Maritime Security Model Course PDF

U.S.
Department of Transportation
Maritime Administration
Maritime Security for Vessel Personnel

with Specific Security Duties
Model Course MTSA 04-01
Prepared by
THE UNITED STATES MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY
December 2004
Contents
FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................... II
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ III
PART A: COURSE FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................... 1
PART B: COURSE OUTLINE ...................................................................................................... 6
PART C: DETAILED TEACHING SYLLABUS ................................................................................ 9
PART D: INSTRUCTOR MANUAL ............................................................................................. 14
PART E: EVALUATION ........................................................................................................... 28
Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties
Foreword
This course is one of a series developed by the U.S. Maritime Administration in fulfilment of its charge
under the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA 2002). Section 109 of the Act required
the Secretary of Transportation to develop standards and curricula to allow for the certification of
maritime security professionals. This responsibility was delegated by the Secretary to MARAD and
subsequently assigned by me to the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy for execution.
Through a collaborative effort with industry and other government agencies, the Academy created seven
model course frameworks in response to the training needs identified by the Congress and articulated in
the MTSA of 2002. These model course frameworks, and a discussion of key issues related to maritime
security education and training, are contained in MARADs Report to Congress titled Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002: Section 109 Implementation.
The MTSA project led to the creation by the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy, in a joint effort with the
United States Coast Guard and the Directorate General of Shipping, Government of India, of three model
courses for the International Maritime Organization. The Ship Security Officer, Company Security
Officer, and Port Facility Security Officer courses have been published by the IMO and are now the
global benchmark for maritime security training in their respective areas.
In a style similar to the IMO model courses, the course that follows is one of four based on the MARAD
Report to Congress that provide training guidance for security personnel not addressed by the IMO model
courses. In addition to informing and helping to standardize maritime security training, this course is one
that will be used as a reference in the interim system of course approval and certification that has been
jointly established by MARAD and the U.S. Coast Guard. Organizations that wish to submit maritime
security courses for approval under this system should use this course, the others in the MTSA series, and
the three IMO model courses as the standard reference for the development and operation of courses in
this domain.
It is my hope that this course and the others like it will serve to harmonize and standardize port, maritime,
and intermodal transportation security education and training, and that this will enhance the security of
our Nation.
Captain William G. Schubert
Maritime Administrator
ii
Introduction
This model course is intended as specific guidance upon which education and training providers can
immediately base instruction in maritime security matters. It is the result of a careful effort to ensure that
the requirements of relevant domestic legislation, international conventions, and other pertinent guidance
are addressed through standards of knowledge and the acquisition of specific understanding through
education and training. In addition, expert advice and public comment have been solicited and obtained
through a focused public outreach effort. Input thus received has helped to ensure that the model course
is fully consistent with applicable law enforcement, government, and industry standards.
This model course and others in the series of which it is a part constitute a base-level curriculum for
maritime security education and training that includes those subjects listed in MTSA Sec. 109 (b)(2). In
addition to delineating the duties and responsibilities of personnel in various categories and identifying
the subject areas that should be contained in education and training that are intended to be responsive to
these requirements, the curriculum suggests resources that can be employed in delivery of the material.
These resources include reports, regulations, conventions, books, videotapes, and other adjuncts to
education and training that will assist instructors in conducting the training envisioned in Sec. 109 (b)(2).
This course is also intended to serve as a comparison reference for courses that are submitted for approval
under the MARAD/USCG MTSA Section 109 course approval system. It should be noted in this
connection that U.S. domestic training courses for Vessel Security Officer, Company Security Officer,
and Facility Security Officer should use the IMO model courses for Ship Security Officer (Model Course
3.19), Company Security Officer (Model Course 3.20), and Port Facility Security Officer (Model Course
3.21), respectively, as standards for course content, schedule, and related matters.
iii
Part A: Course Framework

Scope
This model course is intended to provide the knowledge required for vessel personnel who are
assigned specific security duties in connection with a Vessel Security Plan (VSP) to perform their
duties in accordance with the requirements of the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002
and/or Chapter XI-2 of SOLAS 74 as amended and/or the IMO ISPS Code and/or U.S. Coast Guard
regulations contained in 33 CFR Chapter 1 Subchapter H.
Objective
Those who successfully complete the course should be able to demonstrate sufficient knowledge to
undertake the duties assigned under the VSP. This knowledge shall include, but is not limited to:
1.
knowledge of current security threats and patterns;
2.
recognition and detection of weapons, dangerous substances and devices;
3.
recognition, on a non-discriminatory basis, of characteristics and behavioral patterns of

persons who are likely to threaten security;
4.
techniques used to circumvent security measures;
5.
crowd management and control techniques;
6.
security related communications;
7.
knowledge of emergency procedures and contingency plans;
8.
operation of security equipment and systems;
9.
testing, calibration and at-sea maintenance of security equipment and systems;
10.
inspection, control, and monitoring techniques; and
11.
methods of physical searches of persons, personal effects, baggage, cargo, and vessel
stores.
Entry standards
It is assumed that those attending this course will be serving seafarers (or other vessel personnel)
and are likely to be assigned specific security duties in connection with the Vessel Security Plan.
Training providers must verify trainee identity and citizenship.
Course certificate, diploma or document

Following verification of identity and citizenship, documentary evidence should be issued to
those who have successfully completed this course indicating that the holder has completed training
in Maritime Security for Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties based on this model
course.
Course delivery
The outcome of this course may be achieved through various methods, including classroom
training, in-service training, distance learning, computer-based training or combinations of these
methods.
Course intake limitations

The maximum number of trainees should depend on the facilities and equipment available, bearing
in mind the aims and objectives of this course.
Staff requirements
The instructor in charge of the course shall have had training and/or acceptable equivalent practical
experience in the subject matter of this course, including knowledge of vessel, facility, and port
operations, maritime security matters, and the requirements of the Maritime Transportation Security
Act of 2002, Chapter XI-2 of SOLAS 74 as amended, the IMO ISPS Code, and relevant U.S. Coast
Guard regulations.
It is recommended that instructors should either have appropriate training in or be familiar with
instructional techniques and training methods.
Teaching facilities and equipment

An ordinary classroom or similar meeting room with a blackboard or equivalent is sufficient for the
lectures. In addition, when making use of audiovisual materials, it should be ensured that
appropriate equipment is available. Finally, the use of shipboard environments (vessels or mockups) for certain segments of the course may enhance the overall effectiveness of this training.
.
Teaching aids
Course Framework (Part A of the course)
Instructor Manual (Part D of the course)
Audiovisual aids: video cassette player, TV, slide projector, overhead projector, etc.

Photographs, models, or other representations of various vessels and vessel parts to illustrate
operational elements and security vulnerabilities.
Video cassette(s)
Distance learning package(s)
Bibliography
The American Waterways Operators. (2002, April). AWO Model Vessel Security Plan.
Arlington, VA: AWO.
Fernandez, L., & Merzer, M. (2003). Janes Crisis Communications Handbook, (1st ed.).
Alexandria: Janes Information Group.
Hawkes, K. G. (1989). Maritime Security. Centreville: Cornell Maritime Press.
International Chamber of Shipping. (2001, November). Guidance for Shipowners, Ship Operators
and Masters on the Protection of Ships from Terrorism and Sabotage. London: ICS.
Republic of Liberia. (2002, April). Proposed Security Manual for Ships and Mobile Offshore
Drilling Units. MSC/Inf. 27. London: International Maritime Organization.
Sidell, F. R., et al. (2002). Janes Chem-Bio Handbook. (2nd ed.). Alexandria: Janes Information
Group.
Sullivan, J. P., et al. (2002). Janes Unconventional Weapons Response Handbook. (1st ed.).
Alexandria: Janes Information Group.
Viollis, P., et al. (2002). Janes Workplace Security Handbook. (1st ed.). Alexandria: Janes
Information Group.
Instruments, legislation, and regulatory references

International Labour Organization. Seafarers Hours of Work and the Manning of Ships
Convention, 1996. (No. 180).
International Labour Organization. Seafarers Identity Documents Convention, 1958. (No. 108).
International Labour Organization. Seafarers Identity Documents Convention (Revised), 2003.
(No. 185).
International Maritime Organization. (2001). International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea
(SOLAS), 1974. London: IMO. (IMO-IC110E).
International Maritime Organization. (2003). International Ship & Port Facility Security (ISPS)
Code, 2003 and December 2002 Amendments to SOLAS. London: IMO. (IMO-I116E).
International Maritime Organization. (1993). Res.A.738(18)--Measures to prevent and suppress
piracy and armed robbery against ships.
International Maritime Organization. (1986). MSC/Circ.443--Measures to prevent unlawful acts

against passengers and crews on board ships.
Commandant, United States Coast Guard. (2002, April). Security for Passenger Vessels and
Passenger Terminals. Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular No. 4-02.
Commandant, United States Coast Guard. (2002, 21 October). Security Guidelines for Vessels.
Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular No. 10-02.
Commandant, United States Coast Guard. (2003, 13 January). Recommended Security
Guidelines for Facilities. Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular No. 11-02.
Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security. (2003, 22 October). 33 CFR (Navigation and
Navigable Waters), Chapter 1, Subchapter HMaritime Security, Parts 101, 103, 104, 105, 106.
United States Congress. (2002, 25 November). Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002
(P.L. 107-295).
Textbooks
None recommended at this time.
Part B: Course Outline

Subject Area
Hours
Introduction
1.0
1.1
Course overview
1.2
Competences to be achieved
1.3
Current security threats and patterns
1.4
Vessel and port operations and conditions
Maritime Security Policy
0.75
2.1
Relevant international conventions, codes, and recommendations
2.2
Relevant government legislation and regulations
2.3
Definitions
2.4
Handling sensitive security-related information and communications
Security Responsibilities
1.25
3.1
Contracting governments
3.2
Recognized Security Organizations
3.3
The company
3.4
The vessel
3.5
The port facility
3.6
Vessel Security Officer
3.7
Company Security Officer
3.8
Facility Security Officer
3.9
Vessel personnel with specific security duties
3.10
Facility personnel with specific security duties
3.11
Other personnel
Vessel Security Assessment

4.1
Assessment tools
4.2
On-scene security surveys
4.3
Security assessment documentation
1.0
Security Equipment
0.75
5.1
Security equipment and systems
5.2
Operational limitations of security equipment and systems
5.3
Testing, calibration and maintenance of security equipment and systems
Threat Identification, Recognition, and Response
1.25
6.1
Recognition and detection of weapons, dangerous substances and devices
6.2
Methods of physical searches and non-intrusive inspections
6.3
Execution and coordination of searches
6.4
Recognition, on a non-discriminatory basis, of persons posing potential security

risks
6.5
Techniques used to circumvent security measures
6.6
Crowd management and control techniques
Vessel Security Actions
0.75
7.1
Actions required by different security levels
7.2
Maintaining security of the vessel/port interface
7.3
Familiarity with the Declaration of Security
7.4
Execution of security procedures

0.75
Emergency Preparedness, Drills, and Exercises

8.1
Execution of contingency plans
8.2
Security drills and exercises
Security Administration
9.1
0.5
Documentation and records
Total:
8.0
Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Course Timetable
Day/Period
Day 1
2nd Period (2.0 hours)
1st Period (2.0 hours)

1
1.1
1.2
1.3
Introduction
Course overview
Current security threats and
patterns
1.4 Vessel and port operations and
conditions
2
2.1 Relevant international
conventions, codes, and
recommendations
2.2 Relevant government legislation
and regulations
2.3 Definitions
2.4 Handling sensitive securityrelated information and
communications
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
The company
The vessel
The port facility
Vessel personnel with specific
security duties
3.10 Facility personnel with specific
security duties
3.11 Other personnel
4
4.1
4.2
4.3

Assessment tools
Security assessment documentation
3rd Period (2.0 hours)
4th Period (2.0 hours)
5
Security Equipment
5.1 Security equipment and systems
5.2 Operational limitations of security
equipment and systems
5.3 Testing, calibration and
maintenance of security equipment
and systems
7 Vessel Security Actions

7.1 Actions required by different
security levels
7.2 Maintaining security of the
vessel/port interface
7.3 Familiarity with the Declaration of
Security
7.4 Execution of security procedures
6
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
3
3.1 Contracting governments
3.2 Recognized Security
Organizations
6.5
6.6
Threat Identification,
Recognition, and Response
Recognition and detection of
weapons, dangerous substances
and devices
Methods of physical searches and
non-intrusive inspections
Execution and coordination of
searches
Recognition, on a nondiscriminatory basis, of persons
posing potential security risks
Techniques used to circumvent
security measures
Crowd management and control
techniques
Emergency Preparedness, Drills,

and Exercises
8.1 Execution of contingency plans
8.2 Security drills and exercises
9
9.1 Documentation and records
Part C: Detailed Teaching Syllabus

The detailed teaching syllabus has been written in learning objective format in which the objective
describes what the trainee should be able to do to demonstrate that knowledge has been transferred. All
objectives are understood to be prefixed by the words, "The expected learning outcome is that the trainee
.............................
Learning Objectives
1.
Introduction (1.0 hour)

1.1. Course overview
.1 describes the topics and emphasis of the course
1.2. Competences to be achieved
.1 describes the competences that will be achieved through completion of the course
1.3. Current security threats and patterns
.1 summarizes threats to the maritime transportation industry, such as:
piracy and armed attacks
terrorism
contraband smuggling
stowaways and refugees
cargo theft
collateral damage
1.4. Vessel and port operations and conditions
.1 characterizes the intermodal nature of transportation and the interfaces between vessels and
other modes
2.
Maritime Security Policy (0.75 hour)

2.1. Familiarity with relevant international conventions, codes, and recommendations
.1 summarizes previous efforts of IMO toward maritime security, such as MSC/Circ.443,
SUA Act, etc.
.2 summarizes the rapidity with which IMO acted to enhance maritime security following
9/11
.3 summarizes the amendments to SOLAS Chapter XI and the contents of the ISPS Code
2.2. Familiarity with relevant government legislation and regulations
.1 summarizes the requirements of relevant national legislation and regulations.
2.3. Definitions
.1 defines
Vessel Security Plan

Port facility
Vessel-to-facility interface
Vessel-to-port interface
Vessel-to-vessel activity
Designated Authority
Recognized Security Organization
Declaration of Security
Security incident
Security Level
the three security levels
2.4. Handling sensitive security-related information and communications
.1 defines security-sensitive information and the importance of keeping it confidential
3.
Security Responsibilities (1.25 hours)

3.1. Contracting governments
.1 summarizes the responsibilities of contracting governments with respect to SOLAS Chapter
XI-2 and the ISPS Code
3.2. Recognized Security Organizations
.1 surveys the role of the Recognized Security Organization
3.3. The company
.1 summarizes the responsibilities of the company with respect to:
ensuring Master has documents on board relating to the crewing of the vessel and its
employment
ensuring that the Vessel Security Plan contains a clear statement emphasizing the masters
authority
designating a Company Security Officer and a Vessel Security officer and ensuring that
they are given the necessary support to fulfil their duties and responsibilities
3.4. The vessel
.1 states that the vessel shall comply with the requirements of the Vessel Security Plan as per
the security level set
3.5. The facility
.1 states that facilities shall comply with the relevant requirements of the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002 and/or Chapter XI-2 of SOLAS 74 as amended and/or
the IMO ISPS Code and/or U.S. Coast Guard regulations contained in 33 CFR Chapter 1
Subchapter H
.2 states that the facility shall act upon the security levels set by the Administration
3.6. Vessel Security Officer
.1 states that the company shall designate a Vessel Security Officer for each vessel
.2 lists the duties and responsibilities of the Vessel Security Officer
3.7. Company Security Officer
.1 states that the company shall designate a Company Security Officer
10

.2
describes that the person designated as Company Security Officer may act as Company
Security Officer for one or more vessels provided that it is clearly identified for which
vessels he is responsible
.3 indicates that the company may designate several persons as Company Security Officer
provided that it is clearly identified for which vessels each is responsible
.4 lists the duties and responsibilities of the Company Security Officer
3.8. Facility Security Officer
.1 states that the Facility Security Officer shall be designated for each facility
.2 states that a person may be designated as the Facility Security Officer for one or more
facilities
.3 lists the duties and responsibilities of the Facility Security Officer
3.9. Vessel personnel with specific security duties
.1 states that members of the vessels crew other than the VSO may be assigned security
duties in support of the Vessel Security Plan
3.10. Facility personnel with specific security duties
.1 states that facility personnel other than the FSO may be assigned security duties in support
of the Facility Security Plan
3.11. Other personnel
.1 states that other vessel and facility personnel may have a role in the enhancement of
maritime security
.2 states that personnel other than vessel or facility personnel may have a role in the
enhancement of maritime security
4.
Vessel Security Assessment (1.0 hour)

4.1. Assessment tools
.1 discusses the use of checklists in conducting security assessments
4.2. On-scene security surveys
.1 lists the preparations required prior to an on-scene survey
.2 lists the procedures and measures and operations to be evaluated during an on-scene survey
.3 discusses the security aspects of vessel layout
.4 divides the survey into the following sections:
Physical Security
Structural Integrity
Personnel Protection Systems
Procedural Policies
Radio and Telecommunication Systems
Other Areas
.5 discusses the importance and elements of physical security aboard vessels
.6 describes the significance of structural integrity for vessels and other structures
.7 discusses the components and operations of systems to protect vessel personnel
.8 states the role of proper procedures in preventing and mitigating security incidents
.9 describes the use of information technology and communications systems in vessel
operations and in maintaining security
11

.10 identifies other areas that may, if damaged or used for illicit observation, pose a risk to
persons, property, or operations aboard the vessel or within a port facility
.11 discusses the identification of vulnerabilities in the above areas and the preparation of
countermeasures to address them
.12 states the importance of having in place emergency plans to deal with contingencies
5.
Security Equipment (0.75 hour)

5.1. Security equipment and systems
.1 demonstrates familiarity with the various types of security equipment and systems that can
be used aboard vessels and in facilities
5.2. Operational limitations of security equipment and systems
.1 explains the limitations of individual items of equipment and security systems
5.3. Testing, calibration and maintenance of security equipment and systems
.1 describes the testing, calibration and maintenance requirements for the above security
equipment and systems
6.
Threat Identification, Recognition, and Response (1.25 hours)

6.1. Recognition and detection of weapons, dangerous substances and devices
.1 summarizes the various types of weapons, dangerous substances and devices, the damage
they can cause, and their appearance
6.2. Methods of physical searches and non-intrusive inspections
.1 demonstrates how to carry out physical searches and non-intrusive inspections.
6.3. Execution and coordination of searches
.1 summarizes how important it is to plan a search and practice carrying out searches as a
drill.
.2 summarizes how to plan a search using a system of check cards
.3 summarizes the equipment the search team should carry for conducting a search
.4 summarizes the procedures to be followed for an efficient search
.5 summarizes the various places of concealment on board a vessel
6.4. Recognition, on a non-discriminatory basis, of persons posing potential security risks
.1 describes the general characteristics and behavioural patterns of persons who are likely to
threaten security
.2 states how important it is to be observant to recognize such persons
6.5. Techniques used to circumvent security measures
.1 summarizes the techniques that may be used to circumvent security measures
6.6. Crowd management and control techniques
.1 summarizes the basic psychology of a crowd in a crisis situation
.2 summarizes the importance of clear communication with crew and passengers during an
emergency
7.
Vessel Security Actions (1.0 hour)

7.1. Actions required by different security levels
.1 states the three security levels and the actions required for each level.
12

7.2.

.1 lists the reporting requirements for vessels prior to entering port
7.3. Familiarity with the Declaration of Security
.1 explains the Declaration of Security and what it addresses.
7.4. Execution of security procedures
.1 states the requirements for the Vessel Security Officer to carry out regular security
inspections
.2 lists the security measures and procedures at the three security levels required to:
ensure the performance of all vessel security duties
control access to the vessel
control the embarkation of persons and their effects
monitor restricted areas to ensure only authorized persons have access
monitor deck areas and areas surrounding the vessel
coordinate the security aspects of the handling of cargo and vessel stores; and
ensure that security communication is readily available
8.
Emergency Preparedness, Drills, and Exercises (0.75 hour)

8.1. Execution of contingency plans
.1 discusses action to take in case of a breach of security
.2 discusses contingency plans for:
hijacking
bomb threat
unidentified objects / explosives on vessel
damage to / destruction of facility
piracy and other depredations
stowaways
8.2. Security drills and exercises
.1 states the requirements for conducting drills and exercises
9.
Security Administration (0.5 hour)

9.1. Documentation and records
.1 states the documents that shall be available on board at all times
.2 states the activities for which records shall be kept on board and the duration for which they
should be retained.
Total: 8.0 hours
13
Part D: Instructor Manual

The instructor manual provides guidance on the material that is to be presented during the course for
Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties. This manual reflects the views of the course developers
with respect to methodology and organization as well as what they consider relevant and important in
light of their experience as instructors. Although the guidance given should be of value initially, each
instructor should develop his or her own methods and ideas, recognize and refine what is successful, and
discard that which does not work satisfactorily.
The material has been arranged under the following nine main headings:
1
Introduction
Security Equipment
The course outline and timetable provide guidance on the time allocation for the course material, but the
instructor is free to modify this if it is deemed necessary. The detailed teaching syllabus must be studied
carefully and, where appropriate, lesson plans or lecture notes compiled.
Preparation and planning are the most important criteria in effectively presenting this course. Availability
and proper use of course materials are also essential for maximum efficacy in conveying the subject to
trainees. The capabilities and limitations of the facilities in use may dictate that the learning objectives be
adjusted but it is suggested that this be kept to a minimum.
Where possible, lectures should be supported by written course materials, videos, and other media that
allow the trainee to embrace the material more fully. It will be necessary to prepare material for use with
overhead projectors or for distribution to trainees as handouts.
14
Guidance Notes
1
Introduction
1.1
Course overview
The starting point should be a brief statement of the purpose of the course, a short review of the timeline,
an introduction of participants, determination of knowledge and experience levels, and a brief description
of the teaching facility.
1.2
The aim of the course is stated, competences from Part C of the course are reviewed, and the outcome of
the learning objectives is made clear; namely, that the expected learning outcome is that the trainee
.............................
Instructors should emphasize that no one is being trained to fight or similarly respond to security threats
but rather that trainees should be able to identify, deter, or mitigate such actions through proper planning,
preparation, and coordination with various entities.
1.3
Current security threats and patterns
Current threats to maritime security should be summarized in order to provide a basis for understanding
of the recent conventions and legislation in this area and to fully grasp the importance of the training
provided by this course. Prospective security personnel receiving this training must clearly sense the
reality of todays security issues, which include piracy, terrorism, contraband smuggling, cargo theft, and
collateral damage. Some may have adopted a mindset that places the problem of security in the past or in
such a remote corner that it appears distant or irrelevant. Before continuing on with the course this
mindset should be identified and addressed.
Piracy and armed attacks continue to occur on an all too frequent basis. Attacks occur mostly in port
areas, whereas piracy, by definition, usually involves ships at sea. In fact, the United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Sea, Article 101, defines piracy as any of the following acts: illegal acts of violence or
detention or any act of depredation committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private
vessel or private aircraft and directed on the high seas against another vessel or aircraft or against persons
or property on board such vessel or aircraft. It also includes such acts against a vessel, aircraft, person or
property in a place outside of the jurisdiction of any State.
Terrorism usually involves violence, or the threat of violence, by extremist groups seeking to gain
political objectives by malicious means. A terrorist group may hope to make a statement by using various
types of bombs, making bomb threats or hijacking a vessel. Increasingly, terrorists are acting in
connection with extremist religious sects that promote suicidal behavior.
Contraband smuggling, a criminal activity, may result in large financial loss to the vessel owner whose
vessel is being used by the smugglers. Often, drugs are the commodity being smuggled and they may be
brought on board in a number of creative ways such as in luggage, stores, on or in a persons body, or in
electronic equipment. Weapons are also a frequent item associated with smuggling. Like drugs, weapons,
too, find their way on board in various ways, such as in cargo containers.
Cargo theft, an age-old problem, continues to plague the maritime industry and causes financial losses in
staggering amounts. Prevention is normally the most effective method of dealing with this security threat.
16

Although there may not be violence or political issues involved in most cargo theft cases, this matter
remains high on the list of security threats and requires solutions discussed in this course. Instructors
should convey that cargo theft is only one of the various threats to the security of cargo. Other such
security threats should be discussed during this section of the course.
Collateral damage occurs when a nearby fire, explosion, or attack results in damage to a vessel or facility.
While the damage is sometimes unintended, the costs are nevertheless real. There are measures that may
minimize the consequences of this type of damage.
1.4
Vessel and port operations and conditions
This section of the course should provide trainees with an understanding of the larger context in which
maritime operations occur. Familiarity with the complex transportation and logistics framework of the
maritime system will enable students to effectively undertake their security responsibilities. It is essential
for students to have a basic understanding of the general patterns and mechanisms of cargo and passenger
movement through international and intermodal transportation chains. The operational interface between
maritime and other modes of transportation is a central component of this segment of the course.
Trainees should also be exposed to the fundamentals of cargo tracking and related information systems in
the context of security.
2.1
Relevant international conventions, codes, and recommendations
Trainees should appreciate the attempts by international bodies to minimize, stop, or otherwise control
threats to security in maritime transportation. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has adopted
a number of resolutions and conventions to this end. For example, Resolution A.545(13)--Measures To
Prevent Acts Of Piracy And Armed Robbery Against Ships was signed in 1983. In 1985 came IMO
Resolution A.584 (14)--Measures To Prevent Unlawful Acts Which Threaten Safety Of Ships And
Security Of Passengers (this was later reviewed in November of 2001 with IMO Resolution A.924(22)).
Then in 1986 the IMO approved MSC/Circ.443--Measures To Prevent Unlawful Acts Against Passengers
And Crew On Board Ships. In 1988, the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the
Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA) treaties aimed at ensuring that appropriate judicial action is taken
against persons committing unlawful acts against ships. Unlawful acts would include the seizure of
vessels by force, acts of violence against persons on board vessels, and placing devices on board a vessel
which are likely to destroy or damage it. The convention obliges contracting governments either to
extradite or prosecute alleged offenders. The SUA came into effect on March 1, 1992.
Following the tragic events of September 11, 2001 the twenty-second session of the IMO, in November
of 2001, unanimously agreed to incorporate security regulations. They approved the development of new
measures relating to the security of vessels and of port facilities for adoption by a Conference of
Contracting Governments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 in December
of 2002 (the Diplomatic Conference). This timetable of little more than a year represents a landmark
achievement for IMO. It provides a clear indication of the gravity of the situation as well as the intention
to protect world shipping against security incidents and threats.
The meeting of the Diplomatic Conference in December of 2002 resulted in amendments to SOLAS 74.
These amendments enter into force on July 1, 2004. A brief summary of these amendments should be
carried out with mention of changes to Chapter V but with emphasis on the changes to Chapter XI,
Regulations 3 and 5 and the new Chapter XI-2 Regulations 1-13 and the ISPS Code. Since portions of the
ISPS Code will be studied in more depth in later sections of the course, the summary here can be brief.
17
2.2
Relevant government legislation and regulations
The Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, the maritime security regulations contained in 33 CFR
Chapter 1 Subchapter H, and other pertinent legislation and guidance should be summarized for trainees.
2.3
Definitions
Trainees will need a working knowledge of several terms found in SOLAS Chapter XI-2 Regulation 1, in
the ISPS Code Part A section 2, and in 33 CFR Chapter 1 Subchapter H. These terms may well need
clarification from an experienced instructor in order for trainees to reach the necessary level of
understanding. For instance, it might require emphasis or other clarification by the instructor to establish
that the Vessel Security Officer is a person on board the vessel and in that sense it may be impossible for
a Company Security Officer to also act as the Vessel Security Officer.
2.4
Handling sensitive security-related information and communications
Trainees should understand that certain information and communications will be considered security
sensitive and that the level of sensitivity may change, as do levels of security 1, 2, and 3. Seemingly
benign conversations, therefore, may result in disastrous consequences. All personnel will need to
appreciate the risk of security leaks through communication by improper methods or to the wrong
persons.
This section is intended to give trainees a clear picture of the proportions of the maritime security system
conceived of by the IMO as implemented via the MTSA regulations and to show how the various entities
will work together to form an efficient and effective whole.
3.1
Contracting governments
Instructors should discuss the roles of contracting governments and their obligations in the international
scheme to enhance maritime security. A brief understanding of this subject will help trainees to
comprehend how and why the United States has acted and how they may experience port state control as
exercised by another government.
3.2
Recognized Security Organizations
The trainee should understand that an RSO may take on the security-related activities of a contracting
government.
3.3
The company
The company is defined in 33 CFR Subchapter H and by SOLAS Chapter XI-1. Companies are given
numerous obligations under SOLAS Chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code and/or 33 CFR Subchapter H,
ranging from requirements for Continuous Synopsis Records to the maintenance of the International Ship
Security Certificate. Trainees will benefit greatly from a clear understanding of the role of the company
and the support that they should expect from the company.
18
3.4
The vessel
The term vessel as used here means any and all vessels to which the provisions of 33 CFR Chapter 1
Subchapter H apply. Segments of Chapter XI and the ISPS Code pertain to some of these vessels and
discuss the persons, activities, plans, documentation and so forth that vessels subject to SOLAS will be
exposed to in a security context. All trainees will nevertheless need to understand the requirements
relating to the security of the vessel in its role as the cornerstone of the marine transportation system.
3.5
The facility
The facility is defined in Chapter XI-2 of SOLAS 74 as amended, the ISPS Code, and/or the U.S. Coast
Guard regulations contained in 33 CFR Chapter 1 Subchapter H. It is the location where the
vessel/facility interface takes place. As such, numerous duties and responsibilities are assigned to the
facility. All trainees should understand the role of the facility in maintaining the security of the maritime
transportation system.
3.6- 3.11 Vessel Security Officer, Company Security Officer, Facility Security Officer, Vessel
Personnel with Specific Security Duties, Facility Personnel with Specific Security Duties, and Other
Personnel
Trainees should understand the role of each of these various persons and know what to expect from each
in terms of authority and responsibility. 33 CFR Chapter 1 Subchapter H and/or Parts A and B of the
ISPS Code clearly delineate the functions, duties, and training requirements for each of these categories
of personnel. In the end these are the very people that will make security plans work and who are best
positioned to recognize areas for improvement. They will each need to appreciate their own role as well
as that played by the others.
4.1
Assessment tools
Trainees must be encouraged to adopt systematic and consistent approaches to the evaluation of security
conditions and vulnerabilities. Vessel personnel with specific security duties may be called upon to assist
in these evaluations. The use of checklists to perform assessments of security in day-to-day operations
should therefore be discussed, noting the inclusion of categories such as the following:
General layout of the vessel.
Location of areas that should have restricted access, such as the bridge, engine room, radio room,
etc.
Location and function of each actual or potential access point to the vessel.
Open deck arrangement including the height of the deck above water.
Emergency and stand-by equipment available to maintain essential services.
Numerical strength, reliability, and security duties of the vessels crew.
Existing security and safety equipment for protecting the passengers and crew.
Existing agreements with private security companies for providing vessel and waterside security
services.
19

Existing protective measures and procedures in practice, including inspection, control and
monitoring equipment, personnel identification documents and communication, alarm, lighting,
access control and other appropriate systems.
4.2
Trainees should be taught that the on-scene security survey is an integral part of any Vessel Security
Assessment. They should understand that the survey should fulfil the following functions:
identification of existing security measures, procedures and operations;
identification and evaluation of key vessel operations that it is important to protect;
identification of possible threats to the key vessel operations and the likelihood of their
occurrence, in order to establish and prioritize security measures; and
identification of weaknesses, including human factors in the infrastructure, policies and
procedures.
It should be emphasized to course participants that the on-scene survey should examine and evaluate
existing vessel protective measures, procedures and operations for:
ensuring the performance of all security duties;
controlling access to the vessel, through the use of identification systems or otherwise;
controlling the embarkation of vessel personnel and other persons and their effects, including
personal effects and baggage whether accompanied or unaccompanied;
supervising the handling of cargo and the delivery of vessel stores;
monitoring restricted areas to ensure that only authorized persons have access;
monitoring deck areas and areas surrounding the vessel; and
ensuring the ready availability of security communications, information, and equipment.
Security Equipment
5.1
Security equipment and systems
Course participants should be familiar with the types of security equipment and systems that are useful in
enhancing maritime security, both ashore and afloat. Examples of such equipment include:
AIS
Vessel Security Alert System
Locks
Lighting
Handheld radios
GMDSS equipment
Closed Circuit Televisions
Automatic Intrusion Detection Device (Burglar Alarm)
Metal detectors
20

Explosive detectors
Baggage screening equipment
Container X-ray devices
General alarm
Participants are not expected to acquire detailed technical or scientific knowledge concerning the
theoretical underpinnings of the operation of security equipment. The objective is to ensure familiarity
with the capabilities of such devices and systems. Instructors should stress the need for familiarization
training involving the specific security equipment aboard each vessel.
5.2
Operational limitations of security equipment and systems
The intent of this course segment is to communicate to trainees the functional limitations and operating
constraints of security equipment that they may encounter or be called upon to use. Issues such as
effective range, environmental sensitivities, and operator (human) error should be addressed as
appropriate.
5.3
Testing, calibration and maintenance of security equipment and systems
Trainees should be familiar with methods for ensuring the continuing accuracy, efficiency, and
operational readiness of selected items of security equipment and associated systems.
6.1
Recognition and detection of weapons, dangerous substances and devices
The focus of this segment of the course is on the characteristics and potential effects of prohibited
weapons; explosives; chemical, biological, and radiological devices; substances and compounds that pose
a hazard to personnel, vessels, and facilities, and other related topics.
6.2
Methods of physical searches and non-intrusive inspections
In this segment of the course, trainees will learn techniques used to conduct physical and non-intrusive
searches of persons, personal effects, baggage, cargo, and vessel stores. Trainees should be informed
that, unless there are clear security grounds for doing so; members of the vessels crew should not be
required to search their colleagues or their personal effects. It should be conveyed that any such search
shall be undertaken in a manner that fully takes into account the human rights of the individual and
preserves his or her basic human dignity.
6.3
Execution and coordination of searches
Trainees should be acquainted with the utility of check cards in conducting systematic searches. A
check card is a card that can be issued to each searcher specifying the route to follow and the areas to
be searched. These cards can be colour-coded for different areas of responsibility, for example blue for
deck, red for engine room. On completion of individual search tasks, the cards are returned to a central
21

control point. When all cards are returned, the search is known to be complete. The findings of the search
can then be discussed.
Course participants should be familiar with the list of basic equipment that may be employed in
conducting searches. This list may include:
flashlights and batteries;
screwdrivers, wrenches and crowbars;
mirrors and probes;
gloves, hard hats, overalls and non-slip footwear;
plastic bags and envelopes for collection of evidence;
forms on which to record activities and discoveries.
Trainees should learn procedures to be followed so as to ensure effective and efficient searches.
Examples of these include the following:
Crew members should not be allowed to search their own areas in recognition of the possibility
that they may have concealed packages or devices in their own work or personal areas
The search should be conducted according to a specific plan or schedule and must be carefully
controlled.
Special consideration should be given to search parties working in pairs with one searching
high and one searching low. If a suspicious object is found, one of the pair can remain on
guard while the other reports the find.
Searchers should be able to recognize suspicious items.
There should be a system for marking or recording clean areas
Searchers should maintain contact with the search controllers, perhaps by UHF / VHF radio,
bearing in mind the dangers of using radio equipment in the vicinity of Improvised Explosive
Devices (IEDs).
Searchers should have clear guidance on what to do if a suspect package, device, or situation is
found.
Searchers should bear in mind that weapons and other dangerous devices may be intentionally
placed to match its context as a means of disguise, such as a toolbox in an engine room.
Participants in the course should be acquainted with the fact that there are many places on board a vessel
where weapons, dangerous substances, and devices can be concealed. Some of these are:
Cabins
Back sides and underneath drawers
Between bottom drawer and deck
Beneath bunks, e.g. taped to bunk frame under mattress
Under wash basin
Behind removable medicine chest
Inside radios, recorders etc.
Ventilator ducts
22

Inside heater units
Above or behind light fixtures
Above ceiling and wall panels
Cutouts behind bulkheads, pictures, etc.
False bottom clothes closets-hanging clothes
Inside wooden clothes hangers
Inside rolled socks, spare socks
Hollowed-out molding
Companionways
Ducts
Wire harnesses
Railings
Fire extinguishers
Fire hoses and compartments
Access panels in floors, walls, ceilings
Behind or inside water coolers, igloos
Toilet and Showers
Behind and under sinks
Behind toilets
In ventilation ducts and heaters
Toilet tissue rollers, towel dispensers, supply lockers
Taped to shower curtains, exposed piping, and light fixtures
Access panels in floors, walls, ceiling
Deck
Ledges on deck housing, electrical switch rooms, winch control panels
Lifeboat storage compartments, under coiled lines, in deck storage rooms
Paint cans, cargo holds, battery rooms, chain lockers.
Engine room
Under deck plates
Cofferdams, machinery pedestals, bilges
Journal-bearing shrouds and sumps on propeller shaft
Under catwalk, in bilges, in shaft alley
Escape ladders and ascending area.
23

In ventilation ducts, attached to piping or in tanks with false gauges.
Equipment boxes, emergency steering rooms, storage spaces.
Galleys and Stewards Stores
Flour bins and dry stores
Vegetable sacks, canned foods (re-glued labels)
Under or behind standard refrigerators
Inside fish or sides of beef in freezers
Bonded store lockers, slop chest, storage rooms.
6.4
Recognition, on a non-discriminatory basis, of persons posing potential security risks
Instructors should explain suspicious patterns of behavior, while emphasizing the importance of avoiding
racial profiling and ethnic stereotyping. Examples of suspicious behaviours include:
Unknown persons photographing vessels or facilities.
Unknown persons attempting to gain access to vessels or facilities.
Individuals establishing businesses or roadside food stands either adjacent or in proximity to
facilities.
Unknown persons loitering in the vicinity of vessels or port facilities for extended periods of
time.
Vehicles with personnel in them loitering and perhaps taking photographs or creating diagrams of
vessels or facilities.
Small boats with personnel on board loitering and perhaps taking photographs or creating
diagrams of vessels or facilities.
General aviation aircraft operating in proximity to vessels or facilities.
Persons who may be carrying bombs or participating in suicide squad activities.
Unknown persons attempting to gain information about vessels or facilities by walking up to
personnel or their families and engaging them in a conversation.
Vendors attempting to sell merchandise.
Workmen trying to gain access to vessels to repair, replace, service, or install equipment.
E-mails attempting to obtain information regarding vessels, personnel, or standard operating
procedures.
Package drop-offs/attempted drop-offs.
Anti-national sentiments being expressed by employees or vendors.
Anti-national pamphlets or flyers distributed to employees or placed on windshields in parking
lots.
Out-of-the-ordinary phone calls.
Recreational boaters or persons aboard refugee craft posing as mariners in distress to attract
assistance from other vessels.
24
6.5
Techniques used to circumvent security measures
Trainees should be cautioned that no security equipment or measure is infallible. They should be
apprised of the known techniques that can be employed to evade security systems and controls, such as
the disabling of alarm systems, picking of locks, jamming of radio signals, etc.
6.6
Crowd management and control techniques
Course participants should be familiarized with the basic patterns of behavior of people in groups during
time of crisis. The critical importance of clear communication with vessel personnel, facility personnel,
passengers, and others involved should be underscored.
33 CFR Chapter 1 Subchapter H and Parts A and B of the ISPS Code will be helpful in organizing
material to be conveyed in this section of the course. Instructors should indicate that this section of the
course is where ideas, plans, and preparation turn into actions and procedures.
7.1
Actions required by different security levels
The instructor should convey the different types of security measures that should be considered for
vessels at sea and those in port as they respond to security incidents and the various security levels that
may be set. Trainees may benefit from the in-class creation of checklists detailing the appropriate generic
actions given various conditions. The importance of familiarization training involving the Vessel
Security Plan particular to each vessel should be emphasized.
7.2
The vessel/port interface determines the need for a Facility Security Plan and the interaction with the
Vessel Security Plan. Instructors should ensure that trainees are clear on the critical importance of the
interaction between the vessel security plan and that of the facility.
7.3
Familiarity with the Declaration of Security
The Declaration of Security is defined in Regulation 1 of SOLAS Chapter XI-1 and in 33 CFR Chapter 1
Subchapter H. There is a sample Declaration of Security in Appendix 1 of Part B of the ISPS Code,
which may be helpful in explaining the nature and use of the Declaration of Security.
7.4
Execution of security procedures
Building on the understanding gained from previous sections in this course, trainees should be ready to
synthesize the requirements and plans into actual procedures such as security inspections, controlling
access to the vessel, verifying and controlling the use of identification credentials, monitoring deck areas
and areas surrounding the vessel, and so forth.
25
8.1
Execution of contingency plans
This portion of the course is concerned with the implementation of plans for a variety of contingencies
associated with terrorism and other criminal activities that may arise in the maritime setting. Possible
responses in the case of bomb threats, explosions, piracy, hijackings, and similar events should be
discussed.
8.2
Security drills and exercises
It should be conveyed to course participants that the objective of drills and exercises is to ensure that
vessel personnel are proficient in all assigned security duties at all security levels and in the identification
of any security-related deficiencies that need to be addressed.
Trainees should learn that effective implementation of the provisions of the Vessel Security Plan requires
that drills be conducted at least once every three months. In addition, in cases where more than 25 percent
of the vessels personnel have been changed, at any one time, with personnel that have not previously
participated in any drill on that vessel within the last 3 months, a drill should be conducted within one
week of the change. These drills should test individual elements of the plan such as:
damage to, or destruction of, the vessel or of a port facility, e.g. by explosive devices, arson,
sabotage or vandalism;
hijacking or seizure of the vessel or of persons on board;
tampering with cargo, essential vessel equipment, systems, or vessel stores;
unauthorized access or use, including presence of stowaways;
smuggling weapons or equipment, including weapons of mass destruction;
use of the vessel to carry persons intending to cause a security incident, or their equipment;
use of the vessel itself as a weapon or as a means to cause damage or destruction;
attacks from seaward while at berth or at anchor; and
attacks while at sea.
Various types of exercises involving participation of vessel security personnel should be carried out at
least once each calendar year with no more than 18 months between the exercises. These exercises should
test communications, coordination, resource availability, and response. These exercises may be:
full scale or live;
tabletop simulation or seminar; or
combined with other exercises held such as search and rescue or emergency response exercises.
9.1
Documentation and records
Drawing on 33 CFR Chapter 1 Subchapter H and SOLAS Chapter XI-1 Regulation 5 and Chapter XI-2,
the instructor will find references to, and examples of, required documents as well as requirements for
record keeping. Record-keeping requirements associated with the Vessel Security Plan should be
summarized.
26
27
Part E: Evaluation
Introduction
The effectiveness of any evaluation depends on the accuracy of the description of what is to be measured.
The learning objectives that are used in the detailed teaching syllabus will provide a sound base for the
construction of suitable tests for evaluating trainee progress.
Method of evaluation
The methods chosen to carry out an evaluation will depend upon what the trainee is expected to achieve
in terms of knowing, comprehending and applying the course content.
The methods used can range from a simple question-and-answer discussion with the trainees (either
individually or as a group) to prepared tests requiring the selection of correct or best responses from given
alternatives, the correct matching of given items, the supply of short answers or the supply of more
extensive written responses to prepared questions.
Where the course content is aimed at the acquisition of practical skills, the test would involve a practical
demonstration by the trainee making use of appropriate equipment, tools, etc.
The responses demanded may therefore consist of:
the recall of facts or information, by viva-voce or objective tests

the practical demonstration of an attained skill
the oral or written description of procedures or activities
the identification and use of data from sketches, drawings, maps, charts, etc.
carrying out calculations to solve numerical problems
the writing of an essay or report.
Validity
The evaluation must be based on clearly defined objectives, and it must truly represent what is to be
measured. There must be a reasonable balance between the subject topics involved and also in the testing
of trainees KNOWLEDGE, COMPREHENSION and APPLICATION of concepts.
The time allocated for the trainee to provide a response is very important. Each question or task must be
properly tested and validated before it is used to ensure that the test will provide a fair and valid
evaluation.
Reliability
To be reliable, an evaluation procedure should produce reasonably consistent results no matter which set
of papers or version of the test is used.
Subjective testing
28

Traditional methods of evaluation require the trainee to demonstrate what has been learned by stating or
writing formal answers to questions.
Such evaluation is subjective in that it invariably depends upon the judgement of the evaluator. Different
evaluators can produce quite different scores when marking the same paper or evaluating oral answers.
Objective testing
A variety of objective tests have been developed over the years. Their common feature is that the
evaluation does not require a judgement by the evaluator. The response is either right or wrong.
One type of objective test involves supplying an answer, generally a single word, to complete the missing
portion of a sentence. Another involves supplying a short answer of two or three words to a question.
Such tests are known as completion tests and short answer tests.
Another form of objective testing consists of selective response tests in which the correct, or best,
response must be selected from given alternatives. Such tests may consist of matching tests, in which
items contained in two separate lists must be matched, or they may be of the true/false type or of the
multiple-choice type.
The most flexible form of objective test is the multiple-choice test, which presents the trainee with a
problem and a list of alternative solutions, from which he must select the most appropriate.
Distracters
The incorrect alternatives in multiple-choice questions are called distracters, because their purpose is to
distract the uninformed trainee from the correct response. The distracter must be realistic and should be
based on misconceptions commonly held, or on mistakes commonly made.
The options none of the above or all of the above are used in some tests. These can be helpful, but
should be used sparingly.
Distracters should distract the uninformed, but they should not take the form of trick questions that
could mislead the knowledgeable trainee (for example, do not insert not into a correct response to make
it a distracter).
Guess factor
The guess factor with four alternative responses in a multiple-choice test would be 25%. The pass mark
chosen for all selective-response questions should take this into account.
29
Scoring
In simple scoring of objective tests one mark may be allotted to each correct response and zero for a
wrong or nil response.
A more sophisticated scoring technique entails awarding one mark for a correct response, zero for a nil
response and minus one for an incorrect response. Where a multiple-choice test involves four alternatives,
this means that a totally uninformed guess involves a 25% chance of gaining one mark and a 75% chance
of losing one mark.
Scores can be weighted to reflect the relative importance of questions, or of sections of an evaluation.
30

Maritime Security Model Course PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maritime Security Model Course PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maritime Security Model Course PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

U.S.

Maritime Security for Vessel Personnel

THE UNITED STATES MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY

Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Captain William G. Schubert

Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Part A: Course Framework

knowledge of current security threats and patterns;

recognition and detection of weapons, dangerous substances and devices;

recognition, on a non-discriminatory basis, of characteristics and behavioral patterns of

techniques used to circumvent security measures;

crowd management and control techniques;

security related communications;

knowledge of emergency procedures and contingency plans;

operation of security equipment and systems;

testing, calibration and at-sea maintenance of security equipment and systems;

inspection, control, and monitoring techniques; and

Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Course certificate, diploma or document

Course intake limitations

Teaching facilities and equipment

Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Instruments, legislation, and regulatory references

International Maritime Organization. (1986). MSC/Circ.443--Measures to prevent unlawful acts

Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Part B: Course Outline

Current security threats and patterns

Vessel and port operations and conditions

Maritime Security Policy

Relevant international conventions, codes, and recommendations

Relevant government legislation and regulations

Handling sensitive security-related information and communications

Recognized Security Organizations

The port facility

Vessel Security Officer

Company Security Officer

Facility Security Officer

Vessel personnel with specific security duties

Facility personnel with specific security duties

Vessel Security Assessment

On-scene security surveys

Security assessment documentation

Model Course: Vessel Personnel with Specific Security Duties

Security equipment and systems

Operational limitations of security equipment and systems

Testing, calibration and maintenance of security equipment and systems

Threat Identification, Recognition, and Response

Recognition and detection of weapons, dangerous substances and devices

Methods of physical searches and non-intrusive inspections

Execution and coordination of searches

Recognition, on a non-discriminatory basis, of persons posing potential security

Techniques used to circumvent security measures

Crowd management and control techniques

Vessel Security Actions

Actions required by different security levels

Maintaining security of the vessel/port interface

Familiarity with the Declaration of Security