Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Jose Mendez, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Manuel-Calixt Mendez's motion for modification of his sentence. Mendez appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which allows modification of sentences under certain circumstances. However, the appellate court found no reversible errors after reviewing the record. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Mendez's motion for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Jose Mendez, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Manuel-Calixt Mendez's motion for modification of his sentence. Mendez appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which allows modification of sentences under certain circumstances. However, the appellate court found no reversible errors after reviewing the record. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Mendez's motion for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-09-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6774

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Manuel-Calixt Mendez's motion for modification of his sentence. Mendez appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which allows modification of sentences under certain circumstances. However, the appellate court found no reversible errors after reviewing the record. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Mendez's motion for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Jose Mendez, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Jose Manuel-Calixt Mendez's motion for modification of his sentence. Mendez appealed the district court's ruling under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c), which allows modification of sentences under certain circumstances. However, the appellate court found no reversible errors after reviewing the record. It therefore affirmed the district court's decision to deny Mendez's motion for the reasons stated in that court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6774

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    JOSE MANUEL-CALIXT MENDEZ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (7:09-cr-00052-FL-1)

    Submitted:

    September 25, 2014

    Decided:

    September 30, 2014

    Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, DAVIS, Senior Circuit


    Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jose Manuel-Calixt Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, Joshua Bryan Royster,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jose Manuel-Calixt Mendez appeals the district courts
    order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence,
    18 U.S.C. 3582 (c) (2012).
    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    United States v. Mendez,

    No. 7:09-cr-00052-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2014).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like