How To Design An in Building DAS Part 2

How to Properly Design
an In-Building DAS
Part II: The DAS Design Process
by Minfei Leng
How to Properly Design

an In-Building DAS
Introduction
RF in-building coverage has become a fast growing
market in recent years. Commercial wireless users
increasingly demand reliable communications inside
office and residential buildings for their business and
personal needs. At the same time, various local
municipalities have issued ordinances to ensure that
construction of new buildings include adequate radio
coverage of public safety signals. Efforts are also
underway to develop and implement national level
model codes for public safety in-building
communications, as seen by recent initiatives at National
Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the International
Code Council (ICC).
A typical in-building coverage system consists of two
major components, a bi-directional amplifier (BDA, or
signal booster) relaying and amplifying the RF signal
traffic between the remote base station and the
portable or mobile radios, and a network to distribute
the signal to every corner of the desired coverage area.
How to Properly Design an In-Building DAS
PAGE 2
The most common type of the distribution network is a

system of coax cables and indoor antennas called a
Distributed Antenna System or DAS.
Most of the reference materials and application notes
on in-building coverage solutions have focused on the
booster technologies or system design architecture. One
often overlooked aspect in the system design is the DAS
implementation. This includes connecting all the cables
and antennas throughout the building and balancing the
signal levels at each DAS node. If ignored, an
improperly designed DAS results in degraded
performance and unnecessary cost increases. This 2-part
series of articles is an effort to outline a simple process
of designing a DAS in order to achieve the most
efficient RF coverage distribution. Part I talks about the
Use of Directional Couplers in DAS and Part II covers the
DAS Design Process.
Part II: The DAS Design

The first step of DAS design is to obtain an accurate
Process and up-to-date blueprint of the building. An
architectural drawing is best, but even a fire exit map will suffice, as
long as its drawn to scale. Be careful when using the scale on any
drawing to calculate the real dimensions; the piece of paper sitting on
your desk may not be the same size of the paper when the drawing
was originally made. If it has been shrunk to fit your 8.5x11 printer
paper, the 1in = 10ft scale printed on the drawing is no longer valid.
When in doubt, it is always a good idea to double check. Known
building dimensions or square footage are also good references.
Another simple rule of thumb is to check the opening of a regular single
door, which has to have a 36-inch clearance as specified by ADA.
PAGE 3
Therefore, when everything else fails, you can always calculate the scale
by measuring width of a door on the drawing.
The second step is to make sure you know all the relevant physical
information related to the building and the DAS installation. What kind
of material was used for exterior construction? Could some RF signals be
present on upper floors and near exterior boundaries that will reduce the
need for the in-building coverage? What kind of material was used for
interior construction, drywall or concrete? Is the building designed for a
special application that may result in RF blockage? Many hospitals and
power generating plants fall into this category. Are there any restrictions
on the cable runs and antennas installation? Some buildings wont allow
any visible hardware for aesthetic reasons. Where can the cables go
between floors? Where will the head-end booster be located? Answers
to these questions will have a great impact on the coverage area for
each DAS node, hence dictating where and how the DAS should be
installed.
A quick word on another type
of DAS: radiating cable. It is
essentially a coax cable with
lots of tiny slits cut along the
length of the cable. Each slit
functions as a tiny antenna
with RF energy leaking out of
it, hence the nickname leaky
cable. The signal levels
coming out of the radiating
cable are pretty low, so the coverage area is typically no more than 20
or 30 ft on either side of the cable. Therefore, its better suited for areas
that are long and narrow such as tunnels or long hallways. Because of the
fact that signals are coming out of the cables throughout, the insertion loss
of the cable is typically higher than comparable coax and its something
to keep in mind during the DAS design. For the rest of this article, I will

PAGE 4
focus on the coax and antenna type of DAS, but the layout of a
radiating cable DAS can use the same design guidelines.
With a scaled building blueprint in hand and a good understanding of
the particular limitations of the project, the designer can now sit down
and map out all the DAS nodes, i.e. locations of the antennas. Typically,
an omni-directional indoor antenna with 0 dBd of gain can adequately
cover an area with a 100~150 ft radius at 800 MHz, a 200~250 ft
radius at UHF, and a 300~400 ft radius at VHF. These numbers are
derived from link budgets based on the free space loss at those
frequencies and the typical power level put out by the signal booster.
Obviously, the designer has to exercise his or her judgment to account for
the unique circumstances
of the project. The same
antenna, at the same
frequency, will have
very different coverage
on an open office floor
with cubicles versus
coverage on a
dormitory with many
small rooms separated
by concrete walls.
After the location for each antenna node is picked out, the designer
connects the dots, with the lines representing cables in real life. We can
measure the length of the cable on paper, and then use the scale to
calculate the cable length. The insertion loss for the cable is calculated
based on specifications provided by the manufacturer. So, at this point,
we know the location and loss of each cable run. See Figure 6 for a
simplified drawing of one floor in a building, with two antenna nodes. Its
assumed that this DAS covers multiple levels in the building, so there is a
vertical cable run that connects each floor. Therefore, we have two
antennas on the floor, one cable split for those 2 antennas, and another
cable split for the vertical cable run.
PAGE 5
Figure 6.
An Example of One Floor in a Building DAS
Figure 7.
Abstract DAS Drawing
In order to make it easier to

see, a DAS design is often
drawn up with 2 sets of
diagrams, one with direct
marking on the building
blueprint to indicate the
location of the antennas and
cable splits, and a second set
of abstract drawings
(typically in VisioTM or
AutocadTM) showing the cable
lengths and coupler models.
Figure 7 shows the abstract
version of the drawing for the
same DAS in Figure 6.
Here comes the important part
of DAS design: how do you
connect all the cable segments
and antennas to make them
into a network? As discussed in
Part I of this article, directional
couplers are much better
alternatives than splitters at
this task. They offer various
power split ratios to allow the
designer flexibility in
balancing the power level at
each DAS node.
The main goal of using couplers is to offset the difference in cable losses
by using the different loss ratios between the two outputs of the coupler.
For example, if a cable run is split into two branches, say 15 dB IL in one
branch vs. 5 dB IL in the other, we would like to select a coupler that has
10 dB of difference in power split ratios. Put the lower loss port on the
PAGE 6
higher loss branch,

and the higher loss
port on the lower loss
branch, and Presto:
we have two
branches with same
amount of total losses
(including the coupler
and the cable). Most
manufacturers of
directional couplers
provide a series of
Figure 8.
products with
DAS with Cable Losses
different split ratios to
allow the designer to match the loss differentials as closely as possible.
Back to the example we were looking at. In Figure 8, we have a branch
with 150 ft of cable with about 3.3 dB of insertion loss, and another
branch of 3 ft jumper cable with 0.5 dB of loss. We need to select a
coupler that can make up the loss differential in the two cable runs.
Browsing through the table of available couplers in a catalog, we select
a coupler model number with a 4.8/1.8 dB split ratio as Coupler #1. If
we connect the
longer cable run to
the throughput port
with 1.8 dB, and
connect the shorter
cable run to the
coupled port with
4.8 dB, the total
losses from the
input of the coupler
to the antennas are
3.3 + 1.8 = 5.1 dB
Figure 9.
and 0.5 + 4.8 =
Calculation of Cumulative Loss in DAS
PAGE 7
5.3 dB respectively. If we had used a 3 dB splitter, the total losses would

have been 3.3 + 3 = 6.3 dB and 0.5 + 3 = 3.5 dB. Right away, one can
see the benefit of using a coupler as it manages to balance the signal
levels at the two antennas within 0.2 dB of each other.
Next, we work our way backwards toward the booster. We take the
worse number of the two above (5.1 and 5.3 dB, so we use 5.3 dB), and
add the 0.5 dB cable loss between the two couplers, we get 5.8 dB,
which is the loss from the output of Coupler #2 to either Antenna #1 or
Antenna #2. See Figure 9 for the illustration of calculating the cumulative
loss.
Now, lets assume there are more floors above this one. The DAS on the
upper floor has been balanced using couplers in the same way as
illustrated, and the total loss in the DAS on the upper floor has been
calculated to be 10 dB. See Figure 10 as we propagate the loss in the
DAS backwards toward the booster.
Again, we want to select a coupler that will offset the loss differential
and balance the signal levels. Browsing through the coupler catalog, we
find a coupler with a 6/1.2 dB split ratio. If we connect the 6 dB coupled
port to the lower
loss DAS on this
floor, and the 1.2
dB throughput
port to the higher
loss DAS on the
upper floor, we
get 5.8 + 6 =
11.8 dB and 10
+ 1.2 = 11.2 dB.
Therefore, the
total losses from
the input of
Coupler #2 to the
Figure 10.
cable runs on this
Calculation of More Cumulative DAS Loss
PAGE 8
floor and the cable

runs on the upper
floor are within 0.6
dB of each other.
See Figure 11 for a
total tally of all the
losses.
If there are more
floors below it or
more cable splits
between this one
and the booster, the
Figure 11.
same iteration is to
Completed DAS Design for One Floor
be repeated until
we work all the way back to the booster. A typical in-building coverage
system can vary from 10,000 sq ft to 1,000,000 sq ft or more, with the
number of couplers from a handful to hundreds. However, the rules of
calculating the losses and selecting the couplers stay the same, allowing
the designer to balance any DAS and achieve the optimal signal levels
throughout the network.
As mentioned before, the total DAS loss should be limited to no more than
25~30 dB, in order to maintain a sufficient signal to noise ratio. As we
start calculating the loss and selecting couplers from the remote end of
the DAS and work backwards toward the booster, we eventually get to a
point that the system loss exceeds the limit. We know that we will need to
insert an in-line booster at that point. The exact location is of course
dependent on the practical constraints of the building, but wherever the
in-line booster is, the cumulative loss ends at its output, and starts from
zero again on the other side of the in-line booster. Another alternative is
to use coax with larger diameters with lower insertion loss. But that option
carries its own disadvantages such as high material and labor costs, as
well as the physical limitations on bending radius and weight support
issues.
PAGE 9
In summary, DAS design is a combination of node placement and simple

mathematics. Couplers and coax cables do not have the glamour or
complexity of the signal booster. However, a little attention to these often
overlooked components in the DAS goes a long way to ensure that the
performance of the system lives up to the design specification and, more
importantly, to the expectation of the customer.
About the Author

Bird Technologies has been the industry's standard
in radio frequency product reliability for over 70 years.
The criticality and definition of "reliability" can range
from accuracy and precision to longevity and clarity.
The uses can range from commercial applications to
military maintenance to electronic military
instrumentation. The measures of radio frequency
products quality (and success) can range from data
analysis to power measurement to signal strength. Bird
Technologies has a single-minded devotion to reliability
no matter the criticality, use, or metrics. Bird = the
world's most reliable radio frequency products. With
Bird Technologies . . . Youre heard, loud and clear.
-Content provided by Minfei Leng

PAGE 10

How To Design An in Building DAS Part 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How To Design An in Building DAS Part 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

How To Design An in Building DAS Part 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How to Properly Design

How to Properly Design

The most common type of the distribution network is a

Part II: The DAS Design

How to Properly Design an In-Building DAS

In order to make it easier to

higher loss branch,

5.3 dB respectively. If we had used a 3 dB splitter, the total losses would

floor and the cable

In summary, DAS design is a combination of node placement and simple

About the Author

-Content provided by Minfei Leng

How to Properly Design an In-Building DAS

You might also like