1

Effects of non-uniform pollution on the AC flashover performance of suspension

insulators

Zhijin ZHANG, Jiayao ZHAO, Dongdong ZHANG, Xingliang JIANG,

<Zhijin ZHANG, Jiayao ZHAO, Dongdong ZHANG, Xingliang JIANG are with the State

Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology,

Chongqing University, 400044, Chongqing, P.R. China (Corresponding author: Dr.

Dongdong Zhang, e-mail: [email protected]; Tel: + 8615696154801;)>

AbstractThe non-uniform distribution of contamination on insulator surface has

appreciable effects on flashover voltage, and the corresponding researches are valuable for

10

the better selection of outdoor insulation. In this paper, two typical types of porcelain and

11

glass insulators which are widely used in ac lines were taken as the research subjects, and

12

their corrections of AC flashover voltage under non-uniform pollution were studied. Besides,

13

their flashover characteristics under different ratio (T/B) of top to bottom surface salt deposit

14

density (SDD) were investigated, including the analysis of flashover voltage, surface

15

pollution layer conductivity and critical leakage current. Test results gave the modified

16

formulas for predicting flashover voltage of the two samples, which can be directly applied

17

in the transmission line design. Also, the analysis delivered that, the basic reason why the

18

flashover voltage increases with the decrease of T/B, is due to the decrease of equivalent

19

surface conductivity of the whole surface and the decrease of critical leakage current. This

20

research will be of certain value in providing references for outdoor insulation selection, as

21

well as in proposing more information for revealing pollution flashover mechanism.

22

Keywordsinsulator, salt deposit density, non-uniform pollution, flashover voltage,

23

surface layer conductivity, critical leakage current

24

1. Introduction

25

In recent years, along with the rapid development of industry and economy, the air quality

26

is getting worse, and the accident caused by pollution flashover occurs from time to time in

27

China and around the world. These pollution flashovers may cause large-scale blackouts

28

accident of the grid system [1], [2]. Given this, plenty of studies on the pollution flashover

29

performance and mechanism have been done in many countries [3].

30

The pollution accumulation experiments of field operating insulators delivered that the

31

contamination on insulators in service is always non-uniform. Thus some researches were

32

conducted to discuss the performance of non-uniform contamination on top and bottom

33

surfaces, as well as its influence on insulator flashover [4-16].

34

For example, according to the dc operation experience in China, researchers in [8] found

35

that, for porcelain and glass insulator, the contamination ratio (T/B) of top to bottom surface

36

of porcelain and glass insulators is generally in range of 1:5 - 1:10; test results in [10]

37

indicated that, under non-uniform pollution on top and bottom surface, the pollution

38

withstand voltage increases by 30% and 50% respectively when T/B is 1:5 and 1:10; EPRI

39

[11] raised a formula,

40

U2
T
1 C log
U1
B

(1)

41

for the correction of dc flashover voltage under non-uniform pollution, and got that the

42

correction coefficient (C) was in the range of 0.29 - 0.47; in [12], another research found that

43

the formula of EPRI is also applicable in ac case and the value of C was obtained as 0.31.

44

Some works of the non-uniform pollution have been done around the world, and the related

45

data in specific to certain kinds of insulators were referable in outdoor insulation design.

46

However, their results are of some discrepancy. For example, in [10], the value of C for

47

ceramic insulators ranges from 0.24 to 0.29 and for glass insulators it ranges from 0.18 to

48

0.20, while in [12], the correction coefficient C for ceramic insulators is in the range of 0.21

49

- 0.37. Therefore, more tests were needed to provide detailed information for the selection of

50

correction coefficient. Also, the data of surface pollution layer conductivity as well as the

51

critical leakage current, are necessary for better understand insulator flashover performance

52

under non-uniform pollution.

53

Given this, ac pollution flashover performance of two typical types of porcelain and glass

54

insulators, which are mostly used in the 110 kV, 220 kV and 500 kV ac transmission lines in

55

China, were studied in this paper, and the influence of non-uniform pollution distribution

56

was systematically analyzed. Modified formulas for the two typical insulators were proposed,

57

which are directly referable for outdoor insulation design. Research results are of certain

58

value in providing references for engineering practice, as well as in proposing more

59

information for revealing pollution flashover mechanism.

60

2. Insulator Samples, Experimental Setup and Procedures

61

2.1. Insulator Samples

62

The samples were two typical types of suspension insulators. The technical parameters and

63

profiles of the samples are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, in which H is the configuration

64

height, L is the leakage distance and D is the diameter of insulators.

65

2.2. Experimental Setups

66

The tests were carried out in the multi-function artificial climate chamber. The artificial

67

climate chamber, with a diameter of 7.8 m and a height of 11.6 m, can simulate complex

68

atmospheric environments such as fog, rain, ice and high altitude [13-16]. The power was

69

supplied by the AC voltage test set (YDTW) - 500 kV/ 2000 kVA pollution test transformer,

70

of which the maximum short current is 75 A. The applied voltage on test samples was

71

supplied by a 50 Hz AC power. The tested circuit was shown in Figure 2, where B is the

72

voltage regulator, T is the test transformer, R0 is the protective resistance (10K ohms), H is a

73

330 kV wall bushing, F is the capacitive voltage divider with attenuation ratio 100000:1, E is

74

the climate chamber, C is the leakage current measurement system and S is the sample. The

75

setups meet the requirements of pollution flashover test [17-18].

76

2.3. Test Procedures

77

2.3.1. Preparation

78

Before the tests, all the samples were carefully cleaned by Na2PO3 solution so that all

79

traces of dirt and grease were removed. Then the samples were thoroughly rinsed with tap

80

water, and let to dry naturally indoor to avoid dust or other pollution.

81

2.3.2. Pollution

82

The soluble contaminants were calculated by soluble deposit density (SDD). SDD

83

represents the weight of soluble materials per unit area of insulator, in mg/cm2. And

84

non-soluble materials were still calculated by non-soluble deposit density (NSDD). SDD was

85

selected for 0.06, 0.10 and 0.25 mg/cm2 to represent three different levels of pollution. The

86

ratio of NSDD to SDD was 3.5 in all the tests. The contamination ratio (T/B) of top to bottom

87

surface of porcelain and glass insulators was generally selected for 1: 1, 1 3, 1 5, 1 8 and 1

88

15 to represent five different degrees of pollution.

89

The insulators were polluted by solid layer method using brush. The tests used NaCl to

90

represent soluble contaminant, and used Kieselguhr to represent non-soluble contaminant.

91

The mathematic relationship between soluble deposit density of top and bottom surface

92

(SDDT/SDDB) and the average soluble deposit density (SDD) of the porcelain and glass

93

insulators can be expressed as follows:

SDD
ST S B

T SDDT
B SDDB

94

95

where ST, SB are the area of top and bottom surface of the porcelain and glass insulators.

96

2.3.3. Wetting

(2)

97

Natural drying of the samples was ensured to be sufficient. Then the samples were

98

suspended into the climate chamber. The polluted insulators were wetted by steam fog which

99

was generated by a 1.5 t/h boiler. The fog input rate was 0.05 0.01 kg/hm3, and the

100

temperature in the chamber was controlled between 30 C and 35 C through the refrigeration

101

system and the atmospheric pressure is 98.6 kPa in all the experiments.

102

2.3.4. Flashover Test

103

The flashover tests were carried out immediately the pollution layer was completely wet.

104

In the tests, up and down method was adopted [17-18]. Each contaminated sample was

105

subjected to at least 15 valid individual tests. The voltage step was approximately 5% of

106

the expected U50. The first valid individual test was selected as being the first one that

107

yields a result different from the preceding ones. Only the individual test and at least 14

108

following individual tests were taken as useful tests to determine U50. The U50 and relative

109

standard deviation error () are calculated as follows:

110

111

(U i ni )
N

N
2
U i U 50
i 1

U 50

(3)

N 1
100%

(4)

112

where Ui is an applied voltage level, ni is the number of tests carried out at the same applied

113

voltage Ui, and N is the total number of valid tests.

114

3. Test Results and Analysis

115

3.1. AC Flashover Voltage Results

116

Following the procedures above, ac flashover tests of 7-unit insulator strings polluted

117

under different SDD and the contamination ratio (T/B) of top to bottom surface were carried

118

out. The results are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.

119

From the test results, conclusions can be made as follows:

120

(1) The relative standard deviations of these results are all less than 8%, which means that

121

the dispersion of the test results is slight.

122

(2) The flashover voltage of insulator string decreases with the increase of SDD under a

123

certain value of T/B. Take B-type insulator string for example, when T/B = 1:3, the value of

124

SDD is 0.06, 0.10 and 0.25 mg/cm2, the corresponding U50 is 116.5 kV, 93.2 kV and 69.2 kV

125

respectively, which means that the voltage decreases by 20.0% and 40.6% when the SDD

126

increases from 0.06 to 0.10 and 0.25 mg/cm2 correspondingly.

127

(3) U50 was remarkably affected by the contamination ratio (T/B) of top to bottom surface

128

of insulator, and the lower the T/B ratio, the higher the U50 of insulator strings. Take A-type

129

insulator string for example: when SDD is 0.10 mg/cm2, and the T/B ratio changes from 1/1,

130

1/3, 1/5, 1/8 to 1/15 respectively, the U50 is 90.8 kV, 98.9 kV, 105.7 kV, 110.3 kV and 118.1

131

kV correspondingly. The data shows that when the T/B ratio decreases from 1/1 to 1/3, 1/5,

132

1/8 and 1/15, the U50 will increase by 7.7%, 15.1%, 20.2% and 28.6% correspondingly.

133

3.2. Relationship Between T/B and SPLC

134

The non-uniformity T/B on the top and bottom surface of insulators affects its pollution

135

flashover voltage, and the relationship between them is shown in Figure 3. It can be seen

136

from Figure 3 that the AC flashover voltage grows with the decreases of T/B.

137

Eq. (2) shows that, when T/B < 1, SDDB > SDD and SDDT < SDD. The top and bottom

138

surface of the samples were all uniformly coated with NaCl in the tests, so their surface

139

pollution layer conductivity (SPLC) is directly proportional to SDD when they are at the

140

same temperature and saturated sufficiently [12]. In other words, an increase of T/B causes

141

the layer conductivity of insulator top surface to decrease, and the bottom surface vice versa.

142

The relationship between the shape factor of insulator (f), the conductivity of pollution

143

144

layer (), the surface conductance (G) and the resistance of pollution layer (R) satisfy [19]:

f G

1
f
R

(5)

145

The resistance of the whole surface pollution layer consists of the resistance of the top

146

surface in series with that of the bottom surface. Thus from Eq. (5), the equivalent

147

conductivity of the whole insulator surface (eq_non) can be obtained:

eq_non

f
fT

148

fB

(6)

149

where T is the conductivity of top surface and B is that of bottom surface. The shape factor (f)

150

and the profile of the insulators can be expressed by [20]:

f 0
D(l )

f f f

T
B

151

(7)

152

where L is the insulator surface creepage distance, dl is the increment of creepage distance,

153

D(l) represents the diameter at distance dl, fT and fB is the shape factor of the top and bottom

154

surface of insulator respectively, f is the total shape factor of insulator.

155

Since the conductivity of pollution layer () is proportional to SDD, according to Eq. (2),

156

(5), (7) and (8), the ratio (K) of the equivalent conductivity (eq_non) of the whole insulator

157

surface under non-uniform pollution distribution to the surface conductivity (eq_uni) with

158

uniform pollution distribution can be expressed by the function of SDD, SDDT and SDDB:

159

eq_non
f SDDT SDDB

eq_uni SDD ( f B SDDT fT SDDB )

(8)

160

Following Standard [20] and the insulator structure in Table 1, the related technical

161

parameters of the samples can be calculated. For A-type insulator, f, fT and fB are 0.748, 0.203

162

and 0.545 respectively, while For B-type insulator, they are 0.702, 0.210 and 0.492

163

correspondingly.

164

With Eq. (8) and the values of f, fT and fB, the ratio K can be calculated as shown in Table 4.

165

It can be seen that the mean pollution surface conductivity along the whole surface of

166

insulator will get smaller if the non-uniformity of the pollution distribution between the top

167

and bottom surfaces increases. For example, when T/B is 1/3, 1/5, 1/8 and 1/15 respectively,

168

the K of A-type insulator is 0.859, 0.680, 0.509 and 0.318 correspondingly, which means that

169

the comprehensive function of non-uniform pollution is to make the mean conductivity of

170

the whole surface pollution layer decrease with the decrease of T/B. Therefore, under the

171

same applied voltage, the leakage current may decrease with the decrease of T/B, making the

172

dry band more difficult to appear on the pollution layer.

173

3.3. Relationship Between T/B and Icr

174

Leakage current is an important parameter of electrical property test, which contains the

175

information of insulators operational status. In this paper, the leakage current just before

176

flashover, namely the critical leakage current ICR, was selected as the characteristic

177

parameter of discharge process, and the influence of T/B on ICR was analyzed. Figure 4 shows

178

the waveform of leakage current during the flashover process. Generally, the peak value at

179

the first half cycle before flashover is defined as critical leakage current ICR, as is marked in

180

Figure 4. During the test, ICR of each flashover test were recorded, and the mean values

181

corresponding to each pollution condition were calculated and shown in Figure 5.

182

It can be indicated from Figure 5 that, under a certain SDD, ICR decreases with the decrease

183

of T/B. Take A-type insulator for example, when SDD 0.06mg/cm2, T/B= 1:1, the critical

184

leakage current values is 0.595mA, 0.526 mA, 0.507 mA, 0.489 mA and 0.478 mA

185

respectively when T/B decreases from 1/1,1/3, 1/5, 1/8 to 1/15. The change of ICR is also due

186

to the influence of non-uniform pollution layer on the mean conductivity of the whole

187

surface pollution layer.

10

188
189
190

From the mathematic flashover model in [21], the basic equation to maintain the AC arc
along the polluted insulator can be expressed as follows:

U m U arc _ m U p _ m AxI m

ra ( L x) I m

(9)

191

where Um and Im are the peak value of the applied voltage and the leakage current; Uarc_m is

192

the voltage on the arc; Up_m is the voltage on the residual pollution resistance. A and n are the

193

arc constant; L is the total creepage distance; x is the length of the arc; ra is the residual

194

pollution resistance per unit length.

195

Moreover, the partial arc propagation criterion is [22]:

E p Earc

196

(10)

197

where Ep is voltage gradient of the residual contaminated parts, Earc is arc gradient. Ep and

198

Earc can be expressed as [22]:

199

200

Ep

Up_m

Earc

Lx

U arc _ m
x

ra ( L x) I m
ra I m
Lx

(11)

AI x
n
m
AI m
x

(12)

201

According to the Eq. (11) and (12), the lower value of leakage current, the harder the

202

Inequality (10) can be satisfied. It makes the partial arc propagation on the surface of

203

polluted insulator difficult. Therefore for the insulator with lower T/B, the arc propagation

204

criterion is hard to be satisfied, the applied voltage should be increased to increase the

205

leakage current and satisfy the arc propagation criterion.

206

4. Flashover Voltage Correction under Non-uniform Pollution

11

207

The relationship between U50 and SDD under different T/B can be indicated from the test

208

data, as is shown in Figure 6. This figure shows that under a certain T/B, insulator strings

209

flashover voltage U50 decreases with the increase of SDD.

210

Insulator flashover voltage and salt deposit density meet negative exponent function:

211

U 50 a SDD b

(13)

212

where a is a coefficient associated with insulator profile and environment conditions, b is

213

characteristic exponent characterizing the influence of SDD on U50.

214

Therefore, through fitting the curves in Figure 6 by Eq. (13), the coefficient a, the influence

215

characteristic exponent b and the fitting degree R2 of each sample in each T/B condition can

216

be obtained, as shown in Table 5 and Table 6.

217

The fitting results reveal that the influence of T/B and SDD on ac flashover voltage should

218

be independent. Take B-type insulator for example, the b values are 0.369, 0.360, 0.369,

219

0.358 and 0.369 respectively when T/B are 1/1, 1/3, 1/5, 1/8 to 1/15 correspondingly, and the

220

mean value of b is 0.365. The relative errors between the b values and its mean value are just

221

within 1.10% and - 1.92%, which are very small, so the influence of T/B on b is not obvious.

222

In other words, b can be treated as a constant though T/B is changing. Therefore, the

223

functions of T/B and SDD on U50 can be seen to be independent. According to Eq. (1) and

224

(13), the calculation of U50 under non-uniform pollution can be expressed as follows:

225

U 50 a SDD b [1 C log(T / B)]

(14)

226

Some mathematical methods and the fitting analysis based on Eq. (14) were adopted for

227

the test data in Table 2 and 3, and then the equations for predicting the U50 of A-type and

228

B-type insulators can be got:

12

229

U 50 46.98 SDD 0.280 [1 0.271 log(T / B)]

TypeA

(15)

230

U50 33.46 SDD0.365 [1 0.501 log(T / B)]

TypeB

(16)

231

Define the calculating error as:

232

U fT U fC
U fT

100%

(17)

233

where UfT is the test value of U50 while UfC is its calculated value using Eq. (15) and (16).

234

U(%) corresponding to each pollution condition can be calculated, as shown in Table 7.

235

It can be inferred from the table that by using Eq. (15) and (16) to calculate the U50, the

236

relative error are all within 3%, which suggests that the two equations for predicting

237

flashover voltage under different T/B and SDD values are acceptable.

238

5 Conclusion

239
240
241
242
243
244

In this paper, the flashover performance of typical type insulators under non-uniform
pollution was studied. Through analysis the following conclusions can be obtained:
(1) Both salt deposit density SDD and pollution non-uniformity T/B of insulator have
obvious effects on flashover voltage, and their effects are independent from each other.
(2) The relationship among the ac pollution flashover voltage (U50), SDD and T/B of
insulator string meets:

245

U 50 a SDD b [1 C log(T / B)]

246

For the two typical types of porcelain and glass insulators, the prediction of U50 can be

247
248

made by:

U 50 46.98 SDD 0.280 [1 0.271 log(T / B)]

TypeA

13

249

U50 33.46 SDD0.365 [1 0.501 log(T / B)]

TypeB

250

(3) The non-uniformly distribution of pollution layer on top and bottom surfaces of

251

insulator string causes the decrease of equivalent conductivity of the whole surface. The

252

more uneven the pollution distribution on the top and bottom surface of insulators, the

253

smaller the mean pollution surface conductivity along the whole surface of insulators. In that

254

case, the leakage current is lowered, which restricts the propagation of partial arc and finally

255

causes the flashover voltage to rise.

256

Acknowledgement

257

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of group members for their work on

258

the experiments. The authors also thank the support of the Funds for Innovative Research

259

Groups of China (51321063) and State Grid Corporation of China.

260

References

261

[1] Leclerc M, Bouchard RP, Gervais Y, Mukhedkar D. Wetting processes on a

262

contaminated insulator surface. IEEE Trans. Power Appl Syst 1982; 101: 10051011.

263

[2] Zhang R, Zheng J. Progress in outdoor insulation research in China. IEEE Trans Electr

264

Insul 1990; 25: 11251137.

265

[3] Zhang Z, Jiang X, Cao Y, Sun C, Hu J. Influence of low atmospheric pressure on AC

266

pollution flashover performance of various types insulators. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul

267

2010; 17: 425433.

268

[4] Naito K, Hasegawa Y, Imakoma T. Improvement of the DC voltage insulation

269

efficiency of suspension insulators under contaminated conditions. IEEE Trans Electr Insul

270

1988; 23: 1025-1032.

14

271

[5] Douar MA, Mekhaldi A, Bouzidi MC. Flashover process and frequency analysis of the

272

leakage current on insulator model under non-uniform pollution conditions. IEEE Trans

273

Dielectr Electr Insul 2010; 17: 1284-1297.

274

[6] Chakravorti S, Mukherjee PK. Power frequency and impulse field calculation around a

275

HV insulator with uniform or non-uniform surface pollution. IEEE Trans Electr Insul 1993;

276

28: 43-53.

277

[7] Koshairy MAE, Rizk FAM. Comportement des Isolateurs des Lignes de Transport de

278

Trs Haute Tension Dans les Conditions Dsertiques. CIGRE Rapport 33-05, Paris, France,

279

1970.

280

[8] Jiang X, Wang S, Zhang Z, Hu J, Hu Q. Investigation of flashover voltage and

281

non-uniform pollution correction coefficient of short samples of composite insulator

282

intended for 800kV UHVDC. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 2010; 17: 71-80.

283

[9] Ye H, Zhang J, Ji Y, Sun W, Kondo K, Imakoma T. Contamination accumulation and

284

withstand voltage characteristics of various types of insulators. In: IEEE 2003 Properties and

285

Applications of Dielectric Materials (ICPADM) Conference, Nagoya, Japan: IEEE. pp.

286

1019-1023.

287

[10] Zhang Z, Liu X, Jiang X, Hu J, Gao DW. Study on AC flashover performance for

288

different types of porcelain and glass insulators with non-uniform pollution. IEEE Trans

289

Power Delivery 2013; 28: 1691-1698.

290

[11] EPRI. HVDC transmission line insulation performance: Report EL24618. EPRI, USA,

291

1986.

15

292

[12] Sima W, Yuan T, Yang Q, Xu K, Sun C. Effect of non-uniform pollution on the

293

withstand characteristics of extra high voltage (EHV) suspension ceramic insulator string.

294

IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 2010; 4: 445-455.

295

[13] Zhang Z, Jiang X, Chao Y, Chen L, Sun C, Hu J. Study on DC pollution flashover

296

performance of various types of long string insulators under low atmospheric pressure

297

conditions. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 2010; 25: 2132-2142.

298

[14] Liu X. Study on the pollution accumulation rule and AC pollution flashover

299

performance of insulators with typical sheds. MSc, Chongqing University, Chongqing,

300

China, 2013.

301

[15] Jiang X, Yuan J, Zhang Z, Hu J, Shu L. Study on pollution flashover performance of

302

short samples of composite insulators intended for 800 kV UHVDC. IEEE Trans Dielectr

303

Electr Insul 2007; 14: 1192-1200.

304

[16] Jiang X, Yuan J, Shu L, Zhang Z, Hu J, Mao F. Comparison of DC pollution flashover

305

performances of various types of porcelain, glass, and composite insulators. IEEE Trans

306

Power Delivery 2008; 23: 1183-1900.

307

[17] IEC Standard. Artificial pollution tests on high-voltage insulators to be used on dc

308

Systems. IEC Tech Rep 1245, 1993.

309

[18] CIGRE WGS-33.04. Artificial pollution testing of HVDC insulators: analysis of factors

310

influencing performance. Electra 1992; 11: 98-113.

311

[19] IEC Standard. Artificial pollution tests on high-voltage insulators to be used on AC

312

systems. IEC-60507, 2004.

16

313

[20] Chinese Standard. Artificial pollution tests on High-Voltage insulators to be used on ac

314

systems solid-layer method, GB/T 4585.2-91, 1991.

315

[21] Rizk FAM. Mathematical model for pollution flashover. Electra 1981; 78: 101116.

316

[22] Rahal AH, Huraux C. Flashover mechanism of HV insulators. IEEE Trans Power App

317

Syst 1979; 98: 2223-2229.

318

Tables
Type

Material

H(mm)

D(mm)

L(mm)

Type A: LXY4-160

Glass

146

280

450

Type B: XP-160

Porcelain

155

255

305

Table 1. Technical parameters of the samples.

319

SDD 0.06 mg/cm2

SDD 0.1 mg/cm2

SDD 0.25 mg/cm2

T/B
U50 (kV)

(%)

U50 (kV)

(%)

U50 (kV)

(%)

11

102.5

6.5

90.8

5.3

68.8

5.6

13

116.1

6.7

98.9

5.7

77.5

5.9

15

121.6

7.1

105.3

6.2

81.9

6.1

18

127.2

7.6

110.3

7.5

85.9

6.9

1 15

133.2

6.8

118.1

7.7

89.3

7.4

Table 2. Test results of 7-unit B-type insulator string.

320

SDD = 0.06 mg/cm2

SDD = 0.1 mg/cm2

SDD = 0.25 mg/cm2

T/B

1:1

U50(kV)

(%)

U50(kV)

(%)

U50(kV)

(%)

94.1

4.1

77.0

4.5

55.5

5.5

17

1:3

116.5

4.7

93.2

5.7

69.2

5.8

1:5

127.8

6.7

102.5

6.8

75.0

7.3

1:8

135.4

7.3

111.7

6.4

81.1

6.9

1:15

150.2

7.4

120.3

7.8

88.2

7.7

Table 3. Test results of 7-unit B-type insulator string.

321

K
Type
T/B = 1:1

T/B = 1:3

T/B = 1:5

T/B = 1:8

T/B = 1:15

Type A

0.859

0.680

0.509

0.318

Type B

0.879

0.696

0.520

0.323

Table 4. Value k of the two samples in different T/B.

322

323

T/B

R2

11

46.76

0.282

0.9964

13

52.29

0.281

0.9981

15

55.78

0.277

0.9998

18

58.66

0.275

0.9999

115

60.63

0.283

0.9960

Table 5. Results of a and b of A-type insulator string in different T/B.

R2

1:1

33.21

0.369

0.9994

1:3

41.64

0.360

0.9936

1:5

44.74

0.369

0.9958

18

324

1:8

49.27

0.358

0.9996

1:15

52.50

0.369

0.9955

Table 6. Values of a and b of B-type insulator string in different T/B.

SDD
Type

Type A

Type B

(mg/cm2) T/B = 11T/B = 13T/B = 15T/B = 18 T/B = 115

- 0.67

- 0.09

- 0.59

- 0.36

- 2.27

0.10

1.41

- 2.21

- 1.12

- 1.02

0.04

0.06

- 0.76

- 0.46

- 1.02

- 1.07

- 2.25

0.25

0.06

0.62

0.21

0.60

- 0.04

0.10

- 0.70

- 3.09

- 2.14

- 0.82

- 2.44

0.06

0.74

0.63

1.29

- 0.19

1.15

Table 7. Calculating errors between the test values and the calculated values.

326

Figures

325

327
328
329

(a)

(b)

Figure 1. Structure of the two samples. (a) Type A; (b) Type B.

19

330

Figure 2. AC pollution flashover test circuit.

331

120

Y 0.06 mg/cm 2
Y 0.10 mg/cm

U 50/kV

80
Y 0.25 mg/cm

40

1 1

1 3

1 5
T/B

332
333

1 8

1 15

Figure 3. Relationship between the flashover voltage and T/B for A-type insulator.
6
4

Flashover

IL (A)

Approaching Flashover

0
2
Icr

4
6
334
335

30

60
t (ms)

90

120

Figure 4. Waveform of leakage current along the surface of insulator.

20

1
0.9
0.8

ICR (A)

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
SDD =0.06mg/cm2
0.06
0.1SDD =0.10mg/cm2
SDD =0.25mg/cm2
0.25

0.3
0.2
0.1
0

1:1
1

1:3
2

1:5
3
T/B

336
337

1:8
4

1:15
5

Figure 5. Relationship between ICR and T/B of for B-type insulator string.
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60

U50 (kV)

T/B=1:1
T/B=1:3
T/B=1:5
T/B=1:8
T/B=1:15

0.05

338

0.1
0.15
0.2
2
SDD (mg/cm )

0.25

0.3

(a)

339
160

T/B=1:1
T/B=1:5
T/B=1:15

140
U50 (kV)

120

T/B=1:3
T/B=1:8

100
80
60
40
0

340

0.05

0.1

0.15
0.2
2
SDD (mg/cm )

0.25

0.3

341

(b)

342

Figure 6. Relationship between U50 and SDD. (a) A-type insulator; (b) B-type insulator.