Workers Participation in Management in I
Workers Participation in Management in I
Workers Participation in Management in I
HISTORY:
The idea of workers participation arose in Europe, where collective bargaining has
usually been at the branch or industry level; this often left a gap of employee
representation at the enterprise or plant level, which became filled by bodies such as
works councils, works committees, enterprise committees and so forth. Many
developing countries have also adopted legislative initiatives with a view to having
works councils or similar structures set up (e.g., Pakistan, Thailand, and Zimbabwe)
as a means of promoting labour-management cooperation. The relationship of these
bodies to trade unions and collective bargaining has been the subject of considerable
legislation and negotiation.
Workers Participation in Management is an essential ingredient of Industrial
democracy. The concept of WPM is based on Human Relations approach to
Management which brought about a new set of values to labour and management.
Traditionally the concept of Workers Participation in Management (WPM) refers to
participation of non-managerial employees in the decision-making process of the
organization. Workers participation is also known as labour participation or
employee participation in management. In Germany it is known as co-determination
while in Yugoslavia it is known as self-management. The International Labour
Organization has been encouraging member nations to promote the scheme of
Workers Participation in Management. Workers participation in management
implies mental and emotional involvement of workers in the management of
Enterprise.
II.
DEFINITIONS:
1. WORKERS PARTICIPATION:
III.
IV.
V.
FORMS OF PARTICIPATION:
Different forms of participation are discussed below:
Participation through Collective Bargaining: Collective bargaining results in
collective agreements which lay down certain rules and conditions of service in an
India. As they are consultative and advisory, neither the managements nor the
workers take them seriously.
Board Representation: The role of a worker representative in the board of
directors is essentially one of negotiating the workers interest with the other
members of the board. At times, this may result in tension and friction inside the
board room. The effectiveness of workers representative at the board depend upon
his ability to participate in decision-making, his knowledge of the company
affairs, his educational background, his level of understanding and also on the
number of worker representatives in the Board.
Participation through Workers Ownership of Enterprise: Social selfmanagement in Yugoslavia is an example of complete control of management by
workers through an elected board and workers council. Even in such a system,
there exist two distinct managerial and operative functions with different sets of
persons to perform them. Though workers have the option to influence all the
decisions taken at the top level, in actual practice, the board and the top
management team assume a fairly independent role in taking major policy
decisions for the enterprises, especially in economic matters.
Participation through Shop councils: Government of India on the 30th of
October 1975 announced a new scheme in WPM. In every Industrial
establishment employing 500 or more workmen, the employer shall constitute a
shop council. Shop council represents each department or a shop in a unit
consisting of an equal number of representatives from both employer and
employees. The employers representatives are nominated by the management and
consists of persons within the establishment. The workers representatives will be
from among the workers of the department or shop concerned. The total number of
employees
may
not
exceed
12.
Functions of Shop Councils:
1. Assist management in achieving monthly production targets.
2. Improve production and efficiency, including elimination of wastage of man
power.
3. Study absenteeism in the shop or department and recommend steps to reduce
it.
4. Suggest health, safety and welfare measures to be adopted for smooth
functioning of staff.
5. Look after physical conditions of working such as lighting, ventilation, noise
and dust. Ensure proper flow of adequate two way communication between
management and workers.
Financial participation: This method involves less consultations or even joint
decisions. Performance of the organization is linked to the performance of the
employee. The logic behind this is that if an employee has a financial stake in the
organization, he/she is likely to be more positively motivated and involved.
Some schemes of financial participation:
1. Profit-linked pay
2. Profit sharing and Employees Stock Option schemes.
3. Pension-fund participation.
Quality Circles and Total Quality Management: Quality circles and other
similar group activities were rapidly introduced in a large number of enterprises in
some Western European countries (e.g., the United Kingdom and France) at the
start of the 1980s and in the United States a little earlier. They built upon Quality
of Working Life (QWL) or Humanization of Work programmes that began in
the early 1970s. Their spread was considerably later in some other Western
countries (e.g., Germany) and still seems to be very limited in countries where
joint project groups are the predominant means of dealing with work organization,
such as Sweden. Quality circles were the most visible and easily transplantable
feature of Japanese human resource management. Quality circles are generally
expected to produce two types of effect: one is the enhancement of quality and
productivity and the other is the fostering of a sense of participation in workrelated decisions among workers, leading to increased job satisfaction and better
industrial relations.
B.
I.
The beginning towards WPM was made with the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,
which made Works Committees mandatory in industrial establishments employing
100 or more workers.The joint management councils were established in 1950 which
increased the labour participation in management.Since July 1975 the two-tier
participation called shop councils at shop level and Joint councils were
introduced.Workers participation in Management Billwas introduced in Parliament
in 1990.
The Industrial Policy Resolution adopted by the government in 1956 stated that there
should be some joint consultation to ensure industrial peace, and improve employeremployee relations.A study team was appointed in 1962 to report on the working of
joint councils and committees.
During the emergency of 1975-77, the interest in these schemes was revived by the
then Prime Minister by including Workers Participation in industry in the
governments 20-point program.
Now, Article 43-A reads: The State shall take steps, by suitable legislation, or in any
other way, to secure the participation of workers in the management of undertakings,
establishments or other organizations engaged in any industry. Thus, participative
management is a constitutional commitment in India.
And then, on May 30, 1990, the government introduced the Participation of Workers
in Management Bill in the Rajya Sabha.
The bill requires every industrial enterprise to constitute one or more `Shop-Floor
Councils at the shop floor level, and `Establishment Council at the establishment
level. These councils will have equal representation of employers and employees.
The bill also provides for penalties on individuals who contravene any provision of
the bill.
Refer for detail: Page 246 of Industrial Relations, Trade Unions and Labour Legislation
by P.R.N.Sinha, Indubala Sinha, and Seema Priyadarshini Shekhar.
II.
Category
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
Executives
1290
1390
1493
1614
1702
Supervisors
2844
2841
3249
3546
3621
Others
9657
10139
10824
11477
12218
Total
13791
14370
15566
16637
17541
The first Works Committee started functioning from 1967 and the third Works
Committee was formed in 1972 in accordance to the rules framed by the Tamil Nadu
government under the industrial disputes act, 1947.
Rules:
The tenure of the committees would be for a period of six years and one third of the
members should retire every two years. The Works Committee consists of one
Chairman, one Vice-Chairman, one Secretary, and a Joint Secretary, all appointed by
the committee members. In case the elected Chairman is from among the
management representatives, the Vice-Chairman must be from among the workers
representatives, and vice versa. Similar is the condition for the position of Secretary
and Joint Secretary.
For election purposes, the whole unit is divided into ten constituencies and one
representative from each constituency is included in the committee. The members of
the Works Committee are also nominated to such other committees as the Township
Committee, Staff Benefit Committee, Death Relief Fund Committee, Safety
Committee, etc. All these committees, combined together, work for the betterment of
the employees while channelizing their efforts for achieving growth and attaining
excellence in the unit.
The major issues taken up by the Works Committee are as follows:
Conditions of work such as ventilation, lighting, temperature and sanitation
including latrines and urinals.
Amenities like drinking water, canteens, dining rooms, creches, rest rooms,
and medical and health services.
Safety and accident prevention, occupational diseases and protective equipment.
Adjustment of festival and National Holidays.
Administration of welfare and fine funds.
Educational and recreational activities such as libraries, reading rooms, cinema
shows, sports, games, picnics, community welfare and celebrations.
Promotion of thrift and savings.
Implementation and review of decisions taken in the meetings of Works
Committee.
Shop Council
Structure:
There are 15 shop councils in the Tiruchi unit of which eight are major and seven are
minor. The shops where production is involved are considered as major and those in
non-production areas constitute minor shop councils. Workers' representatives in the
shop council are nominated by the participating unions on the basis of the percentage
of votes they have secured in the election to the Joint Committee.
Functions:
The shop councils deal with operational problems of all kinds some of which are listed
below:
Controlling wastage
Ensuring material economy and Proper storage of materials
Quality improvement
Absenteeism, reduction and redesigning of work
Attaining monthly targets for production
Review of cost reduction, inventory reduction, technological development,
productivity as well as utilization of capacity of critical machines.
Formulation of schemes for job redesign, group working, job enrichment and
evolving guide lines for implementation.
Any matter referred to by the plant council for consideration of the shop council.
Plant Council
Structure:
The Plant Council is responsible for the overall working of the plant and it discusses
matters which have unit wide repercussions. Workers' representatives are nominated
by the participating unions who have been elected to the Joint Committee.
Eight workers' representatives are nominated to the Plant Council. An equal number
of management representatives are also nominated to the council. The tenure of the
council is two years with effect from the date of the first meeting. The Plant Council
meets once in two months and all decisions are taken on the basis of consensus. Only
those issues which pertain to the entire plant or those which the shop councils could
not resolve or which fall beyond the purview of the shop councils are taken up for
discussion in the Plant Council meetings. The General Manager of the plant is the
Chairman of the Plant Council and one of the members acts as Secretary to the
Council.
Functions:
The major functions of the Plant Council are:
To review production targets for the plant as a whole keeping in tune with the
overall target set by the corporation.
To resolve inter-council problems that are referred to the council.
To provide suitable guidelines for reducing absenteeism.
To periodically review cost reduction schemes, including wastage reduction,
quality improvement, target achievement for production, inventory reduction, etc.
To develop information systems regarding site failures, mechanical defects,
rejection rates and overall performance of the plant.
Suggestion Scheme
A Suggestion Scheme has been in operation in the Tiruchi unit since 1964 with the
objective of ensuring greater involvement of the workers on matters of importance
regarding employee welfare as well as effective working of the organizations as a
whole. Under this scheme, there are 12 Area Committees and one Central Suggestion
committee. Employees and workmen at various levels are encouraged to put forward
their suggestions. Boxes for receiving suggestions have been placed in different
locations in the factory premises and good suggestions are awarded cash prizes.
Suggestions are received on various issues pertaining to safety, efficiency, industrial
relations, public relations, cost reduction, etc.
III.
Generally Trade Unions leaders who represent workers are also active members
of various political parties. While participating in management they tend to give
priority to political interests rather than the workers cause.
Schemes of workers participation have been initiated and sponsored by the
Government. However, there has been a lack of interest and initiative on the part
of both the trade unions and employers.
In India, labour laws regulate virtually all terms and conditions of employment at
the workplace. Workers do not feel the urge to participate in management, having
an innate feeling that they are born to serve and not to rule.
The focus has always been on participation at the higher levels, lower levels have
never been allowed to participate much in the decision-making in the
organizations.
The unwillingness of the employer to share powers with the workers
representatives, the disinterest of the workers and the perfunctory attitude of the
government towards participation in management act as stumbling blocks in the
way of promotion of participative management.
IV.
The process of employee participation in the workplace has traditionally taken place
in Sri Lanka through the formation of trade unions. In Sri Lanka, trade unions have
been
linked
with
the
struggle
for
independence.
The Industrial Disputes Act No. 43 of 1950 (ID Act) was introduced for the
prevention, investigation and settlement of industrial disputes, and is the corner stone
of labour administration in Sri Lanka.
ii
than those applicable to other workers in the same industry in that district. A
collective agreement when published becomes enforceable and is binding on the
parties unless it is repudiated as provided in the ID Act.
Democratic management;
Information sharing forums;
Joint labour-management training programmes;
Safety and health committees;
Quality circles;
Quality of work life programmes;
Employee participation teams other than quality circles;
Total quality management teams;
Team based work structures with a variety of responsibilities;
Gain-sharing and profit-sharing plans;
Employee ownership programmes;
Worker representation on corporate boards of directors;
Survey feedback;
Job enrichment or redesign initiatives;
Union-management quality of work life committees;
Mini-enterprise units;
Self-managing work teams (autonomous work groups, semi-autonomous
work groups, self-regulating work teams, or even simply work teams);
Site-based management;
Knowledge management programmes;
Business process re-engineering (but some do not consider this a
participative mechanism);
Open-book management;
Theory Z.
ENDNOTES:
The Industrial Disputes Act No. 43 of 1950 (ID Act) was introduced for the prevention, investigation and settlement of
industrial disputes, and is the corner stone of labour administration in Sri Lanka. It applies to all workers and employers in
the private sector, and is administered by the Commissioner General of Labour (CGL). An amendment to the ID Act in 1999 the
concept of unfair labour practice was established by statute, by making the non-recognition of a legitimate trade union by an
employer a penal offence. The amendment makes it an unfair labour practice for any employer to prevent a worker from becoming
a member of a legitimate trade union, or harassing a worker to withdraw from membership of a trade union; it is also an unfair
labour practice for the employer to refuse to bargain with a trade union with 40 per cent of workers in a workplace in its
membership.