2) ESP Basics

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 60

Worldwide Pollution

Control Association
FirstEnergy ESP Seminar
November 27th 28th, 2007

Visit our website at www.wpca.info

ESP Basics

By
Tom Lugar
Buell Division
Fisher-Klosterman, Inc.

Fundamentals
of
Electrostatic Precipitator
(ESP) Operation

The Process in Electrostatic Precipitation


Particle Charging
Particle Collection
Removal of Collected Particulate

Electrostatic Precipitator
A Box with Wires and Plates

ESP Roof Area: H.V. Transformers,


Rappers, Insulator Houses

H.V. Insulator House

Gas Passages 9 Centers

Particle Charging and Collection

ESP Gas Passage Particle Charging & Collection

Emitting Electrodes Corona Emission

Emitting Electrodes Corona Emission

Typical Electromagnetic
Impact Rapper

Typical Rotating Hammer


Rapper Rapping System

Rotating Hammer Rapping System

Automatic Voltage Control (Typical)

Factors Affecting ESP


Sizing and Performance

Precipitator Sizing
Deutsch Equation for ESP Collection Efficiency

= 1 - e -(Aw/Q)
Where:

= Collection Efficiency, fraction


A = Collecting Plate Area, ft2
Q = Flue Gas Volume, ft3/sec (actual)
W = Charged Particle Migration Velocity, ft/sec

The migration velocity of the charged particulate


is roughly proportional the precipitator voltage.
W V2
It is therefore critical that a high voltage level
be maintained in the precipitator for optimal
charging and collection.

Specific Collecting Area - SCA


SCA =

Collecting Plate Area ft2


1000 ft3/min. flue gas treated

Example: 400,000 ft2 plate area


1,000,000 ACFM Gas Flow
SCA = 400

ESP Sizing and Performance


For a given gas volume, precipitator sizing and performance
are dependent on the following specified or assumed
parameters:
Ash Particle Size

Ash Loading
Ash Resistivity
The above parameters vary depending on the type of boiler,
fuel, flue gas temperature and flue gas constituents.

Particle Size Considerations


Very fine particles, less than one micron diameter, provide
small cross sections or targets for capture of negative ions.
Fine particles require more treatment time to capture a
sufficient number of ions to attain an adequate charge.

Charged particles less than 1 micron travel to the grounded


plates in a random motion instead of a more direct path as
taken by larger ash particles.
The particulate removal efficiency of the outlet electrical
fields of an ESP will be less than that of the inlet fields.

ESP Collecting Plate Flyash Layer


Scanning Electron Microscope Image 500X

ESP Collecting Plate Flyash Layer


Scanning Electron Microscope Image -2000X

Ash Loading Considerations


High ash loadings interfere with particle charging
by suppressing the corona from the emitters and
thus the negative ions generated for charging.
The effect of suppression becomes significant if the
higher ash loading has a large population of fines.

Ash Resistivity
Definition: The degree of electrical
conductivity of the ash expressed in ohms-cm.
Typical Range: 1 x 109 - 1 x 1013
The value of resistivity depends on the flue gas
temperature, gas constituents, and chemical
composition of the flyash.

Due to the resistive ash layer on the collecting plate, ionic charge

is stored on the ash layer surface and only a small amount of


current flows through the ash layer to the grounded plate.
Most of the voltage drop is in the ash layer and not in the gap
where particle charging occurs.

Car Battery Analogy

Current flow is reduced due to the resistivity of the corrosive layer


between the battery clamp and terminal.

Effect of Low Ash Resistivity, <1 x 108


Collected ash particles lose their charge quickly
and become re-entrained into the gas steam.

Effect of High Ash Resistivity, 1012 -1013


Low power levels, low voltage sparking,
back corona formation.

Back Corona

If the ash layer voltage drop is very large due to very high resistivity, Back
Corona will form when the ash layer breaks down and the total voltage, Vt,
is not sufficient for sparkover.

With Back Corona, positive corona occurs on the ash layer surface
forming positive ions that are attracted to the negative polarity emitters.
Positive ions encounter negative ions effectively canceling their
contribution to the particle charging process.

Back Corona Glow Regions on Collecting Plate Ash Surfaces


Plan View Looking Down Into a Gas Passage

Effect of High Ash Resistivity on Charged


Particle Migration Velocity

Factors Affecting Flyash Resistivity

Resistivity of Flyash from Low Sulfur Coal @ 300oF

Elemental Analysis of Flyash


Typical Range of Constituents
Component
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
Na2O
K2O
Li2O
TiO2
P2O5
SO3

Maximum %
61.00
31.00
23.70
23.50
5.50
2.66
3.90
0.07
2.30
1.00
1.83

Minimum %
41.20
17.90
3.90
0.30
0.90
0.13
0.28
0.01
0.80
0.16
0.07

The Major Ash Resistivity Effects Due to Mineral


Compounds in the Ash are:
SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, MgO - Increases Ash Resistivity
Na2O, Li2O - Reduces Ash Resistivity
A Most Difficult Combination of Ash and Coal
Constituents For ESP Operation:
SiO2 + Al2O3 > 80%
Fe2O3 < 5%
Na2O < 0.5%
Coal Sulfur Content < 1%
ESP Flue Gas Temperature 330 to 350oF

Deterioration of ESP
Performance Over Time
Ageing of the Box

Excessive Emitter & Plate Ash Buildup

Cracked Support insulator

ESP Rebuild
Restore

Performance
Reduce Maintenance Requirements
Life Extension of the ESP

Precipitator Design Practice - U.S. OEMS


Design Characteristics

Prior

Current

Plate-to-Plate Spacing

8- 9

12 - 16

Precipitator Voltage

45KV

55-75KV

Emitting Electrode
Rapping System

Control System

Wire-Weight
Vibrators/Electromagnetic Impact,
Rotating Hammer
Analog

Rigid
AllElectro-Mag.
Impact, Rotating
Hammer
Microprocessor
based with
Host Computer

Note: Rebuild with Rigid Emitters requires increased plate


spacing, 10-12

Rigid Emitting Electrode Sampling

Rigid Emitting Electrode Example


Pipe & Pin

Rigid Emitting Electrode Example


Mast Type

Rigid Emitting Electrode Example


Pipe and Flared Strip Emitters

Typical Rebuild with Pipe & Pin Emitters

Rebuild With Rigid Emitters will Require Wider


Collecting Plate Spacing in the ESP

Doesnt Less Collecting Plate Area (SCA)


In the Same ESP Box Mean Less Particulate
Collection Efficiency?
Answer: No

Wide Plate Spacing


For a Given Precipitator Casing, Collecting Plate Area
Can be Reduced by Increasing the Plate-To-Plate
Spacing While Maintaining the Collection Efficiency
The Charged Particle Migration Velocity Increases
in Proportion to the Increase in ESP Voltage With
Spacing.
The Increased Voltage Creates an Increased Electric
Field That Further Accelerates the Charged Particles
Attracted to the Grounded Plates.

Wide Plate Spacing

You might also like