The Branding of Club Atletico de Madrid Local or Global
The Branding of Club Atletico de Madrid Local or Global
The Branding of Club Atletico de Madrid Local or Global
Putro,
2016.
NA0369
t was the end of the 2007/2008 football season1 and Club Atltico
de Madrid appeared to have turned a corner in terms of
performance on the field. fte Club had recently completed its best
season in ten years, finishing fourth in Spains top professional league.2
However, the Clubs revenue growth did not match expectations. Just one
year earlier, CEO Miguel Angel Gil Marin had stated the following goal:
our brand will help us to double revenues in two years.3 Although he
had added that the Atltico Madrid brand was a valuable asset very
familiar among Spaniards, he had also admitted that the Club would
need to adapt to the increasing globalization of
football.4
Atltico Madrid was often overshadowed on the international stage by
cross-town rival, Real Madrid, and other European clubs.5 Moreover, its
revenues paled in com- parison to many of the more globally
recognized football clubs and it had not had an operating profit since
before 2000.6 fte Club was committed to increasing revenue through
a renewed focus on marketing and brand building intended to increase
aware- ness and attractiveness of the Atltico Madrid brand.7 But how
could the Club achieve this? Should and could it try to make Atltico
Madrid a household name around the world?
History
a nd
This document is authorized for use only by Utomo Sarjono Putro in 2016.
This document is authorized for use only by Utomo Sarjono Putro in 2016.
Year
Revenue
Operating Profit
Net Profit
2007/2008
74.5
46.5
0.2
2006/2007
60.8
33.6
0.5
2005/2006
51.0
34.5
3.4
2004/2005
46.8
41.0
40.5
2003/2004
35.6
49.4
36.6
2002/2003
32.6
57.1
26.2
2001/2002
15.5
58.2
10.1
2000/2001
13.1
50.0
1.1
1.9
2007/2008
2006/2007
2005/2006
5,457,111
3,888,476
3,374,635
Broadcasting Revenue
28,453,245
23,381,477
18,251,608
Commercial Revenue
22,088,626
18,613,351
15,986,489
Socios Revenue
18,541,542
14,899,701
13,346,253
Total Income
74,540,524
60,783,005
50,958,985
5,315,037
4,658,001
3,233,295
Personnel
65,893,428
52,254,071
48,398,504
14,463,831
15,159,944
12,500,261
Amortization
35,382,584
22,334,241
21,310,412
Total Expenses
121,054,880
94,406,257
85,442,472
OPERATING PROFIT
(46,514,356)
(33,623,252)
(34,483,487)
Extraordinary Income
66,903,383
43,708,223
49,744,241
Extraordinary Expenses
(6,536,274)
(725,864)
(4,027,706)
13,852,753
9,359,107
11,233,048
704,600
53,705
26,123
(12,302,417)
(6,919,714)
(5,943,193)
2,254,936
2,493,098
5,315,978
TAXES
1,971,740
1,968,648
1,893,399
283,196
524,450
3,422,579
INCOME
Match Day Revenue
EXPENSES
Supplies
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS
Interest Income
Interest Expense
NET PROFIT
2007/2008
2006/2007
2005/2006
97,608,042
91,066,472
60,758,807
1,167,183
6,312,514
6,128,670
354,751,525
307,817,890
350,638,898
FIXED ASSETS
453,526,750
405,196,876
417,526,375
497,258
445,395
406,074
Accounts Receivable
64,497,351
72,156,218
50,378,706
15,891,386
28,398,832
19,843,165
CURRENT ASSETS
80,885,995
101,000,445
70,627,945
3,181,756
16,768,786
9,088,931
537,594,501
522,966,107
497,243,251
15,536,638
24,706,670
24,549,836
7,785,231
3,309,258
(1,781,051)
23,321,869
28,015,928
22,768,785
200,883,932
159,880,787
241,033,013
81,230,575
57,598,929
45,107,035
282,114,507
217,479,716
286,140,048
RESERVES
52,213,366
57,598,929
45,107,035
Short-Term Creditors
44,495,735
46,430,290
31,007,896
105,157,248
75,913,119
51,279,791
79,323,385
138,358,268
96,957,323
SHORT-TERM DEBT
228,976,368
260,701,677
179,245,010
586,626,110
563,796,250
533,260,878
Intangible Assets
Tangible Assets
Inventory
CASH
TOTAL ASSETS
Issued Share Capital
Other Shareholder Equity
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Long-Term Creditors
Other Long-Term Debt
LONG-TERM DEBT
Accounts Payable
FIXED
ASSETS
CURRENT TOTAL
ASSETS ASSETS
NET
EQUITY
LONGTERM DEBT
SHORTTERM DEBT
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
Real Madrid
477.3
190.0
668.2
141.1
246.6
280.5
658.2
F.C. Barcelona
297.2
100.1
397.3
8.5
200.9
187.9
397.3
60.1
42.2
102.3
27.7
14.1
60.5
102.3
Valencia C.F.
145.1
119.7
264.8
21.4
161.8
124.4
254.8
Villareal C.F.
88.9
54.0
142.9
0.9
96.6
45.4
142.9
Real Zaragoza
25.2
36.3
61.6
21.8
43.5
39.9
142.9
Atltico Madrid
405.2
101.0
523.0
28.0
217.5
260.7
563.8
Real Recreativo
13.8
3.8
17.6
5.1
5.1
1.5
17.6
Getafe C.F.
18.7
9.9
28.6
4.2
4.2
3.5
28.6
Real Racing
96.1
20.7
116.8
10.7
107.3
20.2
116.8
R.C.D. Espanyol
76.8
50.9
127.7
25.5
50.1
52.1
127.7
R.C.D. Mallorca
36.1
28.9
65.0
1.7
15.4
47.9
65.0
120.8
120.7
241.5
15.3
190.4
35.8
241.5
C.A. Osasuna
33.9
31.7
65.6
16.8
16.7
32.1
65.6
Levante U.D.
23.4
21.3
44.7
8.2
1.5
35.0
44.7
Real Betis
54.9
23.4
78.3
18.4
19.1
40.8
78.3
Ath. Bilbao
32.1
12.2
44.3
4.5
14.5
34.3
44.3
R.C. Celta
38.1
21.4
59.5
5.7
18.7
35.1
59.5
Real Sociedad
31.3
15.5
46.9
5.6
13.9
27.4
46.9
0.5
3.1
3.7
1.9
1.8
3.7
Sevilla C.F.
R.C. Deportivo
Gimnastic
Sources: Saludas, J.M.G. (2009). Ftbol & finanzas: La economa de la Liga de las estrellas (I). Partida Doble, 209(April): 6289;
Club Atltico de Madrid. (2009). Retrieved
Although CEO Gil Marin denied his Club had a reputation for
failure, stating, We arent satisfied with being second to Real Madrid,
many of its fans still referred to the Club as born losers.37 ftis
preference for the underdog even affected consump- tion behavior by
Atltico Madrid fans, a fact that was certainly evident to sponsors. In
fact, a Spanish branding company claimed that Atltico Madrid fans
tended to favor underdog brandsthey were more likely to drink gin
with Kas (a secondary soft drink brand) than with Fanta, own a Sharp
television instead of a Samsung or LG, and vote for fringe political
parties.38
in
spain
Competition
Spanish Competition
Since the beginning of the twentieth century, Atltico Madrid competed
with its cross- town rival Real Madrid, much like the Yankees and
Mets baseball rivalry in New York City. Prosperous young professionals
favored Real Madrid along with legions of working-class supporters.46
Many considered Atltico Madrid less socially prestigious, but the Club
boasted two million fans, drawn overwhelmingly from Madrids southern industrial suburbs.47 ftese suburbs consisted of large numbers of
working class migrants from poorer parts of Spainan audience that
Atltico Madrid appealed to as the underdog.48
Clubs Real Madrid and FC Barcelona had dominated La Liga for many
years. By the end of the 2007/2008 season, Real Madrid had won La
Liga a record thirty-one times and been runner-up sixteen times.49 It
had also won a record nine European Cups.50 FC Barcelona had won
La Liga eighteen times and been runner-up twenty- two times. It had
also won two European Cups.51 ftese two clubs were among the
richest clubs in the worldReal Madrid ranked number one with
revenues of 365.8 million and FC Barcelona ranked third with 308.8
52
(Exhibit
5).Clubs
Exhibit 5: Themillion
Top 20
Football
in the World by Revenue, 2007/2008
Rank
Club
Revenue
( million)
Country
1.
Real Madrid
365.8
Spain
2.
Manchester United
324.8
England
3.
FC Barcelona
308.8
Spain
4.
Bayern Munich
295.3
Germany
5.
Chelsea
268.8
England
6.
Arsenal
264.4
England
7.
Liverpool
210.9
England
8.
AC Milan
209.5
Italy
9.
AS Roma
175.4
Italy
10. Internazionale
172.9
Italy
11.
Juventus
167.5
Italy
12. Olympique Lyonnais
155.7
France
13. Schalke 04
148.4
Germany
14. Tottenham Hotspur
145.0
England
15. Hamburger SV
127.9
Germany
16. Olympique de Marseille
126.8
France
17. Newcastle United
125.6
England
18. VfB Stuttgart
111.5
Germany
19. Fenerbahce
111.3
Turkey
Sources: Adapted from Football Money League by Deloitte Sports Business Group. (2009);
20.
Manchester
City
104.0
England
Deloitte Football Money League. (2008); Club Atltico de Madrid. (2009). Retrieved from http:// en.clubatleticodemadrid.com/atm/atletico-de-madrid.
european Competition
Each country in Europe had its own league of clubs. However, like the
political and economic landscape, football competition had regionalized
within Europe and was administered and controlled by UEFA.56 ftough
similar organizations existed region- ally throughout the world, the large
majority of the top players in the world played on European clubs.
Moreover, the twenty richest football clubs in the world during the
2007/2008 season were all European.57
Football was no longer only about what took place on the field.
European foot- ball clubs, in particular, had begun to transform
themselves into modern sports and media companies, branding teams
and individual players, and generating significant licensing and retail
revenues (Exhibit 6 lists major broadcasting contract agreements and
Exhibit 7 lists Atltico Madrids sponsors).58 A study by Deloitte found
that the top five revenue teams in Deloittes Money League were global
clubs with significant and growing international support (Exhibit 8).59
Deloitte divided revenue into three categories: match day (revenue
derived from gate receipts, including season and mem- berships),
broadcast (revenue from both domestic and international competitions),
and 6:
commercial
from Contracts
sponsorshipsfor
and
merchandising).
Exhibit
Selected(revenue
Broadcast
the
Big Five Leagues
League
Rights Winner
Duration
Start
Average rightsEstimated increase
fees per seasonover previous (m)contract %
3 years
2007/2008
1,335
70
French Ligue 1
Canal Plus/Orange
4 years
2008/2009
668
German Bundesliga
Sirius
6 years
2009/2010
500
20
AC Milan
Mediaset
2 years
2007/2008
110
10
Juventus
Mediaset
3 years
2007/2008
110
35
Internazionale
Mediaset
2 years
2007/2008
100
10
AS Roma
Mediaset
2 years
2007/2008
65
25
Real Madrid
Mediapro
7 years
2006/2007
155
70
FC Barcelona
Mediapro
7 years
2006/2007
145
80
Italian Serie A:
Source: Adapted from Football Money League by Deloitte Sports Business Group. (2009, 2008).
Valencia
RTW
5 years
2009/2010
30
Atltico de Madrid
Telemadrid
5 years
2009/2010
42
110
Nike:
Kyocera:
PAF:
On shorts and training kits; official gaming website, on website, and in club
magazines.
La Caixa:
Coca-Cola:
magazines. Mahou:
Banesto:
Official travel partner; makes travel arrangements for club and packages
for fans, on website, and in club magazines.
Hugo Boss:
Clothing for first team and coaching staff; on website and in club
MasterCard, on
10
Source: Adapted from Football Money League by Deloitte Sports Business Group. (2009).
Club
Unique Visitors
Worldwide (000)
Home
Country
Non-Home
Country
Manutd.com
Manchester United
2,218
43%
57%
Liverpoolfc.tv
Liverpool
1,497
53%
47%
Arsenal.com
Arsenal
1,435
47%
53%
RealMadrid.com
Real Madrid
1,137
33%
67%
FCBarcelona.com
Barcelona
1,053
26%
74%
ChelseaFC.com
Chelsea
1,000
38%
62%
ACMilan.com
AC Milan
825
34%
66%
Inter.it
Inter Milan
824
49%
51%
Juventus.com
Juventus
619
31%
69%
Om.net
Marseille
531
82%
18%
PSG.fr
Paris St Germain
413
77%
23%
Olweb.fr
Lyon
319
78%
22%
Clubatleticodemadrid.com
Atltico Madrid
219
73%
27%
Sources: comScore World Metrix. (2008, March 19). comScore Releases February 2008 U.S. Search Engine
Rankings. Retrieved from Club Atltico de Madrid. (2009). Retrieved from Club Atltico de Madrid.
*Unique visitors worldwide aged 15+, excludes traffic from public computers such as Internet cafes, or access from mobile phones or PD
For most of the European clubs, the source of losses and of debt
varied, but was often due to overpaying for players in the transfer
market.68 For example, Real Madrid paid $86 million for Zinedine
Zidane in 2001 and $42 million for David Beckham in 2002, and still
only managed to finish fourth in La Liga in 2003.69 Some leading clubs
chose to develop talent internally through football academies rather
than recruit from the transfer market.70 For example, Barcelona
produced more elite young talent than any other club, spending over 6
million on their youth academy.71
Ironically, the football clubs that had attempted to run clubs for a
profit had gen- erally failed when it came to wins. Many industry
experts claimed that debt was the best way to succeed and that an
operating profit was nothing more than unrealized potential.72 So how
did clubs finance the debt? Local governments were often will- ing to
provide a bailout for fear of losing the team. And when governments
were not available, wealthy owners were. ftese owners usually operated on
the assumption that revenue streams would eventually counter the debts
incurred, especially as the global market for football continued to grow
Real Madrid
Most experts viewed Real Madrid as the most successful football club in
Spain, one of the most successful in the world, and a true global
brand.75 Real Madrid was a democratically elected, nonprofit
association owned by its 70,000 members, or socios. As such, the Club
did not have access to capital from a wealthy owner but rather had
traditionally been dependent upon annual fees paid by socios.76
Because of this limited access to capital, Real Madrid sold non-core
assets in the 2000s, such as training fields, and began focusing on core
assets such as VIP boxes in Santiago Bernabu stadium.77 Season ticket
holders held nearly all seats in the stadium.78 fte Club also established a
stand-alone marketing organization, Sociedad Mixta, to manage all
broadcasting, licensing, and merchandising rights. Sociedad Mixta sold
shares to major Spanish companies and paid a percentage of income
directly to Real Madrid.79
Real Madrid management recognized the significance of branding,
studying audi- ence demographics, and developing ways to engage and
interact with fans both on and off the field.80 Real Madrid managers
actually studied how Disney marketed the film The Lion King. ftey
learned that selling tickets to the movie was not the primary source of
revenue. Instead, the real returns were in spin-offs and merchandising. 81
fte Club had recently toured Asia, the United States, and India,
playing exhibition matches against local teams in order to further build
the brand.82 In fact, Real Madrid had helped to attract the largest
attendance ever66,830to Seattles Qwest Field when it played D.C.
United there in 2006.83 Real Madrids president Ramon Calderon had
recently stated, We are trying to increase the potential of our
brand. fte idea is to be more and more popular in the rest of the world.
We have been popular in Spain and Europe for a long, long time.84
Some of its other global moves included:
Manchester United
Manchester United (Man. U.) was the largest and most successful club
in the English Premier League, having won the league seventeen times
and was champion of Europe three times.95 Many considered Man. U.
the industry standard for managing a football club brand.96 fte Man. U.
brand was viewed as a global brand and was believed by some to
be the most valuable sports brand in the world.97 fte club had
managed its brand as a strategic asset for years.98
From a financial perspective, Man. U. was one of the first clubs to
raise capital by issuing shares on a stock exchange (the London Stock
Exchange in 1991). ftis access to capital enabled club management to
purchase star players and upgrade its stadium amenities. Man. U.
management viewed its fans as customers and employed customer
relationship management (CRM) software to enhance the value it
delivered. fte soft- ware enabled management to use marketing
analytics to build a single view of each supporter and all transactions
with the Club, and to better segment and price matches and ticket
packages.99
Man. U. had been especially successful at generating revenue
beyond match-day. fte presence of star players and wins on the field
enabled the Club to attract valuable sponsorship deals and
broadcasting rights, such as a four-year 56.5 million deal with AIG in
2006.100 fte Club tried to select global sponsors that could add value
to the brand. For example, in partnering with Lycos, the firm helped to
develop foreign- language websites, and in partnering with Dimension
Data, the firm implemented a customer-relations management
system.101 fte Club was also innovative in terms of generating revenue
from other sources, such as soccer schools, a dedicated television/ website
channel, and even a mobile phone service with Vodafone. fte Clubs
global television channel, MUTV, delivered Man. U. programming to fiftyfour countries around the world.102
ftough the Club still generated the majority of its revenues from the
U.K. market, its brand was expanding quickly into Asia.103 It had made a
number of global moves in recent years, including:
Playing exhibition matches against local teams in the U.S. and Asia.104
14
Arsenal
Arsenal Football Club was a member of the English Premier League,
and, while not as successful as Manchester United, had won thirteen
Premier League titles.111 Many sports marketers viewed Arsenal as a model
club for brand building, particularly given the fact that it had not won any
championships in the past few years but still ranked as one of the
most valuable football brands in the world, according to Deloitte.112
fte key strategy for the Club was self-sufficiency through revenue
generation from match day, broadcast, and commercial revenue, rather
than by being dependent on investments from one wealthy benefactor.
Club management believed that this strat- egy could insulate the Club
from poor performance on the field.113
Unlike some other major clubs, Arsenal did not have a large
benefactor. ftere were several major shareholders along with a number
of minor shareholders.114 fte Arse- nal Supporters Trust, which consisted
of 200,000 paid members, also owned a small number of shares. ftis
gave Arsenal the largest paid membership for a football club in the
world.115 fte Club also placed an emphasis on building new fans and
delivering experiences and relationships with these fans.116 Tactics
included club-level seats and private boxes in Emirates Stadium, loyalty
schemes through direct mail and using its website, and a membership
tier for younger fans (which included reduced ticket prices and access to
special events).
Arsenal had just moved into a new 430 million 60,000-seat
stadium, part of an overall strategy to build revenues outside of match
days.117 fte stadium played host to events such as conferences and
music concerts in addition to football matches. It also welcomed
thousands of tourists for stadium tours and an Arsenal Football Club
museum. Arsenal management attempted to attract sponsors with
premium brands and a global presence, including Emirates Airline and
mobile provider O2.118 Manage- ment also had begun to focus on
reaching international markets, especially in Asia and the Middle
East.119 fte Club had pursued a number of global moves, including:
Total
AFC
CAF
CONCACAF
CONMEBOL
OFC
UEFA
Players (000)
264,552
85,176
46,300
43,109
27,778
542
61,647
Male (000)
238,557
80,075
44,940
33,071
24,703
486
55,283
Female (000)
25,995
5,102
1,361
10,038
3,074
56
6,364
Referees and
Officials (000)
5,058
673
630
1,133
168
32
2,422
Total in football
(000)
269,610
85,849
46,930
44,242
27,946
573
64,069
% of population
4.13
2.22
5.16
8.53
7.47
4.68
7.59
16
Source: Vpel, H., and Steinhardt, M. (2008). Wirtschaftsfaktor fuball. Retrieved from fileadmin/hwwi/Publikationen/Partnerpublikati
Country
Number
of Players
(millions)
Rank
Country
Players as %
of Population
China
26.2
Costa Rica
27
U.S.A.
24.5
Germany
20
India
20.6
Faroe Islands
17
Germany
16.3
Guatemala
16
Brazil
13.2
Chile
16
Source: Vpel, H. and Steinhardt, M. (2008). Wirtschaftsfaktor fuball. Retrieved from http://www.
hwwi.org/fileadmin/hwwi/Publikationen/Partnerpublikationen/HSH/Fussballstudie_14_B.pdf.
the crowds that showed up for Mexico matches when they played in the
United States to
recognize the power of the Hispanic market in the Americas. 144
With over forty-two million Hispanics, the U.S. Hispanic market was
already larger than four of the six Spanish-speaking countries that
played in the 2006 World Cup.145 In fact, a number of professional MLS
football clubs in the U.S. had begun to target Hispanic fans.146
Advertisers spent almost $250 million in 2007 on Spanish-language
18
Country
Percent of
Host Country
Population in 2000
Rank
Country
Number of
Foreign-born in
2000 (millions)
U.A.E.
70.4
United States
34.6
Saudi Arabia
23.9
Russia
11.9
Switzerland
21.8
Germany
9.1
Australia
21.4
France
6.3
Canada
18.1
India
6.3
Cote dIvoire
14.0
Canada
5.7
United States
12.2
Ukraine
5.5
Germany
11.9
Saudi Arabia
5.3
Austria
11.4
U.K.
4.9
10
France
10.6
10
Pakistan
4.2
football Consumers
fte consumer market for football included everyone from those who
attended live matches, to those who watched or listened to matches
through various media outlets, bought fan memorabilia, supported
team sponsors, or simply read about the club in the newspaper. Of
those who attended live football matches, the Handbook on the
Economics of Sport divided them into three different categories:152
Members who bought a season ticket for either half or the whole season.
Paying spectators who bought a ticket for a particular match.
Guests, who benefited from the clubs social initiatives and did
not pay to see a match.
the most passionate buyers in the world. Although support for a football
club might be equated to other forms of product loyalty, support for a
football club often went beyond loyalty into the realm of passion and
love.154 For instance, fanatics of a football club felt that the club
belonged to them and often even took credit for wins on the field.
Such supporters budgeted significant amounts of money for sports, were
regular television viewers, read sports articles, bought merchandise, and
had a high emotional attachment to a sports franchise. ftese super
supporters did not fit traditional eco- nomic models of rational behavior;
they behaved irrationally, supporting their team in good times and bad
rather than simply changing teams when their team began to lose.
Atltico Madrid supporters were often cited as examples of such
fanatical behavior.155 It was important for football clubs to attract fans at
an early age, as studies had shown that most football fans chose a club
as a child and few changed their preference later in life.156
Sports consumption was somewhat inelastic among loyal fans although
there were also bandwagon supporters (people who claimed to be a fan
of a team, but only when their team was winning; they were less likely
to attend matches or own team merchan- dise). An editorial in USA
Today described such behavior well: We live in an age in which its easy
to simply follow the winners. ftanks to incessant merchandising and a
multitude of sports television channels, we can proudly adopt whatever
team is enjoy- ing a good run.157 Moreover, such supporters were often
more likely to be non-local than those considered fanatics. However, they
were also what the club needed to attract because with them came more
revenue from television contracts and licensing.158
fte motivations behind football consumption were not identical from
country to country according to one respected sports marketing
agency.159 fte most important motive behind football consumption for
English and German fans was devotion to a specific club, whereas
French fans were more motivated by the pure enjoyment of the game
itself rather than the teams involved and the outcome of the match.
Chinese football fans did not yet have deep loyalties to specific clubs
and were motivated by an overall love for the game. ftus, Chinese were
more attracted to the top clubs simply because many of the worlds
best players played for such clubs. Nostalgia often played a role for
consumers around the world who had emigrated from Europe and Latin
America to other countries.160
In Spain, over half of the population considered themselves soccer
fans.161 In fact, a recent study found that more than 60 percent of
Spanish fans planned their lives around the next football match, 69
percent said they performed some superstitious ritual in order to help
their team win, and 70 percent claimed they preferred watching the
match to making love.162 Although Real Madrid and Barcelona claimed
the most fans throughout Spain, most Spanish clubs drew their fans
from within the region in which the club was located.163
tHe future
20
notes
1. When football appears alone in this case, the word denotes
soccer in Aus- tralia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the
United States. When referring to indigenous forms of football in
34. Ibid.
35. Marketingdirecto.com. (2007). El Atltico de Madrid Apuesta
por
el
Marketing.
Retrieved
from
http://www.marketingdirecto.com/actualidad/ publicidad/el-atletico-demadrid-apuesta-por-el-marketing/#sthash.3lFdkRlF. dpuf.
36. Talbot, S. (2006).
37. Duff, A. (2007).
38. Tellechea, E. (2011, November 10). En el ojo ajeno: Marcas
tipo
Atltico
de
Madrid.
Yorokobu.
Retrieved
from
http://www.yorokobu.es/en-el-ojo-ajenomarcas-tipo-atletico-demadrid/.
The Branding of Club Atltico de Madrid: Local or Global?
23
24
72.
73.
74.
75.
messi-inspires-a-new-generationof-worldclass-players-a-520733.html.
Schaerlaeckens, L. (2010, September 22).
Rolling out of control. ESPN.com.
Retrievedfromhttp://espn.go.com/sports/soccer/ne
ws/_/id/5580467/europeanfootball-eatingitself.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Callejo, M. B., and Forcadell, F. J. (2006).
Real Madrid Football Club: A New Model of
Business Organization for Sports Clubs in
Spain. Global Business and Organizational
Excellence, November/December: p. 1.
81. Economist. (2004, July 1). fte soccer business: fte Real deal. Economist, p. 62. 82.
Holmes, S. (2006).
83. Ibid.
84. Holmes, S. (2006).
85. Callejo and Forcadell. (2006). p. 59.
86. realmadrid.com.
(2008).
Retrieved
from
http://www.realmadrid.com/articulo/ rma42359.htm.
87. Peoples Daily. (2003, August 15). What Did the Real Madrid
Leave behind for Asia? Peoples Daily. Retrieved from
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/
doc/200308/15/content_255106.htm.
88. UNHCR. (2007, June 27). Real Madrid trains refugee children
in Panama City suburb. United Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees.
Retrieved
from
http://www.unhcr.org/468255d14.html.
89. Carvajal, D. (2005).
90. New York Times, fte. (2007, July 21). fte Real Story: Madrid
to Salt Lake City. fte New York Times Soccer Blog. Retrieved from
http://goal.blogs.nytimes.
com/2007/07/21/the-real-storymadrid-to-salt-lake-city/.
91. Carvajal, D. (2005).
92. Lowe, Sid. (2006, March 30). Figo slams galactico circus at Real
Madrid.
The
Telegraph.
Retrieved
from
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/2334522/
Figo-slamsgalactico-circus-at-Real-Madrid.html.
93. Carvajal, D.
(2005). 94.
Holmes, S.
(2006).
95. Manutd.com. Retrieved from http://www.manutd.com/en/History.aspx.
96. Ewing et al. (2004).
97. Forbes. (2005, April 1). fte Richest Soccer Teams. Forbes.
Retrieved
from
http://www.forbes.com/2005/04/01/cx_0401soccerintro.html
.
98. Hill, J. S. and Vincent, J. (2006).
99. MYcustomer. (2005, August 18). Customer Management In
Action:
Manchester
United.
Retrieved
from
http://www.mycustomer.com/topic/
customerintelligence/customer-management-action-manchester-united.
100. BBC. (2006, April 6). Man Utd sign 56m AIG shirt deal.
Retrieved
from
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4882640.stm.
101. Hill, J. S. and Vincent, J. (2006).
102. Ibid.
103. Independent. (2007, May 7). Marketing magician propels the Man
U brand into top division. Independent.ie. Retrieved from
http://www.independent.ie/ business/irish/marketing-magician-propelsthe-man-u-brand-into-top-division- 26302417.html.
104. Ibid.
105. manutd.com
106. Ewing et al. (2004).
26
http://worldsoccertalk.com/2009/10/26/
arsene-wengersmoneyball-strategy/.
126. Owen, D. (2007, October 20). Move over, Barcelona Formed
150 years ago, non-league and amateur Sheffield FC is proud to
call itself the worlds first foot- ball club. Financial Times, p. 1.
127. Bodet, G. and Chanavat, N. (2010). Building global football brand equity lessons from
the Chinese market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 22(1): 5566.
128. Vpel, H. and Steinhardt, M. (2008). Wirtschaftsfaktor fuball. Retrieved from
http://www.hwwi.org/fileadmin/hwwi/Publikationen/Partnerpublikationen/
HSH/Fussballstudie_14_B.pdf.
129. Ibid.
130. FIFA. (2007, July). Big count. FIFA Magazine, 1015.
131. Sharratt, J. (2011, March 11). Female Players; fte struggle to find an audience and
investment for a sporting elite. Five in Midfield. Retrieved from http://
fiveinmidfield.com/2011/03/11/female-players-the-struggle-to-find-an-audience-andinvestment-for-a-sporting-elite/.
132. Ibid.
133. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2008). Global Entertainment and Media Outlook: 2008
2012. New York, NY: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, p. 10.
134. International Public Relations Association. (2007, October 6). Adding Value ftrough
Sponsorship.
Retrieved
from
http://www.ipra.org/pdf/adding_value_
through_sponsorship.pdf.
135. Ewing et al. (2004).
136. Asian Football Business Review. (2006, March 10). Insight into European foot- ball
consumer
trends.
Retrieved
from
http://footballdynamicsasia.blogspot.
com/2006/03/insight-into-european-football.html.
137. Ewing et al. (2004). Holmes, S. (2006).
138. Economist. (2002, May 30). For love or money. Economist
Special
Edition.
Retrieved
from
http://www.economist.com/node/1142895, p. 57.
139. Piercy, J. (2014, October 13). Business of Sport: Real Madrids
mission to take over the Gulf. Sport360.com. Retrieved from
http://sport360.com/article/ business-sport/27382/business-sport-realmadrids-mission-take-over-gulf.
140. Ajax
Cape
Town.
(2014).
History.
Retrieved
from
http://www.ajaxct.co.za/the- club/history/. Peoples Daily Online.
(2005, December 13). Sheffield United takes over Chinese soccer
club.
Retrieved
from
http://en.people.cn/200512/13/
eng20051213_227501.html.
141. Marber, A., Wellen, P., and Posluszny, S. (2005). fte Merging of
Marketing and Sports: A Case Study. Marketing Management
Journal, Spring: p. 166.
142. Flynn, B. (2009). fte Garrison Game. In Barry Flynn (ed.)
Political Football. Dublin, Ireland: fte History Press Ireland.
143. Jorgensen, M. B. (2008). Transnationalising Civil Society?
fteoretical and empirical reflections on how to transnationalise
citizenship. Centre on Migra- tion, Policy and Society. Working
Paper No. 62, University of Oxford, pp. 910.
144. Borthayre, B. (2006, May 30). World Cup Soccer and the
Hispanic
Market.
Retrieved
from
http://www.marketingprofs.com/6/borthayre2.asp.
145. Ibid.
28
167. Gay de Libana, J. M., Carvalheira, F., and Oliveira, R. (2008). Ftbol & finanzas: La
economa de la Liga de las Estrellas 2007/08. Presentacin del Anlisis Contable de los
Estados Financieros de la temporada 2007/08. Primera Divisin Liga Espaola. Retrieved
from http://biblioteca.figc.it/4942/.
168. Mora y Araujo, M. (2008, March 21). Reborn Atletico blossom after dark days of Gil.
Financial Times.
169. Knowledge@Wharton. (2007, May 30). How to succeed in the market for signing up
soccer players. Retrieved from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn. edu/article/how-to-succeedin-the-market-for-signing-up-soccer-players/.
170. Maio, S. (2008). fte evolution of business soccer. Retrieved from
http://www.insidefutbol.com/2008/11/01/capital-powers-evolution-ofbusinesssoccer-part-1/.
171. fte Independent. (2009, June 16). Torres blasts Spanish clubs over foreign imports.
The Independent.
172. DW Staff. (2008, July 28). Klinsmann: Lack of cash no excuse for failure in
European soccer. Deutsche Welle.
173. Malek, C. (2009, June 23). Spanish inquisition: Are Atletico ready to break
tradition?
goal.com.
Retrieved
from
http://www.goal.com/en/news/12/
spain/2009/06/23/1341699/spanish-inquisition-are-atletico-madrid-ready-to- break.
174. Talbot, S. (2006).
30
glossary
Copa del Reyfte Kings Cup was an annual football cup
competition hosted by La Liga for Spanish teams. It was founded in
1902 and hosted eighty-three teams each year. FC Barcelona had won
the championship the most times. Entry was limited, with only the
Primera Divisin and twenty-three teams from the Segunda and Tercera
Divisins invited.
GalcticosA Spanish term used to describe expensive, world-famous
football play- ers. fte term was created under Florentino Prezs
presidency of team Real Madrid. Since its inception, the term galcticos
had come to refer to both the transfer policy for players and the players
themselves.
Kitfte standard equipment and attire worn by players. fte kit was
different from the uniform because the uniform consisted of only the
shirt, shorts and socks although the terms were often used
interchangeably. Kits were typically sponsored by a company and would
display the logo of the sponsor.
La Ligafte Liga Nacional de Ftbol Profesional was the top
professional football association of the Spanish football league system.
La Liga was also considered one of the most popular professional sports
leagues worldwide. ftere were three divisions in La Liga based on team
rankings and performance.
Primera DivisinAlso known as La Liga, the Primera Divisin held
the top twenty teams in the Spanish football league system. fte teams
Real Madrid and Barcelona had dominated the league since the 1950s,
although fifty-nine teams had competed in the league in total. fte
lowest three teams at the end of each season were dropped to the
Segunda Divisin.
Relegation (and Promotion)A process that took place at the
end of the football season in which the top teams in a division moved
up (promotion) to the next higher division, in replacement for the
bottom teams from that same division that moved down (relegation) to
take the place of those teams in the lower division. Depending on the
country, this process might continue down through many levels, such as
between 2 and 3, 3 and 4, and so on.
Transfer SystemA restriction on the freedom of professional football
players to transfer between clubs. It was created to prevent richer clubs
from luring players away from smaller clubs, but was deemed an
unjustifiable restraint of trade in 1981 for Spanish clubs, allowing
players to move freely.
Segunda Divisinfte middle division for Spanish teams in the La
Liga association. Also known as Liga Adelante, it hosted twenty-two
teams each season, the top three teams of which were eligible to be
promoted to the Primera Divisin at the end of the season.
Sociedades Anonimas Deportivas (SADs)fte public limited sports
company (SAD) status was adopted in 1990 to improve financial
management and transparency in sports clubs. Teams with SAD
designation often added the suffix to their name as with Club Atltico
de Madrid, SAD. Several teams such as Real Madrid retained their noncommercial sports designations for historical reasons.
a nd
Competitions
Spanish Leagues
Like other countries in Europe, Spanish football clubs were divided
into several national leagues. All the members of each league played
each other twiceonce at home and once away during the regular season.
Standings were determined by points, with teams receiving three points
for a win and one point for a draw (or tie). fte champion of each
national league was determined by the best overall record (great- est
number of points) at the end of the regular season, as there was no
championship game. Promotion and Relegation existed because there
were no league franchises as there were in U.S. sports leagues.
Instead, there were football clubs who competed in their league for
the respective season. At the end of each year, teams were promoted
and relegated between divisions for the next season. Generally, the
number of teams exchanged between each pair of leagues was
identical. In addition, the top four per- forming clubs in La Liga in Spain
qualified for European-wide competitions.
Supercopa de Espaa
A two-game championship contested by the winners of the La Liga and
the Copa del Rey.
European-wide Competitions
UEFA Champions League
fte UEFA Champions League was the most prestigious competition in
Europe. Win- ners of national leagues (and one or more runners-up from
some countries) qualified for the UEFA Champions League the next
season. fte Champions League involved four stages: a qualification
tournament, a first phase regular season (thirty-two clubs), a second phase
regular season (sixteen clubs), and then an eight-team single-elimination
32
UEFA Cup
fte UEFA Cup was the second-most prestigious competition in
Europe. Runners- up from national leagues qualified for the UEFA Cup
competition. fte competition began with single-elimination matches
until only forty teams remained. Teams then entered five-team groups
for round-robin play. Top group teams then competed in two-legged
knockout matches leading to a single-game championship game.
For those clubs that made it to the UEFA Cup in 2006/2007, each club received
70,000 for each round played, from the first qualifying round to the
first round. Teams that played in the group stage received a fixed
sum of 70,000. Winning in the group stage was worth 40,000 and
a draw was worth 20,000. Teams that went through to the
knockout stages received 70,000 for the round of thirty-two and
the same amount for the round of sixteen. UEFA Cup quarter-finalists
received
300,000 each, while the semi-finalists received 600,000 each. fte
winner of the final received 2.5 million and the runner-up received
1.5 million. Similar to the Champions League, quarter-finalists also
earned a sum in accordance with the value of their national market.
European System
Source: Adapted from Galvin, T.P. How to follow soccer in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.tompgalvin.com/features/soccer1.htm.
34
for tHe
Extraordinary Income
Income from Player SalesRevenues from transfer fees in selling
players. Clubs hoped to increase the value of their players over time as
they developed in skill, to sell for more than their amortized value.
Expenses
StafWage expenses, including any bonuses granted from winning
competitions. Player salaries had been trending upward due to teams
competing to recruit top talent.
Player AmortizationCosts incurred on buying new players. Due to the
high trans- fer fees incurred in acquiring new players, football teams
frequently listed players as intangible assets on team balance sheets.
ftese assets could be depreciated over the life of the contract, as a
players value was believed to be at zero on the end of contract as they
might leave for no penalty.
Other Operating ExpensesMarketing and miscellaneous costs
associated with com- mercial activities (related to the delivery on media
and commercial sponsorship contracts), exhibition tours, match
operations (catering and security), professional fees, etc. Specific
marketing expenses include: advertising, costs to agents for identifying sponsors, market research, production costs for sponsorship
items, and public relations.
intangible asset and amortized it over the length of the player contract.
ftis category usually included signing bonuses and player renewals as well.
Tangible AssetsMade up mainly of stadiums, other sports facilities,
museums, halls, shops with items for sale, television rights and collection
agencies, interest income, and interest received in advance of sponsorship
contracts.
Current Assets
InventoryIdle stock of physical goods that contain economic value and
held in vari- ous forms by a club.
Accounts ReceivableMoney owed by clients/customers to the club;
essentially cash not yet received. Includes player loans to other clubs.
Other Liquid AssetsMiscellaneous liquid assets.
CashCash on hand and in checking and savings accounts.
Liabilities
Shareholder EquityIncludes subscribed capital, paid-in capital, reserves,
and net income for the fiscal year.
Long-Term DebtIncludes debt to long-term creditors, deferred taxes, and
other mis- cellaneous long-term debt.
Short-Term DebtIncludes unpaid wages, accounts payable, and other
miscellaneous short-term debt.
36
Kia/Nike
Manchester United
Real Madrid
Arsenal
AIG/Nike
bwin/Adidas
Emirates/Nike
Other Sponsors
CocaThis
document
is
autho
d for use
only
Utomo
Sarjono
Putro in
2016.
30
13
: Local
Balance Sheet Figures ( million)
or
Global?FIXED ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
CASH
TOTAL ASSETS
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
LONG-TERM DEBT
RESERVES
SHORT-TERM DEBT
TOTAL LIABILITIES + EQUITY
74.6
24.0
28.5
22.1
121.0
5.3
65.9
14.5
35.4
46.5
0.283
324.8
128.2
115.7
80.9
242.8
68.6
152.9
11.0
89.4
82.0
26.3
365.
8
101.
0
135.
8
129.
0
282.
8
15.6
167.
1
3.7
82.1
83.0
51.0
264.4
119.5
88.8
56.1
207.4
19.0
128.0
58.9
42.1
57.0
32.5
453.5
80.9
3.2
537.6
23.3
282.1
52.2
229.0
586.6
978.9
345.9
62.8
1,387.
7
545.9
656.6
93.6
91.6
1,387.
7
530.
5
207.
8
0.8
739.
2
141.
1
231.
5
35.3
331.
3
739.
2
638.7
297.4
117.8
1,053.
9
167.2
391.8
33.7
430.7
1,023.
5
21.9
0.35
6.9
0.11
1.4
3.46
2.3
0.06
3.7
0.68
1.4
0.30
4.2
0.98
3.0
0.23
Financial Ratios
Debt/Equity
Current Ratio
Debt/Revenue
ROI
3
7
Sources: Compiled from various sources, including: Football Money League by Deloitte Sports Business Group (2009,2008); Club Atltico de Madrid (2009); Saludas, J.M.G. (2009)
F
or
th
e
e
x
cl
u
si
v
e
u
s
e
of
U.
P
ut