ME 4232: Fluid Power Controls Lab: Class #6 Hydraulic Pumps

ME 4232:
FLUID POWER CONTROLS LAB

Class #6
Hydraulic Pumps
Notes
Next Friday:
Van de Ven Traveling
Servo Hydraulic Overview & System Dynamics Review
Upcoming Labs:
Lab 11/12: Synchronous / Asynchronous &
Tandem / Parallel Connections
Lab 13: Power Steering
Lab 14: Integrated Lab (Part I)
2
Agenda
Feedback: Lab Sections
Power Steering Valve
Pump Classification
Positive Displacement Types
Pump Theory
Flow Ripple
Inefficiencies
Aeration/Cavitation
Hydrostatic Transmissions
Types / Characteristics
Hybrid Vehicle Architectures
3
Feedback: Lab Sections

Overall Going Well
Helpful / Knowledgeable TAs (right amount of guidance)
Issues:
Some labs tight on time
Sometimes confusion
Lab assignments vague
Power Steering Valve (Lab 13)

Open center steering
Power beyond steering
Pumps - Introduction
Non-Positive Displacement Pump
Types of Positive Displacement Pumps

Gear pump (fixed displacement)
internal gear (gerotor)
external gear
Vane pump
fixed or variable displacement
pressure compensated
Piston pump
axial design
radial design
bent-axis design
External Gear Pump

Driving gear and driven gear
Fluid trapped between gear
teeth and housing
Gerotor pump
Inlet port
Outlet port
Internal/External Gear Pair

Inexpensive
Low-Pressure Applications
Low Flow (0.1 11.5 in3)
10
Vane Pump
Vanes in slots in rotor
Vanes loaded against
cam ring
Eccentricity determines
displacement
Quiet
Limited Pressure
11
Pressure Compensated Vane Pump
12 curve
Spring determines P-Q
Axial Piston Pump

Pistons rotate with cylinder
block
Pistons translate against swash
plate
Displacement determined by
swash plate angle
Fluid enters/exits through valve
plate
13
Radial Piston Pump

Cam moves pistons radially
Displacement determined by
cam profile
Displacement variation can be
achieved by moving the cam
(not common)
High pressure capable, and
efficient
Pancake profile
14
Bent Axis Pump
Drive shaft coupled to cylinder block

Stationary valve plate
Low piston side load
High efficiency
15
Pumping Theory - Flow Ripple
16
Pumping Theory Power Variable Calculations
17
Pumping Theory Efficiency
18
19
Aeration and Cavitation

Disastrous Events
Aeration
air bubbles enter pump at low
pressure side
Cavitation
Dissolved air cavitation
Vapor cavitation
Bubbles expand in low pressure

Bubbles collapse in high
pressure
Micro-jets formed Rapid
Erosion
20
Cavitation Video
21
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMDAw0TXvUo
Hydraulic Motor / Actuator

Hydraulic motors / actuators are basically
pumps run in reverse
Input = hydraulic power
Output = mechanical power
22
Hydrostatic Transmission
23
Closed Circuit Hydrostatic Trans
24
General Consideration - Hydrostats

Advantages:
Wide range of operating speeds/torque

Infinite gear ratios - continuous variable transmission (CVT)
High power, low inertia (relative to mechanical transmission)
Dynamic braking via relief valve
Engine does not stall
No interruption to power when shifting gear
Disadvantage:
Lower energy efficiency (80% versus 92%+ for mechanical
transmission)
Leaks !
25
Hydraulic Hybrid Vehicle Circuits

Series
Parallel
Pros:
Retains existing mechanical drive train
Cons:
Does not allow optimal engine
management
Pros:
Allows optimal engine management
Four-Wheel Drive Capable
Independent Wheel Torque Control
Cons:
Hydraulic Efficiency Losses
Pump/Motor Operation
26
Hydraulic Accumulators
Energy Storage Device
Oil Compresses a Pre-Charged Gas (Nitrogen)
27
Hydro-Mech w/ Wheel Torque Control

Accumulator
Planetary
Differential
Axle
Gearbox
Engine
Clutch
Mechanical
Transmission
High Efficiency & Decoupling

2 Power Paths: Mechanical & Hydraulic
Leverage Highly Efficient Mechanical Branch
Infinite Speed Variability with Hydraulic Branch
Independent Wheel Torque Control

28
Hydraulic Transformer
Q1
Q2
Used to change pressure in a power

conservative way
Pressure boost or buck is accompanied by
proportionate flow decrease and increase
Note: Hydrostatic transmission can be thought
of as a mechanical transformer
29
Why Are Pumps Inefficient at Low X?

Cs
Volumetric: Q xD 1
x
Mechanical: T xpD1 Cv
x
p p
1 x
Vr
xB
2

C f

p
x
Source:
30http://www.emeraldinsight.com/content_images/fig/0180560404021.png
Improving Pump Efficiency

Mechanical:
Variable Displacement Linkage
Low Friction Pin Joints
Volumetric:
Rolling Diaphragm Seal
No Leakage
Minimal Friction
31
Source: www.diacom.com
Source: Sandor, G.N. and Erdman, A.G.,

Advanced Mechanism Design: Analysis and
Synthesis, Volume 2, Prentice-Hall, 1984.
Linkage Synthesis
Video
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovVGkjuXdvE
32
Configuration Analysis
Stroke/Footprint
Overlapped Case at R1,max

2
1.5
1
0.5
0.24
0.22
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
0.2
Optimized Solution:
R3 = 1.8, R4 = 1.8
Max Displacement = 2.11
Footprint = 8.38
0.18
0.16
2.5
0.14
Minimum Transmission Angle of Slider = 56

Minimum Timing Ratio = .72
33
2.5
|R3| Unitless
1.5 1.5
|R4| Unitless
First Generation Prototype

Variable Pump/Motor
Design Speed: 1750 RPM
Design Flow Rate 2.6e-4
Design Max Pressure: 6.9 MPa (1000 psi)
34
35
36
Quantifying Energy Loss

Leakage:
Viscous Friction:
Compressibility:
Vdead
dP
( P)
PV
dP
PdV
( P)
dV
Pin Friction:
12
Ecomp
37
Energy Loss Model

Bronze Bushings
Rolling Element Bearings
System Energy Loss 1800 RPM 6.9 MPa
k = 0.173
System Energy Loss 1800 RPM 6.9MPa
18
16
Leakage
Viscous Friction
Coulomb Friction
Compressibility Losses
Total Losses
14
Energy Loss (J/rev)
Energy Loss (J/rev)
2.5
12
10
Leakage
Viscous Friction
Coulomb Friction
Compressibility Losses
Total Losses
8
6
4
1.5
0.5
2
0
k = .0015
3.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Displacement d/dmax
0.7
0.8
0.9
0
0
38
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Displacement d/dmax
0.7
0.8
0.9
Energy Loss Model

Efficiency Models at 1800 RPM and 6.9MPa
1
.0015
0.9
0.8
.173
0.7
Efficiency
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Bronze Bushings
Rollerbearings
McCandlish Model
0.1
0
0.1
39
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Displacement (D/Dmax )
0.8
0.9
Pumping Head Design

Outlet -8
Check Valve
Fittings
Inlet -12 (3/4 ID)
Leakage Port -6
40
Experimental Efficiency Testing

Optical encoder (not shown)
Torque Transducer
Accumulator to smooth
pulsating flow
Pressure Transducer
41
Flow Meter
Experimental Efficiency Testing

Results Validate the Model
42
2nd Generation Prototype
10kW power output

Three cylinder design
Linkage Balancing
Incorporate roller bearings into design
Multi-parameter re-optimization
Include both mechanical and fluid dynamics
simultaneously
43
Linkage Preliminary Design

Links in single shear
Rolling element bearings
used
Rotary input possibly
gear driven or drive shaft
can be used
Video
44
2 Minute Writing
Sheet of Paper
No Names
1. What do you like most about the way the
course is going?
2. What do you like least about the way the
course is going?
3. Suggestions for improvement?
45

ME 4232: Fluid Power Controls Lab: Class #6 Hydraulic Pumps

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ME 4232: Fluid Power Controls Lab: Class #6 Hydraulic Pumps

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ME 4232: Fluid Power Controls Lab: Class #6 Hydraulic Pumps

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ME 4232:

FLUID POWER CONTROLS LAB

Feedback: Lab Sections

Power Steering Valve (Lab 13)

Power beyond steering

Non-Positive Displacement Pump

Types of Positive Displacement Pumps

External Gear Pump

Internal/External Gear Pair

Pressure Compensated Vane Pump

Axial Piston Pump

Radial Piston Pump

Bent Axis Pump

Drive shaft coupled to cylinder block

Pumping Theory - Flow Ripple

Pumping Theory Power Variable Calculations

Pumping Theory Efficiency

Aeration and Cavitation

Bubbles expand in low pressure

Hydraulic Motor / Actuator

Closed Circuit Hydrostatic Trans

General Consideration - Hydrostats

Wide range of operating speeds/torque

Hydraulic Hybrid Vehicle Circuits

Hydro-Mech w/ Wheel Torque Control

High Efficiency & Decoupling

Independent Wheel Torque Control

Used to change pressure in a power

Why Are Pumps Inefficient at Low X?

Improving Pump Efficiency

Source: Sandor, G.N. and Erdman, A.G.,

Overlapped Case at R1,max

Max Displacement = 2.11

Minimum Transmission Angle of Slider = 56

First Generation Prototype

First Generation Prototype

First Generation Prototype

Quantifying Energy Loss

Energy Loss Model

Rolling Element Bearings

System Energy Loss 1800 RPM 6.9 MPa

System Energy Loss 1800 RPM 6.9MPa

Energy Loss (J/rev)

Energy Loss Model

Pumping Head Design

Inlet -12 (3/4 ID)

Experimental Efficiency Testing

Experimental Efficiency Testing

2nd Generation Prototype

10kW power output

Linkage Preliminary Design

You might also like