Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Era Carter v. United States, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's ruling in favor of the United States on a claim of negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirms the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its August 25, 2014 opinion. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal issues are adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Era Carter v. United States, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's ruling in favor of the United States on a claim of negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirms the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its August 25, 2014 opinion. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal issues are adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-2158

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's ruling in favor of the United States on a claim of negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirms the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its August 25, 2014 opinion. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal issues are adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Era Carter v. United States, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's ruling in favor of the United States on a claim of negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirms the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its August 25, 2014 opinion. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal issues are adequately addressed in the court filings.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-2158

    ERA L. CARTER, as Executor and Personal Representative of


    the Estate of Floyd C. Carter, Jr., Deceased,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (4:13-cv-00112-MSD-TEM)

    Submitted:

    April 29, 2015

    Decided:

    May 11, 2015

    Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert T. Hall, Samantha Karyn Sledd, HALL & SETHI, PLC, Reston,
    Virginia, for Appellant.
    Dana J. Boente, United States
    Attorney, Kent P. Porter, Virginia VanValkenburg, Assistant
    United States Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Era L. Carter appeals the district courts order entering
    judgment in favor of Appellee on Carters claim for negligence
    under

    the

    (2012).
    error.

    Federal

    Claims

    Act,

    28

    U.S.C.

    2671-2680

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.
    (E.D.

    Tort

    Va.

    Aug.

    See Carter v. United States, No. 4:13-cv-112


    25,

    2014).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like