Unit 1s
Unit 1s
Unit 1s
com
SRI VIDYA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
VIRUDHUNAGAR
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
CE2351-STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS-II
UNIT-I
FLEXIBILITY MATRIX METHODS
BY
Mr.R.PANDIARAJAN/AP/CIVIL
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
UNIT-1
FLEXIBILITY MATRIX METHODS
Since twentieth century, indeterminate structures are being widely used for its obvious
merits. It may be recalled that, in the case of indeterminate structures either the reactions or the
internal forces cannot be determined from equations of statics alone. In such structures, the
number of reactions or the number of internal forces exceeds the number of static equilibrium
equations. In addition to equilibrium equations, compatibility equations are used to evaluate the
unknown reactions and internal forces in statically indeterminate structure. In the analysis of
indeterminate structure it is necessary to satisfy the equilibrium equations (implying that the
structure is in equilibrium) compatibility equations (requirement if for assuring the continuity of
the structure without any breaks) and force displacement equations (the way in which
displacement are related to forces). We have two distinct method of analysis for statically
indeterminate structure depending upon how the above equations are satisfied:
1. Force method of analysis (also known as flexibility method of analysis, method of consistent
deformation, flexibility matrix method)
2. Displacement method of analysis (also known as stiffness matrix method).
In the force method of analysis, primary unknown are forces. In this method compatibility
equations are written for displacement and rotations (which are calculated by force displacement
equations). Solving these equations, redundant forces are calculated. Once the redundant forces
are calculated, the remaining reactions are evaluated by equations of equilibrium.
In the displacement method of analysis, the primary unknowns are the displacements. In this
method, first force -displacement relations are computed and subsequently equations are written
satisfying the equilibrium conditions of the structure. After determining the unknown
displacements, the other forces are calculated satisfying the compatibility conditions and force
displacement relations. The displacement-based method is amenable to computer programming
and hence the method is being widely used in the modern day structural analysis. In general, the
maximum deflection and the maximum stresses are small as compared to statically determinate
structure. For example, consider two beams of identical cross section and span carrying
uniformly distributed load as shown in Fig. 7.1a and Fig. 7.1b.
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
The loads are also the same in both cases. In the first case, the beam is fixed at both ends and
thus is statically indeterminate. The simply supported beam in Fig. 7.1b is a statically
determinate structure. The maximum bending moment in case of fixed- fixed beam is wL2/12
(which occurs at the supports) as compared to
beam. Also in the present case, the deflection in the case of fixed- fixed beam
wl4/384EI is five times smaller than that of simply supported beam
redistribution of stresses in the case of redundant structure. Hence if one member fails, structure
does not collapse suddenly. The remaining members carry the load. The determinate structural
system collapses if one member fails. However, there are disadvantages in using indeterminate
structures. Due to support settlement, there will be additional stresses in the case of redundant
structures where as determinate structures are not affected by support settlement.
The analysis of indeterminate structure differs mainly in two aspects as compared to determinate
structure.
a) To evaluate stresses in indeterminate structures, apart from sectional properties (area of cross
section and moment of inertia), elastic properties are also required.
b) Stresses are developed in indeterminate structure due to support settlements, temperature change
and fabrication errors etc.
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
Instructional Objectives
After reading this chapter the student will be
1. Able to analyse statically indeterminate structure of degree one.
2. Able to solve the problem by either treating reaction or moment as redundant.
3. Able to draw shear force and bending moment diagram for statically indeterminate beams.
4. Able to state advantages and limitations of force method of analysis.
7.1 Introduction.
In this lesson, a general introduction is given to the force method of analysis of indeterminate
structure is given. In the next lesson, this method would be applied to statically indeterminate beams.
Initially the method is introduced with the help of a simple problem and subsequently it is discussed
in detail. The flexibility method of analysis or force method of analysis (or method of consistent
deformation) was originally developed by J. Maxwell in 1864 and O. C. Mohr in 1874. Since
flexibility method requires deflection of statically determinate structure, a table of formulas for
deflections for various load cases and boundary conditions is also given in this lesson for ready use.
The force method of analysis is not convenient for computer programming as the choice of redundant
is not unique. Further, the bandwidth of the flexibility matrix in the force method is much larger than
the stiffness method. However it is very useful for hand computation.
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
INTRODUCTION:
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
The terms used in matrix method are explained first, then flexibility method and
stiffness methods are taken up.
DEGREE OF STATIC AND KINEMATIC INDETERMINACY
The number of equations required over and above the equations of static
equilibrium for the analysis of a structure is known as the degree of static
indeterminancy or degree of redundancy of the structure.
A structure is said to be kin indeterminate if the displacement components of its
joints cannot be determined by compatibility equations alone For these structures,
additional equations based on a equilibrium conditions must be formulated to
obtain the number of equations necessary for determining all the unknown
displacement components.
The number of equilibrium conditions needed to find the displacement
components of all joints of the structure is known as the degree of kinematic
indeterminacy or degree of freedom of the structure
For a beam, the degree of freedom at an end is as given below:
i) Freeend-3
ii) Simply supported / roller end - 2
iii) Hinged end iv) Fixed end- 0.
Hence, degree of kinematic indeterminacy Dk for
i) One end hinged and the other on roller = 3
ii) Propped cantilever = 2
iii) Fixed beam =O
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com