British US Corp PDF

The911StockPlay : Message: Re: [apfn-1] QUEEN ELIZABETH IS THE PRINCIPLE OVER THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST
05/31/2007 12:34 AM
Search:
Yahoo! My Yahoo! Mail
Web Search
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Finance - Groups - Help
The911StockPlay THE $50 TRILLION MARKET DAY -- 9/11

Home
Messages
Members Only
Post
Files
Messages
Message #
Messages Help
Go
Search:
Search
Advanced
Re: [apfn-1] QUEEN ELIZABETH IS THE PRINCIPLE

OVER THE SOCIAL SECURI
Reply | Forward
Message
List
Message #203 of 207 < Prev | Next >
Photos
Links
Database
Polls
Calendar
Salam A Lakum, Mohamed!

a thousand blessings!!
wonderful video from Jordan Maxwell!!!
Promote
Millennium Twain
Already a
member? Sign in to
Yahoo!
Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share
photos of your
group with the
world? Add a group
photo to Flickr.
Yahoo! 360
Share your life
through photos,
blogs, more.
--- mohamed gowid <mo03gowid@...> wrote:
Tue May 29, 2007 10:29 pm

Show Message Option
Summer Twain
<yonibluestar@...>
yonibluestar
Offline
Send Email
http://video.google.com/videoplay?
docid=1866496783791986992&q=Jordan+Maxwell
Bob Taft <rbtaft@wyoming. com> wrote:
Great article on our servitude below, excellent..
This subject
has been circulated before but not in as much
detail. Those who
still think that the Founding Scoundrels did us a
favor in 1787
should dwell on this. I had been uncertain as to
the date when the
King ceded all his lands to the Pope, and the
Pope handed them back
as a fiefdom: 1213. In 1215 King John signed the
Runnymede document
assigning a measure of sovereignty back to the
lesser Lords, who
obviously weren't too pleased about being shut out
of the loop.
When the Bastard King brought Roman rule to the
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/The911StockPlay/message/203
Page 1 of 15
05/31/2007 12:34 AM
Isles in 1066 it was

the beginning of the end of local sovereignty under
Exodus 18:21
though Hundreds courts still existed to some
extent in John's time.
Regarding the subservience of "the Jews" to the
Pope and the
Crown, things are not that clear-cut. The
Babylonian Talmud and the
Babylonian debt money system made their way to
Khazaria in the 8th
century. Three centuries later Khazaria was
conquered by the Turks,
the moneyed Khazars moving to the more
temperate area of Italy, while
its lower classes were absorbed by Poland. In
King John's time,
Christendom had not yet adopted the Jewish debtmoney scam. It made
its way north from Venice via the Khazars, as well
as north from
Spain and Portugal via the Sephardim who were
escaping the anti-usury
Inquisition. To say that the Pope owns the Jews, is
like saying that
today the corporations own US governments,
when in fact the line
distinguishing the two is fast disappearing. The
majority of stock
in the Fortune 500 companies now is in
government portfolios. So
saying that the Fascist corporations control the
collectivist
government is now a two-directional flow. Each
does in fact control
the other today, just as the anti-usury Church
controlled and was
controlled by the Jews back in 1215. All our
world's evils are
dependent on the debt-money scam, and the use
of commodities as money
is part of that scam.
Regarding the creditor status of Britain in claiming
the American
war debt to France, that was presumptuous of the
British Crown, but
then the Bourbons were subversively unseated in
France before the end
of the 18th century, so that settled that! One must
wonder that
while the Bourbons, the Romanovs, the
Hohenzollerns, the Habsburgs
and others have left history's pages, how come
Page 2 of 15
05/31/2007 12:34 AM
the Guelph-HanoverWindson crowd is still around?

Anyone who still clings to the fiction that our 1787
Constitution
was instituted to guarantee "freedom" to the
people is badly in need
of self-education.
Best regards,
Bob Taft
The Taft Ranch
Lander, Wyoming'
307-332-2352
http://www.rumormil lnews.com/ cgi-bin/archive.
cgi?read= 74897
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint
the great ones to public office." Aesop
----- Original Message ----From: Minnesota Republic
To: observer@coldreams. com
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 10:08 PM
Subject: Queen Elizabeth is the Principle over the
Social
Security Trust
Note: forwarded message attached.
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 16:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
Queen Elizabeth is the Principle over the Social
Security Trust
QUEEN ELIZABETH IS THE PRINCIPLE
OVER THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST
Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S.
Social Security, as
follows:
S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United
States of America)
Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into
force 1st September
1997 . At the Court at Buckingham Palace the
22nd day of July 1997.
Now, therefore Her Majesty in pursuance of
section 179 (1) (a) and
(2) of the Social Security Administration Act of
1992 and all other
powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by
and with advise of
Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby
ordered as follows:
Page 3 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
"This Order may be cited as the Social Security

(United States of
America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on
1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge
William Wayne
Justice stating in court that he takes his orders
from England ?
This order goes on to redefine words in the Social
Security Act and
makes some changes in United States Law.
Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer
and Prince Elector
of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the
United States of America."
See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at
Large. Great
Britain which is the agent for the Pope is in charge
of the USA
'plantation. '
What people do not know is that the so called
Founding Fathers
and King George were working hand-n-hand to
bring the people of
America to there knees, to install a Central
Government over them and
to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First
off you have to
understand that the UNITED STATES is a
corporation and that it
existed before the Revolutionary war. See
Respublica v. Sweers 1
Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)
Now, you also have to realize that King George
was not just the
King of England; he was also the King of France.
Treaty of Peace *
U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.
On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract
for the
repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES
had already received
dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782 .
Now the UNITED
STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due
January 1, 1788 from
King George via France. Is this not incredible the
King funded both
sides of the War. But there was more work that
needed to be done.
Page 4 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
Now the Articles of Confederation which was

declared in force March
1, 1781 States in Article 12 "All bills of credit
emitted, monies
borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the
authority of
Congress, before the assembling of the United
States, in pursuance of
the present confederation, shall be deemed and
considered a charge
against the United States, for payment and
satisfaction whereof the
said United States, and the public faith are hereby
solemnly
pledged."
Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even
though the War was
nothing more than a move to turn the people into
debtors for the
King, they were not done yet.
Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting
was convened in
Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic
instability of the
country under the Articles of Confederation. Only
five States come
to the meeting, but there is a call for another
meeting to take place
in Philadelphia the following year with the express
purpose of
revising the Articles of Confederation.
On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of
the meeting to
take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to
revise the Articles of
confederation. Something had to be done about
the mounting debt.
Little did the people know that the so called
founding fathers were
acutely going to reorganize the United States
because it was
Bankrupt.
On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates
approve the
Constitution. The States have now become
Constitutors. Constitutor:
In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement,
becomes responsible
for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law
Dictionary 6th Ed.
The States were now liable for the debt owed to
Page 5 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
the King, but the

people of America were not because they were
not a party to the
Constitution because it was never put to them for
a vote On August
4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An
Act making provision
for the payment of the Debt of the United States.
This can be found
at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This
Act for all intents
and purposes abolished the States and Created
the Districts. If you
don't believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal
Districts , here
in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each
District was assigned a
portion of the debt. The next step was for the
states to reorganize
their governments which most did in 1790. This
had to be done
because the States needed to legally bind the
people to the debt.
The original State Constitutions were never
submitted to the people
for a vote. So the governments wrote new
constitutions and submitted
them to people for a vote thereby binding the
people to the debts
owed to Great Britain . The people became
citizens of the State
where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the
United States. A
citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is
synonymous with
subject.
What you think is a state is in reality a corporation,
in other
words, a Person.
"Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F.
Supp 272
Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty
Gen 176.
There are no states, just corporations. Every body
politic on
this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an
artificial entity,
a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They
are images in
your mind that speak to you. We labor, pledge our
property and give
our children to a fiction.
Page 6 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
Now before we go any further let us examine a

few things in the
Constitution.
Article six section one keeps the loans from the
King valid it
states; All Debts contracted and Engagements
entered into, before the
Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid
against the United
States under this Constitution, as under the
Confederation.
Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article
One Section
Eight clause Two which states that Congress has
the power to borrow
money on the credit of the United States . This
was needed so the
United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on
January 1, 1788) could
borrow money and then because
the States were a party to the Constitution they
would also be
liable for it.
The next underhanded move was the creation of
The United States
Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which
there were 25,000
shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those
in England . The
Bank loaned the United States money in
exchange for Securities of the
United States .
Now the creditors of the United States which
included the King
wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were
given to the United
States . So Alexander Hamilton came up with the
great idea of taxing
alcohol. The people resisted so George
Washington sent out the
militia to collect the tax which they did. This has
become known as
the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to
collect taxes.
How did the United States collect taxes off of the
people if the
people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell
you how. The
people are slaves! The United States belongs to
the floundering
Page 7 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
fathers and their posterity and Great Britain.

America is nothing
more than a Plantation. It always has been. How
many times have you
seen someone in court attempt to use the
Constitution and then the
Judge tells him he can�t? It is because
you are not a party
to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!! ! If you don't believe
read Paddleboard,
Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City
of Savannah . 14
Georgia 438, 520 which states "But, indeed, no
private person has a
right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of
a breach of the
Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a
compact but he is
not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One
Section Eight
clause (15) which states that it is the militia's job to
execute the
laws of the Union . Now read Clause (16) Which
states that Congress
has the power to provide for organizing, arming,
and disciplining the
Militia, and for governing such part of them as may
be employed in
the service of the United States.... the Militia is not
there to
protect you and me, it is their to collect our
substance.
As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is
set up a
Military Government to guard the King's commerce
and make us slaves.
If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132
you will find
"The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and
Navigation.� This Treaty
was signed on November 19th, 1794 which was
twelve years after the
War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's
Troops were still
occupying the United States . Being the nice King
that he was, he
decided that the troops would return to England by
June 1st, 1796.
The troops were still on American soil because;
quite frankly the
King wanted them here.
Page 8 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
Here is the key to where this started:

Many people tend to blame the Jews for our
problems. Jewish Law
governs the entire world, as found in Jewish Law
by MENACHEM ELON,
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF
ISRAEL, to wit:
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding
on all Israel.
Every town and country must follow all customs,
give effect to the
decrees, and carry out the enactments of the
Talmudic sages, because
the entire Jewish people accepted everything
contained in Talmud.
The sages, who adopted the enactments and
decrees, instituted the
practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the
laws, constituted
all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who
received the
tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in
unbroken
succession going back to Moses, our teacher."
We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon.
As written in
the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil
law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English
Law" -- A Law of
the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in
"The George Town Law
Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly
stated in the Law
Review that the Jews are the property of the
Norman and Anglo-Saxon
Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law
of the land. It
explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the
law of the land, which
is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code.
The written credit
agreement -- the Jewish Shetar is a lien on all
property (realty) and
today it's called the mortgage! The treatise also
explains that the
Jews are owned by Great Britain and the Jews are
in charge of the
Banking system.
Page 9 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
We are living under the Babylonian Talmud; it is

where all of our
problems come from. It was brought into England
in 1066 and has been
enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian
churches ever since.
It is total and relentless mind control, people are
taught to believe
in things that do not exist.
Now before you scream that the UCC is
unconstitutional I'm sorry
people, you are not a party to any constitution.
Read the case cite
below.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to
complain, by suit
in court, on the ground of a breach of the
Constitution. The
Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a
party to it."
Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of
the City of Savannah
14 Ga. 438, 520
You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article
six Section
one) the United States and the States are the
parties to the
Constitution not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy
an automobile
from a man and that automobile has a warranty
and the engine blows up
the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just
forget about it.
Then you come along and tell the man to pay me
and he says no. So
you take him to court for not holding up the
contract. The court
then says case dismissed. Why? Because you are
not a party to the
contract. You cannot sue a government official for
not adhering to a
contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too.
You better
accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try
to use the
Constitution you are committing a CRIME known
as CRIMINAL TRESPASS.
Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a
private contract
that you are not a party to. Then to make matters
worse you are a
debt slave who owns no property or has any
Page 10 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
rights. You are a mere

user of your Masters property! Here are just a
couple of examples:
"The primary control and custody of infant is with
the
government." Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
" Marriage is a civil contract to which there are
three
parties-the husband, the wife and the state." Van
Koten v. Van
Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the
State:
individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of
Government,
i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be
in accordance with
law and subordinate to the necessities of the
State. Senate Document
No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v.
Welch supra) You own no
Property because you are a slave. Really you are
worse off than a
slave because you are also a debtor.
"The right of traffic or the transmission of property,
as an
absolute inalienable right, is one which has never
existed since
governments were instituted, and never can exist
under government."
Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481
Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the
American
people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United
States Government.
All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which
is in code. By
using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400
pages, there is a
blocking series which shows the taxpayer the type
of tax that is
being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399
blocking series,
which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to
BMF 300-399 which is
the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991,
this was U.S.-U.K.
Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a
business and involved
Page 11 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a

treaty between the
U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form
that is supposed to
be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign
Investment Real
Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law
Enforcement Manual
of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper- Office of
Management and
Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of
Active Information
collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction
Act is where form
8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902,
which says U.S. with
holding tax return for dispositions by foreign
persons, of U.S. Form
#8288, #8288a.
These codes have since been changed to read as
follows: IMF
300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated
valid for MFT-30, which
is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads
the same as IMF
300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax
Treaty Claims. Isn't it
INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a
tax to the U.K.
Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the
law that makes one
liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in
there because
it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a
private contract
called the Constitution of the United States Article
Six, Section One
and various agreements. Is a cow paying an
income tax when the
machine gets connected to its udders? The
answer is no. I have
never known a cow that owns property or has
been compensated for its
labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever
produced. You don't
even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is
measured in current
credit money. You are allowed to retain a small
portion of your
labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter
and most of all
breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many
of the other slaves
get upset if you try to retain your labor. You are
Page 12 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
called an
extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a
freeman. They say that you
are anti-government. When the truth of the matter
is you just don't
want to be a slave. But, you do not have the right
to force others
to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely
up to them.
If they want bow down and worship corporations,
let them. The United
States , Great Britain and the Pope are not the
problem, it is the
other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-beslaves were gone.
The United States , Great Britain and the Pope
would not even exist,
because no one would acknowledge them. I for a
matter of fact, think
that those who are in power are also tired of the
slaves. All the
slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free
healthcare, free
education, free housing and they beg those who
are in power to disarm
them I do agree that a slave should not have
access to a firearm.
How can you disagree with the government
passing out birth control?
I hope the breeding of slaves stops or at the very
least slows down.
You see we are cows, the IRS is the company
who milks the cows
and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who
takes care of the
herd, and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in
fee simple. The
farm is held in allodium by the Pope.
Now to Rome.
"Convinced that the principles of religion contribute
most
powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive
obedience which
they owe to their princes, the high contracting
parties declare it to
be their intention to sustain in their respective
states, those
measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim
of ameliorating
their interests, so intimately connected with the
preservation of the
authority of the princes; and the contracting
powers join in offering
Page 13 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
their thanks to the Pope for what he has already

done for them, and
solicit his constant cooperation in their views of
submitting the
nations." Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822).
If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist
on his law
being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV.,
De Syn. Dioec, lib,
ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws
moreover become
obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by
secular rulers.
Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus
nationale, (Federal Law)
or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in
the United States
may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign
Pontiff. Elements of
Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be
shown that the
Pope rules the world?
The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the
World. See
Treaty of 1213, Papal Bull of 1455 and 1492.
I could go on and on, this is just the tip of the
iceberg. Don't
let this information scare you because without it
you cannot be free.
You have to understand that all slavery and
freedom originates in
the mind. When your mind allows you to accept
and understand that
the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican
are corporations
which are nothing but fictional entities which have
been placed into
your mind, you will understand that your slavery
was because you
believed a lie.
For I: a man called Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath:
sovereign without
subjects: distinguished by my Great Seal: holding
the office of the
people: adhere to the Ten Commandments: with
full liability: in and
for the second judicial-district: Highlands: the
county; country of
Florida: under the authority of the one living deity:
King of kings,
Page 14 of 15
05/31/2007 12:35 AM
and Lord of lords: Yahweh:

Laszlo-Istvan: Horvath:
C/o Postal Department 652
Sebring, Florida [33871]
(863) 414-2752
Reply
Forward
Message #203 of 207 < Prev | Next >
Expand Messages
Author
Re: [apfn-1] QUEEN ELIZABETH IS THE

PRINCIPLE OVER THE SOCIAL SECURI
Salam A Lakum, Mohamed! a thousand blessings!!
wonderful video from Jordan Maxwell!!! Millennium
Twain ... ...
Sort by Date
Summer Twain May 30, 2007

yonibluestar
6:50 am
< Prev Topic | Next Topic >

Message #
Go
Search:
Search
Advanced
SPONSOR RESULTS
Online Currency Trading - Free Demo

www.gftforex.com - 24-Hour trading, award-winning software, charts and more
from GFT.
Barklay Equipment Lease and Finance

www.barklaycap.com - Upto $250k Application Only. Get A Quote In Seconds.
Earn From 4.91% to 5.43%

www.geinterestplus.com - With AAA rated, GE Capital Corp. Not an offer of
securities for sale.
Copyright 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Guidelines - Help
Page 15 of 15

British US Corp PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

British US Corp PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

British US Corp PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The911StockPlay : Message: Re: [apfn-1] QUEEN ELIZABETH IS THE PRINCIPLE OVER THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST

Yahoo! My Yahoo! Mail

Finance - Groups - Help

The911StockPlay THE $50 TRILLION MARKET DAY -- 9/11

Re: [apfn-1] QUEEN ELIZABETH IS THE PRINCIPLE

Message #203 of 207 < Prev | Next >

Salam A Lakum, Mohamed!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

--- mohamed gowid <mo03gowid@...> wrote:

Tue May 29, 2007 10:29 pm

Isles in 1066 it was

the Guelph-HanoverWindson crowd is still around?

"This Order may be cited as the Social Security

Now the Articles of Confederation which was

the King, but the

Now before we go any further let us examine a

fathers and their posterity and Great Britain.

Here is the key to where this started:

We are living under the Babylonian Talmud; it is

rights. You are a mere

in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a

their thanks to the Pope for what he has already

and Lord of lords: Yahweh:

Message #203 of 207 < Prev | Next >

Re: [apfn-1] QUEEN ELIZABETH IS THE

Summer Twain May 30, 2007

< Prev Topic | Next Topic >

Online Currency Trading - Free Demo

Barklay Equipment Lease and Finance

Earn From 4.91% to 5.43%

Copyright 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like