Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 26 views

    Ashburn v. Cherry, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Delton Ashburn filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail. The district court denied relief and Ashburn appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case details and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Ashburn v. Cherry, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    26 views2 pages
    Delton Ashburn filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail. The district court denied relief and Ashburn appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case details and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-08-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6261

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Delton Ashburn filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail. The district court denied relief and Ashburn appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case details and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    26 views2 pages

    Ashburn v. Cherry, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Delton Ashburn filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against officials at the Hampton Roads Regional Jail. The district court denied relief and Ashburn appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling denying relief for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case details and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6261

    DELTON ASHBURN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RON CHERRY, Superintendent Hampton Roads
    Regional Jail; ERIC JONES, Lieutenant Hampton
    Roads Regional Jail; TONYA HATCHETT, Captain
    Hampton Roads Regional Jail; BLOSO KALONGO;
    RALPH ABLASEAU; NSEKENNE KOLONGO, Doctors
    Hampton Roads Regional Jail,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
    Judge. (1:06-cv-00935-LMB)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2007

    Decided:

    August 16, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Delton Ashburn, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich,
    PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Coreen Antoinette
    Bromfield, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Delton Ashburn appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    See Ashburn v.

    Cherry, No. 1:06-cv-00935-LMB (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 23, 2007;


    entered Jan. 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like