Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    United States v. Paul Lee, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Paul A. Lee appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling denying Lee's petition for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Paul Lee, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Paul A. Lee appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling denying Lee's petition for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7450

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Paul A. Lee appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling denying Lee's petition for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Paul Lee, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Paul A. Lee appealed the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's ruling denying Lee's petition for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7450

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    PAUL A. LEE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
    Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-1)

    Submitted:

    February 19, 2015

    Decided:

    February 25, 2015

    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se.


    Robert Hugh McWilliams, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul

    A.

    Lee

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    Lees petition for writ of error coram nobis.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    denying

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Lee, No. 5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-1 (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 25, 2014).


    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like