Palatal Approach Rationale Ochenbein

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Title: The palatal approach to osseous surgery

I. Rationale

Authors: Ochenbein
C, Bohannan H.

Source: JOP, 1963.


Type : review
Reviewer: Sultan ALGhaithi

Review Date: 06/02/16


Species: Human

Rating: Good

AIM:
The purpose of this paper is to discuss poor or reverse gingival architecture on the buccal aspect of
maxillary molar teeth, and to introduce the palatal approach as a further refinement, and as a
possible solution to some of the problems to be discussed.
Architectural patterns:
- Normally the interporximal bone is at a more coronal level than that on the buccal and lingual root
surfaces. This same scalloped pattern is then reflected in the overlying gingival tissue.
- In disease the most frequent indication of a deviation from this normal architectural pattern has been
found to be the development of the interporximal periodontal pocket. crater development as a result of
interporximal inflammation.

Traditional approaches to osseous surgery :


Historically the surgery was performed by removing the interdental crater and adjacent marginal
bone, most use buccal approach and removal the buccal wall of crater only, even though removal
of buccal and lingual is recommended (produced an acceptable result). problems developed by
this approach include:
Reverse gingival architecture, denudation of buccal surface, buccal recession, and inadequate
buccal embrasure space.

The palatal approach:


Palatal approach should not be considered as the sole mean of treatment of maxillary molars,
most medium to deep craters will require some reduction of the buccal wall of the crater along
with the complete reduction of the palatal wall of the crater.
Advantages of palatal approach:
Gross reduction is done on the palatal aspect in attempt to preserve bone hight on buccal to avoid
problems mentioned, avoidance of dehiscence and fenestration on the buccal because of the thin
buccal plate, wider embrasure space on the palatal, cleansing effect of tongue, more adequate
access and visibility, and the abundance of keratinized tissue on the palatal.

Conclusion: The rationale for a refinement in the surgical management of this area has been
presented with special attention given the unique anatomical features of the area and the
significance of recent studies on periodontal wound healing.

You might also like