Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    United States v. Bartlett, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Dion Kinte Bartlett's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Bartlett, Nos. CR-00-5; CA-01-274 (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2001).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Bartlett, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Dion Kinte Bartlett's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Bartlett, Nos. CR-00-5; CA-01-274 (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2001).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-07-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7863

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Dion Kinte Bartlett's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Bartlett, Nos. CR-00-5; CA-01-274 (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2001).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    13 views2 pages

    United States v. Bartlett, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Dion Kinte Bartlett's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in United States v. Bartlett, Nos. CR-00-5; CA-01-274 (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2001).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7863

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DION KINTE BARTLETT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CR-00-5, CA-01-27-4)

    Submitted:

    July 18, 2002

    Decided:

    July 23, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Dion Kinte Bartlett, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Dion Kinte Bartlett seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2002). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate

    of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court. United States v. Bartlett, Nos. CR-00-5; CA-01-274 (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like