Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    United States v. Eugene Cousins, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's orders denying Eugene Ross Cousins' motion to reopen his case, deny appointment of counsel, and deny reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its opinions dated April 14, 2004 and April 28, 2014. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Eugene Cousins, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's orders denying Eugene Ross Cousins' motion to reopen his case, deny appointment of counsel, and deny reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its opinions dated April 14, 2004 and April 28, 2014. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-08-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6716

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's orders denying Eugene Ross Cousins' motion to reopen his case, deny appointment of counsel, and deny reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its opinions dated April 14, 2004 and April 28, 2014. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    United States v. Eugene Cousins, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's orders denying Eugene Ross Cousins' motion to reopen his case, deny appointment of counsel, and deny reconsideration. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its opinions dated April 14, 2004 and April 28, 2014. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6716

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    EUGENE ROSS COUSINS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
    Glen E. Conrad, Chief
    District Judge. (5:06-cr-00008-GEC-RSB-1)

    Submitted:

    July 29, 2014

    Decided:

    August 1, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eugene Ross Cousins, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb


    Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg,
    Virginia;
    Ronald
    Mitchell
    Huber,
    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eugene
    orders

    denying

    counsel

    and

    Ross
    his

    Cousins

    motion

    denying

    to

    appeals
    reopen,

    the

    denying

    reconsideration.

    record and find no reversible error.

    district

    We

    No.

    5:06-cr-00008-GEC-RSB

    Apr. 28, 2014).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    appointment

    have

    reviewed

    of
    the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.


    Cousins,

    courts

    (W.D.

    United States v.

    Va.,

    Apr.

    14,

    2004;

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like