Taxation Law Bar Questions 06-14

Ta x a t i o n L a w B a r Q u e s t i o n s - P a g e | 1
Taxation law Bar Questions
exempts charitable institutions and religious institutions from what kind of taxes?
Choose the best answer. Explain. 5%
2006
a. from all kinds of taxes, i.e., income, VAT, customs duties, local taxes and
real property tax
TAXATION LAW
b. from income tax only
-I-
c. from value-added tax only
1. Enumerate the 3 stages or aspects of taxation. Explain each. 5%
d. from real property tax only
2. Distinguish "direct taxes" from "Indirect taxes". Give examples. 5%

- II What is tax pyramiding? What is its basis in law? 5%
- III What properties are exempt from the real property tax? 5%
- IV Royal Mining is a VAT -registered domestic mining entity. One of its products is silver
being sold to the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. It filed a claim with the BIR for tax refund
on the ground that under Section 106 of the Tax Code, sales of precious metals to
the Bangko Sentral are considered export sales subject to zero-rated VAT.
Is Royal Mining's claim meritorious? Explain. 5%
-VVanishing deduction is availed of by taxpayers to:
e. from capital gains tax only

- VI Congress enacts a law granting grade school and high school students a 10% discount on
all school-prescribed textbooks purchased from any bookstore. The law allows bookstores
to claim in full the discount as a tax credit.
1. If in a taxable year a bookstore has no tax due on which to apply the tax credits,
can the bookstore claim from the BIR a tax refund in lieu of tax credit? Explain.
2.5%
2. Can the BIR require the bookstores to deduct the amount of the discount from
their gross income? Explain. 2.5%
3. If a bookstore closes its business due to losses without being able to recoup the
discount, can it claim reimbursement of the discount from the government on the
ground that without such reimbursement, the law constitutes taking of private
property for public use without just compensation? Explain. 5%
a. correct his accounting records to reflect the actual deductions mad
- VII -
b. reduce his gross income
Congress enacts a law imposing a 5% tax on the gross receipts of common carriers. The
law does not define the term "gross receipts". Express Transport, Inc., a bus company
plying the Manila- Baguio route, has time deposits with ABC Bank. In 2005, Express
Transport earned P1 Million interest, after deducting the 20% final withholding tax from
its time deposits with the bank. The BIR wants to collect a 5% gross receipts tax on the
interest income of Express Transport without deducting the 20% final withholding tax. Is
the BIR correct? Explain. 5%
c. reduce his output value-added tax liability

d. reduce his gross estate
Choose the correct answer. Explain. 5%
1. The Constitution provides "charitable institutions, churches, parsonages or
convents appurtenant thereto, mosques, and non- profit cemeteries and all lands,
buildings, and improvements actually, directly and exclusively used for religious,
charitable or educational purposes shall be exempt from taxation." This provision
- VIII On June 1, 2003, Global Bank received a final notice of assessment from the BIR for
deficiency documentary stamp tax in the amount of P5 Million. On June 30, 2003, Global
Bank filed a request for reconsideration with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The
Commissioner denied the request for reconsideration only on May 30, 2006, at the same
time serving on Global Bank a warrant of distraint to collect the deficiency tax. If you
were its counsel, what will be your advice to the bank? Explain. 5%
- IX The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued an assessment for deficiency income tax
for taxable year 2000 last July 31, 2006 in the amount of P10 Million inclusive of
surcharge and interests. If the delinquent taxpayer is your client, what steps will you take?
What is your defense? 10%
-XThe Collector of Customs issued an assessment for unpaid customs duties and taxes on the
importation of your client in the amount of P980,000.00. Where will you file your case to
protect your client's right? Choose the correct courts/agencies, observing their proper
hierarchy. 5%
1. Court of Tax Appeals
2. Collector of Customs
3. Commissioner of Customs
4. Regional Trial Court
5. Metropolitan Trial Court
6. Court of Appeals
7. Supreme Court
- XI Charlie, a widower, has two sons by his previous marriage. Charlie lives with Jane who is
legally married to Mario. They have a child named Jill. The children are all minors and
not gainfully employed.
of the Commission.er of Internal Revenue, filed with the Regional Trial Court an action
questioning the validity of the RMO.
If you were the judge, will you dismiss the case? 5%
- XIII Gerry was being prosecuted by the BIR for failure to pay his income tax liability for
Calendar Year 1999 despite several demands by the BIR in 2002. The Information was
filed with the RTC only last June 2006. Gerry filed a motion to quash the Information on
the ground of prescription, the Information having beer. filed beyond the 5-year
reglementary period.
If you were the judge, will you dismiss the Information? Why? 5%
- XIV Gold and Silver Corporation gave extra 14th month bonus to all its officials and
employees in the total amount of P75 Million. When it filed its corporate income tax
return the following year, the corporation declared a net operating loss. When the income
tax return of the corporation was reviewed by the BIR the following year, it disallowed as
item of deduction the P75 Million bonus the corporation gave its officials and employees
on the ground of unreasonableness. The corporation claimed that the bonus is an ordinary
and necessary expense that should be allowed.
If you were the BIR Commissioner, how will you resolve the issue? 5%
- XV Lily's Fashion, Inc. is a garment manufacturer located and registered as a Subic Bay
Freeport Enterprise under Republic Act No. 7227 and a non-VAT taxpayer. As such, it is
exempt from payment of all local and national internal revenue taxes. During its
operations, it purchased various supplies and materials necessary in the conduct of its
manufacturing business. The suppliers of these goods shifted to Lily's Fashion, Inc. the
10% VAT on the purchased items amounting to PS00,000.00. Lily's Fashion, Inc. filed
with the BIR a claim for refund for 'the input tax shifted to it by the suppliers.
1. How much personal exemption can Charlie claim? Explain. 2.5%
If you were the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, will you allow the refund? 5%
2. How much additional exemption can Charlie claim? Explain. 2.5%
- XVI -
- XII Mr. Abraham Eugenio, a pawnshop operator, after having been required by the Revenue
District Officer to pay value added tax pursuant to a Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO)
Quezon City published on January 30, 2006 a list of delinquent real property taxpayers in
2 newspapers of general circulation and posted this in the main lobby of the City Hall. The
notice requires all owners of real properties in the list to pay the real property tax due
within 30 days from the date of publication, otherwise the properties listed shall be sold at
public auction.
Joachin is one of those named in the list. He purchased a real property in 1996 but failed
to register the document of sale with the Register of Deeds and secure a new real property
tax declaration in his name. He alleged that the auction sale of his property is void for lack
of due process considering that the City Treasurer did not send him personal notice. For
his part, the City Treasurer maintains that the publication and posting of notice are
sufficient compliance with the requirements of the law.
1. If you were the judge, how will you resolve this issue? 2.5%
2. Assuming Joachin is a registered owner, will your answer be the same? 2.5%
NOTHING FOLLOWS.
2007
TAXATION LAW
I.
(5%)
What kind of taxes, fees and charges are considered as National Internal Revenue Taxes
under the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC)?
IV.
(10%)
XYZ Corporation, an export oriented company, was able to secure a Bureau of Internal
Revenue (BIR) ruling in June 2005 that exempts from tax the importation some of its raw
materials. The ruling is of first impression, which means the interpretations made by the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue is one without established precedents. Subsequently,
however, the BIR issued another ruling which in effect would subject to tax such kind of
importation. XYZ Corporation is concerned that said ruling may have a retroactive effect,
which means that all their importations done before the issuance of the second ruling
could be subject to tax.
a. What are BIR rulings?
b. What is required to make a BIR ruling of first impression a valid one?
c. Does a BIR ruling have a retroactive effect, considering the principle that tax
exemptions should be interpreted strictly against the taxpayer?
What is the nature of the taxing power of the provinces, municipalities and cities? How
will the local government units be able to exercise their taxing powers?
V.
(10%)
II.
(10%)
ABC Corporation sold a real property in Malolos, Bulacan to XYZ Corporation. The
property has been classified as residential and with a zonal valuation of P1, 000 per square
meter. The capital gains tax was paid based on the zonal value. The Revenue District
Officer (RDO), however, refused to issue the Certificate Authorizing Registration for the
reason that based on his ocular inspection the property should have a higher zonal
valuation determined by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue because the area is
already a commercial area. Accordingly, the RDO wanted to make a recomputation of the
taxes due by using the fair market value appearing in a nearby bank's valuation list which
is practically double the existing zonal value. The RDO also wanted to assess a donor's tax
on the difference between the selling price based on the zonal value and the fair market
value appearing in a nearby bank's valuation list.
The Local Government Code took effect on January 1, 1992.

PLDT's legislative franchise was granted sometime before 1992. Its franchise provides
that PLDT will only pay 3% franchise tax in lieu of all taxes.
The legislative franchises of Smart and Globe Telecoms were granted in 1998. Their
legislative franchises state that they will pay only 5% franchise tax in lieu of all taxes.
The Province of Zamboanga del Norte passed an ordinance in 1997 that imposes a local
franchise tax on all telecommunication companies operating within the province. The tax
is 50% of 1% of the gross annual receipts of the preceding calendar year based on the
incoming receipts, or receipts realized, within territorial jurisdiction.
Is the ordinance valid? Are PLDT, Smart and Globe liable to pay franchise taxes? Reason
briefly.
III.
(5%)
a. Does the RDO have the authority or discretion to unilaterally use the fair market
value as the basis for determining the capital gains tax and not the zonal value as
determined by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue? Reason briefly.
b. Should the difference in the supposed taxable value be legally subject to donor's
tax? Reason briefly.
VI.
(5%)
IX.
(10%)
Z is a Filipino immigrant living in the United States for more than 10 years. He is retired
and he came back to the Philippines as a balikbayan. Every time he comes to the
Philippines, he stays here for about a month. He regularly receives a pension from his
former employer in the United States, amounting to US$1, 000 a month. While in the
Philippines, with his pension pay from his former employer, he purchased three
condominium units in Makati which he is renting out for P15, 000 a moth each.
Weber Realty Company which owns a three-hectare land in Antipolo entered into a Joint
Venture Agreement (JVA) with Prime Development Company for the development of said
parcel of land. Weber Realty as owner of the land contributed the land to the Joint Venture
and Prime Development agreed to develop the same into a residential subdivision and
construct residential houses thereon. They agreed that they would divide the lots between
them.
a. Does the US$1, 000 pension become taxable because he is now residing in the
Philippines? Reason briefly.
a. Does the JVA entered into by and between Weber and Prime create a separate
taxable entity? Explain briefly.
b. Is his purchase of the three condominium units subject to any tax? Reason briefly.
b. Are the allocation and distribution of the saleable lots to Weber and prime subject
to income tax and to expanded withholding tax? Explain briefly.
VII.
(5%)
Antonia Santos, 30 years old, gainfully employed, is the sister of Edgardo Santos. She
died in an airplane crash. Edgardo is a lawyer and he negotiated with the airline company
and insurance company and they were able to a agree total settlement of P10 Million. This
is what Antonia would have earned as somebody who was gainfully employed. Edgardo
was her only heir.
a. Is the P10 Million subject to estate tax? Reason briefly.
b. Should Edgardo report the P10 Million as his income being Antonia's only heir?
Reason briefly.
VIII.
(5%)
Nutrition Chippy Corporation gives all its employees (rank and file, supervisors and
managers) one sack of rice every month valued at P800 per sack. During an audit
investigation made by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), the BIR assessed the
company for failure to withhold the corresponding withholding tax on the amount
equivalent to the one sack of rice received by all the employees, contending that the sack
of rice is considered as additional compensation for the rank and file employees and
additional fringe benefit for the supervisions and managers. Therefore, the value of the
one sack of rice every month should be considered as part of the compensation of the rank
and file subject to tax. For the supervisors and managers, the employer should be the one
assessed pursuant to Section 33 (a) of the NIRC. Is there a legal basis for the assessment
made by the BIR? Explain your answer.
c. Is the sale by Weber or Prime of their respective shares in the saleable lots to third
parties subject to income tax and to expanded withholding tax? Explain briefly.
X.
(10%)
Noel Santos is a very bright computer science graduate. He was hired by Hewlett Packard.
To entice him to accept the offer for employment, he was offered the arrangement that part
of is compensation would be an insurance policy with a face value of P20 Million. The
parents of Noel are made the beneficiaries of the insurance policy.
a. Will the proceeds of the insurance form part of the income of the parents of Noel
and be subject to income tax? Reason briefly.
b. Can the company deduct from its gross income the amount of the premium?
Briefly.
XI.
(5%)
The Congregation of the Mary Immaculate donated a land a dormitory building located
along Espaa St. in favor of the Sisters of the Holy Cross, a group of nuns operating a free
clinic and high school teaching basic spiritual values. Is the donation subject to donor's
tax? Reason Briefly.
XII.
(5%)
Remedios, a resident citizen, died on November 10, 2006. She died leaving three
condominium units in Quezon City valued at P5 Million each. Rodolfo was her only heir.
He reported her death on December 5, 2006 and filed the estate tax, he asked the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue to give him one year to pay the estate tax due. The
Commissioner approved the request for extension of time provided that the estate tax be
computed on the basis of the value of the property at the time of payment of the tax.
c. Is Alpha Corporation subject to income tax on the exchange of property? If so,

what is the tax base and rate? Explain. ( 3% )
II
ABC Corporation won a tax refund case for P50 Million. Upon execution of the
judgement and when trying to get the tax Credit Certificates (TCC) representing the
refund, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) refused to issue the TCC on the basis of the
fact that the corporation is under audit by the BIR and it has a potential tax liability. Is
there a valid justification for the BIR to withhold the issuance of the TCC? Explain your
answer briefly.
Jose Cerna, Filipino citizen, married to Maria Cerna, died in a vehicular accident in NLEX
on July 10, 2007. The spouses owned, among others, a 100-hectare agricultural land in
Sta. Rosa, Laguna with current fair market value of P20 million, which was subject to
matter of a Joint Venture Agreement about to be implemented with Star Land Corporation
( SLC ), a well-known real estate development company. He bought the said real property
for P2 million fifty years ago. On January 5,2008, the administrator of the estate and SLC
jointly announced their big plans to start conversion and development of the agricultural
lands in Sta. Rosa, Laguna, into first-class residential and commercial centers. As a result,
the prices of real properties in the locality have doubled. The administrator of the Estate of
Jose Cernan filed the estate tax return on January 9, 2008, by including in the gross estate
the real property at P2 million. After 9 months, the BIR issued deficiency estate tax
assessment, by valuing the real property at P40 million. A ) Is the BIR correct in valuing
the real property at P40 million? Explain. ( 3% ) B ) If you disagree, what is the correct
value to used for estate tax purposes? Explain. ( 3% )
NOTHING FOLLOWS.
III
a. Does the Commissioner of Internal Revenue have the power to extend the
payment of estate tax? If so, what are the requirements to allow such extension?
b. Does the condition that the basis of the estate tax will be the value at the time of
the payment have legal basis? Reason briefly.
XIII.
(5%)
2008
TAXATION LAW
I.
In January 1970, Juan Gonzales bought one hectare of agricultural land in Laguna for
P100,000. This property has a current fair market value of P10 million in view of the
construction of a concrete road traversing the property. Juan Gonzales agreed to exchange
his agricultural lot in Laguna for a one-half hectare residential property located in
Batangas, with a fair market value of P10 million, owned by Alpha Corporation, a
domestic corporation engaged in the purchase and sale of real property. Alpha Corporation
acquired the property in 2007 for P9 million.
a. What is the nature of real properties exchanged for tax purposes - capital asset or
ordinary asset? Explain. ( 3% )
b. Is Juan Gonzales subject to income tax on the exchange of property? If so, what is
the tax based and rate? Explain. ( 3% )
DEF Corporation is wholly owned subsidiary of DEF, Inc., California, USA. Starting
December 15, 2004, DEF Corporation paid annual royalties to DEF, Inc., for the use of the
latter's software, for which the former, as with holding agent of the government, withheld
and remitted to the BIR the 15% final tax based on the gross royalty payments. The
withholding tax return was filed and tax remitted to the BIR on January 10 of the
following year. On April 10, 2007 DEF Corporation filed written claim for tax credit with
the BIR, arising from erroneously paid income taxes covering the years 2004 and 2005.
The following day, DEF Corporation filed a petition for review with the court of Tax
Appeals involving the tax credit claim for 2004 and 2005.
a. As a BIR lawyer handling the case, would you raise the defense of prescription in
your answer to the claim for tax credit? Explain. ( 4% )
b. Can the BIR lawyer raise the defense that DEF Corporation is not the proper party
to file such claim for tax credit? Explain. ( 3% )
IV
JKL Corporation is a domestic corporation engaged in the importation and sale of motor
vehicles in the Philippines and is duly registered with the Subic Bay Metropolitan
Authority ( SBMA ). In December 2007, it imported several second-hand motor vehicles
from Japan and Korea, which it stores in a warehouse in Subic Bay. It sold these motor
vehicles in April 2008, to persons residing in the customs territory.
Cash
a. Are the importations of motor vehicles from abroad subject to customs duties and
value added taxes? Explain. ( 4% )
Cars
P2,000,000.00
500,000.00
b. if they are taxable, when must the duties and taxes be paid? What are the bases for
and purposes of computing customs duties and VAT? To whom must the duties
and VAT be paid? Explain. ( 3% )
Land
5,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
V
Maria Suerte, a Filipino citizen, purchased a lot in Makati City in 1980 at a price of P1
million. Said property has been leased to MAS Corporation, a domestic corporation
engaged in manufacturing paper products, owned 99% by Maria Suerte. In October 2007,
EIP Corporation, a real estate developer, expressed its desire to buy the Makati property at
its fair market value P300 million, payable as follows : (a) P60 million down payment;
and (b) balance, payable equally in twenty four (24) monthly consecutive installments.
Upon the advice of a tax lawyer, Maria Suerte exchanged her Makati property for shares
of stock of MAS Corporation. A BIR ruling, confirming the tax-free exchange of property
for shares of stock, was secured from the BIR National Office and a Certificate
Authorizing Registration was issued by the Revenue District Officer (RDO) where the
property was located. Subsequently, she sold her entire stock holdings in MAS
Corporation to EIP Corporation for P300 million. In view of the tax advice, Maria Suerte
paid only the capital gains tax of P29,895,000 ( P100,000 x 5% plus P298,900,00 x 10% ),
instead of the corporate income tax of P104,650,00 ( 35% on P299 million gain from sale
of real property ). After evaluating the capital gains tax payment, the RDO wrote a letter
to Maria Suerte, Slating that she commited tax evasion.
P10,000,000.00
Residential House
4,000,000.00
Mortgage Payable
2,500,000.00
Funeral Expenses
300,000.00
P1,200,00.00
a. Is the Estate of Jaime Asuncion liable for estate tax? Explain. ( 4% )

b. Is vanishing deduction applicable to the Estate of Assunta Asuncion? Explain
( 4% )
VII
After examining the books and records of EDS Corporation, the 2004 final assessment
notice, showing basic tax of P1,000,000 deficiency interest of P400,000 and due date for
payment of April 30, 2007, but without the demand letter, was mailed and released by the
BIR on April 15, 2007. The registered letter, containing the tax assessment, was received
by the EDS Corporation on April 25, 2007
a. What is an assessment notice? What are the requisites of a valid assessment?
Explain ( 3% )
b. As tax lawyer of EDS Corporation, what legal defense(s) would you raised
against the assessment? Explain. ( 3% ).
Is the contention of the RDO tenable? Or was it tax avoidance that Maria Suerte had
resorted to? Explain. ( 6% )
VI
VIII
While driving his car to Baquio last month, Pedro Asuncion, together with his wife
Assunta, and only son Jaime, met an accident that caused the instantaneous death of
Jaime. The following day, Assunta also died in the hospital. The spouses and their son had
the following assets and liabilities at the time of death :
The City of Manila enacted an ordinance, imposing a 5% tax on gross receipts on rentals
of space in privately-owned public markets. BAT Corporation questioned the validity of
the ordinance, stating that the tax is an income tax, which cannot be imposed by the city
government.
Assunta
Exclusive
Conjugal
Jaime
Exclusive
Do you agree with the position of BAT Corporation? Explain. ( 5% )

IX
William Antonio imported into the Philippines a luxury car worth US$100,00. This car
was, however, declared only for US$20,000 and corresponding customs duties and taxes
were paid thereon. Subsequently, the Collector of Customs discovered the
underdeclaration and he initiated forfeiture proceedings of the imported car.
a. may the Collector of Customs declare the imported car forfeited in favor of the
government? Explain. ( 3% )
b. Are forfeiture proceedings of goods illegally imported criminal in nature? Explain
( 3% )
X
John McDonald, a U.S. Citizen residing in Makati City, bought shares of stock of a
domestic corporation whose shares are listed and traded in the Philippine Stock Exchange
at the price of P2 million Yesterday, he sold the shares of stock through his favorite
Makati stockbroker at a gain of P200,000.
a. Is John McDonald subject to Philippine Income Tax on the sale of his shares
through his stockbroker? Is he liable for any other tax? Explain. ( 3% )
association of unit owner in Greenhills Tower, San Juan City. To be able to reduce the
association dues being collected from the unit owners, the Board of Directors of the
corporation agreed to lease part of the ground floor of the condominium building to DEF
Saving Bank for P120,000 a month or P1.44 million for the year, starting January 2007.
a. Is the non-stock, non-profit association liable for value added tax in 2007? If your
answer is in the negative, is it liable for another kind of business tax? (4%)
b. Will the association be liable for value added tax in 2008 if it increases the rental
to P150,000 a month beginning January 2008? Explain. (3%)
XIII
MNO Corporation was organized on July 1, 2006, to engage in trading of school supplies,
with principal place of business in Cubao, Quezon City. Its book of account and income
statement showing gross sales as follows:
b. If John McDonald deriectly sold the shares to his best friend, who is another U.S.
Citizen residing in Makati, at a gain of P200,000. Is he liable for Philippine
Income Tax? If so, what is the ntax base and rate? ( 3% )
XI
Pedro Manalo, A Filipino citizen residing in Makati City, owns a vacation house and lot in
San Francisco, California, U.S.A, which he acquired in 2000 for P15 million. On January
10, 2006 he sold said real property to Juan Mayaman, another Filipino citizen residing in
Quezon City, for P20 million. On February 9, 2006 Manalo filed the capital gains tax
return and paid P1.2 million representing 6% capital gain tax. Since Manalo did not derive
any ordinary income, no income tax returnn was filed by him for 2006. After the tax audit
conducted in 2007, the BIR officer assessed Manalo for deficiency income tax computed
as follows: P5 million ( P20 million less P 15 million ) x 35% = P1.75 million, without the
capital gains tax paid being allowed as tax credit. Manalo consulted a real estate broker
who said that the P1.2 million capital gains tax should be credited from P1.75 million
deficiency income tax.
a. Is the BIR officer's tax assessment correct? Explain. ( 3% )
b. If you were hired by Manalo as his tax consultant, what advice would you give
him to protect his interest? Explain. ( 3% )
XII
Greenhills Condominium Corporation incorporated in 2001 is a non-stock, non profit
July 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006
P 5,0000,000.
January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007
P 10,000,000.
July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007
P 15,000,000.
Since MNO Corporation adopted fiscal year ending June 30 as its taxable year for income
tax purpose, it paid its 2% business tax for fiscal year ending June 30, 2007 based on gross
dales of P15 million. However, the Quezon City Treasurer assessed the corporation for
deficiency business tax for 2007 based on gross sales of P25 million alleging that local
business taxes shall be computed based on calendar year.
a. Is the position of the city treasurer tenable? Explain. (3%)
b. May the deficiency business tax be paid in installments without surcharge and
interest? Explain. (3%)
XIV
Spouses Jose San Pedro and Clara San Pedro, both Filipino citizens, are the owners of a
residential house and lot in Quezon City. After the recent wedding of their son, Mario, to
Maria, the spouses donated said real property to them. At the time of donation, the real
property has a fair market value of P2 million.
a. Are Mario and Maria subject to income tax the value of the real property donated
to them? Explain. (4%)
b. b) Are Jose and Clara subject to donor's tax? If so, how much is the taxable gift of
each spouse and what rate shall be applied to the gift? Explain. (4%)
XV
II
Enumerate the four (4) inherent limitations on taxation. Explain each item briefly. (4%)
III
In 2007, spouses Renato and Judy Garcia opened peso and dollar deposits at the
Philippine branch of the Hong Kong Bank in Manila. Renato is an overseas worker in
Hong Kong while Judy lives and works in Manila. During the year, the bank paid interest
income of P10,000 on the peso deposit and USS1,000 on the dollar deposit. The bank
withheld final income tax equivalent to 20% of the entire interest income and remitted the
same to the BIR.
Melissa inherited from her father a 300-square-meter lot. At the time of her father's death
on March 14, 1995, the property was valued at P720,000.00. On February 28, 1996, to
defray the cost of the medical expenses of her sick son, she sold the lot for P600,000.00,
on cash basis. The prevailing market value of the property at the time of the sale was
P3,000.00 per square meter.
a. Is Melissa liable to pay capital gains tax on the transaction? If so, how much and
why? If not, why not? (4%)
a. Are the interest incomes on the bank deposits of spouses Renato and Judy Garcia
subject to income tax? Explain. (4%)
b. Is the bank correct in withholding the 20% final tax on the entire interest income?
Explain. (3%)
NOTHING FOLLOWS.
2009
TAXATION
PART I
I
b. Is Melissa liable to pay Value Added Tax (VAT) on the sale of the property? If so,
how much and why? If not, why not? (4%)
IV
International Technologies, Inc. (ITI) filed a claim for refund for unutilized input VAT
with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). In the course of the trial, ITI engaged the services
of an independent Certified Public Accountant (CPA) who examined the voluminous
invoices and receipts of ITI. ITI offered in evidence only the summary prepared by the
CPA, without the invoices and the receipts, and then submitted the case for decision.
Can the CTA grant ITI's claim for refund based only on the CPA's summary? Explain.
(4%)
V
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is
false. Explain your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. A law that allows taxes to be paid either in cash or in kind is valid.
b. When the financial position of the taxpayer demonstrates a clear inability to pay
the tax, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may validly compromise the tax
liability.
c. The doctrine of equitable recoupment allows a taxpayer whose claim for refund
has prescribed to offset tax liabilities with his claim of overpayment.
Jessie brought into the Philippines a foreign-made luxury car, and paid less than the actual
taxes and duties due. Due to the discrepancy, the Bureau of Customs instituted seizure
proceedings and issued a warrant of seizure and detention. The car, then parked inside a
pay parking garage, was seized and brought by government agents to a government
impounding facility. The Collector of Customs denied Jessie's request for the withdrawal
of the warrant.
Aggrieved, Jessie filed against the Collector a criminal complaint for usurpation of
judicial functions on the ground that only a judge may issue a warrant of search and
seizure.
d. A law imposing a tax on income of religious institutions derived from the sale of
religious articles is valid.
a. Resolve with reasons Jessie's criminal complaint. (4%)
e. A false return and a fraudulent return are one and the same.
b. Would your answer be the same if the luxury car was seized while parked inside
the garage of Jessie's residence? Why or why not? (4%)
VI
The Sangguniang Bayan of the Municipality of Sampaloc, Quezon, passed an ordinance
imposing a storage fee of ten centavos (P0.10) for every 100 kilos of copra deposited in
any bodega within the Municipality's jurisdiction. The Metropolitan Manufacturing
Corporation (MMC), with principal office in Makati, is engaged in the manufacture of
soap, edible oil, margarine, and other coconut oil-based products. It has a warehouse in
Sampaloc, Quezon, used as storage space for the copra purchased in Sampaloc and nearby
towns before the same is shipped to Makati. MMC goes to court to challenge the validity
of the ordinance, demanding the refund of the storage fees it paid under protest.
Is the ordinance valid? Explain your answer. (4%)
VII
Kenya International Airlines (KIA) is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of
Kenya. It is not licensed to do business in the Philippines. Its commercial airplanes do not
operate within Philippine territory, or service passengers embarking from Philippine
airports. The firm is represented in the Philippines by its general agent, Philippine Airlines
(PAL), a Philippine corporation.
KIA sells airplane tickets through PAL, and these tickets are serviced by KIA airplanes
outside the Philippines. The total sales of airline tickets transacted by PAL for KIA in
1997 amounted to P2,968,156.00. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed KIA
deficiency income taxes at the rate of 35% on its taxable income, finding that KIA's
airline ticket sales constituted income derived from sources within the Philippines.
KIA filed a protest on the ground that the P2,968,156.00 should be considered as income
derived exclusively from sources outside the Philippines since KIA only serviced
passengers outside Philippine territory.
Is the position of KIA tenable? Reasons. (4%)
VII
Kenya International Airlines (KIA) is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of
Kenya. It is not licensed to do business in the Philippines. Its commercial airplanes do not
operate within Philippine territory, or service passengers embarking from Philippine
airports. The firm is represented in the Philippines by its general agent, Philippine Airlines
(PAL), a Philippine corporation.
KIA sells airplane tickets through PAL, and these tickets are serviced by KIA airplanes
outside the Philippines. The total sales of airline tickets transacted by PAL for KIA in
1997 amounted to P2,968,156.00. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed KIA
deficiency income taxes at the rate of 35% on its taxable income, finding that KIA's
airline ticket sales constituted income derived from sources within the Philippines.
KIA filed a protest on the ground that the P2,968,156.00 should be considered as income
derived exclusively from sources outside the Philippines since KIA only serviced
passengers outside Philippine territory.
Is the position of KIA tenable? Reasons. (4%)
VIII
The City of Manila enacted Ordinance No. 55-66 which imposes a municipal occupation
tax on persons practicing various professions in the city. Among those subjected to the
occupation tax were lawyers. Atty. Mariano Batas, who has a law office in Manila, pays
the ordinance-imposed occupation tax under protest. He goes to court to assail the validity
of the ordinance for being discriminatory. Decide with reasons. (3%)
IX
Republic Power Corporation (RPC) is a government-owned and controlled corporation
engaged in the supply, generation and transmission of electric power. In 2005, in order to
provide electricity to Southern Tagalog provinces, RPC entered into an agreement with
Jethro Energy Corporation (JEC), for the lease of JEC's power barges which shall be
berthed at the port of Batangas City. The contract provides that JEC shall own the power
barges and the fixtures, fittings, machinery, and equipment therein, all of which JEC shall
supply at its own cost, and that JEC shall operate, manage and maintain the power barges
for the purpose of converting the fuel of RPC into electricity. The contract also stipulates
that all real estate taxes and assessments, rates and other charges, in respect of the power
barges, shall be for the account of RPC.
In 2007, JEC received an assessment of real property taxes on the power barges from the
Assessor of Batangas City. JEC sought reconsideration of the assessment on the ground
that the power barges are exempt from real estate taxes under Section 234 [c] of R.A.
7160 as they are actually, directly and exclusively used by RPC, a government-owned and
controlled corporation. Furthermore, even assuming that the power barges are subject to
real property tax, RPC should be held liable therefor, in accordance with the terms of the
lease agreement. Is the contention of JEC correct? Explain your answer. (4%)
X
ABCD Corporation (ABCD) is a domestic corporation with individual and corporate
shareholders who are residents of the United States. For the 2 nd quarter of 1983, these
U.S.-based individual and corporate stockholders received cash dividends from the
corporation. The corresponding withholding tax on dividend income --- 30% for
individual and 35% for corporate non-resident stockholders --- was deducted at source and
remitted to the BIR.
On May 15, 1984, ABCD filed with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue a formal claim
for refund, alleging that under the RP-US Tax Treaty, the deduction withheld at source as
tax on dividends earned was fixed at 25% of said income. Thus, ABCD asserted that it
overpaid the withholding tax due on the cash dividends given to its non-resident
stockholders in the U.S. The Commissioner denied the claim.
On January 17, 1985, ABCD filed a petition with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA)
reiterating its demand for refund.
a. Does ABCD Corporation have the legal personality to file the refund on behalf of
its non-resident stockholders? Why or why not? (3%)
b. Is the contention of ABCD Corporation correct? Why or why not? (3%)
PART II
XI
file one income tax return to cover all the income of both spouses, and the tax is
computed on the aggregate taxable income of the spouses.
XII
YYY Corporation engaged the services of the Manananggol Law Firm in 2006 to defend
the corporation's title over a property used in the business. For the legal services rendered
in 2007, the law firm billed the corporation only in 2008. The corporation duly paid.
YYY Corporation claimed this expense as a deduction from gross income in its 2008
return, because the exact amount of the expense was determined only in 2008. Is YYY's
claim of deduction proper? Reasons. (4%)
XIII
In 1999, Xavier purchased from his friend, Yuri, a painting for P500,000.00. The fair
market value (FMV) of the painting at the time of the purchase was P1-million. Yuri paid
all the corresponding taxes on the transaction. In 2001, Xavier died. In his last will and
testament, Xavier bequeathed the painting, already worth P1.5-million, to his only son,
Zandro. The will also granted Zandro the power to appoint his wife, Wilma, as successor
to the painting in the event of Zandro's death. Zandro died in 2007, and Wilma succeeded
to the property.
Raffy and Wena, husband and wife, are both employed by XXX Corporation. After office
hours, they jointly manage a coffee shop at the ground floor of their house. The coffee
shop is registered in the name of both spouses. Which of the following is the correct way
to prepare their income tax return? Write the letter only. DO NOT EXPLAIN YOUR
ANSWER. (2%)
a. Should the painting be included in the gross estate of Xavier in 2001 and thus, be
subject to estate tax? Explain. (3%)
b. Should the painting be included in the gross estate of Zandro in 2007 and thus, be
subject to estate tax? Explain. (3%)
c. May a vanishing deduction be allowed in either or both of the estates? Explain.
(3%)
a. Raffy will declare as his income the salaries of both spouses, while Wena will
declare the income from the coffee shop.
b. Wena will declare the combined compensation income of the spouses, and Raffy
will declare the income from the coffee shop.
c. All the income will be declared by Raffy alone, because only one consolidated
return is required to be filed by the spouses.
d. Raffy will declare his own compensation income and Wena will declare hers. The
income from the coffee shop shall be equally divided between them. Each spouse
shall be taxed separately on their corresponding taxable income to be covered by
one consolidated return for the spouses.
e. Raffy will declare his own compensation income and Wena will declare hers. The
income from the coffee shop shall be equally divided between them. Raffy will
XIV
Emiliano Paupahan is engaged in the business of leasing out several residential apartment
units he owns. The monthly rental for each unit ranges from P8,000.00 to P10,000.00. His
gross rental income for one year is P1,650,000.00. He consults you on whether it is
necessary for him to register as a VAT taxpayer. What legal advice will you give him, and
why? (4%)
XV
Miguel, a citizen and resident of Mexico, donated US$1,000.00 worth of stocks in Barack
Motors Corporation, a Mexican company, to his legitimate son, Miguelito, who is residing
in the Philippines and about to be married to a Filipino girlfriend. Mexico does not impose
any transfer tax of whatever nature on all gratuitous transfers of property.
a. Is Miguel entitled to claim a dowry exclusion? Why or why not? (3%)
a. What advice will you give the trustee? Explain. (3%)
b. Is Miguel entitled to the rule of reciprocity in order to be exempt from the

Philippine donor's tax? Why or why not? (3%)
b. Will your advice be the same if the trustee is directed to accumulate the rental
income and distribute the same only when the beneficiary reaches the age of
majority? Why or why not? (3%)
XVI
Ernesto, a Filipino citizen and a practicing lawyer, filed his income tax return for 2007
claiming optional standard deductions. Realizing that he has enough documents to
substantiate his profession-connected expenses, he now plans to file an amended income
tax return for 2007, in order to claim itemized deductions, since no audit has been
commenced by the BIR on the return he previously filed. Will Ernesto be allowed to
amend his return? Why or why not? (4%)
XX
Masarap Food Corporation (MFC) incurred substantial advertising expenses in order to
protect its brand franchise for one of its line products. In its income tax return, MFC
included the advertising expense as deduction from gross income, claiming it as an
ordinary business expense. Is MFC correct? Explain. (3%)
-NOTHING FOLLOWS-
XVII
A final assessment notice was issued by the BIR on June 13, 2000, and received by the
taxpayer on June 15, 2000. The taxpayer protested the assessment on July 31, 2000. The
protest was initially given due course, but was eventually denied by the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue in a decision dated June 15, 2005. The taxpayer then filed a petition for
review with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA), but the CTA dismissed the same.
a. Is the CTA correct in dismissing the petition for review? Explain your answer.
(4%)
b. Assume that the CTA's decision dismissing the petition for review has become
final. May the Commissioner legally enforce collection of the delinquent tax?
Explain. (4%)
2010
TAXATION
PART I
I
True or False.
a. In civil cases involving the collection of internal revenue taxes, prescription is
construed strictly against the government and liberally in favor of the taxpayer.
(1%)
XVIII
b. In criminal cases involving tax offenses punishable under the National Internal
Revenue Code (NIRC), prescription is construed strictly against the government.
(1%)
A taxpayer received an assessment notice from the BIR on February 3, 2009. The
following day, he filed a protest, in the form of a request for reinvestigation, against the
assessment and submitted all relevant documents in support of the protest. On September
11, 2009, the taxpayer, apprehensive because he had not yet received notice of a decision
by the Commissioner on his protest, sought your advice.
c. In criminal cases where the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has exclusive original
jurisdiction, the right to file a separate civil action for the recovery of taxes may
be reserved. (1%)
What remedy or remedies are available to the taxpayer? Explain. (4%)
d. Proceedings before the CTA in the exercise of its exclusive original jurisdiction
are in the nature of trial de novo. (1%)
XIX
Johnny transferred a valuable 10-door commercial apartment to a designated trustee,
Miriam, naming in the trust instrument Santino, Johnny's 10-year old son, as the sole
beneficiary. The trustee is instructed to distribute the yearly rentals amounting to
P720,000.00. The trustee consults you if she has to pay the annual income tax on the
rentals received from the commercial apartment.
e. Judgments, resolutions or orders of the Regional Trial Court in the exercise of

its original jurisdiction involving criminal offenses arising from violations of the
NIRC are appealable to the CTA, which shall hear the cases en banc. (1%)
II
a. What is the "all events test"? Explain briefly. (2%)
The FAN was received by the corporation on May 10, 2010, following which or on May
25, 2010, it filed its protest against it.
b. What is the "immediacy test"? Explain briefly. (2%)

c. What is the "rational basis" test? Explain briefly. (2%)
d. What is the effect of the execution by a taxpayer of a "waiver of the statute of
limitations" on his defense of prescription? (2%)
e. What is the basis for the computation of business tax on contractors under the
Local Government Code? (2%)
f.
How are retiring businesses taxed under the Local Government Code? (2%)
The CIR denied the protest on the ground that the assessment had already become final
and executory, the corporation having failed to protest the PAN.
Is the CIR correct? Explain. (5%)
V
Does the Court of Appeals have the power to review compromise agreements forged by
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and a taxpayer? Explain. (5%)
VI
III
Mirador, Inc., a domestic corporation, filed its Annual Income Tax Return for its taxable
year 2008 on April 15, 2009. In the Return, it reflected an income tax overpayment of
P1,000,000.00 and indicated its choice to carry-over the overpayment as an automatic tax
credit against its income tax liabilities in subsequent years.
On April 15, 2010, it filed its Annual Income Tax Return for its taxable year 2009
reflecting a taxable loss and an income tax overpayment for the current year 2009 in the
amount of P500,000.00 and its income tax overpayment for the prior year 2008 of
P1,000,000.00.
In its 2009 Return, the corporation indicated its option to claim for refund the total income
tax overpayment of P1,500,000.00
Choose which of the following statements is correct.
a. Mirador, Inc. may claim as refund the total income tax overpayment of
P1,500,000.00 reflected in its income tax return for its taxable year 2009;
b. It may claim as refund the amount of P500,000.00 representing its income tax
overpayment for its taxable year 2009; or
c. No
amount
may
be
Explain the basis of your answer. (5%)
claimed
as
refund.
IV
On March 10, 2010, Continental, Inc. received a preliminary assessment notice (PAN)
dated March 1, 2010 issued by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) for
deficiency income tax for its taxable year 2008. It failed to protest the PAN. The CIR
thereupon issued a final assessment notice (FAN) with letter of demand on April 30, 2010.
Based on the Affidavit of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR), an Information for
failure to file income tax return under Section 255 of the National Internal Revenue Code
(NIRC) was filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) with the Manila Regional Trial
Court (RTC) against XX, a Manila resident.
XX moved to quash the Information on the ground that the RTC has no jurisdiction in
view of the absence of a formal deficiency tax assessment issued by the CIR.
Is a prior assessment necessary before an Information for violation of Section 255 of the
NIRC could be filed in court? Explain. (4%)
VII
What are the conditions that must be complied with before the Court of Tax Appeals may
suspend the collection of national internal revenue taxes? (3%)
VIII
What is the rule on appeal from decisions of the Collector of Customs in protest and
seizure cases? When is the decision of the Collector of Customs appealable to the Court of
Tax Appeals? Explain. (5%)
IX
On May 15, 2009, La Manga Trading Corporation received a deficiency business tax
assessment of P1,500,000.00 from the Pasay City Treasurer. On June 30, 2009, the
corporation contested the assessment by filing a written protest with the City Treasurer.
On October 10, 2009, the corporation received a collection letter from the City Treasurer,
drawing it to file on October 25, 2009 an appeal against the assessment before the Pasay
Regional Trial Court (RTC).
a. Was the protest of the corporation filed on time? Explain. (3%)
b. Was the appeal with the Pasay RTC filed on time? Explain. (3%)
services are paid for in US$ and duly accounted for with the Bangko Sentral ng
Pilipinas. (3%)
PART II
c. Sale of orchids by a flower shop which raises its flowers in Tagaytay. (3%)
X
True or False. (1% each)
a. Gains realized by the investor upon redemption of shares of stock in a mutual
fund company are exempt from income tax.
b. A corporation can claim the optional standard deduction equivalent to 40% of its
gross sales or receipts, as the case may be.
c. Premium payment for health insurance of an individual who is an employee in an
amount of P2,500 per year may be deducted from gross income if his gross salary
per year is not more than P250,000.
XII
Ferremaro, Inc., a manufacturer of handcrafted shoes, maintains its principal office in
Cubao, Quezon City. It has branches/sales offices in Cebu and Davao. Its factory is
located in Marikina City where most of its workers live. Its principal office in Quezon
City is also a sales office.
Sales of finished products for calendar year 2009 in the amount of P10 million were made
at the following locations:
d. The Tax Code allows an individual taxpayer to pay in two equal installments, the
first installment to be paid at the time the return is filed, and the second on or
before July 15 of the same year, if his tax due exceeds P2,000.
e. An individual taxpayer can adopt either the calendar or fiscal period for purposes
of filing his income tax return.
f.
The capitalization rules may be resorted to by the BIR in order to compel

corporate taxpayers to declare dividends to their stockholders regularly.
g. Informers reward is subject to a final withholding tax of 10%.

h. A non-resident alien who stays in the Philippines for less than 180 days during the
calendar year shall be entitled to personal exemption not to exceed the amount
allowed to citizens of the Philippines by the country of which he is subject or
citizen.
XI
Are the following transactions subject to VAT? If yes, what is the applicable rate for each
transaction. State the relevant authority/ies for your answer.
a. Construction by XYZ Construction Co. of concrete barriers for the Asian
Development Bank in Ortigas Center to prevent car bombs from ramming the
ADB gates along ADB Avenue in Mandaluyong City. (3%)
b. Call Center operated by a domestic enterprise in Makati that handles exclusively
the reservations of a hotel chain which are all located in North America. The
i)
Cebu branch
25%
ii)
Davao branch
15%
iii)
Quezon City branch
60%
Total
100%
Where should the applicable local taxes on the shoes be paid? Explain. (3%)
XIII
XYZ Shipping Corporation is a branch of an international shipping line with voyages
between Manila and the West Coast of the U.S. The companys vessels load and unload
cargoes at the Port of Manila, albeit it does not have a branch or sales office in Manila. All
the bills of lading and invoices are issued by the branch office in Makati which is also the
companys principal office.
The City of Manila enacted an ordinance levying a 2% tax on gross receipts of shipping
lines using the Port of Manila.
Can the City Government of Manila legally impose said levy on the corporation? Explain.
(3%)
XIV
A inherited a two-storey building in Makati from his father, a real estate broker in the
60s. A group of Tibetan monks approached A and offered to lease the building in order to
use it as a venue for their Buddhist rituals and ceremonies. A accepted the rental of P1
million for the whole year.
The following year, the City Assessor issued an assessment against A for non-payment of
real property taxes.
Funeral Expenses
Is the assessor justified in assessing As deficiency real property taxes? Explain. (3%)
Legal fees for the settlement of

the estate
500,000
XV
Don Sebastian, single but head of the family, Filipino, and resident of Pasig City, died
intestate on November 15, 2009. He left the following properties and interests:
Medical expenses of last illness 600,000
House and lot (family home) in P

Pasig
800,000
Vacation house and lot in 1,500,00
Florida, USA
0
Agricultural land in Naic,
2,000,00
Cavite which he inherited from
0
his father
Car which is being used by his
brother in Cavite
500,000
Proceeds of life insurance
where he named his estate as 1,000,00
irrevocable beneficiary
0
Household
appliances
furnitures
and 1,000,00
0
Claims against a cousin who

has assets of P10,000 and
liabilities of P100,000
100,000
P
250,000
Claims against the estate
300,000
The compulsory heirs of Don Sebastian approach you and seek your assistance in the
settlement of his estate for which they have agreed to the above-stated professional fees.
Specifically, they request you to explain and discuss with them the following questions.
You oblige:
a. What are the properties and interests that should be included in the computation of
the gross estate of the decedent? Explain. (2.5%)
b. What is the net taxable estate of the decedent? Explain. (2.5%)
c. When is the due date for filing and payment of the applicable tax return and tax?
Are these dates extendible? If so, under what conditions or requirements? (2.5%)
d. If X, one of the compulsory heirs, renounces his share in the inheritance in favor
of the other co-heirs, is there any tax implication of Xs renunciation? What about
the other coheirs? (2.5%)
XVI
A is a travelling salesman working full time for Nu Skin Products. He receives a monthly
salary plus 3% commission on his sales in a Southern province where he is based. He
regularly uses his own car to maximize his visits even to far flung areas. One fine day a
group of militants seized his car. He was notified the following day by the police that the
marines and the militants had a bloody encounter and his car was completely destroyed
after a grenade hit it.
Shares of stock in ABC Corp, a

domestic enterprise
100,000
A wants to file a claim for casualty loss. Explain the legal basis of your tax advice. (3%)
The expenses and charges on the estate are

as follows:
In 2009, Caruso, a resident Filipino citizen, received dividend income from a U.S.-based
corporation which owns a chain of Filipino restaurants in the West Coast, U.S.A. The
XVII
dividend remitted to Caruso is subject to U.S. withholding tax with respect to a nonresident alien like Caruso.
a. What will be your advice to Caruso in order to lessen the impact of possible
double taxation on the same income? (3%)
b. Would your answer in A. be the same if Caruso became a U.S. immigrant in 2008
and had become a non-resident Filipino citizen? Explain the difference in
treatment for Philippine income tax purposes. (3%)
XVIII
(B) That tax money is being extracted and spent in violation of the
constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of communication.
(C) That she is filing the case in behalf of a substantial number of taxpayers.
(D) That text messages are an important part of the lives of the people she
represents.
(3) There is no taxable income until such income is recognized. Taxable income is
recognized when the
(A) taxpayer fails to include the income in his income tax return.
ABC, a domestic corporation, entered into a software license agreement with XYZ, a nonresident foreign corporation based in the U.S. Under the agreement which the parties
forged in the U.S., XYZ granted ABC the right to use a computer system program and to
avail of technical know-how relative to such program. In consideration for such rights,
ABC agreed to pay 5% of the revenues it receives from customers who will use and apply
the program in the Philippines.
Discuss the tax implication of the transaction. (5%)
(B) income has been actually received in money or its equivalent.

(C) income has been received, either actually or constructively.
(D) transaction that is the source of the income is consummated.
(4) Keyrand, Inc., a Philippine corporation, sold through the local stock exchange 10,000
PLDT shares that it bought 2 years ago. Keyrand sold the shares for P2 million and
realized a net gain of P200,000.00. How shall it pay tax on the transaction?
NOTHING FOLLOWS.
(A) It shall declare a P2 million gross income in its income tax return, deducting
its cost of acquisition as an expense.
2011
(B) It shall report the P200,000.00 in its corporate income tax return adjusted by
the holding period.
Bar
Set A
Examination
Questionnaire
for
Taxation
Law
(1) A municipality may levy an annual ad valorem tax on real property such as land,
building, machinery, and other improvement only if
(A) the real property is within the Metropolitan Manila Area.
(B) the real property is located in the municipality.
(C) the DILG authorizes it to do so.
(D) the power is delegated to it by the province.
(2) Anne Lapada, a student activist, wants to impugn the validity of a tax on text
messages. Aside from claiming that the law adversely affects her since she sends messages
by text, what may she allege that would strengthen her claim to the right to file a
taxpayers suit?
(A) That she is entitled to the return of the taxes collected from her in case the
court nullifies the tax measure.
(C) It shall pay 5% tax on the first P100,000.00 of the P200,000.00 and 10% tax
on the remaining P100,000.00.
(D) It shall pay a tax of one-half of 1% of the P2 million gross sales.
(5) Amaretto, Inc., imported 100 cases of Marula wine from South Africa. The shipment
was assessed duties and value-added taxes of P300,000 which Amaretto, Inc. immediately
paid. The Bureau of Customs did not, however, issue the release papers of the shipment
yet since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) needed to test the suitability of the
wine for human consumption. Is the Bureau of Customs at fault for refusing to release the
shipment just as yet?
(A) Yes, because the importation was already terminated as a result of the
payment of the taxes due.
(B) Yes, the Bureau of Customs is estopped from holding the release of the
shipment after receiving the payment.
(C) No, if the amount paid as duties and value-added taxes due on the importation
was insufficient.
(C) No. The prescriptive period started to run on March 30, 2008, hence, the 3
year period expired on April 10, 2011.
(D) No, because the Bureau of Customs has not yer issued the legal permit for
withdrawal pending the FDA's findings.
(D) Yes. Since the 3-year prescriptive period started to run on March 30, 2008, it
already expired by May 20, 2011.
(6) Which theory in taxation states that without taxes, a government would be paralyzed
for lack of power to activate and operate it, resulting in its destruction?
(9) Double taxation in its general sense means taxing the same subject twice during the
same taxing period. In this sense, double taxation
(A) Power to destroy theory
(A) violates substantive due process.
(B) Lifeblood theory
(B) does not violate substantive due process.
(C) Sumptuary theory
(C) violates the right to equal protection.
(D) Symbiotic doctrine
(D) does not violate the right to equal protection.
(7) The spouses Helena and Federico wanted to donate a parcel of land to their son
Dondon who is getting married in December, 2011. The parcel of land has a zonal
valuation of P420,000.00. What is the most efficient mode of donating the property?
(A) The spouses should first donate in 2011 a portion of the property valued at
P20,000.00 then spread the P400,000.00 equally for 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
(B) Spread the donation over a period of 5 years by the spouses donating
P100,000.00 each year from 2011 to 2015.
(C) The spouses should each donate a P110,000.00 portion of the value of the
property in 2011 then each should donate P100,000.00 in 2012.
(D) The spouses should each donate a P100,000.00 portion of the value of the
property in 2011, and another P100,000.00 each in 2012. Then, in 2013, Helena
should donate the remaining P20,000.00.
(8) Mia, a compensation income earner, filed her income tax return for the taxable year
2007 on March 30, 2008. On May 20, 2011, Mia received an assessment notice and letter
of demand covering the taxable year 2007 but the postmark on the envelope shows April
10, 2011. Her return is not a false and fraudulent return. Can Mia raise the defense of
prescription?
(10) The payor of passive income subject to final tax is required to withhold the tax from
the payment due the recipient. The withholding of the tax has the effect of
(A) a final settlement of the tax liability on the income.
(B) a credit from the recipient's income tax liability.
(C) consummating the transaction resulting in an income.
(D) a deduction in the recipient's income tax return.
(11) Guidant Resources Corporation, a corporation registered in Norway, has a 50 MW
electric power plant in San Jose, Batangas. Aside from Guidant's income from its power
plant, which among the following is considered as part of its income from sources within
the Philippines?
(A) Gains from the sale to an Ilocos Norte power plant of generators bought from
the United States.
(B) Interests earned on its dollar deposits in a Philippine bank under the Expanded
Foreign Currency Deposit System.
(C) Dividends from a two-year old Norwegian subsidiary with operations in
Zambia but derives 60% of its gross income from the Philippines.
(A) No. The 3 year prescriptive period started to run on April 15, 2008, hence, it
has not yet expired on April 10, 2011.
(D) Royalties from the use in Brazil of generator sets designed in the Philippines
by its engineers.
(B) Yes. The 3 year prescriptive period started to run on April 15, 2008, hence, it
had already expired by May 20, 2011.
(12) Tong Siok, a Chinese billionaire and a Canadian resident, died and left assets in
China valued at P80 billion and in the Philippines assets valued at P20 billion. For
Philippine estate tax purposes the allowable deductions for expenses, losses, indebtedness,
and taxes, property previously taxed, transfers for public use, and the share of his
surviving spouse in their conjugal partnership amounted to P15 billion. Tong's gross estate
for Philippine estate tax purposes is
(A) P20 billion.
(B) P5 billion.
(C) P100 billion.
(D) P85 billion.
(13) Anktryd, Inc., bought a parcel of land in 2009 for P7 million as part of its inventory
of real properties. In 2010, it sold the land for P12 million which was its zonal valuation.
In the same year, it incurred a loss of P6 million for selling another parcel of land in its
inventory. These were the only transactions it had in its real estate business. Which of the
following is the applicable tax treatment?
it has no proposed capital expenditures for 2011 and the immediate future. May Spratz be
subject to the improperly accumulated tax on its retained profits for 2009 and 2010?
(A) Yes, since the accumulated amounts are reasonable for operations in relation
to what it usually needed annually.
(B) Yes, since the accumulation is not reasonably necessary for the immediate
needs of the business.
(C) No, because there is no showing that the taxpayer's 2009 and 2010 net profit
before tax exceeded its paid-up capital.
(D) No, because the taxpayer is not shown to be a publicly-listed corporation, a
bank, or an insurance company.
(16) The actual effort exerted by the government to effect the exaction of what is due from
the taxpayer is known as
(A) Anktryd shall be subject to a tax of 6% of P12 million.
(A) assessment.
(B) Anktryd could deduct its P6 million loss from its P5 million gain.
(B) levy.
(C) Anktryd's gain of P5 million shall be subject to the holding period.
(C) payment.
(D) Anktryd's P6 million loss could not be deducted from its P5 million gain.
(D) collection.
(14) Aplets Corporation is registered under the laws of the Virgin Islands. It has extensive
operations in Southeast Asia. In the Philippines, Its products are imported and sold at a
mark-up by its exclusive distributor, Kim's Trading, Inc. The BIR compiled a record of all
the imports of Kim from Aplets and imposed a tax on Aplets net income derived from its
exports to Kim. Is the BIR correct?
(A) Yes. Aplets is a non-resident foreign corporation engaged in trade or business
in the Philippines.
(B) No. The tax should have been computed on the basis of gross revenues and
not net income.
(17) Although the power of taxation is basically legislative in character, it is NOT the
function of Congress to
(A) fix with certainty the amount of taxes.
(B) collect the tax levied under the law.
(C) identify who should collect the tax.
(D) determine who should be subject to the tax.
(18) Passive income includes income derived from an activity in which the earner does
not have any substantial participation. This type of income is
(C) No. Aplets is a non-resident foreign corporation not engaged in trade or

business in the Philippines.
(A) usually subject to a final tax.
(D) Yes. Aplets is doing business in the Philippines through its exclusive
distributor Kim's Trading. Inc.
(C) taxable only if earned by a citizen.
(15) In 2009, Spratz, Inc.s net profit before tax was P35 million while its operating
expenses was P31 million. In 2010, its net profit before tax was P40 million and its
operating expenses was P38 million. It did not declare dividends for 2009 and 2010. And
(B) exempt from income taxation.

(D) included in the income tax return.
(19) In 2010, Juliet Ulbod earned P500,000.00 as income from her beauty parlor and
received P250,000.00 as Christmas gift from her spinster aunt. She had no other receipts
for the year. She spent P150,000.00 for the operation of her beauty parlor. For tax
purposes, her gross income for 2010 is
(B) it simultaneously seeks BIR approval of its new accounting period.
(A) P750,000.00.
(C) it should change its accounting period two years prior to changing its taxable
year.
(B) P500,000.00.
(D) its constitution and by-laws authorizes the change.
(C) P350,000.00.
(D) P600,000.00.
(20) Exempted from donors taxation are gifts made
(A) for the use of the barangay.
(B) in consideration of marriage.
(C) to a school which is a stock corporation.
(D) to a for-profit government corporation.
(24) What is the rule on the taxability of income that a government educational institution
derives from its school operations? Such income is
(A) subject to 10% tax on its net taxable income as if it is a proprietary
educational institution.
(B) Exempt from income taxation if it is actually, directly, and exclusively used
for educational purposes.
(C) subject to the ordinary income tax rates with respect to incomes derived from
educational activities.
(21) Federico, a Filipino citizen, migrated to the United States some six years ago and got
a permanent resident status or green card. He should pay his Philippine income taxes on
(D) Exempt from income taxation in the same manner as government-owned and
controlled corporations.
(A) the gains derived from the sale in California, U.S.A. of jewelry he purchased
in the Philippines.
(25) Which among the following reduces the gross estate (not the net estate) of a citizen of
the Philippines for purposes of estate taxation?
(B) the proceeds he received from a Philippine insurance company as the sole
beneficiary of life insurance taken by his father who died recently.
(A) Transfers for public use
(C) the gains derived from the sale in the New York Stock Exchange of shares of
stock in PLDT, a Philippine corporation.
(C) Standard deduction of P1 million
(D) dividends received from a two year old foreign corporation whose gross
income was derived solely from Philippine sources.
(22) An example of a tax where the concept of progressivity finds application is the
(A) income tax on individuals.
(B) excise tax on petroleum products.
(C) value-added tax on certain articles.
(D) amusement tax on boxing exhibitions.
(23) A corporation may change its taxable year to calendar or fiscal year in filing its
annual income tax return, provided
(A) it seeks prior BIR approval of its proposed change in accounting period.
(B) Property previously taxed

(D) Capital of the surviving spouse
(26) Ka Pedring Matibag, a sole proprietor, buys and sells "kumot at kulambo" both of
which are subject to value-added tax. Since he is using the calendar year as his taxable
year, his taxable quarters end on the last day of March, June, September, and December.
When should Ka Pedring file the VAT quarterly return for his gross sales or receipts for
the period of June 1 to September 30?
(A) Within 25 days from September 30
(B) Within 45 days from September 30
(C) Within 15 days from September 30
(D) Within 30 days from September 30
(27) In January 2011, the BIR issued a ruling that Clemen's vodka imports were not
subject to increased excise tax based on his claim that his net retail price was only P200
per 750 milliliter bottle. This ruling was applied to his imports for May, June, and July
2011. In September 2011, the BIR revoked its ruling and assessed him for deficiency taxes
respecting his May, June and July 2011 vodka imports because it discovered that his net
retail price for the vodka was P250 per bottle from January to September 2011. Does the
retroactive application of the revocation violate Clemen's right to due process as a
taxpayer?
(A) Yes, since the presumption is that the BIR ascertained the facts before it made
its ruling.
(B) No, because he acted in bad faith when he claimed a lower net retail price
than what he actually used.
(C) No, since he could avail of remedies available for disputing the assessment.
(D) Yes, since he had already acquired a vested right in the favorable BIR ruling.
(28) Don Fortunato, a widower, died in May, 2011. In his will, he left his estate of P100
million to his four children. He named his compadre, Don Epitacio, to be the administrator
of the estate. When the BIR sent a demand letter to Don Epitacio for the payment of the
estate tax, he refused to pay claiming that he did not benefit from the estate, he not being
an heir. Forthwith, he resigned as administrator. As a result of the resignation, who may be
held liable for the payment of the estate tax?
(A) Don Epitacio since the tax became due prior to his resignation.
(B) The eldest child who would be reimbursed by the others.
(C) All the four children, the tax to be divided equally among them.
(D) The person designated by the will as the one liable.
(29) On July 31, 2011, Esperanza received a preliminary assessment notice from the BIR
demanding that she pays P180,000.00 deficiency income taxes on her 2009 income. How
many days from July 31, 2011 should Esperanza respond to the notice?
(B) the amount of the tax involved does not exceed P100.00.
(C) the corporate taxpayer has no other uncollected tax liability.
(D) the taxpayer is an individual compensation income earner.
(31) Alain Descartes, a French citizen permanently residing in the Philippines, received
several items during the taxable year. Which among the following is NOT subject to
Philippine income taxation?
(A) Consultancy fees received for designing a computer program and installing
the same in the Shanghai facility of a Chinese firm.
(B) Interests from his deposits in a local bank of foreign currency earned abroad
converted to Philippine pesos.
(C) Dividends received from an American corporation which derived 60% of its
annual gross receipts from Philippine sources for the past 7 years.
(D) Gains derived from the sale of his condominium unit located in The Fort,
Taguig City to another resident alien.
(32) Income is considered realized for tax purposes when
(A) it is recognized as revenue under accounting standards even if the law does
not do so.
(B) the taxpayer retires from the business without approval from the BIR.
(C) the taxpayer has been paid and has received in cash or near cash the taxable
income.
(D) the earning process is complete or virtually complete and an exchange has
taken place.
(33) Which among the following circumstances negates the prima facie presumption of
correctness of a BIR assessment?
(A) 180 days.
(A) The BIR assessment was seasonably protested within 30 days from receipt.
(B) 30 days.
(B) No preliminary assessment notice was issued prior to the assessment notice.
(C) 60 days.
(C) Proof that the assessment is utterly without foundation, arbitrary, and
capricious.
(D) 15 days.
(30) The BIR could not avail itself of the remedy of levy and distraint to implement,
through collection, an assessment that has become final, executory, and demandable where
(A) the subject of the assessment is an income tax.
(D) The BIR did not include a formal letter of demand to pay the alleged
deficiency.
(34) On March 30, 2005 Miguel Foods, Inc. received a notice of assessment and a letter of
demand on its April 15, 2002 final adjustment return from the BIR. Miguel Foods then
filed a request for reinvestigation together with the requisite supporting documents on
April 25, 2005. On June 2, 2005, the BIR issued a final assessment reducing the amount
of the tax demanded. Since Miguel Foods was satisfied with the reduction, it did not do
anything anymore. On April 15, 2010 the BIR garnished the corporation's bank deposits to
answer for the tax liability. Was the BIR action proper?
(A) Yes. The BIR has 5 years from the filing of the protest within which to collect.
(B) Yes. The BIR has 5 years from the issuance of the final assessment within
which to collect.
(D) None. Its right to appeal to the CTA has prescribed.

(37) Gerardo died on July 31, 2011. His estate tax return should be filed within
(A) six months from filing of the notice of death.
(B) sixty days from the appointment of an administrator.
(C) six months from the time he died on July 31, 2011.
(D) sixty days from the time he died on July 31, 2011.
(38) Income from dealings in property (real, personal, or mixed) is the gain or loss derived
(A) only from the cash sales of property.
(C) No. The taxpayer did not apply for a compromise.
(B) from cash and gratuitous receipts of property.
(D) No. Without the taxpayers prior authority, the BIR action violated the Bank
Deposit Secrecy Law.
(C) from sale and lease of property.
(35) Which among the following taxpayers is required to use only the calendar year for
tax purposes?
(A) Partnership exclusively for the design of government infrastructure projects
considered as practice of civil engineering.
(B) Joint-stock company formed for the purpose of undertaking construction
projects.
(C) Business partnership engaged in energy operations under a service contract
with the government.
(D) Joint account (cuentas en participacion) engaged in the trading of mineral
ores.
(D) only from the sale of property.

(39) In March 2009, Tonette, who is fond of jewelries, bought a diamond ring for
P750,000.00, a bracelet for P250,000.00, a necklace for P500,000.00, and a brooch for
P500,000.00. Tonette derives income from the exercise of her profession as a licensed
CPA. In October 2009, Tonette sold her diamond ring, bracelet, and necklace for only
P1.25 million incurring a loss of P250,000.00. She used the P1.25 million to buy a solo
diamond ring in November 2009 which she sold for P1.5 million in September 2010.
Tonette had no other transaction in jewelry in 2010. Which among the following describes
the tax implications arising from the above transactions?
(A) Tonette may deduct his 2009 loss only from her 2009 professional income.
(B) Tonette may carry over and deduct her 2009 loss only from her 2010 gain.
(36) Spanflex Intl Inc. received a notice of assessment from the BIR. It seasonably filed a
protest with all the necessary supporting documents but the BIR failed to act on the
protest. Thirty days from the lapse of 180 days from the filing of its protest, Spanflex still
has not elevated the matter to the CTA. What remedy, if any, can Spanflex take?
(C) Tonette may carry over and deduct her 2009 loss from her 2010 professional
income as well as from her gain.
(A) It may file a motion to admit appeal if it could prove that its failure to appeal
was due to the negligence of counsel.
(40) Anion, Inc. received a notice of assessment and a letter from the BIR demanding the
payment of P3 million pesos in deficiency income taxes for the taxable year 2008. The
financial statements of the company show that it has been suffering financial reverses
from the year 2009 up to the present. Its asset position shows that it could pay only
P500,000.00 which it offered as a compromise to the BIR. Which among the following
may the BIR require to enable it to enter into a compromise with Anion, Inc.?
(B) It may no longer appeal since there is no BIR decision from which it could
appeal.
(C) It may wait for the final decision of the BIR on his protest and appeal it to the
CTA within 30 days from receipt of such decision.
(D) Tonette may not deduct her 2009 loss from both her 2010 professional income
and her gain.
(A) Anion must show it has faithfully paid taxes before 2009.
(A) is suspended to await the finality of such decision.
(B) Anion must promise to pay its deficiency when financially able.
(B) is suspended given that the CTA can reverse BIR decisions when prejudicial
to the taxpayer.
(C) Anion must waive its right to the secrecy of its bank deposits.
(D) Anion must immediately deposit the P500,000.00 with the BIR.
(41) Real property owned by the national government is exempt from real property
taxation unless the national government
(A) transfers it for the use of a local government unit.
(B) leases the real property to a business establishment.
(C) gratuitously allows its use for educational purposes by a school established for
profit.
(D) sells the property to a government-owned non-profit corporation.
(42) Dondon and Helena were legally separated. They had six minor children, all qualified
to be claimed as additional exemptions for income tax purposes. The court awarded
custody of two of the children to Dondon and three to Helena, with Dondon directed to
provide full financial support for them as well. The court awarded the 6th child to
Dondon's father with Dondon also providing full financial support. Assuming that only
Dondon is gainfully employed while Helena is not, for how many children could Dondon
claim additional exemptions when he files his income tax return?
(A) Six children.
(B) Five children.
(C) Three children.
(D) Two children.
(43) Political campaign contributions are NOT deductible from gross income
(C) is not suspended because only final decisions of the BIR are subject to appeal.
(D) is not suspended since the continued existence of government depends on tax
revenues.
(45) Real property taxes should not disregard increases in the value of real property
occurring over a long period of time. To do otherwise would violate the canon of a sound
tax system referred to as
(A) theoretical justice.
(B) fiscal adequacy.
(C) administrative feasibility.
(D) symbiotic relationship.
(46) The power to tax is the power to destroy. Is this always so?
(A) No. The Executive Branch may decide not to enforce a tax law which it
believes to be confiscatory.
(B) Yes. The tax collectors should enforce a tax law even if it results to the
destruction of the property rights of a taxpayer.
(C) Yes. Tax laws should always be enforced because without taxes the very
existence of the State is endangered.
(D) No. The Supreme Court may nullify a tax law, hence, property rights are not
affected.
(47) Jeopardy assessment is a valid ground to compromise a tax liability
(A) if they are not reported to the Commission on Elections.
(A) involving deficiency income taxes only, but not for other taxes.
(B) if the candidate supported wins the election because of possible corruption.
(B) because of doubt as to the validity of the assessment.
(C) since they do not help earn the income from which they are to be deducted.
(C) if the compromise amount does not exceed 10% of the basic tax.
(D) since such amounts are not considered as income of the candidate to whom
given.
(D) only when there is an approval of the National Evaluation Board.
(44) When a BIR decision affirming an assessment is appealed to the CTA, the BIR's
power to garnish the taxpayer's bank deposits
(48) Zygomite Minerals, Inc., a corporation registered and holding office in Australia, not
operating in the Philippines, may be subject to Philippine income taxation on
(A) gains it derived from sale in Australia of an ore crusher it bought from the
Philippines with the proceeds converted to pesos.
(B) gains it derived from sale in Australia of shares of stock of Philex Mining
Corporation, a Philippine corporation.
(C) dividends earned from investment in a foreign corporation that derived 40%
of its gross income from Philippine sources.
(D) interests derived from its dollar deposits in a Philippine bank under the
Expanded Foreign Currency Deposit System.
(49) As a general rule, within what period must a taxpayer elevate to the Court of Tax
Appeals a denial of his application for refund of income tax overpayment?
(A) Within 30 days from receipt of the Commissioners denial of his application
for refund.
(B) Within 30 days from receipt of the denial which must not exceed 2 years from
payment of income tax.
(C) Within 2 years from payment of the income taxes sought to be refunded.
(D) Within 30 days from receipt of the denial or within two years from payment.
(50) After the province has constructed a barangay road, the Sangguniang Panglalawigan
may impose a special levy upon the lands specifically benefitted by the road up to an
amount not to exceed
(A) 60% of the actual cost of the road without giving any portion to the barangay.
(B) 100% of the actual project cost without giving any portion to the barangay.
(C) 100% of the actual project cost, keeping 60% for the province and giving 40%
to the barangay.
(D) 60% of the actual cost, dividing the same between the province and the
barangay.
(51) Celia donated P110,000.00 to her friend Victoria who was getting married. Celia gave
no other gift during the calendar year. What is the donor's tax implication on Celias
donation?
(A) The P100,000.00 portion of the donation is exempt since given in
consideration of marriage.
(B) A P10,000.00 portion of the donation is exempt being a donation in
consideration of marriage.
(C) Celia shall pay a 30% donor's tax on the P110,000.00 donation.
(D) The P100,000.00 portion of the donation is exempt under the rate schedule for
donor's tax.
(52) Levox Corporation wanted to donate P5 million as prize money for the world
professional billiard championship to be held in the Philippines. Since the Billiard Sports
Confederation of the Philippines does not recognize the event, it was held under the
auspices of the International Professional Billiards Association, Inc. Is Levox subject to
the donor's tax on its donation?
(A) No, so long as the donated money goes directly to the winners and not
through the association.
(B) Yes, since the national sports association for billiards does not sanction the
event.
(C) No, because it is donated as prize for an international competition under the
billiards association.
(D) Yes, but only that part that exceeds the first P100,000.00 of total Levox
donations for the calendar year.
(53) A violation of the tariff and customs laws is the failure to
(A) pay the customs duties and taxes and to comply with the rules on customs
procedures.
(B) pay the customs duties and taxes or to comply with the rules on customs
procedures.
(C) pay the customs duties and taxes.
(D) comply with the rules on customs procedures.
(54) What is the effect on the tax liability of a taxpayer who does not protest an
assessment for deficiency taxes?
(A) The taxpayer may appeal his liability to the CTA since the assessment is a
final decision of the Commissioner on the matter.
(B) The BIR could already enforce the collection of the taxpayer's liability if it
could secure authority from the CTA.
(C) The taxpayer's liability becomes fixed and subject to collection as the
assessment becomes final and collectible.
(D) The taxpayer's liability remains suspended for 180 days from the expiration of
the period to protest.
(55) A non-stock, non-profit school always had cash flow problems, resulting in failure to
recruit well-trained administrative personnel to effectively manage the school. In 2010,
Don Leon donated P100 million pesos to the school, provided the money shall be used
solely for paying the salaries, wages, and benefits of administrative personnel. The
donation represents less than 10% of Don Leon's taxable income for the year. Is he subject
to donor's taxes?
(A) No, since the donation is actually, directly, and exclusively used for
educational purposes.
(B) Yes, because the donation is to be wholly used for administration purposes.
(C) Yes, since he did not obtain the requisite NGO certification before he made
the donation.
(D) No, because the donation does not exceed 10% of his taxable income for
2010.
(56) What is the tax base for the imposition by the province of professional taxes?
(A) That which Congress determined.
(B) The pertinent provision of the local Government Code.
(C) The reasonable classification made by the provincial sanggunian.
(D) That which the Dept. of Interior and Local Government determined.
(57) There is prima facie evidence of a false or fraudulent return where the
(A) tax return was amended after a notice of assessment was issued.
(B) tax return was filed beyond the reglementary period.
(C) taxpayer changed his address without notifying the BIR.
(D) deductions claimed exceed by 30% the actual deductions.
(58) The proceeds received under a life insurance endowment contract is NOT considered
part of gross income
(A) if it is so stated in the life insurance endowment policy.
(B) if the price for the endowment policy was not fully paid.
(C) where payment is made as a result of the death of the insured.
(D) where the beneficiary was not the one who took out the endowment contract.
(59) The excess of allowable deductions over gross income of the business in a taxable
year is known as
(A) net operating loss.
(B) ordinary loss.
(C) net deductible loss.
(D) NOLCO.
(60) No action shall be taken by the BIR on the taxpayers disputed issues until the
taxpayer has paid the deficiency taxes
(A) when the assessment was issued against a false and fraudulent return.
(B) if there was a failure to pay the deficiency tax within 60 days from BIR
demand.
(C) if the Regional Trial Court issues a writ of preliminary injunction to enjoin the
BIR.
(D) attributable to the undisputed issues in the assessment notice.
(61) Is an article previously exported from the Philippines subject to the payment of
customs duties?
(A) Yes, because all articles that are imported from any foreign country are
subject to duty.
(B) No, because there is no basis for imposing duties on articles previously
exported from the Philippines.
(C) Yes, because exemptions are strictly construed against the importer who is the
taxpayer.
(D) No, if it is covered by a certificate of identification and has not been improved
in value.
(62) Prior to the enactment of the Local Government Code, consumer's cooperatives
registered under the Cooperative Development Act enjoyed exemption from all taxes
imposed by a local government. With the Local Government Codes withdrawal of
exemptions, could these cooperatives continue to enjoy such exemption?
(A) Yes, because the Local Government Code, a general law, could not amend a
special law such as the Cooperative Development Act.
(B) No, Congress has not by the majority vote of all its members granted
exemption to consumers' cooperatives.
(C) No, the exemption has been withdrawn to level the playing field for all
taxpayers and preserve the LGUs' financial position.
(D) Yes, their exemption is specifically mentioned among those not withdrawn by
the Local Government Code.
(63) Under the Tariff and Customs Code, abandoned imported articles becomes the
property of the
(B) a non-resident alien engaged in trade or business in the Philippines.

(C) a resident alien not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines.
(D) a resident alien engaged in trade or business in the Philippines.
(66) Lualhati Educational Foundation, Inc., a stock educational institution organized for
profit, decided to lease for commercial use a 1,500 sq. m. portion of its school. The school
actually, directly, and exclusively used the rents for the maintenance of its school
buildings, including payment of janitorial services. Is the leased portion subject to real
property tax?
(A) government whatever be the circumstances.
(A) Yes, since Lualhati is a stock and for profit educational institution.
(B) insurance company that covered the shipment.
(B) No, since the school actually, directly, and exclusively used the rents for
(C) shipping company in case the freight was not paid.

(D) bank if the shipment is covered by a letter of credit.
(64) Ka Tato owns a parcel of land in San Jose, Batangas declared for real property
taxation, as agricultural. In 1990, he used the land for a poultry feed processing plant but
continued to declare the property as agricultural. In March 2011, the local tax assessor
discovered Ka Tatos change of use of his land and informed the local treasurer who
demanded payment of deficiency real property taxes from 1990 to 2011. Has the action
prescribed?
(A) No, the deficiency taxes may be collected within five years from when they
fell due.
(B) No. The deficiency taxes for the period 1990 up to 2011 may still be collected
within 10 years from March 2011.
(C) Yes. More than 10 years had lapsed for the period 1990 up to 2000, hence the
right to collect the deficiency taxes has prescribed.
(D) Yes. More than 5 years had lapsed for the collection of the deficiency taxes
for the period 1990 up to 2005.
(65) Pierre de Savigny, a Frenchman, arrived in the Philippines on January 1, 2010 and
continued to live and engage in business in the Philippines. He went on a tour of Southeast
Asia from August 1 to November 5, 2010. He returned to the Philippines on November 6,
2010 and stayed until April 15, 2011 when he returned to France. He earned during his
stay in the Philippines a gross income of P3 million from his investments in the country.
For the year 2010, Pierres taxable status is that of
(A) a non-resident alien not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines.
(C) No, but it may be subject to income taxation on the rents it receives.
(D) Yes, since the leased portion is not actually, directly, and exclusively used for
(67) Apparently the law does not provide for the refund of real property taxes that have
been collected as a result of an erroneous or illegal assessment by the provincial or city
assessor. What should be done in such instance to avoid an injustice?
(A) Question the legality of the no-refund rule before the Supreme Court.
(B) Enact a new ordinance amending the erroneous or illegal assessment to
correct the error.
(C) Subsequent adjustment in tax computation and the application of the excess
payment to future real property tax liabilities.
(D) Pass a new ordinance providing for the refund of real property taxes that have
been erroneously or illegally collected.
(68) What should the BIR do when the prescriptive period for the assessment of a tax
deficiency is about to prescribe but the taxpayer has not yet complied with the BIR
requirements for the production of books of accounts and other records to substantiate the
claimed deductions, exemptions or credits?
(A) Call the taxpayer to a conference to explain the delay.
(B) Immediately conduct an investigation of the taxpayer's activities.
(C) Issue a jeopardy assessment coupled with a letter of demand.
(D) Issue a notice of constructive distraint to protect government interest.
(69) Money collected from taxation shall not be paid to any religious dignitary EXCEPT
when
(73) Which among the following concepts of taxation is the basis for the situs of income
taxation?
(A) Lifeblood doctrine of taxation
(A) the religious dignitary is assigned to the Philippine Army.
(B) Symbiotic relation in taxation
(B) it is paid by a local government unit.
(C) Compensatory purpose of taxation
(C) the payment is passed in audit by the COA.
(D) Sumptuary purpose of taxation
(D) it is part of a lawmakers pork barrel.

(A) wholly manufactured in the discriminating country but carried by vessels of
another country.
(74) In "Operation Kandado," the BIR temporarily closed business establishments,

including New Dynasty Corporation that failed to comply with VAT regulations. New
Dynasty contends that it should not be temporarily closed since it has a valid and existing
VAT registration, it faithfully issued VAT receipts, and filed the proper VAT returns. The
contention may be rejected if the BIR investigation reveals that
(B) not manufactured in the discriminating country but carried by vessels of such
country.
(A) the taxpayer has not been regularly filing its income tax returns for the past 4
years.
(C) partly manufactured in the discriminating country but carried by vessels of

another country.
(B) the taxpayer deliberately filed a false and fraudulent return with deliberate
intention to evade taxes.
(D) not manufactured in the discriminating country and carried by vessels of

another country.
(C) the taxpayer used falsified documents to support its application for refund of
taxes.
(71) The taxpayer seasonably filed his protest together with all the supporting documents.
It is already July 31, 2011, or 180 days from submission of the protest but the BIR
Commissioner has not yet decided his protest. Desirous of an early resolution of his
protested assessment, the taxpayer should file his appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals not
later than
(D) there was an understatement of taxable sales or receipts by 30% or more for
the taxable quarter.
(70) Discriminatory duties may NOT be imposed upon articles
(A) August 31, 2011.
(75) The head priest of the religious sect Tres Personas Solo Dios, as the corporation sole,
rented out a 5,000 sq. m. lot registered in its name for use as school site of a school
organized for profit. The sect used the rentals for the support and upkeep of its priests. The
rented lot is
(B) August 30, 2011.
(A) not exempt from real property taxes because the user is organized for profit.
(C) August 15, 2011.
(B) exempt from real property taxes since it is actually, directly, and exclusively
used for religious purposes.
(D) August 1, 2011.
(C) not exempt from real property taxes since it is the rents, not the land, that is
used for religious purposes.
(72) Which of the following are NOT usually imposed when there is a tax amnesty?
(A) Civil, criminal, and administrative penalties
(D) exempt from real property taxes since it is actually, directly, and exclusively
used for educational purposes.
(B) Civil and criminal penalties

(C) Civil and administrative penalties
(D) Criminal and administrative penalties
2012
1. Bank A deposit money with Bank B which earns interest that is subjected to the 20%
final withholding tax. At the same time, Bank A is subjected to the 5% gross receipts tax
on its interest income on loan transactions to customers. Which statement
below INCORRECTLY describes the transaction?
a) There is double taxation because two taxes income tax and gross receipts tax
are imposed on the interest incomes described above and double taxation is
prohibited under the 1987 Constitution
b) There is no double taxation because the first tax is income tax, while the second
tax is business tax;
c) There is no double taxation because the income tax is on the interest income of
Bank A on its deposits with Bank B (passive income), while the gross receipts tax
is on the interest income received by Bank A from loans to its debtor-customers
(active income);
d) Income tax on interest income of deposits of Bank A is a direct tax, while GRT
on interest income on loan transaction is an tax.
2. Which of the following statement is NOT correct?
a) In case of doubt, statutes levying taxes are constructed strictly the government;
b) The construction of a statute made by his predecessors is not binding upon the
successor, if thereafter he becomes satisfied that a different construction should be
given;
c) The reversal of a ruling shall not generally be given retroactive application, if
said reversal will be prejudicial to the taxpayer;
d) A memorandum circular promulgated by the CIR that imposes penalty for
violations of certain rules need not be published in a newspaper of general
circulation or official gazette because it has the force and effect of law.
3. Which statement below expresses the lifeblood theory?
d) The power of taxation is an inherent power of the sovereign to impose burdens

upon subjects and objects within its jurisdiction for the purpose of raising
revenues.
4. Which statement is WRONG?
a) The power of taxation may be exercised by the government, its political
subdivisions, and public utilities;
b) Generally, there is no limit on the amount of tax that may be imposed;
c) The money contributed as tax becomes part of the public funds;
d) The power of tax is subject to certain constitutional limitations.
5. The Philippines adopted the semi-global tax system, which means that:
a) All taxable incomes, regardless of the nature of income, are added together to
arrive at gross income, and all allowable deductions are deducted from the gross
income to arrive at the taxable income;
b) All incomes subject to final withholding taxes liable to income tax under the
schedular tax system, while all ordinary income as well as income not subject to
final withholding tax under the global tax system;
c) All taxable incomes are subject to final withholding taxes under the schedular
tax system;
d) All taxable incomes from sources within and without the Philippines are liable
to income tax.
6. Income from the performance of services is treated as income from within the
Philippines, if:
a) The payment of compensation for the service is made in the Philippines;
b) The contract calling for the performance of services is signed in the
Philippines;
a) The assessed taxes must be enforced by the government.
c) The service is actually performed in the Philippines;
b) The underlying basis of taxation is government necessity, for without taxation,

a government can neither exist nor endure;
d) The recipient of service income is a resident of the Philippines.
c) Taxation is an arbitrary method of exaction by those who are in the seat of

power;
7. For income tax purposes, the source of the service income is important for the taxpayer,
who is a:
a) Filipino citizen residing in Makati City;
b) Non-resident Filipino citizen working residing in London, United Kingdom;
c) Japanese citizen who is married to a Filipino citizen and residing in their family
home located Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City;
b) 6% capital gains tax on the gross selling price of fair market value, whichever
is higher;
d) Domestic corporation.
c) Ordinary income tax at the graduated rates of 5% to 32% of net taxable income;
8. Interest income of a domestic commercial bank derived from a peso loan to a domestic
corporation in 2010 is :
a) Subject to the 30% income tax based on its net taxable income;
b) Subject to the 20% final withholding tax;
c) Subject to the 7.5% final withholding tax;
d) Subject to 10% final withholding tax.
9. A resident corporation is one that is:
d) 30% income tax on net taxable income.

12. During the audit conducted by the BIR official, it was found that the rental income
claimed by the corporation was not subjected to expanded withholding tax. Accordingly,
the claimed rental expense:
a) Is deductible from the gross income of the corporation, despite nonwithholding of income tax by the corporation;
b) Is deductible from the gross income of the corporation, provided that the 5%
expanded withholding tax is paid by the corporation during the audit;
a) Organized under the laws of the Philippines that does business in another
country;
c) Is not deductible from gross income of the corporation due to non-withholding

of tax;
b) Organized under the laws of a foreign country that sets up a regional

headquarter in the Philippines doing product promotion and information
dissemination;
d) Is deductible, if it can be shown that the lessor has correctly reported the rental
income in his tax return.
c) Organized under the laws of the Philippines that engages business in a special
economic zone;
d) Organized under the laws of a foreign country that engages in business in
Makati City, Pihlippines.
10. A dealer in securities sold unlisted shares of stocks of a domestic corporation in 2010
and derived a gain of P1 Million therefrom. The gain is:
a) Taxable at 30% regular corporate income tax based on net taxable income;
b) Taxable at 5%/10% capital gains tax based on net capital gain;
c) Taxable at of 1% stock transaction tax based on the gross selling price or fair
market value, whichever is higher
d) Exempt from income tax
11. An individual, who is a real estate dealer, sold a residential lot in Quezon City at a gain
of P100,000.00 (selling price of P900,000.00 and cost is P800,00.00). The sale is subject
to income tax as follows:
a) 6% capital gains tax on the gain;
13. A resident Filipino citizen (not a dealer in securities) sold shares of stocks of a
domestic corporation that are listed and traded in the Philippine Stock Exchange.
a) The sale is exempt from income tax but subject to the of 1% stock
transaction tax;
b) The sale is subject to income tax computed at the graduated income tax rates of
5% to 32% on net taxable income;
c) The sale is subject to the stock transaction tax and income tax;
d) The sale is both exempt from the stock transaction tax and income tax.
14. The appropriate method of accounting for a contractor on his long-term construction
contract (i.e., it takes more than a year to finish) is:
a) Cash method;
b) Accrual method;
c) Installment sale method;
d) Percentage of completion method.
15. A general professional partnership (GPP) is one:
a) That is registered as such with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the Bureau of Internal Revenue;
b) That is composed of individuals who exercise a common profession;
c) That exclusively derives income from the practice of the common profession;
d) That derives professional income and rental income from property owned by it.
16. The interest expense of a domestic corporation on a bank loan in connection with the
purchase of a production equipment:
a) Is not deductible from gross income of the borrower-corporation;
b) Is deductible from the gross income of the borrower-corporation during the
year or it may be capitalized as part of cost of the equipment;
c) Is deductible only for a period of five years from date of purchase;
d) Is deductible only if the taxpayer uses the cash method of accounting.
17. The "all events test" refers to:
19. Which statement is correct? A non-stock, non-profit charitable association that sells its
idle agricultural property is:
a) Not required to file an income tax return nor pay income tax on the transaction
to the BIR, provided the sales proceeds are invested in another real estate during
the year;
b) Required to pay the 6% capital gains tax on the gross selling price of fair
market value, whichever is higher;
c) Mandated to pay the 30% regular corporate income tax on the gain from sale;
d) Required to withhold the applicable expanded withholding tax rate on the
transaction and remit the same to the BIR.
20. ABS Corporation is a PEZA-registered export enterprise which manufactures cameras
and sells all its finished products abroad. Which statement is NOT correct?
a) ABS Corporation is subject to the 5% final tax on gross income earned, in lieu
of all national and local taxes;
a) A person who uses the cash method where all sales have been fully paid by the
buyers thereof;
b) ABS Corporation is exempt from the 30% corporate income tax on net income,
provided it pays value added tax;
b) A person who uses the installment sales method, where the full amount of
consideration is paid in full by the buyer thereof within the year of sale;
c) ABS Corporation is subject to the 30% corporate income tax on net income;
c) A person who uses the accrual method, whereby an expense is deductible for
the taxable year in which all the events had occurred which determined the fact of
the liability and the amount thereof could be determined with reasonable
accuracy;
d) A person who uses the completed method, whereby the construction project has
been completed during the year the contract was signed.
18. All the items below are excluded from gross income, except:
a) Gain from sale of long-term bonds, debentures and indebtedness;
b) Value of property received by a person as donation or inheritance;
c) Retirement benefits received from the GSIS, SSS, or accredited retirement
plan;
d) Separation pay received by a retiring employee under a voluntary retirement
program of the corporate employer.
d) ABS Corporation is exempt from all national and local taxes, except real
property tax.
21. In May 2010, Mr. And Mrs. Melencio Antonio donated a house and lot with a fair
market value of P10 Million to their sob, Roberto, who is to be married during the same
year to Josefina Angeles. Which statement below isINCORRECT?
a) There are four (4) donations made two (2) donations are made by Mr.
Melencio Antonio to Roberto and Josefina, and two (2) donations are made by
Mrs. Antonio;
b) The four (4) donations are made by the Spouses Antonio to members of the
family, hence, subject to the graduated donors tax rates (2%-15%);
c) Two (2) donations are made by the spouses to members of the family, while
two (2) other donations are made to strangers;
d) Two (2) donations made by the spouses to Roberto are entitled to deduction
from the gross gift as donation proper nuptias.
22. While he was traveling with friends, Mr. Jose Francisco, resident Filipino citizen, died
on January 20, 2011 in a California Hospital, USA, leaving personal and real properties
with market values as follows: House and Lot in Quezon City P10 Million; Cash in bank
in California US$10,000.00; Citibank in New York US$5,000.00; Cash in BPI Makati
P4 Million; Car in Quezon City P1 Million; Shares of stocks of Apple Corporation, US
corporation listed in NY Stock Exchange US$1 = Php50. His gross estate for the
Philippine estate tax purposes shall be:
c) Maria Reyes is exempt from donors tax in 2011 only to the extent of
P50,000.00;
d) Maria Reyes is exempt from donors tax in 2011 because the donee is minor.
25. Jose Ramos, single, died of a heart attack on October 10, 2011, leaving a residential
house and lot with a market value of P1.8 Million and cash of P100,000.00. Funeral
expenses paid amounted to P250,000.00
a) P13 Million;
a) His estate will be exempt from estate tax because the net estate is zero;
b) P14 Million;
b) His estate will be subject to estate tax because net estate is P1,650,000.00;
c) P15 Million;
c) His estate will be subject to estate tax because net estate is P1,700,00.00;
d) P16 Million.
d) His estate will be subject to estate tax because net estate is P800,000.00.
23. In 2006, Mr. Vicente Tagle, a retiree, bought 10,000 CDA shares that are unlisted in
the local stock exchange for P10 per share. In 2010, the said shares had a book value per
share of P60 per share. In view of a car accident in 2010, Mr. Vicente Tagle had to sell his
CDA shares but he could sell the same only for P50 per share. The sale is subject to tax as
follos:
a) 5%/10% capital gains tax on the capital gain from sale of P40 per share (P50
selling price less P10 cost);
b) 5%/10% capital gains tax on the capital gain of P50 per share, arrived at by
deducting the cost (P10 per share) from the book value (P60 per share);
c) 5%/10% capital gains tax on the capital gain from sale of P40 per share (P50
selling price less P10 cost) plus donors tax on the excess of the fair market value
of the shares over the consideration;
d) Graduated income tax rates of 5% to 32% on the net taxable income from the
sale of the shares.
24. On January 10, 2011, Maria Reyes, single-mother, donated cash in the amount of
P50,000.00 to her daughter Cristina, and on December 20, 2011, she donated another
P50,000.00 to Cristina. Which statement is correct?
a) Maria Reyes is subject to donors tax in 2011 because gross gift is
P100,000.00;
b) Maria Reyes is exempt from donors tax in 2011 because gross gift is
P100,000.00;
26. Sale of residential house and lot by an official of a domestic corporation to another
official in the same corporation for a consideration of P2.5 Million in 2011 is:
a) Exempt from VAT because the gross sales do not exceed P2.5 Million;
b) Exempt from VAT because the property sold is a capital asset, regardless of the
gross selling price;
c) Exempt from VAT because the seller is not a person engaged in real estate
business;
d) Taxable at 12% VAT output tax on the gross selling price of P2.5 Million.
27. An importer of flowers from abroad in 2011:
a) Is liable for VAT, if it registers as a VAT person;
b) Is exempt from VAT, because the goods are treated as agricultural products;
c) Is exempt from VAT, provided that his total importation of flowers does not
exceed P1.5 Million;
d) Is liable for VAT, despite the fact that it did not register as a VAT person and its
total annual sales of flowers do not exceed P1.5 Million.
28. A VAT-registered contractor performed services for his customer in 2010 and billed
him P11.2 Million, broken down as follows: P10 Million cost of services, plus P1.2
Million, 12% VAT. Of the contract price of P10 Million, only P8 Million plus VAT thereon
was received from the customer in 2010, and the balance of P4 Million plus VAT was
received by the contractor in 2011. How much is the taxable gross receipts of the
contractor for 2010, for VAT purposes?
a) P10 Million, the total cost of services performed in 2010;
b) P8 Million, the amount received from the customer in 2010;
c) P8 Million plus VAT received from the customer in 2010;
d) P11.2 Million, the total cost of services performed plus 12% VAT.
29. MBM Corporation is the owner-operator of movie houses in Cavite. During the year
2010, it received a total gross receipts of P20 Million from the operation of movies. It did
not register as a VAT person. Which statement below is correct?
a) MBM Corporation is exempt from the 12% VAT, but liable for the 20%
amusement tax on admissions under the Local Government Code;
b) MBM Corporation is both liable for the 12% VAT and 20% amusement tax on
admissions;
c) MBM Corporation is both exempt from the 12% VAT and 20% amusement tax
on admissions;
d) MBM Corporation is liable for the 12% VAT, but exempt from the 20%
amusement tax on admissions.
30. A pawnshop shall now be treated, for business tax purposes:
a) As a lending investor liable to the 12% VAT on its gross receipts from interest
income and from gross selling price from sale of unclaimed properties;
b) Not as a lending investor, but liable to the 5% gross receipts tax imposed on a
non-bank financial intermediary under Title VI (Other Percentage Taxes);
c) As exempt from 12% VAT and 5% gross receipts tax;
d) As liable to the 12% VAT and 5% gross receipts tax.
31. Under the VAT system, there is no cascading because the tax itself is not again being
taxed. However, in determining the tax base on sale of taxable goods under the VAT
system:
a) The professional tax paid by the professional is included in gross receipts;
b) The other percentage tax (e.g., gross receipts tax) paid by the taxpayer is
included in gross selling price;
c) The excise tax paid by the taxpayer before withdrawal of the goods from the
place of production or from customs custody is included in the gross selling price;
d) The documentary stamp tax paid by the taxpayer is included in the gross selling
price or gross receipts.
32. Except for one transaction, the rest are exempt from value added tax. Which one is
VAT taxable?
a) Sales of chicken by a restaurant owner who did not register as a VAT person
and whose gross annual sales is P1.2 Million;
b) Sales of copra by a copra dealer to a coconut oil manufacturer who did not
register as a VAT person and whose gross annual sales is P5 Million;
c) Gross receipts of CPA during the year amounted to P1 Million; the CPA
registered as a VAT person in January 2011, before practicing his profession;
d) Sales of a book store during the year amounted to P10 Million; it did not
register as a VAT person with the BIR.
33. A lessor or real property is exempt from value added tax in one of the transactions
below. Which one is it?
a) Lessor leases commercial stalls located in the Greenhills Commercial Center to
VAT-registered sellers of cell phones; lessors gross rental during the year
amounted to P12 Million;
b) Lessor leases residential apartment units to individual tenants for P10,000.00
per month per unit; his gross rental income during the year amounted to P2
Million;
c) Lessor leases commercial stalls at P10,000.00 per stall per month and
residential units at P15,000.00 per unit per month; his gross rental income during
the year amounted to P3 Million;
d) Lessor leases two (2) residential houses and lots at P50,000.00 per month per
unit, but he registered as a VAT person.
34. IBP Bank extended loans to debtors during the year, with real properties of the debtors
being used as collateral to secure the loans. When the debtors failed to pay the unpaid
principal and interests after several demand letters, the bank foreclosed the same and
entered into contracts of lease with tenants. The bank is subject to the tax as follows:
a) 12% VAT on the rental income, but exempt from the 7% gross receipts tax;
b) 7% gross receipts tax on the rental income, but exempt from VAT;
c) Liable to both the 12% VAT and 7% gross receipts tax;
d) Exempt from both the 12% VAT and 7% gross receipts tax.
35. Which transaction below is subject to VAT?
a) Sale of vegetables by a farmer in Baguio City to a vegetable dealer;
b) Sale of vegetables by a vegetable dealer in Baguio City to another vegetable
dealer in Quezon City;
c) Sale of vegetables by the QC vegetable dealer to a restaurant in Manila;
d) Sale of vegetables by the restaurant operator to its customers.
36. Which importation in 2011 is subject to VAT?
a) Importation of fuels by a person engaged in international shipping worth P20
Million;
b) Importation of raw, unprocessed, refrigerated Kobe beef from Japan by a beef
dealer for sale to hotels in Makati City with a fair market value of P10 Million;
c) Importation of wines by a wine dealer with a fair market value of P2 million for
sale to hotels in Makati City;
d) Importation of books worth P5 Million and school supplies worth P1.2 million.
37. Input tax is available to a VAT-registered buyer, provided that:
a) The seller is a VAT-registered person;
b) The seller issues a VAT invoice or official receipt, which separately indicates
the VAT component;
c) The goods or service is subject to or exempt from VAT, but the sale is covered
by a VAT invoice or receipt issued by VAT-registered person;
d) The name and TIN of the buyer is not stated or shown in the VAT invoice or
receipt
Which statement shown above is NOT correct?
38. Claim for tax credit or refund of excess input tax is available only to:
a) A VAT-registered person whose sales are made to embassies of foreign
governments and United Nations agencies located in the Philippines without the
BIR approval of the application for zero-rating;
b) Any person who has excess input tax arising from local purchases of taxable
goods and services;
c) A VAT-registered person whose sales are made to clients in the Philippines;

d) A VAT-registered person whose sales are made to customers outside the
Philippines and who issued VAT invoices or receipts with the words "ZERO
RATED SALES" imprinted on the sales invoices or receipts.
39. A hotel operator that is a VAT-registered person and who leases luxury vehicles to its
hotel customers is:
a) Subject to the 3% common carriers tax and 12% VAT;
b) Subject to the 3% common carriers tax only;
c) Subject to the 12% VAT only;
d) Exempt from both the 3% common carriers tax and 12% VAT.
40. Which statement is correct? A bar review center owned and operated by lawyers is:
a) Exempt from VAT, regardless of its gross receipts during the year because it is
an educational center;
b) Exempt from VAT, provided that its annual gross receipts do not exceed P1.5
Million in 2011;
c) Subject to VAT, regardless of its gross receipts during the year;
d) Subject to VAT, if it is duly accredited by TESDA.
41. For 2012, input tax is not available as a credit against the output tax of the buyer of
taxable goods or services during the quarter, if:
a) The VAT invoice or receipt of the seller is registered with the BIR;
b) The VAT invoice or receipt of the seller does not separately indicate the gross
selling price or gross receipts and the VAT component therein;
c) The VAT invoice or receipt is issued in the name of the VAT-registered buyer
and his TIN is shown in said invoice or receipt;
d) The VAT invoice or receipt issued by the seller shows the Taxpayer
Identification Number plus the word "VAT" or "VAT registered person".
42. The public market vendor below, who is not a VAT-registered person is liable to VAT
in 2010, if:
a) She sells raw chicken and meats and her gross sales during the year is P2
Million;
b) She sells vegetables and fruits in her stall and her gross sales during the year is
P1 Million;
c) File an appeal to the Secretary of Finance within thirty (30) days from receipt
thereof;
c) She sells canned goods, processed coconut oils, and cut flowers in her stall and
her gross sales during the year is P2.5 Million;
d) File an appeal to the Secretary of Justice within thirty (30) days from receipt
thereof.
d) She sells live fish, shrimps, and crabs and her gross sales during the year is P5
Million.
46. On April 15, 2011, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue mailed by registered mail
the final assessment notice and the demand letter covering the calendar year 2007 with the
QC Post Office. Which statement is correct?
43. Which statement is FALSE under the VAT law?

a) A VAT-registered person will be subject to VAT for his taxable transactions,
regardless of his gross sales or receipts;
b) A person engaged in trade or business selling taxable goods or services must
register as a VAT person, when his gross sales or receipts for the year 2011 exceed
P1.5 Million;
c) A person who issued a VAT-registered invoice or receipt for a VAT-exempt
transaction is liable to the 12% VAT as a penalty for the wrong issuance thereof;
d) Once a doctor of medicine exercises his profession during the year, he needs to
register as a VAT person and to issue VAT receipts for professional fees received.
44. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue may NOT inquire into the bank deposits of a
taxpayer, except:
a) When the taxpayer files a fraudulent return;
b) When the taxpayer offers to compromise the assessed tax based on erroneous
assessment;
c) When the taxpayer offers to compromise the assessed tax based on financial
incapacity to pay and he authorizes the Commissioner in writing to look into his
bank records;
d) When the taxpayer did not file his income tax return for the year.
45. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue issued a BIR ruling to the effect that the
transaction is liable to income tax and value added tax. Upon receipt of the ruling, a
taxpayer does not agree thereto. What is his proper remedy?
a) File a petition for review with the Court of Tax Appeals within thirty (30) days
from receipt thereof;
b) File a motion for reconsideration with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue;
a) The assessment notice is void because it was mailed beyond the prescriptive
period;
b) The assessment notice is void because it was not received by the taxpayer
within the three-year period from the date of filing of the tax return;
c) The assessment notice is void if the taxpayer can show that the same was
received only after one (1) month from date of mailing;
d) The assessment notice is valid even if the taxpayer received the same after the
three-year period from the date of filing of the tax return.
47. A preliminary Assessment Notice (PAN) is NOT required to be issued by the BIR
before issuing a Final Assessment Notice (FAN) on one of the following cases:
a) When a taxpayer does not pay the 2010 deficiency income tax liability on or
before July 15 of the year;
b) When the finding for any deficiency tax is the result of mathematical error in
the computation of the tax as appearing on the face of the return;
c) When a discrepancy has been determined between the value added tax paid and
the amount due for the year;
d) When the amount of discrepancy shown in the Letter Notice is not paid within
thirty (30) days from date of receipt.
48. When a protest against the deficiency income tax assessment was denied by the BIR
Regional Director of Quezon City, the appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals must be filed by
a taxpayer:
a) If the amount of basic tax assessed is P100,000.00 or more;
b) If the amount of basic tax assessed is P300,000.00 or more;
c) If the amount of basic tax assessed is P500,000.00 or more;
d) If the amount of basic tax assessed is P1 Million or more;
49. The taxpayer received an assessment notice on April 15, 2011 and filed its request for
reinvestigation against the assessment on April 30, 2011. Additional documentary
evidence in support of its protest was submitted by it on June 30, 2011. If no denial of the
protest was received by the taxpayer, when is the last day for the filing of its appeal to the
CTA?
a) November 30, 2011;
b) December 30, 2011;
c) January 30, 2012;
d) February 28, 2012.
50. Using the same facts in the immediately preceding number, but assuming that the final
decision on the disputed assessment was received by the taxpayer on July 30, 2011, when
is the last day for filing of the appeal to the CTA?
a) August 30, 2011;
b) September 30, 2011;
c) December 30, 2011;
d) January 30, 2012.
51. Which court has jurisdiction to determine if the warrant of distraint and levy issued by
the BIR is valid and to rule if the waiver of the Statute of Limitations was validly
effected?
a) City Courts;
b) Regional Trial Court;
53. In case of full or partial denial of the written claim for refund or excess input tax
directly attributable to zero-rated sales, or the failure on the part of the Commissioner to
act on the application within 120 days from the date of submission of complete
documents, an appeal must be filed with the CTA:
a) Within thirty (30) days after filing the administrative claim with the BIR;
b) Within sixty (60) days after filing the administrative claim with the BIR;
c) Within one hundred twenty (120) days after filing the administrative claim with
the BIR;
d) Within thirty (30) days from the receipt of the decision denying the claim or
after the expiration of the 120-day period.
54. The submission of the required documents within sixty (60) days from the filing of the
protest is available only where:
a) The taxpayer previously filed a Motion for Reconsideration with the BIR
official;
b) The taxpayer previously filed a request for reconsideration with the BIR
official;
c) The taxpayer previously filed a request for reinvestigation with the BIR
official;
d) The taxpayer previously filed an extension to file a protest with the BIR
official.
55. The prescriptive period for the collection of the deficiency tax assessment will be
tolled:
c) Court of Tax Appeals;
a) If the taxpayer files a request for reconsideration with the Asst. Commissioner;
d) Court of Appeals.
b) If the taxpayer files a request for reinvestigation that is approved by the

Commissioner of Internal Revenue;
52. Which statement below on compromise of tax liability is correct?

a) Compromise of a tax liability is available only at the administrative level;
b) Compromise of a tax liability is available only before trial at the CTA;
c) Compromise of a tax liability is available even during appeal, provided that
prior leave of court is obtained;
d) Compromise of a tax liability is still available even after the court decision has
become final and executory.
c) If the taxpayer changes his address in the Philippines that is communicated to

the BIR official;
d) If a warrant of levy is served upon the taxpayers real property in Manila.
56. Which statement is correct? The collection of a deficiency tax assessment by distraint
and levy:
a) May be repeated, if necessary, until the full amount due, including all expenses,
is collected;
b) Must be done successively, first by distraint and then by levy;
c) Automatically covers the bank deposits of a delinquent taxpayer;
d) May be done only once during the taxable year.
57. The prescriptive period to file a criminal action is:
a) Ten (10) years from the date of discovery of the commission of fraud or nonfiling of tax return;
b) Five (5) years from the date of issuance of the final assessment notice;
c) Three (3) years from the filing of the annual tax return;
d) Five (5) years from the commission of the violation of the law, and if the same
be not known at the time, from the discovery thereof and the institution of judicial
proceedings for its investigation and punishment.
58. The accuseds mere reliance on the representations made by his accountant, with
deliberate refusal or avoidance to verify the contents of his tax return and to inquire on its
authenticity constitutes:
a) Simple negligence;
b) Gross negligence;
overpaid amount in 2008. Can the refund be allowed or not, and if disallowed, does X
Corporation lose the claimed amount?
a) X Corporation may not get the refund because the decision to carry over in
2008 was irrevocable for that year, and it may not change that decision in
succeeding years;
b) X Corporation may not get the refund in 2009, but the amount being claimed as
refund may be utilized in succeeding years until fully exhausted because there is
no prescriptive period for carry over of excess income tax payments;
c) X Corporation may get the refund, provided that it will no longer carry over
such amount or utilize the same against its income tax liability in the future;
d) X Corporation may file instead a claim of tax credit, in lieu of refund.
61. Which statement is correct?
a) Legislative acts passed by the municipal council in the exercise of its
lawmaking authority are denominated as resolutions and ordinances;
b) Legislative acts passed by the municipal council in the exercise of its
lawmaking authority are denominated as resolutions;
c) Willful blindness;
c) Legislative acts passed by the municipal council in the exercise of its

lawmaking authority are denominated as ordinances;
d) Excusable negligence.
d) Both ordinances and resolutions are solemn and formal acts.
59. The acquittal of the accused in the criminal action for the failure to file income tax
return and failure to supply correct information will have the following consequence:
62. Which of the following statements is NOT a test of a valid ordinance?

a) It must not contravene the Constitution or any statute;
a) The CTA will automatically exempt the accused from any civil liability;
b) It must not be unfair or oppressive;
b) The CTA will still hold the taxpayer liable for deficiency income tax liability in
all cases, since preponderance of evidence is merely required for tax cases;
c) It must not be partial or discriminatory;
c) The CTA will impose civil or tax liability only if there was a final assessment
notice issued by the BIR against the accused in accordance with the prescribed
procedures for issuing assessments, which was presented during the trial;
d) The CTA will impose civil or tax liability, provided that a computation of the
tax liability is presented during the trial.
60. X Corporation had excess income tax payment for the year 2008, which it chose to
carry over in 2009. In filing its 2009 corporate income tax return, it signified its intention
(by checking the small box "refund" at the bottom of the return) to get a refund of the
d) It may prohibit or regulate trade.

63. Taxing power of local government units shall NOT extend to the following taxes,
except one:
a) Income tax on banks and other financial institutions;
b) Taxes of any kind on the national government, its agencies and
instrumentalities, and local government units;
c) Taxes on agricultural and aquatic products when sold by the marginal farmers
or fishermen;
d) Excise taxes on articles enumerated under the National Internal Revenue Code.
64. Which statement on prescriptive periods is true?
a) The prescriptive periods to assess taxes in the National Internal Revenue Code
and the Local Government Code are the same;
b) Local taxes shall be assessed within five (5) years from the date they became
due;
c) Action for the collection of local taxes may be instituted after the expiration of
the period to assess and to collect the tax;
d) Local taxes may be assessed within ten (10) years from discovery of the
underpayment of tax which does not constitute fraud.
65. The appraisal, assessment, levy and collection of real property tax shall be guided by
the following principles. Which statement does NOT belong here?
a) Real property shall be appraised at its current and fair market value;
a) Zonal values;
b) Fair market value;
c) Assessed values;
d) Reproduction values.
68. One of the local government units below does NOT have the power to impose real
property tax:
a) Bacoor, Cavite;
b) Davao City;
c) Tarlac Province;
d) Malabon, Metro Manila.
69. Where the real property tax assessment is erroneous, the remedy of the property owner
is:
b) Real property shall be classified for assessment purposes on the basis of its
actual use;
a) To file a claim for refund in the Court of Tax Appeals if he has paid the tax,
within thirty (30) days from date of payment;
c) Real property shall be assessed on the basis of a uniform classification within

each local political subdivision;
b) To file an appeal with the Provincial Board of Assessment Appeals within thirty
(30) days from receipt of the assessment;
d) The appraisal and assessment of real property shall be based on audited

financial statements of the owner.
c) To file an appeal with the Provincial Board of Assessment Appeals within sixty
(60) days from receipt of the assessment;
66. The Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA) is exempt from real property tax.
Which statement below isNOT correct?
d) To file an appeal with the Provincial Board of Assessment Appeals within sixty
(60) days from receipt of the assessment and playing the assessed tax under
protest.
a) MIAA is not a government-owned or controlled corporation because it is not

organized as a stock or non-stock corporation;
b) MIAA is a government instrumentality vested with corporate powers and
performing essential public services;
c) MIAA is not a taxable entity because the real property is owned by the
Republic of the Philippines and the beneficial use of such property has not been
granted to a private entity;
d) MIAA is a government-owned or controlled corporation because it is required
to meet the test of economic viability.
67. For purposes of real property taxes, the tax rates are applied on:
70. The City Government of Manila may NOT impose:

a) Basic real property tax at 2% of the assessed value of real property;
b) Additional levy on real property for the special education fund at 1% of the
assessed value of real property;
c) Additional ad valorem tax on idle lands at a rate not exceeding 5% of the
assessed value;
d) Special levy on lands within its territory specially benefited by public works
projects or improvements funded by it at 80% of the actual cost of the projects or
improvements.
71. Importation of goods is deemed terminated:
75. Which cases are appealable to the CTA?
a) When the customs duties are paid, even if the goods remain within the customs
premises;
a) Decisions of the Secretary of Finance in cases involving liability for customs

duties, seizure, detention or release of property affected;
b) When the goods are released or withdrawn from the customs house upon
payment of the customs duties or with legal permit to withdraw;
b) Decisions of the Commissioner of Customs in cases involving liability for

customs duties, seizure, detention or release of property affected;
c) When the goods enter Philippines territory and remain within the customs
house within thirty (30) days from date of entry;
c) Decisions of the Collector of Customs in cases involving liability for customs

duties, seizure, detention or release of property affected;
d) When there is part payment of duties on the imported goods located in the
customs area.
d) Decisions of the BIR Commissioner in cases involving liability for customs

duties, seizure, detention or release of property affected.
72. A protest against an assessment issued by the Collector of Customs for unpaid customs
duties on imported goods shall be filed with:
a) The Commissioner of Customs;
b) The Regional Trial Court;
- NOTHING FOLLOWS HAND IN YOUR ANSWER SHEET.

THERE IS NO NEED TO RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO HEAD
WATCHER.
c) The Court of Tax Appeals;

d) The Collector of Customs.
73. The dutiable value of an imported article subject to an ad valorem rate of duty under
existing law shall be:
2012
TAXATION LAW
14 October 2012
a) The home consumption value;
Set B
b) The total value;
ESSAY
INSTRUCTIONS
c) The total landed cost;

d) The transaction value.
74. The imported articles shall in any case be subject to the regular physical examination
when:
a) The importer disagrees with the findings as contained in the government
surveyors report;
b) The number, weight and nature of packages indicated in the customs entry
declaration and supporting documents differ from that in the manifest;
c) The container is not leaking or damaged;
d) The shipment is covered by alert/hold orders issued pursuant to an existing
order.
BAR
EXAMINATIONS
3:30 P.M.-5 P.M.
TYPE
QUESTIONS
The following questionnaire consists of ten (10) questions (numbered I to X) contained in

SIX (6) pages.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion/s under the same number maybe written continuously on the same page and
succeeding pages until completed.
Answer the question directly and concisely. Do not repeat the question. Write legibly.
HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK. THERE IS NO NEED TO RETURN THIS
QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE HEAD WATCHER.
GOODLUCK!!!
_____________________________________
MARTIN
S.
VILLARAMA,
JR.
Chairperson
2012 Bar Examinations Committee
PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS SEVEN (7) PAGES (INCLUDING
THIS PAGE).
WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE
machinery and equipment P50 Million; and installation P30 Million). Assume that the
project was 40% complete in 2010 and 100% complete in 2011, based on the certificates
issued by the certificates issued by the architects and engineers working on the project.
GOC paid FC as follows: P60 Million in 2010 and P40 Million in 2011, and FC paid PCC
ion foreign currency through a Philippine bank as follows: P10 Million in 2010 and P20
Million in 2011.
a) Is FC liable to Philippines income tax, and if so, how much revenue shall be
reported by it in 2010 and in 2011? Explain your answer. (5%)
TAXATION LAW
b) Is PCC, which adopted the percentage of completion method of reporting

income and expenses, liable to value added tax in 2010 and in 2011. Explain your
answer. (5%)
I
Anchor Banking Corporation, which was organized in 2000 and existing under the laws of
the Philippines and owned by the Sy Family of Makati City, set up in 2010 a branch office
in Shanghai City, China, to take advantage of the presence of many Filipino workers in
that area and its booming economy. During the year, the bank ,management decided not to
include the P20 Million net income of the Shanghai Branch in the annual Philippine
income tax return filed with the BIR, which showed a net taxable income of P30 Million ,
because the Shanghai Branch is treated as a foreign corporation and is taxed only on
income from sources within the Philippines, and since the loan and other business
transactions were done in Shanghai, these incomes are not taxable in the Philippines.
III
Mr. Jose Castillo is a resident Filipino Citizen. He purchased a parcel of land in Makati
City in 1970 at a consideration of P1 Million. In 2011, the land , which remained
undeveloped and idle, had a fair market value of P20Million. Mr. Antonio Ayala, another
Filipino citizen, is very much interested in the property and he offered to buy the same for
P20 Million. The Assessor of Makati City re-assessed in 2011 the property at P10 Million.
a) When is Mr. Castillo liable for real property tax on the land beginning 2011 or
beginning 2012? Explain your answer. (2%)
a) Is the bank correct in excluding the net income of its Shanghai Branch in the
computation of its annual corporate income tax for 2010? Explain your answer.
(5%)
b) Is Mr. Castillo liable for income tax in 2011 based on the offer to buy by Mr.
Ayala? Explain your answer. (3%)
b) Should the Shanghai Branch of Anchor Bank remit profit to its Head Office in
the Philippines in 2011, is the branch liable to the 15% branch profit remittance
tax imposed under Section 28 (A)(5) of the 1997 Tax Code? Explain your answer
(5%)
c) Should Mr. Castillo agree to sell the land to Mr. Ayala in 2012 for P20 Million,
subject to the condition as stated in The Deed of Sale that the buyer shall assume
the capital gains tax thereon, how musch is the income tax due on the transaction
and when must the tax return be filed and the tax be paid by the taxpayer? Explain
your answer. (5%)
II
Foster Corporation (FC) is a Singapore-based foreign corporation engaged in construction
and installation projects. In 2010, Global Oil Corporation (GOC), a domestic corpoartion
engaged in the refinery of petroleum products, awarded an anti-pollution project to Foster
Corporation, whereby FC shall design, supply machinery and equipment, and install an
anti-pollution device for GOCs refinery in the Philippines, provided that the installation
part of the project may be sub-contracted to a local construction company. Pursuant to the
contract, the design and supply contracts were done in Singapore by FC, while the
installation works were sub-contracted by the FC with the Philippine Construction
Corporation (PCC), a domestic corporation. The project with a total cost of P100 Million
was completed in 2011 at the following cost components: (design P20Million;
IV
Mr. Pedro Aguirre, a resident citizen, is working for a large real estate development
company in the country and in 2010, he was promoted to Vice-President of the company.
With more responsibilities comes higher pay. In 2011, he decided to buy a new car worth
P2 Million and he traded-in his old car with a market value of P800,000.00 and paid the
difference of P1.2 Million to the car company. The old car, which was bought three (3)
years ago by the father of Mr. Pedro Aguirre at price of P700,000.00 was donated by him
and registered in the name of his son. The corresponding donors tax thereon was duly
paid by the father.
a) How much is the cost basis of the old car to Mr. Aguirre? Explain your answer
(2%)
b) What is the nature of the old car capital asset or ordinary asset? Explain your
answer. (3%)
c) Is Mr. Aguirre liable to pay income tax on the gain from the sale of his old car?
Explain your answer. (5%)
V
Spouses Pablo Gonzales and Teresita Gonzales, both resident citizens acquire during their
marriage a residential house and lot located in Makati City, which is being leased to a
tenant for a monthly rental of P100,000.00. Mr. Pablo Gonzales is the President of PG
Corporation and he receives P50,000.00 salary per month. The spouses have only one (1)
minor child. In late June 2010, he was immediately brought to the hospital because of the
heart attack and he was pronounced dead on June 30, 2010.With no liabilities, the estate of
the late Pablo Gonzales was settled extra-judicially in early 2011.
a) Is Mr. Pablo Gonzales required to file income tax for 2010? If so, how much
income must he declare for the year? How much personal and additional
exemption is he entitled to? Explain your answer. (5%)
b) Is Mrs. Teresita Gonzales required to file income tax return fot 2010? If so,
how much income must she declare for the year? How much personal exemption
is she entitled to? Explain your answer. (5%)
c) Is the Estate of the late Pablo Gonzales required to file income tax return for
2010? If so, how much income must it declare for the year? How much personal
exemption is it entitled to? Explain your answer. (5%)
VI
The BIR issude in 2010 a final assessment notice and demand letter against X Corporation
covering deficiency income tas for the year 2008 in the amount of P10 Million. X
Corporation earlier requested the advice of a lawyer on whether or not it should file a
request for reconsideration or a request for reinvestigation. The lawyer said it does not
matter wheteher the protest files against the assessment is a request for reconsideration or
a request for reinvestigation, because it has same consequences or implications.
a) What are the differences between a request for reconsideration and a request for
reinvestigation? (5%)
b) Do you agree with the advice of the lawyer? Explain your answer (5%)
VII
a) May the bank deposits peso and foreign currency of the an individual taxpayer be
disclosed by a commercial bank to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in connection
with a tax investigation being conducted by revenue officials, without violating the
relevant bank secrecy laws? Explain your answer. (5%)
b) In 2011, the Commissioner of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requested in
writing the Commissioner of Internal Reveneu to get the informatrion from a bank in the
Philippines, regarding the deposits of a U.S. Citizen residing in the Philippines, who is
under examiniation by the officials of the US IRS, pursuant to the US-Philippine Tax
Treaty and othert existing laws. Should the BIR Commissioner agree to obtain such
informarion from the bank and provide the same to the IRS? Explain your answer. (5%)
c) Is the bank secrecy lawq in the Philippines violated when the BIR issues a Warrant of
Garnishment directed against a domestic bank, requiring it not to allow any withdrawal
from any existing bank deposit of he delinquent taxpayer mentioned in the Warrant and to
freeze the same until the tax delinquency of said taxpayer is settled with the BIR? Explain
your answer. (5%)
VIII
In the examination conducted by the revenue officials against the corporate taxpayer in
2010, the BIR issued a final assessment notice and demand letter which states: "It is
requested that the above deficiency tax be paid immediately upon receipt hereof, inclusive
of penalties incident to delinquency. This is our final decision based on investigation. If
you disagree, you may appeal this final decision within thirty (30) days from receipt
hereof, otherwise said deficiency tax assessment shall become final, executory and
demandable." The assessment was immediately appealed by the taxpayer to the Court of
Tax Appeals, without filing its protest against the assessment and without a denial thereof
by the BIR. If you were the judge, would your deny the petition for review filed by the
taxpayer and consider the case as prematurely filed? Explain your answer (5%)
IX
On April 16, 2012, the corporation filed its annual corporate income tax return for 2011,
showing an overpayment of income tax of P1 Million. Which is to be carried over to the
succeeding year(s). On May 15, 2012, the corporation sought advice from you and said
that it contemplates to file an amended return for 2011, which shows that instead of carry
over of the execss income tax payment, the same shall be considenred as a claim for tax
refund and the small box shown as "refund" in the return will be filled up. Withi a year,
the corporation will file the formal request for refund for the excess payment.
a) Will you recommend to the corporation such a course of action and justify that
the amended return is the latest official act of the corporation as to how it may
treat such overpayment of tax or should you consider the option granted to
taxpayers as irrevocable, once previously exercised by it? Explain your answer.
(5%)
b) Should the petition for review filed with the CTA on the basisof the amended
tax return be denied by the BIR and the CTA, could the corporationstill carry over
such excess payment of income tax in the succeeding years, considering that there
is no precriptive period provided for in the income tax law with respect to carry
over of excess income tax payments? Explain your answer. (5%)
X
Is the hospital subject to tax on its income? If it is, at what rate? (6%)
III.
ABC Corporation is registered as a holding company and has an office in the City of
Makati. It has no actual business operations. It invested in another company and its
earnings are limited to dividends from this investment, interests on its bank deposits, and
foreign exchange gains from its foreign currency account. The City of Makati assessed
ABC Corporation as a contractor or one that sells services for a fee. Is the City of Makati
correct? (6%)
IV.
Explain the following statements:

a) The acquittal of the taxpayer in a criminal action under the Tax Code does not
necessarily result in a exeoneration of said taxpayer from his civil liability to pay
taxes. (3%)
b) Should the accused be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt for violation of
Section 255 of the Tax Code for failure to file tax return or to to spply correct
information), the imposition of the civil liability by the CTA should be automatic
and no assessment notice from the BIR is necessary? (2%)
- NOTHING FOLLOWS 2013
ESSAY QUESTIONS
I.
In its final adjustment return for the 2010 taxable year, ABC Corp. had excess tax credits
arising from its over-withholding of income payments. It opted to carry over the excess
tax credits to the following year. Subsequently, ABC Corp. changed its mind and applied
for a refund of the excess tax credits.
Will the claim for refund prosper? (6%)
II.
A group of philanthropists organized a non-stock, non-profit hospital for charitable
purposes to provide medical services to the poor. The hospital also accepted paying
patients although none of its income accrued to any private individual; all income were
plowed back for the hospital's use and not more than 30% of its funds were used for
administrative purposes.
Atty. Gambino is a partner in a general professional partnership. The partnership computes

its gross revenues, claims deductions allowed under the Tax Code, and distributes the net
income to the partners, including Atty. Gambino, in accordance with its articles of
partnership.
In filing his own income tax return, Atty. Gambino claimed deductions that the partnership
did not claim, such as purchase of law books, entertainment expenses, car insurance and
car depreciation. The BIR disallowed the deductions.
Was the BIR correct? (6%)
V.
Mr. Agustin, 75 years old and suffering from an incurable disease, decided to sell for
valuable and sufficient consideration a house and lot to his son. He died one year later.
In the settlement of Mr. Agustin's estate, the BIR argued that the house and lot were
transferred in contemplation of death and should therefore form part of the gross estate for
estate tax purposes.
Is the BIR correct? (7%)
VI.
On October 15, 2005, ABC Corp. imported 1,000 kilos of steel ingots and paid customs
duties and VAT to the Bureau of Customs on the importation. On February 17, 2009, the
Bureau of Customs, citing provisions of the Tariff and Customs Code on post-audit,
investigated and assessed ABC Corp. for deficiency customs duties and VAT.
Is the Bureau of Customs correct? (7%)
VII.
XYZ Law Offices, a law partnership in the Philippines and a VAT-registered taxpayer,
received a query by e-mail from Gainsburg Corporation, a corporation organized under the
laws of Delaware, but the e-mail came from California where Gainsburg has an office.
Gainsburg has no office in the Philippines and does no business in the Philippines.
of selling the property to buy a new one. He seeks your advice on how much income tax
he would pay if he sells the property. The total zonal value of the property is P5,000,000
and the fair market value per the tax declaration is P2,500,000. He intends to sell it
forP6,000,000.
XYZ Law Offices rendered its opinion on the query and billed Gainsburg US$1,000 for
the opinion. Gainsburg remitted its payment through Citibank which converted the
remitted US$1 ,000 to pesos and deposited the converted amount in the XYZ Law Offices
account.
What material considerations will you take into account in computing the income tax?
Please explain the legal relevance of each of these considerations. (7%)
What are the tax implications of the payment to XYZ Law Offices in terms of VAT and
income taxes? (7%)
VIII.
Mr. Amado leased a piece of land owned by the Municipality of Pinagsabitan and built a
warehouse on the property for his business operations. The Municipal Assessor assessed
Mr. Amado for real property taxes on the land and the warehouse. Mr. Amado objected to
the assessment, contending that he should not be asked to pay realty taxes on the land
since it is municipal property.
Was the assessment proper? (5%)
IX.
In the settlement of the estate of Mr. Barbera who died intestate, his wife renounced her
inheritance and her share of the conjugal property in favor of their children. The BIR
determined that there was a taxable gift and thus assessed Mrs. Barbera as a donor.
Was the BIR correct? (7%)
X.
XII.
You are the retained tax counsel of ABC Corp. Your client informed you that they have
been directly approached with a proposal by a BIR insider (i.e., a middle rank BIR
official) on the tax matter they have referred to you for handling. The BIR insider's
proposal is to settle the matter by significantly reducing the assessment, but he will get
50% of the savings arising from the reduced assessment.
What tax, criminal and ethical considerations will you take into account in giving your
advice? Explain the relevance of each of these considerations. (9%)
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
I. ABC Corp. was dissolved and liquidating dividends were declared and paid to the
stockholders.
What tax consequence follows? (1%)
(A) ABC Corp. should deduct a final tax of 10% from the dividends.
(B) The stockholders should declare their gain from their investment and pay
income tax at the ordinary rates.
(C) The dividends are exempt from tax.
(D) ABC Corp. should withhold a 10% creditable tax.
In 2010, pursuant to a Letter of Authority (LA) issued by the Regional Director, Mr.
Abcede was assessed deficiency income taxes by the BIR for the year 2009. He paid the
deficiency. In 2011, Mr. Abcede received another LA for the same year 2009, this time
from the National Investigation Division, on the ground that Mr. Abcede's 2009 return was
fraudulent.
II. MGC Corp. secured an income tax holiday for 5 years as a pioneer industry. On the
fourth year of the tax holiday, MGC Corp. declared and paid cash dividends to its
stockholders, all of whom are individuals.
Mr. Abcede contested the LA on the ground that he can only be investigated once in a
taxable year. Decide. (7%)
(A) The dividends are taxable; the tax exemption of MGC Corp. does not extend
to its stockholders.
XI.
(B) The dividends are tax exempt because of MGC Corp.'s income tax holiday.
In 2000, Mr. Belen bought a residential house and lot for P1,000,000. He used the
property as his and his family's principal residence. It is now year 2013 and he is thinking
(C) The dividends are taxable if they exceed 50% of MGC Corp.'s retained
earnings.
Are the dividends taxable? (1%)
(D) The dividends are exempt if paid before the end of MGC Corp.'s fiscal year.
III. Mr. Alas sells shoes in Makati through a retail store. He pays the VAT on his gross
sales to the BIR and the municipal license tax based on the same gross sales to the City of
Makati. He comes to you for advice because he thinks he is being subjected to double
taxation.
What advice will you give him? (1%)
(A) Yes, there is double taxation and it is oppressive.
(B) The City of Makati does not have this power.
(C) Yes, there is double taxation and this is illegal m the Philippines.
(D) Double taxation is allowed where one tax is imposed by the national
government and the other by the local government.
IV. Congress passed a sin tax law that increased the tax rates on cigarettes by 1,000%. The
law was thought to be sufficient to drive many cigarette companies out of business, and
was questioned in court by a cigarette company that would go out of business because it
would not be able to pay the increased tax.
The cigarette company is __________ (1%)
(A) wrong because taxes are the lifeblood of the government
(B) wrong because the law recognizes that the power to tax is the power to
destroy
(C) correct because no government can deprive a person of his livelihood
(D) correct because Congress, in this case, exceeded its power to tax
V. Mr. Alvarez is in the retail business. He received a deficiency tax assessment from the
BIR containing only the computation of the deficiency tax and the penalties, without any
explanation of the factual and legal bases for the assessment.
Is the assessment valid? (1%)
(A) The assessment is valid; all that Mr. Alvarez has to know is the amount of the
tax.
(B) The assessment is invalid; the law requires a statement of the facts and the law
upon which the assessment is based.
(C) The assessment is valid but Mr. Alvarez can still contest it.
(D) The assessment is invalid because Mr. Alvarez has no way to determine if the
computation is erroneous.
VI. In 2010, Mr. Platon sent his sister Helen $1 ,000 via a telegraphic transfer through the
Bank of PI. The bank's remittance clerk made a mistake and credited Helen with
$1,000,000 which she promptly withdrew. The bank demanded the return of the
mistakenly credited excess, but Helen refused. The BIR entered the picture and
investigated Helen.
Would the BIR be correct if it determines that Helen earned taxable income under these
facts? (1%)
(A) No, she had no income because she had no right to the mistakenly credited
funds.
(B) Yes, income is income regardless of the source.
(C) No, it was not her fault that the funds in excess of $1,000 were credited to her.
(D) No, the funds in excess of$1,000 were in effect donated to her.
VII. The municipality of San Isidro passed an ordinance imposing a tax on installation
managers. At that time, there was only one installation manager in the municipality; thus,
only he would be liable for the tax.
Is the law constitutional? (1%)
(A) It is unconstitutional because it clearly discriminates against this person.
(B) It is unconstitutional for lack of legal basis.
(C) It is constitutional as it applies to all persons in that class.
(D) It is constitutional because the power to tax is the power to destroy.
VIII. XYZ Corporation manufactures glass panels and is almost at the point of insolvency.
It has no more cash and all it has are unsold glass panels. It received an assessment from
the BIR for deficiency income taxes. It wants to pay but due to lack of cash, it seeks
permission to pay in kind with glass panels.
Should the BIR grant the requested permission? (1%)
(A) It should grant permission to make payment convenient to taxpayers.
(B) It should not grant permission because a tax is generally a pecuniary burden.
(C) It should grant permission; otherwise, XYZ Corporation would not be able to
pay.
(D) It should not grant permission because the government does not have the
storage facilities for glass panels.
IX. Prior to the VAT law, sales of cars were subject to a sales tax but the tax applied only
to the original or the first sale; the second and subsequent sales were not subject to tax.
Deltoid Motors, Inc. (Deltoid) hit on the idea of setting up a wholly-owned subsidiary,
Gonmad Motors, Inc. (Gonmad), and of selling its assembled cars to Gonmad at a low
price so it would pay a lower tax on the first sale. Gonmad would then sell the cars to the
public at a higher price without paying any sales tax on this subsequent sale.
Characterize the arrangement. (1%)
A. The plan is a legitimate exercise of tax planning and merely takes advantage of
a loophole in the law.
B. The plan is legal because the government collects taxes anyway.
C. The plan is improper; the veil of corporate fiction can be pierced so that the
second sale will be considered the taxable sale.
D. The government must respect Gonmad's separate juridical personality and
Deltoid's taxable sale to it.
X. PRT Corp. purchased a residential house and lot with a swimming pool in an upscale
subdivision and required the company president to stay there without paying rent; it
reasoned out that the company president must maintain a certain image and be able to
entertain guests at the house to promote the company's business. The company president
declared that because they are childless, he and his wife could very well live in a smaller
house.
Was there a taxable fringe benefit? (1%)
(A) There was no taxable fringe benefit since it was for the convenience of the
employer and was necessary for its business.
(B) There was a taxable fringe benefit since the stay at the house was for free.
(C) There was a taxable fringe benefit because the house was very luxurious.
(D) There was no taxable fringe benefit because the company president was only
required to stay there and did not demand free housing.
XI. Taxpayer A was required by the BIR to sign and submit a waiver of the statute of
limitations on the assessment period, to give the BIR more time to complete its
investigation. The BIR accepted the waiver but failed to indicate the date of its
acceptance.
What is the legal status of the waiver? (1%)

(A) The waiver is valid because the date of acceptance is immaterial and
unimportant.
(B) The waiver is invalid; the taxpayer cannot be required to waive the statute of
limitations.
(C) The waiver is invalid; the date of acceptance is crucial in counting the start of
the period of suspension of the prescriptive period.
(D) The waiver is valid, having been accepted by the BIR.
XII. Taxpayer Andy received on January 3, 2010 a preliminary assessment notice (PAN)
from the BIR, stating that he had fifteen (15) days from its receipt to comment or to file a
protest. Eight (8) days later (or on January11, 2010), before he could comment or file a
protest, Andy received the final assessment notice (FAN).
Decide on the validity of the FAN. (1%)
(A) The FAN is invalid; Andy was not given the chance to respond to the PAN, in
violation of his due process rights.
(B) The FAN is invalid for being premature.
(C) The FAN is valid since it was issued before the right to assess prescribed.
(D) The FAN is valid. There is no legal requirement that the FAN should await the
protest to the PAN because protest to the PAN is not mandatory.
XIII. MSI Corp. imports orange and lemon concentrates as raw materials for the fruit
drinks it sells locally. The Bureau of Customs (BOC) imposed a 1% duty rate on the
concentrates. Subsequently, the BOC changed its position and held that the concentrates
should be taxed at 7% duty rate. MSI disagreed with the ruling and questioned it in the
CTA which upheld MSI's position. The Commissioner of Customs appealed to the CTA en
bane without filing a motion for reconsideration.
Resolve the appeal. (1%)
(A) The appeal should be dismissed because a motion for reconsideration is
mandatory.
(B) The appeal should be dismissed for having been filed out of time.
(C) The appeal should be given due course since a motion for reconsideration is a
useless exercise.
(D) The appeal should be upheld to be fair to the government which needs taxes.
XIV. The spouses Jun and Elvira Sandoval purchased a piece of land for P5,000,000 and
included their two (2) minor children as co-purchasers in the Deed of Absolute Sale. The
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) ruled that there was an implied donation and
assessed donors' taxes against the spouses.
Rule on the CIR's action. (1%)
(A) The CIR is wrong; a donation must be express.
(B) The CIR is wrong; financial capacity is not a requirement for a valid sale.
(C) The CIR is correct; the amount involved is huge and ultimately ends up with
the children.
(D) The CIR is correct; there was animus donandi since the children had no
financial capacity to be co-purchasers.
XV. Pheleco is a power generation and distribution company operating mainly from the
City of Taguig. It owns electric poles which it also rents out to other companies that use
poles such as telephone and cable companies. Taguig passed an ordinance imposing a fee
equivalent to 1% of the annual rental for these poles. Pheleco questioned 'the legality of
the ordinance on the ground that it imposes an income tax which local government units
(LGUs) are prohibited from imposing.
Rule on the validity of the ordinance. (1%)
(D) She had no taxable income since moral damages are compensatory.
XVII. Mr. Mayuga donated his residential house and lot to his son and duly paid the
donor's tax. In the Deed of Donation, Mr. Mayuga expressly reserved for himself the
usufruct over the property for as long as he lived.
Describe the donated property from the taxation perspective. (1%)
(A) The property will form part of Mr. Mayuga's gross estate when he dies.
(B) The property will not fom1 part of Mr. Mayuga's gross estate when he dies
because he paid the donor's tax.
(C) The property will form part of Mr. Mayuga's gross estate because he died soon
after the donation.
(D) The property will not form part of Mr. Mayuga's gross estate because it is no
longer his.
XVIII. Mr. Z made an importation which he declared at the Bureau of Customs (BOC) as
"Used Truck Replacement Parts". Upon investigation, the container vans contained 15
units of Porsche and Ferrari cars.
Characterize Mr. Z's action. (1%)
(A) Mr. Z committed smuggling.
(A) The ordinance is void; the fee is based on rental income and is therefore a tax
on income.
(B) Mr. Z did not commit smuggling because he submitted his shipment to BOC
examination.
(B) The ordinance is valid as a legitimate exercise of police power to regulate

electric poles.
(C) Mr. Z only made a misdeclaration, but did not commit smuggling.
(C) The ordinance is void; 1% of annual rental is excessive and oppressive.

(D) The ordinance is valid; an LGU may impose a tax on income.
XVI. Aleta sued Boboy for breach of promise to marry. Boboy lost the case and duly paid
the court's award that included, among others, Pl00,000 as moral damages for the mental
anguish Aleta suffered.
Did Aleta earn a taxable income? (1%)
(A) She had a taxable income of P100,000 since income is income from whatever
source.
(B) She had no taxable income because it was a donation.
(C) She had taxable income since she made a profit.
(D) Mr. Z did not commit smuggling because the shipment has not left the
customs area.
XIX. Mr. A was preparing his income tax return and had some doubt on whether a
commission he earned should be declared for the current year or for the succeeding year.
He sought the opinion of his lawyer who advised him to report the commission in the
succeeding year. He heeded his lawyer's advice and reported the commission in the
succeeding year. The lawyer's advice turned out to be wrong; in Mr. A's petition against
the BIR assessment, the court ruled against Mr. A.
Is Mr. A guilty of fraud? (1%)
(A) Mr. A is not guilty of fraud as he simply followed the advice of his lawyer.
(B) Mr. A is guilty of fraud; he deliberately did not report the commission in the
current year when he should have done so.
(C) Mr. A's lawyer should pay the tax for giving the wrong advice.
(D) Mr. A is guilty for failing to consult his accountant.
XX. The BIR, through the Commissioner, instituted a system requiring taxpayers to
submit to the BIR a summary list of their sales and purchases during the year, indicating
the name of the seller or the buyer and the amount. Based on these lists, the BIR
discovered that in 2004 ABC Corp. purchased from XYZ Corp. goods worthP5,000,000.
XYZ Corp. did not declare these for income tax purposes as its reported gross sales for
2004was only Pl,000,000.
Which of the following defenses may XYZ Corp. interpose in an assessment against it by
the BIR? (1%)
(A) The BIR has no authority to obtain third party information to assess taxpayers.
(B) The third party information is inadmissible as hearsay evidence.
(C) The system of requiring taxpayers to submit third party information is illegal
for violating the right to privacy.
(D) None of the above.
NOTHING FOLLOWS
2014
I.
On March 27, 2012, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued a notice of assessment
against Blue Water Industries Inc. (BWI), a domestic corporation, informing the latter of
its alleged deficiency corporate income tax for the year 2009. On April 20, 2012, BWI
filed a letter protest before the BIR contesting said assessment and demanding that the
same be cancelled or set aside.
However, on May 19, 2013, that is, after more than a year from the filing of the letter
protest, the BIR informed BWI that the latters letter protest was denied on the ground that
the assessment had already become final, executory and demandable. The BIR reasoned
that its failure to decide the case within 180 days from filing of the letter protest should
have prompted BWI to seek recourse before the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) by filing a
petition for review within thirty (30) days after the expiration of the 180-day period as
mandated by the provisions of the last paragraph of Section 228 of the National Internal
Revenue Code (NIRC). Accordingly, BWIs failure to file a petition for review before the
CTA rendered the assessment final, executory and demandable. Is the contention of the
BIR correct? Explain. (5%)
II.
Mr. De Sarapen is a candidate in the upcoming Senatorial elections. Mr. De Almacen,
believing in the sincerity and ability of Mr. De Sarapen to introduce much needed reforms
in the country, contributed P500,000.00 in cash to the campaign chest of Mr. De Sarapen.
In addition, Mr. De Almacen purchased tarpaulins, t-shirts, umbrellas, caps and other
campaign materials that he also donated to Mr. De Sarapen for use in his campaign. Is the
contribution of cash and campaign materials subject to donors tax? (4%)
III.
Dr. Taimtim is an alumnus of the College of Medicine of Universal University (UU), a
privately-owned center for learning which grants yearly dividends to its stockholders.
UU has a famous chapel located within the campus where the old folks used to say that
anyone who wanted to pass the medical board examinations should offer a dozen roses on
all the Sundays of October. This was what Dr. Taimtim did when he was still reviewing
for the board examinations. In his case, the folk saying proved to be true because he is
now a successful cardiologist. Wanting to give back to the chapel and help defray the costs
of its maintenance, Dr. Taimtim donated P50,000.00 to the caretakers of the chapel which
was evidenced by an acknowledgment receipt.
In computing his net taxable income, can Dr.Taimtim use his donation to the chapel as an
allowable deduction from his gross income under the National Internal Revenue Code
(NIRC)? (4%)
IV.
Gangwam Corporation (GC) filed its quarterly tax returns for the calendar year 2012 as
follows:
First quarter - April 25, 2012
Second quarter - July 23, 2012
Third quarter - October 25, 2012
Fourth quarter - January 27, 2013
On December 22, 2013, GC filed with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) an
administrative claim for refund of its unutilized input Value-Added Tax (VAT) for the
calendar year 2012. After several months of inaction by the BIR on its claim for refund,
GC decided to elevate its claim directly to the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) on April 22,
2014.
In due time, the CTA denied the tax refund relative to the input VAT of GC for the first
quarter of 2012, reasoning that the claim was filed beyond the two-year period prescribed
under Section 112(A) of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC).
(A) Is the CTA correct? (3%)
(B) Assuming that GC filed its claim before the CTA on February 22, 2014, would
your answer be the same? (3%)
V.
The City of Liwliwa assessed local business taxes against Talin Company. Claiming that
there is double taxation, Talin Company filed a Complaint for Refund or Recovery of
Illegally and/or Erroneously-collected Local Business Tax; Prohibition with Prayer to
Issue Temporary Restraining Order and Writ of Preliminary Injunction with the Regional
Trial Court (RTC). The RTC denied the application for a Writ of Preliminary Injunction.
Since its motion for reconsideration was denied, Talin Company filed a special civil action
for certiorari with the Court of Appeals (CA). The government lawyer representing the
City of Liwliwa prayed for the dismissal of the petition on the ground that the same
should have been filed with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). Talin Company, through its
lawyer, Atty. Frank, countered that the CTA cannot entertain a petition for certiorari since
it is not one of its powers and authorities under existing laws and rules.
Decide. (5%)
VI.
Choose the correct answer. Smuggling - (1%)
(A) does not extend to the entry of imported or exported articles by means of any
false or fraudulent invoice, statement or practices; the entry of goods at less than
the true weight or measure; or the filing of any false or fraudulent entry for the
payment of drawback or refund of duties.
(B) is limited to the import of contraband or highly dutiable cargo beyond the
reach of customs authorities.
(C) is committed by any person who shall fraudulently import or bring into the
Philippines, or assist in so doing, any article, contrary to law, or shall receive,
conceal, buy, sell or any manner facilitate the transportation, concealment or sale
of such article after importation, knowing the same to have been imported
contrary to law.
VII.
In accordance with the Local Government Code (LGC), the Sangguniang Panglungsod
(SP) of Baguio City enacted Tax Ordinance No. 19, Series of 2014, imposing a P50.00 tax
on all the tourists and travellers going to Baguio City. In imposing the local tax, the SP
reasoned that the tax collected will be used to maintain the cleanliness of Baguio City and
for the beautification of its tourist attractions. (D) is punishable by administrative penalty
only.
Claiming the tax to be unjust, Baguio Travellers Association (BTA), an association of
travel agencies in Baguio City, filed a petition for declaratory relief before the Regional
Trial Court (RTC) because BTA was apprehensive that tourists might cancel their
bookings with BTAs member agencies. BTA also prayed for the issuance of a Temporary
Restraining Order (TRO) to enjoin Baguio City from enforcing the local tax on their
customers and on all tourists going to Baguio City.
The RTC issued a TRO enjoining Baguio City from imposing the local tax. Aggrieved,
Baguio City filed a petition for certiorari before the Supreme Court (SC) seeking to set
aside the TRO issued by the RTC on the ground that collection of taxes cannot be
enjoined. Will the petition prosper? (5%)
VIII.
Masarap Kumain, Inc. (MKI) is a Value-Added Tax (VAT)-registered company which has
been engaged in the catering business for the past 10 years. It has invested a substantial
portion of its capital on flat wares, table linens, plates, chairs, catering equipment, and
delivery vans. MKI sold its first delivery van, already 10 years old and idle, to Magpapala
Gravel and Sand Corp. (MGSC), a corporation engaged in the business of buying and
selling gravel and sand. The selling price of the delivery van was way below its
acquisition cost. Is the sale of the delivery van by MKI to MGSC subject to VAT? (4%)
IX.
Mr. Gipit borrowed from Mr. Maunawain P100,000.00, payable in five (5) equal monthly
installments. Before the first installment became due, Mr. Gipit rendered general cleaning
services in the entire office building of Mr. Maunawain, and as compensation therefor, Mr.
Maunawain cancelled the indebtedness of Mr. Gipit up to the amount of P75,000.00. Mr.
Gipit claims that the cancellation of his indebtedness cannot be considered as gain on his
part which must be subject to income tax, because according to him, he did not actually
receive payment from Mr. Maunawain for the general cleaning services. Is Mr. Gipit
correct? Explain. (4%)
X.
Which of the following is an exclusion from gross income? (1%)
(A) Salaries and wages
(B) Cash dividends
Mr. X, a Filipino residing in Alabama, U.S.A., died on January 2, 2013 after undergoing a
major heart surgery. He left behind to his wife and two (2) kids several properties, to wit:
(4%)
(1) Family home in Makati City;
(C) Liquidating dividends after dissolution of a corporation
(2) Condominium unit in Las Pias City;
(D) De minimis benefits
(3) Proceeds of health insurance from Take Care, a health maintenance

organization in the Philippines; and
(E) Embezzled money

XI.
(4) Land in Alabama, U.S.A.
Triple Star, a domestic corporation, entered into a Management Service Contract with
Single Star, a non-resident foreign corporation with no property in the Philippines. Under
the contract, Single Star shall provide managerial services for Triple Stars Hongkong
branch. All said services shall be performed in Hongkong.
The following expenses were paid:

(1) Funeral expenses;
(2) Medical expenses; and
Is the compensation for the services of Single Star taxable as income from sources within
the Philippines? Explain. (4%)
(3) Judicial expenses in the testate proceedings.

(A) What are the items that must be considered as part of the gross estate income
of Mr. X?
XII.
Which of the following should not be claimed as deductions from gross income? (1%)
(B) What are the items that may be considered as deductions from the gross
estate?
(A) discounts given to senior citizens on certain goods and services.

(B) advertising expense to maintain some form of goodwill for the taxpayers
business.
XV.
When is a pre-assessment notice required under the following cases? (1%)
(C) salaries and bonuses paid to employees.
(A) When the finding for any deficiency tax is the result of mathematical error in
the computation of the tax as appearing on the face of the return.
(D) interest payment on loans for the purchase of machinery and equipment used
in business.
(B) When a discrepancy has been determined between the tax withheld and the
amount actually remitted by the withholding agent.
XIII.
Hopeful Corporation obtained a loan from Generous Bank and executed a mortgage on its
real property to secure the loan. When Hopeful Corporation failed to pay the loan,
Generous Bank extrajudicially foreclosed the mortgage on the property and acquired the
same as the highest bidder. A month after the foreclosure, Hopeful Corporation exercised
its right of redemption and was able to redeem the property. Is Generous Bank liable to
pay capital gains tax as a result of the foreclosure sale? Explain. (4%)
XIV.
(C) When the excise tax due on excisable articles has been paid.
(D) When an article locally purchased or imported by an exempt person, such as,
but not limited to vehicles, capital equipment, machineries and spare parts, has
been sold, traded or transferred to non-exempt persons.
XVI.
Mr. Tiaga has been a law-abiding citizen diligently paying his income taxes. On May 5,
2014, he was surprised to receive an assessment notice from the Bureau of Internal
Revenue (BIR) informing him of a deficiency tax assessment as a result of a mathematical
error in the computation of his income tax, as appearing on the face of his income tax
return for the year 2011, which he filed on April 15, 2012. Mr. Tiaga believes that there
was no such error in the computation of his income tax for the year 2011. Based on the
assessment received by Mr. Tiaga, may he already file a protest thereon? (4%)
XVII.
In a civil case for Annulment of Contract of Sale, plaintiff Ma. Reklamo presented in
evidence the Contract of Sale which she sought to be annulled. No documentary stamp tax
on the Contract of Sale was paid because according to plaintiff Ma. Reklamo, there was
no need to pay the same since the sale was not registered with the Register of Deeds.
Plaintiff Ma. Reklamo is now offering the Contract of Sale as her evidence. Is the Contract
of Sale admissible? (4%)
XX.
During his lifetime, Mr. Sakitin obtained a loan amounting to P10 million from Bangko
Uno for the purchase of a parcel of land located in Makati City, using such property as
collateral for the loan. The loan was evidenced by a duly notarized promissory note.
Subsequently, Mr. Sakitin died. At the time of his death, the unpaid balance of the loan
amounted to P2 million. The heirs of Mr. Sakitin deducted the amount of P2 million from
the gross estate, as part of the "Claims against the Estate." Such deduction was disallowed
by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Examiner, claiming that the mortgaged property
was not included in the computation of the gross estate. Do you agree with the BIR?
Explain. (4%)
XXI.
XVIII.
Madam X owns real property in Caloocan City. On July 1, 2014, she received a notice of
assessment from the City Assessor, informing her of a deficiency tax on her property. She
wants to contest the assessment. (4%)
(A) What are the administrative remedies available to Madam X in order to
contest the assessment and their respective prescriptive periods?
(B) May Madam X refuse to pay the deficiency tax assessment during the
pendency of her appeal?
XIX.
The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No.
65-2012 imposing Value-Added Tax (VAT) on association dues and membership fees
collected by condominium corporations from its member condominium-unit owners. The
RMCs validity is challenged before the Supreme Court (SC) by the condominium
corporations.
The Solicitor General, counsel for BIR, claims that association dues, membership fees,
and other assessment/charges collected by a condominium corporation are subject to VAT
since they constitute income payments or compensation for the beneficial services it
provides to its members and tenants.
On the other hand, the lawyer of the condominium corporations argues that such dues and
fees are merely held in trust by the condominium corporations exclusively for their
members and used solely for administrative expenses in implementing the condominium
corporations purposes. Accordingly, the condominium corporations do not actually render
services for a fee subject to VAT.
Whose argument is correct? Decide. (5%)
On August 31, 2014, Haelton Corporation (HC), thru its authorized representative Ms.
Pares, sold a 16-storey commercial building known as Haeltown Building to Mr. Belly for
P100 million. Mr. Belly, in turn, sold the same property on the same day to Bell Gates,
Inc. (BGI) for P200 million. These two (2) transactions were evidenced by two (2)
separate Deeds of Absolute Sale notarized on the same day by the same notary public.
Investigations by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) showed that:
(1) the Deed of Absolute Sale between Mr. Belly and BGI was notarized ahead of the sale
between HC and Mr. Belly; (2) as early as May 17, 2014, HC received P40 million from
BGI, and not from Mr. Belly; (3) the said payment of P40 million was recorded by BGI in
its books as of June 30, 2014 as investment in Haeltown Building; and (4) the substantial
portion of P40 million was withdrawn by Ms. Pares through the declaration of cash
dividends to all its stockholders.
Based on the foregoing, the BIR sent Haeltown Corporation a Notice of Assessment for
deficiency income tax arising from an alleged simulated sale of the aforesaid commercial
building to escape the higher corporate income tax rate of thirty percent (30%). What is
the liability of Haeltown Corporation, if any? (4%)
XXII.
Choose the correct answer. Double Taxation - (1%)
(A) is one of direct duplicate taxations wherein two (2) taxes must be imposed on
the same subject matter, by the same taxing authority, within the same
jurisdiction, during the same period, with the same kind or character of tax, even
if the purposes of imposing the same are different.
(B) is forbidden by law; and therefore, it is a valid defense against the validity of a
tax measure.
(C) means taxing the same property twice when it should be taxed only once; it is
tantamount to taxing the same person twice by the same jurisdiction for the same
thing.
(B) What are the items in the above-mentioned payments which may be
considered as deductions from the gross income of ABC Law Firm? Explain.
(C) If ABC Law Firm earns net income in 2012, what, if any, is the tax
consequence on the part of ABC Law Firm insofar as the payment of income tax
is concerned? What, if any, is the tax consequence on the part of A, B, and C as
individual partners, insofar as the payment of income tax is concerned?
(D) exists when a corporation is assessed with local business tax as a

manufacturer, and at the same time, value-added tax as a person selling goods in
the course of trade or business.
XXIII.
XXV.
Choose the correct answer. Tax Avoidance (1%)
Which of the following transactions is subject to Value-Added Tax (VAT)? (1%)
(A) is a scheme used outside of those lawful means and, when availed of, it
usually subjects the taxpayer to further or additional civil or criminal liabilities.
(A) Sale of shares of stock-listed and traded through the local stock exchange
(B) Importation of personal and household effects belonging to residents of the
Philippines returning from abroad subject to custom duties under the Tariff and
Customs Code
(B) is a tax saving device within the means sanctioned by law.

(C) is employed by a corporation, the organization of which is prompted more on
the mitigation of tax liabilities than for legitimate business purpose.
(C) Services rendered by individuals pursuant to an employeremployee

relationship
(D) is any form of tax deduction scheme, regardless if the same is legal or not.
(D) Gross receipts from lending activities by credit or multi-purpose cooperatives

duly registered with the Cooperative Development Authority
XXIV.
A, B, and C, all lawyers, formed a partnership called ABC Law Firm so that they can
practice their profession as lawyers. For the year 2012, ABC Law Firm received earnings
and paid expenses, among which are as follows: (6%)
Earnings:
(1) Professional/legal fees from various clients
(2) Cash prize received from a religious society in recognition of the exemplary
service of ABC Law Firm
(3) Gains derived from sale of excess computers and laptops
Payments:
(1) Salaries of office staff
(2) Rentals for office space
XXVI.
Freezy Corporation, a domestic corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of ice
cream, made payments to an officer of Frosty Corporation, a competitor in the ice cream
business, in exchange for said officers revelation of Frosty Corporations trade secrets.
May Freezy Corporation claim the payment to the officer as deduction from its gross
income? Explain. (4%)
XXVII.
In January 2013, your friend got his first job as an o ffice clerk. He is single and lives with
his family who depends upon him for financial support. His parents have long retired from
their work, and his two (2) siblings are still minors and studying in grade school. In
February 2014, he consulted you as he wanted to comply with all the rules pertaining to
the preparation and filing of his income tax return. He now asks you the following:
(3) Representation expenses incurred in meetings with clients
(A) Is he entitled to personal exemptions? If so, how much? (1%)
(A) What are the items in the above mentioned earnings which should be included
in the computation of ABC Law Firms gross income? Explain.
(B) Is he entitled to additional exemptions? If so, how much? (1%)

(C) What is the effect of the taxes withheld from his salaries on his taxable
income? (2%)
XXVIII.
Choose the correct answer. Tax laws - (1%)
(A) may be enacted for the promotion of private enterprise or business for as long
as it gives incidental advantage to the public or the State
Atty. ELP, filed a written claim for recovery of said local business taxes and contested the
assessment. Her claim was denied, and so Atty. ELP elevated her case to the Regional
Trial Court (RTC).
(C) are territorial in nature; hence, they do not recognize the generally-accepted
tenets of international law
The RTC declared Tax Ordinance No. 24 null and void and without legal effect for having
been enacted in violation of the public ation requirement of tax ordinances and revenue
measures under the Local Government Code (LGC) and on the ground of double taxation.
On appeal, the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) affirmed the decision of the RTC. No motion
for reconsideration was filed and the decision became final and executory. (4%)
(D) adhere to uniformity and equality when all taxable articles or kinds of
property of the same class are taxable at the same rate
(A) If you are Atty. ELP, what advice will you give Doa Evelina so that she can
recover the subject local business taxes?
(B) are inherently legislative; therefore, may not be delegated
XXIX.
Doa Evelina, a rich widow engaged in the business of currency exchange, was assessed a
considerable amount of local business taxes by the City Government of Bagnet by virtue
of Tax Ordinance No. 24. Despite her objections thereto, Doa Evelina paid the taxes.
Nevertheless, unsatisfied with said Tax Ordinance, Doa Evelina, through her counsel
(B) If Doa Evelina eventually recovers the local business taxes, must the same be
considered as income taxable by the national government?
---ooo0ooo---

Taxation Law Bar Questions 06-14

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Taxation Law Bar Questions 06-14

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Taxation Law Bar Questions 06-14

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ta x a t i o n L a w B a r Q u e s t i o n s - P a g e | 1

Taxation law Bar Questions

b. from income tax only

c. from value-added tax only

1. Enumerate the 3 stages or aspects of taxation. Explain each. 5%

d. from real property tax only

2. Distinguish "direct taxes" from "Indirect taxes". Give examples. 5%

e. from capital gains tax only

a. correct his accounting records to reflect the actual deductions mad

b. reduce his gross income

c. reduce his output value-added tax liability

1. How much personal exemption can Charlie claim? Explain. 2.5%

2. How much additional exemption can Charlie claim? Explain. 2.5%

The Local Government Code took effect on January 1, 1992.

c. Is Alpha Corporation subject to income tax on the exchange of property? If so,

a. Is the Estate of Jaime Asuncion liable for estate tax? Explain. ( 4% )

Do you agree with the position of BAT Corporation? Explain. ( 5% )

July 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006

January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007

July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007

a. Resolve with reasons Jessie's criminal complaint. (4%)

a. What advice will you give the trustee? Explain. (3%)

b. Is Miguel entitled to the rule of reciprocity in order to be exempt from the

What remedy or remedies are available to the taxpayer? Explain. (4%)

e. Judgments, resolutions or orders of the Regional Trial Court in the exercise of

b. What is the "immediacy test"? Explain briefly. (2%)

The capitalization rules may be resorted to by the BIR in order to compel

g. Informers reward is subject to a final withholding tax of 10%.

Quezon City branch

Legal fees for the settlement of

Medical expenses of last illness 600,000

House and lot (family home) in P

Claims against a cousin who

Claims against the estate

Shares of stock in ABC Corp, a

The expenses and charges on the estate are

(B) income has been actually received in money or its equivalent.

(A) Power to destroy theory

(A) violates substantive due process.

(B) Lifeblood theory

(B) does not violate substantive due process.

(C) Sumptuary theory

(C) violates the right to equal protection.

(D) Symbiotic doctrine

(D) does not violate the right to equal protection.

(A) Anktryd shall be subject to a tax of 6% of P12 million.

(C) Anktryd's gain of P5 million shall be subject to the holding period.

(C) No. Aplets is a non-resident foreign corporation not engaged in trade or

(A) usually subject to a final tax.

(C) taxable only if earned by a citizen.

(B) exempt from income taxation.

(B) it simultaneously seeks BIR approval of its new accounting period.

(D) its constitution and by-laws authorizes the change.

(A) Transfers for public use

(C) Standard deduction of P1 million

(B) Property previously taxed

(A) 180 days.

(D) None. Its right to appeal to the CTA has prescribed.

(C) No. The taxpayer did not apply for a compromise.