Perioperatwe Care of The Mtient With Morbid Obesity
Perioperatwe Care of The Mtient With Morbid Obesity
Perioperatwe Care of The Mtient With Morbid Obesity
BEHAVIORAL OBJECTWES
80 1
AORN JOURNAL
A B S T R A C T
COMPARlSON OF MEDICAL
VERSUS SURGICAL TREATMENT
PAULA G R A L I N G , RN; H A Z E M E L A R I N Y , M D
802
AORN JOURNAL
Table 1
intervention, other than surgery, has provided any
meaningful long-term success. This includes dieting, exercise regimens, psychotherapy, or prescription medications. The consensus, therefore, is that
for a person who is morbidly obese, surgery is the
only known effective treatment6
Success rate. Almost all available surgical
interventions result in an approximately 70% excess
body weight loss during the first year. Rather than
facing a 95% failure rate for nonsurgical excess
body weight loss interventions, the patient can be
offered a range of surgical interventions that offer
greater than 90% long-term success when using
35% excess body weight loss as the cutoff for success. When using 50% excess body weight loss as
the cutoff, the success rate still is better than 70%,
even for purely restrictive procedures. With bypass
procedures and biliopancreatic diversion, success is
even greater.
Complications. The international registry of
bariatric surgeries provides data regarding surgical
mortality and complications. Statistics demonstrate
an overall surgical mortality of 0.17% for patients
undergoing bariatric surgery and a complication
rate of only 8.5%.8Considering patients preexisting
conditions and the risks these patients automatically bring with them to the OR, these statistics represent very low numbers, suggesting that surgical
intervention not only is safe but also much safer
than lack of intervention. Failure to intervene surgically for these patients undoubtedly results in promulgation of their comorbidities with eventual morbidity and early mortality.
For these reasons, people who are morbidly
obese are candidates for surgical intervention.
These surgical interventions have low morbidity
and mortality and provide a significant and sustained excess body weight loss with reduction of
comorbidity rates and improvement in both survival
and quality of life for the patient.
SURGICAL APPROACHES TO THE
TREATMENT OF MORBID OBESITY
CLASSIFICATION OF WEIGHT
BODY MASS INDEX (BMI)
BMI*
Cateaorv
< 18.5
Underweight
18.5 to 24.99
Normal
25 to 26.9
Overweight
27 to 30
Mild obesity
31 to35
Moderate obesity
36 to 40
Severe obesity
41 to45
Morbid obesity
> 50
Super obesity
803
AORN JOURNAL
Table 2
OBESlW-SPEClFK COMOABlDmES '
Cardiovascular
Atherosclerotic disease
Congestive heart failure
Hypertension
Varicose veins
Venous insufficiency and stasis
Dermatologic
Cellulitis
Dermatitis
Necrotizing infections
Panniculitis
Endocrinehetabolic
Diabetes mellitus
Glomerulosclerosis and renal failure
Gout
Hyperlipidernia
Malignancies
Breast cancer
Colorectal cancer
Endometrial cancer
Gallbladder cancer
Ovarian cancer
Pancreatic cancer
Prostate cancer
Uterine cancer
Musculoskeletal
Bane demineralization
Carpel tunnel syndrome
Low back pain
Osteoarthritis
Neuropsychiatric
Depression
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Stroke
~~
804
AORN JOURNAL
Table 3
absorbed. To target these sources, patients
excess caloric intake sources are categorized.
These excesses are classified as
bloating-vereating
or eating large meals;
choosing-hoosing
the wrong foods at each meal
(eg, high fat, fried, high carbohydrate, low fiber);
grazing4onstant snacking during the day and
between meals or at night; and
sweeting-frequent ingestion of high calorie simple sugar-containing foods, drinks, or shakes.
Patients are asked to classify themselves to
determine where their excess calories come from. If a
patient reports that currently he or she does not consume excess calories, then the patient is asked where
the excess calories came from in the past. Most
patients can classify themselves into one or two categories. Patients who report that they have had stable
weight for more than one year likely truly have modified their diets to reach balance. These patients are
classified as normal to low metabolizers, depending
on their reported caloric intake.
The best judge of a patients need is the patient.
The only limiting factor is the patients knowledge
base. When the patient determines the source of his or
her excess calories, the appropriate procedure can be
chosen. This process is accomplished cooperatively
with the patient and his or her health care providers,
who consider all factors contributing to the decision,
including the patients weight loss goals, short and
long-term risk tolerance, and side-effect tolerance.
Anastomosis
A newly established connection between two hollow
structures (ie, stomach to intestine, intestine to intestine,
intestine to colon, bile duct to intestine). This con be a
stapled, sewn, or mixed connection. Such connections
con be end to end, end to side, or side to end.
Band
~
Biliopancreatic limb
The segment of smoll bowel that starts at the second
portion of the duodenum where the bile duct enters the
duodenum and ends when and where it enters into the
Roux limb. This is the bile-carving limb.
Common channel
The segment of smoll bowel thot starts where the biliopancreatic limb enters into the Roux limb and ends at
the cecum. This is the segment where complex proteins,
fats, and carbohydrates ore best digested.
Pouch
The portion of the stomach that serves os o reservoir for
food immediately after food exits the esophagus.
Roux limb
The segment (ie, limb) of small bowel thot first receives
food, starting where food enters it and ending where the
biliopancreotic limb joins it.
pAnw SELECTION
The most important factor in achieving success
in bariatric surgery is patient selection and intervention selection. Most patients who present for evaluation for bariatric surgical procedures are selfreferred, determined to achieve change, and willing
to make personal lifelong sacrifices to achieve their
goals. Candidates who are not self-referred generally are reluctant, uncertain, and attached to certain
eating behaviors (eg, binge eating, specific food
addiction). These patients need to be counseled
extensively before undergoing surgery. Table 3 provides a glossary of terms common to many bariatric
surgical procedures.
Anatomical and historical considerations.
Figure 1 shows the normal anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract. The esophagus is the first passageway
into the stomach. Historically, interventions above
or at the level of the esophagus have not been effective for the treatment of morbid obesity. For exam-
Staple line
A row of staples fired into the bowel or stomach by a stopling device. A staple line can be within an anastomosis,
in a partition, or in o divided bowel end. One staple line
sometimes is incorporated into another or into o fully
hand-sewn anastomosis,
805
AORN JOURNAL
808
AORN JOURNAL
patients physical and psychological needs. Appropriately sized gowns and blood pressure cuffs, as
well as stretchers, must be readily available so that the
patient is made to feel welcome and not embarrassed
by the lack of attention to his or her size requirements. Additionally, specific education regarding
psychological needs of patients who are morbidly
obese is provided to preoperative personnel, including the registration clerk and holding area receptionist. Patients often view this day as the first day of the
rest of their lives. Unsolicited or inappropriate comments can spoil the experience for them, much the
same as spoiling a wedding day. Comments such as
you dont look like you need this surgery or oh,
but you really do carry your weight well may be
offered as compliments but can be perceived negatively by the patient. The patients family members
already may have accused the patient of taking the
easy way out by having surgery. Inappropriate comments may be reminiscent of past accusations of lack
of willpower or effort.
Preoperutivephuse. The patient usually is admitted to the hospital on the same day of surgery. He or
she is escorted directly from the registration area to the
preoperative holding area. In the preoperative holding
area, the preoperative nurse asks the patient to change
into a patient gown and wait on a stretcher for consult
with perioperative team members. The preoperative
nurse completes a patient assessment of vital signs,
reviews laboratory work for variations in normal values, and reviews the chart for completion of necessary
paperwork (eg, signed consent form, surgeons history
and physical examination).
The circulating nurse arrives from the OR to
greet the patient in the preoperative holding area. He
or she performs a brief assessment of factors affecting positioning, reviews the planned procedure, and
gives the patient and family members an opportunity
to ask questions. The circulating nurse then develops
a care plan specific to this patient and the procedure
being performed (Table 4). The patient remains in the
preoperative holding area until the anesthesia care
provider completes a preoperative assessment, places
an IV line, and administers a preoperative dose of
antibiotics. When the surgeon arrives and confirms
the planned procedure, the anesthesia care provider
notifies perioperative nursing team members and
transports the patient to the OR.
Intruoperutive phase. If at all possible, preoperative sedative medications are kept to a minimum
to facilitate patient transfer from the stretcher to the
809
AOKN JOURNAL
Table 4
NURSING CARE PIAN FOR A IP#TIEM UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR MORBID OBESITY
Nursing
diagnosis
Interventions
Interim
outcome criteria
Outcome
statement
Altered nutrition,
more than
body requirements related
to specific
eating patterns
The patient
verbalizes
understanding of
altered nutrition.
The patient
demonstrates
knowledge of
nutritional
requirements for
selected surgery.
The patient
verbalizes
decreased
anxiety and an
ability to cope,
understanding
of individualized
procedure and
sequence of
events,
that questions
have been
answered, and
expected
outcomes.
The patient
demonstrates
knowledge of
the expected
response to the
procedure and
discharge care.
The patient's
pulmonary function is consistent with or
improved from
baseline levels.
The patient
demonstrates
and reports adequate pain control throughout
the perioperative
period.
The patient
demonstrates
adequate pain
management.
Verifies patient's identity, allergies, NPO status, and informed The patient's skin
remains smooth
consent.
Assesses skin integrity, sensory impairments, and muscu- and intact, and
neuromuscular
loskeletal status.
functions are
Transfers patient while awake using appropriate number of maintained or
assistive personnel, implementing protective measures to improved from
prevent positioning injury, and maintaining correct body
baseline.
alignment.
Evaluates for signs and symptoms of injury.
810
AORN JOURNAL
The patient is
free from positioning injury
from extraneous
objects.
811
AORN JOURNAL
Features
(ie, 500
cm unstretched
total bowel
length)
Weight
loss
Malnutrition
Revision
Possible
late
complications
Esophagitis
Band erosion
Staple line failure
812
AORN JOURNAL
Features
Weight
loss
Malnutrition
5% to 7% malnutrition and
vitamin deficiency risk, especially vitamins A, 0,E, and
K and calcium
Revision
Possible
late
complications
Erosion
Slippage
Mega-esophagus
Variable
813
AORN JOURNAL
Figure 2
Figure 3
814
AORN JOURNAL
Figure 4
The surgeon performs an intraoperative endoscopy with pressure insufflation and leak test at the
end of the surgical procedure. The surgeon places a
drain before closure if the patient had an anastomosis,
which facilitates early diagnosis of an anastomotic
leak. At the completion of the procedure, the
PosToPERAmfE rnUoW-UP
The patient is instructed to be as active as possible, walking up to one mile per day by the postoperative office visit. He or she also is instructed to
wear an abdominal binder while active. Activity
gradually is increased; however, the patient is
instructed to avoid heavy lifting for three to six
weeks after surgery to allow the incisions to heal
solidly. The patient may return to work one week
after surgery if he or she underwent a laparoscopic
procedure. If the patient underwent an open procedure, he or she may be able to return to work approximately six weeks later.
817
AORN JOURNAL
Table 6
PO?STOPERATMORDERS FOR LAP#ROSCOPICGASTRIC BYPASS PROCEDURES'
Day of surgery
Medications:
o Check blood sugar every (9) 6
hrs, then administer subcutaneous (SQ) humulin regular
insulin using the sliding scale
Blood sugar
180-200
201 -250
25 1 -300
30 1-350
3 5 1-400
401 -450
5 units IV then
> 450
Dose
2 units SQ
4 units SQ
6 units SQ
8 units SQ
10 units SQ
10 units SQ and
Albuterol 0.5 mL in 3 mL NS q 4
hrs and add intermittent positivepressure breathing at 10 if poor
effort identified
Bilateral lower extremity sequential
compression devices (SCDs) over
thromboemboletic stockings
Vital signs per routine
recheck blood
sugar after 3 hrs
Same and call
physician
Cefotetan 2 g IV piggyback
(IVPB) q 12 hrs for three postoperative doses, if not allergic
o Famotidine 20 mg IVPB q 8 hrs
for three postoperative doses
o Patient-controlled analgesia per
anesthesia care providers; discontinue (D/C) on postoperative
day two and switch to fentanyl
patch 50 mcg/hr
o Enoxaparin 4 0 mg SQ two times
per day (bid) starting late tonight
o Pramethazine 25mg IV push
Diet
0 Call resident for diet when upper
gastrointestinal series results
have been received
o Advance diet to full liquids then
to low carbohydrate (ie, diabetic)
clear liquid diet; patient may
dilute juices 50/50
administer in sherbet
0 Ursodiol 300 mg taken by mouth
(PO) bid if patient has not had a
cholecystectomy
0 Fentanyl patch 2 5 mcg per hr
PRN for pain
0 Acetaminophen/oxycodone one
to two tablets q 4 to 6 hours
PRN for pain if fentanyl patch is
not adequate
0 lanoprasole 30 mg PO q day
0 Acetaminophen 1,000 mg liquid
PO q 4 hrs PRN for headache or
temperature > 101 F (38.3 C) if
tolerating oral intake
o D/C meperidine
O
NOTES
1 . H A Elariny, 'Postoperative instructions after open and laparoscopic gastric bypass," Advanced Laparoscopic and
General Surgery Associates, http://www.alagsa.com/GBP-lnstr.htm (accessed 30 Jan 2003).
818
AORN JOURNAL
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guide
lines/obesity/ob-home.htm(accessed
30 Jan 2003).
6.G S Cowan, Jr, A predicted
hture for bariatric surgery: Using the
surgical model, Obesity Surgery 6
(February 1996) 12-16;S AbuAbeid, A Keidar, A Szold, Resolution of chronic medical conditions
after laparoscopic adjustable silicone
gastric banding for the treatment of
morbid obesity in the elderly,
Surgical Endoscopy 15 (February
2001) 132-134;M Deitel, Surgery
for morbid obesity. Overview,
European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 1 1
(February 1999)57-61;A M Glenny
et al, The treatment and prevention
819
AORN JOURNAL