The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Garingarao for acts of lasciviousness and violation of RA 7610. AAA, a 16-year old patient, accused Garingarao, a nurse on duty, of sexually abusing her by fondling her breasts and inserting his fingers into her vagina. The trial court found Garingarao guilty beyond reasonable doubt based on AAA's credible testimony. The Court of Appeals and Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that even a single act of lasciviousness against a minor under the age of 18 is sufficient to constitute sexual abuse under RA 7610.
The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Garingarao for acts of lasciviousness and violation of RA 7610. AAA, a 16-year old patient, accused Garingarao, a nurse on duty, of sexually abusing her by fondling her breasts and inserting his fingers into her vagina. The trial court found Garingarao guilty beyond reasonable doubt based on AAA's credible testimony. The Court of Appeals and Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that even a single act of lasciviousness against a minor under the age of 18 is sufficient to constitute sexual abuse under RA 7610.
The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Garingarao for acts of lasciviousness and violation of RA 7610. AAA, a 16-year old patient, accused Garingarao, a nurse on duty, of sexually abusing her by fondling her breasts and inserting his fingers into her vagina. The trial court found Garingarao guilty beyond reasonable doubt based on AAA's credible testimony. The Court of Appeals and Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that even a single act of lasciviousness against a minor under the age of 18 is sufficient to constitute sexual abuse under RA 7610.
The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Garingarao for acts of lasciviousness and violation of RA 7610. AAA, a 16-year old patient, accused Garingarao, a nurse on duty, of sexually abusing her by fondling her breasts and inserting his fingers into her vagina. The trial court found Garingarao guilty beyond reasonable doubt based on AAA's credible testimony. The Court of Appeals and Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that even a single act of lasciviousness against a minor under the age of 18 is sufficient to constitute sexual abuse under RA 7610.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Unts Digests 1
Case Title: Garingarao v People
Reference No.: GR No. 192760
W/N the CA committed a reversible error in affirming with
modifications the trial courts decision HELD:
Q:
FACTS:
AAA was brought to the Virgen Milagrosa Medical Center by
her father BBB and mother CCC due to fever and abdominal pain o o
In the morning, BBB and CCC left to attend to his
office and CCC to the family store When they returned AAA said that she wanted to go home; she was permitted by Dr. Morante to be discharged from the hospital with instructions that she should continue her medications
Uon coming home AAA revealed that Garingao (nurse on
duty that day) sexually abused herhe foundled her breasts, inserted his fingers into her vagina
Garingao made the defense that the crime charged against
him was fabricated because of a heated argument with the victims father
The RTC found Garingao guilty beyond reasonable doubt of
the crime of acts of lasciviousness in relation to RA 7610 o
ISSUE/S:
Garingarao insists that it was physically impossible for him
to commit the acts charged against him because there were many patients and hospital employees around o He further alleges that assuming the charges were correct, there was only once incident when he allegedly touched AAA and as such, he should have been convicted only of acts of lasciviousness and not of violation of RA 7610 Court has ruled that in cases of acts of lasciviousness the lone testimony of the offended party, if credible, is sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused o Also, denial and alibi are considered weak defenses against the positive identification by the victim Elements of Sexual Abuse under Section 5, Article III of RA 7610: o Accused commits the act of sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct o Said act is performed with a child exploited in prostitution or subjected to other sexual abuse; and o The child, whether male or female, is below 18 years of age Lascivious Conduct (Section 32, Article XIII of the IRR of RA 7610) o
He appealed the decision, however the CA ruled
that Garingao should be convicted under RA 7610 because AAA was 16 years old when the crime was committed; according to the CA the offender shall be charged with rape or lascivious conduct under the RPC only if the victim is below 12 years old, otherwise the provisions of RA 7610 shall prevail
The intentional touching, either directly or through
clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks, or the introduction of any object into the genitalia, anus or mouth, of any person, whether of the same or opposite sex, with the intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person, bestiality, masturbation, lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of a person
Prosecution was able to establish that Garingarao touched
AAAs breasts and inserted his finger into her private part for his sexual gratificationhe used his influence as a
Unts Digests 2
nurse by pretending that his actions were part of the
physical examination he was doing A child is deemed subject to other sexual abuse when the child is the victim of lascivious conduct under the coercion or influence of any adultthere must be some form of compulsion equivalent to intimidation which subdues the free exercise of the offended partys free will o Garingarao coerced AAA into submitting to his lascivious acts by pretending that he was examining her
ON THE INCIDENT ONLY HAPPENING ONCE
Section 3(b) of RA 7610 provides that the abuse may be
habitual or not o The fact that the offense occurred only once is enough to hold Garingarao liable for acts of lasciviousness under RA 7610