MS Porter Analysis

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Threat of new Entrants - LOW:

Cost of entry is quite high as it requires installation of a complete


plant and regulatory licenses that make entry for a new comer hard.
Therefore it would be safe to say that with a history
of strong market share, a potentially sustainable
brand and the existing success story of Milo, with a
hefty 20% chunk of the overall flavored milk
subsector, Nestle Milk Pak will remain a secure

entity with less threats of new entrants to


Bargaining Power of Suppliers HIGH:
Flavor
is
product
differentiation and a value
addition by adding a product to
the portfolio. Thus the bargaining
power of suppliers remain high
as additional milk supply is
demanded from them in order to
make flavored milk. Already the
suppliers enjoy huge bargaining
power, an increase in demand
will strengthen their position in
the supply chain of the industry.

Rivalry among Competition - HIGH:


Rivalry is high amongst the
competitors of the packaged milk
industry as there is no competitive
edge which a company enjoys and
the competition is highly revolving
around price factors.

Bargaining Power of Buyers


MODERATE TO HIGH:
The bargaining power of
consumers may be high, but
this is moderate for Milk Pak
as it overtime has established
brand
loyalty
&
enjoys
consumers top of mind. The
bargaining
power
of
customers is same for the sub
sector of the flavored milk
market.

Threats of Substitutes MEDIUM:


Open threat could be from cannibalization of the
newly launched product by Milo as it enjoys a strong
market share and a history while other threat could
be from the fizzy drinks with different flavors.
Although milk is a different category but a strong
marketing campaign where a perception built that
flavored milk is better for the children, offering health
benefits as it has fortified iron and Vitamin A and C,
the threat of substitute products could be lowered
down.

You might also like