ajn@wolterskluwer.

com

Interprofessional
Education

Collaboration

and

Working together to ensure excellence in health care. T

he Future ing Institute Health, of Nursing: identifies of Medicine Leading interprofessional (IOM) Change, report, AdvanccollabThe
oration among health care providers as an essential part of improving the accessibility, quality, and value of health care in the
United States.1 The report high- lights four key messages, one of which emphasizes nurses role as full partners, with physicians
and other health professionals, in redesigning health care.1 Another underscores that nurses must be accountable for their own
contributions to delivering high-quality care while working collaboratively with leaders from other health professions.1 This
message emphasizes the importance of nurse leadership in ad- vancing interprofessional collaboration in all settings, including in
the boardrooms of organizations that have an impact on health and health care delivery.
The same year that the IOM report was published, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a blueprint for
implementing interprofessional educa- tion and collaborative practice to meet demand in the face of a global health care
workforce shortage.2 In the WHO framework, collaborative practice hap- pens when multiple health workers from different
professional backgrounds work together with pa- tients, families, carers and communities to deliver the highest quality of care.2
It makes sense that the best care would be delivered by a team of carers or providers with diverse experience, education, and
trainingall of whom exchange information with one another and are dedicated to patient health and well-being.
Interprofessional collaboration is based on the premise that when providers and patients communi- cate and consider each
others unique perspective, they can better address the multiple factors that influ- ence the health of individuals, families, and
communi- ties. No one provider can do all of this alone.
However, shifting the culture of health care away from the silo system, in which clinicians operate independently of one
another, and toward collabo- ration has been attempted before without enduring success. For nearly five decades a commitment to
interprofessional learning has waxed and waned in health professions training programs. During this time, health care leaders
have shown intermittent interest in interprofessional collaboration in the delivery of health care. Strong and convincing out- come
data demonstrating the value of team-based care have been lacking, but changes in our health care system now require that we
explore how we can make interprofessional collaboration the norm instead of the exception.
The Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action is a collaboration of the Robert Wood Johnson Founda- tion (RWJF) and AARP
that was established in late 2010 to implement the IOMs recommendations at the national and state levels. To date, 51 action
coali- tions and dozens of national organizations are com- mitted to carrying out this important work. In this article, we highlight
the imperative to shift profes- sional cultures toward collaboration, current state initiatives designed to foster interprofessional
collab- oration, opportunities and resources for incorporat- ing interdisciplinary efforts into daily practice, and the challenges that
remain.

ADVANCING HEALTH THROUGH NURSING PROGRESS OF THE

CAMPAIGN FOR ACTION
AJN
March 2015 Vol. 115, No. 3 47

By Mary Sullivan, PhD, RN, FAAN, Richard D. Kiovsky, MD, FAAFP, Diana J. Mason, PhD, RN, FAAN,
Cordelia D. Hill, LMSW, and Carissa Dukes, BGS

ADVANCING HEALTH THROUGH NURSING PROGRESS OF THE CAMPAIGN FOR

ACTION
INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION FOR COLLABORATIVE PRACTICE Interprofessional education (IPE) and
interprofes- sional collaborative practice (IPCP) are separate but related concepts. For health professionals, learning the skills to
effectively work on IPCP teams is best gained through IPE, in which students from two or more health professions study
together, so they can provide collaborative, safe, high-quality, accessible patient-centered care.3 Learners may not yet be licensed, or they may be practicing professionals. IPCP requires retraining of the current workforce, so that professionals can learn
new skills and new ways to relate to one another.
One of the intentions of IPE is that students from different health professions practice to the full extent of their education and
training and, in the process, explore the margins of their practices. At the same time, they learn how to have effective interprofessional relationships through collaborative sharing of skills and knowledge. Elements of collaborative prac- tice include
responsibility, accountability, coordina- tion, communication, cooperation, assertiveness, autonomy, mutual trust, and respect.
The RWJF defines effective collaborative practice as promoting4
the active participation of each discipline in patient care, where all disciplines are working together and fully engaging patients
and those who support them, and leadership on the team adapts based on patient needs. Effective inter- professional collaboration
enhances patient and family centered goals and values, provides mechanisms for continuous communication among caregivers,
and optimizes participation in clinical decision making within and across disciplines. It fosters respect for the disciplin- ary
contributions of all professionals.
THE IMPERATIVE TO SHIFT PROFESSIONAL CULTURES Several factors contribute to making IPCP a desir- able model of
care in the effort to improve health outcomes. These include current concerns about qual- ity and safety, the need for cost
containment, health care worker shortages, and the connection between IPE core competencies for team-based care and educational program accreditation.5
Quality and safety. The link between interpro- fessional collaboration and quality and safety has been highlighted in several
IOM reports (see The Institute of Medicines Reports6-8). These detail the poor quality of care and high rate of preventable
medical errors that occur when health professionals operate in silos.
Collaboration might simply mean handing the patient chart to the next provider. A lack of communication, however, can
jeopardize the deliv- ery of care and the safety of the patient. It can also lead to gaps in coverage or to an oversight by a
responsible professional and a loss of information. A silo men- tality eliminates the opportunity to build and learn from the
strengths of others. Changing this way of thinking is dependent on educating practicing health professionals as well as students.
In 2013, a conference sponsored by the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation brought together health educa- tors and practice leaders to
focus on aligning IPE and clinical practice redesign amid the changes brought about by health care reform. During the
conference, a vision emerged of a healthcare system in which learners and practitioners across the professions are working
collaboratively with patients, families and communities and with each other to accomplish the Triple Aim, which refers to
efforts to improve the patients experience, improve the health of popula- tions, and reduce health care costs.9 Participants also
developed these five recommendations9:
1. Engage patients, families, and communities in the design, implementation, im- provement, and evaluation of efforts to link interprofessional education and col- laborative
practice. 2. Accelerate the design, implementation, and evaluation of innovative models linking in- terprofessional education and
collabora- tive practice. 3. Reform the education and life-long career development of health professionals to in- corporate
interprofessional learning and team-based care. 4. Revise professional regulatory standards
and practices to permit and promote inno- vation in interprofessional education and collaborative practice. 5. Realign existing
resources to establish and sustain the linkage between interprofes- sional education and collaborative practice.
Shortage of health care workers. A projected short- age of health care providers will require clinicians to practice in smart and
efficient ways that rely on excel- lent interprofessional communication. The Association of American Medical Colleges estimates
a shortage of 45,000 primary care physicians and 46,000 surgeons and medical specialists by 2020, owing in part to the growing
population of older adults and to the millions of people who will be covered by health insurance as a result of the Affordable Care
Act.10
48 AJN

 March 2015 Vol. 115, No. 3 ajnonline.com

[email protected]
Some analysts say the shortages can be avoided through practicing new models of team-based care that rely on clinicians other
than physicianssuch as NPs and physician assistantsfor primary care. A RAND Corporation study found that this strategy
could reduce the physician shortage by more than half.11
The nursing profession faces its own workforce challenges in meeting the nations health care needs, particularly the needs of
the increasing number of older adults, who use more health care resources than younger populations. The RN workforce is
projected to grow from 2.71 million in 2012 to 3.24 million in 2022an increase of 19%.12 However, the increase in the number
of U.S. nurses has been buoyed by older nurses who delayed retirement during the recent reces- sion.13 As these nurses start to
retire, a nursing short- age may arise again.
Competencies. In February 2012, six national as- sociations of health professionals created the Interpro- fessional Education
Collaborative (IPEC) to advance team-based care and education. These organizations included the American Association of
Colleges of Nursing (AACN), the American Association of Col- leges of Osteopathic Medicine, the American Associ- ation of
Colleges of Pharmacy, the American Dental Education Association, the Association of American Medical Colleges, and the
Association of Schools of Public Health.3
The IPEC established core competencies, or prin- ciples, that serve as guidelines for faculty and ad- ministrators creating a
curriculum focusing on IPE. These competencies were subsequently endorsed by the Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), among other organizations. The competen- cies span four domains14:
values and ethics for interprofessional practice
roles and responsibilities
interprofessional communication
teams and teamwork Policies as well as curricular and accreditation changes have strengthened IPE in health professions
schools. The AACNs Essentials documents, which summarize the curriculum content and competencies for baccalaureate,
masters degree, and doctor of nurs- ing practice programs, require that these curricula integrate content and clinical opportunities
on inter- professional collaboration (go to www.aacn.nche.edu/ education-resources/essential-series for more). In 2008, the need
for IPE was identified as an action issue by the Association of American Medical Col- leges. Schools of dentistry, pharmacy,
public health, and osteopathy have individually set competency ex- pectations for their curricula. The result is an effort toward
achieving IPCP across health professions.14

The Institute of Medicines Reports Driving interprofessional collaboration.

In addition to The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health, the following Institute of Medicine reports
highlight problems in health care quality and safety and demand better interprofessional collaboration among health
care providers.
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System6 focuses on pre- ventable medical errors as a leading cause of
death in the United States, with many of these arising from poor interprofessional com- munication and collaboration.
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Cen- tury7 concentrates on assessing and
improving the nations quality of care, and addresses system flaws and the need for patient-centered care to improve
patient safety. The report notes a growing concern with the lack of clinical programs that have an interprofessional infrastructure and criticizes the health care system as overly complex, requiring steps and handoffs that slow down the
care process and decrease rather than improve safety.
Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality 8 notes that health professionals should be educated to deliver
patient-centered care as members of interdisciplinary teams. According to the report, this would streamline the way
professionals share and acquire informa- tion related to error prevention and quality improvement.
In 2012, the National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education (https://nexusipe.org) was launched by HRSA
through a five-year, $4 million15 cooperative agreement with the University of Minne- sota, which houses the center. Three
organizations the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, the RWJF, and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundationprovided more than
$8 million in additional funding.16 Con- tinuing funds depend on the centers ability to dem- onstrate the beneficial outcomes of
IPE and IPCP. According to the centers Web site, HRSA has des- ignated it as the sole center to provide leadership, scholarship,
evidence, coordination and national visi- bility to advance interprofessional education and practice as a viable and efficient health
care delivery model.16 The Web site includes community spaces for research exchange, popular forums open to the public, and

opportunities for networking with other professionals interested in advancing interprofessional collaboration.
Several exciting studies of models of collaborative care demonstrate early results that suggest improve- ments in health
outcomes and cost savings in both acute and ambulatory care. For example, as part of its Care Transformation initiative launched
in 2009, Emory Healthcare in Atlanta is studying the effective- ness of structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds
AJN
March 2015 Vol. 115, No. 3 49

ADVANCING HEALTH THROUGH NURSING PROGRESS OF THE CAMPAIGN FOR

ACTION
(SIBR) on a 24-bed accountable care unit.17, 18 SIBR focuses on improving interprofessional collaboration by using a nurse-led
model of collaborative cross- checking (about discharge plans, for example, or medication orders), nurse-led bedside shift reporting, and daily huddles with additional health care team members.18
Since the start of this study in 2010, Emory Health- care has noted a reduction in the number of hypogly- cemic episodes,
catheter-related bloodstream infections, hyperglycemic episodes, and deaths on the unit as well as in lengths of stay.17, 18
Positive outcomes were also seen in the relationship between nurses and physi- cians. Willingness to participate in collaborative
rounds is an example of how nurses and physicians are coming together to provide care. Conversations with unit staff indicated
that they felt they had an ef- fective working relationship.18 Notably, these improve- ments required little additional
expenditure.17, 18
INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION IN ACTION In 2013, an analysis of preventable medical errors in the United
States found that such errors result in 210,000 to more than 400,000 deaths each year19 making these errors the third leading
cause of death in Americans. More progress is needed to improve patient safety by breaking down professional silos. This makes
the work of the Campaign for Action all the more important. In a broad sense, interprofes- sional collaborationor engaging
diverse stakeholders in working toward a common goalhas been valued since the 2008 formation of the Committee on the
RWJF Initiative on the Future of Nursing, the com- mittee responsible for creating the Future of Nursing report. The 18 members
of this committee have di- verse backgrounds and brought their unique perspec- tives to the crafting of the report, which was not
the work of nurses alone, but rather included experts in the areas of federal and state administration and regulations, hospital and
health plan administration, business administration, health information and tech- nology, public health, health services research,
health policy, workforce research and policy, and economics.1 The professionals involved in the Campaign for Action were also
selected to reflect the interprofessional col- laboration the initiative espouses. This organizational structure was created to ensure
the sustainability of the campaigns work implementing the IOM reports rec- ommendations.
The members of the campaigns Strategic Advisory Committee shape the campaigns strategic vision and serve as its chief
ambassadors.20 This committee, as well as the Champion Nursing Coalitioncreated by the Center to Champion Nursing in
America (CCNA), a joint initiative of AARP and the RWJF established in
2007intentionally include diverse representatives, such as business leaders, physicians, health care pro- viders, and experts in
health care quality. The cam- paigns Champion Nursing Council, also created by the CCNA, consists of more than 50 national
nursing organizations that have publicly committed to the campaigns vision. The council and the coalition have been
instrumental in advancing the IOM recommen- dations on the state and national levels. (For more on the members of the
Champion Nursing Coali- tion, see http://campaignforaction.org/whos-involved/ champion-nursing-coalition. For more on the
Cham- pion Nursing Coalition and the Champion Nursing Council, see the first article in this series, A Bold New Vision for
Americas Health Care System, Feb- ruary.)
The campaigns state-level work is led by action co- alitions, which operate in 50 states and the District of Columbia. These
coalitions are encouraged to involve diverse partners who have an interest in transforming health care. Although leadership
structures vary by state, each action coalition is headed by two coleaders, one a representative of nursing and one a nurse champion (from a nonnursing organization). The nurse champions broaden the perspectives of the people working in the action
coalitions and facilitate connec- tions that promote sustainability through in-kind and monetary support.
This infrastructure demonstrates an appreciation that nurses cannot transform health care by them- selves. It also emphasizes
the importance of engag- ing everyone with a stake in health and health care in supporting implementation of the IOM recommendations (see the five campaign imperatives at http://campaignforaction.org/resource/campaign- imperatives).
ACTION COALITIONS Although nearly half of the Campaign for Actions 51 action coalitions report that one of their goals is
to de- velop or implement an interprofessional practice and education model in their state, 10 report that they are in the process of
developing or implementing such ef- forts, two have completed development or implemen- tation, and many are just getting
started. Here are a few highlights of the state coalitions work.
Utah. Coalition members helped to initiate an IPE program at the states flagship university, the Univer- sity of Utah. Unique
aspects of this program and keys to its success include
required curriculum components for all students in the University of Utah Health Sciences colleges.
engaged, active learning with plenty of dialogue and debriefing.

 positive student response.

50 AJN
March 2015 Vol. 115, No. 3 ajnonline.com

[email protected]
faculty champions from all of the health sciences colleges, who design and deliver the curriculum together.
the inclusion of both undergraduate and graduate nursing students in IPE. All health sciences students participate in at least one
IPE course during their program of study; some com- plete as many as five. These one-credit courses involve complex patient
care management scenarios incorpo- rating the use of simulation manikins or standardized patients.
The program is evaluated using student and facili- tator feedback. In surveys completed after each re- quired IPE course,
students respond to a standardized set of questions about interprofessional attitudes and can also add comments. Facilitators give
their feed- back following each simulation-based IPE course, which includes student preparation and readings; a simulated, teambased patient care management ex- perience; and facilitated debriefing sessions.
It was important to this programs success to ob- tain start-up funding and support from the health sciences leadership, invest
in a full-time IPE director for all health sciences students, and create a business plan to ensure sustainability by capturing
program participation fees from all of the schools. This pro- gram of IPE courses is for students in the schools of medicine,
nursing, pharmacy, dentistry, and al- lied health. It started with 278 students in the fall of 2012, expanded to 1,250 students by the
2013 2014 school year, and this school year increased to approximately 1,300 students, including those from the new dental
school.
Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Action Coalition has been working with the Wisconsin Council on Medi- cal Education and
Workforce to raise awareness and further the discussion about how cooperation and in- tegration among health professionals can
lead to con- tinuous improvements in patient care.
Through events like the one-day conference, Build- ing a Culture for Patient-Centered Team Based Care, health
professionals and students learn about the patient-centered work of health care teams from various health care organizations.
Attendees at this November 2014 conference learned how health care teams have implemented interprofessional collabora- tion
at their sites of care and heard examples of suc- cessful team initiatives throughout the state.
Colorado. The Colorado Center for Nursing Excel- lence is one of the Colorado Action Coalitions colead organizations. In
collaboration with the Metro Com- munity Provider Network and the Colorado Commu- nity Health Network, the center received
a grant from HRSA to support the implementation of IPCP teams across the state.
This program will run through June 2016 and fo- cuses on building teams in federally qualified health centers and safety net
clinics. Its three goals are to (1) create an institute to train emerging nurse leaders so they can learn interprofessional team
leadership skills, (2) engage nursing students, and (3) develop interpro- fessional teams. Participants are RNs and all members of
the integrated care team, including primary care providers; accountants; and human resources, behav- ioral health, and dentistry
personnel.
Measures of improved leadership and team effec- tiveness include increased patient satisfaction with the teams quality of care
as well as a reduction in indi- vidual team members desire to leave the team.
Rhode Island. The Rhode Island Collaborative for Interprofessional Education and Practice is funded by Partners Investing in
Nursings Future (www. partnersinnursing.org), a collaboration of the North- west Health Foundation and the RWJF, and has the
support of members of the Rhode Island Action Co- alition. The collaboratives focus is to develop and implement a statewide
IPE program of shared learn- ing, resources, curriculum, and evaluation methods. Its partners include the Rhode Island College
School of Nursing and School of Social Work, the University of Rhode Island College of Nursing (where coauthor Mary Sullivan
is a professor and interim dean) and College of Pharmacy, and the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.
Development of the shared curriculum involved all members of the partner education programs. The curriculum model
includes the four IPEC core com- petency domains.14 Existing practices were evaluated through surveying the partner school
members to learn which IPEC competencies and subcompeten- cies the faculty and students considered to be most important, as
well as to identify gaps in curricula.14
Three components of the shared learning curricu- lum were developed, implemented, and evaluated. The first is a workshop
consisting of a discussion of written case-based scenarios and a demonstration in which a standard patient (an actor playing the
role of a pa- tient) has an injury and is in the ED. The students must assess and manage the patients care. The second is a
workshop using a team-building exercise and a stan- dard patient case (again, an actor plays the role of the patient) that includes
an interview with the patient and an examination. The students participating in this ac- tivity were second-year medical, fourthyear nursing, and fifth-year pharmacy students. For the third activity, three interprofessional student teams (each typically made
up of a medical student, nursing student, and pharmacy student) worked together to conduct a his- tory and physical, interpret

laboratory and X-ray re- sults, discuss the diagnosis, and develop a plan of care.
AJN
March 2015 Vol. 115, No. 3 51

ADVANCING HEALTH THROUGH NURSING PROGRESS OF THE CAMPAIGN FOR

ACTION
Surveys conducted before and after implementation of the program assessed student attitudes toward in- terprofessional
practice. These showed that students knowledge of and attitudes toward IPE improved af- ter their involvement in the program:
74% said they would have a positive view of IPE in the future.21
With the support of Partners Investing in Nursings Future, the Rhode Island Regional Collaborative for Interprofessional
Education and Practice has developed a sustainability plan that includes a vision, a mission and values statement, a case
statement, ongoing work on branding and identification of stakeholders, and the creation of an IPE clinical coordinator position.
Indiana. The colead of the Indiana Action Coalition (coauthor Richard Kiovsky) represented the coali- tion in its successful
application for a federal grant funded by HRSA under its Nurse Education, Practice, Quality and Retention Programto
advance IPE and IPCP at Indiana University. The coalition used this grant to focus on three aims:
develop IPCP in the urban acute care setting, par- ticularly promoting IPCP core values and enhanc- ing the role of nurses on
the team
identify five rural ambulatory clinical sites in un- derserved communities and introduce IPCP with a focus on team building,
communication, and improving patient care outcomes (with an empha- sis on chronic disease care) while augmenting the role of
nurses on the team
identify one RN from each clinical site to partici- pate in a nurse leader training program at the In- diana University School of
Nursing The Indiana Action Coalition has co-led activities with the Indiana Area Health Education Centers to improve IPE and
IPCP. Activities have included a pre- conference meeting on IPE at the 2011 Indiana Ru- ral Health Association Annual
Conference to discuss what could be done within academic institutions to increase awareness of the importance of IPE and collaborative care.
There has also been the development of IPE criteria for interprofessional clinical sites via a statewide con- ference in 2013 for
nearly 100 health professionals across all disciplines. Conference goals included high- lighting the importance of linking IPE and
IPCP in health professions education, understanding the rele- vance of IPE, and identifying opportunities to use IPE to advance
the patient-centered medical homes model of care. One physician received feedback on an instru- ment he is developing to help
clinical sites determine their preparedness for IPE learning. This work aims to ensure that IPE is not just theoretical learning and
that students have opportunities to see IPCP in action.
Additionally, the Indiana Action Coalition IPE sub- committee has
developed IPE Snapshot, a document that lists IPE events and experiences taking place across the state.
hosted a statewide interprofessional student simulation event at which 25 students from four universities completed five
simulations in a labo- ratory. The data collected from the students and faculty participants supported the need for IPE and showed
that they considered it to be a posi- tive experience.
developed a user-to-user IPE database to enable those seeking IPE experiences to connect through the Internet. The database
collects information about the IPE experience, such as type of students involved, objectives of their experiences, learning strategy
used, and contact information of the IPE provider.
started to plan a statewide, online IPE event that will feature a 3-D virtual environment using ava- tars as patients and providers.
This virtual format will eliminate travel time and improve coordina- tion when offering IPE.
MOVING FORWARD: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES Although this work is exciting and promises to ad- vance
interprofessional teamworkand by doing so, to improve the quality and cost of caremany remaining challenges must be
addressed to sustain interprofessional collaboration and to make it a re- ality throughout both the health care system and educational institutions.
Models of IPCP are emerging all over the coun- try. A CFAR report funded by the RWJF describes promising practices for
advancing IPCP in a variety of contexts.4 Success in implementing these models in the long term will require a focus on
leadership and organizational buy-in.22 Effective collaborative care models also require defining the scope of prac- tice for all
health professions. A 2001 study by Way and colleagues showed that NPs are underutilized in the team setting, owing in part to a
lack of inter- disciplinary education.23 According to the Interpro- fessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, one of the
challenges to overcome is a lack of top admin- istrative leadership support for adequate resources to create an interprofessional
component to health pro- fessions students education.14

IPE remains one of the hurdles to embracing inter- professional collaboration in health care settings. The first step in fostering
IPE is exploring initiatives already under way.24 Barnsteiner and colleagues recommend connecting with workers in other health
professions to identify steps that can be taken by a group of com- mitted individuals. Despite knowing that interprofes- sional
collaboration can improve patient safety and
52 AJN
March 2015 Vol. 115, No. 3 ajnonline.com

[email protected]
clinical outcomes,24 few schools include the training in their curricula; it must become a core element of curricula in all health
professions schools.
Faculty development is a key element in the cre- ation of IPE. Simply bringing faculty from different health care disciplines
into the same classroom, labo- ratory, simulation center, patient care facility, or other learning environment will not automatically
result in a beneficial IPE experience. Its important to identify opportunities for interprofessional teamwork.25 De- partments and
colleges must also be committed to addressing calendar and scheduling differences, cur- ricular mapping (in which educators
create a record of what theyve taught so it can be reviewed and im- proved on), mentor and faculty training, a sense of
community, and adequate physical space.26
The IOM found several practices that prevent most health care organizations from being considered high- reliability
organizations, or those that maintain high levels of safety despite the dangers inherent in the busi- ness.27 Kurtzman and
Fauteux noted that these prac- tices include a lack of measurement and feedback to staff who participate in process
improvement; an in- consistent commitment by organizations to sustain change over time in the face of adversity; and a lack of
consistent involvement in process redesign by frontline staffincluding nurses.28
Although strides have been made in transforming care, most health care organizations do not have pro- grams in place that
transform nurses work environ- ments.28 Supporting nurse leadership is one area in which there is room for improvement. It is
important that nurse leaders realize that their influence on the quality of patient care is far-reaching. Encouraging nurses to serve
on governing boards of organizations that have an impact on health and health care is im- portant to overcoming gender bias and
underrepre- sentation.
Another hurdle in sustaining emerging models of collaborative care is funding. Many of the current programs are funded by
grants, but will they be sus- tainable once the grant money is exhausted? New models of reimbursement are on the horizon and
may offer a source of funding. A variety of reimbursement plans based on health outcomes have emerged in the last decade. They
include risk sharing, pay for per- formance, and coverage with evidence develop- ment, in which payment is made for some
services if data gathered during clinical care demonstrate the impact of these services on the health of Medicare beneficiaries.29
A CALL TO ACTION What can you do to advance health and health care through interprofessional collaboration?

Acknowledgments
The following action coalition leaders, members, supporters, and health care professionals, among others, have
contributed to the IPE and IPCP efforts ref- erenced in this article and/or have provided assistance in the articles
devel- opment: Judith M. Hansen, MS, BSN, RN, executive director, Wisconsin Center for Nurs- ing, colead,
Wisconsin Action Coalition Maureen R. Keefe, PhD, RN, FAAN, dean emeritus and professor, University of Utah
College of Nursing, Utah Action Coalition for Health Vivian Lee, MD, PhD, MBA, dean, University of Utah School of
Medicine, senior vice president, University Health Sciences, chief executive officer, University of Utah Health Care
Susan K. Moyer, MS, RN, CNSPH, assistant project director, Colorado Center for Nursing Excellence Brian Quilliam,
PhD, associate dean, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy Brian Sick, MD, team leader, Minnesota
Nexus, National Center for Interpro- fessional Practice and Education Tim Size, MBA, BSE executive director, Rural
Wisconsin Health Cooperative, colead, Wisconsin Action Coalition Maureen Sroczynski, DNP, RN, project director,
Partners Investing in Nursings Future Jane Williams, PhD, RN, dean, Rhode Island College School of Nursing
Rebecca Wilson, PhD, RN, CHSE, director of Interprofessional Education, Uni- versity of Utah College of Nursing
First, advocate for more IPE in health professions schools. Whether you are a practicing nurse, an ad- ministrator, an educator,
a health professions student, or just interested in improving the quality and value of health care, you can ask the educational
institutions in your area whether they support IPE and what their offerings include.
The Campaign for Action is doing just that on a national level. One of six measures of the campaigns progress toward
implementing the IOMs recommen- dations is whether there is an increase in the number of required clinical courses or activities
at top nursing schools that include both nursing students and other graduate health professional students (for more in- formation
about the campaigns dashboard indica- tors, see http://campaignforaction.org/dashboard). More than half the tracked schools
have increased the number of clinical courses or activities that in- clude both nursing and other graduate health pro- fessional
students.
Second, nurses and nurse champions can advocate for following a model of collaborative care where they work by sharing
their ideas and taking leader- ship roles. One way you can become full partners,

AJN
March 2015 Vol. 115, No. 3 53

ADVANCING HEALTH THROUGH NURSING PROGRESS OF THE CAMPAIGN FOR

ACTION
with physicians and other health professionals, in redesigning health care1 is to join a board or help someone else to join one.
Additional resources re- garding participation on boards can be found on the campaigns Web site (see
http://campaignforaction.org/ resource/leadership-action-meetings-materials).
Finally, advocate for the removal of barriers to practice and care by encouraging all team members to practice to the full extent
of their education. Connect with people who are passionate about implementing IPCP and IPE in your state, whether this is
through your states action coalition, nursing organizations, educational institutions, or online communities. For information
about how you can get involved in your states action coalition, visit http://campaignforaction. org/states. Also visit the Campaign
for Action Web site (www.campaignforaction.org) to join this national online community, see the progress being made, and
become a part of transforming health care through implementation of the IOMs recommendations.
Mary Sullivan is the interim dean and a professor at the Univer- sity of Rhode Island, Kingston. Richard D. Kiovsky is a
professor of clinical family medicine at the Indiana University School of Medicine and the executive director of the Indiana Area
Health Education Centers Network, Indianapolis. Diana J. Mason is the Rudin Professor of Nursing and codirector of the Center
for Health, Media and Policy at the School of Nursing, City Uni- versity of New York. Cordelia D. Hill is a project manager at
AARPs Center to Champion Nursing in America and the Future of Nursing: Campaign for Actions liaison between AARP and
the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ. Carissa Dukes is a research assistant at the Indiana University School of
Nursing in Indianapolis. Contact author: Cordelia D. Hill, chill@ aarp.org. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of
in- terest, financial or otherwise.
REFERENCES
1. Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine. The
future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Washing- ton, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. 2. Health Professions
Networks Nursing and Midwifery Office. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice.
Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2010. 3 . Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for
interprofessional collaborative practice: pre-publication rec- ommendations from the IPEC expert panel. Washington, DC; 2011
Feb. 4 . Tomasik J, Fleming C. Lessons from the field: promising in- terprofessional collaboration practices. Philadelphia: CFAR;
2015 Feb. p. 2-48. 5 . Weinstein RS, et al. Bridging the quality chasm: interprofessional teams to the rescue? Am J Med 2013;126(4):276-7. 6 . Kohn LT, et al., eds. To err is human: building a safer health system.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. 7 . Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new
health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Na- tional Academy Press; 2001. 8 . Greiner AC, et al., eds. Health
professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
9 . Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation. Conference recommendations.
Transforming patient care: aligning interprofessional education with clinical practice redesign. Atlanta; 2013 Jan 17-20. 1 0.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Physician shortages to worsen without increases in residency training. Washington,
DC; 2013 Jun 3. 1 1. Auerbach DI, et al. Nurse-managed health centers and patientcentered medical homes could mitigate expected primary care physician shortage. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(11): 1933-41.
1 2. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Economic news release. Table 8. Occupations with the largest projected number of job open- ings
due to growth and replacement needs, 2012 and projected 2022. Washington, DC 2013. 1 3. Auerbach DI, et al. Registered nurses
are delaying retirement,
a shift that has contributed to recent growth in the nurse workforce. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(8):1474-80. 1 4.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies
for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an ex- pert panel. Washington, DC; 2011 May. 1 5. Chen FM, et al. The case
for a National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education. J Interprof Care 2013;27(5): 356-7. 16. National Center for Interprofessional Practice and
Education.
About us. University of Minnesota. 2013. https://nexusipe.org/ about. 17. Stein J, et al. A remedy for fragmented hospital care
[blog post].

Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business ReviewHBR.org 2013. 18. Castle BW, et al. Indiana University health collaboration site
visit [PowerPoint presentation]. Atlanta: Emory Healthcare, Emory University Hospital; 2014 Apr. 19. James JT. A new,
evidence-based estimate of patient harms
associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf 2013;9(3):122-8. 20. Future of Nursing. Campaign for action: whos involved
strategic advisory committee. Center to Champion Nursing in America. n.d. http://campaignforaction.org/whos-involved/
strategic-advisory-committee. 21. MacDonnell CP, et al. An introductory interprofessional exercise for healthcare students. Am J Pharm Educ 2012;76(8):154. 22. Long T, et al. Moving from silos to teamwork: integration
of
interprofessional trainees into a medical home model. J In- terprof Care 2014;28(5):473-4. 23. Way D, et al. Primary health care
services provided by nurse practitioners and family physicians in shared practice. CMAJ 2001;165(9):1210-4. 24. Barnsteiner JH,
et al. Promoting interprofessional education.
Nurs Outlook 2007;55(3):144-50. 25. Buring SM, et al. Interprofessional education: definitions, student competencies, and guidelines for implementation. Am J Pharm Educ 2009;73(4):59. 26. Bridges DR, et al. Interprofessional
collaboration: three best
practice models of interprofessional education. Med Educ Online 2011;16. 27. Institute of Medicine. Keeping patients safe:
transforming
the work environment of nurses. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. Richard and Hinda Rosenthal lectures. 28.
Kurtzman ET, Fauteux N. Ten years after Keeping patients
safe: have nurses work environments been transformed? Washington, DC: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; George
Washington University School of Nursing; 2014 Mar 2014. 29. Carlson JJ, et al. Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health
Policy 2010;96(3):179-90.
54 AJN
March 2015 Vol. 115, No. 3 ajnonline.com