MCEO Concept Paper
MCEO Concept Paper
MCEO Concept Paper
Imagine an India, where entrepreneurs and innovators can access the resources
they need to create deep and irreversible social impact!- Mr. Manoj Kumar
Bhatt, Co-founder & CEO, Social Alpha.
The current business space of India is broadly divided into two categories, not
for-profit organizations and for-profit (commercial) enterprises. While the
ecosystem for the enhancement of the start-ups in the commercial segment is
well equipped, there is no such sustainable infrastructure or support existing for
the upcoming social enterprises. Even the underlying philosophy of both the kind
of organizations are in the extreme, while the non-profit organization aims at
doing charity for the base of the pyramid (BoP), the for-profit organizations aim
at selling products and services to the base of the pyramid. While frugal
innovation is a necessity, we should not underestimate the importance of
increasing the purchasing power of the BoP customers. Therefore the need of
bridging the large gap that exists in the social enterprise ecosystem has given
rise to the case for supporting the Undeserving middle. There is an opportunity
to disrupt and defeat poverty at the grass root levels by developing models for
financially sustainable and operationally scalable businesses that evolve at the
intersection of non-profit and commercial organizations.
First, we have to understand the various challenges that are faced by the social
enterprises in the context of starting up. The most prominent problem faced by
social entrepreneurs is the lack of funding avenues to support their ventures in
early stages. Even despite the recent boom in investments, social enterprises
struggle to raise capital because most investors look for lucrative returns in
companies which promise either profits or scale or monetizable assets like
intellectual property and user base. Hence most social entrepreneurs are left
with options where such returns are not the motivation donations, grants, and
subsidies. These sources of funds are limited and not easy to crack without a
proven track record, making it a chicken-and-egg problem.
A lot of social ventures have constraints to profitability built into their business
models. Due to the nature of the problems these entrepreneurs try to solve, most
conventional cost-cutting strategies like automation, cheaper sourcing of raw
materials, etc. cannot be adopted because they would defeat the core objectives
of the venture. This makes it tougher to achieve sustainability of the ventures.
Another challenge for social ventures is competition with mainstream businesses
in their target markets. Due to limited resources, most social companies are
unable to invest in talent, branding, marketing and distribution of their products
and services at the scale and aggressiveness of their mainstream competitors.
As a result, they fail to acquire and retain most customers who differentiate
between businesses based on brand power or pricing.
Growth is a tricky goal for most social enterprises. In an era of internet enabled
businesses which scale rapidly, very few social entrepreneurs succeed in growing
their ventures beyond their established. Mostly this arises due to the uniqueness
of the problem being solved the solution is a highly localized one and hence
cannot be applied elsewhere. Even if the product or service is generic enough to