This document discusses food quality from the consumer's perspective. It finds that quality is difficult to define and depends on who is asked. For consumers, quality means different things like taste, nutrition, safety and appearance. The document analyzes 500 questions asked to a university, finding that over half were about food preparation, a third about nutrition, and the rest about safety, labeling and other topics. It concludes that quality to consumers means acceptable characteristics like tenderness, crispness and taste that meet their standards.
This document discusses food quality from the consumer's perspective. It finds that quality is difficult to define and depends on who is asked. For consumers, quality means different things like taste, nutrition, safety and appearance. The document analyzes 500 questions asked to a university, finding that over half were about food preparation, a third about nutrition, and the rest about safety, labeling and other topics. It concludes that quality to consumers means acceptable characteristics like tenderness, crispness and taste that meet their standards.
This document discusses food quality from the consumer's perspective. It finds that quality is difficult to define and depends on who is asked. For consumers, quality means different things like taste, nutrition, safety and appearance. The document analyzes 500 questions asked to a university, finding that over half were about food preparation, a third about nutrition, and the rest about safety, labeling and other topics. It concludes that quality to consumers means acceptable characteristics like tenderness, crispness and taste that meet their standards.
This document discusses food quality from the consumer's perspective. It finds that quality is difficult to define and depends on who is asked. For consumers, quality means different things like taste, nutrition, safety and appearance. The document analyzes 500 questions asked to a university, finding that over half were about food preparation, a third about nutrition, and the rest about safety, labeling and other topics. It concludes that quality to consumers means acceptable characteristics like tenderness, crispness and taste that meet their standards.
by Marie Ferree University of California Berkeley, California
Presents the various aspects of
food quality from the consumers viewpoint.
Its a nice tidy
What is food quality? Iittlequestion withas many answers as there are people to give them, To come up with a workable answer, Isearched through the files, discussed the question of quality with some consumers and I even gave the subject some thought. And I found an answer in the form quality? of a question. What is food Quality of what, and according to whom? Definitions of quality include the precise: Thedistinctivet rait, characteristic, capacity or virtue of a product that sets it apart from all others. Quality, according to the 1970 Yearbook of Agriculture, is the measure or expression of goodness. When I asked one homemaker what quality meant to her she said, Ask my neighbor she really knows quality food. A definition of quality I picked up while attending an industry meeting is Quality is what you think the competition thinks the standard is. Put still another way quality turns out to be the standard the consumer will accept. There is little need to emphasize the point that family and institutional food buyers have a somewhat different set of quality standards from that of other buyers within the food production and distribution system. Concerns of people involved in food production, processing and distribution include selection and use of plants and animals which will produce characteristics of performance excellence related toharvesting, shipping, processing, and shelf life, Characteristics of performance excellence do, of February 73/page 34
course, include factors of food safety and
I say of course there is nutritive valued concern for food safety and nutritive value although, there seems to be considerable difficulty proving concern for either when confronted by consumer advocates. Food buyers are concerned about some of these same characteristics of excellence. Lacking the They express them differently, objective measuring devices of other segments of the production, processing and distribution system, consumers rely on judgments of color, feel texture, odor, sound and the written word. When the opportunity presents itself, the food buyer may also take advantage of the judgment of taste. We have been told, at times in rather strident tones, that consumers chief concerns relate to food safety and nutritive value: --
.-
--
That consumers fear nutritive
value is lost in processing and no attempt is made to restore it. That nutrients and other food ingredients are added to foods far beyond safe limits. That pesticide, herbicide, and recently, that some hormone residues are present in the food Supply.
I did a count of questions that come
into our Public Service Department and discovered that of 500 questions over the past 10 months, 400 of them were directly concerned with food. Presumably, these 400 questions should give some clues to what concerns consu-mers. Bear in mind, please, this Public Service Department is located at the University of California, Berkeley, where all sorts of craziness, food craziness included, is reputed to have its roots. Journal of Food Distribution Research
A little more than half the questions
asked, 56%, were direct requests for howHOW can I pickle olives? was to-do-it. the question asked most often. what can I Other questions included: do with a tree full of lemons? Can I freeze coconut? Could you sendme a recipe for baking a whole sa.lmon?r About 33%of the questions were directly Where can I get concerned with nutrition: a list of the nutritive value of different foods?rr rArevitamins in pills the same as vitamins in food?rr rrwhat cheeses are low in fat?rr rHow many calories in Ricotta cheese and in cottage cheese?r concernqd About 5% of the questions rMygrandmother dies recently food safety: and left a large number of cans of home canned pickles, fruits and vegetables. . . are they safe to eat? Are juniper berries safe to eat? How can you tell if tuna is My freezer contaminated with botulism? was off for two days. . can I refreeze the vegetables and pork chops?r concerned About 3% of the questions meat grades and labeling: Is a meat market allowed to package round steak cut in small pieces, label it stroganoff beef and sell it for a higher price than the piece of rWhat is the round steak in one piece?r How much fat is in best grade of beef? regular ground beef in the supermarket? It was difficult to classify 3% of the What is a kiwi?r Where can I questions: buy eels? and Are guinea pigs edible? Im still not sure Was it a pig question. Nutrition? Preparation? pig had become a storage
about the guinea
problem of safety? Maybe the quinea problem.
Food buyers have specific performance
expectations for food: they expect meat to salad be tender when cooked; they expect greens tobe crisp; they expect the packaged flour mix to turn out a product that is acceptable to the family or clientele; they expect canned peaches to live up to the descriptive label; they expect frozen dinners to satisfy the appetite.
Journal of Food Distribution Research
Food buyers put a high priority on eye
Well appeal of fresh foods in the market. colored fruits and vegetables, uniform sizes and products that are free of any kind of damage will get agood rating from most food Yet they know intuitively or by buyers . whatever sixth sense food buyers use, that color isnt the reliable guide to quality. never If you dont~elieve it you have watched food buyers perform their food buying chores. Because color and uniformsize get considerable emphasis from other segments of the marketing system, consumers perhaps give these two factors a little too much emphasis Exterior color but that is the way it is. often has little to do with whats inside and uniform sizes do not indicate how good But what other factors or bad a food is. can the food buyer judge? At the meat counter, the food buyer relies on the reputation of the food store or on grades, or brand names as guides to When you dig into food shoppers quality. judgments of meat quality factors, you get a mixed bag and they may or may not match government and industrys judgment. We are all familiar with the studies done of consumer preferences for beef, in which the preference turns out to result from the halo effect of the word Choice, rather than any accurate judgment of quality on the part of the food shopper. tastes, Palatability, the way food ranks high on the family and institutional foodbuyers list of quality standards. Yet, this is one quality factor the buyer can rarely judge until after the sales transaction. Indeed, there are maturity standards for practically everything that grows--livestock, poultry, cereal, fruits and vegetables. The standards relate, or are supposed to, to palatability, And there are palatability standards for processed foods. But the standards lose something in the translation. Immature fruits and vegetables still appear in the market; overmature peas, beans and cornare still processed; the word rseasoningr on the package labels of processed foods (especially mixtures) translates too much salt.
February 73/page
35
So what is quality? Quality of food
includes all those characteristics of excellence that make it acceptable to the food buyer. The fact that food quality turns out to be the standard consumers will accept doesnt have to be a bad thing. The majority of consumers find acceptable product quality in the market, They must, estimates vary, but it appears that shoppers in food markets make choices at the rate of about 4 per second. Shoppers do take sanitation and safety of food pretty much for granted. Another measure of how well quality standards meet consumers expectations is that it has taken 20 years to get a real consumer movement under way. And we arent hearing the majority of consumers, we hear the crusaders, those who will save us in spite of ourselves. What they advocate is good. But the results of the crusade were obvious a long time ago. And the decisions
that have brought nutrition labeling, inmeasure
gredient labeling and price per should have been made without the high pressure and invective that finally precipitated them. And if you think all this additional information is the end to making better food shoppers-- you are wrong. We may be better educated, more sophisticated and have access to a better commodity system. It will be well worthwhile, starting now, to listen more closely to the real consumers . Hear them when they say they like want fresh strawberries that taste that fresh strawberries, fresh tomatoes taste like fresh tomatoes, and ripe peaches, plums and melons. If you insist that little can be done in guaranteeing good flavor characteristics of fresh foods my only reaction is why not?