Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Morris, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Lamont Leroy Morris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied Morris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Morris, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Lamont Leroy Morris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied Morris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-05-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6303

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Lamont Leroy Morris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied Morris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Morris, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Lamont Leroy Morris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. As a result, the appeals court denied Morris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6303

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LAMONT LEROY MORRIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CR-99-10, CA-00-196-1)

    Submitted:

    April 27, 2001

    Decided:

    May 7, 2001

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Lamont Leroy Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Lamont Leroy Morris seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find


    no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Morris, Nos. CR-99-10; CA-00-196-1 (N.D.W.
    Va. Feb. 7, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like