Print All Ijsrp-P1930
Print All Ijsrp-P1930
Print All Ijsrp-P1930
ISSN 2250-3153
I. INTRODUCTION
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
Figure 3. The fluence, of X-rays decreases with the square of the distance from the source.
The Intensity of x-rays
The intensity of the X-ray beam is attenuated by absorption
and scattering process as it passes through the filter and patient.
The degree of attenuation depends on the energy spectrum of the
X-ray, path and (x) i.e.the X-ray linear attenuation coefficient
which varies for different materials and tissues and hence is a
function of distance x through the medium.
The integral of the attenuation coefficient is given by
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
Advantages
1
Widely
used
available
2
Experts available
3
4
and
High-spatial resolution
Excellent imaging of
hard tissues (bones)
Disadvantages
Radiation exposure
Difficulty in imaging softtissues
2D projection, hidden parts
Energy transfer
There are two basic types of energy transfer that may occur
when X-rays interact with matter:
1.
2.
Fig 5: Photon interactions as a relation between photon energy and atomic number of filters
The major interaction between X-rays and matter occurs in
the following ways;
Coherent (Rayleigh) scattering
The photoelectric effect
The Compton effect
Pair Production
Photodisintegration
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
h is Plancks constant
mo is rest mass of electron
c is the speed of light
is the scattering angle
The quantity hme is known as the Compton Scattering of
the electron; it is equal to 2.431012 m. The wavelength shift
is at least zero (for = 0) and at most twice the Compton
wavelength of the electron (for = 180).
The Compton effect will occur with very low atomic
weight targets even at relatively low X-ray energies. The effect
may be thought of as a scattering of the photons by atomic
electrons. In the process, also called Compton scattering, the
incident X-ray changes direction and loses energy, imparting that
energy to the electron (now called a Compton electron).
The Compton electron will typically interact with other
atoms producing secondary ionizations. Since they possess
relatively low energy, the x-rays produced will generally be low
energy also.
The maximum possible energy, E, of a Compton electron
(the Compton edge) is equal to:
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
ii.
iii.
iv.
Filtration
Photo interaction with the object (patient)
Anti-scatter device
v.
10
Image detection
III. CONCLUSION
What radiation effect will be dominant is a function
primarily of the energy of the radiation and the mass of the
absorbing medium. The photoelectric effect, Compton scattering,
pair production, Thomson or Rayleigh scattering, and
photodisintegration are the main processes that can occur. At the
low energies involved in X-ray diffraction, the processes are
limited to Compton scattering, Thomson/Rayleigh scattering and
the photoelectric effect.
The common product of these types of x-ray interaction
with matter is the production of high-speed electrons and x-rays
that can cause secondary effects in the matter with which they
interact. The end effect (which can cause significant damage in
tissues, particularly at the low X-ray energies involved in
diffraction) of heat production is preceded by interactions, which
create excited atoms, additional free electrons from ionization,
and low-energy X-rays. These can do significant molecular
damage (including chromosomal damage in tissues) leading to a
number adverse health effects. Also to note is that the kV
determines type of interaction in the body
As kV increases photoelectric decreases (everything is
penetrated)
As kV decreases photoelectric increases (more absorption
by thicker or denser tissues)
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 7, July 2013
ISSN 2250-3153
T. R Fewell, R. E. Shuping and K. R. Hawkins, Handbook of computed
tomography X-ray spectra, HHS Publication FDA Rockville: Maryland,
1981, pp 51-55
[6] ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements)
(1980): Report 33. Radiation quantities and units.
[7] James R. Connolly. The Interaction of X-rays with Matter and Radiation
Safety Introduction to X-Ray Powder Diffraction, 2012, EPS400-002.
[8] Jan Kybic. Atomic Energy Regulatory Board AERB SAFETY CODE NO.
AERB/SC/MED-2 (Rev. 1); SAFETY CODE FOR MEDICAL
DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATIONS, Mumbai
400 094.
[9] M. R. Madan, B. Georg, K. Willi, G. J. Stephen, G. Lena, M. Takamichi, S.
P. Shrimpton Managing patient dose in computed tomography,
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication
87, 2000. Vol 30(3), pp 1 - 45.
[10] A. A. Okunade Numerical Models for comparing filter materials for
diagnostic radiology, Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2002, Vol. 65. 1-9.
[5]
11
AUTHORS
First Author Odeh Daniel Odeh - Department of Physics,
Nigerian Defence Academy, [email protected]
Second Author G. O Ogbanje, Department of Physics,
Nigerian Defence Academy
Third Author Prof. S. A. Jonah, Department of Physics,
Nigerian Defence Academy
www.ijsrp.org