Multihazard Mitigation Plan Bond County Illinois

Hazard Mitigation Plan
Bond County, Illinois
Adoption Date: -- _______________________ -Primary Point of Contact

The Point of Contact for information regarding this plan is:
Allan L. Davis, Coordinator
Bond County 9-1-1 and Emergency Services & Disaster Agency
200 W. College, PO Box 128
Greenville, Illinois 62246
Phone/Fax (618) 664-1911
[email protected]
Secondary Point of Contact

Robert Neer
Emergency Services & Disaster Agency
200 W. College, PO Box 128
Greenville, Illinois 62246
Phone: (618)410-6213
Prepared by: Southwestern Illinois Metropolitan and Regional Planning Commission
2511 Vandalia
Collinsville, Illinois 62234
Phone: (618) 344-4250
Fax: (618) 344-4253
Kevin J. Terveer, Executive Director, [email protected]
Linda Tragesser, Community Planner, [email protected]
and
Department of Geology
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, Illinois 62901
and
The Polis Center
1200 Waterway Blvd. Suite 100
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-2455
BOND COUNTY OFFICIALS

COUNTY BOARD
Jill Franks, Chair
Joe Whalen, Vice Chair
Frank Lucco
Jack Langel
Gerald McCray
SHERIFF
Jeffrey Brown
COUNTY CLERK/RECORDER
Randy Reitz
CIRCUIT CLERK
John King
STATES ATTORNEY
Christopher Bauer
CORONER
Alan Young
REGIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS

Mark Drone
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
George Shaw
HEALTH DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Maxine Barth
Table of Contents
Section 1 Public Planning Process
1.1 Narrative Description
1.2 Planning Team Information
1.3 Public Involvement in Planning Process
1.4 Neighboring Community Involvement
1.5 Review of Technical and Fiscal Resources
1.6 Review of Existing Plans
Section 2 Jurisdiction Participation Information
2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body
2.2 Jurisdiction Participation
Section 3 Jurisdiction Information
3.1 Topography
3.2 Climate
3.3 Demographics
3.4 Economy
3.5 Industry
3.6 Land Use and Development Trends
3.7 Major Lakes, Rivers, and Watersheds
Section 4 Risk Assessment
4.1 Hazard Identification/Profile
4.1.1 Hazard Identification & Definition
4.1.2 Previous Occurrences
4.1.3 Hazard Summary

4.1.4 Multi-Jurisdictional Risk Assessment
4.1.5 Calculated Priority Risk Index
4.1.6 GIS and HAZUS-MH
4.2 Vulnerability Assessment
4.2.1 Asset Inventory
4.2.1.1 Processes and Sources for Identifying Assets
4.3 Future Development
4.4 Individual Hazard Vulnerability Analysis and Loss Estimation
4.4.1 Tornado Hazard Vulnerability Analysis and Loss Estimation
4.4.2 Flood and Dam Failure Hazard Vulnerability Analysis and Loss
Estimation
4.4.3 Earthquake Hazard Vulnerability Analysis and Loss Estimation
4.4.4 Thunderstorm Hazard Vulnerability Analysis and Loss Estimation
4.4.5 Winter Hazard Vulnerability Analysis and Loss Estimation
4.4.6 Hazardous Materials Hazard Vulnerability Analysis and Loss Estimation
4.4.7 Ground Subsidence Vulnerability Analysis and Loss Estimation
Section 5 Mitigation Strategy
5.1 Community Capability
5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
5.1.2 Storm Water Management Stream Maintenance Program/Ordinance
5.1.3 Zoning Management Ordinance
5.1.4 Erosion Management Program/Policy
5.1.5 Fire Insurance Rating Programs/Policy
ii
5.1.6 Land Use Plan

5.1.7 Building Codes
5.2 Mitigation Goals
5.3 Mitigation Actions/Projects
5.4 Implementation Strategy and Analysis of Mitigation Projects
5.5 Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Strategy
Section 6 Plan Maintenance
6.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan
6.2 Implementation through Existing Programs
6.3 Continued Public Involvement
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Minutes of the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Meetings
Appendix B
Articles published by Local Newspaper
Appendix C
Adopting Resolution
Appendix D
Historical Hazards from NCDC
Appendix E
Hazard Map
Appendix F
Complete List of Critical Facilities
Appendix G
Map of Critical Facilities
Appendix H
Recorded NOAA Flood Data: USGS Stream Gauge Data
iii
Bond County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Section 1 - Public Planning Process
1.1 Narrative Description
Hazard Mitigation is defined as any sustained action to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to
human life and property from hazards. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
has made reducing hazards one of its primary goals. Hazard Mitigation Planning and the
subsequent implementation of the projects, measures, and policies developed as part of these
plans, is a primary mechanism in achieving FEMAs goal.
The Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP) is a requirement of the Federal Disaster Mitigation
Act of 2000 (DMA 2000). The development of a local government plan is a requirement in order
to maintain eligibility for certain federal disaster assistance and hazard mitigation funding
programs. In order for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) communities to be eligible
for future mitigation funds, they must adopt an MHMP.
The Bond County Multi-Hazard Mitigation (MHMP)Planning Committee was established in
April of 2008 to define and prioritize the risks in the county and to develop this mitigation plan
to minimize both the risks and the consequences of the defined hazards. This team has worked
closely on previous mitigation projects such as siren identification and location, area zoning
considerations, identification and inventory of hazardous materials, and area training of response
personnel. The team will continue to work together to develop and implement mitigation
initiatives developed as part of the plan.
In recognition of the importance of planning in mitigation activities, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) has created HAZUS-MH (Hazards USA Multi-Hazard) a
powerful geographic information system (GIS)-based disaster risk assessment tool. This tool
enables communities of all sizes to predict the estimated losses from floods, hurricanes,
earthquakes, and other related phenomena and to measure the impact of various mitigation
practices that might help reduce those losses. The Illinois Emergency Management Agency
(IEMA) has determined that HAZUS-MH should play a critical role in the risk assessments in
Illinois. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (SIU) and The Polis Center at Indiana
University Purdue University Indianapolis (Polis) are assisting Bond County planning staff with
performing the hazard risk assessment.
1.2 Planning Team Information
The Bond County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Team is headed by Kevin Terveer, and
Allan L. Davis of Bond County ESDA is the primary point of contact. Members of the planning
team include representatives from Bond County elected officials and various county
departments, the Regional Planning Commission, cities and villages, and public/private utilities.
Table 1-1 identifies the planning team individuals and the organizations they represent.
Section1PublicPlanningProcessFebruary,2010
Page1

Table 1-1: Multi Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name
Allan L. Davis
Title
Coordinator
Organization
Emergency Services & Disaster Agency
Jurisdiction
Bond County
Executive Director
Southwestern Illinois Metropolitan and

Regional Planning Commission
Southwestern Illinois Region
Community Planner
Southwestern Illinois Metropolitan and

Regional Planning Commission
Jill Franks
Chair
County Board
Bond County
Allan Davis
Coordinator
County 911 Board
Bond County
Allan Davis
Coordinator
City ESDA
City of Greenville
Matt Wilman
Code Enforcement
City Administration
City of Greenville
Board Member
Bond County Board
City of Greenville
Hiram Renfro
Village President
Village Board
Village of Donnellson
Tom Hoffman
Coordinator
Kevin Terveer
Linda Tragesser
Gerald McCray
Duane Wiegmann
Greenville Regional Hospital EMS,

Village of Keyesport FPD
Village of Keyesport
Chief
Keyesport Fire Protection District
Village President
Village Board
Village of Mulberry Grove
Michael G. Knebel
Trustee
Village Board
Village of Panama
Dolly M. Knebel
Citizen
Village Board
Village of Panama
Steve Plocher
Chief
Highland-Pierron Fire Protection District
Village of Pierron
James Moore
Trustee
Village Board
Village of Pocahontas
Joe Rakers
Trustee
Doug Enloe
Village Board
Pocahontas-Old Ripley Fire & EMS
Village of Old Ripley
Village President
Village Board
Village of Smithboro
Dale R. Deverick
Chief
Smithboro Fire Protection District
Edward Wallace
Village President
Village Board
Village of Sorento
Trustee
Village Board
Village of Sorento
Lora Kennedy
Linda Hansen
The Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) planning regulations and guidance stress that planning team
members must be active participants. The Bond County MHMP committee members were
actively involved on the following components:
Attending the MHMP meetings

Providing available Geographic Information System (GIS) data and historical hazard
information
Reviewing and providing comments on the draft plans
Coordinating and participating in the public input process
Coordinating the formal adoption of the plan by the county
An MHMP kickoff meeting was held at the Bond County Annex in the Board Room on April 29,
2008. Representatives of Clinton County, Bond County, and SIMAPC attended the meeting.
Nicholas Pinter of SIU-C explained the rationale behind the MHMP program and answered
questions from the participants.
Page2

Jonathan Remo from SIU provided an introduction to hazards, and Dan Coats and John Buechler
from The Polis Center provided an overview of HAZUS-MH. Professor Pinter described the
timeline and the process of the mitigation planning project and presented Clinton County and
Bond County with a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for sharing data and information.
The Bond County ESDA Coordinator and County Board Chairman, working with Southwestern
Illinois Metropolitan and Regional Planning Commission (SIMAPC), organized the committee
between April and October in 2008, and began gathering the data that would be needed for risk
assessment. Six meetings (including the kick-off meeting) would be needed for the project. The
four phases of the planning process were planned as follows:
PHASE 1:
Organization of Resources
PHASE 2:
Risk Assessment
PHASE 3:
Development of a Mitigation Plan
PHASE 4:
Implementation of the Plan and the Monitoring of Programs
The representative of SIMAPC and the Bond County ESDA assigned tasks to committee
members. The committee determined from the information provided by the Polis Center and
SIU-C that five additional meetings would be held for the following tasks and purposes:
Meeting #2 Discuss Public Participation and review initial critical facilities data
Meeting #3 Prioritize identified Hazards and profile the Hazards for modeling
Meeting #4 Present the draft Risk assessment document and the SIU-C Hazard presentation
Meeting #5 Develop Mitigation Strategies
Meeting #6 Presentation of Draft Plan and discussion of any changes recommended
The date set for completion of the draft plan was June 30, 2009. By November, 2008 the Bond
County ESDA Coordinator and County Board Chairman had appointed additional members to
the committee including a representatives from key County departments as well as
representatives from each of the nine incorporated municipalities within the County. Committee
members had accumulated data concerning many of the county critical facilities, and had
forwarded this data to the SIU-C staff for inclusion in their risk assessment process.
The Bond County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee met on the following dates:
December 2, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.

May 5, 2009
June 24 , 2009
September 2, 2009
Page3
December 2, 2009
These meetings were held in Greenville, Illinois at the Bond County Courthouse in the Board
Room. Each meeting was approximately two hours in length. The meeting agendas, minutes,
and attendance sheets are included in Appendix A. During these meetings, the planning team
successfully identified critical facilities, reviewed hazard data and maps, identified and assessed
the effectiveness of existing mitigation measures, established mitigation projects, and assisted
with preparation of the public participation information.
1.3 Public Involvement in Planning Process
An effort was made to solicit public input during the planning process and a public meeting was
held during the formation of the plan on June 24, 2009. Appendix A contains the agendas and
minutes from each of the public meetings. Appendix B contains articles published by the local
newspaper throughout the public input process.
1.4 Neighboring Community Involvement
The Bond County planning team invited participation from various representatives of county
government, local city and town governments, community groups, local businesses, and colleges.
The team also held two meetings with adjacent counties to obtain their involvement in the
planning process. Details of neighboring stakeholders involvement are summarized in Table 12.
Table 1-2: Neighboring Community Participation
Person Participating
Neighboring Jurisdiction
Organization
Richard Crocker
Clinton County
Clinton County ESDA Coordinator
Frank Miles
Madison County
Madison County Planning and

Development Department
Matt Stroud
Fayette County
Fayette County LEPC
Diana Holmes
Montgomery County
Montgomery County LEPC
Steve Nagle
East West Gateway Council

of Governments
Director of Community Planning
Participation Description
Neighboring County
Reviewed and commented on
the plan.
Neighboring county
reviewed plan and provided
comments.
Neighboring county
comments.
Neighboring county
comments.
Metropolitan Planning
AgencyReviewed Plan
1.5 Review of Technical and Fiscal Resources

The MHMP planning team has identified representatives from key agencies to assist in the
planning process. Technical data, reports, and studies were obtained from these agencies. The
organizations and their contributions are summarized in Table 1-3.
Page4

Table 1-3: Key Agency Resources Provided
Agency Name
Illinois Emergency Management Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Water
Bond County Supervisor of Assessments and GIS
Department
Illinois Emergency Management Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Div. of Water
Illinois Department of Employment Security
East-West Gateway Council of Governments
US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census
United States Geological Survey

Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic
Opportunity
US Department of Agriculture, National Resources
Conservation Services
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
Illinois State Geographical Survey
Illinois State Climatologist
National Climatic Data Center
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Southwestern Illinois Resource Conservation and
Development
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Southwestern Illinois Metropolitan and Regional
Planning Commission
Regional Commerce and Growth Association (St.
Louis Chamber)
Resources Provided
Provided list of repetitive properties
Provided reports about dams, levees,
flooding
Hydrologic Data
Tax System Data Base, Parcel Map, Ortho
Map
Illinois 2007 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Provided reports about existing land
subsidence issue
Watershed and stream data
Economic and Demographic Data
Regional Demographic and Economic Data
Demographics and Physical Characteristics,
2007 Census of Agriculture, County
Business Patterns
Land Cover, Topography
Economic Data and Community Profiles
Soils and Geological data, Physical
Characteristics
2007 Personal Income By County
Topography, Physiography, Coal Mining
Climate Data
Climate Data
Illinois 2008 Section 303(d) Listed Waters
and watershed maps.
Conservation Data
Flood Hazard Information
Future Land Use Plan 2012 of Clinton
County, Future Land Use and Transportation
of Bond County,
Business Data, Demographics
1.6 Review of Existing Plans

Bond County has a solid tradition of community development planning tradition. The County
and its associated local communities utilized a variety of planning documents to direct
community development. These documents include land use plans, master plans, emergency
response plans, municipal ordinances, and building codes. The MHMP planning process
incorporated the existing natural hazard mitigation elements from previous planning efforts.
Table 1-4 lists the plans, studies, reports, and ordinances used in the development of the plan.
Page5

Table 1-4: Planning Documents Used for MHMP Planning Process
Author(s)
Southwestern
Illinois Metro &
Regional
Planning
Commission
Southwestern
Illinois Metro &
Regional
Planning
Commission
Year
2003 2008
1990
Title
Description
Where Used
Comprehensive
Economic
Development
Strategy (CEDS)
Lists economic and community

projects for local governments.
Includes mitigation to prevent
developing in floodplain and
building safer structures to
withstand a potential
earthquake.
Mitigation strategies from

this plan were incorporated
Bond County Future

Land Use Plan
Comprehensive plan for land

use, transportation, and public
facilities.
Sections related to hazards

incorporated into MHMP.
This codebook includes

ordinances for floodplain, and
planning / zoning.
These ordinances were

considered for MHMP
because they are designed
to mitigate hazards.
Comprehensive plan for land

use, transportation, and public
facilities.

Revised Code of
Ordinances of Bond
County Illinois
Bond County
City of
Greenville
2004
Comprehensive Plan
City of
Greenville
1974
Greenville Zoning
Ordinance
Land Use Regulations

City of
Greenville
1974
Subdivision
Ordinance
Land Use and Subdividing

Regulations

City of
Greenville
Minimum Housing
Standards
Ordinance
Housing Code for the City
1974

City of
Greenville
1974
Lake and Reservoirs

Ordinance
Management and Regulation of

Development of the City Lake

Page6

Section 2 - Jurisdiction Participation Information
The jurisdictions included in this multi-jurisdictional plan are listed in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1: Participating Jurisdictions
Jurisdiction Name
Bond County
Honorable Jill Franks, County Board Chairman
City of Greenville
Honorable Alan Gaffner, Mayor
Honorable Hiram Renfro, Village President
Honorable Kenneth Carver, Village President
Honorable Doug Enloe, Village President
Honorable James Carpenter, Village President
Village of Panama
Honorable Edgar Reed, Village President
Village of Pierron
Honorable Ron Hartnagle, Village President
Honorable David Clark, Village President
Honorable Lora Kennedy, Village President
Village of Sorento
Honorable Edward Wallace, Village President
In addition, there are thirteen unincorporated communities in Bond County: Ayers, Beaver
Creek, Bunje, Dudleyville, Durley, Gilmore, Hamburg, Hookdale, Pleasant Mound, Reno,
Stubblefield, Tamalco, and Woburn.
2.1 Adoption by local governing body

The draft plan was made available on December 2, 2009 to the planning team and other agencies
including Fayette County LEPC, Montgomery County LEPC, Madison County Planning and
Development, and East West Gateway Council of Governments for review. Comments were then
accepted. The Bond County Hazard Mitigation Planning team presented and recommended the
plan to Bond County Board, and the Bond County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan was
subsequently adopted on ________________. Resolution adoptions are included in Appendix C
of this plan.
2.2 Jurisdiction Participation
It is required that each jurisdiction participates in the planning process. Table 2-2 on the
following page lists each jurisdiction and describes its participation in the construction of this
plan.
Table 2-2: Jurisdiction Participation
Section2JurisdictionParticipationInformationFebruary,2010
Page7

Jurisdiction Name
Participating Member
Participation Description
Bond County
Jill Franks, County Board Chairman
Member, MHMP planning committee
Bond County, City of Greenville
Allan Davis, County 911 Board, ESDA

Coordinator
Bond County, City of Greenville
Gerald McCrary
City of Greenville
Matt Willman
Hiram Renfro
Tom Hoffman, Keyesport FPD
Duane Wiegmann, Keyesport FPD
Doug Enloe
Pocahontas & Old Ripley
Joe Rakers
Village of Panama
Michael G. Knebel
Village of Panama
Dolly M. Knebel
Village of Pierron
Steve Plocher, Pierron Fire Protection Dist.
James Moore
Lora Kennedy
Dale Deverick, Smithboro FPD
Village of Sorento
Edgar Wallace
Village of Sorento
Linda Hansen
Kevin Terveer, SIMAPC Exec. Dir.
Linda Tragesser, SIMAPC

Community Planner
Section2JurisdictionParticipationInformationFebruary,2010
Page8

Section 3 - Jurisdiction Information
Historical Information
Settlers first arrived in what is now Bond County in approximately 1806. Between 1806 and
1808 a prairie fort, Hills Fort, was established at a location about 5 miles west of the present
City of Greenville, and provided settlers protection from Native American attacks. The fort
consisted of a blockhouse and stockade enclosing two cabins. Bond County was formally
organized in 1817 out of Madison County and was named in honor of Shadrack Bond, an Army
Colonel in the War of 1812 who would later become the first Governor of Illinois. According to
the Bond County Historical Societys website:
The original boundary of Bond County was a 26 mile wide strip
that started just a few miles south of its current border and stretched
all the way to Lake Superior in the present state of Wisconsin.
Bond was one of 11 original counties when Illinois applied for
statehood in 1818.
In 1821 Fayette and Montgomery Counties were formed out of Bond County, and Greenville,
one of Illinois oldest towns having been founded in 1815, became the County Seat. In 1824
Clinton County was formed partially from Bond County, and the State Legislature later gave
Bond County a portion of Madison County to recompense for some of the earlier reductions in
the Bond Countys size. The County has historically consisted of a largely rural population and
agriculture is the chief occupation with corn, wheat, and soybeans being the staple products and
livestock being on raised on many of the farms. Small villages and towns sprang up to provide
the services needed by the agrarian lifestyle. In 1836 the National Road reached all the way to
Vandalia, and by 1868 an east-west railroad was completed with Mulberry Grove, Smithboro,
Greenville, and Pocahontas being situated along this important transportation asset. Development
within the County was encouraged by the enhancements in transportation.
Today, location and transportation continue to be major assets for Bond
County. The major metropolitan area of St. Louis, Missouri lies slightly more
than forty miles to the southwest of the western county line. Over 22,000
vehicles per day travel along Interstate Highway 70 that traverses the County
from east to west, and Interstates 64, 57, and 55 are all nearby. The CSX,
Burlington Northern, and Illinois Western Railroads all service the County, and
MidAmerica Airport and St. Louis Lambert International Airport provide air
service to the region. Port facilities are available within 40 miles, and motor
freight carriers in the area are abundant.
Bond County
3.1 Topography
Bond County is located at coordinates 3853N, 8926W (38.88,-89.44) in the southwestern
region of Illinois about 41 miles east of the St. Louis Metropolitan area. It has an area of
approximately 383 square miles of which 380 square miles are land and roughly 3 square miles
are covered by water. It is bordered on the north by Montgomery County; on the east by Fayette
Section3JurisdictionInformationFebruary,2010
Page9

County; on the west by Madison County and, and on the south by Clinton County. Elevations in
Bond County range from about 430 feet above sea level in the southeast corner in the bottom
lands known as Dutch Flats near Carlyle Lake and the Kaskaskia River. The upper elevations
range from 500 feet on the uplands in the southern section of the county, and ultimately to 650
feet above sea level in the far northeastern part of the County.
Municipality
Donnellson
Panama
Sorento
Greenville
MulberryGrove
Smithboro
OldRipley
Pierron
Pocahontas
Keyesport
Elevation
611feet
596feet
591feet
550feet
549feet
548feet
540feet
517feet
498feet
450feet
The area now known as Bond County was covered by sheets of ice during the Illinoian
Glaciation. When the glaciers receded they deposited glacial drift debris and glacial till, and left
the land basically flat with a pattern of elongated ridges. In addition, the meltwaters from the
glaciation formed streams which cut valleys and deposited additional glacial and alluvial
material.
The county has a general slope from north to south which is attributable to the
Kaskaskia River Watershed. For the most part the terrain is nearly level to gently rolling with
steep slopes greater than 15% occurring in substantial areas adjacent to the major branches of
Shoal Creek and near the Fayette County line.
Bond County is drained by Carlyle Lake, the Kaskaskia River, and Shoal, East Shoal, and
Beaver Creeks, which are responsible for much of the alluvial deposits found in the valleys and
the stream terraces.
The branches of Shoal Creek dissect the central areas of the County
forming a distinct Y shape. Carlyle Lake and Governor Bond are significant ground water
reservoirs which provide flat water recreation and water supply.
Soils in Bond County have developed from glacial or alluvial deposits. Much of the soils
formed in loess, the windblown material that covers much of the glacial till plains. The
remainder of the soils formed in alluvial material transported by water and deposited on flood
plains during flooding. The General Soils Associations in the county are Piasa-Cowden,
Oconee-Darmstadt,
Hickory-Marine-Hosmer,
Wakeland-Lawson,
Ava-Hickory-Parke,
Hoyleton-Cisne-Huey, and Bluford-Hickory-Atlas. Its geological formation is similar to that of
other counties in the same section. Thick layers of limestone lie near the surface, with coal
Page10

seams underlying the same at varying depths. The soil is varied, being at some points black and
loamy and at others (under timber) decidedly clayey.
3.2 Climate
Bond Countys climate is typical of Southwestern Illinois and is classified as humid continental.
The variables of temperature, precipitation, and snowfall can vary greatly from one year to the
next. Winter temperatures can fall below freezing starting as early as October and extending as
late as April. Based on National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), normals from 1971 to 2000, in
winter, on average the lowest normal winter temperature, occuring in January, is 18.8 F, and the
average normal high, occurring in March, is 53.7 F. In summer, the average normal low,
occurring in June, is 62.1 F and average normal high, occurring in July is 87.7 F. Average
annual precipitation is 40.64 inches throughout the year.
3.3 Demographics
The United States Census Bureau has estimated the 2007 population of Bond County at 18,103.
At the 2000 Census the county had a population of 17,633 with a density of 46 persons per
square mile and 18 housing units per square mile. Between the 1990 Census and the 2000
Census the Countys population increased by 17.6%, which may be somewhat attributable to the
population at the Federal Correctional Institution. The average household size is 2.60 persons
compared to an average state family size of 3.10 persons. The Countys largest municipality is
Greenville, the county seat.
The County population is spread out through nine townships
including:
Township
2007
Est. Population
Burgess
Central
Lagrange
Mills
Mulberry Grove
Old Ripley
Pleasant Mound
Shoal Creek
Tamalco
2,424
8,014
984
595
1,399
834
1,306
1,945
602
2000
Population
2,391
7,941
942
554
1,360
796
1,178
1,896
575
Source: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, American Factfinder

Southwestern Illinois Planning Commission
The 2000 Census also shows the Countys population is also spread out by age with 21.9% being
under the age of eighteen, and 14.7% were 65 or older. The median age was 37 years. There
were 12,754 households, 6,690 housing units, and the housing density was 18 units per square
miles. The breakdown of 2007 Estimated population by incorporated areas is included in Table
3-1.
Page11

Table 3-1: Population by Community
Community
2008 Population Estimate
% of County
18,253
100%
256
1.4%*
7,396
40.5%
466
2.6%*
658
3.6%
124
0.6%
Village of Panama
316
1.7%*
Village of Pierron
646
3.5%
717
3.9%
232
1.3%
Village of Sorento
602
3.3%
Bond County
City of Greenville
Source: American FactFinder , 2008 Population Estimates

*The communities of Keyesport, Donnellson, and Panama lie in more than one county, and their Bond County portion of the population is not discernible
from the American Fact Finder 2007 population estimate. Figures shown for those municipalities include persons living in adjoining counties.
Page12

3.4 Economy
Illinois MapStats reported a civilian work force of 8,816 for 2006, and that 6,077 (68.9%) of the
workforce in Clinton County were employed in the private sector. The breakdown is included in
Table 3-2.
Educational and Health Services represents the largest sector, employing
approximately 13.2% of the workforce.. The 2000 Census shows the annual per capita income
(PCI) in Bond County is $17,947compared to an Illinois average of $23,104. Bond Countys
PCI is 83.1% of the U.S. National PCI of $21,587.
Table 3-2: Industrial Employment by Sector
Industrial Sector
% of County Workforce
(2006 Base year)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, and mining
880
(9.98%)
Self-employed
390
(4.4%)
Construction
183
(2.1%)
Manufacturing
725
(8.2%)
Wholesale trade
376
(4.3%
Retail trade
484
(5.5%)
Transportation, warehousing and utilities
236
(2.7%)
Professional and Business Services
148
(1.7%)
96
( 1.1%)
Finance, insurance, real estate, and rental/leasing
133
(1.6%)
Administrative & Waste management services
89
( 1.0%)
1,161
(13.2%)
Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation and food services
324
(3.7%)
Personal and other services(except public administration)
418
(3.1%)
Public administration (Government excluding Post Office, Educ., & Hospital)
612
(6.9%)
Information
Educational, health, and social services
Total all industries:
6,077
Source: http://lmi.ides.state.il.us/projections/countyfiles/lt/industry/Clinton.xls, accessed 12/15/08

http://fedstates.gov/qf/states/17/17005.html, accessed 4/22/09
http://censtats.census.gov/cgi-bin/cbpnaic/cpspsect.pl, accessed 4/22/09
Page13

3.5 Industry
Bond Countys major employers and
approximate number of employees are listed
in Table 3-3. The largest employer is CarlisleSynTec which is located in Greenville and
has nearly 250 employees, but does have
seasonal force reductions. They have a large
manufacturing plant and a separate 294,000
square ft. warehouse completed in 2007 at a
cost of $10,000,000. DeMoulin Brothers &
Company is the second largest, with
approximately 200 full-time employees.
New Carlisle-SynTec $10 million Warehouse in Greenville
Table 3-3: Major Employers

Company Name
Location
NAICS CODE
Employees
Type of Business
Manufacturing
DeMoulin Bros. & Co.
Greenville
315
100-249
Uniforms Manufacturers
Carlyle SynTec
Greenville
444
250
Nevco Scoreboard Manuf.
Greenville
339 & 423
50-99
Manufacturer
Peterson Spring
Greenville
332
20-49
Fabricated Metals Manufacturing
Coviden
Greenville
446
50-99
Health Care Products
Enertech
Greenville
50-99
Geo-Thermal Units
Building Materials
Refuse Systems
Allied Waste Service
Greenville
562
50-99
Garbage Collection Landfill
Information Technology
Bass-Mollet Publishers Inc
Greenville
511
20-49
Publishing Industries
Construction and Specialty Trades

Eagle Panel Systems
Joiner Sheet Metal & Roofing
Mulberry
Grove
423
20-49
Manufacturers Agents & Reps
Greenville
238
20-49
Roofing Contractors
Page14

Table 3-3: Major Employers (Contd)
Company Name
Location
NAICS CODE
Employees
Type of Business
Agriculture
Greenville Livestock , Inc
Greenville
424
20-49
Livestock Dealers (wholesale)
Wholesale and Retail

United Stationers Supply Co.
Greenville
424
250+
Stationery Wholesale
Capri IGA Foodliner
Greenville
445
50-99
Grocers Retail
Buchheit Country SuperStore
Greenville
452
20-49
Department Store
Transportation Services
Loves Travel Center
Greenville
Petroleum-retail
Donnewald Distributing
Greenville
Beverage Distributors
Education and Health, Government
Greenville Regional Hospital
Greenville
622
250-499
Greenville College
Greenville
611
20-49
Federal Correction Institution
Greenville
311
Hospitals
Schools
Penitentiary
Source: Illinois Workforce Information Center, http://wic.ilworkinfo.com/analyzer/empseldata.asp, accessed 12/15/2008
3.6 Land Uses and Development Trends

Agriculture is the predominant land use in Bond County. Corn is the primary crop, followed by
soybeans, winter wheat, hay, and oats. Other significant land uses are industrial and residential
within the incorporated areas. A Federal Corrections Center is located in Greenville with a
significant inmate population. The Land Use Plan maps for Bond County and the City of
Greenville are included on the following pages.
Page15
Page16
Page17

3.7 Major Lakes, Rivers and Watersheds
Bond County lies within of one of Illinois Priority
Watersheds. The Kaskaskia River is the most
managed river in Illinois for water supply use
according to the Illinois State Water Survey of the
Department of Natural Resources in its Prioritizing
Illinois Aquifers and Watersheds for Water Supply
Planning, July, 2006.
The U.S. Corps of
Engineers Carlyle Lake Dam on the Kaskaskia at
the City of Carlyle in neighboring Clinton County,
107 miles above its confluence with the Mississippi,
creates a 26,000-acre reservoir 15 miles long by
3.5 miles wide the largest man-made lake in
Illinois.
Source: Illinois State Water Survey2006
Source: US EPA, http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/county.cfm?fips=17005, accessed 5/1/09
Table 3-4: Watersheds

Watershed Name
Middle Kaskaskia, Illinois
Shoal, Illinois
Lower Kaskaskia, Illinois
Hydrologic Unit Code

07140202
07140203
01740204
Source: U.S. Geological Survey HUC14 Watersheds,
Page18
Watersheds in Southwestern Illinois
Watersheds
Great
Rivers,
Lakes,
Bays,
Inland
Coastal
Lakes
Streams, Ponds, Estuaries
Wetlands
Lake
Shorelines
Connecting
(Acres) Shoreline
Creeks Reservoir (Square
(Miles)
Channel
(Miles)
(Acres)
Miles)
(Miles)
(Miles)
364.59 11,219.50
0
0
0
0
0
445.60 26,925.80
0
0
0
0
0
216.16 4,529.40
0
0
0
0
0
268.48 3,085.10
0
0
0
0
0
482.60
613.60
0
0
0
0
0
UPPERKASKASKIA
MIDDLEKASKASKIA
SHOAL
CAHOKIAJOACHIM
LOWERKASKASKIA
Source: US Environmental Protection Agency, National Assessment Database 2006.

http://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/w305b_report_control.get_report?p_state=IL&p_cycle=#assessed_waters, accessed 4/29/2009
Page19

Section 4 - Risk Assessment
The goal of mitigation is to reduce the future impacts of a hazard including loss of life, property
damage, disruption to local and regional economies, and the expenditure of public and private
funds for recovery. Sound mitigation must be based on sound risk assessment. Risk assessment
involves quantifying the potential loss resulting from a disaster by assessing the vulnerability of
buildings, infrastructure, and people. This assessment identifies the characteristics and potential
consequences of a disaster, how much of the community could be affected by a disaster, and the
impact on community assets. A risk assessment consists of three components: hazard
identification, vulnerability analysis, and risk analysis.
4.1 Hazard Identification/Profile
4.1.1 Existing Plans
The previous Bond County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) did not
contain a risk analysis. Additional local planning documents were reviewed to identify historical
hazards and help identify risk. To facilitate the planning process, FIRM maps were used for the
flood analysis.
4.1.2 Planning Team
During Meeting #2, which occurred on May 5, 2009, the planning team developed and ranked a
list of hazards that affect the county. The team identified 1) severe thunderstorms with tornadoes,
2) winter storms, 3) earthquakes, and 4) flooding which occurs on an annual basis during the
spring. The plan also identified Bond Countys principal technological hazards (in order of
likelihood): 1) land transportation accidents with hazardous material release, 2) mine subsidence,
and 3) dam failure.
4.1.3 National Hazard Records
In addition to these identified hazards, the MHMP planning committee reviewed the list of
natural hazards prepared by FEMA. To assist the planning team, historical storm event data was
compiled from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC; http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgiwin/wwcgi.dll). This NCDC data included 192 reported events in Bond County between
December 2, 1950 and April 2, 2008. A summary table of events related to each hazard type is
included in the hazard profile sections that follow. List of the events, including additional
sources that identify specific occurrences, are included as Appendix D. In addition to NCDC
data, Storm Prediction Center (SPC) data associated with tornadoes, strong winds, and hail were
plotted using SPC recorded latitude and longitude. These events are plotted and included as
Appendix E. The list of NCDC hazards is included in Table 4-1.
Section4RiskAssessmentFebruary2010
Page20

Table 4-1: Climatic Data Center Historical Hazards
Hazard
Tornadoes
Severe Thunderstorms
Drought/Extreme Heat
Winter Storms
Flood/Flash flood
4.1.4 Hazard Ranking Methodology

Based on planning team input, national datasets, and existing plans, Table 4-2 lists the hazards
Bond County will address in this multi-hazard mitigation plan. In addition, these hazards ranked
the highest based on the Risk Priority Index discussed in section 4.1.5.
Table 4-2: Planning Team Hazard List
Hazard
Winter Storms
Tornados
Hazardous Material Release
Earthquakes
Flooding
Mine Subsidence
Dam Failure
4.1.5 Calculating the Risk Priority Index

The first step in determining the Risk Priority Index (RPI) was to have the planning team
members generate a list of hazards which have befallen or could potentially befall their
community. Next, the planning team members were asked to assign a likelihood rating based on
the criteria and methods described in the following table. Table 4-3 displays the probability of
the future occurrence ranking. This ranking was based upon previous history and the definition
of hazard. Using the definitions given, the likelihood of future events is "Quantified" which
results in the classification within one of the four "Ranges" of likelihood.
Page21

Table 4-3: Future Occurrence Ranking
Probability
Characteristics
4 - Highly Likely
Event is probable within the calendar year.

Event has up to 1 in 1 year chance of occurring. (1/1=100%)
History of events is greater than 33% likely per year.
3 - Likely
Event is probable within the next three years.

Event has up to 1 in 3 years chance of occurring. (1/3=33%)
History of events is greater than 20% but less than or equal to 33% likely per year.
2 - Possible
Event is probable within the next five years.

History of events is greater than 10% but less than or equal to 20% likely per year.
1 - Unlikely
Event is possible within the next ten years.

History of events is less than or equal to 10% likely per year.
Next, planning team members were asked to consider the potential magnitude/severity of the
hazard according to the severity associated with past events of the hazard. Table 4-4 gives four
classifications of magnitude/severity.
Table 4-4: Hazard Magnitude
Magnitude/Severity
Characteristics
8 - Catastrophic
Multiple deaths.
Complete shutdown of facilities for 30 or more days.
More than 50% of property is severely damaged.
4 - Critical
Injuries and/or illnesses result in permanent disability.

Complete shutdown of critical facilities for at least 14 days.
2 - Limited
Injuries and/or illnesses do not result in permanent disability.

Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than seven days.
1 - Negligible
Injuries and/or illnesses are treatable with first aid.

Minor quality of life lost.
Shutdown of critical facilities and services for 24 hours or less.
Less than 10% of property is severely damaged.
Finally, the RPI was calculated by multiplying the probability by the magnitude/severity of the
hazard. Using these values, the planning team member where then asked to rank the hazards.
Table 4-5 identifies the RPI and ranking for each hazard facing Bond County.
Page22

Table 4-5: Bond County Hazards (RPI)
Hazard
Probability
Winter Storms
3 - Likely
Magnitude/Severity
4 -Critical
Risk Priority
Index
Rank
12
Tornado
3 - Likely
4 - Critical
12
Hazardous Material Release
3 - Likely
4 - Critical
12
4- Highly Likely
2 - Limited
2 - Possible
4 - Critical
Earthquakes
Flooding
2 - Possible
1 - Negligible
Mine Subsidence
1 -Unlikely
1 - Negligible
Dam Failure
1 -Unlikely
1 - Negligible
4.1.6 Jurisdictional Hazard Ranking

Because the jurisdictions in Bond County differ in their susceptibilities to certain hazardsfor
example, the City of Greenville located along Interstate 70 and a major rail line is more likely to
experience a significant Hazardous Material Release related to a transportation accident than the
village of Sorento which is located a substantial distance away from any major transportation
routethe hazards identified by the planning team were ranked by SIUC using the methodology
outlined in Section 4.1.5. The SIUC rankings were based on input from the other planning team
members, available historical data, and the hazard modeling results described within this hazard
mitigation plan. During the five-year review of the plan, this table will be updated by
representatives from the planning team to ensure these jurisdictional rankings accurately reflect
each communitys assessment of these hazards. Table 4-6 lists the jurisdictions and their
respective hazard rankings (Ranking 1 being the highest concern).
Table 4-6: Hazard Rankings by Jurisdiction
Hazard
Jurisdiction
Tornado
HAZMAT
Earthquake
Thunderstorms
Flooding
Winter
Storms
Subsidence
Dam Failure
Greenville
NA
Donnellson
NA
NA
Keyesport
NA
NA
Mulberry
Grove
NA
NA
Old Ripley
NA
NA
Panama
NA
Pierron
NA
NA
Pocahontas
NA
Smithboro
NA
NA
Sorento
NA
NA = Not applicable
Page23

4.1.7 GIS and HAZUS-MH
The third step in this assessment is the risk analysis, which quantifies the risk to the population,
infrastructure, and economy of the community. Where possible, the hazards were quantified
using GIS analyses and HAZUS-MH. This process reflects a level two approach to analyzing
hazards as defined for HAZUS-MH. The approach includes substitution of selected default data
with local data. Level two analysis significantly improves the accuracy of the model predictions.
HAZUS-MH generates a combination of site-specific and aggregated loss estimates depending
upon the analysis options that are selected and upon the input that is provided by the user.
Aggregate inventory loss estimates, which include building stock analysis, are based upon the
assumption that building stock is evenly distributed across census blocks/tracts. Therefore, it is
possible that overestimates of damage will occur in some areas while underestimates will occur
in other areas. With this in mind, total losses tend to be more reliable over larger geographic
areas than for individual census blocks/tracts. It is important to note that HAZUS-MH is not
intended to be a substitute for detailed engineering studies. Rather, it is intended to serve as a
planning aid for communities interested in assessing their risk to flood-, earthquake-, and
hurricane-related hazards. This documentation does not provide full details on the processes and
procedures completed in the development of this project. It is only intended to highlight the
major steps that were followed during the project.
Site-specific analysis is based upon loss estimations for individual structures. For flooding,
analysis of site-specific structures takes into account the depth of water in relation to the
structure. HAZUS-MH also takes into account the actual dollar exposure to the structure for the
costs of building reconstruction, content, and inventory. However, damages are based upon the
assumption that each structure falls into a structural class, and that structures in each class will
respond in similar fashion to a specific depth of flooding. Site-specific analysis is also based
upon a point location rather than a polygon; therefore the model does not account for the
percentage of a building that is inundated. These assumptions suggest that the loss estimates for
site-specific structures as well as for aggregate structural losses need to be viewed as
approximations of losses that are subject to considerable variability rather than as exact
engineering estimates of losses to individual structures.
The following events were analyzed. The parameters for these scenarios were created using GIS,
HAZUS-MH, and historical information to predict which communities would be at risk.
Using HAZUS-MH
1. 100-year overbank flooding
2. Earthquake
Using GIS
1. Tornado
2. Hazardous Material Release
Page24

4.2 Vulnerability Assessment
4.2.1 Asset Inventory
4.2.1.1 Processes and Sources for Identifying Assets
The HAZUS-MH data is based on best available national data sources. The initial step involved
updating the default HAZUS-MH data using State of Illinois data sources. At Meeting #1, the
planning team members were provided with a plot and report of all HAZUS-MH critical
facilities. The planning team took GIS data provided by SIU-Polis, verified the datasets using
local knowledge, and allowed SIU-Polis to use their local GIS data for additional verification.
SIU-Polis GIS analysts made these updates and corrections to the HAZUS-MH data tables prior
to performing the risk assessment. These changes to the HAZUS-MH inventory allow a level
two analysis. This update process improved the accuracy of the model predictions.
The default HAZUS-MH data has been updated as follows:
The HAZUS-MH defaults, critical facilities, and essential facilities have been updated
based on most recent available data sources. Critical and essential point facilities have
been reviewed, revised, and approved by local subject matter experts at each county.
The essential facility updates (schools, medical care facilities, fire stations, police
stations, and EOCs) have been applied to the HAZUS-MH model data. HAZUS-MH
reports of essential facility losses reflect updated data.
The analysis is restricted to the county boundaries. Events that occur near the county
boundary do not contain damage assessments from the adjacent county.
4.2.1.2 Essential Facilities List

Table 4-7 identifies the critical facilities that were added or updated for the analysis. A complete
list of the critical facilities is included as Appendix F. A map of all the critical facilities is
included as Appendix G.
Table 4-7: Critical Facilities List
Facility
Care Facilities
Number of Facilities
4
Emergency Operation Centers
Fire Stations
Police Stations
Schools
4.2.1.3 Facility Replacement Costs

Default HAZUS-MH building stock data were used for the HAZUS-MH analyses. Facility
replacement costs and total building exposure are identified in Table 4-8. Table 4-8 also includes
the estimated numbers of buildings within each occupancy class.
Page25

Table 4-8: Building Exposure (default HAZUS-MH) for Bond County
General Occupancy
Estimated Total Buildings
Total Building Exposure

(X 1000)
Agricultural
125
$18,418
Commercial
346
$138,841
Education
$13,926
Government
19
$7,619
Industrial
81
$35,444
Religious/Non-Profit
31
$23,618
Residential
9,073
$828,263
Total
9,684
$1,066,129
4.3 Future Development

Bond County is subject to a variety of natural disasters. County government, in partnership with
State government, must make a commitment to prepare for those types of disasters. Likewise, the
Bond County manufacturing base leaves the county vulnerable to major hazardous materials
events and other technological threats. However, as the county-elected and appointed officials
become better informed on the subject of community hazards, they will be better able to set and
direct policies that will enable emergency management and county response agencies to
effectively plan, train, and exercise. The end result will be a stronger community and a better
place in which to work, live, and grow.
4.4 Hazard Profiles

4.4.1 Tornado Hazard
Hazard Definition for Tornado Hazard
Tornadoes pose a great risk to the State of Illinois and its citizens. Tornadoes historically have
occurred during any month of the year. The unpredictability of tornadoes makes them one of
Illinois most dangerous hazards. Their extreme winds are violently destructive when they touch
down in the regions developed and populated areas. Current estimates place the maximum
velocity at about 300 mph, but higher and lower values can occur. A wind velocity of 200 mph
will result in a wind pressure of 102.4 pounds per square foot of surface area, a load that exceeds
the tolerance limits of most buildings. Considering these factors, it is easy to understand why
tornadoes can be so devastating for the communities they hit.
Tornadoes are defined as violently-rotating columns of air extending from thunderstorms to the
ground. Funnel clouds are rotating columns of air not in contact with the ground. However, the
violently-rotating column of air can reach the ground very quickly and become a tornado. If the
funnel cloud picks up and blows around debris, it has reached the ground and is a tornado.
Page26

Tornadoes are classified according to the Fujita tornado intensity scale. The tornado scale ranges
from low intensity F0, with effective wind speeds of 40 to 70 mph, to F5 tornadoes with
effective wind speeds of over 260 mph. The Fujita intensity scale is included in Table 4-9.
Table 4-9: Fujita Tornado Rating
Estimated
Wind Speed
Path
Width
Path
Length
0 (Gale)
4072 mph
617 yards
0.30.9
miles
Light damage, some damage to chimneys, branches

broken, sign boards damaged, shallow-rooted trees blown
over.
1 (Moderate)
73112 mph
1855
yards
1.03.1
miles
Moderate damage, roof surfaces peeled off, mobile homes

pushed off foundations, attached garages damaged.
2 (Significant)
113157 mph
56175
yards
3.29.9
miles
Considerable damage, entire roofs torn from frame houses,

mobile homes demolished, boxcars pushed over, large trees
snapped or uprooted.
3 (Severe)
158206 mph
176566
yards
1031
miles
Severe damage, walls torn from well-constructed houses,

trains overturned, most trees in forests uprooted, heavy cars
thrown about.
4 (Devastating)
207260 mph
0.30.9
miles
3299
miles
Complete damage, well-constructed houses leveled,

structures with weak foundations blown off for some
distance, large missiles generated.
5 (Incredible)
261318 mph
1.03.1
miles
100315
miles
Fujita Number
Description of Destruction
Foundations swept clean, automobiles become missiles and

thrown for 100 yards or more, steel-reinforced concrete
structures badly damaged.
Previous Occurrences for Tornado Hazard

There have been several occurrences of tornadoes within Bond County during recent decades.
The NCDC database reported 16 tornadoes/funnel clouds in Bond County since 1950. These
tornados have been attributed with two deaths, thirty injuries and $5.5 million dollars in property
damage within Bond and adjacent counties. As of April 2008, the most recent tornado
touchdown occurred on May 24, 2006. Two tornados formed over Bond County. The first
tornado touched down 5 miles north of Greenville, southwest of the intersection of Red Ball
Trail and Hastings Cemetery Avenue just north of Peach Avenue. It blew down several large
trees. Three of the trees fell onto a home causing extensive damage. As it traveled to the east it
destroyed a machine shed before lifting and dissipating. The second tornado touched down 1.4
miles northwest of Woburn along Hastings Cemetery Avenue. The tornado caused minor roof
damage to one home. Otherwise, most of the damage was to trees before it lifted and dissipated.
No injuries were reported in either tornado. Bond County tornadoes recorded in the NCDC
database are identified in Table 4-10. Additional details for NCDC events are included in
Appendix D.
Page27

Table 4-10: Bond County Tornadoes*
Location
Date
Type
Magnitude
Deaths
Injuries
Property Damage
Bond
Bond
Bond
Pocahontas
Sorento
Greenville
Old Ripley
Greenville
Greenville
Greenville
Greenville
Greenville
Greenville
Greenville
Greenville
Woburn
12/2/1950
11/9/1984
5/12/1990
6/12/1998
6/14/1998
5/12/2000
5/12/2000
5/1/2002
5/1/2002
5/1/2002
5/1/2002
5/1/2002
5/1/2002
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
5/24/2006
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
F3
F2
F1
F1
F1
F2
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F0
F0
F0
F0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.5M
2.5M
250K
0
0
0
200K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Source: NCDC
* NCDC records are estimates of damage compiled by the National Weather Service from
various local, state, and federal sources. However, these estimates are often preliminary in nature
and may not match the final assessment of economic and property losses related to a given
weather event.
Geographic Location for Tornado Hazard
The entire county has the same risk for occurrence of tornadoes. They can occur at any location
within the county.
Hazard Extent for Tornado Hazard
The historical tornadoes listed previously generally move from west to east across the county
although many other tracks are possiblefrom more southerly to northerly. The extent of the
hazard varies both in terms of the extent of the path and the wind speed.
Calculated Risk Priority Index for Tornado Hazard

Based on historical information, the probability of future tornadoes in Bond County is likely.
Tornadoes with varying magnitudes are expected to happen. According to the Bond County
planning teams assessment the risk priority index (RPI) assessment, tornadoes ranked as the
number two hazard.
Page28
RPI = Probability x Magnitude/Severity.

Probability
Magnitude
/Severity
4
RPI
12
Vulnerability Analysis for Tornado Hazard

Tornadoes can occur within any area of the county; therefore, the entire county population and
all buildings are vulnerable to tornadoes. To accommodate this risk, this plan will consider all
buildings located within the county as vulnerable. The existing buildings and infrastructure in
Bond County are discussed in types and numbers in Table 4-9.
Critical Facilities
All critical facilities are vulnerable to tornadoes. A critical facility will encounter many of the
same impacts as any other building within the jurisdiction. These impacts will vary based on the
magnitude of the tornado, but can include structural failure, debris (trees or limbs) causing
damage, roofs blown off or windows broken by hail or high winds, and loss of facility
functionality (e.g. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community).
Table 4-7 lists the types and numbers of all of the essential facilities in the area. Critical facility
information, including replacement costs, is included in Appendix F. A map of the critical
facilities is included in Appendix G.
Building Inventory
A table of the building exposure for the entire county is listed in Table 4-8. The buildings within
the county can all expect the same impacts, similar to those discussed for critical facilities. These
impacts include structural failure, debris (trees or limbs) causing damage, roofs blown off or
windows broken by hail or high winds, and loss of building function (e.g. a damaged home will
no longer be habitable causing residents to seek shelter).
Infrastructure
During a tornado the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways, utility
lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since the countys entire infrastructure is equally vulnerable,
it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged during a
tornado. The impacts to these items include broken, failed or impassable roadways, broken or
failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community), and railway failure from broken or
impassable railways. Bridges could fail or become impassable causing risk to traffic.
An example scenario is described as follows to illustrate the anticipated impacts of tornadoes in
the county in terms of numbers and types of buildings and infrastructure.
Page29

Bond County Tornado Analysis
GIS overlay modeling was used to determine the potential impacts of an F4 tornado. The
analysis used a hypothetical path for an F4 tornado event that ran approximate 20 miles
southwest to northeast across the county paralleling Interstate 70 and US 40. The selected widths
were based on a recreation of the Fujita-Scale guidelines based on conceptual wind speeds, path
widths, and path lengths. There is no guarantee that every tornado will fit exactly into one of
these six categories. The Fujita Scale guidelines are described in Table 4-11.
Table 4-11: Tornado Path Widths and Damage Curves
Fujita Scale
Path Width (feet)
F-5
F-4
F-3
F-2
F-1
F-0
3000
2400
1800
1200
600
300
Maximum Expected
Damage
100%
100%
80%
50%
10%
0%
Within any given tornado path there are degrees of damage. The most intense damage occurs
within the center of the damage path with a decreasing amount of damage away from the center
of the damage path. This natural process was modeled in GIS by adding damage zones around
the tornado path. Figures 4-1 and Table 4-12 describe the zone analysis.
Figure 4-1: GIS Analysis Using Tornado Buffers
Once the hypothetical route is digitized on the map, several buffers are created to model the
damage functions within each zone.
Page30

An F4 tornado has four damage zones. Total devastation is estimated within 150 feet of the
tornado path (the darker colored zone 1). The outer buffer is 900 feet from the tornado path (the
lightest colored zone 4), within which 10% of the buildings will be damaged.
Table 4-12: Tornado Zones and Damage Curves
Fujita Scale
F-4
F-4
F-4
F-4
Zone
4
3
2
1
Buffer (feet)
600-900
300-600
150-300
0-150
Damage Curve
10%
50%
80%
100%
The selected hypothetical tornado path is depicted in Figure 4-2, and the damage curve buffers
with damaged buildings are shown in Figure 4-3.
Figure 4-2: Hypothetical F-4 Tornado Path in Bond County
Page31

Figure 4-3: Modeled F-4 Tornado Damage Buffers in Greenville, Mulberry Grove, and Pocahontas
The results of the analysis are depicted in Table 4-13. The estimated building losses were $135.1
million. The building losses are an estimate of building replacement costs multiplied by the
percentages of damage. HAZUS-MH default data was used to determine the estimated loss
amounts.
Table 4-13: Estimated Building Losses x $1,000 by Occupancy Type

Occupancy
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Residential
$ 35,458
$ 26,771
$ 30,033
$ 4,313
Commercial
$ 3,056
$2,416
$ 3,871
$ 1,230
Industrial
$ 1,844
$ 1,827
$ 1,177
$ 391
Agriculture
$ 71
$ 85
$ 135
$ 28
Exempt
$ 3,853
$ 2,183
$ 4,383
$ 769
Total
$ 48,135
$ 35,466
$ 43,980
$7,500
Page32

Essential Facilities Damage
There are five essential facilities located within 900 feet of the hypothetical tornado path. The
model predicts the county emergency operations center, two police stations, and two schools
would experience damage. The affected facilities are identified in Table 4-14, and their
geographic locations are shown in Figure 4-3.
Table 4-14: Estimated Essential Facilities Affected
Name
Greenville Civil Defense Center

Bond County Sheriff
Greenville Police Department
Mulberry Grove Elementary School
Mulberry Grove Jr. and Sr. High School
Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Tornado Hazard

The entire population and buildings have been identified as at risk because tornadoes can occur
anywhere within the State of Illinois, at any time of the day, and during any month of the year.
Furthermore, any future development in terms of new construction within the county will be at
risk. The building exposure for Bond County is included in Table 4-8.
All critical facilities in the county and its communities are at risk. Critical facility information,
including replacement costs, is included in Appendix F. A map of the critical facilities is
included in Appendix G.
Analysis of Community Development Trends
Preparing for severe storms will be enhanced if officials sponsor a wide range of programs and
initiatives to address the overall safety of county residents. New structures should be built with
sturdier construction, and existing structures should be hardened to lessen the potential impacts
of severe weather. Community sirens to warn of approaching storms are also vital to ensuring the
safety of Bond County residents.
Page33

4.4.2 Flood Hazard
Hazard Definition for Flooding
Flooding is a significant natural hazard throughout the United States. The type, magnitude, and
severity of flooding are functions of the amount and distribution of precipitation over a given
area, the rate at which precipitation infiltrates into the ground, the geometry and hydrology of the
catchment, and flow dynamics and conditions in and along the river channel. Floods can be
classified as one of two types: upstream floods or downstream floods. Both types of floods are
common in Illinois. Upstream floods, also called flash floods, occur in the upper parts of
drainage basins and are generally characterized by periods of intense rainfall over a short
duration. These floods arise with very little warning and often result in locally intense damage,
and sometimes loss of life, due to the high energy of the flowing water. Flood waters can snap
trees, topple buildings, and easily move large boulders or other structures. Six inches of rushing
water can upend a person; another eighteen inches might carry off a car. Generally, upstream
floods cause damage over relatively localized areas, but they can be quite severe in the local
areas where they occur. Urban flooding is a type of upstream flood. Urban flooding involves the
overflow of storm drain systems and can be the result of inadequate drainage combined with
heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt. Upstream or flash floods can occur at anytime of the year in
Illinois, but they are most common in the spring and summer months.
Downstream floods, sometimes called riverine floods, refer to floods on large rivers at locations
with large upstream catchments. Downstream floods are typically associated with precipitation
events that are of relatively long duration and occur over large areas. Flooding on small tributary
streams may be limited, but the contribution of increased runoff may result in a large flood
downstream. The lag time between precipitation and time of the flood peak is much longer for
downstream floods than for upstream floods, generally providing ample warning for people to
move to safe locations and, to some extent, secure some property against damage. Riverine
flooding on the large rivers of Illinois generally occurs during either the spring or summer.
Hazard Definition for Dam and Levee Failure
Dams are structures that retain or detain water behind a large barrier. When fully or partially full,
the difference in elevation between the water above the dam and below creates large amounts of
potential energy, creating the potential for failure. The same potential exists for levees when they
serve their purpose, which is to confine flood waters within the channel area of a river and
exclude that water from land or communities land-ward of the levee. Dams and levees can fail
due to either: 1) water heights or flows above the capacity for which the structure was designed;
or 2) deficiencies in the structure such that it cannot hold back the potential energy of the water.
If a dam or levee fails, issues of primary concern include loss of human life/injury, downstream
property damage, lifeline disruption (of concern would be transportation routes and utility lines
required to maintain or protect life), and environmental damage.
Many communities view both dams and levees as permanent and infinitely safe structures. This
sense of security may well be false, leading to significantly increased risks. Both downstream of
dams and on floodplains protected by levees, security leads to new construction, added
infrastructure, and increased population over time. Levees in particular are built to hold back
Page34

flood waters only up to some maximum level, often the 100-year (1% annual probability) flood
event. When that maximum is exceeded by more than the design safety margin, then the levee
will be overtopped or otherwise fail, inundating communities in the land previously protected by
that levee. It has been suggested that climate change, land-use shifts, and some forms of river
engineering may be increasing the magnitude of large floods and the frequency of levee-failure
situations.
In addition to failure that results from extreme floods above the design capacity, levees and dams
can fail due to structural deficiencies. Both dams and levees require constant monitoring and
regular maintenance to assure their integrity. Many structures across the U.S. have been underfunded or otherwise neglected, leading to an eventual day of reckoning in the form either of
realization that the structure is unsafe or, sometimes, an actual failure. The threat of dam or levee
failure may require substantial commitment of time, personnel, and resources. Since dams and
levees deteriorate with age, minor issues become larger compounding problems, and the risk of
failure increases.
Previous Occurrences for Riverine and Flash Flooding
The NCDC database reported six flood events in Bond County since 1995. These flood events
have been attributed with $6,000 in property damage. A recent example of flooding in Bond
County occurred in May of 2004 when two consecutive days of 2 to 3 inches of rain caused
flooding across much of the County. Flooding was reported on roads in and around Livingston,
along routes 16 and 127 near Litchfield and Hillsboro, and on roads near Vandalia, Greenville,
and Gillespie.
Significant Bond County floods recorded by the NCDC are shown in Table 4-15. A complete list
of flood events and additional information about the significant flood events are included in
Appendix D. Historical flood crests and discharges at hydrologic monitoring stations are
summarized in Appendix H.
Table 4-15: Bond County Previous Occurrences of Flooding*
Location
Date
Type
Deaths
Injuries
Property
Damage
Greenville
Bond
Greenville
Bond
Bond
Bond
Greenville
11/14/1993
5/17/1995
7/6/1999
5/12/2002
6/10/2002
5/27/2004
5/24/2006
Flooding
Flooding
Flooding
Flooding
Flooding
Flooding
Flooding
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5K
1K
0
0
0
0
0
Source: NCDC
weather event.
Page35

Previous Occurrences for Dam and Levee Dam Failure
There are no records or local knowledge of any dam or any other certified levee failure in the
county.
Repetitive Loss Properties
FEMA defines a repetitive loss structure as a structure covered by a contract of flood insurance
issued under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which has suffered flood loss
damage on two or more occasions during a 10-year period that ends on the date of the second
loss, in which the cost to repair the flood damage is 25% of the market value of the structure at
the time of each flood loss.
Illinois Emergency Management was contacted to determine the location of repetitive loss
structures in Clinton County. Records show that there are no repetitive loss structures within the
county.
Geographic Location for Flooding
Most riverine floods in Illinois occur during either the spring or summer and are the result of
excessive rainfall and/or the combination of rainfall and snowmelt. Flash flooding in Illinois can
occur during anytime of the year, but tends to be less frequent and more localized between midsummer and early winter.
The primary sources of river flooding in Bond County are Shoal Creek, the East Fork of Shoal
Creek, Beaver Creek and Owl Creek. Shoal Creek can inundate portions of Panama and a
significant portion of the unincorporated County. Portions of the city of Greenville can be
inundated by Beaver Creek and the East Fork of Shoal Creek. Owl creek can inundate portions
of Mulberry Grove. Major transportation routes which can be impacted by these creeks include
US 40 and State Routes 127, 140, and 143.
Flash flooding in Bond County typically occurs or is best documented in urban/developed areas.
For example on June 10, 2002 three inches of rain fell in about one hour causing flash flooding
in the city of Greenville. Numerous roads in Greenville were impassable.
A digitized FIRM was used to identify specific stream reaches for analysis. The areas of riverine
flooding are depicted on the map in Appendix E.
Geographic Location for Dam and Levee Failure

The National Inventory of Dams identified ten dams in Bond County. The map in Appendix G
illustrates the location of Bond County dams. Table 4-16 summarizes the National Inventory of
Dams information.
Page36

Table 4-16: National Inventory of Dams
Name
River
Hazard
EAP
Sorento Reservoir Dam
Tributary to Shoal Creek
Greenville New City Dam
Kingsbury Branch Shoal Creek
Bond Christian Camp Lake Dam
Greenville Old City Lake
Tributary to Hurricane Creek

Tributary to Eat Branch of Shoal
Creek
East Fork Shoal Creek
Greenville Road and Gun Club Lake Dam
Stone Pond Dam
Tributary to Hurricane Creek
Armstrong Pond Dam
Tributary to Avery Branch
Rinderer Pond Dam #1
W. Tributary to Little Shoal Creek
Potthast Pond Dam #1
West Tributary to Shoal Creek
Brown Pond Dam #1
West Tributary to Shoal Creek
Coleman-Panama Pond
Tributary to Bear Creek
Hazard Extent for Flooding

The HAZUS-MH flood model is designed to use a flood depth grid and flood boundary polygon
from the digitize FIRM. HAZUS-MH was used to model the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The
BFE is defined as the area that has a 1% chance of flooding in any given year. Planning team
input and a review of historical information provided additional information on specific flood
events.
Hazard Extent for Dam and Levee Failure
Dams assigned the low (L) hazard potential classification are those where failure or misoperation results in no probable loss of human life and low economic and/or environmental
losses. Losses are principally limited to the owners property. Dams assigned the significant (S)
hazard classification are those dams where failure or mis-operation results in no probable loss of
human life but can cause economic loss, environment damage, disruption of lifeline facilities, or
impact other concerns. Dams classified as significant hazard potential dams are often located in
predominantly rural or agricultural areas, but could be located in populated areas with a
significant amount of infrastructure. Dams assigned the high (H) hazard potential classification
are those dams where failure or mis-operation has the highest risk to cause loss of human life and
significant damage to buildings and infrastructure.
According to the IDNR and the National Inventory of Dams, none of dams in Bond County are
classified as a high hazard dams. Nor do any of these dams have an Emergency Action Plan
(EAP; Table 4-18). An EAP is not required by the State of Illinois but is recommended by the
Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
Accurate mapping of the risks of flooding behind levees depends on knowing the condition and
level of protection the levees actually provide. FEMA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are
working together to make sure that flood hazard maps better reflect the flood protection
capabilities of levees and that the maps accurately represent the flood risks posed to areas
situated behind them. Levee ownersusually states, communities, or private individuals or
Page37

organizations such as local levee districtsare responsible for ensuring that the levees they own
are maintained to their original design level and condition. In order to be considered creditable
flood protection structures on FEMA's flood maps, levee owners must provide documentation to
prove that the levee meets design, operation, and maintenance standards for protection against
the 1% annual probability (100-year) flood.
Calculated Risk Priority Index for Flooding
Based on historical information and the HAZUS-MH flooding analysis results, the probability of
flooding in Bond County is possible. According to the Bond County planning teams RPI,
flooding ranked as the number six hazard.
Probability
Magnitude
/Severity
1
RPI
Calculated Risk Priority Index for Dam and Levee Failure

Based on operation and maintenance requirements and local knowledge of the dams in Bond
County, the probability of failure is unlikely. However, if a high hazard dam were to fail, the
magnitude and severity of the damage could be great. The warning time and duration of the dam
failure event would be very short. According to the Bond County planning teams RPI, dam and
levee failure ranked as the number eight hazard.
Probability
Magnitude
/Severity
1
RPI
Vulnerability Analysis for Flooding (HAZUS-MH Analysis Using 100-Year Flood

Boundary and Default General Building Stock)
HAZUS-MH generated the flood depth grid for a 100-year return period and made calculations
by clipping the USGS one-arc-second DEM (~30 m) to the flood boundary. Next, HAZUS-MH
estimated the damages for Bond County by utilizing default aggregate General Building Stock
data.
General Building Stock
Table 4-17 lists the building replacement costs for the facilities identified in the flood areas.
These buildings can expect impacts similar to those discussed for the critical facilities. These
include structural failure, extensive water damage to the facility, and loss of facility functionality
(i.e. residential buildings may no longer be able to provide shelter to their inhabitants).
Page38

Table 4-17: Bond County HAZUS-MH Analysis Total Economic Loss
(100-Year Flood)
General
Occupancy
Agricultural
Commercial
Education
Government
Industrial
Religious/NonP
fit
Residential
Total
Building Loss
(X 1000)
$450
$1,000
0
0
$230
0
$9,960
$11,640
Total Economic
Loss
(X 1000)
$1,620
$3,530
0
0
$790
0
$15,000
$20,940
Figure 4-4 depicts the flood boundary from the HAZUS-MH analysis. HAZUS-MH estimates
the 100-year flood would cause $11.6 million in building losses and $21.0 million in economic
losses.
Figure 4-4: Bond County HAZUS-MH Analysis (100-Year Flood)
Page39

HAZUS-MH estimates 3 census blocks affected by the modeled flood event, with losses
exceeding $1 million. The distribution of losses is shown in Figure 4-5.
HAZUS-MH aggregate loss analysis is evenly distributed across a census block. Census blocks
of concern should be reviewed in more detail to determine the actual percentage of facilities that
fall within the flood hazard areas. The aggregate losses reported in this study may be overstated.
Figure 4-5: Bond County Total Economic Loss (100-Year Flood)
Essential Facilities
An essential facility will encounter many of the same impacts as other buildings within the flood
boundary. These impacts can include structural failure, extensive water damage to the facility
and loss of facility functionality (e.g. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the
community). However, flood analysis revealed no critical facilities are located within the 100year floodplain.
Infrastructure
The types of infrastructure that could be impacted by a flood include roadways, utility
lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since an extensive inventory of the infrastructure is not
available for this plan, it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become
damaged in the event of a flood. The impacts to these items include broken, failed, or impassable
Page40

roadways; broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community); or railway
failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges could fail or become impassable, causing a
traffic risk.
Vulnerability Analysis for Flash Flooding
Flash flooding could affect any low lying location within this jurisdiction; therefore, a significant
portion of the countys population and buildings are vulnerable to a flash flood. These structures
can expect the same impacts as discussed in a riverine flood.
Critical facility information, including replacement costs, is included in Appendix F. A map of
the critical facilities is included in Appendix G.
Vulnerability Analysis for Dam and Levee Failure
An EAP is required to assess the effect of dam failure on these communities. In order to be
considered creditable flood protection structures on FEMA's flood maps, levee owners must
provide documentation to prove the levee meets design, operation and maintenance standards for
protection against the 1% annual probability flood.
Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Flooding
Flash flooding could affect any low lying location within this jurisdiction; therefore, a significant
portion of the countys population and buildings are vulnerable to a flash flood. These structures
can expect the same impacts as discussed in a riverine flood.
Currently, the municipality zoning boards review new development for compliance with local
zoning ordinances. The Bond County Flood Manager administers the floodplain for the county.
At this time no construction is planned within the area of the 100-year floodplain. Therefore,
there is no new construction, which will be vulnerable to a 100-year flood.
Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Dam and Levee Failure
Municipal Planning Departments/Commissions review new developments for compliance with
local zoning ordinances.
Areas with recent development within the county may be more vulnerable to drainage issues.
Storm drains and sewer systems are usually most susceptible, which can cause the back-up of
water, sewage, and debris into homes and basements, causing structural and mechanical damage
as well as creating public health hazards and unsanitary conditions. Controlling floodplain
development is the key to reducing flood-related damages.
Page41

4.4.3 Earthquake Hazard
Hazard Definition for Earthquake Hazard
An earthquake is a sudden, rapid shaking of the Earth caused by the breaking and shifting of rock
beneath the Earth's surface. For hundreds of millions of years, plate tectonics has shaped the
Earth as the huge plates that form the Earth's surface move slowly over, under, and past each
other. At their boundaries, the plates typically are locked together and unable to release the
accumulating energy. When this energy grows strong enough, the plate boundary breaks free and
causes the ground to shake. Most earthquakes occur at the boundaries where the plates meet;
however, some earthquakes occur in the middle of plates, as is the case for seismic zones in the
Midwestern United States. The most seismically active area in the Midwest U.S. is the New
Madrid Seismic Zone. Scientists have learned that the New Madrid fault system may not be the
only fault system in the Central U.S. capable of producing damaging earthquakes. The Wabash
Valley fault system in Illinois and Indiana manifests evidence of large earthquakes in its geologic
history, and there may be other, as yet unidentified, faults that could produce strong earthquakes.
Ground shaking from strong earthquakes can collapse buildings and bridges; disrupt gas, electric,
and phone service; and sometimes trigger landslides, avalanches, flash floods, fires, and
destructive ocean waves (tsunamis). Buildings with foundations resting on unconsolidated
materials and other unstable soil, and trailers and homes not tied to their foundations are at risk
because they can be shaken off their mountings during an earthquake. When an earthquake
occurs in a populated area, it may cause deaths, injuries, and extensive property damage.
Magnitude measures the energy released at the source of the earthquake. Magnitude is
determined from measurements on seismographs, and a single earthquake will have a single
magnitude to quantify its strength. Earthquake intensity measures the strength of shaking
produced by the earthquake at a certain location. Intensity is determined from effects on people,
human structures, and the natural environment, and a single earthquake will have a wide range of
intensity values at different locations around the epicenter. Table 4-18 is a description of
earthquake intensity using an abbreviated Modified Mercalli Intensity scale, and Table 4-19 lists
earthquake magnitudes and their corresponding intensities.
(Source: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/topics/mag_vs_int.php)
Table 4-18: Abbreviated Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale
Mercalli
Intensity
Description
Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions.
II
Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings.
III
IV
V
Felt quite noticeably by persons indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings. Many
people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing motor cars may rock slightly.
Vibrations similar to the passing of a truck. Duration estimated.
Felt indoors by many, outdoors by few during the day. At night, some awakened. Dishes,
windows, doors disturbed; walls make cracking sound. Sensation like heavy truck striking
building. Standing motor cars rocked noticeably.
Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some dishes, windows broken. Unstable
objects overturned. Pendulum clocks may stop.
Page42

Mercalli
Intensity
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Description
Felt by all, many frightened. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen
plaster. Damage slight.
Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in wellbuilt ordinary structures; considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures;
some chimneys broken.
Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable damage in ordinary
substantial buildings with partial collapse. Damage great in poorly built structures. Fall of
chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls. Heavy furniture overturned.
Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures
thrown out of plumb. Damage great in substantial buildings, with partial collapse. Buildings
shifted off foundations.
Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures
destroyed with foundations. Rails bent.
XI
Few, if any (masonry) structures remain standing. Bridges destroyed. Rails bent greatly.
XII
Damage total. Lines of sight and level are distorted. Objects thrown into the air.
Table 4-19: Earthquake Magnitude vs. Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale
Earthquake Magnitude
1.0 - 3.0
3.0 - 3.9
4.0 - 4.9
5.0 - 5.9
6.0 - 6.9
7.0 and higher
Typical Maximum Modified Mercalli Intensity

I
II - III
IV - V
VI - VII
VII - IX
VIII or higher
Historical Earthquakes that have Affected Bond County

Numerous instrumentally measured earthquakes have occurred in Illinois. In the past few
decades, with many precise seismographs positioned across Illinois, measured earthquakes have
varied in magnitude from very low microseismic events of M=1-3 to larger events up to M=5.4.
Microseismic events are usually only detectable by seismographs and rarely felt by anyone. The
most recent earthquake in Illinoisas of the date of this reportoccurred on August 30, 2008 at
0:46:00 local time about 2.4 km (1.5 miles) southeast of Gale, IL and measured 2.6 in
magnitude.
The consensus of opinion among seismologists working in the Midwest is that a magnitude 5.0
to 5.5 event could occur virtually anywhere at any time throughout the region. Earthquakes occur
in Illinois all the time, although damaging quakes are very infrequent. Illinois earthquakes
causing minor damage occur on average every 20 years, although the actual timing is extremely
variable. Most recently, a magnitude 5.2 earthquake shook southeastern Illinois on April 18,
2008, causing minor damage in the Mt Carmel, IL area. Earthquakes resulting in more serious
damage have occurred about every 70 to 90 years.
First on the list of historical earthquakes that have affected Illinois and first on the list on
continuing earthquake threats at present and into the future is seismic activity on the New
Madrid Seismic Zone of southeastern Missouri. On December 16, 1811 and January 23 and
February 7 of 1812, three earthquakes struck the central U.S. with magnitudes estimated to be
7.5-8.0. These earthquakes caused violent ground cracking and volcano-like eruptions of
Page43

sediment (sand blows) over an area of >10,500 km2, and uplift of a 50 km by 23 km zone (the
Lake County uplift). The shaking rang church bells in Boston, collapsed scaffolding on the
Capitol in Washington, D.C., and was felt over a total area of over 10 million km2 (the largest
felt area of any historical earthquake). Of all the historical earthquakes that have struck the U.S.,
an 1811-style event would do the most damage if it recurred today.
The New Madrid earthquakes are especially noteworthy because the seismic zone is in the center
of the North American Plate. Such intraplate earthquakes are felt, and do damage, over much
broader areas than comparable earthquakes at plate boundaries. The precise driving force
responsible for activity on the New Madrid seismic zone is not known, but most scientists infer
that it is compression transmitted across the North American Plate. That compression is focused
on New Madrid because it is the site of a Paleozoic structurethe Reelfoot Riftwhich is a
zone of weakness in the crust.
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the Center for Earthquake Research and
Information (CERI) at the University of Memphis estimate the probability of a repeat of the
18111812 type earthquakes (magnitude 7.58.0) is 7%10% over the next 50 years (USGS Fact
Sheet 2006-3125.) Frequent large earthquakes on the New Madrid seismic zone are geologically
puzzling because the region shows relatively little deformation. Three explanations have been
proposed: 1) recent seismological and geodetic activity is still a short-term response to the 1811
12 earthquakes; 2) activity is irregular or cyclic; or 3) activity began only in the recent geologic
past. There is some dispute over how often earthquakes like the 181112 sequence occur. Many
researchers estimate a recurrence interval of between 550 and 1100 years; other researchers
suggest that either the magnitude of the 181112 earthquakes have been over-stated, or else the
actual frequency of these events is less. It is fair to say, however, that even if the 181112 shocks
were just magnitude ~7 events, they nonetheless caused widespread damage and would do the
same if another such earthquake or earthquake sequence were to strike today.
[Above: New Madrid earthquakes and seismic zone modified from N. Pinter, 1993, Exercises in
Active Tectonic history adapted from Earthquake Information Bulletin, 4(3), May-June 1972.
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/states/illinois/history.php]
The earliest reported earthquake in Illinois was in 1795. This event was felt at Kaskaskia, IL for
a minute and a half and was also felt in Kentucky. At Kaskaskia, subterranean noises were heard.
Due to the sparse frontier population, an accurate location is not possible, and the shock may
have actually originated outside the state.
An intensity VI-VII earthquake occurred on April 12, 1883, awakening several people in Cairo,
IL. One old frame house was significantly damaged, resulting in minor injuries to the
inhabitants. This is the only record of injury in the state due to earthquakes.
On October 31, 1895 a large M6.8 occurred at Charleston, Missouri, just south of Cairo. Strong
shaking caused eruptions of sand and water at many places along a line roughly 30 km (20 mi)
long. Damage occurred in six states, but most severely at Charleston, with cracked walls,
windows shattered, broken plaster, and chimneys fallen. Shaking was felt in 23 states from
Washington, D.C. to Kansas and from southernmost Canada to New Orleans, LA.
Page44

A Missouri earthquake on November 4, 1905, cracked walls in Cairo. Aftershocks were felt over
an area of 100,000 square miles in nine states. In Illinois, it cracked the wall of the new
education building in Cairo and a wall at Carbondale, IL.
Among the largest earthquakes occurring in Illinois was the May 26, 1909 shock, which knocked
over many chimneys at Aurora. It was felt over 500,000 square miles and strongly felt in Iowa
and Wisconsin. Buildings swayed in Chicago where there was fear that the walls would collapse.
Just under two months later, a second Intensity VII earthquake occurred on July 18, 1909,
damaged chimneys in Petersburg, IL, Hannibal, MO, and Davenport, IA. Over twenty windows
were broken, bricks loosened and plaster cracked in the Petersburg area. This event was felt over
40,000 square miles.
On November 7, 1958, a shock along the Indiana border resulted in damage at Bartelso, Dale
and Maunie, IL. Plaster cracked and fell, and a basement wall and floor were cracked.
On August 14, 1965, a sharp but local shock occurred at Tamms, IL, a town of about 600
people. The magnitude 5 quake damaged chimneys, cracked walls, knocked groceries from the
shelves, and muddied the water supply. Thunderous earth noises were heard. This earthquake
was only felt within a 10 mile radius of Tamms, in communities such as Elco, Unity, Olive
Branch, and Olmstead, IL. Six aftershocks were felt.
An earthquake of Intensity VII occurred on November 9, 1968. This magnitude 5.3 shock was
felt over an area of 580,000 square miles in 23 states. There were reports of people in tall
buildings in Ontario and Boston feeling the shock. Damage consisted of bricks being knocked
from chimneys, broken windows, toppled television antenna, and cracked plaster. There were
scattered reports of cracked foundations, fallen parapets, and overturned tombstones. Chimney
damage was limited to buildings 30 to 50 years old. Many people were frightened. Church bells
rang at Broughton and several other towns. Loud rumbling earthquake noise was reported in
many communities.
Dozens of other shocks originating in Missouri, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee,
Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Canada have been felt in Illinois without causing
damage. There have been three earthquakes slightly greater than magnitude 5.0 and Intensity
level VII which occurred in 1968, 1987 and 2008 and that were widely felt throughout southern
Illinois and the midcontinent.
Above text adapted from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/states/illinois/history.php and from
Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989 (Revised), C.W. Stover and J.L. Coffman, U.S. Geological
Survey Professional Paper 1527, United States Government Printing Office, Washington: 1993.
Geographic Location for Earthquake Hazard

Bond County occupies a region susceptible to earthquakes. Regionally, the two most significant
zones of seismic activity are the New Madrid Seismic Zone and the Wabash Valley Fault
System. The epicenters of three small earthquakes (M1.84.3) have been recorded in Bond
County (Figure 4-12). The geologic mechanism related to the minor earthquakes is poorly
understood. Return periods for large earthquakes within the New Madrid System are estimated to
Page45

be ~5001000 years; moderate quakes between magnitude 5.5 and 6.0 can recur within
approximately 150 years or less. The Wabash Valley Fault System extends nearly the entire
length of southern Illinois and has the potential to generate an earthquake of sufficient strength to
cause damage between St. Louis, MO and Indianapolis, IN. The USGS and the Center for
Earthquake Research and Information estimate the probability of a repeat of the 18111812 type
earthquakes (magnitude 7.58.0) at 7%10% and the probability of a magnitude 6.0 or larger at
25%40% within the next 50 years.
Figure 4-6 depicts the following: a) Location of notable earthquakes in the Illinois region with
inset of Bond County; b) Generalized geologic bedrock map with earthquake epicenters,
geologic structures, and inset of Bond County; c) Geologic and earthquake epicenter map of
Bond County.
Page46

Figure 4-6 a, b, c: Bond County Earthquakes
Page47

Hazard Extent for Earthquake Hazard
The extent of the earthquake is countywide.
Calculated Risk Priority Index for Earthquake Hazard
Based on historical information as well as current USGS and SIU research and studies, future
earthquakes in Bond County are possible. According to the Bond County planning teams RPI
assessment, earthquake is ranked as the number five hazard.
Probability
Magnitude
/Severity
4
RPI
Vulnerability Analysis for Earthquake Hazard

This hazard could impact the entire jurisdiction equally; therefore, the entire countys population
and all buildings are vulnerable to an earthquake and can expect the same impacts within the
affected area. To accommodate this risk this plan will consider all buildings located within the
county as vulnerable.
Critical Facilities
All critical facilities are vulnerable to earthquakes. A critical facility would encounter many of
the same impacts as any other building within the county. These impacts include structural
failure and loss of facility functionality (e.g. damaged police station will no longer be able to
serve the community). A complete list of all of the critical facilities, including replacement costs,
is included in Appendix F. A map of the critical facilities is included in Appendix G.
Building Inventory
Table 4-8 shows building exposure for the entire county. The buildings within the county can all
expect the same impacts, similar to those discussed for critical facilities. These impacts include
structural failure and loss of building function, which could result in indirect impacts (e.g.
damaged homes will no longer be habitable, causing residence to seek shelter).
Infrastructure
During an earthquake, the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways, utility
lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since a full inventory of infrastructure is not available for this
plan, it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged in the
event of an earthquake. The impacts to these items include broken, failed, or impassable
roadways, broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community), and railway
failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges could fail or become impassable causing
Page48

risk to traffic. Typical scenarios are described to gauge the anticipated impacts of earthquakes in
the county in terms of number and types of buildings and infrastructure.
The SIU-Polis team reviewed existing geological information and recommendations for
earthquake scenarios. Three earthquake scenariostwo based on USGS modeled scenarios and
one based on deterministic scenarios were developed to provide a reasonable basis for
earthquake planning in Bond County. The two USGS analyses were a M7.7 event on the New
Madrid fault zone and M7.1 earthquake on the Wabash Valley Seismic Zone. Shake maps
provided by FEMA were used in HAZUS-MH to estimate losses for Bond County based on
these events. The final scenario was a Moment Magnitude of 5.5 with the epicenter located in
Bond County. Note that a deterministic scenario, in this context, refers to hazard or risk models
based on specific scenarios without explicit consideration of the probability of their occurrences.
This scenario was selected based upon a rupture of a local unnamed fault located just south of
Greenville near the intersection of Interstate 70 and State Route 127 that presents a realistic
earthquake scenario for planning purposes.
Modeling a deterministic scenario requires user input for a variety of parameters. One of the
most critical sources of information that is required for accurate assessment of earthquake risk is
soils data. Illinois Geologic Survey provided a NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction
Program) soil classification map for southern Illinois (Bauer and Su, 2007). NEHRP soil
classifications portray the degree of shear-wave amplification that can occur during ground
shaking.
Earthquake hypocenter depths in southern Illinois range from less than 1.0 to ~25.0 km. The
average hypocenter depth, ~10.0 km, was used for the deterministic earthquake scenario. For this
scenario type HAZUS-MH also requires the user to define an attenuation function. To maintain
consistency with the USGSs (2006) modeling of strong ground motion in the central United
States, the Toro et al. (1997) attenuation function was used for the deterministic earthquake
scenario.
The building losses are subdivided into two categories: direct building losses and business
interruption losses. The direct building losses are the estimated costs to repair or replace the
damage caused to the building and its contents. The business interruption losses are the losses
associated with inability to operate a business because of the damage sustained during the
earthquake. Business interruption losses also include the temporary living expenses for those
people displaced from their homes because of the earthquake
Results for 7.7 Magnitude New Madrid Earthquake Scenario
The results of the 7.7 New Madrid Earthquake loss modeling are depicted in Table 4-20, Table
4-21, and Figure 4-7. HAZUS-MH estimates that approximately 330 buildings will be at least
moderately damaged.
The total building related losses totaled $16.31 million; 12% of the estimated losses were related
to the business interruption of the region. Large losses were sustained by the residential
occupancies, which comprised more than 58% of the total loss.
Page49
Table 4-20: New Madrid Scenario-Damage Counts by Building Occupancy
Table 4-21: New Madrid Scenario-Building Economic losses in Millions of Dollars
Page50

Figure 4-7: New Madrid Valley Scenario-Building Economic Losses in Thousands of
Dollars
New Madrid Earthquake ScenarioEssential Facility Losses

Before the earthquake, the region had 402 care beds available for use. On the day of the
earthquake, the model estimates that only 23 care beds (6%) are available for use by patients
already in medical care facilities and those injured by the earthquake. After one week, 65% of
the beds will be back in service. By day 30, 89% will be operational.
Results for 7.1 Magnitude Wabash Valley Earthquake Scenario
The results of the 7.1M Wabash Valley Earthquake loss modeling are depicted in Table 4-22,
Table 4-23, and Figure 4-8. HAZUS-MH estimates that 176 building will be at least moderately
damaged.
Page51

Table 4-22: Wabash Valley Scenario-Damage Counts by Building Occupancy
Table 4-23: Wabash Valley Scenario-Building Economic losses in Millions of Dollars
Page52

Figure 4-8: Wabash Valley Scenario-Building Economic Losses in Thousands of Dollars
Wabash Valley ScenarioEssential Facility Losses

earthquake, the model estimates that only 23 care beds (6.0%) are available for use by patients
the beds will be back in service. By day 30, 89% will be operational.
Results for 5.5 Magnitude Earthquake in Bond County
The results of the arbitrary 5.5 magnitude earthquake within Bond County are depicted in Tables
4-24 and 4-25 and Figure 4-9. HAZUS-MH estimates that 1,224 buildings will be at least
moderately damaged. This is more than 19% of the total number of buildings in the region. It is
estimated that 53 buildings will be damaged beyond repair.
Page53
Table 4-24: Bond County 5.5M Scenario-Damage Counts by Building Occupancy
Table 4-25: Bond County 5.5M Scenario-Building Economic Losses

in Millions of Dollars
Page54

Figure 4-9: Bond County 5.5M Scenario-Building Economic Losses in Thousands of Dollars
Arbitrary Earthquake ScenarioEssential Facility Losses

earthquake, the model estimates that only 2 care beds (1.0%) are available for use by patients
the beds will be back in service. By day 30, 62.0% will be operational.
Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Earthquake Hazard
New construction, especially critical facilities, will accommodate earthquake mitigation
design standards.
Community development will occur outside of the low-lying areas in floodplains with a
water table within five feet of grade which are susceptible to liquefaction. Furthermore,
Bond County will continue to provide training to county officials, implement public education,
and institute leaders who are proactive in mapping and studying the risks of earthquakes in the
county.
Page55

4.4.4 Thunderstorm Hazard
Hazard Definition for Thunderstorm Hazard
Severe thunderstorms are defined as thunderstorms with one or more of the following
characteristics: strong winds, large damaging hail, and frequent lightning. Severe thunderstorms
most frequently occur in Illinois in the spring and summer months and in the late afternoon or
evening, but can occur any month of the year at any time of day. A severe thunderstorms
impacts can be localized or can be widespread in nature. A thunderstorm is classified as severe
when it meets one of more of the following criteria:
Hail of diameter 0.75 inches or higher

Frequent and dangerous lightning
Wind speeds equal to or greater than 58 mph
Hail
Hail can be a product of a strong thunderstorm. Hail usually falls near the center of a storm;
however strong winds occurring at high altitudes in the thunderstorm can blow the hailstones
away from the storm center, resulting in a broader distribution. Hailstones range from pea-sized
to baseball-sized, but hailstones larger than softballs have been reported on rare occasions.
Lightning
Lightning is a discharge of electricity from a thunderstorm. Lightning is often perceived as a
minor hazard, but in reality lightning causes damage to many structures and kills or severely
injures numerous people in the United States each year.
Severe Winds (Straight-Line Winds)
Straight-line winds from thunderstorms are a fairly common occurrence across Illinois. Straightline winds can cause damage to homes, businesses, power lines, and agricultural areas and may
require temporary sheltering of individuals who are without power for extended periods of time.
Previous Occurrences for Thunderstorm Hazard
The NCDC database reported 34 hailstorms in Bond County since 1974 which cause $51,000 in
property damage. Hailstorms occur nearly every year in the late spring and early summer
months. The most recent significant occurrence of hail occurred in October 2007 when severe
thunderstorms produced a swath hail ranging from pea up to golf-ball in size crossed Bond
County impacting large portion of the unincorporated County and the City of Greenville.
Bond County hailstorms are listed in Table 4-26; additional details for NCDC events are
included in Appendix D.
Page56

Table 4-26: Bond County Hailstorms*
Location or County
Bond
Bond
Bond
Greenville
Mulberry Grove
Old Ripley
Pocahontas
Greenville
Mulberry Grove
Smithboro
Old Ripley
Beaver Creek
Pocahontas
Mulberry Grove
Greenville
Greenville
Greenville
Woburn
Greenville
Mulberry Grove
Sorento
Greenville
Pierron
Pocahontas
Greenville
Pocahontas
Pocahontas
Mulberry Grove
Greenville
Baden Baden
Smithboro
Pocahontas
Baden Baden
Greenville
Date
Type
Magnitude
Deaths
Injuries
Property
Damage
4/3/1974
8/18/1974
8/20/1979
4/26/1994
4/26/1994
5/3/1996
5/3/1996
5/22/1998
6/12/1998
6/12/1998
6/14/1998
2/27/1999
2/27/1999
6/4/1999
10/24/2001
4/24/2002
5/1/2002
5/1/2002
5/8/2003
3/31/2005
3/31/2005
5/11/2005
5/19/2005
5/19/2005
2/16/2006
2/16/2006
4/2/2006
4/16/2006
4/30/2006
5/24/2006
3/1/2007
4/3/2007
8/24/2007
10/18/2007
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
Hail
0.75 in.
2.00 in.
0.75 in.
1.00 in.
1.75 in.
0.75 in.
1.75 in.
0.75 in.
1.75 in.
1.00 in.
1.75 in.
1.00 in.
1.75 in.
1.00 in.
0.75 in.
1.75 in.
1.75 in.
1.00 in.
0.88 in.
0.75 in.
0.88 in.
0.75 in.
0.88 in.
0.75 in.
1.00 in.
1.00 in.
3.00 in.
0.75 in.
0.75 in.
1.75 in.
1.50 in.
0.75 in.
0.88 in.
1.75 in.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Source: NCDC
weather event.
Page57

The NCDC database identified 85 wind storms reported since 1971. On multiple occasions in the
past 35 years trees have been uprooted by severe winds in Bond County. These storms have been
attributed with $435,000 in property damage in Bond and adjacent counties.
As shown in Table 4-27, wind storms have historically occurred year-round with the greatest
frequency and damage in April through August.
Table 4-27: Bond County Wind Storms*
Location or
County
Date
Type
Magnitude
Deaths
Injuries
Property
Damage
Bond
2/26/1971
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
4/3/1974
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
6/9/1974
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
8/18/1974
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
8/18/1974
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
9/28/1974
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
9/28/1974
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
2/23/1977
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
2/23/1977
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
4/7/1980
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
4/7/1980
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
4/2/1982
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
4/2/1982
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
5/28/1982
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
4/27/1983
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
3/15/1984
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
7/9/1986
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
7/28/1986
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
9/29/1986
Thunderstorm Wind
Bond
5/25/1989
Thunderstorm Wind
57 kts.
N/A
Bond
8/20/1989
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
11/15/1989
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
5/9/1990
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
6/15/1991
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Bond
4/9/1992
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
1K
Bond
7/19/1992
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Pocahontas
9/2/1993
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Page58

Location or
County
Date
Type
Magnitude
Deaths
Injuries
Property
Damage
Pocahontas
4/15/1994
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
1K
Reno
6/23/1994
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
1K
Sorento
6/23/1994
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
5K
Bond
4/18/1995
Wind
N/A
400K
Keyesport
6/8/1995
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
0K
Greenville
5/25/1996
Thunderstorm Wind
50 kts.
Bond
9/26/1996
Wind
45 kts.
140K
Pierron
10/17/1996
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Pocahontas
10/17/1996
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
10/22/1996
Thunderstorm Wind
50 kts.
Bond
4/30/1997
Wind
45 kts.
Smithboro
6/14/1998
Thunderstorm Wind
60 kts.
Greenville
6/29/1998
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
7/22/1998
Thunderstorm Wind
56 kts.
Greenville
11/10/1998
Thunderstorm Wind
56 kts.
Sorento
11/10/1998
Thunderstorm Wind
56 kts.
Greenville
4/8/1999
Thunderstorm Wind
50 kts.
Sorento
4/8/1999
Thunderstorm Wind
60 kts.
Greenville
6/4/1999
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
6/14/2000
Thunderstorm Wind
52 kts.
Greenville
6/14/2000
Thunderstorm Wind
52 kts.
Dudleyville
7/18/2000
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Old Ripley
7/18/2000
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
7/18/2000
Thunderstorm Wind
52 kts.
Old Ripley
7/18/2000
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Bond
3/13/2001
Wind
45 kts.
Greenville
4/10/2001
Thunderstorm Wind
52 kts.
Smithboro
4/10/2001
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
5K
Greenville
7/17/2001
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
5K
Greenville
10/24/2001
Thunderstorm Wind
51 kts.
2K
Bond
3/9/2002
Wind
43 kts.
Pocahontas
5/9/2002
Thunderstorm Wind
61 kts.
Greenville
6/11/2002
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
5/24/2004
Thunderstorm Wind
52 kts.
Page59

Location or
County
Date
Type
Magnitude
Deaths
Injuries
Property
Damage
Sorento
5/24/2004
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Bond
1/5/2005
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Greenville
5/11/2005
Thunderstorm Wind
51 kts.
Mulberry Grove
5/11/2005
Thunderstorm Wind
51 kts.
Greenville
6/13/2005
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
8/13/2005
Thunderstorm Wind
57 kts.
Greenville
11/5/2005
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
2/16/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Pocahontas
4/2/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
4/2/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
4/2/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
60 kts.
Greenville
4/2/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
60 kts.
Mulberry Grove
4/2/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
60 kts.
Tamalco
4/2/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
60 kts.
Greenville
5/24/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Woburn
5/24/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Greenville
6/17/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Mulberry Grove
6/17/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Greenville
6/22/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
52 kts.
Mulberry Grove
6/22/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
55 kts.
Pocahontas
7/18/2006
Thunderstorm Wind
50 kts.
Greenville
6/23/2007
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
10K
Mulberry Grove
8/24/2007
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Greenville
10/18/2007
Thunderstorm Wind
N/A
Source: NCDC
weather event.
Geographic Location for Thunderstorm Hazard
The entire county has the same risk for occurrence of thunderstorms. They can occur at any
location within the county.
Page60

Hazard Extent for Thunderstorm Hazard
The extent of the historical thunderstorms listed previously varies in terms of the extent of the
storm, the wind speed, and the size of hailstones. Thunderstorms can occur at any location within
the county.
Calculated Risk Priority Index for Thunderstorm Hazard
Based on historical information, the probability of future high wind damage is likely. High winds
with widely varying magnitudes are expected to happen. According to the Bond County planning
teams RPI assessment, thunderstorms and high wind damage ranked as the number four hazard.
Probability
Magnitude
/Severity
2
RPI
Vulnerability Analysis for Thunderstorm Hazard

Severe thunderstorms are an evenly distributed threat across the entire jurisdiction; therefore, the
entire countys population and all buildings are susceptible to severe thunderstorms and can
expect the same impacts. This plan will therefore consider all buildings located within the county
as vulnerable. The existing buildings and infrastructure in Bond County are discussed in types
and numbers in Table 4-8.
Critical Facilities
All critical facilities are vulnerable to severe thunderstorms. A critical facility will encounter
many of the same impacts as any other building within the jurisdiction. These impacts include
structural failure, debris (trees or limbs) causing damage, roofs blown off or windows broken by
hail or high winds, fires caused by lightning, and loss of function of the facility (e.g. a damaged
police station will no longer be able to serve the community). Table 4-7 lists the types and
numbers of all essential facilities in the area. Critical facility information, including replacement
costs, is included in Appendix F. A map of the critical facilities is included in Appendix G.
Building Inventory
A table of the building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire county
is provided in Table 4-8. The buildings within the county can all expect the same impacts,
similar to those discussed for critical facilities. These impacts include structural failure, debris
(trees or limbs) causing damage, roofs blown off or windows broken by hail or high winds, fires
caused by lightning, and loss of building functionality (e.g. a damaged home will no longer be
habitable causing residence to seek shelter).
Page61

Infrastructure
During a severe thunderstorm, the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include
roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since the countys entire infrastructure is
equally vulnerable, it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become
damaged during a severe thunderstorm. The impacts to these items include broken, failed or
impassable roadways; broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community); or
railway failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges could fail or become impassable
causing risk to traffic.
Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Thunderstorm Hazard
All future development within the county and all communities will remain vulnerable to these
events.
Preparing for severe storms will be enhanced if officials sponsor a wide range of programs and
initiatives to address the overall safety of county residents. New structures need to be built with
more sturdy construction, and those structures already in place need to be hardened to lessen the
potential impacts of severe weather. Community warning sirens to provide warning of
approaching storms are also vital to preventing the loss of property and ensuring the safety of
Bond County residents.
4.4.5 Winter Storm Hazard
Hazard Definition for Winter Storm Hazard
Severe winter weather consists of various forms of precipitation and strong weather conditions.
This may include one or more of the following conditions: freezing rain, sleet, heavy snow,
blizzards, icy roadways, extreme low temperatures, and strong winds. These conditions can
cause human health risks such as frostbite, hypothermia, and death.
Ice (glazing) and Sleet Storms
Ice or sleet, even in small quantities, can result in hazardous driving conditions and can cause
property damage. Sleet involves frozen raindrops that bounce when they hit the ground or other
objects. Sleet does not stick to trees and wires. Ice storms, on the other hand, involve liquid rain
that falls through subfreezing air and/or onto sub-freezing surfaces, freezing on contact with
those surfaces. The ice coats trees, buildings, overhead wires, and roadways, sometimes causing
extensive damage.
The most damaging winter storms in southern Illinois have been ice storms. Ice storms occur
when moisture-laden gulf air converges with the northern jet stream causing strong winds and
heavy precipitation. This precipitation takes the form of freezing rain coating power and
communication lines and trees with heavy ice. The winds will then cause the overburdened limbs
and cables to snap; leaving large sectors of the population without power, heat, or
Page62

communication. In the past few decades, including the winter of 200708, numerous ice storm
events have occurred in southern Illinois.
Snow Storms
Significant snow storms are characterized by the rapid accumulation of snow, often accompanied
by high winds, cold temperatures, and low visibility. A blizzard is categorized as a snow storm
with winds of 35 miles per hour or greater and/or visibility of less than mile for three or more
hours. Blizzards are the most dramatic and perilous of all winter storm events. Most snow within
a blizzard is in the form of fine, powdery particles, which are wind-blown in such great
quantities that visibility is reduced to only a few feet. Blizzards have the potential to result in
property damage.
Illinois has repeatedly been struck by blizzards, although they are less common in the southern
part of the state. Blizzard conditions can cause power outages, loss of communication, and make
transportation impossible. The blowing of snow can reduce visibility to less than mile,
resulting in disorientation that can make even travel by foot dangerous.
Severe Cold
Severe cold is characterized by the ambient air temperature that may drop to 0F or below. These
extreme temperatures can increase the likelihood of frostbite and hyperthermia. High winds
during severe cold events can enhance the air temperatures effects. Fast winds during cold
weather events can lower the Wind Chill Factor (how cold the air feels on your skin), which can
lower the time it takes for frostbite and hypothermia to affect a persons body.
Previous Occurrences for Winter Storm Hazard
The NCDC database identified 27 winter storm and extreme cold events for Bond County since
1996. These storms have been attributed with one death. A recent example a severe winter storm
occurred in January 2007 an arctic boundary settled south of the area on the 12th and 13th of
January bringing subfreezing temperatures to the northwestern half of the county warning area.
Three rounds of precipitation occurred during this period, with the first being the most
destructive of all. Significant tree and limb damage was reported as a result of this storm,
together with widespread power outages. More than 100,000 homes and businesses lost power
during this storm. Ice accumulations across Southwest Illinois were from 1/4 to 1/2 inch.
The NCDC winter storms for Bond County are listed in Table 4-28. Additional details for NCDC
events are included in Appendix D.
Page63

Table 4-28: Winter Storm Events*
Location or County
Date
Type
Magnitude
Deaths
Injuries
Property
Damage
Bond
11/25/1996
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/8/1997
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/15/1997
Winter
N/A
Bond
4/10/1997
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/12/1998
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/21/1998
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/1/1999
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/13/1999
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/17/2000
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/28/2000
Winter
N/A
Bond
3/11/2000
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/13/2000
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/16/2000
Cold
N/A
Bond
1/26/2001
Winter
N/A
Bond
2/25/2002
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/4/2002
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/24/2002
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/1/2003
Winter
N/A
Bond
2/15/2003
Winter
N/A
Bond
2/23/2003
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/13/2003
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/25/2004
Winter
N/A
Bond
11/29/2006
Winter
N/A
0K
Bond
12/1/2006
Winter
N/A
0K
Bond
1/12/2007
Winter
N/A
0K
Bond
4/4/2007
Cold
N/A
0K
Bond
12/8/2007
Winter
N/A
0K
Bond
11/25/1996
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/8/1997
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/15/1997
Winter
N/A
Bond
4/10/1997
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/12/1998
Winter
N/A
Page64

Location or County
Date
Type
Magnitude
Deaths
Injuries
Property
Damage
Bond
12/21/1998
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/1/1999
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/13/1999
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/17/2000
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/28/2000
Winter
N/A
Bond
3/11/2000
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/13/2000
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/16/2000
Cold
N/A
Bond
1/26/2001
Winter
N/A
Bond
2/25/2002
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/4/2002
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/24/2002
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/1/2003
Winter
N/A
Bond
2/15/2003
Winter
N/A
Bond
2/23/2003
Winter
N/A
Bond
12/13/2003
Winter
N/A
Bond
1/25/2004
Winter
N/A
Bond
11/29/2006
Winter
N/A
0K
Bond
12/1/2006
Winter
N/A
0K
Bond
1/12/2007
Winter
N/A
0K
Source: NCDC
weather event.
Geographic Location for Winter Storm Hazard
Severe winter storms are regional in nature. Most of the NCDC data is calculated regionally or in
some cases statewide.
Hazard Extent for Winter Storm Hazard
The extent of the historical winter storms listed previously varies in terms of storm extent,
temperature, and ice or snowfall. Severe winter storms affect the entire jurisdiction equally.
Calculated Risk Priority Index for Winter Storm Hazard
Page65

Based on historical information, the probability of future winter storms are probable. Winter
storms of varying magnitudes are expected to happen. According to the Bond County planning
teams RPI assessment, winter storms ranked as the number one hazard.
Probability
Magnitude
/Severity
4
RPI
12
Vulnerability Analysis for Winter Storm Hazard

Winter storm impacts are evenly distributed across the jurisdiction; therefore the entire county is
vulnerable to winter storms and can expect the same impacts within the affected area. The
building exposure for Bond County, as determined from the building inventory, is included in
Table 4-8.
Critical Facilities
All critical facilities are vulnerable to a winter storm. A critical facility will encounter many of
the same impacts as any other buildings within the jurisdiction. These impacts include loss of gas
or electricity from broken or damaged utility lines, roads and railways damaged or impassable,
broken water pipes, and roof collapse from heavy snow. Table 4-7 lists the types and numbers of
the essential facilities in the area. Critical facility information, including replacement costs, is
included in Appendix F. A map of the critical facilities is included in Appendix G.
Building Inventory
Table 4-8 lists the building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire
county. The impacts to the building stock within the county are similar to the damages expected
to the critical facilities, including loss of gas of electricity from broken or damaged utility lines,
roads and railways damaged or impassable, broken water pipes, and roof collapse from heavy
snow.
Infrastructure
During a winter storm, the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways,
utility lines/pipes, railroads and bridges. Since the countys entire infrastructure is equally
vulnerable, it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged
during a winter storm. Potential impacts include broken gas and/or electricity lines, or damaged
utility lines, damaged or impassable roads and railways, and broken water pipes.
Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Winter Storm Hazard

Any new development within the county will remain vulnerable to these events.
Page66

Because the winter storm events are regional in nature, future development will be impacted
across the county. Rural areas in Bond County are particularly vulnerable due to the likely hood
of long term power outages. Human service agencies, volunteer organizations, the Bond County
Health Department, medical and health care facilities, and schools have definite roles to play in
public education, planning, and response to extreme winter conditions.
4.4.6 Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard
Hazard Definition for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard
Explosions result from the ignition of volatile materials such as petroleum products, natural gas
and other flammable gases, hazardous materials/chemicals and dust, and explosive devices. An
explosion can potentially cause death, injury, and property damage. In addition, a fire routinely
follows an explosion, which may cause further damage and inhibit emergency response.
Emergency response may require fire, safety/law enforcement, search and rescue, and hazardous
materials units.
Previous Occurrences for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard
Bond County has not experienced a significant or large-scale hazardous material incident at a
fixed site or transportation route that has resulted in multiple deaths or serious injuries.
Geographic Location for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard
The hazardous material hazards are countywide and are primarily associated with the transport of
materials via highway or rail.
Hazard Extent for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard
The extent of the hazardous material hazard varies both in terms of the quantity of material being
transported as well as the specific content of the container.
Calculated Risk Priority Index for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport
Hazard
The possibility of a hazardous materials accident is likely, based on input from the planning
team. According to the RPI, Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport ranked as the third
highest hazard.
Probability
Magnitude
/Severity
4
RPI
12
Page67
Vulnerability Analysis for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard

Hazardous material impacts are evenly distributed across the jurisdiction; therefore the entire
county is vulnerable to a release associated with hazardous materials storage or transport and can
expect the same impacts within the affected area. The building exposure for Bond County, as
determined from building inventory, is included in Table 4-8. This plan will therefore consider
all buildings located within the county as vulnerable.
Critical Facilities
All critical facilities and communities within the county are at risk. A critical facility, if
vulnerable, will encounter many of the same impacts as other buildings within the jurisdiction.
These impacts include structural failure due to fire or explosion and loss of function of the
facility (e.g. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community). Table 4-7
lists the types and numbers of all essential facilities in the area. Critical facility information,
including replacement costs, is included in Appendix F. A map of the critical facilities is
included in Appendix G.
Building Inventory
Table 4-8 lists the building exposure in terms of type and number of buildings for the entire
county. The buildings within the county can all expect the same impacts, similar to those
discussed for critical facilities. These impacts include structural failure due to fire or explosion or
debris and loss of function of the building (e.g. a damaged home will no longer be habitable
causing residence to seek shelter).
Infrastructure
During a hazardous materials release, the types of infrastructure that could be impacted
include roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since a full inventory of
infrastructure is not available for this plan, it is important to emphasize that any number of these
items could become damaged in the event of a hazardous material release. The impacts to these
items include broken, failed, or impassable roadways; broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of
power or gas to community); and railway failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges
could fail or become impassable causing risk to traffic.
The U.S. EPAs ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) is a computer program
designed especially for use by people responding to chemical accidents, as well as for emergency
planning and training. ALOHA was utilized to assess the area of impact for an ammonia release
at the intersection of Fourth Street and the CSX Railroad Line in Greenville, IL. Rail tankers
commonly transport ammonia and other hazardous materials through the Greenville and other
municipalities in Bond County.
Ammonia is clear colorless liquid consisting of ammonia dissolved in water. It is corrosive to
tissue and metals. Although ammonia is lighter than air, the vapors from a leak will initially hug
Page68

the ground. Long term exposure to low concentrations or short term exposure to high
concentrations may result in adverse health conditions from inhalation. Prolonged exposure of
containers to fire or heat may result in their violent rupturing and rocketing. Ammonia is
generally used as a fertilizer, a refrigerant, and in the manufacture of other chemicals.
Source: http://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/24008
For this scenario, moderate atmospheric and climatic conditions with a slight breeze from the
southwest was assumed. The target area was selected for three primary reasons: 1) the high
volume of train and vehicle traffic, 2) the area is highly populated, and 3) proximity to several
critical facilities. The geographic area covered in this analysis is depicted in Figure 4-10.
Figure 4-10: Location of Chemical Release
Analysis
The ALOHA atmospheric modeling parameters, depicted in Figure 4-11, were based upon a
north-northwesterly wind speed of five miles per hour The temperature was 68F with 75%
humidity and partly cloudy skies.
Page69

The source of the chemical spill is a horizontal, cylindrical-shaped tank. The diameter of the tank
was set to 8 feet and the length set to 33 feet with 12,408 gallons of ammonia. At the time of its
release, it was estimated that the tank was 100% full. The ammonia in this tank is in a liquid
state.
This release was based on a leak from a 2.5 inch-diameter hole, at the bottom of the tank.
Figure 4-11: ALOHA Plume Modeling Parameters
SITE DATA:
Location: GREENVILLE, ILLINOIS
Building Air Exchanges Per Hour: 0.34 (sheltered single storied)
Time: June 8, 2009 1635 hours CDT (user specified)
CHEMICAL DATA:
Chemical Name: AMMONIA
Molecular Weight: 17.03 g/mol
ERPG-1: 25 ppm ERPG-2: 150 ppm ERPG-3: 750 ppm
IDLH: 300 ppm
LEL: 160000 ppm UEL: 250000 ppm
Ambient Boiling Point: -28.9 F
Vapor Pressure at Ambient Temperature: greater than 1 atm
Ambient Saturation Concentration: 1,000,000 ppm or 100.0%
ATMOSPHERIC DATA: (MANUAL INPUT OF DATA)
Wind: 5 knots from ssw at 10 meters
Ground Roughness: open country
Cloud Cover: 5 tenths
Air Temperature: 68 F
Stability Class: C
No Inversion Height
Relative Humidity: 75%
SOURCE STRENGTH:
Leak from hole in horizontal cylindrical tank
Flammable chemical escaping from tank (not burning)
Tank Diameter: 8 feet
Tank Length: 33 feet
Tank Volume: 12,408 gallons
Tank contains liquid
Internal Temperature: 68 F
Chemical Mass in Tank: 31.6 tons
Tank is 100% full
Circular Opening Diameter: 2.5 inches
Opening is 12 inches from tank bottom
Release Duration: 15 minutes
Max Average Sustained Release Rate: 7,740 pounds/min
(averaged over a minute or more)
Total Amount Released: 60,251 pounds
Note: The chemical escaped as a mixture of gas and aerosol (two phase flow).
THREAT ZONE:
Model Run: Heavy Gas
Red : 1.4 miles --- (750 ppm = ERPG-3)
Orange: 3.5 miles --- (150 ppm = ERPG-2)
Yellow: greater than 6 miles --- (25 ppm = ERPG-1)
The Emergency Response Planning Guidelines (ERPGs) were developed by the ERPG
committee of the American Industrial Hygiene Association. The ERPGs were developed as
planning guidelines, to anticipate human adverse health effects caused by exposure to toxic
Page70

chemicals. The ERPGs are three-tiered guidelines with one common denominatora one-hour
contact duration. Each guideline identifies the substance, its chemical and structural properties,
animal toxicology data, human experience, existing exposure guidelines, the rationale behind the
selected value, and a list of references. Figure 4-12 illustrates the ERPG three-tiered guidelines.
Figure 4-12: Three-Tiered ERPG Public Exposure Guidelines
The definitions and format are from the ERPG publication.

The ERPG guidelines do not protect everyone. Hypersensitive individuals would suffer adverse
reactions to concentrations far below those suggested in the guidelines. In addition, ERPGs, like
other exposure guidelines, are based mostly on animal studies, thus raising the question of
applicability to humans. The guidelines are focused on one period of timeone hour. Exposure
in the field may be longer or shorter. However, the ERPG committee strongly advises against
trying to extrapolate ERPG values to longer periods of time.
The most important point to remember about the ERPGs is that they do not contain safety factors
usually incorporated into exposure guidelines such as the TLV. Rather, they estimate how the
general public would react to chemical exposure. Just below the ERPG-1, for example, most
people would detect the chemical and may experience temporary, mild effects. Just below the
ERPG-3, on the other hand, it is estimated that the effects would be severe, although not lifethreatening. The TLV differs in that it incorporates a safety factor into its guidelines, to prevent
ill effects. The ERPG should serve as a planning tool, not a standard to protect the public.
Source: http://archive.orr.noaa.gov/cameo/locs/expguide.html
According to the ALOHA parameters, approximately 7,740 pounds per minute of material would
be released per minute. The image in Figure 4-13 depicts the plume footprint generated by
ALOHA.
Page71

Figure 4-13: Plume Footprint Generated by ALOHA
As the substance moves away from the source, the level of substance concentration decreases.
Each color-coded area depicts a level of concentration measured in parts per million (ppm). For
the purpose of clarification, this report will designate each level of concentration as a specific
zone. The zones are as follows:
Zone 1 (ERPG-3): The red buffer (750 ppm) extends no more than 1.4miles from the
point of release after one hour.
Zone 2 (ERPG-2): The orange buffer (150 ppm) extends no more than 3.2 miles from
the point of release after one hour.
Zone 3 (ERPG-1): The yellow buffer (25 ppm) extends more than six miles from the
point of release after one hour.
Zone 4 (Confidence Lines): The dashed lines depict the level of confidence in which the
exposure zones will be contained. The ALOHA model is 95% confident that the release
will stay within this boundary.
Page72

The image in Figure 4-14 depicts the plume footprint generated by ALOHA.
Figure 4-14: ALOHA Plume Footprint Overlaid in ArcGIS
Building Inventory Damage (HAZUS-MH Default Data)

HAZUS-MH estimates the exposure for the ammonia spill will be $385 million. The result of the
analysis against the HAZUS-MH building inventory is depicted in Table 4-29.
Page73

Table 4-29: Estimated Exposure for all Zones (x1000)
Occupancy
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Residential
$39,917
$48,377
$192,012
Commercial
$3,303
$18,428
$51,174
Industrial
$245
$64
$4,099
Agriculture
$221
$544
$ 786
Religious
$2,472
$1,798
$8,353
Government
$29
$371
$3,946
Education
$1,868
$47
$7,216
Total
$48,055
$69,629
$267,585
Essential Facilities Damage

There are nine essential facilities within the limits of the chemical spill plume. The affected
facilities are identified in Table 4-30. Their geographic locations are depicted in Figure 4-15.
Table 4-30: Essential Facilities within Plume Footprint

Name
Greenville Civil Defense Center
Bond County Sheriff
Greenville Police Department
Fair Oaks
Edward A Utlaut Memorial Hospital
Greenville College
Greenville Elementary School
Greenville Junior High School
Greenville High School
Page74

Figure 4-15: Essential Facilities within Plume Footprint
Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Hazardous Materials Storage and

Transport Hazard
A significant portion of the Johnson Countys population lives in close proximity to
transportation corridors such as CSX Rail Line, Norfolk Southern Rail Line, and Burlington
Northern/Santa Fe Rail Lines, Interstate 70, U.S. Route 40 and Illinois State Routes 127, 140 and
143. These areas are particularly vulnerable to chemical releases because of transportation of
hazardous materials.
Because of the concentration of Bond Countys Population to the transportation network, future
development is likely to be vulnerable. The major transportation routes in Bond County pose a
threat of dangerous chemicals and hazardous materials release Bond County will continue to
provide a comprehensive means to mitigate, prepare for, respond to, and recover from hazards
relating to hazardous materials releases.
Page75

4.4.7 Ground Failure Hazard
Subsidence
Subsidence in Illinois is a sinking of the land surface, usually associated with either underground
mining or collapse of soil into crevices in underling soluble bedrock. Areas at risk for subsidence
can be determined from detailed mapping of geologic conditions or detailed mine maps. Data
sources were compiled from the Illinois Geologic Survey and Illinois Department of Natural
Resources to assess the risk of subsidence in Bond County. This section provides an overview of
the subsidence hazards in Illinois in general and a discussion of the potential subsidence risk for
Bond County.
Underground Mining and Subsidence
Underground mines have been used extensively in Illinois to extract coal, lead, zinc, fluorites,
shale, clay stones, limestone, and dolomite. When mining first began in Illinois, land over mined
areas was sparsely populated. If the ground subsided, homes or other structures were seldom
damaged. As towns and cities expanded over mined-out areas, subsidence damage to structures
became increasingly more common. The most common underground mines in Illinois are coal
mines. A recent study in Illinois has found that approximately 333,100 housing units were
located over or adjacent to 839,000 acres mined for coal (Bauer, 2008).
Illinois has abundant coal resources. All or parts of 86 of 102 counties in the state have coalbearing strata. As of 2007, approximately 1,050,400 acres (2.8% of the state) were mined. Of
that total, 836,655 acres are underground mines (Bauer, 2008). Illinois ranks first among all U.S.
states for reserves of bituminous coal (Illinois Coal Association, 1992).
Figure 4-16a shows the statewide distribution of bedrock with karst potential, coal bearing strata,
sink holes, and underground mines. Figure 4-16b shows the counties which are 0, < 1%, and
>1% undermined; Figure 4-16c shows the countywide distribution of bedrock with karst
potential, coal bearing strata, sink holes, and underground mines.
Page76

Figures 4-16a, 4-16b, and 4-16c: Maps of Statewide and Countywide Areas with Subsidence
Hazard Potential
Page77
Mining Methods
There are two fundamental underground mining methods used in Illinois: high-extraction
methods, such as long-wall and low-extraction room, and pillar mining. High-extraction methods
remove almost all of the coal in localized areas. For modern mining practices, subsidence
associated with high-extraction methods is planned and regulated by state and federal authorities.
The subsurface subsides above the mine within several days or weeks after the coal has been
removed. Subsidence of the overburden above the mined-out area can continue up to seven years
after subsurface removal, depending on the local geologic conditions (Bauer, 2008). The initial
ground movements associated with this mining, which tend to be the largest, diminish rapidly
after a few months. After subsidence has decreased to a level that no longer causes damage to
structures, the land may be suitable for development. The maximum amount of subsidence is
proportional to the amount of material extract and the depth between the mining and the surface.
In general, over the centerline of the mine panel, subsidence can be 60% to 70% of the extract
material (e.g., 10 ft of material extracted would cause a maximum subsidence of six to seven
feet; Bauer, 2006).
For low-extraction techniques such as room-and-pillar mining, miners create openings (rooms)
as they work. Enough of the coal layer is left behind in the pillars to support the ground surface.
In Illinois, this system of mining extracts 40% to 55% of the coal resources in modern mines and
up to 75% is some older mines. Based on current state regulations, room-and-pillar mines in
operation after 1983 that do not include planned subsidence must show that they have a stable
design. Although these permitting requirements have improved overall mine stability, there are
no guarantees that subsidence will not occur above a room-and-pillar mine in the future. In
general, if coal or other mined resources has been removed from an area, subsidence of the
overlying material is always a possibility (Bauer, 2006).
Types of Mine Subsidence
In Illinois, subsidence of the land surface related to underground mining undertakes two forms:
pit subsidence or trough (sag) subsidence. Pit subsidence structures are generally six to eight feet
deep and range from two to 40 feet in diameter. Pit subsidence mostly occurs over shallow mines
that are <100 feet deep where the overlying bedrock is <50 feet thick and composed of weak
rock materials, such as shale. The pit is produced when the mine roof collapses and the roof fall
void works its way to the surface. These structures form rapidly. If the bedrock is only a few feet
thick and the surface materials are unconsolidated (loose), these materials may fall into adjacent
mine voids, producing a surface hole deeper than the height of the collapse mine void. Pit
subsidence can cause damage to a structure if it develops under the corner of a building, under a
support post of a foundation, or in another critical location. Subsidence pits should be filled to
ensure that people or animals do not fall into these structures (Bauer, 2006).
Trough subsidence forms a gentle depression over a broad area. Some trough subsidence may be
as large as a whole mine panel (i.e. several hundred feet long and a few hundred feet wide).
Several acres of land may be affected by a single trough event or feature. As previously
discussed, the maximum vertical settlement is 60% to 70% of the height of material removed
Page78

(e.g., two to six feet). Significant troughs may develop suddenly, within a few hours or days, or
gradually over a period of years. Troughs originate over places in mines where pillars have
collapsed, producing downward movement at the ground surface. These failures can develop
over mines of any depth. Trough subsidence produces an orderly pattern of tensile features
(tension cracks) surrounding a central area of possible compression features. The type and extent
of damage to surface structures relates to their orientation and position within a trough. In the
tension zone, the downward-bending movements that develop in the ground may damage
buildings, roads, sewer and water pipes, and other utilities. The downward bending of the ground
surface causes the soil to crack, forming the tension cracks that pull structures apart. In the
relatively smaller compression zone, roads may buckle and foundation walls may be pushed
inward. Buildings damaged by compressional forces typically need their foundations rebuilt and
may also need to be leveled due to differential settling (Bauer, 2006).
Mine Subsidence Insurance
The Mine Subsidence Insurance, as of 1979, created subsidence insurance as part of an Illinois
homeowners policy. Homeowners in any of the Illinois counties undermined by approximately
1% or more automatically have mine subsidence insurance as a part of their policy, unless
coverage is waived in writing. Mine subsidence insurance is especially important for homes
located near or over mines that operated before the 1977 Surface Mine Control and Reclamation
Act. The companies that operated these mines may no longer be in business (Bauer, 2006).
Mine Subsidence in Bond County
All of Bond County is underlain by rock units which potentially contain coal. Analysis of the
GIS data layer of active and abandoned coal mines in Illinois obtained from the Illinois
Department of Natural Resources (ILDNR) revealed that 4.0 mi2 out of Bond Countys total
383.0 mi2 (~ 1%) have been undermined. The undermined areas are located within and adjacent
to the towns of Panama, Sorento, and Pocahontas.
Subsidence Related to Karst Features
Subsidence can also occur on land located over soluble bedrock. The land over such bedrock
often has topography characteristics of past subsidence events. This topography is termed
karst. Karst terrain has unique landforms and hydrology found only in these areas. Bedrock in
karst areas are typically limestone, dolomite, or gypsum. In Illinois, limestone and dolomite
(carbonate rocks) are the principle karst rock types; 9% of Illinois has carbonate rock types close
enough to the ground surface to have a well-developed karst terrain. The area in Illinois in which
the karst terrain is most developed is the southern and southwestern part of the state (Panno, et
al., 1997).
Sinkhole Formation
The karst feature most associated with subsidence is the sinkhole. A sinkhole is an area of
ground with no natural external surface drainagewhen it rains, all of the water stays inside the
sinkhole and typically drains into the subsurface. Sinkholes can vary from a few feet to hundreds
Page79

of acres, and from less than one to more than 100 feet deep. Typically, sinkholes form slowly, so
that little change is seen during a lifetime, but they also can form suddenly when a collapse
occurs. Such a collapse can have a dramatic effect if it occurs in a populated setting.
Sinkholes form where rainwater moves through the soil and encounters soluble bedrock. The
bedrock begins to dissolve along horizontal and vertical cracks and joints in the rock. Eventually,
these cracks become large enough to start transporting small soil particles. As these small
particles of soil are carried off, the surface of the soil above the conduit slump down gradually,
and a small depression forms on the ground surface. This depression acts like a funnel and
gathers more water, which makes the conduit still larger and washes more soil into it.
Sinkhole Collapse
Sudden collapse of a sinkhole occurs when the soil close to the ground surface does not initially
slump down, but instead forms a bridge. Beneath that surface cover, a void forms where the soil
continues to wash into the conduit. These voids are essentially shallow caves. Over time, the
void enlarges enough that the weight of the overlying bridge can no longer be supported. The
surface layer then suddenly collapses into the void, forming a sinkhole.
The process of forming a conduit and a soil bridge usually takes years to decades to form.
However this natural process can be aggravated and expedited by human activates. Since the
process of forming a sinkhole depends on water to carry soil particle down into the karst
bedrock, anything that increases the amount of water flowing into the subsurface can accelerate
sinkhole formation process. Parking lots, streets, altered drainage from construction, and roof
drainage are a few of the things that can increase runoff.
Collapses are more frequent after intense rainstorms. However, drought and altering of the water
table can also contribute to sinkhole collapse. Areas where the water table fluctuates or has
suddenly been lowered are more susceptible to sinkhole collapse. It is also possible for
construction activity to induce the collapse of near-surface voids or caves. In areas of karst
bedrock, it is imperative that a proper geotechnical assessment be completed prior to
construction of any significant structures. Solutions to foundation problems in karst terrain
generally are expensive (White, 1988).
Sinkhole Subsidence or Collapse Potential for Bond County
Bond County is not underlain by any significant expanse of near-surface soluble bedrock (Figure
4-16c). Hence, subsidence related soluble bedrock is unlikely.
Hazard Extent for Subsidence

The extent of subsidence hazard in Bond County is a function of where current development is
located relative to areas of past and present underground mining.
Page80

Calculated Risk Priority Index for Ground Failure
Based on historical information, future ground failure in the affected regions of Bond County is
unlikely. According to the Bond County planning teams RPI assessment, ground failure ranked
as the number seven hazard.
Probability
Magnitude
/Severity
1
RPI
Vulnerability Analysis for Ground Failure

The existing buildings and infrastructure of Bond County are discussed in types and numbers in
Table 4-8.
Critical Facilities
Any critical facility built above highly soluble bedrock could be vulnerable to land subsidence. A
critical facility will encounter the same impacts as any other building within the affected
area. These impacts include damages ranging from cosmetic to structural. Buildings may sustain
minor cracks in walls due to a small amount of settling, while in more severe cases, the failure of
building foundations can cause cracking of critical structural elements. Table 4-7 lists the
essential facilities in the area. Critical facility information, including replacement costs, is
included in Appendix F. A map of the critical facilities is included in Appendix G.
Building Inventory
Table 4-8 lists the building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire
county. The buildings within this area can anticipate impacts similar to those discussed for
critical facilities, ranging from cosmetic to structural. Buildings may sustain minor cracks in
walls due to a small amount of settling, while in more severe cases, the failure of building
foundations causes cracking of critical structural elements.
Infrastructure
Land subsidence areas within Bond County could impact the roadways, utility lines/pipes,
railroads, and bridges. The risk to these structures is primarily associated with land collapsing
directly beneath them in a way that undermines their structural integrity. The impacts to these
items include broken, failed, or impassable roadways; broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of
power or gas to community); and railway failure from broken or impassable railways. In addition
bridges could fail or become impassable causing risk to traffic.
Page81
Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Ground Failure

New buildings and infrastructure placed on undermined land or on highly soluble bedrock will
be vulnerable to ground failure.
Abandoned underground mine subsidence may affect several locations within the county;
therefore buildings and infrastructure are vulnerable to subsidence. Continued development will
occur in many of these areas. Currently, Bond County reviews new development for compliance
with the local zoning ordinance. Newly planned construction should be reviewed with the
historical mining maps to minimize potential subsidence structural damage.
Page82

References:
Bauer, R.A., Su, W., 2007, Soil Site Class Map Production for Comprehensive Seismic Loss Modeling
for the State of Illinois. Illinois Geologic Survey.
Bauer, R.A. 2008. Planned Coal Mine Subsidence in Illinois: A Public Information Booklet, Circular
569, Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Illinois Geologic Survey, Springfield, Illinois.
http://www.isgs.uiuc.edu/education/pdf-files/c569.pdff, last accessed, July 16, 2008.
Bauer, R.A. 2006. Mine Subsidence in Illinois: Facts for Homeowners, Circular 573, Illinois
Department of Natural Resources and Illinois Geologic Survey, Springfield, Illinois.
http://www.isgs.uiuc.edu/education/pdf-files/c573.pdf, last accessed, July 16, 2008.
Homan, J.D. 2001, Where did that come from? Sudden sinkhole causes several accidents on U.S.
Route 51. http://thesouthern.com/articles/2001/12/26/top/export6747.prt, last accessed, July, 3, 2008.
Illinois Coal Association. 1992. Illinois coal facts: Springfield, Illinois, 64p.
National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). 2008. The Storm Events Database.
http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwEvent~Storms, last accessed August, 21, 2008.
Panno, S.V., Weibel, C.P., Li, W. 1997, Karst Regions of Illinois, Open File Series 1997-2. Illinois
Geologic Survey, Champaign, Illinois, 42 p.
Pinter, N. 1993. Exercises in Active Tectonics: An Introduction to Earthquakes and Tectonic
Geomorphology. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Stover, C.W., Coffman J.L. 1993, Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989 (Revised), U.S.
Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527. United States Government Printing Office, Washington.
United States Geologic Survey (USGS). 2008. Earthquake Hazards Program, Magnitude / Intensity
Comparison. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/topics/mag_vs_int.php, last accessed, July 10, 2008.
United States Geologic Survey (USGS). 2008. Earthquake Hazards Program, Illinois Earthquake
History. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/states/illinois/history.php, last accessed, July 10, 2008.
United States Geologic Survey (USGS). 2007. Earthquake Hazard in the Heart of America.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2006/3125/pdf/FS06-3125_508.pdf, last accessed July 10, 2008.
White, B.W. 1988. Geomorphology and Hydrology of Karst Terrains. Oxford University Press,
463p.
Page83

Section 5 - Mitigation Strategy
The goal of mitigation is to reduce a hazards future impacts including property damage,
disruption to local and regional economies, and the amount of public and private funds spent to
assist with recovery. The goal of mitigation is to build disaster-resistant communities. Mitigation
actions and projects should be based on a well-constructed risk assessment; Bond Countys is
provided in Section 4 of this plan. Mitigation should be an ongoing process that adapts over time
to accommodate the communitys needs.
5.1 Community Capability Assessment
The capability assessment identifies current activities used to mitigate hazards. The capability
assessment identifies the policies, regulations, procedures, programs, and projects that contribute
to the lessening of disaster damages. The assessment also provides an evaluation of these
capabilities to determine whether the activities can be improved in order to more effectively
reduce the impact of future hazards. The following sections identify existing plans and mitigation
capabilities within all of the communities listed in Section 2 of this plan.
5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
The county and all of its communities are members of the NFIP. As of June 18, 2007, the
Federal Emergency Services Disaster Agency NFIP Insurance Report for Illinois stated that 5
households paid flood insurance, insuring $464,400 in property value. The total premiums
collect amounted to $3,899 which on average was $134 annually. From 1978 to 2007, one claim
was filed, totaling $2,074.
The county and all incorporated areas do not participate in the National Flood Insurance
Program's (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS). The CRS is a voluntary incentive program
that recognizes and encourages community floodplain management activities that exceed the
minimum NFIP requirements. As a result, flood insurance premium rates are discounted to
reflect the reduced flood risk resulting from the community meeting the three goals of the CRS:
1) reduce flood losses; 2) facilitate accurate insurance rating; and 3) promote the awareness of
flood insurance. Table 5-1 identifies each community and the date each participant joined the
NFIP.
Section5MitigationStrategyFebruary,2010
Page84

Table 5-1: Additional Information on Communities Participating in the NFIP
Bond County
1/4/1985
1/4/1985
NA
NA
Flood Plain Zoning

Ordinance Adopted
Last
9/16/2003
City of Greenville
6/14/1974
8/5/1985
NA
NA
8/5/1985
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Village if Keyesport
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Village of Panama
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Village of Pierron
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Village of Sorento
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Community
Participation Date
FIRM Date
CRS Date
CRS
Rating
The Villages of Donnellson, Old Ripley, Pierron, Pocahontas, Smithboro, and Sorento have no
identified flood hazard boundaries; therefore, the communities do not participate in the NFIP.
The Villages of Keyesport, Mulberry Grove, and Panama do have indentified flood zones but,
have previously chosen not to participate in the program due lack of interest or perceived need.
The County will continue to educate these jurisdictions on the benefits of the program.
5.1.2 Stormwater Management Stream Maintenance Ordinance

Bond County nor its cities or villages have a storm water management plan or ordinance.
The Bond County Subdivision Ordinance (Section 504.0) does require that:
An adequate system of storm water drainage shall be constructed and
installed, consisting of drainage ponds, pipes, tiles, manholes, inlets and other
necessary facilities, that will adequately drain the subdivision and protect
roadway pavements, and will prevent excess accumulation of storm water at any
place under normal conditions. Open ditches should be avoided if possible.
Such drainage system shall be subject to approval by the County Engineer.
The City of Greenville does not address storm water or erosion control in either the
Subdivision Ordinance or the Zoning Ordinance, but the City is in the process of
forming a Unified Development Ordinance which will incorporate state requirements
for storm water and erosion control.
5.1.3 Zoning Management and Subdivision Control Ordinance
Bond County does have a zoning management ordinance and a subdivision control ordinance
which defines what a subdivision is within the County and regulation standards on subdivision
Page85

roads. This ordinance was passed in July, 1980 and covers all unincorporated areas within the
County, and those incorporated areas that are without their own subdivision ordinance.
The City of Greenville has a zoning ordinance, building codes, and a subdivision ordinance.
These are currently under review and revision as a Unified Development Ordinance.
5.1.4 Erosion Management Program/ Policy
Bond County utilizes the Illinois Administrative Code Title 35 and the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act, administered by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. This requires the
submission of a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for projects involving more than
one acre of land disturbance.
5.1.5 Fire Insurance Rating Programs/ Policy
Table 5-2 lists the fire departments in Bond County, as well as the ISO rating and the number of
members in each department.
Table 5-2: Listing of Fire Departments, Ratings, and Number of Firefighters
Fire Department
Fire Chief
Fire Insurance Rating
Number of Firefighters
Greenville Fire Department
William Johnston
ISO 5
40 - 45
ISO City 7 / Rural 9
40
Highland-Pierron Fire Department

Keyesport Fire Department
Mulberry Grove Fire Department
Pocahontas-Old Ripley Fire Department
Shoal Creek Fire Protection District
Smithboro Fire Department
Steve Plocher
Duane Wiegmann
Dwight Volkman

Kendall Brink
Gerald Knight
Dale Deverick
20
26
ISO 8
25
20
5.1.6 Land Use Plan

Bond County does have a land use plan that was adopted in 1990, but has not been updated. The
City of Greenville has an up-to-date land use plan that was adopted in 2004.
5.1.7 Building Codes
Bond County adopted its Building Code in August, 1976 as a guide for public building standards
and it incorporates International Building Code of 2003. The Bond County Zoning Ordinance
Page86

adopted December, 1991 and Amended August, 2006, requires manufactured home compliance
with Illinois law and requires tie-downs to minimize wind effects to withstand a vertical tension
force of four thousand eight hundred (4,800) pounds.
The City of Greenville has adopted the International Building Code of 2003, and has adopted by
reference the Environmental Barriers Act (ILCS Chapt. 410, Act 25, 1 et seq.). The
Greenville Zoning Code requires compliance with Illinois law (ILCS Chapt. 210, Act 115,
1),for manufactured homes and requires tie-downs to minimize wind effects. There are no
building codes specific to seismic control.
Table 5-3: Summary of Development Regulations in Bond County
Jurisdiction
Bond County
Village of
Donnellson
City of
Greenville
Village of
Keyesport
Village of
Mulberry Grove
Village of Old
Ripley
Village of
Panama
Village of
Pierron
Village of
Pocahontas
Village of
Smithboro
Village of
Sorento
% of
County
Population
Land
Use
Plan
Zoning
Ordinance
Subdivision
ordinance
Building
Code
Stormwater/
Erosion
control
Seismic
Ordinance
100%
1990
Revised
8/2006
1980
2008
no
no
2004
1974
1974
2005
no
no
1.4%
40.5%
2.6%
3.6%
0.6%
1.7%
3.5%
3.9%
1.3%
3.3%
5.2 Mitigation goals

The Bond County Emergency Services Disaster Agency, Southern Illinois UniversityCarbondale Geology Department, the Polis Group of IUPUI, and the Southwestern Illinois
Metropolitan and Regional Planning Commission assisted the Bond County Multi-Hazard
Mitigation Planning Team in the formulation of mitigation strategies and projects for Bond
County. The goals and objectives set forth were derived through participation and discussion of
the views and concerns of the Bond County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Team members and related
public input. The MHMP will focus on these goals, with a great deal of public input, to ensure
that the priorities of the communities are represented.
The goals represent long-term, broad visions of the overall vision the county would like to
achieve for mitigation. The objectives are strategies and steps which will assist the communities
Page87

to attain the listed goals. Table 5-5 lists mitigation actions, which are defined projects that will
help to complete the defined goals and objectives.
Goal 1:
Lessen the impacts of hazards to new and existing infrastructure

(a) Objective: Retrofit critical facilities with structural design practices and
equipment that will withstand natural disasters and offer weather-proofing.
(b) Objective: Equip public facilities and communities to guard against damage
caused by hazards.
(c) Objective: Minimize the amount of infrastructure exposed to hazards.
(d) Objective: Evaluate and strengthen the communication and transportation
abilities of emergency services throughout the county.
(e) Objective: Improve emergency sheltering in Bond County.
Goal 2:
Create new or revise existing plans/maps related to hazards affecting

Bond County
(a) Objective: Support compliance with the NFIP for each jurisdiction in Bond
County.
(b) Objective: Review and update existing community plans and ordinances to
support hazard mitigation.
(c) Objective: Conduct new studies/research to profile hazards and follow up with
mitigation strategies.
Goal 3:
Develop long-term strategies to educate the public on the hazards affecting

Bond County
(a) Objective: Raise public awareness on hazard mitigation.
(b) Objective: Improve education of emergency personnel and public officials.
5.3 Mitigation Actions/Projects

Upon completion of the risk assessment and development of the goals and objectives, the
Planning Committee was provided with a list of the six mitigation measure categories from the
FEMA State and Local Mitigation Planning How to Guides. The measures are listed as follows.
Prevention: Government, administrative, or regulatory actions or processes that
influence the way land and buildings are developed and built. These actions also include
public activities to reduce hazard losses. Examples include planning and zoning, building
codes, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and stormwater
management regulations.
Property Protection: Actions that involve the modification of existing buildings or

structures to protect them from a hazard or removal from the hazard area. Examples
include acquisition, elevation, structural retrofits, storm shutters, and shatter-resistant
glass.
Page88
Public Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected
officials, and property owners about the hazards and potential ways to mitigate them.
Such actions include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers,
and school-age and adult education programs.
Natural Resource Protection: Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses,

preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and
erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation
management, and wetland restoration and preservation.
Emergency Services: Actions that protect people and property during and immediately
after a disaster or hazard event. Services include warning systems, emergency response
services, and protection of critical facilities.
Structural Projects: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the
impact of a hazard. Such structures include dams, levees, floodwalls, seawalls, retaining
walls, and safe rooms.
After Meeting #3, held June 24, 2009 MHMP members were presented with the task of
individually listing potential mitigation activities using the FEMA evaluation criteria. The
MHMP members brought their mitigation ideas to Meeting #4, which was held September 2,
2009. The evaluation criteria (STAPLE+E) involved the following categories and questions.
Social:
Will the proposed action adversely affect one segment of the population?
Will the action disrupt established neighborhoods, break up voting districts, or cause
the relocation of lower income people?
Technical:
How effective is the action in avoiding or reducing future losses?
Will it create more problems than it solves?
Does it solve the problem or only a symptom?
Does the mitigation strategy address continued compliance with the NFIP?
Administrative:
Does the jurisdiction have the capability (staff, technical experts, and/or funding) to
implement the action, or can it be readily obtained?
Can the community provide the necessary maintenance?
Can it be accomplished in a timely manner?
Political:
Is there political support to implement and maintain this action?
Is there a local champion willing to help see the action to completion?
Is there enough public support to ensure the success of the action?
How can the mitigation objectives be accomplished at the lowest cost to the public?
Page89
Legal:
Does the community have the authority to implement the proposed action?
Are the proper laws, ordinances, and resolution in place to implement the action?
Are there any potential legal consequences?
Is there any potential community liability?
Is the action likely to be challenged by those who may be negatively affected?
Does the mitigation strategy address continued compliance with the NFIP?
Economic:
Are there currently sources of funds that can be used to implement the action?
What benefits will the action provide?
Does the cost seem reasonable for the size of the problem and likely benefits?
What burden will be placed on the tax base or local economy to implement this
action?
Does the action contribute to other community economic goals such as capital
improvements or economic development?
What proposed actions should be considered but be tabled for implementation until
outside sources of funding are available?
Environmental:
How will this action affect the environment (land, water, endangered species)?
Will this action comply with local, state, and federal environmental laws and
regulations?
Is the action consistent with community environmental goals?
The development of the MHMP is the first step in a multi-step process to implement projects and
policies to mitigate hazards in the county and its communities.
5.3.1 Completed or Current Mitigation Actions/Projects
Since this is the first mitigation plan developed for Bond County, there are no deleted or deferred
mitigation items. The following tables will refer to completed, ongoing, or future mitigation
actions. Table 5-4 presents the completed and ongoing mitigation actions and projects in the
county.
Page90

Table 5-4: Completed or Current Mitigation Actions
Mitigation Item
Compile a
database of
community
members with
special needs
Establish warming
and cooling
centers.
Implement a
countywide
ordinance requiring
mobile homes to
have tie-downs
Procure NOAA
weather warning
radios for schools
and hospitals
throughout the
county
Goals and Objects Satisfied

Goal: Create new or revise existing
plans/maps for Bond County
Objective: Conduct new
studies/research to profile hazards
and follow up with mitigation
strategies.
Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards
to new and existing infrastructure
Hazards
Addressed
Tornado,
Flood,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Winter Storm
Jurisdictions
Covered
Comments
Mulberry Grove
This strategy is complete.
Greenville
Objective: Improve emergency

sheltering in Bond County.
Goal: Create new or revise existing
plans/maps for Bond County
Objective: Review and update
existing, or create new, community
plans and ordinances to support
hazard mitigation.
Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards
to new and existing infrastructure
Objective: Equip public facilities and
communities to guard against
damage caused by secondary effects
of hazards.
Tornado,
Thunderstorm
Tornado,
Flood,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry Grove,
Old Ripley,
Panama, Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro, Sorento
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry Grove,
Old Ripley,
Panama, Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro, Sorento
5.4 Implementation Strategy and Analysis of Mitigation Projects

Implementation of the mitigation plan is critical to the overall success of the mitigation planning
process. The first step is to decide based upon many factors, which action will be undertaken
initially. In order to pursue the top priority first, an analysis and prioritization of the actions is
important. Some actions may occur before the top priority due to financial, engineering,
environmental, permission, and/or site control issues. Public awareness and input of these
mitigation actions can increase knowledge to capitalize on funding opportunities and monitoring
the progress of an action.
In Meeting #4, the planning team prioritized mitigation actions based on a number of factors. A
rating of High, Medium, or Low was assessed for each mitigation item and is listed next to each
item in Table 5-6. The factors were the STAPLE+E (Social, Technical, Administrative, Political,
Legal, Economic, and Environmental) criteria listed in Table 5-5.
Page91

Table 5-5: STAPLE+E planning factors
Mitigation actions are acceptable to the community if they do not adversely affect a particular
S Social
segment of the population, do not cause relocation of lower income people, and if they are
compatible with the communitys social and cultural values.
T Technical
A Administrative
P Political
L Legal
Mitigation actions are technically most effective if they provide a long-term reduction of losses and
have minimal secondary adverse impacts.
Mitigation actions are easier to implement if the jurisdiction has the necessary staffing and funding.
Mitigation actions can truly be successful if all stakeholders have been offered an opportunity to
participate in the planning process and if there is public support for the action.
It is critical that the jurisdiction or implementing agency have the legal authority to implement and
enforce a mitigation action.
Budget constraints can significantly deter the implementation of mitigation actions. Hence, it is
E Economic
important to evaluate whether an action is cost-effective, as determined by a cost benefit review,

and possible to fund.
Sustainable mitigation actions that do not have an adverse effect on the environment, comply with
E Environmental
federal, state, and local environmental regulations, and are consistent with the communitys
environmental goals, have mitigation benefits while being environmentally sound.
For each mitigation action related to infrastructure, new and existing infrastructure was
considered. Additionally, the mitigation strategies address continued compliance with the NFIP.
While an official cost benefit review was not conducted for any of the mitigation actions, the
estimated costs were discussed. The overall benefits were considered when prioritizing
mitigation items from High to Low. An official cost benefit review will be conducted prior to the
implementation of any mitigation actions. Table 5-6 presents mitigation projects developed by
the planning team.
Table 5-6: Mitigation Strategies
Mitigation Item
Establish a
mutual aid
response
agreement
Procure
generators,
transfer switches,
and portable
heaters for
warming centers
Hazards
Addressed
Jurisdictions
Covered
Priority
Comments
High
The ESDA Director will

work with local resources
to establish the
agreement. If resources
are available,
implementation will begin
within one year.
High

oversee implementation
of this project. Funding
has not been secured as
of 2009, but the PDM
program and community
grants are possible
funding sources. If
funding is available,
within one year.
Goal: Develop long-term

strategies to educate Bond
County residents on the
hazards affecting their county
Hazmat
Bond County
Objective: Improve
education and training of
emergency personnel and
public officials
Goal: Lessen the impacts of

hazards to individuals and
infrastructure
Winter Storm
Objective: Improve
emergency sheltering in Bond
County.
Bond County,
Sorento
Page92

Mitigation Item
Submit
application to join
the NFIP
Purchase signage
for roads that
flood frequently:
Shoal Creek
Road (Sorento),
Old Ripson Road
(Sorento),
Trestle Road
(Panama)
Construct safe
houses in key
locations within
the county
Conduct an
engineering study
to investigate
redundancy in
public water
supply
Improve drainage
in key
communities in
the county
Hazards
Addressed
Goal: Create new or revise

existing plans/maps for Bond
County
Objective: Support
compliance with the NFIP for
each jurisdiction in Bond
County.
Flood
Jurisdictions
Covered
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Priority
Comments
High
Only the county and the

City of Greenville
currently participate in the
NFIP. The county
Floodplain Manger and
ESDA will work with
representatives from
other communities, as
well as IEMA and FEMA,
to encourage the
remaining communities in
the county to participate
in the program.
High
The ESDA Director and

County Engineer will
oversee this project and
will seek funding from
resources such as ILDOT
or the PDM program. If
within one year.

infrastructure
Objective: Evaluate and

strengthen the
communication and
transportation abilities of
emergency services
throughout the county.
Flood

hazards to individuals.
Objective: Improve
emergency sheltering in Bond
County.
Sorento,
Panama
Tornado,
Thunderstorm
Sorento,
Smithboro,
Mulberry Grove
High
Flood
Bond County
Medium
Flood
Bond County,
Sorento,
Smithboro,
Mulberry Grove
Medium

County
studies/research to profile
hazards and follow up with

hazards to new and existing
infrastructure
Objective: Minimize the
amount of infrastructure
exposed to hazards.

work with local shelters to
complete this project. The
PDM program or local
resources are funding
options. If funding is
available, implementation
will begin within one year.
The ESDA Director or
County Engineer will
will work with IDNR on
the engineering aspects.
The county will seek a
planning grant from IDNR
or community
improvement programs. If
within three years.
work with local drainage
districts, IDOT, IDNR,
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers to evaluate the
current conditions of the
countys waterways and
drainage and develop a
plan. Funding has not
been secured as of 2009,
but county, state, and
federal funding will be
sought. Implementation
will begin within three
years.
Page93

Mitigation Item
Establish an
LEPC and write a
CEMP for all
hazards
Implement Nixle
for mass media
release via e-mail
and text
messages
Develop a public
education
program to
present at public
events, e.g.
county fair, and in
schools
Create maps of
undermined
areas in the
county
Trim trees to
minimize the
amount/duration
of power outages

Objective: Improve
education and training of
emergency personnel and
public officials.
infrastructure
strengthen the
communication and
emergency services

Objective: Raise public
awareness on hazard
mitigation.
Hazards
Addressed
Jurisdictions
Covered
Priority
Comments
Medium

work with local officials to
establish an LEPC.
Seeking assistance from
IEMA, the LEPC and
FEMA will write a CEMP
for the countys hazards.
If resources are available,
within three years.
Medium

oversee this project.
Local resources will be
used to implement the
project and notify the
public. If resources are
available, this project will
begin within three years.
Tornado,
Flood,
Earthquake,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm,
Hazmat,
Subsidence
Bond County
Tornado,
Flood,
Earthquake,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm,
Hazmat,
Subsidence
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Tornado,
Flood,
Earthquake,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm,
Hazmat,
Subsidence
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Medium
Subsidence
Bond County
Medium
Winter Storm
Bond County
Low

County
Objective: Review and
update existing, or create
new, community plans and
ordinances to support hazard
mitigation.

infrastructure
exposed to hazards.

oversee this project.
used to develop
educational literature and
present to each
jurisdiction at public
events or in schools. If
resources are available,
the project will be
implemented within three
years.
The ESDA Director with
assistance from the
county engineer will
oversee this project. The
county will seek
assistance from IDNR. If
within three years.
work with local power
cooperatives or
companies for
implementation of this
project. Funding has not
but the PDM program,
ILDOT, or IEMA are
possibilities. If funding is
available, implementation
will begin within five
years.
Page94

Mitigation Item
Compile a
database of 4x4
vehicles for
transportation of
people and
supplies

County
studies/research to profile
hazards and follow up with

infrastructure
Procure back-up
generators for
critical facilities
Hazards
Addressed
Objective: Equip public

facilities and communities to
guard against damage
caused by secondary effects
of hazards.
Winter Storm
Jurisdictions
Covered
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Priority
Comments
Low

will work with local
resources and IDNR.
used to create and
maintain the database. If
within five years.
Flood,
Tornado,
Earthquake,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Low
Tornado,
Flood,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Mulberry
Grove,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Low
Flood,
Tornado,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento )
Low
Flood
Sorento
Low

infrastructure
Establish backup
power for warning
sirens
Develop a
program to
distribute weather
radios to all
critical facilities
Begin storm
sewer
construction

strengthen the
communication and
emergency services

infrastructure
Objective: Equip public
facilities and communities to
guard against damage
caused by secondary effects
of hazards.

infrastructure
exposed to hazards.

oversee the
implementation of this
project. Funding has not
but the pre-disaster
mitigation program and
community development
grants are possible
funding sources. If
funding is available, this
project is forecasted to
begin within five years.
The ESDA Director
oversees the
implementation of the
project. Local resources
will be used to research
options for backup power.
Additional funding will be
sought from other funding
sources, e.g. PDM
program. Implementation,
if funding is available, is
forecasted to begin within
five years.
oversee implementation
of this project. Local
resources will be used to
determine how many
radios are needed and
when/where to distribute
them. Funding has not
but the PDM program and
community grants are an
option. Implementation, if
funding is available, will
The county engineer will
work with IDOT and IDNR
to evaluate the current
conditions of the
communitys sewer
system and develop a
plan. Funding has not
but county, state, and
federal funding will be
sought. Implementation
will begin within three
years.
Page95

The Bond County Emergency Services Disaster Agency will be the local champions for the
mitigation actions. The county commissioners and the city and town councils will be an integral
part of the implementation process. Federal and state assistance will be necessary for a number
of the identified actions. Southern Five Regional Planning Commission is qualified to provide
technical grant writing services to assist the county in seeking resources to achieve the
recommended mitigation action.
5.5 Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Strategy
As a part of the multi-hazard mitigation planning requirements, at least two identifiable
mitigation action items have been addressed for each hazard listed in the risk assessment and for
each jurisdiction covered under this plan.
Each of the 10 jurisdictions, including Bond County, were invited to participate in brainstorming
sessions in which goals, objectives, and strategies were discussed and prioritized. Each
participant in these sessions was armed with possible mitigation goals and strategies provided by
FEMA, as well as information about mitigation projects discussed in neighboring communities
and counties. All potential strategies and goals that arose through this process are included in this
plan. The county planning team used FEMAs evaluation criteria to gauge the priority of all
items. A final draft of the disaster mitigation plan was presented to all members to allow for final
edits and approval of the priorities.
Page96

Section 6 - Plan Maintenance
6.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan
Throughout the five-year planning cycle, the Bond County Emergency Service and Disaster
Director will reconvene the MHMP planning committee to monitor, evaluate, and update the
plan on an annual basis. Additionally, a meeting will be held during March 2015 to address the
five-year update of this plan. Members of the planning committee are readily available to engage
in email correspondence between annual meetings. If the need for a special meeting arises, due
to new developments or a declared disaster, the team will meet as necessary to update mitigation
strategies. Depending on grant opportunities and fiscal resources, mitigation projects may be
implemented independently by individual communities or through local partnerships.
The committee will review the county goals and objectives to determine their relevance to
changing situations in the county. In addition, state and federal policies will be reviewed to
ensure they are addressing current and expected conditions. The committee will also review the
risk assessment portion of the plan to determine if this information should be updated or
modified. The parties responsible for the various implementation actions will report on the status
of their projects and will include which implementation processes worked well, any difficulties
encountered, how coordination efforts are proceeding, and which strategies should be revised.
Updates or modifications to the MHMP during the five-year planning process will require a
public notice and a meeting prior to submitting revisions to the individual jurisdictions for
approval. The plan will be updated via written changes, submissions as the committee deems
appropriate and necessary, and as approved by the county commissioners.
The GIS data used to prepare the plan was obtained from existing county GIS data as well as
data collected as part of the planning process. This updated HAZUS-MH GIS data has been
returned to the county for use and maintenance in the countys system. As newer data becomes
available, this updated data will be used for future risk assessments and vulnerability analyses.
6.2 Implementation through Existing Programs
The results of this plan will be incorporated into ongoing planning efforts. Many of the
mitigation projects identified as part of this planning process are ongoing. Where needed,
modifications will be made to the county and community planning documents and ordinances as
part of regular updates. The mitigation plan will be used to help guide building code changes and
land use planning.
6.3 Continued Public Involvement
Continued public involvement is critical to the successful implementation of the MHMP.
Comments from the public on the MHMP will be received by Bond County Emergency
Management Director and forwarded to the MHMP planning committee for discussion.
Education efforts for hazard mitigation will be ongoing through the local television stations,
brochures, and yearly public meetings. Once adopted, a copy of this plan will be posted in the
library and on the county website.
Section6PlanMaintenanceFebruary,2010
Page97
Glossary of Terms
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
A
AEGL Acute Exposure Guideline Levels
ALOHA Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres
B
BFE Base Flood Elevation
C
CAMEO Computer-Aided Management of Emergency Operations
CEMA County Emergency Services Disaster Agency
CEMP Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
CERI Center for Earthquake Research and Information
CRS Community Rating System
D
DEM Digital Elevation Model
DFIRM Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map
DMA Disaster Mitigation Act
E
EAP Emergency Action Plan
ERPG Emergency Response Planning Guidelines
EMA Emergency Services Disaster Agency
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESDA - Emergency and Disaster Services
F
FEMA Federal Emergency Services Disaster Agency
FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Maps
FIS Flood Information Study
GLOSSARYOFTERMSFebruary,2010
Page98
G
GIS Geographic Information System
H
HAZUS-MH Hazards USA Multi-Hazard
HUC Hydrologic Unit Code
I
IDNR Illinois Department of Natural Resources
IEMA Illinois Emergency Services Disaster Agency
L
-
LEPC Local Emergency Planning Committee

______________________________________________________________________________
M
MHMP Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
N
NCDC National Climatic Data Center
NEHRP National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program
NFIP National Flood Insurance Program
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
P
PPM Parts Per Million
R
RPI Risk Priority Index
Page99
S
SPC Storm Prediction Center
SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
SIUC - Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
______________________________________________________________________________
_
T
TEEL - Temporary Emergency Exposure Limit
U
USGS United States Geological Survey
Page100
Appendices
AppendicesFebruary,2010
Page101

Appendix A Minutes of the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning
Team
Meetings
Page102
Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan Minutes

Planning Program Oversight Meeting:
County Board Chairs, Emergency Services & Disaster Agency Coordinators, Southwestern
Illinois Metropolitan and Regional Area Planning Commission, SIUC Geology
Department, and IUPUI-Polis
Meeting Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Meeting Time: 1 hour 30 minutes
Place: Clinton County Courthouse Boardroom
Attendance:
Dave Coats, POLIS
John Buechler, POLIS
Nicholas Pinter, SIUC Geology
Andy Flor, SIUC Geology
Harvey Hanson SIUC Geology
Kevin Terveer, Southwestern Ill Metro and Regional Area Planning Commission
(SIMAPC)
Linda Tragesser, Southwestern Ill Metro and Regional Area Planning Commission
(SIMAPC)
Jill Franks, Bond County Board Chair
Ray Kloeckner, Clinton County Board Chairman
Allan Davis, Bond County ESDA
Richard Crocker, Clinton County ESDA
The meeting was called to order.
Dave Coats (associate director) and John Buechler (project manager) from IUPUI, Polis
Center explained the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Planning Project. It was explained that
FEMA, based on Federal legislation passed in 2000, required that all incorporated
communities must have a Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan in place to be eligible for FEMA
mitigation funding. They also explained that a 25% match was needed to receive funding.
John Buechler stated that the value of the GIS data and sweat equity that will be put into
developing this plan would satisfy the match. He also expresses the importance of tracking
and documenting the time spent on the project by each volunteer working on the project.
Dave Coats and John Buechler explained the process for developing the plan and that it
will require a total of six meetings in each of the counties. They went into great detail about
each of the meeting and the issues that would be addressed. They also estimated that the
complete process of developing the plan would take about one year. Lastly, they introduced
Page103

a website that the planning team will use to organize meeting, post documents, and to
access minutes throughout the planning process.
Dr. Nicholas Pinter (SIUC Geology) introduced the team and explained the role that SIUC
will play in planning process. SIUC will be providing all the technical mapping throughout
the planning process.
There was a general discussion about the agreement that will need to be made about the
restricted use of the GIS data needed for the project. Andy Flor, Nicholas Pinter, Dave
Coats, and John Buechler all confirmed that a Memorandum of Understanding would be
created and sent to each county for review and acceptance. All the County Board Chairmen
expressed their concerns with the discretion of the use of the GIS data asked how the
planning team would be selected. Dave Coats responded and said that a list of affiliations
is provided for ideal team member candidacy. He explained that the Emergency
Management Agency is typically selected as the chair of the planning team. Lastly, he
mentioned that the planning team must be officially recognized by the County Board.
Nicholas Pinter added that as soon as a planning team is assembled the first meeting can be
scheduled.
After a few questions that clarified the planning process and the presentation of example
planning documents of Posey County, Indiana the meeting was adjourned.
Meeting was adjourned.
Page104

BOND COUNTY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)
Page105
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Minutes

Bond County Planning Team
Assembly of the Bond County Planning Team, Meeting #1:
Chairman & Primary Point of Contact: Allan Davis, Bond County ESDA Coordinator
Plan Directors: Southwestern Illinois Metro & Regional Planning Commission, SIUC
Geology
Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 2, 2008, at 7:00 p.m.
Meeting Time: 1.5 hours
Place: Bond County Courthouse, County Board Room
Planning Team/Attendance:
Allan Davis, Coordinator Bond County ESDA and 911-Board / City of Greenville
Jill Franks, Bond County Board Chair
Jonathan Remo SIUC Geology
Nicholas Pinter SIUC Geology
Dave Coats Polis Center
John Buechler Polis Center
Kevin Terveer, Southwestern Illinois Metro & Regional Planning Commission
Dale R. Deverick, Smithboro Village Fire Chief
Tom Hoffmann, Greenville Regional Airport / Keyesport Fire Protection District
Steve Plocher, Fire Chief, Highland-Pierron Fire Protection District/ Village of Pierron
Introduction to the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Process

An outline of the pre-disaster mitigation planning process was presented by John Buechler,
Dave Coats, and Nicholas Pinter.
Dave Coats introduced the Planning Team Website. A username and password was given
to the
planning team to access the web site. He explained that this website is used to schedule
meeting
dates, contact information and to download material pertaining to the planning process.
Page106

Dave Coats noted that there are several components to the planning process. The 1st phase
is to organize all the resources. The primary resource is the planning team members. Other
resources will include GIS Data and Data from the Supervisor of Assessments Office.
This project is funded by a match grant from FEMA. A twenty-five percent local match
will be required from each county to fund this project. The match will be met by sweat
equity and GIS
data acquired from each county. Sweat equity will be an accumulation of time spent at the
meetings, on research assignments, surveys, time spent reviewing a document and time
spent
producing the planning document. The value of the match is estimated to be $10,000 to
$15,000.
The 2nd phase is to assess the risk of the hazards that are present in the county. A profile of
the
county will be provided by Southwestern Illinois Metro & Regional Planning Commission.
Phase 3 of this planning process is to develop a strategy and the projects that the county is
interested in. Phase four is the implementation of those strategies over a period of time and
monitoring their progress.
Nicholas Pinter added that this is not just an intellectual process. There will be work and
research that will need to be performed to finish this project and to get funding for potential
projects that result from this plan.
Dave Coats stated that FEMA will not provide funding for projects where the county has
not
produced a Pre-disaster Mitigation Plan. In the 1st meeting, the planning team will review
and will be asked to research the location of all critical facilities within the county. He also
discussed a plan for public participation. He explained that all of the meetings are open to
the public but there will be a particular effort made to invite the public to the 3rd meeting
when the plan is in draft form. At that meeting, SIUC Geology staff will discuss the
geology of the area and several facts about this particular county.
In the 2nd meeting, a discussion will focus on disasters that are prone to this area. These
hazards will be given a probability rating and ranked in a probability hierarchy. Polis and
SIUC Geology
will research these hazards and rank them. A special effort to encourage the public to
attend and participate in the 3rd meeting . The Polis and SIUC Geology staff will produce a
risk assessment in draft form; each planning team member will get a copy. Strategies and
projects will be presented that FEMA and other counties have undertaken.
The 4th meeting consists of a brain storming session focused on the disasters that were
modeled and what was learned about them through the analysis of the Chapter 4. The
Planning Team will consider strategies and projects mitigate potential loss and damage.
FEMA requires that for every identified potential hazard, a strategy to mitigate the loss and
damage must be in place. The strategies may range from educational awareness to
Page107

hardening a building or constructing a levee. Following that meeting, the plan will be in
final draft form.
At the 5th meeting the planning team will review and adopt the plan prior to forwarding it to
IEMA. IEMA will review the plan and will make recommendations to it as they see fit
and then
it is submitted to FEMA for review and approval. Once it is approved by FEMA, the plan is
sent back to the county.
At the 6th meeting the planning team will present the plan to the Bond County Board to be
adopted. Every incorporated community must have one of these plans, or the communities
may be included under the umbrella of the county plan. In order for that to happen,
communities are encouraged to participate and contribute to plan development. Once the
County Board has adopted the plan, each incorporated community will need to adopt the
plan as well. Once the plan has been submitted to FEMA, local governments are eligible to
apply for grants to mitigate
these established hazards.
With remarks concluded, and no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
Page108
Page109

Bond County Identification and Prioritization of Disasters: Meeting #2 :
Geology
Meeting Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2009, at 7:00 p.m.
Place: Bond County Board Room
Jill Franks, Bond County Board Chairman
Jonathan Remo, SIUC Geology
Dave Coats, Polis
John Buechler, Polis
Allan Davis, Bond County County ESDA
Hiram Renfro, Village of Donnellson
Lora Kennedy, Village of Smithboro
Linda Tragesser, Southwestern Illinois Metro & Regional Planning Commission
Hazard Identification and Prioritization

Nicholas Pinter of The SIU-C Geology Department advised the group that the purpose of
Meeting #2 is to identify hazards and risks that threaten the citizens, facilities, and
infrastructure that have been identified for Bond County in our previous meetings. The
previous Bond County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) did not
contain a risk analysis. Additional local planning documents were reviewed to identify
historical hazards and help identify risk, FIRM maps were discussed for the flood analysis.
The planning team developed and ranked a list of hazards that affect the county. The team
identified
1. severe thunderstorms with tornadoes
2. winter storms
3. earthquakes, and
4. flooding which occurs on an annual basis during the spring.
Page110

The team also identified Bond Countys principal technological hazards (in order of
likelihood):
1) land transportation accidents with hazardous material release,
2) mine subsidence, and
3) dam failure.
In addition to these identified hazards, the MHMP planning committee reviewed the list of
natural hazards prepared by FEMA, and historical storm event data was compiled from the
National Climatic Data Center. This NCDC data included 192 reported events in Bond
County between December 2, 1950 and April 2, 2008.
Dr. Pinter advised that in addition to NCDC data, Storm Prediction Center (SPC) data
associated with tornadoes, strong winds, and hail will be plotted in the display maps that
will be provided at the Public Meeting.
The Climatic Data Center listed the following hazards for Bond County:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Tornadoes
Drought/Extreme Heat
Winter Storms
Flood/Flash Floods
Based on planning team inputthese hazards ranked the highest based on the Risk Priority
Index discussed
:
Tornado
Winter Storms
Tornadoes
Hazardous Material Release /Transportation
Earthquakes
Flooding
Mine Subsidence
Dam Failure
Calculating the Risk Priority Index
The first step in determining the Risk Priority Index (RPI) was to have the planning team
members generate a list of hazards which have befallen or could potentially befall their
community. Next, the planning team members were asked to assign a likelihood rating
based on the criteria and methods described in the following table. This ranking was based
upon previous history and the definition of hazard. Using the definitions given, the
likelihood of future events is "Quantified" which results in the classification within one of
the four "Ranges" of likelihood.
Page111

Probability
4 - Highly Likely
3 - Likely
2 - Possible
1 - Unlikely
Characteristics
Event is probable within the calendar year.

Event has up to 1 in 1 year chance of occurring.
(1/1=100%) History of events is greater than 33% likely per
year.
Event is probable within the next three years.
Event has up to 1 in 3 years chance of occurring.
(1/3=33%) History of events is greater than 20% but less
than or equal to 33% likely per year.
Event is probable within the next five years.
(1/5=20%) History of events is greater than 10% but less
than or equal to 20% likely per year.
Event is possible within the next ten years.
(1/10=10%) History of events is less than or equal to 10%
likely per year.
Next, planning team members were asked to consider the potential magnitude/severity of
the hazard according to the severity associated with past events of the hazard.
Magnitude/Severity
8 - Catastrophic
4 - Critical
2 - Limited
1 - Negligible
Characteristics
Multiple deaths.
Complete shutdown of facilities for 30 or more days.
Injuries and/or illnesses result in permanent disability.
Complete shutdown of critical facilities for at least 14
days.
Injuries and/or illnesses do not result in permanent
disability.
Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than
Injuries and/or illnesses are treatable with first aid.
Minor quality of life lost.
Shutdown of critical facilities and services for 24 hours
or less.
L
th 10% f
t i
l d
d
Finally, the RPI was calculated by multiplying the probability by the magnitude/severity of
the hazard. Using these values, the planning team members where then asked to rank the
hazards. The following shows the RPI and ranking for each hazard facing Bond County as
determined by the discussion of the planning team members.
Page112

Hazard
3 - Likely
3 - Likely
4 -Critical
4 - Critical
Risk Priority
Index
12
12
3 - Likely
4 - Critical
12
4- Highly Likely
2 - Possible
2 - Possible
1 -Unlikely
1 -Unlikely
2 - Limited
4 - Critical
1 - Negligible
1 - Negligible
1 - Negligible
8
8
2
1
1
4
5
6
7
8
Probability
Winter Storms
Tornado
Hazardous Material
Release
Earthquakes
Flooding
Mine Subsidence
Dam Failure
Magnitude/Severity
Rank
1
2
The jurisdictions in Bond County differ in their susceptibilities to certain hazardsfor

example, the City of Greenville located along Interstate 70 and a major rail line is more
likely to experience a significant Hazardous Material Release related to a transportation
accident than the village of Sorento which is located a substantial distance away from any
major transportation route. The hazards identified by the planning team will be ranked by
input from the other planning team members, available historical data, and the hazard
modeling results.
Hazard
Jurisdiction
Tornado
HAZMAT
Earthquake
Thunderstorms
Flooding
Winter
Storms
Subsidence
Dam Failure
Greenville
NA
Donnellson
NA
NA
Keyesport
NA
NA
Mulberry
Grove
NA
NA
Old Ripley
NA
NA
Panama
NA
Pierron
NA
NA
Pocahontas
NA
Smithboro
NA
NA
Sorento
NA
NA = Not applicable
The planning team discussed the continued identification/location of critical facilities so

SIU-C can map and model these facilities according to threats identified within two weeks.
The next meeting will be a public meeting to report on the hazards modeled and threats
identified. That meeting will be held at the end of June and will be held in the evening
(7:00) at the Bond County Board Room. The meeting will be publicized by press release
and the public will be encouraged to attend and provide input.
Page113
Page114
Page115

Assembly of the Bond County Planning Team, Public Meeting, Meeting #3:
Geology
Meeting Date: Thursday, June 24, 2009 at 7:00 p.m.
Allan Davis, Bond County ESDA
Lora Kennedy, Village President, Smithboro
Steve Kennedy, Village of Smithboro
Duane Wiegemann, Fire Chief, Village of Keyesport
Matt Willman, City of Greenville
Jeff Leidel, Greenville Advocate
Media Representative
Dr. Nicholas Pinter welcomed everyone to the meeting and introduced the lead agencies
and plan directors involved in the formulation of the Bond County Multi-Hazard Mitigation
Plan. He provided the audience with background information concerning the Countys
need for a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan and explained that this project is mandated by the
Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. Dr. Pinter pointed out that the plan was being
done at no cost to Bond County thanks to a grant received from FEMA and the Illinois
Emergency Management Agency, and that the Countys twenty-five percent required
match to FEMAs grant would be provided by work and data input into to the plan by
County staff, and by the sweat equity provided by the Planning Team participants.
Dr. Pinter then explained that this was the third in a series of Plan meetings, and is planned
as a public meeting to present the Hazard Risk Assessment that had been developed with
input received during the first two meetings of the Planning Team, and through computer
modeling carried out by the SIU-Carbondale Geography Department and facilitated by the
POLIS group from IUPUI. Dr. Pinter then proceeded with the presentation of the Hazard
Risk Assessment.
Page116

Hazard Risk Assessment
Dr. Pinter began his presentation by providing a list of natural hazards that had occurred
historically within the County and provided a rating of their potential risk. He explained
that the list had been discussed, expanded, and prioritized during the second meeting of the
Planning Team, and that the list is in draft form and subject to reevaluation during the
planning process. Dr. Pinter then provided historical references of past natural hazard
occurrences in Bond County and discussed the extent to which these hazards had impacted
the County. He went on to suggest some solutions the County could act upon to limit or
eliminate the effect hazards might have in the future. These solutions primarily involved
avoidance of, protection from, and preparation for the hazards. He provided the definition
of mitigation and explained how hazard mitigation evolves in the planning process.
Dr. Pinter then present the full risk assessment that is included in Section 4 of the draft plan
document after briefly describing all of the different Sections included in the draft plan. He
outlined the format of Section 4, and detailed the sources from which the information was
accumulated. He explained how the methods and calculation were established, and focused
on particular hazards that had been modeled by the HAZUS-MH computer software that
simulates the circumstances and resulting cost analysis generated by a given, defined
hazard. In particular, he outlined the modeling developed for:
a hypothetical 100-year overbank flood event,
a hypothetical F-4 tornado,
a hypothetical 7.7 earthquake along the New Madrid Fault,
a 7.1 earthquake along the Wabash Valley Fault,
a 5.5 earthquake along the Wabash Valley Fault and
a Hazardous material leak using an ALOHA Plume modeling for an ammonia leak
hypothetically occurring along the CSX railroad line at Fourth St. in Greenville.
Estimates of the numbers of buildings and facilities damaged, as well as cost estimates and
loss of life estimates were presented for each of the scenarios.
Following the presentation on risk assessment Dr. Pinter explained that at the next meeting
of the Planning Team would be for the purpose of identifying mitigation projects and
strategies that needed to be planned and implemented in the County and its communities in
order to minimize or reduce the risk presented by the potential hazards identified. Each
person would receive a copy of the FEMA publication, Mitigation Ideas, and Dr. Pinter
asked each person to come to the next meeting prepared to provide five ideas they think
need to occur in the County, or in their community, to mitigate for the hazards identified.
Dr. Pinter further explained that once all the information and suggestions on mitigation and
plan implementation are compiled, a preliminary draft of the plan document will be
provided to the Planning Team for discussion and approval. Following local review,
Page117

revision, and approval a final draft is forwarded to IEMA for review and approval. The
IEMA then submits the draft plan to FEMA for its approval. Following FEMA approval,
the document is then presented by the Planning Team to the Bond County Board for
Adoption, and would then be submitted to the municipal councils and boards for adoption.
The next meeting of the Bond County MHMP committee will be scheduled for August or
early September, 2009 at the Bond County Board Room at 7:00 p.m.
Page118
Page119

Assembly of Bond County Planning Team, Mitigation Strategies: Meeting #4 :
Geology
Meeting Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, at 7:00 p.m.
James Moore, Village of Pocahontas
Doug Enloe, President, Village of Mulberry Grove
Linda Hansen, Village of Sorento Board
Dale Deverick, Village of Smithboro Fire Chief
The meeting was called to order
Jonathan Remo of SIU-C Geography Department reviewed the objectives of this planning
project, and reviewed progress on the plan to date. Dr. Remo explained the purpose of
todays meeting as developing Mitigation Strategies for the hazards that have previously
been identified and prioritized.
Each member had a copy of the FEMA publication, Mitigation Ideas. The group then
went through the list of hazards discussing each, identifying mitigation activities the
County or a community might already have enacted, and addressing each hazard with one
or more mitigation idea. After all the strategies were listed Dr. Remo asked the attendees
to prioritize them weighing their overall merit against the estimated benefits of each
mitigation action.
The following list of Mitigation Activities already implemented was identified:
Page120

Mitigation Item
Compile a
database of
community
members with
special needs
Establish warming
and cooling
centers.
Implement a
countywide
ordinance
requiring mobile
homes to have
tie-downs
Procure NOAA
weather warning
radios for schools
and hospitals
throughout the
county

County
studies/research to profile hazards
and follow up with mitigation
strategies.
infrastructure
Hazards
Addressed
Tornado,
Flood,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Winter Storm
Jurisdictions
Covered
Comments
Mulberry Grove
This strategy is
complete.
Greenville
This strategy is
complete.
Objective: Improve emergency

sheltering in Bond County.
County
Objective: Review and update
existing, or create new, community
plans and ordinances to support
hazard mitigation.
infrastructure
Objective: Equip public facilities
and communities to guard against
damage caused by secondary
effects of hazards.
Tornado,
Thunderstorm
Tornado,
Flood,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry Grove,
Old Ripley,
Panama, Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry Grove,
Old Ripley,
Panama, Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
This strategy is
complete.
This strategy is
complete.
Itemized list of Hazards along with location information and priority assigned.
Mitigation
Item
Establish a
mutual aid
response
agreement
Goals and
Objects Satisfied
Goal: Develop
long-term
strategies to
educate Bond
County residents
on the hazards
affecting their
county
Objective:
Improve
education and
training of
emergency
personnel and
public officials
Hazards
Addressed
Hazmat
Jurisdictions
Covered
Bond County
Priority
Comments
High
The ESDA Director will work with

local resources to establish the
agreement. If resources are
available, implementation will begin
within one year.
Page121

Mitigation
Item
Procure
generators,
transfer
switches, and
portable
heaters for
warming
centers
Goals and
Objects Satisfied
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to
individuals and
infrastructure
Hazards
Addressed
Winter Storm
Bond County,
Sorento
Flood
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Objective:
Improve
emergency
sheltering in Bond
County.
Goal: Create new
or revise existing
plans/maps for
Bond County
Submit
application to
join the NFIP
Purchase
signage for
roads that
flood
frequently:
Shoal Creek
Road
(Sorento), Old
Ripson Road
(Sorento),
Trestle Road
(Panama)
Construct safe
houses in key
locations
within the
county
Conduct an
engineering
study to
investigate
redundancy in
public water
supply
Objective:
Support
compliance with
the NFIP for each
jurisdiction in
Bond County.
Jurisdictions
Covered
Priority
Comments
High
The ESDA Director will oversee

implementation of this project.
Funding has not been secured as
of 2009, but the PDM program and
community grants are possible
funding sources. If funding is
within one year.
High
Only the county and the City of

Greenville currently participate in
the NFIP. The county Floodplain
Manger and ESDA will work with
representatives from other
communities, as well as IEMA and
FEMA, to encourage the remaining
communities in the county to
participate in the program.
High
The ESDA Director and County

Engineer will oversee this project
and will seek funding from
resources such as ILDOT or the
PDM program. If funding is
within one year.
High

local shelters to complete this
project. The PDM program or local
resources are funding options. If
implementation will begin within
one year.
Medium
The ESDA Director or County

Engineer will oversee this project
and will work with IDNR on the
engineering aspects. The county
will seek a planning grant from
IDNR or community improvement
programs. If funding is available,
three years.
Goal: Lessen the

impacts of
hazards to
individuals and
infrastructure
Objective:
Evaluate and
strengthen the
communication
and transportation
abilities of
emergency
services
throughout the
county.
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to
individuals.
Objective:
Improve
emergency
sheltering in Bond
County.
Goal: Create new
or revise existing
plans/maps for
Bond County
Objective:
Conduct new
studies/research
to profile hazards
and follow up with
mitigation
strategies.
Flood
Sorento,
Panama
Tornado,
Thunderstorm
Sorento,
Smithboro,
Mulberry
Grove
Flood
Bond County
Page122

Mitigation
Item
Improve
drainage in
key
communities
in the county
Establish an
LEPC and
write a CEMP
for all hazards
Implement
Nixle for mass
media release
via e-mail and
text messages
Develop a
public
education
program to
present at
public events,
e.g. county
fair, and in
schools
Goals and
Objects Satisfied
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to new
and existing
infrastructure
Objective:
Minimize the
amount of
infrastructure
exposed to
hazards.
Goal: Develop
long-term
strategies to
educate Bond
County residents
on the hazards
affecting their
county
Objective:
Improve
education and
training of
emergency
personnel and
public officials.
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to
individuals and
infrastructure
Objective:
Evaluate and
strengthen the
communication
and transportation
abilities of
emergency
services
throughout the
county.
Goal: Develop
long-term
strategies to
educate Bond
County residents
on the hazards
affecting their
county
Objective: Raise
public awareness
on hazard
mitigation.
Hazards
Addressed
Flood
Jurisdictions
Covered
Bond County,
Sorento,
Smithboro,
Mulberry
Grove
Tornado,
Flood,
Earthquake,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm,
Hazmat,
Subsidence
Bond County
Tornado,
Flood,
Earthquake,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm,
Hazmat,
Subsidence
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Tornado,
Flood,
Earthquake,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm,
Hazmat,
Subsidence
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Priority
Comments
Medium

local drainage districts, IDOT,
IDNR, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers to evaluate the current
conditions of the countys
waterways and drainage and
develop a plan. Funding has not
been secured as of 2009, but
county, state, and federal funding
will be sought. Implementation will
Medium

local officials to establish an LEPC.
Seeking assistance from IEMA, the
LEPC and FEMA will write a CEMP
for the countys hazards. If
three years.
Medium

this project. Local resources will be
used to implement the project and
notify the public. If resources are
available, this project will begin
within three years.
Medium

this project. Local resources will be
used to develop educational
literature and present to each
jurisdiction at public events or in
schools. If resources are available,
the project will be implemented
within three years.
Page123

Mitigation
Item
Create maps
of undermined
areas in the
county
Trim trees to
minimize the
amount/durati
on of power
outages
Compile a
database of
4x4 vehicles
for
transportation
of people and
supplies
Procure backup generators

for critical
facilities
Establish
backup power
for warning
sirens
Goals and
Objects Satisfied
Goal: Create new
or revise existing
plans/maps for
Bond County
Objective:
Review and
update existing, or
create new,
community plans
and ordinances to
support hazard
mitigation.
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to new
and existing
infrastructure
Objective:
Minimize the
amount of
infrastructure
exposed to
hazards.
Goal: Create new
or revise existing
plans/maps for
Bond County
Objective:
Conduct new
studies/research
to profile hazards
and follow up with
mitigation
strategies.
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to
individuals and
infrastructure
Objective: Equip
public facilities
and communities
to guard against
damage caused
by secondary
effects of hazards.
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to
individuals and
infrastructure
Objective:
Evaluate and
strengthen the
communication
and transportation
abilities of
emergency
services
throughout the
county.
Hazards
Addressed
Subsidence
Jurisdiction
s Covered
Bond County
Winter Storm
Bond County
Winter Storm
Bond
County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Flood,
Tornado,
Earthquake,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Bond
County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Tornado,
Flood,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Mulberry
Grove,
Smithboro,
Sorento
Priority
Comments
Medium
The ESDA Director with assistance

from the county engineer will
oversee this project. The county will
seek assistance from IDNR. If
funding is available, implementation
will begin within three years.
Low

local power cooperatives or
companies for implementation of
this project. Funding has not been
secured as of 2009, but the PDM
program, ILDOT, or IEMA are
possibilities. If funding is available,
implementation will begin within five
years.
Low
The ESDA Director will oversee this

project and will work with local
resources and IDNR. Local
resources will be used to create and
maintain the database. If resources
are available, implementation will
Low
The ESDA Director will oversee the

implementation of this project.
Funding has not been secured as of
2009, but the pre-disaster mitigation
program and community
development grants are possible
funding sources. If funding is
available, this project is forecasted
to begin within five years.
Low
The ESDA Director oversees the

implementation of the project. Local
resources will be used to research
options for backup power. Additional
funding will be sought from other
funding sources, e.g. PDM program.
Implementation, if funding is
available, is forecasted to begin
within five years.
Page124

Mitigation
Item
Develop a
program to
distribute
weather radios
to all critical
facilities
Begin storm
sewer
construction
Goals and
Objects Satisfied
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to
individuals and
infrastructure
Objective: Equip
public facilities
and communities
to guard against
damage caused
by secondary
effects of hazards.
Goal: Lessen the
impacts of
hazards to new
and existing
infrastructure
Objective:
Minimize the
amount of
infrastructure
exposed to
hazards.
Hazards
Addressed
Jurisdictions
Covered
Flood,
Tornado,
Thunderstorm,
Winter Storm
Bond County,
Greenville,
Donnellson,
Mulberry
Grove, Old
Ripley,
Panama,
Pierron,
Pocahontas,
Smithboro,
Sorento )
Flood
Sorento
Priority
Comments
Low

implementation of this project. Local
resources will be used to determine
how many radios are needed and
when/where to distribute them.
Funding has not been secured as of
2009, but the PDM program and
community grants are an option.
Implementation, if funding is
available, will begin within five
years.
Low
The county engineer will work with

IDOT and IDNR to evaluate the
current conditions of the
communitys sewer system and
develop a plan. Funding has not
been secured as of 2009, but
county, state, and federal funding
will be sought. Implementation will
Following the prioritization exercises and recording the results, Dr. Remo advised that at
the next meeting we will review and discuss the preliminary draft of the plan and make
updates or corrections.
Meeting #5 will be held in late October at the Bond County Board Room.
Page125
Page126

Assembly of Bond County Planning Team, Review of Draft Plan: Meeting #5 :
Geology
Meeting Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2009, at 6:30 p.m.
Joe Rakers, Village of Old Ripley
Linda Hansen, Village of Sorento Board
Edward Wallace, President, Village of Sorento
Matt Willman, City of Greenville
Gerald McCray, Bond County Board, City of Greenville
Steve Plocher, Village of Pierron
Michael Knebel, Trustee, Village of Panama
Dolly Knebel, Village of Panama
Hiram Renfro, President, Village of Donnellson
Meeting was Called to order.
Dr. Remo of SIU-C explained the planning process thusfar, and described the method we
would use to review the draft copy of the plan. Linda Tragesser of Southwestern Illinois
Metropolitan and Regional Planning Commission provided everyone with a PDF copy of
the preliminary draft of the Bond County Plan prior to the meeting so that everyone could
review it. She acknowledged that the draft had been updated with information provided by
Dr. Remo of SIU-C subsequent to the circulation of the draft copies to the committee.
Page127

Committee members were asked to voice any opinions or suggest any corrections or
changes that need to be made in the plan. The following is a summary of the changes
needing to be made:
PLAN SECTION &
PAGE
Title Page
Table 1-1, P. 2
Table 2-1 P. 7
Table 2-2 P. 8
Section 3, Page 9
Section 3.3 P. 11
Section 3.5 P. 15
Section 3.5 P. 15
Section 3.5 P. 15
Section 3.5 P. 16
Section 3.5 P. 15
Section 3.5 P. 15
Section 4.4.2 Table 4-16 P. 38
Sect. 5.1.7 P. 88
Sect. 5 P. 95
Sect. 5 P. 95
Appendix A, Page 108
Repaginate after corrections
DESCRIPTION
CHANGE NEEDED
ESDA Coord data

Errors in Names & Titles
Errors in Names & Titles
Errors in Names, Titles, etc.
Historical Information
Demographics
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Industry
Dam Inventory
Building Codes
Table 5-6
Table 5-6
Minutes for 12/2/2008
Correct typos
Corrections & Updates
Correction & Updates
Corrections & Updates
Correct southeast to southwest
Correct Center to Institution
Correct Mallinkrodt to Covidien
Add Enertech
Correct to Greenville Livestock Inc
Buchheit Store
Add Loves Travel & Donnewald
Add Federal Correctional Inst.
Add Coleman-Panama Pond
Correct BOCA to Intl Building Code
Correct Ripson, Trestle, Smithboro
Add Proposed Senior Center
Correct Wednesday to Tuesday
Page128
Page129

Appendix B Articles Published by Local Newspapers
Page130
Page131

Appendix CAdopting Resolution
Page132

Appendix D Historical Hazards from NCDC
Page133

Location
or County
Bond
Bond
Bond
Pocahontas
Date
Time
Type
Mag
Dth
Inj
PrD
CrD
Description
12/2/1950
11/9/1984
5/12/1990
6/12/1998
1600
1645
1649
4:25
PM
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
Tornado
F3
F2
F1
F1
2
0
0
0
25
0
0
0
2.5M
2.5M
250K
0
0
0
0
0
Sorento
6/14/1998
5:16
PM
Tornado
F1
Greenville
5/12/2000
5:47
PM
Tornado
F2
Old Ripley
5/12/2000
5:25
PM
Tornado
F1
200K
None Reported
None Reported
None Reported
A tornado tracked east across open
farmland south of Pocahontas. A storm
chaser photographed the tornado which
grew to a large wedge shape at its peak.
However there was little evidence of
damage, except for a few trees down in
the area.
A damaging tornado occurred in Madison
and Bond counties in southwest Illinois,
starting about 615 pm in Madison County
just east of New Douglas and moving
east into Bond County. This tornado has
an almost continuous damage path of
nearly 6 miles and a maximum width of
150 yards. Four mobile homes in far
northwest Bond County near the Gilmore
community were destroyed with 4 people
suffering minor injuries. Two farm houses
sustained roof damage and 4 farm
implement buildings were also destroyed.
Numerous trees were also downed along
the path.
A second tornado formed about 100
yards southeast of the initial tornado in
Bond County and traveled east for about
1.5 miles. The tornado traveled through a
heavily wooded area destroying hundreds
of large trees.
A tornado left a path of damage for 9
miles across east Bond County. The
damage first started 2.5 miles north
northeast of Old Ripley where several
large trees were damaged. The tornado
traveled east alone County Road 1300
destroying one barn and 2 machine
sheds. The tornado continued east
snapping or uprooting large trees. It then
crossed Governor Bond Lake, damaging
at least 7 homes in the Springwood
Estates subdivision on the east side of
the lake. Large pieces from the side of
one home and pieces of the roof of
another were blown about 1/2 mile east.
Several pieces of debris were impaled
into the ground at 45 to 60 degree angles.
Page134

Location
or County
Date
Time
Type
Mag
Dth
Inj
PrD
CrD
Description
Greenville
5/1/2002
12:38
PM
Tornado
F1
Greenville
5/1/2002
12:38
PM
Tornado
F1
Greenville
5/1/2002
12:38
PM
Tornado
F1
Six tornadoes struck at virtually the same

time near Greenville, Illinois. Eye
witnesses reported seeing at least 4
tornadoes on the ground at the same
time. The tornadoes did not rotate around
each other. They each had distinctive
paths and moved rapidly east southeast.
The bulk of the damage was to barns,
grain bins, and other farm outbuildings
and to trees and power lines. Over 35
structures were damaged by the
tornadoes. The most significant damage
caused by tornado 1 was to the Hillview
Nursing Home which lost part of its roof.
No one was injured as the staff had
moved the residents to interior hallways.
The residents has to be transferred to
neighboring facilities due to the damage.
buildings were damaged by the
tornadoes. The most significant damage
caused by tornado 2 was to a rural
electric cooperative radio tower and to the
F&S Grain Storage Bins facility which
suffered major damage.
tornadoes. Tornado number 3 just missed
an automobile dealership, however it
caused significant damage to a barn, a
machine shed, and some damage to a
home. This tornado also crossed I-70 and
overturned a couple of tractor trailers.
One driver suffered minor injuries.
Page135
Location
or County
Date
Time
Type
Mag
Dth
Inj
PrD
CrD
Description
Greenville
5/1/2002
12:41
PM
Tornado
F1
Greenville
5/1/2002
12:42
PM
Tornado
F1
Greenville
5/1/2002
12:40
PM
Tornado
F0
Greenville
5/24/2006
4:40
PM
Tornado
50
kts.

tornadoes. Tornado number 5 crossed
US 40 just west of Dudlleyville Road and
caused tree damage and damage to a
home. The tornado also crossed I-70
overturning a couple of tractor trailers. A
total of 5 tractor trailers were overturned
by tornadoes 3 and 5.
A series of 6 tornadoes struck the
Greenville, Illinois area at virtually the
same time. Eyewitnesses reported seeing
at least 4 tornadoes on the ground at the
same time. The tornadoes were lined up
north to south and moved in distinct paths
to the east southeast. They did not rotate
around each other. The bulk of the
damage was to trees, power lines, and
farm outbuildings. Over 35 structures
were damaged by the tornadoes. Tornado
number 6 destroyed a garage and a
machine shed sending pieces of the
metal roof one-half mile to the east.
structures were
damage by
the
tornadoes. Tornado number 4 was the
weakest, reaching only F0 intensity. It
damaged trees and power lines and a few
farm outbuildings.
Several power lines were blown down 4
miles north of Greenville.
Page136
Location
or County
Date
Time
Type
Mag
Dth
Inj
PrD
CrD
Description
Greenville
5/24/2006
4:51
PM
Tornado
F0
Woburn
5/24/2006
4:53
PM
Tornado
F0
The first tornado touched down 5 miles

north of Greenville, southwest of the
intersection of Red Ball Trail and Hastings
Cemetery Avenue, just north of Peach
Avenue. It blew down several large trees.
Three of the trees fell onto a home
causing extensive damage. As it traveled
to the east it destroyed a machine shed
before lifting and dissipating. No injuries
were reported.
The second tornado touched down 1.4
miles northwest of Woburn along
Hastings Cemetery Avenue. The tornado
caused minor roof damage to one home.
Otherwise, most of the damage was to
trees before it lifted and dissipated. No
injuries were reported.
Page137

Appendix EHazard Map
Page138
Page139
Appendix FComplete List of Critical Facilities
Page140

Communication Facilities Report
ID
Name
Address
City
Class
Owner
WPRX645
200 HEALTHCARE DRIVE
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Edward A. Utlaut
WPRX646
403 S. SECOND
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Edward A. Utlaut
WQIW568
Greenville Airport-1374 sky ln.
GREENVIL
CDFLT
GREENVILLE
WQIW568
315 E COLLEGE AVE
GREENVIL
CDFLT
GREENVILLE
KB72218
GREENVIL
CDFLT
GREENVILLE FIRE
KB72218
404 S THIRD ST
GREENVIL
CDFLT
GREENVILLE FIRE
KB72218
1149 RED BUD TRAIL
GREENVIL
KD53940
WPZZ390
10
WPZZ390
CDFLT
GREENVILLE FIRE
CDFLT
GREENVILLE, CITY
GREENVIL
CDFLT
GREENVILLE, CITY
GREENVIL
CDFLT
GREENVILLE, CITY
New
CDFLT
I-WARN, Inc. /
New
CDFLT
I-WARN, Inc. /
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Illinois RSA 6 and 7
CDFLT
ILLINOIS WESTERN
KEYESPO
CDFLT
KEYESPORT FIRE
VANDALI
CDFLT
LB Tower Company
RD 1850 THEN N 300
Smithboro
CDFLT
MCC Holdings
BNSF Radio Bldg.
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Mid- Illinois
404 SOUTH 3RD STREET
11
WQBB433
12
WQBB433
13
KNKN996
14
WPJV612
R.R. 2, BOX 330
15
KNCR638
COR MULBERRY GROVE RD & RAILROAD
16
WHQ995
17
WPXV836
18
KYS246
19
WNUU673
705 STEPHENS ST
MULBERR
CDFLT
MULBERRY GROVE
20
WNUU673
1/4 MI W ON RT 140
MULBERR
CDFLT
MULBERRY GROVE
21
WPLE447
MULBERR
CDFLT
MULBERRY GROVE
22
WPLE447
MULBERR
CDFLT
MULBERRY GROVE
83 Mettlerville Lane
211 WOOD ST
23
KNKN479
1.5 MILES NORTH OF RT. 140 & 1/2 MI W OF
Mulberry
CDFLT
NEW CINGULAR
24
WPAH735
DONNELLSON AVE, .8KM WEST OF IL. RT
GREENVIL
CDFLT
PETRY, GAY
25
WPAH735
424 N SPRUCE
GREENVIL
CDFLT
PETRY, GAY
26
KNFL998
POCAHO
CDFLT
POCAHONTAS OLD
27
WPME895
OLD HWY 40 AT POCAHONTAS
GREENVIL
CDFLT
READY-VIEW
28
WPME895
1.4 MI S & W OF INTER. STATE RT 127
GREENVIL
CDFLT
READY-VIEW
29
WNZW323
CDFLT
SAINT LOUIS
30
KNEV229
SMITHBO
CDFLT
SCHEWE, MAURICE
31
WPUE322
3/4 MI N OF HOOKSDALE & 3 MI SE OF RT 12
KEYSPORT
CDFLT
SIEBERT, ELVERN
32
WPUE322
1615 3RD AVENUE
KEYSPORT
CDFLT
SIEBERT, ELVERN
33
WPRV622
SMITHBO
CDFLT
SMITHBORO FIRE
34
WPZZ802
SORENTO
CDFLT
SORENTO,
35
KSA325
36
WNTN647
37
KSL56
38
KNIV904
39
WPIC500
GREENVIL
CDFLT
SOUTHWESTERN
.75 MI W OF RT 127 ON RT 40
GREENVIL
CDFLT
SOUTHWESTERN
.75 MI W RT 127 ON RT 40
GREENVIL
CDFLT
SOUTHWESTERN
HWY 40 S ELM ST
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Southwestern
GREENVIL
CDFLT
State of Illinois
Page141

40
WPQH263
7.3 MI N & 1.8 MI E
41
WPQH263
2000 WOLF BUSINESS PARK
42
WPBB216
43
WPBB216
44
WNGV585
45
WPES869
46
WPES869
47
48
424 N SPRUCE
GREENVIL
CDFLT
UNITED
GREENVIL
CDFLT
UNITED
GREENVIL
CDFLT
WHITESIDE, DAVID
GREENVIL
CDFLT
WHITESIDE, DAVID
SORENTO
CDFLT
WHITESIDE, RON
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
WGEL CH 269
GREENVIL
CBR
BOND
WGRN CH 208
GREENVIL
CBR
GREENVILLE COL.
49
WNUX332
50
WNUX332
51
WNUX332
52
WQIY357
424 N SPRUCE
7 MI N OF MULBERRY GROVE
BNSF LS13 MP87.2 - HBD
MULBERR
CDFLT
BLANKENSHIP
MULBERR
CDFLT
BLANKENSHIP
MULBERR
CDFLT
BLANKENSHIP
Smithboro
CDFLT
BNSF Railway Co
53
WQIY357
Reno
CDFLT
BNSF Railway Co
54
WNRG515
RAILROAD MILEPOST 87.2 HBD 6 MI N
SMITHBO
CDFLT
BNSF Railway
55
WPWF403
BNSF MP 77.9 WIU
Sorento
CDFLT
BNSF Railway
56
KB63022
CDFLT
BOND CO
57
KXG822
58
WPNY502
VANDALIA RD AT ADMIN BLDG
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND COUNTY
WATER TWR @ NE COR OF SR 127 AND
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND MADISON
59
KSD589
403 SOUTH SECOND
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND, COUNTY OF
60
KSD589
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND, COUNTY OF
61
KSD589
62
KTG638
.7KM N OF US 140 ON RED BALL TRAIL
Greenville
CDFLT
BOND, COUNTY OF
1/4 MI N OF US RT 40 ON 3RD ST
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND, COUNTY OF
63
WPPC529
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND, COUNTY OF
64
WPSY980
GREENVIL
CDFLT
C - MAL INC
65
WNZZ506
US 40 & 127
66
KNHV205
CDFLT
CARLISLE SYNTEC
404 S THIRD ST
SMITHBO
CDFLT
CSX Transportation
67
KNHV205
W OF FRANKLIN ST & CR XING IN
SMITHBO
CDFLT
CSX Transportation
68
WPHZ699
MULBERR
CDFLT
CSX
404 S THIRD ST
69
WPHZ699
100 FT W OF CTY HWY 110 ON CR
POCAHO
CDFLT
CSX
70
WPPS589
50 FT SW OF CR 450 N CROSSING
GREENVIL
CDFLT
D & L DISPOSAL
71
WPPS589
900 WILLARD ST
GREENVIL
CDFLT
D & L DISPOSAL
72
WPLH679
JCT OF I70 & HWY 41
GREENVIL
CDFLT
DATATRONICS INC
73
WPOB855
GREENVIL
CDFLT
EDWARD A
74
WPOB855
GREENVIL
CDFLT
EDWARD A
75
KNAD257
GREENVIL
CDFLT
EDWARD A
76
KNAD257
GREENVIL
CDFLT
EDWARD A
77
WPRX644
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Edward A. Utlaut
78
WPIC224
SORENTO
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
79
WPIC224
SORENTO
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
80
WPIC225
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
SORENTO
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
81
WPIC225
82
WPKA626
.45N OF US140 ON RED BALL TRAIL
424 N SPRUCE
4 MI N OF OLD RIPLEY ON CR & 100 FT E
424 N SPRUCE
Page142

83
WPWS379
84
WPWS379
Sorento
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
85
WPZZ390
GREENVIL
CDFLT
GREENVILLE, CITY
86
KNCR638
KEYESPO
CDFLT
KEYESPORT FIRE
87
WNUK711
SMITHBO
CDFLT
MARCHELLO, J
88
KNKN479
89
WPSU972
90
WPXK839
91
WNTP529
Sorento
1420 Old Ripley Rd
12.0 MILES NW OF
2514 W. OLD NATIONAL TRAIL
.75 MI W RT 127 ON RT 40
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
Greenville
CDFLT
NEW CINGULAR
GREENVIL
CDFLT
NEXTEL LICENSE
Donnelso
CDFLT
PANAMA, VILLAGE
GREENVIL
CDFLT
SOUTHWESTERN
92
KNIV904
3/4 MI W RT 127 US 40
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Southwestern
93
WNVN842
SW EDGE OF GREENVILLE ON 4TH ST
NEW
CDFLT
THREE COUNTY
94
KFE380
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
95
KFE380
424 N SPRUCE
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
96
WNGV585
4 MI N OF OLD RIPLEY ON CR AND 100 FT E
SORENTO
CDFLT
WHITESIDE, RON
97
WQIY357
Hookdale
CDFLT
BNSF Railway Co
98
WPPC529
1149 RED BAL TRAIL
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND, COUNTY OF
99
WPLH679
GREENVIL
CDFLT
DATATRONICS INC
100
WPKA615
SORENTO
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
101
WPKA615
4 MI N OF OLD RIPLEY ON CR & 100 FEET E
SORENTO
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
102
WPKA617
424 N SPRUCE
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
103
WQAF623
424 N. SPRUCE
Greenville
CDFLT
Greenville Airport
104
WPZZ390
INT OF S. ELM AND I-70
GREENVIL
CDFLT
GREENVILLE, CITY
105
WPSU972
804 S. 7th St.
GREENVIL
CDFLT
NEXTEL LICENSE
106
WDID 1510
HIGHLAN
CBR
NEW LIFE
107
KNGK566
R 1 4 1/2 MI S
DONNELL
CDFLT
BAUMBERGER,
108
WQIY357
Smithboro
CDFLT
BNSF Railway Co
109
WYK623
BNSF RADIO BLDG
SMITHBO
CDFLT
BNSF Railway
110
WLD716
309 W MAIN
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND
111
KXG822
GREENVIL
CDFLT
BOND COUNTY
112
WPTL203
113
WPOB855
114
WPKA617
115
WPKA626
424 NORTH SPRUCE
4 MI N OF OLD RIPLEY ON CR & 100 FEET E
GREENVIL
CDFLT
CLINTON COUNTY
GREENVIL
CDFLT
EDWARD A
GREENVIL
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
SORENTO
CDFLT
Whiteside, Ron
Airport Facilities Report

ID
Name
GREENVILLE
NANCE
Address
City
Class
Function
1374 SKY LANE
GREENVILLE
ADFL
Public
443 IL RT 140
OLD RIPLEY
ADFL
Private
Page143

Dams Report
Height
(ft)
ID
Name
River
City
Owner
Purpose
SORENTO RESERVOIR DAM
TRIB SHOAL CREEK
POCAHONTAS
Village of Sorento
27
GREENVILLE NEW CITY DAM
KINGSBURY BRANCH SHOAL
GREENVILLE
City of Greenville
SR
40
BOND CHRISTIAN CAMP LAKE DAM
TRIB HURRICANE CREEK
KEYESPORT
Bond County Christian
19
GREENVILLE ROD AND GUN CLUB
TRIB EAST BRANCH SHOAL
GREENVILLE
Greenville Rod & Gun
19
GREENVILLE OLD CITY LAKE DAM
EAST FORK SHOAL CREEK-
GREENVILLE
Kingsbury Park District
30
STONE POND DAM
TRIB HURRICANE CREEK
KEYESPORT
Royal Lake
31
ARMSTRONG POND DAM
TRIB AVERY BRANCH
PLEASANT
Benjamin Armstrong
26
RINDERER POND DAM #1
W. TRIB-LITTLE SHOAL CREEK
GREENVILLE
FRANCIS RINDERER
IP
30
POTTHAST POND DAM #1
W. TRIB-SHOAL CREEK
JAMESTOWN
CLARENCE POTTHAST
PO
22
10
BROWN POND DAM #1
W. TRIB-SHOAL CREEK
JAMESTOWN
TOM BROWN JR.
RFO
22
EOC Facilities Report

ID
Name
Address
City
Class
Greenville Civil Defense Ctr
404 S 3rd St
Greenville
EFEO
FireStation Facilities Report

ID
Name
Address
City
Class
Mulberry Grove Fire Dept
1897 US Rt 40
Mulberry Grove
EFFS
Stories
1
YearBuilt
666
Smithboro Fire Dept
305 S 3rd
Smithboro
EFFS
666
Pocahontas Fire House
4 W State St
Pocahontas
EFFS
666
Greenville Fire Dept
1110 E Harris
Greenville
EFFS
666
Keyesport Fire Dept
901 Mulberry St
Keyesport
EFFS
666
Shoal Creek Fire Protection
101 N. Main St
Sorento
EFFS
666
Highland-Pierron
223 IL RT 143
Pirron
EFFS
1999
Old Ripley Fire Dept
1003 N Main St
Old Ripley
EFFS
666
ReplaCost
Page144
650

Hazardous Materials Report
ID
Name
Address
City
Class
EPAID
ChemicalName
MALLINCKRODT INC.
100 LOUIS LATZER DR.
GREENVILLE
HDFLT
ILD006327704
ZINC COMPOUNDS
CARLISLE SYNTEC INC.
1825 E. U.S. RTE. 40
GREENVILLE
HDFLT
ILD980503304
THIRAM
1825 E. U.S. RTE. 40
GREENVILLE
HDFLT
ILD980503304
2-
1825 E. U.S. RTE. 40
GREENVILLE
HDFLT
ILD980503304
ZINC COMPOUNDS
1825 E. U.S. RTE. 40
GREENVILLE
HDFLT
ILD980503304
ANTIMONY
D&L Dissposal, LLC
900 Willard
GREENVILLE
HDFLT
Federal Correctinal Inst
100 US RT 40
GREENVILLE
HDFLT
Ferrellgas
805 Hillview Ave
GREENVILLE
HDFLT
Greenville Regional Hospital
200 Healthcare Dr
Greenville
HDFLT
10
Greevnill Service Co
520 Franklin St
Greenville
HDFLT
11
Kern's Ag Services
612 S Maple St
Mulberry Grove
HDFLT
12
Southern Central FS Inc
822 S 2nd St
Greenville
HDFLT
13
Southwest Electric Corps Inc
525 US 40
Greenville
HDFLT
14
Top Ag, Inc
820 Pacatte St
Pierron
HDFLT
15
Woolsey Bros Farm Supply
601 Ridge Ave
Greenville
HDFLT
Medical Care Facilities Report
ID
Name
Address
City
Class
Function
Beds
EDWARD A UTLAUT MEM
200 HEALTH CARE DRIVE
GREENVILLE
EFHL
Hospital
188
Brauns Terrace
1115 East Washington Street
GREENVILLE
EFHS
Nursing
16
Cardinal Hill Healthcare
400 East Hillview Avenue
GREENVILLE
EFHM
Nursing
90
Fair Oaks
200 Health Care Drive
GREENVILLE
EFHL
Nursing
108
Stories
15540
Police Station Facilities Report

ID
Name
Address
City
Class
Bond County Sheriff
403 S 2nd St
Greenville
EFPS
Greenville Police Dept
404 S 3rd St
Greenville
EFPS
Pocahontas
101 Kavanaugh
Pocahontas
Stories
PDFLT 1
Potable Water Facilities Report

ID Name
Address
City
1 SORENTO WTP
1/4 MILE S. COUNTY HWY 18
SORENTO
2 GREENVILLE WTP, CITY OF
1261 WATER PLANT ROAD
Greenville
Repla
Cost
Class
36963
Page145
School Facilities Report

ID
Name
Address
City
Class
Students
GREENVILLE ELEM SCHOOL
800 N DEWEY
GREENVILLE
EFS1
605
Greenville High School
GREENVILLE
EFS1
581
GREENVILLE JR HIGH SCHOOL
1000 E. State Rte. 140

1200 Junior High
Drive
GREENVILLE
EFS1
302
Pochontas Elementary School
4 State Stree
Pocahontas
EFS1
238
Sorento Elementary School
510 S. Main Street
Sorento
EFS1
173
Greenville College
315 E. College Ave.
EFS2
Mulberry Grove Jr. / Sr. High
801 W Wall
EFS1
197
Mulbery Grove Elementary
801 W Wall
Greenville
Mulberry
Grove
Mulberry
Grove
EFS1
259
Metro Christian Academy
1654 Elevator Road
Sorento
EFS1
30
User Defined Facilities Report

ID Name
Address
City
MulberryGrove Municipal Building
205 N Wood St
Mulberry Grove
Village Hall
Smithboro Village Hall
202 S Main St
Smithboro
Village Hall
Federal Correctional Institution
100 US Hwy40 & 4th
Greenville
Class
Function
WasteWater Facilities Report

ID Name
Address
City
Function
GATEWAY RETREAT
1391 WOBURN ROAD
GREENVILLE
SPORTING A
CDFLT
GREENVILLE SEWAGE
1200 S ELM ST
GREENVILLE
SEWAGE TRE
CDFLT
MULBERRY GROVE SD
1993 US RT 140
MULBERRY GROVE
SEWAGE TRE
CDFLT
PIERRON EAST STP
EAST OF BARNHARDT STREET PIERRON
SEWAGE TRE
CDFLT
PIERRON WEST STP
830 Main St
PIERRON
SEWAGE TRE
CDFLT
POCAHONTAS STP,
801 Leverton St
POCAHONTAS
SEWAGE TRE
CDFLT
SORENTO STP, VILLAGE
Sanderson St
SORENTO
SEWAGE TRE
CDFLT
Panama STP
9200 Donnellson Ave
Panama
SEWAGE TRE
CDFLT
Class
Page146
Appendix GMap of Critical Facilities
Page147
Page148
Appendix HRecorded NOAA Flood Data: USGS Stream Gauge

Data
Appendix H Top ten flood flows from the USGS Stream Gauge Data
County
Station
River
Period of Record
Latitude
Longitude
Bond County
Near Pierron, IL
Shoal Creek
1995-2007
384633
892956
Discharge
(cfs)
24,000
21,200
17,700
12,800
12,700
11,100
9,040
9,010
6,690
6,600
Montgomery County
Near Coffeen, IL
Shoal Creek
1964-2007
384633
892956
Discharge
(cfs)
5,910
5,680
5,170
5,030
4,630
4,530
3,600
3,410
3,140
3,110
St Clair
Near New Athens, IL
Kaskaskia River
1908-1971
381911
895319
05/23/1943
08/19/1946
05/13/1961
08/26/1915
05/11/1908
01/10/1950
03/30/1913
02/03/1916
06/20/1957
04/05/1938
Discharge
(cfs)
83,000
71,700
66,600
63,100
62,800
60,200
56,600
54,800
48,700
44,000
Page149
Rank
Date
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
05/08/2002
01/06/2005
05/19/1995
04/30/1996
05/29/2004
02/08/1999
03/22/1998
02/28/1997
08/26/2000
05/11/2003
Date
12/07/1966
05/07/2002
05/26/1990
08/05/1998
10/12/1969
04/11/1979
07/20/1982
12/29/1990
01/05/2005
12/11/1985
Year

Multihazard Mitigation Plan Bond County Illinois

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Multihazard Mitigation Plan Bond County Illinois

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Multihazard Mitigation Plan Bond County Illinois

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hazard Mitigation Plan

Bond County, Illinois

Adoption Date: -- _______________________ -Primary Point of Contact

Secondary Point of Contact

BOND COUNTY OFFICIALS

Joe Whalen, Vice Chair

REGIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS

4.1.3 Hazard Summary

5.1.6 Land Use Plan

Minutes of the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Meetings

Articles published by Local Newspaper

Historical Hazards from NCDC

Complete List of Critical Facilities

Map of Critical Facilities

Recorded NOAA Flood Data: USGS Stream Gauge Data

Bond County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Bond County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Southwestern Illinois Metropolitan and

Southwestern Illinois Region

Southwestern Illinois Metropolitan and

Southwestern Illinois Region

County 911 Board

Bond County Board

Greenville Regional Hospital EMS,

Keyesport Fire Protection District

Village of Mulberry Grove

Highland-Pierron Fire Protection District

Pocahontas-Old Ripley Fire & EMS

Village of Old Ripley

Smithboro Fire Protection District

Attending the MHMP meetings

Bond County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Development of a Mitigation Plan

Implementation of the Plan and the Monitoring of Programs

December 2, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.

Bond County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Clinton County ESDA Coordinator

Madison County Planning and

Fayette County LEPC

Montgomery County LEPC

East West Gateway Council

Director of Community Planning

1.5 Review of Technical and Fiscal Resources

Bond County Hazard Mitigation Plan

United States Geological Survey

1.6 Review of Existing Plans

Bond County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Lists economic and community

Mitigation strategies from

Bond County Future

Comprehensive plan for land

Sections related to hazards

This codebook includes

These ordinances were

Comprehensive plan for land

Sections related to hazards

Land Use Regulations

Sections related to hazards

Land Use and Subdividing