Effect of Counseling On Nutritional Status
Effect of Counseling On Nutritional Status
Effect of Counseling On Nutritional Status
Original Article
ABSTRACT
Objective. To assess the nutritional status and dietary practices among underprivileged pregnant women, identify the lacune,
outline implement and assess the effect of nutritional counseling on their dietary intake, anthropometric status and anemia
status.
Methods. Hundred pregnant women belonging to low socio-economic status were interviewed. Based on lacune, nutrition
education (NE) was given in the form of simple messages to 50 subjects (NE-group) over 10-16 weeks period, while the
remaining 50 formed the comparison group (Non-NE group). Tools used were individual counseling, weekly home visits and
group meetings. Anthropometric measurements taken were height and weight. Dietary data was collected using 24-hour recall
and food frequency questionnaire. Hemoglobin estimation was done. Effect of intervention was assessed by monitoring
changes in dietary practices, weight gain, and nutritional status of the subjects.
Results. Baseline findings- low mean maternal body weight (51.05 7.26 kg), 96.3% anemia prevalence and severely sub
optimal dietary intakes. Post-NE results revealed a significant increase in quality and quantity of the diets consumed. Mean
hemoglobin levels significantly increased (Post-NE vs Non-NE = 9.65 0.97 vs 7.85 1.58, p<0.001) and anemia prevalence
reduced (Post-NE vs Non-NE = 78.7% vs 96%) in post-NE group.
Conclusion. Individual counseling with weekly reinforcement can bring about improvement in nutritional status during
pregnancy. [Indian J Pediatr 2006; 73 (8) : 687-692]
50
51
Fig 1. Mean percentage of recommendations met by the study populalation for different food stuffs and nutrition (Middle gestation: n=50;
Late gestation: n=50)
689
52
Intervention group
Pre-NE (n=50)
Post-NE (n=46)
Cereals
Pulses
Roots &Tubers
GLVs
Other vegetables
Fruits
Milk
Visible Fat
Sugar
Meats
133.40 (44.39)
10.36 (14.67)
44.00 (41.35)
13.90 (33.55)
22.60 (31.15)
39.50 (62.05)
187.10 (210.78)
12.06 (6.33)
9.85 (5.54)
4.0 (19.79)
1
2
P1
Non-NE group
(n=50)
201.26 (36.12)
20.43 (23.77)
73.80 (58.42)
49.34 (58.30)
17.39 (28.47)
123.15 (88.24)
378.80 (244.74)
17.82 (6.98)
13.64 (6.90)
10.86 (36.38)
122.90 (54.24)
13.82 (16.87)
36.30 (42.04)
12.90 (30.97)
17.20 (27.03)
31.20 (65.67)
163.70 (174.10)
11.07 (6.58)
10.26 (6.73)
2.00 (9.89)
<0.001
<0.05
<0.05
<0.001
NS
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
NS
NS
P2
<0.001
NS
<0.001
<0.001
NS
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.05
NS
TABLE 2. Mean (SD) Daily Intake of Nutrients of the Subjects in the Intervention Group at Pre, Post-NE and Non-NE Group.
Nutrients
Intervention group
Pre-NE (n=50)
Post-NE (n=46)
Non-NE group
(n=50)
Energy (Kcal)
Protein (g)
Calcium (mg)
Iron (mg)
Vitamin C (mg)
Vitamin A (RE)
924.69
27.88
486.84
8.59
23.84
282.57
835.14 (324.45)
25.00 (10.60)
381.96 (301.65)
7.98 (3.97)
23.50 (44.77)
238.39 (330.86)
1
2
(344.06)
(12.24)
(431.22)
(3.80)
(16.14)
(378.87)
1521.28 (303.45)
48.05 (11.08)
956.21 (434.72)
16.35 (5.22)
219.38 (178.05)
728.68 (568.01)
P1
P2
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Non-NE (n=35)
Pre-NE (n=47)
Post-NE (n=41)
5.7
25.7
31.4
34.2
2.9
2.1
48.9
42.6
6.4
0
12.2
58.5
29.2
0
0
2.1
6.5
8.6
2.1
6.5
8.6
10.8
6.5
13.0
34.7
53
691
54
692
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.