Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Banoro Garrett v. R. Weiler, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Banoro Garrett filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against several defendants related to the Norfolk Police Department and Norfolk Sheriff's Office. The district court denied relief to Garrett. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Banoro Garrett v. R. Weiler, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views3 pages
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Banoro Garrett filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against several defendants related to the Norfolk Police Department and Norfolk Sheriff's Office. The district court denied relief to Garrett. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1364

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Banoro Garrett filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against several defendants related to the Norfolk Police Department and Norfolk Sheriff's Office. The district court denied relief to Garrett. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    18 views3 pages

    Banoro Garrett v. R. Weiler, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a summary of a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Banoro Garrett filed a 42 USC 1983 complaint against several defendants related to the Norfolk Police Department and Norfolk Sheriff's Office. The district court denied relief to Garrett. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1364

    BANORO GARRETT,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER; SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS; ROBERT J.
    MCCABE; LIEUTENANT BONILLA; M/DEPUTY A. MEARS; JANEL
    CUMMINGS,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    THE NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE NORFOLK SHERIFFS
    OFFICE; THE CITY OF NORFOLK; OFFICER D. A. PACIFICO;
    OFFICER H. G. WHITE; SERGEANT G. SNYDER; DEPUTY TAYLOR; L.
    WILLIS; P. BELL; J. KIDD; DARRELL HILL,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL)

    Submitted:

    July 24, 2014

    Before FLOYD and


    Circuit Judge.

    THACKER,

    Decided: July 28, 2014

    Circuit

    Judges,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    and

    DAVIS,

    Senior

    Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY


    ATTORNEYS OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia; Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN,
    CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Ruth Griggs,
    Joel Mark McCray, SANDS ANDERSON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Banoro

    Garrett

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Garrett v. Weiler, No. 2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va.

    filed Mar. 25 & entered Mar. 26, 2014).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like