Innovative in Vitro Methodologies For Establishing Therapeutic Equivalence
Innovative in Vitro Methodologies For Establishing Therapeutic Equivalence
Innovative in Vitro Methodologies For Establishing Therapeutic Equivalence
Suggested citation
Murray L, Arias A, Li J, Bhoopathy S, Hidalgo IJ. Innovative in vitro methodologies for establishing
therapeutic equivalence. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016;40(1):2328.
ABSTRACT
To improve the quality of pharmaceutical products in their markets, several Latin American
countries have begun to require that new generic products demonstrate bioequivalence against
innovator or reference products. However, given the number of products involved, it is not
feasible to rely on clinical studies to comply with this requirement. Instead, it makes sense to
adopt or develop strategies that are appropriate to the characteristics of the region.
To streamline drug development and accelerate patients access to quality drug products,
15years ago the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to grant
exemptions from clinical bioequivalence studies (i.e., biowaivers) for certain types of drug
products based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). Biowaivers can
significantly reduce development time and cost and can also prevent unnecessary human
exposure to potentially dangerous drugs while providing a robust, consistent standard for
therapeutic equivalence of generic drug products.
In addition, the limited success of translating in vitro dissolution data into in vivo
performance can be enhanced using innovative tools such as the in vitro dissolution and
absorption systems (IDAS). By integrating in vitro dissolution and permeability tests, these
systems can provide useful insights for formulation development. A thorough assessment of the
potential of in vitro techniques, along with formalization of their use through regulatory
science initiatives when appropriate, may lead to cost-effective tools to help address some of the
quality and regulatory challenges faced in the Latin American and Caribbean region.
Key words
23
Brief communication
Establishing Equivalence of
Generic Drug Products
The United States Food and Drug
dministration (FDA) and its counter
A
parts in all highly regulated pharmaceu
tical markets demand that generic drug
products meet the same standards of
quality, efficacy, and safety as their refer
ence listed drug (RLD) counterparts.
Consistent with this premise, procedures
have been established to demonstrate
that generic products are therapeutically
equivalent and interchangeable with
RLDs. Therapeutic equivalence (TE) is
generally achieved by assuring pharma
ceutical equivalence (PE) and bioequiva
lence (BE) of the generic to the RLD
products (3). Because implementation of
BE requirements based on clinical stud
ies would be prohibitively expensive,
there is an incentive to develop or iden
tify in vitro methods that can be used to
evaluate and monitor the registration
lots and also ensure the inter-lot consis
tency of a product.
24
Biopharmaceutics Classification
System
The BCS provides a scientific frame
work for drug classification based on
measurements of drug solubility and
permeability, the primary determinants
of drug absorption, and serves as an im
portant tool for the application of in vitro
measurements in support of BE require
ments. The BCS is an excellent example
of a successful regulatory initiative that
has resulted in biowaivers, exemptions
from clinical BE studies, for dozens of
oral products. For over 15 years, the FDA
permitted biowaivers for Class I drugs in
rapidly dissolving immediate-release
solid oral dosage forms (5), and in the re
cently updated BCS guidelines (6) it ex
panded biowaiver eligibility to Class III
drugs. According to a recent survey,
Classes I and III combined account for
63% of the top 200 selling drugs (7), sug
gesting that full implementation of the
BCS could result in a major reduction in
the number of clinical BE studies. In ad
dition to reducing costs, in vitro studies
prevent unnecessary exposure of healthy
subjects to potentially adverse drug
events and even deaths (7, 8) without
compromising the high quality stan
dards necessary to safeguard public
safety.
Brief communication
FIGURE 1. (A) Schematic representation of the in vitro dissolution absorption system 1 (IDAS1); (B) correlation between IDAS1
dissolution and permeability values, depicted as percent per 2 hours, and in vivo human absorption
(A)
(B)
Drug
Sampling
Mucosal
Solution
Stirring Bar
Caco-2 Monolayer
Sampling
Serosal
Solution
Stirring Bar
Drugs
BCS
Class
%Diss.
(in 2h)
%Perm.
(in 2h)
%Abs.
Warfarin Sodium
II
100
27.5
93.5
Piroxicam
II
90
26.9
95
Amlodipine
I/III
100
6.78
6490
Atenolol
III
100
0.23
50
Carbamazepine
II
86.1
10.2
83
Albendazole
II
0.45
0.42
20
Ranitidine
III
100
0.15
50
Simvastatin
II
46.2
11.0
73
Ketoprofen
II
98.2
22.8
85
formulation development
and/or characterization.
The IDAS1 device also makes it possi
ble to obtain dissolution/absorption
profiles for candidate formulations.
allow
25
Brief communication
Figure 2. (A) Schematic representation of the in vitro dissolution absorption system 2 (IDAS2); (B) dissolution profiles of propranolol and warfarin tablets, as percent of dose over time; (C) permeation profiles of propranolol and warfarin associated with the
dissolution of their respective tablets
(B) Dissolution
(A)
120
Drug
100
Sampling
% of Dose
Sampling
Sampling
80
60
Propranolol
Warfarin
40
20
0
5
15
30
60
90
120
90
120
Time (min)
(C) Permeation
14
12
% of Dose
Permeation Chamber
Caco-2 Monolayer
8
6
4
2
Stirring Paddle
26
Propranolol
Warfarin
10
Dissolution Vessel
0
5
15
30
60
Time (min)
Brief communication
REFERENCES
1. Bogdanich W, Hooker J. From China to
Panama, a trail of poisoned medicine. The
New York Times, 6 May 2007.
2. Almanza C, Nez E. MP oficializa que
muerte de neonatos fue a causa de hepa
rina. La Prensa [Panam], 6 June 2014.
3. Bhoopathy S, Silchenko S, Wang X, Murray
L. Strategies for the equivalence assess
ment of locally acting complex drug prod
ucts: focus on alternative methodologies.
AAPS Newsmagazine. 2015;18(2):1216.
4.
Nainar S, Rajiah K, Angamuthu S,
Prabakaran D, Kasibhatta R. Biopharma
ceutical classification system in in vitro/in
vivo correlation: concept and d
evelopment
strategies in drug delivery. Trop J Pharm
Res. 2012;11(2):319329.
5. US Department of Health and Human
Services, Food and Drug Administration.
Guidance for Industry: Waiver of in vivo
bioavailability and bioequivalence studies
for immediate-release solid oral dosage
forms based on a biopharmaceutics classi
fication system. Silver Spring, MD: Food
and Drug Administration; 2000.
6. US Department of Health and Human
Services, Food and Drug Administration.
Guidance for Industry: Waiver of in vivo
bioavailability and bioequivalence studies
for immediate-release solid oral dosage
forms based on a biopharmaceutics classi
fication system. Silver Spring, MD: Food
and Drug Administration; 2015.
7. Cook JA, Davit BM, Polli JE. Impact of bio
pharmaceutics classification system-based
biowaivers. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2010;7(5):
15391544.
8. Tampal N, Mandula H, Zhang H, Li BV,
Nguyen H, Conner DP. Biopharmaceutics
27
Brief communication
RESUMEN
Mtodos in vitro
innovadores para determinar
la equivalencia teraputica
Palabras clave
28