0% found this document useful (0 votes)
245 views6 pages

Boolean Near Rings and Weak Commutativity

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

CHAPTER III

BOOLEAN NEAR RINGS AND WEAK COMMUTATIVITY


3.1 Boolean Near-Rings
Definition: 3.1.1
A Near Ring R in which every element is an
idempotent is called Boolean Near Ring.
(i.e.) x2 = x , for each x N
Weak Commutativity
Lemma 1. If N is a boolean near-ring , then xy = xyx , for each x,y N.
Proof:
(since, x N)

xy = x2y
=x x y

(since, N is commutative)

=x y x

(since, Every Boolean Right Near


Ring R is weakly Commutative)

Therefore, xy = xyx , for each x, y N


Theorem 1. If N is a boolean near-ring, then abc = acb for each a,b,c N.
Proof. Let a,b,c N.
Then b(a - ac)c = b(ac ac2)
= b(ac ac)
= b(0).
Thus, [(a-ac)b(a-ac)]c = (a-ac)b(0)

Next,

=> (a-ac)bc = (a-ac)b(0)

(by Lemma 1)

=> abc-acb = ab(0) acb(0)

(Since cbc = cb)Eqn.1

c(a - ac)c = c(ac - ac)


= c(0)
=> c(a - ac) = c(0)

( by Lemma 1 )

=> bc(a - ac) = bc(0)


Again, by Lemma 1, bc(a - ac) = bc(a - ac)bc
we get bc(a - ac)bc = bc(0).

Now pre-multiplying both sides by a - ac


We obtain
[(a - ac)bc(a - ac)bc] = (a - ac)bc(0)
And this gives, by idempotency, that
(a - ac)bc = (a- ac)bc(0).
Again, using cbc = cb, we get,
abc - acb = abc(0) acb(0)..Eqn.2
From Eqn.1 & Eqn.2 we get
Abc(0) acb(0) = ab(0) acb(0)
=>abc(0) = ab(0)

for each a, b,c N

Hence, by using the result just obtained,


We have that ab(0) = aab(0)
= aa(0)
= a2(0)
= a(0)
Again from Eqn.1 we get
abc - acb = ab(0)-acb(0)
= a(0)-a(0)
=0
Therefore abc = acb for each a,b,c N.

for each a,b N

Theorem 2. Let N denote a boolean near-ring such that, if each of x,y N,


then there exists an e N such that ex = x and ey = y. Then N is a Boolean
Ring.
Proof: Let x

N.

Consider x and x + x .
By assumption, there exists an idempotent e

N such that

e x = x and e ( x + x ) = x + x.
Thus, x + x = e x + e x
= (e + e)x
= (e + e)2x
= [e(e + e) + e(e + e)]x
= e(e + e)x + e(e+e)x
= e(ex+ex)+e(ex+ex)
= e(x+x)+e(x+x)
= (x+x)+(x+x)
Hence, it follows that x + x = 0.
Therefore ( N , +) is an abelian group.
Now, let x , y N .
Then according to our assumption, there exists an idempotent f N
Such that f x = x and f y = y.
By Theorem 1, x y = ( f x ) y
= fxy
= fyx
= (fy)x
= yx.
(i.e.) xy= y x .
With the multiplication being commutative , it follows that N is a boolean ring.

Theorem 3. Every d.g. boolean near-ring N is a boolean ring.


Proof. Let N denote a d.g. boolean near-ring.
Suppose S is a multiplicative semigroup whose elements S generate ( N , + )
Satisfy s ( x + y ) = s x + s y for each x , y N .
It is easy to see that, for each s , s 1 , s 2 S and x N , s0 = 0, x0 = 0,
s + s = 0, and s1 s 2 = s2s1.
Hence s(x + x) = s x + s x
= ( s + s)x
= 0x
= 0.
Next, for x , y N ,
let y = s1 + s2 ++sn , where each s i S .
Then y(x + x) = (s1 + s2 ++sn)(x + x)
= s1(x + x)+s2(x+x,)+.+sn(x+x)
= 0.
Thus, by Lemma 1,
x + x = ( x + x)x
= ( x + x ) x ( x + x)
= (x + x)0
=0
That is, each non-zero element in ( N , +) is of order 2.
Hence ( N , +) is an abelian group.
Consequently, N is a ring since ( N , +) being abelian implies by an elementary
result that N is left distributive.
Therefore N is a boolean ring.

A special class of Boolean Near-Rings

Let R denote a boolean ring. Let each of A and B denote a subring of R


such that AB - {0} and suppose a b = 0 for each a A and b B . Take
N to be the set of all mappings: f : R > R such that, for each x R ,
f { x ) = a x+ b , where a e A and b e B . Then (N , , ) is a Boolean
near-ring where and denote, respectively, ordinary addition and composition
of mappings. Finally, (N, , ) is boolean since, for each x R, (//)(*) = /[/
(*)] = a{ax+b)+b = ax+ab+b - ax+Q+b = ax+b = /(*). It is this class of
boolean near-rings which we will characterize in the following manner.
Let A denote a boolean ring and let B denote an additive abelian group.
Consider the group direct sum A B of A and B. Define a multiplication in
A B by (a\ , b \ ) (02, >2) = (1 2 1 ) It can be verified directly
that A B forms a boolean right near-ring with commutative addition and
satisfies the identity (*-.k)0 = xy-yx. We will denote this boolean near-ring
by N(A, B).
Theorem 4.

Let N denote a boolean near-ring in which the addition is

commutative and suppose, for each x , yN , that


(*)

(jc - y)0 xy - yx.

Then there exist a boolean ring A and an abelian group B such that N =
N ( A , B).
Proof, let

A = {a N|<z0 = 0} and let B = {b e N|60 = b). Clearly, A and B are

additive subgroups of N . For each a\yaz A, we have by (*) that ai02~a2ai


= (ai-fl2)0 = ajO-^O = 0-0 = 0 and thus a\ai = aia\. Also, A is closed with
respect to multiplication since (01*22)0 = Zi(22O) = ajO = 0 for each
fl|,fl2 A and thus 2^2 A. Hence A is a boolean ring. Furthermore, A n
B = {0} and, from the definitions of A and B along with Theorem 1, ab =
abO = aOb = aO = 0, for each a A and b B.

Let ( f > : N N (A , b ) denote a mapping defined by <f>{jc) = (jc x0,jc0) for each x N. It is easy to see that <f> is additive. To see that <f> is
also multiplicative, let x\, X2 N. Using the identity (*), we obtain x\ (X2X2O) - (*2-*20)Xi = [ATi (JC2 JC20)]0 = ^10-(AT2-JC20)0 = X|0- JC20 + JC2O = JC|0.
Thus X \{ X 2 - JC2O) - X2X \ + JC2O = jciO and rearranging we obtain *1
{ x 2 - X2O) = X2X y + (x\ ~ *2)0 = *2*1 + *i*2 ~ *2*1 = *i*2- Also, by
Theorem 1, X1X2O = X1OX2 = *i0. Thus, <f>{x\)(f>{x2) = (x\ - XiO,XiO)
(a:2 - *20,*20) = ((X \ - Xi0)(*2 - *20),X \0 ) = (x i (x 2 - *20) - XiO(x2 *20),*i0) = (*i*2 - A"i0, jcjO) = { x \x z - *|JC20,*i*20) = <f>(xix2). Hence,
^ is a homomorphism. That <f> is injective is trivial.
Now, for each (a, b) e N (A , B ), let c = a + b . Then c O = { a + 6)0 = a0 +60
= 0 + 6 = 6 and c - c 0 = a + b - b = a. Thus 4>{c) = (c - cO, cO) = (a, b). This
shows that <f> is suijective. Therefore <f> is an isomorphism and
consequently N = N (A , B).

You might also like