Slabs: One-Way Slab (Simply Supported Slab)

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses different types of slabs like one-way slabs, two-way slabs, ribbed slabs, and sandwich slabs. It also discusses the reinforcement details and rules for slab reinforcement.

The different types of slab reinforcement discussed are primary reinforcement, secondary or distribution reinforcement, and support reinforcement.

Some rules mentioned for detailing slab reinforcement are related to the length of reinforcement, anchorage length, bending reinforcement at supports, and the precedence of formwork drawings over empirical rules.

Slabs

The general concepts regarding slabs


were explained in paragraph 1.2.3 while
the concepts regarding their behavior were
explained in paragraph 1.4.1. This
paragraph refers to the rules concerning
the slab reinforcement.
One-way slab (simply supported slab)
The following describe the way to reinforce
a one-way (simply supported) slab.

The structural frame consists of four columns, two


beams and one slab "project: slabs10 "

The one-way slab is supported by two beams.

The example regards slab S1 which is 180


mm thick, its primary dimension is equal to
0.30+3.80+0.30=4.40 m and its secondary

dimension to 5.0 m. The slab sits upon


beams b1 and b2 which are supported by
column pairs C2, C4 and C1, C3
respectively.
Usually, when a slab sits upon a beam the
support is considered to be pinned.
The following figure is called carpenters
formwork[*]

NoteFormwork is the term given to moulds into which the

concrete is poured. The wooden formwork is built on site out of timber. The formwork
drawings are allocated for two specific uses: a) the creation of the formwork by the
carpenter and thus it is called carpenters formwork draw-ing and b) the steel
reinforcement implementation by the installer which is called installerrs formwork

drawing . It symbolically illustrates the


structural frame of reinforced concrete.
drawing.

The carpenters formwork drawing regards the


formation of the slabs moulds

Behavior and reinforcement of one-way slab

The installers formwork drawing regards the


slabs reinforcement

The slab of the above example has four


types of reinforcement:
1st) primary reinforcement
In a one-way slab the need for
reinforcement appears mainly in the span
and towards the bending direction. The

necessary bars are placed based on the


amount of the calcu-lated required
reinforcement. In this specific case the
provided bars are 10/100. This means
that 10 rebars have been placed every [*]
NoteThe reinforcement in slabs is calculated per 1m of width. In this specific
example, in every 1 m (1000 mm) of slab width there are 1000/100=10 rebars. The
10 rebar has a cross-sectional area of *d2/4=*1.02/4=78.5 mm2 and therefore, the
total amount of reinforcement placed in 1m is 10bars*78.5=785 mm2. This value can
be taken directly from table 3.

100 mm.

2nd) secondary reinforcement or


distribution reinforcement
Apart from the primary reinforcement that
is placed parallel to the deformation
direction, there is also need for
reinforcement in the secondary direction.
In that direction, the placed rebars are
8/240 which means that bars with a 8
diameter have been placed every [*]

NoteThe

8 rebar has a cross-sectional area equal to *82/4=50.3 mm2. The rebars placed in
1m are 1000/240=4.17 consequently, the total amount of secondary reinforcement is

4.17*50.3=210 mm2/m. This value can also be taken directly from table 3 in *
8/120

240 mm.

3rd) free edge reinforcement


The free edges of slabs are more
susceptible to stresses and therefore,
hairpin reinforcement is placed in these
areas. Its proper position is secured by
means of two bars placed inside its
corners.
Hairpin reinforcement is easily formed by a
folded wire mesh (see and paragraph
2.6.1).

4th) support reinforcement

The minimum required reinforcement in


the support areas is provided by two ways:
1st way: Half the span rebars i.e. 10/200
are shaped with bends at their ends (in
every two bars one is straight and one is
bend-up). The other half span rebars are
formed with a straight length. That way has
been followed in this specific example.
2nd way: All span rebars i.e. 10/100 are
manufactured and implemented with a
straight length while in the upper part of
the support areas additional straight rebars
are placed.

Calculation of the bent-up part of a rebar If the


slabs thickness is 180 mm, then the bent-up part
will have a length equal to: (180-35-35)*2=
110*1.4=160 mm

For an effortless and economical


implementation, when using straight-length
rebars it is obliga-tory to use industrial wire
fabric reinforcement as shown in the
following figure.

Reinforcing the one-way slab of the above


example by means of straight-length bars
"project: slabs15"

In case a slab is reinforced only with


straight-length bars which, as a rule,
means reinforcement with wire fabrics, the
installers formwork drawing is shown in
the image below.

The installers formwork drawing of a one-way


slab, reinforced with straight-length bars

Two-way slab
If two beams are added under the free
edges of the slab in the previous example,
then the slab S1 becomes a two-way slab.

The two-way slab S1 is supported by four beams


"project: slabs20"

The behavior of a two-way slab is similar


to that of a one-way slab the only
difference is that the former works in both
directions.
The reinforcement rules are also similar in
both directions.

Behavior of a two-way slab

The installers formwork drawing of a two-way


slab

For reasons regarding behavior, safety and


economical design, the two-way slab is far
more efficient than the equivalent one-way
slab[*]

NoteThe two-way slab of the example, with the same dimensions and

the same applied loads as those in the one-way slab, requires reinforcement equal to
8/150 in the primary (most heavily loaded) direction and 8/190 in the secondary
direction. The primary direction reinforcement 8/150, is equal to 335 mm2/m (from
table 3) which corresponds only to 43% of the reinforcement required in the equivalent
one-way slab which is equal to 785 mm2/m.

One-way slab connected to a cantilever

The behavior and the reinforcement of a


one-way slab connected to a cantilever are
described below. If the first slab is a twoway slab both the behavior and the
reinforcement rules are ana-logous.

One-way slab connected to a cantilever "project:


slabs30"

Behavior and reinforcement of a one-way slab


connected to a cantilever slab

Note:
The bars shown at this example constitute
the primary and the secondary
reinforcement re-quired by the static
calculations. They are placed in parts of
the lower and upper slab surfaces and
they secure the structures strength
against the primary loads defined by the
regulations. However, apart from the
primary loads there often are incalculable
loads that cause less in-tense, secondary
stresses. These are successfully carried in
areas with reinforcement while in all other
areas they cause the formation of cracks.
These type of stresses, except from concretes drying shrinkage, are differential

deformations caused by sudden


differential stressing, e.g. the placement of
building materials upon a part of a slab,
mainly though they are deforma-tions
caused by earthquake forces. The
cracking does not affect the structures
strength but it arises serviceability and
aesthetic issues. The crackings control
can be achieved by an addi-tional
light coherence reinforcement [*]

NoteThe

coherence reinforcement is analogous to the surface reinforcement which is


required by all regulations only for cracking prevention, when due to adverse
environmental conditions present throughout the structures service life, there is a

placed at the lower and


upper slabs surfaces in the ar-eas that
remain unreinforced.
large reinforcement cover depth.

In the upper floor slabs and generally,


during the construction stage, in all
weather-exposed slabs it is almost
mandatory to place a light wire mesh so as
to avoid the cracking caused main-ly due

to the weather conditions present


throughout the buildings construction.

The coherence reinforcement is provided


by a light industrial wire fabric
reinforcement e.g. 131, placed at the
lower surface of the cantilever slabs and at
the upper part of the slabs span which
does not have primary reinforcement, as
shown at the above figure.
The coherence reinforcements cover
depth is secured as shown also in 2.6.1.

Continuous slab connected to a


cantilever
In the case of three continuous slabs the
third of which is a cantilever, the behavior

and the rein-forcement have the following


form.

Two continuous one-way slabs connected to a


cantilever "project: slabs40"

Continuous slabs connected to a cantilever slab

Ribbed slabs
The ribbed slab (or Zoellner slab) is
something between a slab and sum of
beams. Generally, during a seismic event
ribbed slabs, like rigid ones, are not
stressed along the vertical direction
therefore, their reinforcement is practically
independent of the earthquake forces.

The rib reinforcement follows the same


rules as the beam reinforcement. However,
mainly as far as the stirrups are
concerned, the amount of placed rebars is
not as large as it is in beams. Between the
ribs, the slab is usually reinforced with a
common wire fabric reinforcement [*]
NoteSince slabs are not considered to carry earthquake loads, industrial wire fabric
reinforcement B500A (according to table 2) can be used in order to provide both the
slab reinforcement and the ribs stirrups. In this specific example, a 196 ( 5/100)
wire mesh could be used for the slab reinforcement and a 188 ( 6/150) wire mesh
could be used for the formation of the ribs stirrups.

Reinforcement details of a ribbed slab

When the ribbed slab is connected to other


slabs (as it commonly is), the support
areas are re-quired to withstand severe
moments and shear forces, therefore the
ribs width is preferred be greater than e.g.
200 mm.
Sandwich-voided slabs
In reality, sandwich-voided slabs are ribbed
slabs with a slab placed both on their
upper and lower surface.
Sandwich slabs may have the
disadvantage of a larger weight compared
to the ribbed ones but on the other hand,

they have the advantage that their spans


and supports behave in the same proper
way. Their construction is more demanding
than that of the common ribbed slabs but
at the same time, they have the advantage
of a uniform, solid lower surface.
As shown bellow, the only difference
between the prior mentioned ribbed slab
left as it is and the prior mentioned ribbed
slab but calculated and constructed as a
sandwich slab, is the differ-ent sections.
Generally, it is advised to use sandwich
slabs only in cases of large slab thickness.

Reinforcement details of a sandwich-voided slab

RULES FOR THE DETAILING OF SLAB


REBARS
This paragraph refers to some of the rules
that one should follow when bending slab
rebars. These rules apply to both one-way
and two-way slabs, with usual lengths and
commonly ap-plied loads and only when
the reinforcement detailing is not provided
by another more accurate way.

In one-way slabs, the length l is equal to


the distance between the two edges upon
which the slabs are supported.
In two-way slabs, the length l is regarded
equal to the smaller dimension of the slab.

In cantilever slabs, the length l equals the


distance between the support and the
opposite free edge of the slab.
When a slabs support is considered
fixed, the previous corresponding rules
apply.
When the lower rebars are being bent in
order to provide support reinforcement, the
straight created upper horizontal part must
be extended by the anchorage length.
The anchorage length of the rebar
(dashed line) is directly proportional to the
diameter and the concrete strength
class and reversely proportional to the
steel class. In usual cases the anchorage
length is in the order of 350 mm. The use
of industrial wire mesh is 30% more
favorable for the anchorage length.
Bending the rebar at 90 or 135 in the
edges of pin supports is positive for the

proper be-havior of slabs. However, as a


rule, it is not necessary especially in high
concrete grades.
If the formwork drawings contain specific
dimensions of the reinforcement bars
detailing then these predominate over the
above mentioned empirical rules.

You might also like