Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Horton v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Roy Horton filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal district court orders that denied his motion and a motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinions and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had denied Horton's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Horton v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views3 pages
    Roy Horton filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal district court orders that denied his motion and a motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinions and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had denied Horton's motions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6524

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Roy Horton filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal district court orders that denied his motion and a motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinions and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had denied Horton's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    18 views3 pages

    Horton v. United States, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Roy Horton filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal district court orders that denied his motion and a motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinions and found no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had denied Horton's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6524

    ROY HORTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, via Janet Reno,
    United States Attorney General; GARLAND
    HORACE, Deputy United States Marshal, and/or
    John Doe, Deputy United States Marshal; GARY
    BARRETT, Deputy United States Marshal; DAVID
    SMITH, Deputy United States Marshal; JERRY
    TOOTHMAN, Lieutenant, FCI, Morgantown; V. L.
    LONDON, Unit Manager, FCI, Morgantown; BRENDA
    L. FUTTEN, Case Manager, FCI, Morgantown;
    DENNIS R. BIDWELL, Warden, FCI, Morgantown;
    G. L. INGRAM, Regional Director, Bureau of
    Prisons; KATHLEEN HAWKS, Director, Bureau of
    Prisons; JAMES M. POOL, d/b/a Law Offices of
    James M. Pool; JERRY JAKE HEDRICK, Chief Jail
    Administrator; TIMOTHY L. BOWEN, Chief Jail
    Administrator;
    JACK
    ROOP,
    Director
    WVA
    Regional Jail Authority; SERGEANT CASTO,
    Correctional Officer, Central Regional Jail;
    JAMES M. HAMRICK, Records Clerk, Central
    Regional Jail; NAOMIA NESTER, Nurse, Central
    Regional Jail; BETTYE SMELLS, Nurse, Central
    Regional Jail; KATHY MCCAULEY, Counselor,
    Northern Regional Jail; KEVIN GOOD, Correctional Officer/Hearing Officer; MARTIN P.
    SHEEHAN, d/b/a Sheehan, Nuggent, and Sheehan,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior
    District Judge. (CA-97-10-1)
    Submitted:

    August 28, 1997

    Decided:

    September 17, 1997

    Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Roy Horton, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)
    and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Horton v.
    United States, No. CA-97-10-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 6, 1997 and Mar. 7,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like