Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 36 views

    Hewitt v. Fender, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Franklin Hewitt filed a § 1983 complaint against Doctor Fender which was denied by the district court. Hewitt appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Hewitt v. Fender, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    36 views2 pages
    Franklin Hewitt filed a § 1983 complaint against Doctor Fender which was denied by the district court. Hewitt appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6063

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Franklin Hewitt filed a § 1983 complaint against Doctor Fender which was denied by the district court. Hewitt appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    36 views2 pages

    Hewitt v. Fender, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Franklin Hewitt filed a § 1983 complaint against Doctor Fender which was denied by the district court. Hewitt appealed the denial. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6063

    FRANKLIN HEWITT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DOCTOR FENDER,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
    (CA-95-667-0-19)
    Submitted:

    July 25, 1996

    Decided:

    August 7, 1996

    Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Franklin Hewitt, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II,
    ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Hewitt v. Fender, No. CA-95-667-0-19 (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 1996).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like