Real Estate - Legislative Brief
Real Estate - Legislative Brief
Real Estate - Legislative Brief
Recent Briefs:
The Civil Aviation
Authority of India Bill,
2013
March 29, 2014
Judicial Appointments
Commission Bill, 2013
March 26, 2014
Joyita Ghose
[email protected]
www.prsindia.org
Key Features
Real Estate Regulatory Authorities, Appellate Tribunals
All states and union territories (UTs) must establish state level regulatory authorities, called Real Estate
Regulatory Authorities (RERAs) within one year of the Act coming into force. Two or more states or UTs
may set up a common RERA. A state or UT may also establish more than one RERA.
Functions of a RERA include: (a) ensuring that residential projects are registered, and their details uploaded
on the RERA website, (b) ensuring that buyers, sellers, and agents comply with obligations under the Act,
and (c) advising the government on matters related to the development of real estate.
Each RERA will consist of a chairperson and at least two full time members with experience in sectors such
as real estate, urban development, law and commerce.
One or more tribunals, called Real Estate Appellate Tribunals, will be established in states and union
territories to hear appeals against decisions of RERAs. One Tribunal may be established for two or more
states. Each Tribunal will consist of a chairperson and two members, one with a judicial background and one
with a technical background.
If a RERA observes that an issue impacts competition, it may refer the case to the Competition Commission.
A Central Advisory Council, consisting of representatives from union ministries, state governments, RERAs
and representatives of the real estate industry, consumers, and labourers will be established. The Council will
advise the central government on major questions of policy, and protection of consumer interests.
-2-
State governments can establish a lower limit for the exemption. Where a project is developed in phases,
each phase must be registered separately. In order to register, the promoter must provide details such as the
layout plan of the project, and the carpet area of property for sale to the RERA.
If the applicant does not hear back from the RERA within 15 days of the application for registration, the
project will be considered registered. Registration may be revoked after giving 30 days notice to the
promoter. In case of revocation, the RERA can recommend the completion of the project through the
competent authority or association of buyers or in any other manner. Here, competent authority refers to the
local authority responsible for land development.
Real estate agents must register with a RERA in order to facilitate the sale or purchase of property in real
estate projects that have been registered. Registered agents must not facilitate the sale of unregistered
projects or mislead buyers regarding services offered.
Penalties
In case the promoter fails to register the property, he may be penalised up to 10% of the estimated cost of the
project. Failure to register despite orders issued by the RERA will lead to imprisonment for up to three
years, and/or an additional fine of 10% of the estimated cost of the project. The promoter will have to pay up
to 5% of the estimate cost of the project if he violates any other provisions of the Act.
Real estate agents will have to pay a fine of Rs 10,000 for violating any provisions of the Act, for each day
the violation continues.
-3-
The Bill provides that states can continue to apply their laws regulating real estate, to the extent that these laws
are not inconsistent with the Act. However, several states have enacted or are in the process of enacting laws
that have provisions that are inconsistent with the Bill. These provisions will be superceded by the Bill. Some
examples are listed below.
While the central Bill mandates establishing a statutory regulatory authority to register projects in a state, West
Bengal has delegated this function to a government department.11 While the central Bill mandates that 70% (or
less, as determined by state governments) of the funds collected from buyers of a project be used only for
construction of that project, certain state governments have allowed for greater flexibility in usage of funds. The
Maharashtra Housing Regulation and Development Act, 2012 mandates that the entire amount collected from
buyers be kept in a separate account and be used for purposes collected.6 The draft Haryana Real Estate
(Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013 mandates that 70% of the amount collected from buyers for a project
be used for that particular real estate project.6
States such as Punjab, West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh have stated that they would prefer to continue existing
laws to regulate real estate. 12 We compare the Bill with certain state laws in the Annexure.
The cost of a real estate project includes the cost of land and the cost of construction (and the profit margin).
The Bill mandates that 70% (or less, determined by states) of the amount collected from buyers for a particular
project be deposited in a separate bank account and be used only for construction of the project. The provision
seeks to address the practice of builders using money from an existing project for other projects, resulting in
delays in completion.7 However, this provision could lead to an increase in the cost of the project.
In some cases, the cost of land may be higher than 30% and the cost of construction less than 70% of the total
cost of the project. Mandating that 70% of the amount collected from buyers for a project should be used only
for construction of that project, could lead to part of the money collected remaining unutilised. At the same
time, the developer may need to borrow funds to finance the cost of purchasing land. The interest cost on these
funds would increase the project cost, which may have to be borne by the buyers.
Similar legislation has addressed the issue differently. The Model Bill (2009) states that the entire amount
collected from buyers be kept in a separate account and be used for purposes collected, allowing for greater
flexibility in its usage.5 The Maharashtra Act (2012) does the same. 6 The draft Haryana Bill (2013) mandates
that 70% be collected and that this amount be used for the real estate project.6
-4-
Several committees and government agencies have outlined major challenges in the real estate sector.4, 15 16
However, it is unclear if a central law can address these issues, given that some of these items fall under the
purview of the state government.
Lengthy approval process for project clearances: In 2012, the Committee on Streamlining Approval
Procedures for Real Estate Projects recommended establishing a single window clearance system for
approvals. It noted that up to 50 approvals are required for projects, across three levels of government,
taking up to four years.4
The Bill allows RERAs to make recommendations to state governments regarding measures to improve the
approval process. However, the Standing Committee has recommended that a new provision be inserted to
allow RERAs to direct state governments to establish a single window system.7
Lack of clear land titles: The Planning Commission has pointed out that unclear land titles and lack of
transparency in real estate transactions are detrimental to the development of the real estate sector.13 In 2010,
the centre published a Model Bill, the draft Land Titling Bill, to reform the land titling system.14 In 2012, the
Standing Committee on Rural Development suggested that modernisation of land records, including land
titles, would be useful for land based developmental and regulatory activities.15
Prevalence of black money: In a 2012 paper on black money, the Finance Ministry pointed out that the real
estate sector, which constitutes about 11% of the GDP of the country, is particularly vulnerable to black
money through underreporting of transaction prices while paying taxes.16
Notes
1. This Brief has been written on the basis of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013, which was introduced
in the Rajya Sabha on August 14, 2013, http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Real%20Estate/Real%20estate%20Bill.pdf.
2. Belaire Owners Association vs. DLF Limited, HUDA, and Ors, CCI, Case No. 19/2010, August 12, 2011; Esha Ekta
Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited and Ors vs. Municipal Corporation of Mumbai and Ors, AIR 2013 SC
1861; Priyanka Estates International Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Assam, AIR 2010 SC 1030.
3. Belaire Owners Association vs DLF Limited, HUDA, and Ors, CCI, Case No. 19/2010, August 12, 2011. The CCI fined
DLF Limited Rs 630 crore for abusing its dominant position in the sector by enforcing unfair buyers agreements.
4. Volume I: Report of the Committee on Streamlining Approval Procedures for Real Estate Projects in India, Ministry of
Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, January 2013, http://mhupa.gov.in/W_new/SAPREP-march.pdf.
5. The Model Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2009, Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation,
mhupa.gov.in/W_new/Model%20Real%20Estate%20Act.doc.
6. Maharashtra Housing Regulation and Development Act, 2012,
https://www.maharashtra.gov.in/Site/Upload/Acts%20Rules/English/Housing_Act29314.pdf, Draft Haryana Real Estate
(Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013, http://tcpharyana.gov.in/Tentative%20Draft%20Bill%2014.02.2013.pdf.
7. 30th Report: The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013, Standing Committee on Urban Development,
February 13, 2014, http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Real%20Estate/SCR-Real%20Estate%20Bill.pdf.
8. Lok Sabha, Unstarred Question No. 657, Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, August, 7, 2013; Lok Sabha,
Unstarred Question No. 1564, Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, August 21, 2012; Lok Sabha, Unstarred
Question No. 4707, Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, May 4, 2012.
9. List III (Concurrent List) has the following items. Entry 6: Transfer of property other than agricultural land, registration of
deeds, documents. Entry 7: Contracts, including partnership, agency, contracts of carriage, and other special forms of
contracts, but not including contracts relating to agricultural land.
10. Real Estate Bill to protect the interest of Consumers and Promote Fair Play in Real Estate Transactions, Press
Information Bureau, Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, June 5, 2013.
11. West Bengal Building (Regulation of Promotion of Construction and Transfer by Promoters) Act, 1993.
12. Cabinet Note on the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013 (obtained through RTI), March 2013.
13. 10th Five Year Plan, 2002 07, Planning Commission,
http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/10th/volume2/v2_ch7_6.pdf.
14. Draft Land Titling Bill, 2010, Ministry of Rural Development,
http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/draft/Revised%20Draft%20Land%20Titling%20Bill%202011%2013-05-2011.pdf.
15. 33rd Report: Computerisation of Land Records, Standing Committee on Rural Development, August 28, 2012,
http://164.100.47.134/lsscommittee/Rural%20Development/15_Rural%20Development_33.pdf.
16. Black Money: White Paper May 2012, Ministry of Finance, May 2012,
http://finmin.nic.in/reports/WhitePaper_BackMoney2012.pdf.
June 10, 2014
-5-
Annexure: Comparison of central Bill with Model Bill and state laws
Table 1: Comparison of central Bill with Model Bill and state laws
Provision
Regulator
Projects covered
Registration
Registration of
real estate agents
Written
agreement
Separate account
to be maintained
by promoter
Penalty on failure
to grant
possession
Up to Rs 10 lakh.
Registration must be
considered within three
months of application.
No provision.
Imprisonment of 3 months
to 4 years, or a fine of Rs
10,000 or the amount of the
damages, or both.
Imprisonment of 3 months-3
years, or a fine of up to Rs
5000, or both.
Authority prescribed by the
state government.
Sources: The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013; Model Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2009; Maharashtra Housing Regulation and Development Act, 2012; Draft Haryana Real Estate
(Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013; West Bengal Building (Regulation of Promotion of Construction and Transfer by Promoters) Act, 1993; PRS.
DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due
acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (PRS). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not
represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.
June 10, 2014
-6-