info. Sent to
customers as requred
GMSAguada
w/ 90% acceptability
by batch
5 4.6667
acceptability
Final Average Rating
Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes
Average Rating
Category
MFO
3
7
3
Strategic Priority
Core Functions
Support Functions
Total Overall Rating
Final Average Rating
Adjectival Rating
4.778
X.45
4.6428571429 X.45
4.5555555556 X.10
2.150
2.089
0.456
4.695
V.S.
Assessed by:
Date
Head of OPMIS
Discussed with
Rating
Date
Date
Assessed by :
Date
Date
MFO/PAP
GRACIA MINETTE S. AGUADA
Employee
Success Indicator
Division/Individuals
Alloted Budget
CECILIA R. BARENG
Supervisor
Actual
Ratings
NELSON G. SARMIENTO
Head of Office
Remarks
4.778
2.150
4.642857 2.089286
4.555556 0.455556
4.695
Annex C
Date
Approved by :
DR. TRINA TABBOGA TALAGA
Head of Office
RATING
SCALE
MERILYN GARCIA
Immediate Supervisor
Success Indicator
Alloted Budget
(Target + Measure)
Division/Individuals
Accountable
J. RAMOS
100% accuracy
MFO/PAP
Actual
Accomplishments
Strategic Priorities
5
4
3
2
1
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Ratings
E
T
4.67
4.67
logbooks completed
linen supplies.
J. RAMOS
accuracy
Remarks
Success Indicator
Alloted Budget
(Target + Measure)
Division/Individuals
Accountable
J. RAMOS
forwarded specimen
MFO/PAP
Actual
Accomplishments
Ratings
E
T
Core Functions:
4.67
4.67
4.34
4.34
4.34
4.34
95% accuracy
tooked and recorded information of the patient,
J. RAMOS
100% accuracy
Cleaned used instruments and send
cleaning of used
J. RAMOS
J. RAMOS
therapeutic environment
accuracy.
J. RAMOS
as needed, assisted
examination with
accuracy.
90% accuracy
maintained cleanliness and orderliness of the unit.
cleanliness and
orderliness maintained
with 90% acceptability
J. RAMOS
Remarks
Success Indicator
Alloted Budget
(Target + Measure)
Division/Individuals
Accountable
as scheduled
J. RAMOS
conferences
conferences attended
conferences attended.
MFO/PAP
Actual
Accomplishments
Ratings
E
T
Remarks
Support Functions:
acceptability
acceptability
J. RAMOS
as scheduled
submitted assignment
and accomplishment
J RAMOS
report on deadline
4.34
4.34
4.34
Average Rating
Category
MFO
2
6
3
Strategic Priority
Core Functions
Support Functions
Total Overall Rating
Final Average Rating
Adjectival Rating
Assessed by:
Date
Head of OPMIS
Discussed with
Rating
Date
Date
Assessed by :
Approved by:
Date
MFO/PAP
Success Indicator
Alloted Budget
(Target + Measure)
Division/Individuals
Accountable
Actual
Accomplishments
Ratings
E
T
Remarks
Annex C
Date
Approved by :
Head of Office
RATING
SCALE
Immediate Supervisor
MFO/PAP
Strategic Priorities
Success Indicator
(Target + Measure)
Alloted Budget
Division/Individuals
Accountable
Actual
Accomplishments
5
4
3
2
1
Outstanding
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Ratings
E
T
Remarks
Core Functions:
Support Functions:
Average Rating
Category
Strategic Priority
Core Functions
Support Functions
Total Overall Rating
Final Average Rating
Adjectival Rating
MFO
Rating
X
X
X.
Assessed by:
Date
COMMISSION
Date
Discussed with
Employee
Date
Approved by:
Head of Office