Riot Games v. Argote - League of Legends - DMCA Complaint PDF

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:1
1 MARC E. MAYER (SBN 190969)

[email protected]
2 KARIN G. PAGNANELLI (SBN 174763)
[email protected]
3 DANIEL A. KOHLER (SBN 285501)
[email protected]
4 MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
11377 West Olympic Boulevard
5 Los Angeles, California 90064-1683
Telephone: (310) 312-2000
6 Facsimile: (310) 312-3100
7 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Riot Games, Inc.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 RIOT GAMES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
STEFAN DELGADO ARGOTE a/k/a
16 Ohm and Burberry; MATTHIAS
OLTMANN a/k/a Joduskame,
17 Rolle3k, and Sheppard; TYRONE
TOM PAUER a/k/a Beaving;
18 CHACHANI MISTI Y PICHU PICHU
S.R.L., a company organized under the
19 laws of Peru; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-5871

COMPLAINT FOR:
(1) TRAFFICKING IN
CIRCUMVENTION DEVICES
(2) INTENTIONAL
INTERFERENCE WITH
CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS
(3) UNFAIR COMPETITION
[DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL]
Riot Games, Inc. (Riot) alleges as follows:
2
3
4
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1.
Riot develops and publishes the immensely popular video game titled
5 League of Legends (LoL). LoL is one of the most popular games in the world
6 and is a leader in the world of eSports (i.e., video games that are played
7 competitively at a professional level). Millions of players around the globe
8 compete in LoL each day, many of whom belong to professional or semi9 professional teams and compete in sanctioned LoL tournaments, often for large
10 monetary prizes. More than 67 million people (both casual players and serious
11 competitors) play LoL each month, many of whom dedicate hundreds or thousands
12 of hours to developing their skills and competing against other players around the
13 world.
14
2.
Riots greatest asset is its strong community of dedicated LoL players,
15 and Riot strives each day to maintain its reputation as the most player-focused
16 game company in the world. Riot thus invests enormous time, money, and effort
17 into ensuring that all of its players have a positive, fun, competitive, and fair
18 experience each time they play LoL. By this Complaint, Riot seeks to put a stop to
19 a commercial enterprise that is dedicated to destroying the LoL player experience,
20 harming the LoL community, and subverting Riots game (and its community) for
21 its own profit.
22
3.
Defendants (and those working in concert with them) operate a
23 cheating service called LeagueSharp (L#). L# is a service and software

24 product that is specifically designed to enable a subset of LoL players who do not
25 wish to play fair to gain substantial unfair advantages over legitimate players (in
26 other words, to cheat). Among other things, L# enables its users to abuse LoL by
27 allowing them to, for example, see hidden information; automate gameplay to
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
1
1 perform in the game with enhanced or inhuman accuracy; and accumulate levels,
2 experience, and items at a rate that is not possible for a normal human player.
3
4.
L# represents an enormous threat to LoL and is causing serious and
4 irreparable harm to Riot and its valuable player community. It is absolutely

5 imperative to Riot and to the future of LoL that the game provides to its players a
6 fair, competitive, and enjoyable environment that rewards its players skill and
7 experience. By enabling some LoL players to cheat in the game or to automate
8 their performance, L# disrupts (and threatens to destroy) Riots carefully crafted
9 gameplay, and ruins the game experience for players that take the game seriously
10 and who wish to play fair.
11
5.
Defendants conduct is willful, deliberate, and malicious and is
12 designed to harm Riot and its player community. Tellingly, Defendants slogan,
13 which is displayed on the L# website, their Twitter feed, and their Facebook page,
14 advertises L# as GAMEBREAKING. Defendants also have engaged in repeated
15 attacks on Riots game servers, have counseled their customers about how to cheat
16 in LoL without being caught, and have advised customers to fraudulently dispute
17 their in-game LoL transactions. Riot initially attempted to resolve this dispute
18 without litigation, including by informally reaching out to Defendants to ask them
19 to cease their activities. Defendants refused to respond. Then, Defendants or those
20 working in concert with them disseminated personal and non-public information
21 about a Riot employee, threatened that employee, and posted offensive comments
22 on the employees social media. Additionally, knowing that this lawsuit was
23 imminent, Defendants have been quickly and carefully destroying or concealing
24 evidence such as their most incriminating online posts and purporting to hide
25 behind a Peruvian shell corporation created solely for the purpose of evading
26 liability.
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
6.
As set forth herein, Defendants have engaged in numerous unlawful
28 acts under United States law. Defendants have violated Section 1201 of the Digital
2
1 Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(2), by selling,

2 importing, offering, providing, and otherwise trafficking in technologies that
3 circumvent or evade Riots sophisticated anti-cheat software. Defendants also
4 have knowingly and intentionally induced thousands or tens of thousands of Riot
5 players in the United States to breach Riots Terms of Use, which explicitly
6 prohibits the precise type of cheating that L# enables. Defendants not only know
7 that their conduct is unlawful, but they engage in that conduct with the deliberate
8 intent to harm Riot and its community.
9
7.
Riot is entitled to monetary damages, injunctive and other equitable
10 relief, and punitive damages against Defendants.

11
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
12
13
8.
This is a civil action seeking damages, injunctive relief, and other
14 equitable relief, under the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA, 17 U.S.C.

15 1201, and under the laws of the State of California.
16
9.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Riots claims for
17 violation of the DMCA pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). Pursuant to

18 28 U.S.C. 1367, this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Riots state law
19 claims for intentional interference with contract and unfair competition, which are
20 so related to Riots claims under the DMCA as to be part of the same case or
21 controversy. Additionally, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28
22 U.S.C. 1332 because the amount in controversy exceeds the sum or value of
23 $75,000, and the action is between a California citizen and citizens of a foreign
24 jurisdiction.
25
10.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they
26 have purposefully directed their activities at the United States, and at California in
27 particular, have purposefully availed themselves of the benefits of doing business
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
3
1 in California, and have established a continuing presence in California. Riot is

2 informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that, without limitation:
3
(a)
Defendants conduct extensive and ongoing business with users in the
4 United States and the State of California;

5
(b)
Defendants distribute L# in the United States and the State of
6 California, advertise and market L# in the United States and the State of California,
7 and communicate directly with users in the State of California, including for the
8 purposes of soliciting purchases of L# by such users and providing technical
9 support for L#;
10
(c)
Defendants have directed their unlawful activities at Riot, knowing
11 and intending that Riot would be harmed by their conduct in the United States and
12 primarily in the State of California, where Riot has its principal place of business
13 (in fact, Defendants specifically advertise their products as being made for Riots
14 game);
15
(d)
Defendants have entered into, and continue to enter into, hundreds or
16 thousands of contracts with individuals in the United States and in the State of
17 California, including contracts pursuant to which such individuals license from
18 Defendants the right to install and use L#. In return for such licenses, Defendants
19 receive ongoing recurring monthly payments from individuals in the United States
20 and the State of California.
21
11.
Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)
22 because this is a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events giving rise
23 to the claims occurred, and/or in which Riot suffered injury.
24
THE PARTIES
25
26
12.
Riot is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the
27 State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Los Angeles, California.
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
4
1 Riot is the publisher and owner of all right, title, and interest in the immensely
2 popular computer game League of Legends.
3
13.
Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
4 Defendant Matthias Oltmann a/k/a Joduskame is an individual residing in

5 Grossenkneten, Germany and/or Oldenburg, Germany. Riot is informed and
6 believes that Oltmann is a primary developer of L#. Riot is informed and believes
7 that Oltmann has used a variety of aliases, including Rolle3k and Sheppard.
8
14.
9 Defendant Stefan Delgado Argote a/k/a Ohm is an individual residing in

10 Wiesbaden, Germany. Riot is informed and believes that Delgado Argote is a
11 central administrator of L# and the L# Website, and is responsible (along with
12 Oltmann) for organizing and maintaining certain fictitious corporate entities
13 through which he and those working in concert with him conduct L# business.
14
15.
15 Defendant Tyrone Tom Pauer a/k/a Beaving is an individual residing in

16 Lnen, Germany. Riot is informed and believes that Pauer is an administrator of
17 L#, is involved in L# community management and website maintenance and
18 administration, and may be an author of the L# software and codebase. Oltmann,
19 Delgado Argote, and Pauer hereafter sometimes are referred to as the Individual
20 Defendants.
21
16.
Defendant Chachani Misti y Pichu Pichu S.R.L. (Chachani) is a
22 company organized under the laws of Peru with its purported address at Avenida
23 Siglo XX nr 110-C, third floor, office 302, Arequipa, 040101, Peru. Defendants
24 have claimed that Chachani owns the copyright in the L# software. Riot is
25 informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Chachani is, in fact, a
26 company created by the Individual Defendants for the purpose of attempting to
27 shield themselves from liability for their unlawful conduct. Riot is informed and
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28 believes that Defendants own and control all aspects of Chachani, operate the
5
1 company from their homes, and have not sufficiently capitalized the company or
2 observed corporate formalities.
3
17.
Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that, at all
4 times herein mentioned, there existed a unity of interest and ownership between the
5 Individual Defendants, on the one hand, and Chachani, on the other, such that any
6 individuality or separateness between them ceased. The Individual Defendants
7 were and are the alter egos of Chachani and, at all times herein mentioned,
8 Chachani has been the mere shell, instrumentality, and conduit through which the
9 Individual Defendants have carried on business, exercising complete control over
10 Chachani to the extent that any individuality or separateness of Chachani does not
11 exist.
12
18.
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate,
13 associate, or otherwise, of the defendants sued herein as Does 1-10 inclusive, are
14 unknown to Riot, which has therefore sued said defendants by such fictitious
15 names. These defendants may include individuals whose real identities are not yet
16 known to Riot, but who are acting in concert with one another, often in the guise of
17 Internet aliases, in committing the unlawful acts alleged herein. Riot will seek
18 leave to amend this complaint to state their true names and capacities once said
19 defendants identities and capacities are ascertained. Riot is informed and
20 believes, and on that basis alleges, that all defendants sued herein are liable to Riot
21 as a result of their participation in all or some of the acts set forth in this complaint.
22 (All of the aforementioned defendants collectively are referred to herein as
23 Defendants.).
24
19.
Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that at all
25 times mentioned in this complaint, each of the Defendants was the agent of each of
26 the other Defendants and, in doing the things alleged in this complaint, was acting
27 within the course and scope of such agency.
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
6
FACTS APPLICABLE TO ALL CLAIMS
Riot and League of Legends
20.
Riot is a game developer and publisher located in Los Angeles,
4 California, best known for the enormously popular game League of Legends.
5 Riot, with its partners and affiliates, develops, publishes, markets, advertises,
6 distributes, maintains, and services LoL in numerous countries throughout the
7 world. Riot owns valid registered copyrights in LoL.
8
21.
LoL is a fast-paced, highly competitive online game. In LoL, two
9 teams of powerful champions, each with a unique design and playstyle, battle
10 head-to-head across multiple computer-generated battlefields and in a variety of
11 game modes and types. LoL blends the speed and intensity of a real-time
12 strategy game with elements of fantasy role-playing and character development.
13
22.
As they compete in online LoL matches, players advance in the
14 games online leaderboards (which ranks players by skill level) and are rewarded
15 with points that enable them to acquire access to additional content. Many LoL
16 players view the game as a serious hobby and sport and invest hundreds or
17 thousands of hours to playing LoL in order to improve their skills, enhance their
18 characters, and rise in the in-game rankings. Riot has organized and held large19 scale LoL tournaments, some of which are televised or broadcast online, played by
20 professional eSports athletes, and attract large crowds. But even casual players
21 enjoy playing LoL and feel a sense of satisfaction when they win a friendly match
22 and rise in the rankings. Riot takes pride in offering a fun and engaging experience
23 for players of all skill levels.
24
23.
LoL is a game that is free to play. To play LoL, a player need only
25 register an account with Riot, free of charge. Via its in-game store, Riot gives
26 players the opportunity to voluntarily pay to unlock and use additional content in
27 the game, such as new champions or more personalized aesthetic features (e.g.,
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28 skins) for existing champions. This content enhances player engagement with,
7
1 and interest in, the LoL community.

2
24.
The success of LoL depends on Riots ability to ensure a consistently
3 engaging and compelling gaming experience for players. As such, Riot goes to
4 great lengths to monitor, balance, and refine the game. Riot develops and releases
5 content patches, fixes, and tweaks on a regular and ongoing basis. These content
6 patches and fixes may include changes to game rules or regulations, buffs (i.e.,
7 making a champion stronger), nerfs (i.e., making a champion less powerful),
8 modifications to champion abilities and/or in-game items to help maintain
9 competitive balance, or bug fixes. Riot also regularly upgrades its server
10 infrastructure to ensure a smooth and consistent online experience for all players.
11 Riot invests thousands of hours and millions of dollars in these ongoing efforts to
12 ensure that LoL remains fair and fun.
13
25.
The importance of maintaining game balance and fairness for players
14 cannot be overestimated. Because LoL is a competitive game, any perception that

15 a player may be cheating or have an unfair advantage results in players becoming
16 frustrated or alienated and potentially leaving the LoL community. Should such
17 perception become widespread, it could destroy or severely impair the game as a
18 whole, since LoL relies on the existence of an active and engaged player
19 community. If players lose interest in LoL, Riot also will be unable to recoup the
20 enormous expense it incurs in maintaining and servicing the game.
21
22
Riots Ongoing Efforts To Protect League of Legends And Its Player
23
Community From Hackers And Cheaters
24
26.
The gaming experience of legitimate LoL players is under near
25 constant attack by cheaters, hackers, scammers, and other wrongdoers seeking to

26 exploit LoL for their own illegitimate ends or to ruin the game for others. In order
27 to protect the game experience, keep the game fair and balanced, and thwart
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
8
1 would-be hackers, Riot has adopted a combination of technical and contractual

2 measures.
3
Riots Technical Security Measures
4
5
27.
Hackers use a variety of techniques to alter and manipulate online
6 games. For example, a hacker may locate important locations in a computers

7 memory, alter the computer code (i.e. the instructions) being processed at these
8 memory locations, and/or inject new or additional code or scripts into the
9 computers memory. By doing so, hackers cause the game to operate in a manner
10 that ordinarily is restricted by the game software. Hackers also may intercept and
11 manipulate data packets transmitted between Riots servers and players in an
12 online game. These packets communicate important gameplay information. Code
13 injection and packet manipulation are just two of the methods used by hackers. In
14 order to protect its games from unauthorized hacking and cheating using these
15 methods and others, Riot developed and employs a number of technical security
16 protections.
17
28.
First, Riot developed and includes within LoL an anti-hacking and
18 anti-cheating software module (the LoL Anti-Cheat Software). The LoL Anti19 Cheat Software is a sophisticated and highly effective technical solution that
20 prevents players from engaging in a variety of prohibited hacking activities,
21 running software programs or cheats, and using unlicensed copies of LoL. The
22 LoL Anti-Cheat Software accomplishes this by, among other methods, checking
23 for the presence of third-party programs that facilitate cheating or any other
24 prohibited modification to the LoL software. If the LoL Anti-Cheat Software
25 detects that a player is using a prohibited program or modifying the LoL software,
26 his or her access to Riots games and services is revoked and Riot may
27 permanently suspend the players Riot account.
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
9
29.
The LoL Anti-Cheat Software is effective at detecting and revoking
2 the access of any player found to be tampering with LoL. Thus, in order for a
3 player to employ hacking or cheating software, such as the L# software, that
4 software necessarily must be designed to circumvent, avoid, disable, or evade these
5 systems. Riot has expended significant resources (both monetary and human)
6 developing and maintaining the LoL Anti-Cheat Software and ensuring it is
7 effective. Since hackers and cheaters regularly attempt to circumvent, disable, or
8 avoid the LoL Anti-Cheat Software, Riot must regularly update and improve that
9 software.
10
30.
Second, Riot employs the use of encryption technology to protect the
11 LoL software client and the communication protocol through which online game
12 data is transmitted from hackers. Without engaging in decryption activity, a
13 hacker cannot locate the software elements, data, or memory locations necessary to
14 manipulate gameplay.
15
Riots Contractual Protection Of League of Legends
16
17
31.
In order to access, download, or play LoL, players must create and
18 register a free Riot account. As part of the account creation process, the player
19 must expressly manifest his or her assent to the LoL Terms of Use (the TOU).
20 The entire text of the TOU is displayed to a player at the time he or she is asked to
21 assent to its terms. Riot also makes the TOU permanently available on Riots
22 website. If the player declines to assent to the TOU, he or she will be unable to
23 create an account and will not be able to play LoL.
24
32.
The TOU provides to the player a limited license to use and enjoy the
25 LoL software, game, and website, subject to certain restrictions. Section 5.1 of the
26 TOU expressly prohibits the player from:
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
Using any unauthorized third party programs, including

mods, hacks, cheats, scripts, bots, trainers and
10
automation programs that interact with the [LoL]

Software in any way, for any purpose, including any
unauthorized third party programs that intercept, emulate,
or redirect any communication between the Software and
Riot Games and any unauthorized third party programs
that collect information about [LoL] by reading areas of
memory used by the Software to store information.
2
3
4
5
6 The TOU also prevents players from [p]laying on another persons account to
7 boost that accounts status or rank.
8
33.
LoL may only be played using Riots proprietary online platform. As
9 a result, it is not possible for a player to lawfully obtain access to or play LoL
10 without creating an account and expressly consenting to the TOU.
11
12
13
Defendants And L#
34.
14 Defendants are responsible for and oversee all aspects of the L# service, including
15 its development, distribution, marketing, and maintenance. Defendants, including
16 the Individual Defendants, programmed the L# software, designed and operate the
17 website on which the L# service is offered for license and distribution, oversee and
18 administer all finances in connection with the L# service, update the L# software
19 when necessary (including as necessary to defeat Riots LoL Anti-Cheat Software),
20 and provide technical support for the L# service. Defendants also regularly post on
21 the L# forums, provide customers with updates on the services, employ individuals
22 who assist with the development of the software, and pay individual freelancers
23 who engage in scripting or coding in connection with the L# service.
24
35.
Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that each of
25 the Individual Defendants has a long history in the hacking and cheating
26 community and has regularly been involved in malicious or fraudulent computer
27 hacking activities. Oltmann, for example, has been involved in a number of
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28 malicious attacks and/or exploits against Riots game servers. The Individual
11
1 Defendants also have been involved in extensive hacking of computer games other
2 than LoL, such as Blizzard Entertainments Diablo 2.
3
36.
Defendants distribute and license L# via the LeagueSharp website,
4 located at www.joduska.me (the L# Website). Defendants require customers to

5 pay a $15.00 monthly subscription fee to obtain and use the L# service and
6 software. Defendants also offer a botting service for $50.00 per month, which
7 permits users to automate multiple accounts simultaneously. The botting service is
8 designed for those users that wish to make money by creating and selling accounts
9 that have been artificially leveled. Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis
10 alleges, that tens of thousands of people currently subscribe to L#, and that
11 Defendants generate hundreds of thousands of dollars each month in connection
12 with L#.
13
37.
Defendants advertise and market L# as a tool for League of Legends
14 which allows the user to inject assemblies or so called LoL scripts into the game.
15 In basic terms, L# enables users to inject (and thus use) a variety of cheats and
16 hacks in LoL. Among these are hacks that (1) enable a user to see aspects of the
17 game that would normally be hidden (e.g. hidden enemy movements), (2) intercept
18 game actions and respond with inhuman accuracy, (3) cause a user to automatically
19 dodge all incoming spells, damage, and skillshots, and (4) enhance a players field
20 of vision. Additionally, L# enables users to fully or partially automate gameplay,
21 thereby enabling users to rapidly level their account, gain quick access to in22 game champions and other content, and artificially elevate their position on LoLs
23 leaderboards.
24
38.
Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that in order
25 to create L# Defendants downloaded copies of the LoL game client, viewed and
26 manifested their assent to the ToU, and then disassembled, decompiled, or
27 otherwise reverse engineered portions of the LoL client and server software.
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28 Additionally, in the ordinary course of LoLs operation, relevant memory locations

12
1 are hidden and inaccessible and data packets are encrypted. Riot is informed and
2 believes, and on that basis alleges, that to create L#, Defendants used specialized
3 software to decrypt data packets and obtain access to restricted memory locations.
4
39.
In its normal course of operation, the LoL Anti-Cheat Software is
5 designed to, and would, detect the use of the various hacks and cheats enabled by
6 L#. However, Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that the L#
7 software circumvents or bypasses the LoL Anti-Cheat Software in a variety of
8 different ways, including by intercepting and falsely responding to checks
9 performed by the LoL Anti-Cheat Software. Defendants regularly update L# to
10 keep pace with improvements in the LoL Anti-Cheat Software. They also notify
11 their customers when the LoL Anti-Cheat software has been updated and when an
12 update to the L# software is necessary.
13
40.
L# is an unauthorized third party program (and, specifically, is a
14 hack, cheat, bot, and automation program) whose use is strictly prohibited by the
15 TOU. Each and every time that one of Defendants customers uses L#, that
16 customer is engaging in a direct violation of the TOU. Defendants customers also
17 violate the TOU when they use the L# service to artificially boost an accounts
18 ranking or status (whether for purposes of selling the account or otherwise).
19 Because L# is a single-purpose software program and works only with LoL, it
20 cannot be used without violating the TOU.
21
41.
Defendants are aware that to use their product their users necessarily
22 must violate the TOU (in fact, Defendants themselves consented to the TOU and
23 are thus knowledgeable as to its terms). Nevertheless, they encourage and induce
24 their customers to engage in continuing and blatant contractual violations. In fact,
25 Defendants advise their customers how to avoid being caught by Riot and, thus,
26 how to secretly engage in ongoing and repeated breaches of the TOU while
27 continuing to use Riots product.
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
13
42.
Defendants conduct is brazen and willful. Defendants are well aware
2 that Riot is the owner of LoL, that L# is designed to circumvent and bypass the
3 LoL Anti-Cheat Software, and that the use of L# is in clear violation of the TOU.
4 Defendants also are well aware that their conduct causes harm to Riot, LoL, and
5 the LoL player community. Notably, they advertise their product as
6 GAMEBREAKING and they regularly tout L#s ability to circumvent the LoL
7 Anti-Cheat Software. Defendants even have counseled their customers in the past
8 on how to avoid being charged for items that they purchased on an account that is
9 suspended, including by recommending that they falsely represent to their credit
10 card companies that they did not make the purchases. When Defendants became
11 aware that this lawsuit was imminent, they deleted these communications, as well
12 as many other communications relating to their unlawful hacking and
13 circumvention activities.
14
The Harm To Riot From Defendants Conduct
15
16
43.
By their conduct, Defendants knowingly caused and continue to cause
17 serious harm to Riot and its community. Such harm is immediate, massive and
18 irreparable.
19
44.
First, Defendants irreparably harm the ability of Riots legitimate
20 players to enjoy and participate in LoL. That, in turn, causes those players to grow
21 dissatisfied with LoL, lose interest, and stop playing. Riot is informed and
22 believes, and on that basis alleges, that players have ceased playing LoL, and/or
23 ceased purchasing goods and services (including virtual goods) for LoL as a result
24 of L# and similar cheating software programs.
25
45.
Second, Defendants conduct has required Riot to spend enormous
26 sums of money (and vast amounts of time) attempting to remediate the damage
27 caused by L#. This includes creating and releasing new versions of the LoL AntiMitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28 Cheat Software, responding to player complaints, employing personnel to police

14
1 the games to detect the use of hacks and cheats, and terminating the accounts of
2 players who are using hacks and cheats.
3
46.
Third, Defendants conduct harms Riots reputation and results in the
4 loss of player goodwill, in the United States and worldwide.

5
47.
Defendants conduct has resulted in damage to Riot in an amount to
6 be proven at trial. Unless Defendants are preliminarily or permanently enjoined,

7 Riot will continue to suffer severe harm.
8
9
COUNT I
10
Trafficking In Circumvention Devices
11
48.
Riot realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations in
12 paragraphs 1 through 47 as if set forth fully herein.

13
49.
LoL, including but not limited to the source code and audiovisual
14 game play environments, is a copyrighted work.

15
50.
Riot has incorporated into LoL technological measures that effectively
16 control access to LoL, including access to the dynamic audiovisual elements that
17 comprise LoL.
18
51.
L# is comprised of or contains technologies, products, services,
19 devices, components, or parts thereof that primarily are designed or produced for
20 the purpose of circumventing technological measures that effectively control the
21 access to copyrighted works (LoL), and that protect the exclusive rights of the
22 copyright owner (Riot).
23
52.
L# (and the portions thereof that circumvent the LoL Anti-Cheat
24 Software) has no commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent

25 a technological measure that effectively controls access to a copyrighted work and
26 that protects the exclusive rights of a copyright owner.
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
53.
Defendants market L# in the United States with knowledge of its use
28 to circumvent Riots technological access controls.

15
54.
As a result of the foregoing, Defendants are offering to the public,
2 providing, or otherwise trafficking in the United States in technology that violates

3 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(2).
4
55.
Defendants acts constituting DMCA violations have been and
5 continue to be performed without the permission, authorization, or consent of Riot.

6
56.
Defendants have violated Section 1201 of the DMCA willfully and for
7 private commercial gain.

8
57.
Defendants conduct has caused damage to Riot and has unjustly
9 enriched Defendants, in an amount to be proven at trial.

10
58.
As a result of Defendants acts and conduct, Riot has sustained and
11 will continue to sustain substantial, immediate, and irreparable injury, for which
12 there is no adequate remedy at law. Riot is informed and believes, and on that
13 basis alleges, that, unless enjoined and restrained by this Court, Defendants will
14 continue to violate Section 1201 of the DMCA. Riot is entitled to injunctive relief
15 to restrain and enjoin Defendants continuing unlawful conduct.
16
59.
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, pursuant to
17 17 U.S.C. 1203(c), Riot is entitled to Defendants profits attributable to their

18 violations of 17 U.S.C 1201.
19
60.
Alternatively, Riot is entitled to the maximum statutory damages,
20 pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1203(c), in the amount of $25,000 with respect to each

21 violation by Defendants.
22
61.
Riot further is entitled to its attorneys fees and full costs pursuant to
23 17 U.S.C. 1203(b).
24
25
COUNT II
26
Intentional Interference With Contractual Relations
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
62.
28 paragraphs 1 through 61, as if set forth fully herein.

16
63.
Riots contracts with its players, including the TOU, are valid and
2 enforceable.
3
64.
4 Defendants are aware of the contracts between Riot and its players in the United
5 States, and additionally are aware of the TOU by virtue of their own Riot accounts.
6 Defendants specifically are aware that the TOU prohibits players from using
7 cheats, hacks, bots, or other unauthorized software, and from boosting accounts
8 for sale to others. Nevertheless, Defendants intentionally encourage and induce
9 LoL players to purchase and use L#, knowing that the use of L# by Defendants
10 customers will breach the TOU.
11
65.
By inducing players to breach the TOU, Defendants have intentionally
12 interfered, and continue to interfere, with contracts between Riot and its players.
13
66.
As a result of Defendants actions, Riot has suffered damage in an
14 amount to be proven at trial, including but not limited to loss of goodwill among
15 players of LoL, diversion of Riot resources to attempt to detect and prevent the use
16 of L#, and loss of profits from players whose accounts Riot has terminated for
17 violation of the TOU.
18
67.
As a further result of Defendants actions, Defendants have unjustly
19 obtained specifically identifiable property, consisting of all of the proceeds

20 attributable to the sale of L# in the United States, and any other products or
21 services that violate any of Riots rights, and any additional property traceable to
22 those proceeds. Those proceeds, which are directly attributable to Defendants
23 manipulation and misuse of LoL and intentional interference with Riots contracts,
24 rightfully and equitably belong to Riot.
25
68.
Defendants intentional interference with the contracts between Riot
26 and LoL players entitles Riot to injunctive relief and compensatory damages, the
27 imposition of a constructive trust over Defendants wrongfully obtained proceeds,
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28 and other available relief.

17
69.
Defendants are guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, and Riot, in
2 addition to its actual damages, by reason thereof, is entitled to recover exemplary

3 and punitive damages against Defendants.
4
5
COUNT III
Unfair Competition
70.
8 paragraphs 1 through 69, as if set forth fully herein.

9
71.
The acts and conduct of Defendants constitute unfair competition in
10 the United States under California Business & Professions Code 17200 et seq.
11 and under California common law.
12
72.
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants unfair competition in
13 the United States, Riot has been damaged, and Defendants have been unjustly
14 enriched, in an amount to be proven at trial for which damages and/or restitution
15 and disgorgement is appropriate. Such damages and/or restitution and
16 disgorgement should include a declaration by this Court that Defendants are
17 constructive trustees for the benefit of Riot, and an order that Defendants convey to
18 Riot the gross receipts received or to be received that are attributable to the sale of
19 L# in the United States.
20
73.
Defendants are guilty of oppression, fraud or malice, and Riot, in
21 addition to its actual damages, by reason thereof, is entitled to recover exemplary

22 and punitive damages against Defendants.
23
74.
As a result of Defendants acts and conduct in the United States, Riot
24 has sustained and will continue to sustain substantial, immediate, and irreparable
25 injury, for which there is no adequate remedy at law. Riot is informed and
26 believes, and on that basis alleges, that unless enjoined and restrained by this
27 Court, Defendants will continue to engage in unfair competition. Pursuant to
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28 California Business & Professions Code 17203, Riot is entitled to temporary,

18
1 preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting further acts of unfair

2 competition.
3
4
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Riot prays that this Court enter judgment in its favor on
6 each and every claim for relief set forth above and award it relief, including but not
7 limited to an order:
8
1.
Preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendants, their officers,
9 employees, agents, subsidiaries, representatives, distributors, dealers, members,

10 affiliates, and all persons acting in concert or participation with Defendants from:
11 (i) trafficking in circumvention devices in the United States; (ii) intentionally
12 interfering with Riots contracts with players in the United States; and (iii)
13 engaging in unfair competition in the United States.
14
2.
Requiring Defendants to shut down L# and any colorable copies
15 thereof, hosted at any domain, address, location, or ISP.

16
3.
Requiring Defendants to deliver to Riot all copies of materials that
17 infringe or violate any of Riots rights, as described herein.

18
4.
Requiring Defendants to provide Riot with an accounting of any and
19 all sales of products or services in the United States that infringe or violate any of
20 Riots rights, as described herein.
21
5.
Awarding Riot actual or statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C.
22 1203(c).
23
6.
Awarding Riot its full costs and attorneys fees in this action pursuant
24 to 17 U.S.C. 1203(b) and other applicable laws.

25
7.
Awarding Riot exemplary and punitive damages against Defendants
26 on Riots second cause of action for intentional interference with contractual

27 relations.
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
19
8.
Awarding Riot restitution of Defendants unlawful proceeds,
2 including an accounting of any and all sales of L# in the United States, and/or any
3 other products or services that violate any of Riots rights described herein.
4
9.
Imposing a constructive trust over the proceeds unjustly obtained by
5 Defendants through the sale of L# in the United States, and/or any other products
6 or services that violate any of Riots rights described herein.
7
10.
Awarding such other and further relief as this Court may deem just
8 and appropriate.
9
10 Dated: August 5, 2016
11
12
13
14
15
MARC E. MAYER
KARIN G. PAGNANELLI
DANIEL A. KOHLER
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
By: /s/Marc E. Mayer
Marc E. Mayer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Riot Games, Inc.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
20
JURY DEMAND
1
2
Plaintiff Riot Games, Inc. hereby demands a trial by jury on all matters and
3 issues so triable.
4
5 Dated: August 5, 2016
6
7
8
9
10
MARC E. MAYER
KARIN G. PAGNANELLI
DANIEL A. KOHLER
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
By: /s/Marc E. Mayer
Marc E. Mayer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Riot Games, Inc.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mitchell
Silberberg &
Knupp LLP
28
21
Case 2:16-cv-05871
Document
2 Filed
08/05/16
PageOF1CALIFORNIA
of 3 Page ID #:23
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT,
CENTRAL
DISTRICT
CIVIL COVER SHEET
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS ( Check box if you are representing yourself
Riot Games, Inc., a Delaware corporation
DEFENDANTS
( Check box if you are representing yourself
)
STEFAN DELGADO ARGOTE a/k/a Ohm and Burberry; MATTHIAS
OLTMANN a/k/a Joduskame, Rolle3k, and Sheppard; TYRONE
TOM PAUER a/k/a Beaving; CHACHANI MISTI Y PICHU PICHU
S.R.L., a company organized under the laws of Peru; and DOES 1-10,
inclusive
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Los Angeles
County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address and Telephone Number) If you are
Attorneys (Firm Name, Address and Telephone Number) If you are

representing yourself, provide the same information.
representing yourself, provide the same information.
Marc E. Mayer (SBN 190969)/Karin G. Pagnanelli (SBN 174763)/

Daniel A. Kohler (SBN 285501)
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP
11377 W. Olympic Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683 Telephone: 310-312-2000
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in one box only.)
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES-For Diversity Cases Only

(Place an X in one box for plaintiff and one for defendant)
PTF
3. Federal Question (U.S.

Government Not a Party)
1. U.S. Government
Plaintiff
2. U.S. Government.
Defendant
4. Diversity (Indicate Citizenship

of Parties in Item III)
Citizen of This State
DEF
1
Citizen of Another State
Citizen or Subject of a
Foreign Country
Incorporated or Principal Place

of Business in this State
Incorporated and Principal Place
of Business in Another State
PTF
4
DEF
4
Foreign Nation
IV. ORIGIN (Place an X in one box only.)

1. Original
Proceeding
2. Removed from
State Court
3. Remanded from
Appellate Court
V. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: JURY DEMAND:

CLASS ACTION under F.R.Cv.P. 23:
Yes
4. Reinstated or
Reopened
Yes
No
No
5. Transferred from Another

District (Specify)
6. Multi District
Litigation
(Check "Yes" only if demanded in complaint.)

MONEY DEMANDED IN COMPLAINT: $ per statute
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION (Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and write a brief statement of cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity.)
(1) TRAFFICKING IN CIRCUMVENTION DEVICES; (2) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS;
(3) UNFAIR COMPETITION
VII. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in one box only). Violation of DMCA; intentional interference with contract, unfair competition.
REAL PROPERTY CONT.
OTHER STATUTES
CONTRACT
375 False Claims Act
110 Insurance
240 Torts to Land
376 Qui Tam

(31 USC 3729(a))
120 Marine
245 Tort Product

Liability
400 State
Reapportionment
130 Miller Act
450 Commerce/ICC
Rates/Etc.
140 Negotiable
Instrument
150 Recovery of
Overpayment &
Enforcement of
Judgment
460 Deportation
151 Medicare Act
410 Antitrust
430 Banks and Banking
470 Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Org.

480 Consumer Credit
490 Cable/Sat TV
152 Recovery of
Defaulted Student
Loan (Excl. Vet.)
850 Securities/Com modities/Exchange
153 Recovery of
Overpayment of
Vet. Benefits
890 Other Statutory

Actions
160 Stockholders
Suits
891 Agricultural Acts
190 Other
Contract
893 Environmental
Matters
895 Freedom of Info.
Act
195 Contract
Product Liability
196 Franchise
896 Arbitration
REAL PROPERTY
899 Admin. Procedures
Act/Review of Appeal of
Agency Decision
950 Constitutionality of
State Statutes
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:

CV-71 (02/16)
210 Land
Condemnation
220 Foreclosure
230 Rent Lease &
Ejectment
IMMIGRATION
462 Naturalization
Application
465 Other
Immigration Actions
TORTS
PERSONAL PROPERTY
290 All Other Real

Property
TORTS
PERSONAL INJURY
310 Airplane
315 Airplane
Product Liability
320 Assault, Libel &
Slander
330 Fed. Employers'
Liability
340 Marine
345 Marine Product
Liability
350 Motor Vehicle
355 Motor Vehicle
Product Liability
360 Other Personal
Injury
362 Personal Injury
Med Malpractice
365 Personal InjuryProduct Liability
367Health Care/
Pharmaceutical
Personal Injury
Product Liability
368 Asbestos
Personal Injury
Product Liability
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
PROPERTY RIGHTS
820 Copyrights
463 Alien Detainee
830 Patent
510 Motions to Vacate

Sentence
840 Trademark
SOCIAL SECURITY
530 General
535 Death Penalty
861 HIA (1395ff)
370 Other Fraud
862 Black Lung (923)
371 Truth in Lending
Other:
380 Other Personal

Property Damage
540 Mandamus/Other
863 DIWC/DIWW (405 (g))
550 Civil Rights
864 SSID Title XVI
385 Property Damage

Product Liability
BANKRUPTCY
422 Appeal 28
USC 158
423 Withdrawal 28
USC 157
CIVIL RIGHTS
440 Other Civil Rights
441 Voting
442 Employment
443 Housing/
Accommodations
445 American with
DisabilitiesEmployment
446 American with
Disabilities-Other
448 Education
555 Prison Condition

560 Civil Detainee
Conditions of
Confinement
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
625 Drug Related
Seizure of Property 21
USC 881
690 Other
LABOR
710 Fair Labor Standards
Act
720 Labor/Mgmt.
Relations
740 Railway Labor Act
751 Family and Medical
Leave Act
790 Other Labor
Litigation
791 Employee Ret. Inc.
Security Act
Case Number:
CIVIL COVER SHEET
Page 1 of 3
865 RSI (405 (g))

FEDERAL TAX SUITS
870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or
Defendant)
871 IRS-Third Party 26 USC
7609
Case 2:16-cv-05871
Document
2 Filed
08/05/16
PageOF2CALIFORNIA
of 3 Page ID #:24
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT,
CENTRAL
DISTRICT
CIVIL COVER SHEET
VIII. VENUE: Your answers to the questions below will determine the division of the Court to which this case will be initially assigned. This initial assignment is subject
to change, in accordance with the Court's General Orders, upon review by the Court of your Complaint or Notice of Removal.
QUESTION A: Was this case removed
from state court?
Yes
If "no," skip to Question B. If "yes," check the

box to the right that applies, enter the
corresponding division in response to
Question E, below, and continue from there.
QUESTION B: Is the United States, or

one of its agencies or employees, a
PLAINTIFF in this action?
Yes
STATE CASE WAS PENDING IN THE COUNTY OF:
INITIAL DIVISION IN CACD IS:
No
Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, or San Luis Obispo
Western
Orange
Southern
Riverside or San Bernardino
Eastern
B.1. Do 50% or more of the defendants who reside in
YES. Your case will initially be assigned to the Southern Division.

Enter "Southern" in response to Question E, below, and continue
from there.
the district reside in Orange Co.?

check one of the boxes to the right
No
NO. Continue to Question B.2.
B.2. Do 50% or more of the defendants who reside in

If "no," skip to Question C. If "yes," answer
Question B.1, at right.
QUESTION C: Is the United States, or

one of its agencies or employees, a
DEFENDANT in this action?
YES. Your case will initially be assigned to the Eastern Division.

Enter " Eastern " in response to Question E, below, and continue
from there.
the district reside in Riverside and/or San Bernardino

Counties? (Consider the two counties together.)
check one of the boxes to the right .
NO. Your case will initially be assigned to the Western Division.

Enter "Western" in response to Question E, below, and continue
from there.
C.1. Do 50% or more of the Plaintiffs who reside in the
YES. Your case will initially be assigned to the Southern Division.

Enter "Southern" in response to Question E, below, and continue
from there.
district reside in Orange Co.?

check one of the boxes to the right
Yes
No
NO. Continue to Question C.2.
C.2. Do 50% or more of the Plaintiffs who reside in the

If "no," skip to Question D. If "yes," answer
Question C.1, at right.
YES. Your case will initially be assigned to the Eastern Division.

Enter " Eastern " in response to Question E, below, and continue
from there.
district reside in Riverside and/or San Bernardino

Counties? (Consider the two counties together.)
check one of the boxes to the right .
NO. Your case will initially be assigned to the Western Division.

Enter "Western" in response to Question E, below, and continue
from there.
A.
QUESTION D: Location of plaintiffs and defendants?
Orange County
B.
Riverside or San
Bernardino County
C.
Los Angeles, Ventura,
Santa Barbara, or San
Luis Obispo County
Indicate the location(s) in which 50% or more of plaintiffs who reside in this district
reside. (Check up to two boxes, or leave blank if none of these choices apply.)
Indicate the location(s) in which 50% or more of defendants who reside in this
district reside. (Check up to two boxes, or leave blank if none of these choices
apply.)
D.1. Is there at least one answer in Column A?
Yes
D.2. Is there at least one answer in Column B?
No
Yes
If "yes," your case will initially be assigned to the
No
If "yes," your case will initially be assigned to the
SOUTHERN DIVISION.
EASTERN DIVISION.
Enter "Southern" in response to Question E, below, and continue from there.
Enter "Eastern" in response to Question E, below,
If "no," go to question D2 to the right.
If "no," your case will be assigned to the WESTERN DIVISION.

Enter "Western" in response to Question E, below.
QUESTION E: Initial Division?

Enter the initial division determined by Question A, B, C, or D above:
INITIAL DIVISION IN CACD
WESTERN
QUESTION F: Northern Counties?

Do 50% or more of plaintiffs or defendants in this district reside in Ventura, Santa Barbara, or San Luis Obispo counties?
CV-71 (02/16)
CIVIL COVER SHEET
Yes
Page 2 of 3
No
Case 2:16-cv-05871
Document
2 Filed
08/05/16
Page
of 3 Page ID #:25
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT,
CENTRAL
DISTRICT
OF3CALIFORNIA
CIVIL COVER SHEET
IX(a). IDENTICAL CASES: Has this action been previously filed in this court?
NO
YES
If yes, list case number(s):
IX(b). RELATED CASES: Is this case related (as defined below) to any civil or criminal case(s) previously filed in this court?
NO
YES
If yes, list case number(s):

Civil cases are related when they (check all that apply):
A. Arise from the same or a closely related transaction, happening, or event;

B. Call for determination of the same or substantially related or similar questions of law and fact; or
C. For other reasons would entail substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges.
Note: That cases may involve the same patent, trademark, or copyright is not, in itself, sufficient to deem cases related.
A civil forfeiture case and a criminal case are related when they (check all that apply)
A. Arise from the same or a closely related transaction, happening, or event;
B. Call for determination of the same or substantially related or similar questions of law and fact; or
C. Involve one or more defendants from the criminal case in common and would entail substantial duplication of
labor if heard by different judges.
X. SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY
(OR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT):
DATE:
August 5, 2016
Marc E. Mayer
Notice to Counsel/Parties: The submission of this Civil Cover Sheet is required by Local Rule 3-1. This Form CV-71 and the information contained herein
neither replaces nor supplements the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. For
more detailed instructions, see separate instruction sheet (CV-071A).
Key to Statistical codes relating to Social Security Cases:

Nature of Suit Code Abbreviation
Substantive Statement of Cause of Action

All claims for health insurance benefits (Medicare) under Title 18, Part A, of the Social Security Act, as amended. Also,
include claims by hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, etc., for certification as providers of services under the program.
(42 U.S.C. 1935FF(b))
861
HIA
862
BL
863
DIWC
All claims filed by insured workers for disability insurance benefits under Title 2 of the Social Security Act, as amended; plus
all claims filed for child's insurance benefits based on disability. (42 U.S.C. 405 (g))
863
DIWW
All claims filed for widows or widowers insurance benefits based on disability under Title 2 of the Social Security Act, as
amended. (42 U.S.C. 405 (g))
864
SSID
All claims for supplemental security income payments based upon disability filed under Title 16 of the Social Security Act, as
amended.
865
RSI
CV-71 (02/16)
All claims for "Black Lung" benefits under Title 4, Part B, of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. (30 U.S.C.
923)
All claims for retirement (old age) and survivors benefits under Title 2 of the Social Security Act, as amended.
(42 U.S.C. 405 (g))
CIVIL COVER SHEET
Page 3 of 3

Riot Games v. Argote - League of Legends - DMCA Complaint PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Riot Games v. Argote - League of Legends - DMCA Complaint PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Riot Games v. Argote - League of Legends - DMCA Complaint PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the lawsuit about?

What is the lawsuit about?

What is LeagueSharp and how does it threaten Riot Games?

What is LeagueSharp and how does it threaten Riot Games?

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 22 Page ID #:1

1 MARC E. MAYER (SBN 190969)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-5871

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 2 of 22 Page ID #:2

Riot Games, Inc. (Riot) alleges as follows:

Riots greatest asset is its strong community of dedicated LoL players,

Defendants (and those working in concert with them) operate a

23 cheating service called LeagueSharp (L#). L# is a service and software

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 3 of 22 Page ID #:3

L# represents an enormous threat to LoL and is causing serious and

4 irreparable harm to Riot and its valuable player community. It is absolutely

Defendants conduct is willful, deliberate, and malicious and is

As set forth herein, Defendants have engaged in numerous unlawful

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 4 of 22 Page ID #:4

1 Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(2), by selling,

Riot is entitled to monetary damages, injunctive and other equitable

10 relief, and punitive damages against Defendants.

This is a civil action seeking damages, injunctive relief, and other

14 equitable relief, under the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA, 17 U.S.C.

17 violation of the DMCA pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). Pursuant to

This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 5 of 22 Page ID #:5

1 in California, and have established a continuing presence in California. Riot is

Defendants conduct extensive and ongoing business with users in the

4 United States and the State of California;

Defendants distribute L# in the United States and the State of

Defendants have directed their unlawful activities at Riot, knowing

Defendants have entered into, and continue to enter into, hundreds or

Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 6 of 22 Page ID #:6

Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that

4 Defendant Matthias Oltmann a/k/a Joduskame is an individual residing in

Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that

9 Defendant Stefan Delgado Argote a/k/a Ohm is an individual residing in

Riot is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that

15 Defendant Tyrone Tom Pauer a/k/a Beaving is an individual residing in

Defendant Chachani Misti y Pichu Pichu S.R.L. (Chachani) is a

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 7 of 22 Page ID #:7

The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate,

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 8 of 22 Page ID #:8

FACTS APPLICABLE TO ALL CLAIMS

Riot and League of Legends

Riot is a game developer and publisher located in Los Angeles,

LoL is a fast-paced, highly competitive online game. In LoL, two

As they compete in online LoL matches, players advance in the

Case 2:16-cv-05871 Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 9 of 22 Page ID #:9

1 and interest in, the LoL community.

The success of LoL depends on Riots ability to ensure a consistently

The importance of maintaining game balance and fairness for players

14 cannot be overestimated. Because LoL is a competitive game, any perception that

Riots Ongoing Efforts To Protect League of Legends And Its Player

Community From Hackers And Cheaters

The gaming experience of legitimate LoL players is under near