Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 67 views

    Chapter 18 - LTD

    Uploaded by

    marie deniega
    This document summarizes 12 key points from various Supreme Court cases related to the Subdivision and Condominium Protective Buyers' Decree. It establishes that the National Housing Authority has jurisdiction over certain cases. It outlines the specific functions of the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board in regulating subdivisions and resolving disputes. It also discusses issues like periods for appeal, when ordinary courts have jurisdiction over property ownership issues, and rights and responsibilities of buyers and sellers in subdivision developments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Chapter 18 - LTD

    Uploaded by

    marie deniega
    67 views2 pages
    This document summarizes 12 key points from various Supreme Court cases related to the Subdivision and Condominium Protective Buyers' Decree. It establishes that the National Housing Authority has jurisdiction over certain cases. It outlines the specific functions of the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board in regulating subdivisions and resolving disputes. It also discusses issues like periods for appeal, when ordinary courts have jurisdiction over property ownership issues, and rights and responsibilities of buyers and sellers in subdivision developments.

    Original Description:

    ltd

    Original Title

    Chapter 18 - Ltd

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes 12 key points from various Supreme Court cases related to the Subdivision and Condominium Protective Buyers' Decree. It establishes that the National Housing Authority has jurisdiction over certain cases. It outlines the specific functions of the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board in regulating subdivisions and resolving disputes. It also discusses issues like periods for appeal, when ordinary courts have jurisdiction over property ownership issues, and rights and responsibilities of buyers and sellers in subdivision developments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    67 views2 pages

    Chapter 18 - LTD

    Uploaded by

    marie deniega
    This document summarizes 12 key points from various Supreme Court cases related to the Subdivision and Condominium Protective Buyers' Decree. It establishes that the National Housing Authority has jurisdiction over certain cases. It outlines the specific functions of the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board in regulating subdivisions and resolving disputes. It also discusses issues like periods for appeal, when ordinary courts have jurisdiction over property ownership issues, and rights and responsibilities of buyers and sellers in subdivision developments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    CHAPTER 18 THE SUBDIVISION AND CONDOMINIUM PROTECTIVE BUYERS

    DECREE (P.D. no. 957 )


    1. Jurisdiction of NHA
    Tropical Homes Inc. vs. National Housing Authority (GR No. L-48672,
    July 31, 1987)
    2. Specific functions of HLURB
    Tejada vs. Homestead Property Corporation (GR No. 79622, Sept. 29,
    1989)
    AMA Computer College vs. Factora (GR No. 137911, Feb. 27, 2002)
    Arranza vs. B.F. Homes, Inc. (GR No. 131683, June 19, 2000)
    Alcasid vs. Court of Appeals (GR No. 94927, Jan. 22, 1993)
    Dulos Realty and Development Corporation vs. Court of Appeals (GR
    No. 128516, Nov. 28, 2001)
    Bank of the Philippine Islands vs. ALS Management and Development
    Corporation (GR No. 151821, April 14, 2004)
    HLC Construction and Development Corporation vs. EHSHA (GR No.
    139360, Sep. 23,2003)
    Realty Exchange Venture Corporation vs. Sendino (GR No. 109703, July
    5, 1994)
    Magat vs. Delizo (GR No. 135199, Nov. 17, 2004)
    Kakilla vs. Faraon (GR No. 143233, Oct. 18, 2004)
    Dela Cruz vs. Court of Appeals (GR No. 151298, Nov. 17, 2004)
    Estate Developers and Investors Corporation vs. Court of Appeals (GR
    No. 92461, Sep. 2, 1992)
    Francel Realty Corporation vs. Court of Appeals (GR No. 117051, Jan.
    22, 1996)
    3. Writ of Execution
    United Housing Corporation vs. Dayrit (GR No. 76422, Jan. 22, 1990)
    C.T. Torres Enterprises, Inc. vs. Hibionada (GR No. 80916, Nov. 9, 1990)
    4. Court has jurisdiction when issue involves ownership of property
    Multinational Village Homeowners Association, Inc. vs. Court of
    Appeals (GR No. 98023, Oct. 17, 1991)
    Dy vs. Court of Appeals (GR No. 87929, Dec. 17, 1991)
    5. Ordinary Courts do not have jurisdiction over collection of unpaid installments
    Sandoval vs Caneba (GR No. 90503, Sep. 27, 1990)
    6. Summary of cases or incidents where HLURB has jurisdiction
    Fajardo vs. Bautista (GR No. 102193, May 10, 1994)
    7. Townsite areas are not subject to coverage under the Comprehensive
    Agrarian Reform Law
    Natalia Realty, Inc. vs. Department of Agrarian Reform (GR No. 103302,
    August 12, 1993)
    8. Period to Appeal is 15 days
    SGMC Realty Corporation vs. Office of the President (GR No. 126999,
    Aug. 30, 2000)
    9. Mortgage without knowledge of the buyer is an unsound business practice

    Union Bank of the Philippines vs. Housing and Land Use Regulatory
    Board (GR No. 95364, June 29, 1992)
    Far East Bank & Trust Co. vs. Marquez (GR No. 147964, Jan. 20, 2004)
    Bank of the Philippine Islands vs. ALS Management and Development
    Corporation (GR No. 151821, April 14, 2004)
    10.Buyer need not give prior notice before desisting from further paying
    amortizations
    Casa Filipina Realty Corporation vs. Office of the President (GR No.
    76518, Feb. 7, 1995)
    11.Buyer may not be ousted for non-payment due to the failure of the
    subdivision owner to put up the required improvements
    Relucio vs. Brilliante Garfin (GR No. 76518, July 13, 1990)
    12.Prior purchasers cannot be disposed by a buyer of the foreclosed property
    Philippine National Bank vs. Office of the President (GR No. 10452, Jan.
    18, 1996)

    You might also like