Simplifying The Migration From Copper To Fiber
Simplifying The Migration From Copper To Fiber
Simplifying The Migration From Copper To Fiber
Introduction
For years, broadcast network infrastructures have relied on copper for video transmission.
However, driven by the demands for HD video transport and yet to be determined emerging
technologies, todays broadcast facility faces explosive bandwidth demands and needs an
infrastructure capable of handling higher and higher data rates. The advantages of fiber over
copper, total cost of ownership, and factory pre-terminated cables with plug-and-play solutions
will be exploredproviding engineering managers the basic information for developing a
scalable, reliable, and flexible fiber optic infrastructure capable of handling current needs,
while being futureproofed for years to come.
Cost of Fiber
When comparing the cost of copper versus fiber, a common error is to consider only one part of
the cost, specifically the cost of converting from electrical to optical and then back to electrical.
An accurate cost comparison must consider the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). When all the
costs are compared, it can be seen that implementing fiber becomes very cost effective due
in large part to increased competition and technological advancements that have steadily
decreased costs for optical fiber.
A TOC analysis should include the following costs:
Copper:
Cable
Connectors
Labor to install the cable
Labor to install connectors
Value of the cable trays
Equipment to re-clock the signal (as needed for longer runs)
Fiber:
Pre-terminated fiber assemblies (typically 12, 24, or 48 strands)
Labor to install the fiber
Value of the cable trays
Fiber breakout bulkheads
Fiber jumpers between the main fiber run and the converters
The electrical/optical converters
In actuality, the additional costs of fiber converters and breakout panels are often offset by the
lower cable costs, less labor (e.g. plug-and-play approach), and eliminating the need for reclocking equipment.
Another item often missed in costing are the cable trays, which have a significant value. Although
projects typically are able to use existing cable trays, they are still resources that should be
accounted for and included in the total cost. The TOC approach often reveals that a fiber
infrastructure is not as expensive as previously thought and in many cases can be less expensive
than copper.
OM1 62.5/125m fiber and even OM2 50/125m fiber are today considered legacy with
the advent of OM3 50m and OM4 50m laser optimized multimode fiber (LOMMF). OM4 is
used primarily in very high-speed networks. For broadcasting, OM3/OM4 is commonly used
in the IP environments, such as for storage, playout servers, and graphics. Multimode
considerations include:
Lower cost transmitters
MMF is less vulnerable to dust and used in harsher environments
IEEE 802.3bm recently approved OM4 support of 100GBASE-SR4 at 100m. (70m over OM3)
4x25G optical interface for MMF; Reduces cost (reduce lane count and complexity); utilizes 8
MM fibers; facilitates easy migration to 40 Gb/s.
Grade
1 GbE Distance
10 GbE Distance
Jacket Color
OM1
200 MHz km
300 meters
36 meters
N/A
Orange
OM2
500 MHz km
550 meters
86 meters
N/A
Orange
OM3
2000 MHz km
1 km
300 meters
100 meters
Aqua
OM4
4700 MHz km
1 km
550 meters
125 meters
Aqua
riser and plenum applications. The fibers are double buffered and can be directly terminated,
but because their fibers are not individually reinforced for protection, these cables need to be
broken out with a breakout box or terminated inside a fiber tray, patch panel or junction box.
Breakout Cables: Constructed of several simplex cables bundled together, this cable features
a strong, rugged design, but is larger and more expensive than the distribution cables. It is
suitable for conduit runs, riser and plenum applications. Because each fiber is individually
reinforced, this design allows for quick termination to connectors and does not require patch
panels or boxes. Breakout cables can be more economical when fiber count isnt too large
and distances too long, because it requires much less labor to terminate. Breakout cable is
typically utilized where 19 panels exist and when the panels may be frequently moved or
disturbed. Another option is the use of pre-terminated MPO to LC adapters (hydra cables) or
MPO to LC cassettes.
Factory pre-terminated fiber assemblies: Factory terminated cable (single or multi-strand)
can be used for fiber trunks, as well as for patch cords in most cases. They provide for
easy installation, quick termination, and do not require expensive investment in tools and
technical expertise.
Connector Types
The types of fiber connectors most appropriate for broadcast include:
SC: The SC connector offers excellent loss characteristics and comes in a standard footprint. It
is easy to snap in and remove. The SC is pull-proof and is available in UPC and APC styles.
LC: The LC comes in a small-form-factor. The LC features are similar to SC, but its size allows
double the density. Available in UPC and APC.
MPO: Multi-fiber Push On is a highly reliable multiple fiber connector that typically comes
in 12 fiber and 24 fiber configurations for multi-fiber applications. MPO cable assemblies
play a role in plug-and-play infrastructure design and are discussed in greater length in
upcoming sections.
Disadvantages:
Timely installations
Service availability
Highly skilled workforce
Integrator/Contractor Termination
This approach includes the contracting of outside installer/contractors.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Can be expensive
Dependency on an outside contractor
Disadvantages:
To fully understand the advantages of plug-and-play, the approach will be examined in more
detail in the next section.
The facilitys fiber trunking and interconnect solution consists of the 24-fiber trunk cables between
equipment distribution areas. Within the rack or cabinet, breakout cassettes or hydra cables
transition from the multi-strand MPO connector to individual fiber strands for local distribution.
The Easy, Cost Efficient Migration Path
The 24-fiber data center fiber trunking and interconnect solution offers a simple and costeffective migration path from 10-GbE to 40- and 100-GbE, providing future readiness for three
generations of active equipment. With 24-fiber trunk cables effectively supporting all three
applications, there is no need to re-cable the pathways from the back of the switch panel to the
equipment distribution area; all that cabling remains permanent and never has to be touched.
That means that data center managers can easily migrate to higher speeds, with less time and
complexity. With 24-fiber trunk cables that offer guaranteed performance for 10-, 40- and 100GbE, upgrading the cabling infrastructure is as simple as upgrading the hydra cables or cassettes
and patch cords to the equipment.
or
or
100G*
100G*
100G
100G
Conclusion
For broadcasting, it is not a matter of whether to integrate a high data speed, bandwidth-rich
ready optical fiber infrastructure, but when. The broadcast facility must be ready to meet the
speed of emerging technologies and the quick advances in IP and HD video. Copper just cant
handle the technological future.
There are many ways to build a fiber infrastructure. Concerns over cost and complexity have
been demystified. Simply put, building an optical fiber infrastructure can be cost efficient, hasslefree and easy by deploying a 12 or 24-fiber trunking and interconnect plug-and-play solution
a solution that prepares broadcasters for even 8k and beyond.
www.commscope.com
Visit our website or contact your local CommScope representative for more information.
2016 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved.
All trademarks identified by or are registered trademarks or trademarks, respectively, of CommScope, Inc.
This document is for planning purposes only and is not intended to modify or supplement any specifications or warranties relating to
CommScope products or services.
WP-322924-AE (04/16)