Debate Opinion

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Jonarissa L.

Beltran
29, 2016
Tax 402
MTh

February
10:30-12:00

OPINION ABOUT PILIPINAS DEBATE 2016


I was satisfied by what I have witnessed in the debate. What Senator
Miriam said was really true. The debate was neither a personality contest nor
a show for entertainment. The debate was a show to educate voters. It was
an event that has huge influences on the nation because it allows the
candidates to make their impression on such a large audience.
As what I have observed, it was Senator Grace Poe who came
prepared. She played well with statistics as her response in whatever
questions being thrown to her. I really find that method very intelligent
because playing with statistics is like being neutral.
Roxas said something about choosing a president is like recruiting a
family driver: Kung ihahambing natin ang pagpili ng pangulo sa sino ang
magmamaneho sa ating mga anak sa araw-araw, kanino natin
ipagkakatiwala? Sa taong may kaso, sa taong mainitin ang ulo, sa taong
ngayon pa lang natututo magmaneho, o sa taong ni minsan hindi kayo
ipinahamak?this statement is like a slap in the face for the other
Presidentiables. But well, he needs to appear as if he is suits to be in the
position thats why he said that.
Throughout the debate, Binay kept on emphasizing the need for a
decisive leadership in the government, and would frequently cite his
achievements as the leader of Makati for more than two decades. Why is it
like that? I mean he only mentioned the achievements as he was the Mayor
of Makati, how about his achievements as the Vice President? Is there any?
Also, Binay seemed to be more interested on attacking his election
opponents and defending himself from allegations than providing concrete
solutions to national issues.
As for Senator Miriam, her experience and intelligence was very
evident in the debate. However, I dont really think her stand about lowering
sub-taxes such as estate tax to avoid aggravating the poorer half of the
country is the best solution. Only those rich people have estate tax, so I
dont think the poor can really benefit from this.
Mayor Duterte displayed a fierceness and down-to-earth approach,
however, his answers to the issues were too vague. His plans for every issue
revolves around his ideal strategy of eradicating crime and poverty in 3 to 6
months.

I hope that in the next debate, there will be no tv advertisement and


there should be an extended talk and better debatable topics so that the
people can really criticize on who should be the next President of our country.

You might also like