Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    United States v. Mackins, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Willie Mackins' appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for its consideration. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, believing them unnecessary to aid in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Mackins, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Willie Mackins' appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for its consideration. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, believing them unnecessary to aid in its decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-08-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6704

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Willie Mackins' appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for its consideration. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, believing them unnecessary to aid in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    18 views2 pages

    United States v. Mackins, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Willie Mackins' appeal of a district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for its consideration. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, believing them unnecessary to aid in its decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6704

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WILLIE JEROME MACKINS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Lacy H. Thornburg,
    District Judge. (3:97-cr-00022-LHT-4)

    Submitted:

    July 10, 2009

    Decided:

    August 3, 2009

    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Willie Jerome Mackins, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Willie

    Mackins

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18


    U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).
    no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons


    United States v. Mackins, No.

    stated by the district court.

    3:97-cr-00022-LHT-4 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2009).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like