Alginate Impression
Alginate Impression
Alginate Impression
1, January 2015
Myanmar
Dental
Journal
Vol.22, No.1
January 2015
Content
Editorial...........................................................................................................................................................3
Review Articles
v
alginate Impression
In vitro study of margical fit of ceramage crown related to different margin Designs....................41
Case Report
v
Editorial
Review Article
Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Sharavathi Dental College and Hospital, Shivamogga, India
Abstract:
Periodontal Disease:
Periodontium means structures surrounding the teeth
and they are the Gingiva, Periodontal ligament (a
soft collagenous tissue which attaches the root to the
bone), Cementum (a hard calcified covering on the
root), and Alveolar bone. Thus, Periodontal diseases
are a group of diseases which affect the integrity of
the teeth resulting in bone loss, tooth mobility and
tooth loss4.
DIABETES MELLITUS:
PREGNANCY OUTCOME:
Pregnancy ushers in a myriad of changes in the
structure and composition of the Periodontal tissues9.
Changes in the hormonal levels in the first and third
trimester increase the susceptibility to infection.
Pregnancy associated gingivitis or at times tumor
like masses, often referred to as Pregnancy tumors
are not uncommon9.
REFERENCES:
IMPOTENCY:
Nothing can be said in particular about this, but it has
been observed that prolonged chronic inflammation,
like that found in men with periodontal disease, can
cause damage to blood vessels which can lead to
erectile dysfunction, impotence or affect his sexual
health in general (AAP)20. Outwardly it seems to be
more of a risk factor than an initiating factor, and
further research in this area is required.
CONCLUSION:
Original Article
INTRODUCTION
Oral malignancy is a major global health problem
and it constitutes the sixth most common malignancy.
9
AIM
Forward (pU-1M)
(5-TGTCAAAAACCGTTGTGTCC-3)
Reverse (pU-2R)
(5-GAGCTGTCGCTTAATTGCTC-3)
Targeting a region of about 230 bp specific to high
and intermediate oncogenic risk HPV (type 16, 18,
31, 33, 35, 52, and 58)
PLACE OF STUDY
Department of Oral Medicine, University of Dental
Medicine, Yangon
Forward (pU-31B)
(5-TGCTAATTCGGTGCTACCTG-3)
Reverse (pU-2R)
(5-GAGCTGTCGCTTAATTGCTC-3)
Targeting a 228 bp region specific to low risk
oncogenic HPV (type 6 and 11) are used to amplify
HPV DNA.
DISCUSSION
paraffin
embedded
tissue
11
REFERENCES
12
Original Research
Abstract
Introduction
Oral cancer is the sixth most common
cancer in the world and fifth most common cancer
in ASEAN (Ferlay et al 2004, Merral et al 2012). In
South Asian and East Asian countries, oral cancer
contributes up to 50% of all new cases of cancer. In
Indian males, oral cancer is the first most common
cancer. In Sri Lanka, oral cancer ranked first in
five most common cancers (Khandekar et al 2006).
Myanmar involves in high risk countries in South
East Asia and ranked 6th position in males and 10th
position in females among all types of cancers.
It is commonly related to tobacco habits (Oo et al
2011). In Myanmar, the occurrence of oral cancer
is not clearly known where betel quid chewing
habits are widely spread. The purpose of the study
is to determine the epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics of oral cancer.
Patients and Method
After obtaining the informed consent, 120 patients
diagnosed with oral cancer attending at University
of Dental Medicine, Yangon and Department of
Plastic, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yangon
General Hospital from January 2012 to September
2012, who recruited for Asean Costs In Oncology
Study Myanmar, were included. Patients who were
18 years and above, with first time cancer diagnosis
and willing to participate in the baseline and two
follow-up interviews were selected. Epidemiologic
characteristics,
clinical
characteristics
and
histopathological descriptions were recorded
according to WHO Oral Cancer Assessment forms
13
Results
Males were more affected than females (1.55:1).
(Fig. 1).Education level of the patients were middle
and high school level (49.17% (Fig.2.) and most
were non-skill workers (29.67%). (Fig.4). Overall
tobacco users including smoking and chewing were
84.9%. Over half of the patients had poor oral hygiene
(59.17%). Squamous cell carcinoma comprised
77.5% of all oral cancers (Fig.6) and buccal mucosa
was the most affected site (33.33%).(Fig.7,7A-D).
Patients represented with stage IV oral cancer
were 60% (Fig.8). In grading of oral squamous cell
carcinomas, 83.9% were well differentiated (Fig.9).
14
Figure.6.
cancer
15
For correspondence :
Acknowledgements
We wish to gratefully acknowledge ASEAN
Foundation for funding and George Institute for
Global Health, Australia for the technical support.
16
Original Research
Abstract
Results: Retention values of two base plates fabricated from the casts obtained from two impression materials,
(mean 367 gf for compound, standard technique and 368 gf for silicone) were not significant.
Figure 6. Comparison of retentive forces of two base plates which obtained from different materials
18
References
Appelbaum, E.M., Mehra, R.V., (1984). Clinical
evaluation of polyvinyl siloxane for complete
denture impression. J Prosthet Dent, 52, pp. 537539.
Craddock, F.W., (1951). Prosthetic dentistry; a
clinical outline. St. Louis: CV Mosby.
Hayakawa, I., (2003). Impression for complete
dentures using silicone impression materials.
Quintessence Int, 34, pp. 177-180.
Levin, B., (1984). Impression for Complete Dentures.
Chicago: Quintessence.
Lu, H., Nguyen, B., Powers, J.M., (2004).
Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition
silicone and polyether elastomeric impression
materials. J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp. 151-154.
Rizk, F., (2008). Effect of different border molding
materials on complete denture retention. Cairo
Dental Journal. 3, pp. 415-420.
Sanjeev, M., (2012). Single step silicone border
molding technique for edentulous impression. Int J
of Clinical Cases and Investigations. 4(2), pp. 8590.
Smith, D., (1979). One-step border molding of
complete denture impressions using a polyether
impression material. J Prosthet Dent. 41, p. 347.
Tan, H.K., Hooper, P.M., Baergen, C.G., (1996).
Variability in the shape of maxillary vestibular
impression recorded with modeling plastic and a
polyether impression material. Int J Prosthodont, 9,
pp. 282-289.
Woelfel, J.B., (1963). Contour variations in one
patients impression made by seven dentists. J Am
Dent Assoc, 67, pp. 1-9.
Zarb,G.A.; Bolender, C.L. and Carlsson, G.E.,
(1997). Bouchers Prosthodontic Treatment for
Edentulous Patients. 11th Edition. St. Louis: CV
Mosby.
20
Original Research
Abstract:
Introduction
Anatomical models are used for many diagnostic
and treatment purposes in the dental practice. A
dimensionally accurate impression, i.e. a negative
mould of the jaw, is important for fabricating a
precise anatomical model. The most commonly
used impression material is alginate, irreversible
hydrocolloid material. Alginates were originally
developed in the 1930s (Doubleday, 1998). The
main advantages of alginates are the ease of use,
cost-effectiveness, their hydrophilic characteristics,
and the good patient acceptability (Frey et al., 2005).
Although alginate is easy to manipulate, the correct
handling (water/powder ratio, spatulation) affects
dimensional accuracy of the material. Therefore, it is
imperative to follow the manufacturers prescriptions
on mixing (Caswell et al., 1986; Frey et al., 2005).
Significant differences were found between automixed and hand-mixed samples and between
control and disinfection samples. Automatic mixing
with disinfection gave casts that were the closest
representation of actual model.
millimeter (mm).
Result
Table (1) Measurements of typodont model and sample casts (hand-mixing
method)
Typodont model
Anterior
Premolar Molar
Anterior
Mean
(SD)
Premolar
Mean
(SD)
Molar
Mean
(SD)
Anterior
Mean
(SD)
Premolar
Mean
(SD)
Molar
Mean
(SD)
Tooth length
11.13
8.8
6.62
10.97
(0.07874)
8.51
(0.091378)
6.376
(0.013416)
11.042
(0.034205)
8.512
(0.050695)
6.496
(0.082037)
Edentulous
span length
9.08
14.28
16.63
9.108
(0.027749)
14.372
(0.099348)
16.762
(0.076616)
9.184
(0.074027)
14.55
(0.082765)
16.828
(0.112561)
Measurements
Table (2) Measurements of typodont model and sample casts (automatic mixing
method)
Typodont model
Anterior
Premolar Molar
Anterior
Mean
(SD)
Premolar
Mean
(SD)
Molar
Mean
(SD)
Anterior
Mean
(SD)
Premolar
Mean
(SD)
Molar
Mean
(SD)
Tooth length
11.13
8.8
6.62
11.078
(0.040866)
8.566
(0.065038)
6.518
(0.072595)
11.086
(0.06269)
8.636
(0.069857)
6.596
(0.02881)
Edentulous
span length
9.08
14.28
16.63
9.078
(0.034928)
14.332
(0.042661)
16.726
(0.078613)
9.152
(0.056303)
14.476
(0.086776)
16.8
(0.091924)
Measurements
23
24
Discussion
The statistical analysis showed that significant
differences were found in cast dimension and tooth
lengths between two mixing methods with or without
disinfection. Alginate impressions prepared with
automatic mixing method have better dimensional
accuracy than those mixed by hand. Koski showed
that alginate mixed with the device produced fewer
surface defects and had better detail reproduction
with cast gypsum than hand-mixing (Koski,
1997). Inoue et al. (2002) investigated the setting
characteristics and rheological properties of alginate
mixed by three methods: a hand-mixing technique,
a semi-automatic mixing instrument, and an automixed instrument. They found almost no porosities
using the auto-mixed instrument and concluded
that in clinical use, homogenous mix produced by
auto-mixed is preferred over hand mixing (Inoue et
al., 2002). Frey et al. (2005) used the Alginator II
(Cadco, Oxnard, CA), a semi-automatic mixer and
observed similar findings.
Conclusion
25
References
Ahmad S, Tredwin C J, Nesbit M, Moles D R 2007
Effect of immersion disinfection with Perform-ID
on alginate, an alginate alternative, an additioncured silicone and resultant type 3 gypsum casts
Caswell C W, von Gonten A S, Meng T R 1986
Volumetric proportioning techniques for irreversible
hydrocolloids: a comparative study. Journal of
American Dental Association 112:859-861
Chau V B, Saunders T R, Pimsler M, Elfring D R
1995 In depth disinfection of acrylic resins. Journal
of Prosthetic Dentistry 74:309-313
Conner C 1991 Cross-contamination control
in prosthodontic practice. Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry 4: 337-344
Dreesen K, Kellens A, Weavers M, Pushpike JT,
Willems G. The influence of mixing methods and
disinfectant on the physical properties of alginate
impression material. Eur J Orthod 2012; 10:1-7
Doubleday D 1998 Orthodontic products update.
British Journal Orthodontics 25: 133-140
Frey G, Lu H, Powers J 2005 Effect of mixing
methods on mechanical properties of alginate
impression materials. Journal of Prosthodontics 14:
221-225
Inoue K, Song Y X, Kamiunten O, Oku J, Terao T,
Fuji K 2002 Effect of mixing methods on rheological
properties of alginate impression materials. Journal
of Oral Rehabilitation 29: 615-619
Kotsiomiti E, Tzialla A, Hatjivasiliou K 2008
Accuracy and stability of impression materials
subjected to chemical disinfection-a literature
review. Journal of Rehabilitation 35:291-299
Sofou A, Larsen T, Fiehn N E, Owall B 2002
Contamination level of alginate impression arriving
at a dental laboratory. Clinical Oral Investigation 6:
161-165
26
Original Research
Abstract
Introduction
Groups
Group III - all the teeth were restored with gutta percha temporary stopping and Caviton
Group IV- all the teeth were restored with gutta percha temporary stopping and Kalzinol.
After the placement of the temporary restorative
materials into the prepared access cavities, the
radiographs of all specimens were taken to verify the
quality of coronal temporary restoration (figure 1).
Materials
Teeth
Caviton
10
II
Kalzinol
10
III
10
IV
10
Materials
Teeth
Caviton
10
II
Kalzinol
10
III
10
IV
10
28
Groups
Materials
Mean Ranks
2 days
7 days
p Value
Caviton
6.80
14.20
0.002*
II
Kalzinol
5.50
15.50
0.001*
III
Caviton &
gutta-percha
7.05
13.95
0.005*
IV
Kalzinol &
gutta-percha
5.50
15.50
0.001*
The results of statistical analysis made with MannWhitney U Test for the four experimental groups, as
a function of two immersion periods, in dye solution
are given in Table 3. At a significant level of p=0.05,
there was statistically significant difference between
two days immersion and 7 days immersion in
microleakage of each experimental group.
Results
In this study, the coronal microleakage in all
specimens was determined by measuring the extent
of linear dye penetration from margin of prepared
endodontic access cavity to floor of the pulp chamber.
Groups
Materials
Mean ranks
(2 days)
Caviton
11.3a
II
Kalzinol
28.25b
III
12.95a
IV
29.5b
p value
0.001
In Table 4, statistical analysis made with KruskalWallis Test at significant level of p=0.05 for two
days results were given, and there was statistically
significant difference among four experimental
groups on 2 days interval (p=0.001).
Figure 3. Photographic representation of dye
penetration in double and single sealing techniques
29
Caviton
10.05c
II
Kalzinol
30.5d
III
10.95c
Discussion
IV
30.5
Groups
Materials
p value
Mean ranks
(7days)
0.001
Group I
Group II
Group III
Group IV
0.001*
0.965
0.001*
0.001*
0.965
Group II
Group III
0.001*
Group I
Group II
Group III
Group II
Group III
Group IV
0.001*
0.952
0.001*
0.001*
1.000
0.001*
Conclusion
3.
For both temporary restorative materials,
viz, Caviton and Kalzinol, placement of gutta-percha
temporary stopping material as an additional layer
beneath each temporary restorative material to seal
the coronal access cavity did not improve the sealing
ability of each material at the two tested periods.
4.
Either Caviton or Kalzinol has to be chosen
as a temporary restorative material to seal the access
cavity; it is unwise to keep them in situ even up to
one week.
References
Biven, G.M., Bapna, M.S., Heuer, M.A., (1972).
Effect of eugenol and eugenol-containing root canal
sealers on the microhardness of human dentin.
Journal of Dental Research.52: pp.1602-1609.
Cruz, E.V., Shigetani, Y., Ishikawa, K., Kota, K.,
Iwaku, M., Goodis, H.E., (2002). A laboratory
study of coronal microleakage using four temporary
restorative materials. International Endodontic
Journal. 35: pp. 315-320.
31
32
Original research
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Successful crown and bridge works depend on
accurate impressions. Making the impressions
to duplicate the prepared tooth morphology and
surrounding tissues is an integral part of fixed
prosthodontic procedure. The clinical success of
fixed prosthodontic procedure is dependent, in
part, upon the dimensional accuracy of elastomeric
impression materials and impression procedures.
Therefore, dimensional accuracy of impression
materials is crucial to the quality of fixed
prosthodontic treatment.
When considering the replication process of which
impression making is a part, an understanding of
the accuracy required of an impression material is
essential (Wadhwani et al., 2005). A good impression
is critical for an accurately fitting restoration. Flaws
in the impressions will result in inaccuracies in
the casts. A small void in the impression caused
by trapping an air bubble on one of the occlusal
surfaces will result in a nodule on the occlusal table.
And then, it will lead to an inaccurate articulator
mounting, and the diagnostic data will be incorrect.
An accurate impression is critical to the attainment
of a precise fitting restoration (Eriksson et al.,
1998). This is one important factor that determines
33
RESULTS
Comparing the results of two different impression
materials, the mean values of diameter discrepancies
and percentage of deviations of the samples that
reproduced from master die 1 and master die
2 by using Zetaplus impression material were
significantly greater than that of Aquasil impression
material (p < 0.05).
The mean values of vertical height discrepancies
and percentage of deviations of the samples that
reproduced from master die 1 and master die
2 by using Zetaplus impression material were
significantly greater than that of Aquasil impression
material (p < 0.05).
DISCUSSION
35
REFERENCE LISTS
Berg,J.C., Johnson,G.H. and Lepe,X., (2003).
Temperature effects on the rheological properties
of current polyether and polysiloxane impression
materials during setting. Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry, 90: pp. 150-161.
CONCLUSION
Well-fitting indirect restorations can only be made
when there are accurate models of the oral tissues
available, made from high quality impressions.
A defective impression may lead to an inaccurate
model. Distortion of impression is a problem that is
inherent in all of the steps involved in fabricating an
indirect restoration and yield poor result.
Table 1. The discrepancies and percentage of deviations calculated for the diameter of the samples
reproduced from master die 1 and master die 2
Diameter Discrepancy = Diameter of stone dieDiameter of master die
Aquasil
Diameter
Discrepancies
Serial No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Zetaplus
Die 1
Die 2
0.22
0.20
0.20
0.21
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.20
0.07
0.08
0.12
0.10
0.11
0.11
0.12
0.09
0.09
0.07
Percentage of
Deviation
Die 1
3.13
2.85
2.85
2.99
2.85
2.85
2.85
2.85
2.71
2.85
Diameter
Discrepancies
Percentage of
Deviation
Die 2
Die 1
Die 2
Die 1
Die 2
1.15
1.31
1.96
1.64
1.80
1.80
1.96
1.47
1.47
1.15
0.48
0.48
0.46
0.38
0.41
0.38
0.29
0.19
0.20
0.19
0.12
0.10
0.13
0.13
0.12
0.13
0.10
0.09
0.09
0.13
6.84
6.84
6.55
5.41
5.84
5.41
4.13
2.71
2.85
2.71
1.96
1.64
2.13
2.13
1.96
2.13
1.64
1.47
1.47
2.13
Table 2. The results of statistical analysis made by using unpaired students t test for the diameter
discrepancies and percentage of deviations at a significant level of p=0.05
Master Die 1 group
Impression
Materials
Aquasil
Zetaplus
p value
Discrepancies in
mm
(Mean SD)
Percentage of
Deviation
(MeanSD)
Discrepancies in
mm
(Mean SD)
Percentage of
Deviation
(MeanSD)
0.202
(0.0079)
0.346
(0.1195)
2.878
(0.1104)
4.929
(1.7007)
0.096
(0.019)
0.114
(0.0171)
1.571
(0.3082)
1.866
(0.2813)
0.001
0.001
0.039
0.038
37
Table 3. The discrepancies and percentage of deviations calculated for the vertical height of the samples
reproduced from master die 1 and master die 2
Height Discrepancy = Height of stone die Height of master die
Aquasil
Serial
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Height Discrepancies
Zetaplus
Height
Discrepancies
Percentage of Deviation
Percentage
of Deviation
Die 1
Die 2
Die1
Die2
Die 1
Die 2
Die1
Die 2
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.02
1.72
1.89
2.07
2.07
2.07
0.53
0.18
0.35
0.53
0.35
-0.48
-0.48
-0.21
-0.23
-0.17
-0.09
-0.10
-0.10
-0.08
-0.08
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.01
0.03
1.89
1.89
1.89
1.89
1.89
0.53
0.70
0.53
0.18
0.53
-0.16
-0.16
-0.16
-0.14
-0.14
-0.07
-0.07
-0.05
-0.03
-0.05
-8.26
-8.26
-3.61
-3.96
-2.93
-2.75
-1.58
-1.76
-1.76
-1.41
-1.41
-1.23
-2.75
-2.75
-2.41
-2.41
-1.23
-0.88
-0.53
-0.88
Table 4. The results of statistical analysis made by using unpaired students t test for the vertical height
discrepancies and percentage of deviations at a significant level of p=0.05
Master Die 1 group
Impression
Materials
Aquasil
Zetaplus
p value
Discrepancies in
mm
(Mean SD)
Percentage of
Deviation
(MeanSD)
Discrepancies in
mm
(Mean SD)
Percentage of
Deviation
(MeanSD)
0.112
(0.0063)
-0.233
(0.1333)
1.927
(0.1118)
-4.009
(2.2934)
0.025
(0.0097)
-0.072
(0.0203)
0.441
(0.1698)
-1.267
(0.4042)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
38
Figure 4. Stone dies casted from Stainless steel die number: 1 by Aquasil impression material
39
Figure 5. Stone dies casted from Stainless steel die number: 1 by Zetaplus impression material
Figure 6. Stone dies casted from Stainless steel die number: 2 by Aquasil impression material
Figure 7. Stone dies casted from Stainless steel die number: 2 by Zetaplus impression material
40
Original Research
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
41
Results
REFERENCES
G.,Schmitter,M.,(2005).Clinical performance of
metal-free polymer crowns after 3 years in service. J
Dent, 33: pp.517-523.
Figure 3. Points of measurement of the marginal
gap (in non-cemented crown)
Margin
design
number
Mean (m)
Standard
deviation
(m)
90 rounded
shoulder
18
65.43
25.79
18
70.43
30.36
18
59.17
20.91
54
65.01
25.90
Chamfer
110 sloped
shoulder
Total
Sum of
Squares
Degree
of
freedom
Mean
Square
F
ratio
p
value
.849
.434
Between
Groups
1145.342
572.671
Within
Groups
34420.462
51
674.911
35565.804
53
Total
46
Margin design
Number
Mean (m)
SD (m)
90rounded
shoulder
10
46.99
34.90
Chamfer
10
58.19
21.84
110sloped
shoulder
10
43.87
17.38
Total
30
49.68
25.67
Degree
of
freedom
Mean
Square
F ratio
0.851734
0.437
Between
Groups
1134.06
567.0301
Within
Groups
17974.88
27
665.7364
Total
19108.94
29
47
Case Report
Oral and maxillofacial surgical ward, (1000) Bedded Naypyitaw General Hospital, Department of Health
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Dental Medicine (Yangon), Department of Medical Science
Abstract
Case report
A five-day old male infant, born on 26th May 2012
was referred to oral and maxillofacial surgical ward
of (1000) Bedded Naypyitaw General Hospital from
Taungoo General Hospital with chief compliant of
congenital anomaly in tongue. By history taking, it
was known that he was delivered at Swa Hospital of
Yedashe Township in Bago Division, as emergency
LSCS, and weighed 2.7 kg at birth. There was no
congenital anomaly in family and the 28-year old
mother already had had a normal child.
On clinical examination, there was abnormal
attachment of the tongue tip to anterior part of palate
about 5-7 mm (fig-1), and the patient also seems to
have slight micrognathic appearance (Fig-2).
Fig-1 photograph showing abnormal adhesion of
tongue tip to palate
Management
Supportive care
Since the infant had attached tongue to the palate,
limitation of tongue movement was present and
cannot perform suckling action. Consultation with
pediatrician was urgently done for feeding problem,
and supportive care.
To find out if the patient had other congenital
anomalies or not and for supportive care, the infant
had been transferred out to the Child ward of (1000)
Bedded Naypyitaw Hospital. He had given test
feeding of 50cc/3hrly through naso-gastric tube from
that day onwards. Necessary investigations were
made by pediatrician and no signs and symptoms
of syndromic condition were found. When the
patient was nine days old, he was referred back to
OMFS ward for further management of superior
ankyloglossia.
50
51
52
After
Before
Photographs courtesy of
Dr. Sushil Koirala
Before
After
Benefits ...
BeautiBond
One-Step Bonding
System
Polishability
a 8 years of Clinical Success
a Anti-Plaque Effect
(with S-PRG filler) exhibits
sporadic plaque formation on
restored tooth surface
authorized dealer:
53
54
55
56
LEADERSHIP
MADE IN ITALY
KROMOPAN, a revolution in the dental world for easy to take, high quality dental impressions. With the chromatic phase indicator
(LASCOD patent) you visually control the different working phases avoiding useless and costly waste of time. KROMOPAN success
story is strictly linked to its adaptability to different techniques, diverse clinical case requirements as well as to your habits and countrys climate. Easy to use, accurate and stable over time KROMOPAN simplify your daily operating requirements.
LASCOD S.p.A. - Via L. Longo, 18 - 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy - tel.: +39 055 4215768 - e-mail: [email protected]
www.lascod.com
57
QUITANET PLUS
Concentrated cleaning and disinfection solution for dental instruments
INDICATIONS
Active against HIV 1, Herpes virus and PRV (surrogate of HBV) in 5 min, 0.1%, 20C, against BVDV
(surrogate of HCV) in 10 min, 0.25%, 20C and against Influenza virus A [H1N1] in 5 min, 0.75%, 20C.
58
SHOFU
Technique Kits
Your Answer to Satiny-smooth Polish
A comprehensive range of
well-organized Technique Kits
from the Leader in Abrasives
Carefully selected to meet all
your polishing needs for ceramics,
resin composites, glass ionomer and
silver amalgam
10 Science Park Road, #03-12 The Alpha, Science Park ll, Singapore 117684
Tel: 65-6377 2722 Fax: 65-6377 1121 eMail: [email protected] www.shofu.com.sg
59
60