Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Vera Charlot v. Michael Donley, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vera Shepard Charlot appealed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the defendants in her lawsuit alleging defamation and violations of Title VII. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. The appeals court found no reversible error and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Vera Charlot v. Michael Donley, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views3 pages
    Vera Shepard Charlot appealed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the defendants in her lawsuit alleging defamation and violations of Title VII. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. The appeals court found no reversible error and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-02-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1650

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Vera Shepard Charlot appealed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the defendants in her lawsuit alleging defamation and violations of Title VII. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. The appeals court found no reversible error and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    15 views3 pages

    Vera Charlot v. Michael Donley, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vera Shepard Charlot appealed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the defendants in her lawsuit alleging defamation and violations of Title VII. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated. The appeals court found no reversible error and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1650

    VERA SHEPARD CHARLOT,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    HONORABLE MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Air Force,
    Defendant Appellee,
    and
    TERRY ST. PETER; DAWN M. MOORE; CLAYTON D. LEISHMAN; UNITED
    STATES OF AMERICA,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
    District Judge. (3:11-cv-00579-MBS)

    Submitted:

    January 9, 2015

    Decided:

    February 5, 2015

    Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Vera Shepard Charlot, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Vera

    Shepard

    Charlot

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and


    granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging
    defamation and multiple violations of Title VII of the Civil
    Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    Charlot v. Donley, No.

    3:11-cv-00579-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 29 & Sept. 30, 2013; Mar. 31,


    2014).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like