Operation Strategy at Galanz Case Study Cas

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Submitted By- Chandramani

Kumar

Development Management Institute


Patna
Operation Strategy at Glanz
Assignment 1
The largest microwave oven manufacturer in the world. Competed based on
lowest

cost

through

efficient

utilization

of

capacity

and

process

improvement. Combining OBM, OEM and ODM to achieve economy of scale.


60%-70% of the domestic in 2002 and 50% of the international market share
in 2007. Increased production lines through free production line transfer
Gained the right to use its excess capacity of production line for its own
products Component suppliers were encouraged to set up manufacturing
facilities at Galanz.
Price War
Adoption of penetration pricing leveraging economies of scale. Expansion of
production capacity to exceed market demand. Aggressive pricing strategy
lead many industry players like LG & Panasonic to withdraw from the market.
Transformation from OEM to ODM
Shortage of Magnetron because of retrenchment of its suppliers. Designed &
developed its own magnetron. Galanz magnetron subsidiary started mass
production.
Enhanced R&D capability & production innovation:
Two R&D units were setup in 1995 & 1997. Investment in R&D was more
than 3% of annual revenue. Redesigning products with focus on new features
& technologies. Low Brand Awareness in Foreign market .Foreign market not
familiar with the brand Galanz Partnership with MNCs like Wal-Mart & K-Mart
were confined to OEM deals only. Globalization causing fierce competition of
branded products. Conflict of interest of OBM & OEM business Setup sales &

service business either on its own or through its channel partner. This could
lead to becoming competitor to its OEM customer.
Antitrust (Anti-monopoly) lawsuit
The company is accused of monopolizing the market by dumping its product
Inefficient Production Planning Strived to producing more than demand Sales
forecasting & production planning capabilities were nil Combined Strategy.
Analysis
Galanz most important objective was cost, it only had an abundant supply of
labor and land.
Delivering quality product. Became the leading company of the market. The
supplier refused to supply the most important component magnetron to it. It
develop its own design, innovation. In 1997, the company initiated major
invest in magnetron. By 2000, the company was able to design and produce
its own magnetron. The company was able to produce only 16 million units
where the demand was 25 million units in 2003. Galanz found itself
outsourcing part of the magnetron production to other companies. The
problem was solved by outsourcing with the Japanese company. It produced
oven for the domestic market with its own brand name, while production
technology was produced from Japan. It produced microwave ovens at low
cost, combined with its enhanced R&D ability had allowed it to compete with
major successful players like Panasonic, Toshiba and LG.
Galanzs Operations Strategy
Identification of potential product. Blueprint purchased from world leader
(Toshiba) in microwave oven equipment and Technology producer in early
1990s. Factory set up with professional engineers with ample knowledge of
this technology. Advantage of abundant supply of cheap labors and land.
Cost leadership strategy to increase the market share.
Growth

Cost leadership strategy. Strategic alliance with other big appliance


companies and its suppliers. Full utilization of resources. Shift toward product
oriented process. Increase its production scale and reduce production cost.
Tactics of price war to dominate to competitors in domestic market. Focus on
enhancing the distribution of product. Existing products improvement and
design

&

development

of

new

product.

Strategic

partnerships

with

multinational companies.
OEM business in the international market
Employing OEM method was proven to be success factor of Galanz Reasons
Galanz went into global market using OEM business. Enabled the company to
use its own manufacturing equipments. Galanz exceeded other Chinese
manufacturers.
OEM microwave ovens- the primary exports.
No brand recognition to the end users. Investment in R&D and import of new
technologies allowed to cost reduction and differentiation. Transfer from OEM
to ODM after production of magnetrons in own company.
OBM Dilemma
Increase demand for branded products because of competition in MNCs.
Galanzs produced products at low cost with good quality. Exported products
without any idea about brand name to the end users. Exploration of brand
name to the users can be possible through OBM business. The company
doesnt have to change its cost leadership because price reductions
increased sales by about 100%. The purposes of this price war were to
consolidate the industry by marginalizing small, inefficient players before
they had a chance to grow and discourage new entrants. A high profit margin
in the industry would encourage excessive entry The first benefit is the Cost,
second is the Low Risk and third could be merger and acquisition. Priorities
to achieve competitive advantage-

High Quality
Fast Delivery
Reliable Delivery
Flexibility

Problems and Solutions


In order to lead the company to greater success execute a joint venture.
Venture into wholly-owned subsidiary types to international expansion.
Should try to setup a link Joint Venture with another house appliances
manufacturer such as GE or its competitors like Sharp and/or Panasonic.
Forming a Joint Venture would present Galanz with various advantages. They
may also look for merger and acquisition. Future competitive strategy for the
combination of OEM, ODM and OBM businesses. Effective sharing of value
chain activities. Effective resource allocation for competitive advantage.
Vertical relationship to adopt for magnetron production.

You might also like