Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    McCoy v. Owens, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frankie McCoy appealed a district court ruling that denied relief on his civil rights complaint against prison officials. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    McCoy v. Owens, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Frankie McCoy appealed a district court ruling that denied relief on his civil rights complaint against prison officials. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-07-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6595

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Frankie McCoy appealed a district court ruling that denied relief on his civil rights complaint against prison officials. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    McCoy v. Owens, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frankie McCoy appealed a district court ruling that denied relief on his civil rights complaint against prison officials. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's decision. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6595

    FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES N. OWENS, CO II, Property Officer;
    ANGELA E. JOHNSON, CO II, Administrative Remedy Investigator; PAT GOINS, Classification
    Counselor; UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-942745-L)
    Submitted:

    June 20, 1996

    Decided:

    July 2, 1996

    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. McCoy v. Owens, No. CA-94-2745-L (D. Md. Mar. 27, 1996). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like