Motion To Compel Deposition of William Meyler
Motion To Compel Deposition of William Meyler
Motion To Compel Deposition of William Meyler
This is an action which finds its genesis in malpractice and negligence. As part and
parcel to the causes of actions are allegations that the individual, William Meyler, (Meyler)
failed in his standard duty of care in his accounting duties and while performing services for
Plaintiff.
2.
On July 25, 2016, Plaintiff contacted opposing counsel in an attempt to set a date
in September to obtain the deposition of Meyler. On August 11, 2016, after no response for nearly
two weeks, Plaintiff again contacted Defendant in an attempt to set a date for the deposition of
Meyler. See correspondence attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Plaintiff has
provided a litany of dates to the Defendants, and has agreed to take the deposition of Meyler in
New Jersey.
3.
On August 11, 2016, opposing counsel responded, but did not provide dates for the
On August 15, 2016, Defendant responded stating that he was unavailable for each
day Plaintiff suggested for the deposition of Meyler, but failed to suggest any alternative dates for
the deposition. That same day, Plaintiff, once again, requested dates that Defendant would be
available for the deposition. Exhibit B.
5.
On August 17, 2016, Defendant responded to Plaintiffs prior e-mail by stating that
they would not provide potential dates for Meylers deposition because they had not agreed to
commence discovery. Exhibit C.
6.
On August 24, 2016, in another attempt to obtain potential dates for Meylers
deposition, Plaintiff again e-mailed Defendant to obtain dates. Defendant responded, but did not
provide potential deposition dates. Exhibit D.
7.
Plaintiff has made numerous attempts, stretching for a period of over a month, to
take the deposition of Meyler, however, Defendant has been uncooperative and dilatory.
Moreover, the Defendant has sought an order of protection, which has been denied by this Court.
8.
As a result of the above, this Motion has been filed and Plaintiff has incurred costs
and fees to compel Defendants compliance. Plaintiff has made attempts to avoid the need of this
Motion and seek compliance by Defendant. Accordingly, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5),
Plaintiff requests that Defendants be ordered to pay an award of attorneys fees incurred in bringing
this motion.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order awarding
Plaintiffs attorneys fees for having to bring this Motion, against Defendant, William Meyler, and
take further action against Defendant including remedies under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5), compel
Defendant to appear for deposition within sixty (60) days, and any other relief that this Court
deems just and proper.
LOCAL RULE 7.1.a.3 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), undersigned counsel for Plaintiff certifies that undersigned
counsel, Kraig Weiss, Esq., conferred with counsel for Defendants by e-mail on August 24, 2016,
in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised by this motion.
Dated: August 29, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
SILVERBERG & WEISS, P.A.
Attorney for Plaintiff
1290 Weston Road, Suite 218
Weston, Florida 33326
Primary e-mail: [email protected]
Tel: (954) 384-0998
Fax: (954) 384-5390
By:_/s/ Paul K. Silverberg______
Paul K. Silverberg, Esq.
Fla. Bar No. 147877
Kraig S. Weiss, Esq.
Fla. Bar No. 63193
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 29th day of August, 2016, I electronically filed the
foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing
document is being served this day in all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List
via transmission of Notice of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
SERVICE LIST
Andrew L. Cole
LeClairRyan
[email protected]
180 Admiral Cochrane Drive, Suite 520
Annapolis, Maryland 21401
P. (410) 224-3000
F. (410) 224-0098
Attorneys for Defendants Cowan, Gunteski
& Co., P.A., Donald Cowan and William Meyler