Steel Ss41p Jis g3101

Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers Ltd.
Particle Accelerators
1975, Vol. 6, pp.123-129
Printed in the United Kingdom
DESIGN OF EARTHQUAKE-PROOF STRUCTURE FOR

KEK LINEAR ACCELERATOR TANK
S. INAGAKI, J. TANAKA, H. BABA, S. OKUMURA, S. IKEDA,t R. FUJITA,t
J. KISAKlt AND Y. IINOt
National Laboratory for High Energy Physics, Oho-machi, lsukuba-gun, Ibaraki-ken, Japan
(Received September 20, 1974)
In order to avoid the stress due to thermal expansion and to avoid resonance with an earthquake, the KEK proton
linear accelerator tank has as supports a so-called soft-structure.
In this paper we describe the design of the support, i.e. the idea of the structure, the calculation of the mechanical
features (the natural frequency, the endurable acceleration etc.) and experimental results with a brief comment on the
damping factor.
which can endure an acceleration of 0.5 gt in the

horizontal plane.
Secondly through Fourier-analysis of microtremors of the ground, the power spectra in the
KEK building sites were obtained. It was shown
that the natural frequency at the building site
ranges from 2.5 Hz to to Hz. 2 ,3t Therefore resonance will be avoided, if the natural frequency
of the supports is below 2 Hz.
1 INTRODUCTION
The KEKlinac tank is one cavity consisting of six
unit tanks and the total length is 15.5 m. Normally
the linac is operated at a temperature of(27 l)OC.
However, when the machine is shut down and the
air conditioning is stopped, the expansion or the
contraction for the whole length will amount to
several millimeters in a bad case. Further, taking
into account frequent earthquakes in Japan, one of
the authors (J. Tanaka) proposed to design an earthquake-proof structure for the KEK linac supports.
The degree of the damage due to quakes mainly
depends upon the acceleration of the ground and
the resonances of the machine with the vibration.
It also depends upon other unknown factors as the
velocity, the amplitude of the displacement and the
duration of the vibration. In the design of the support, we take the former two factors into consideration.
In Japan the earthquake intensity scale is classified into eight ranks and is called J.M.A. (Japan
Meteorological Agency) seismic scale. For a tremor
of the largest degree,.the acceleration of the ground
exceeds 400 cm/sec 2 (Ref. 1). It is characterized by
the following phenomena: destruction of more than
30 % of buildings, landslides, crumbling of mountain sides and. changes of geographical features
(dislocations, upheavals, subsidences etc.) in a wide
area. Therefore we intended to make supports
tMitsubishi Heavy Industry
Minato-ku, Nagoya-shi, Japan.
Company,
STRUCTURE OF THE SUPPORT
Figure 1 shows the whole view of the KEK linac

tank and Figure 2, the side view of the first unit
tank. It is around three tons in weight, and is
mounted on two supports. The support consists of
a steel plate and two preloaded U-shaped steel
springs (Figure 3). The former has the role of
spring action in the longitudinal direction and the
latter, the transverse direction.
The plate is 1.2 cm in thickness, 78 cm in height
and 75 cm in width, having a rectangular hole of
50 cm x 45 cm. The principle to determine the
dimensions .of the plate is as follows. First, the
height is uniquely determined from the beam line
t g stands for the acceleration of gravity.
The first and the second dominant mode are 5.89 Hz and
3.71 Hz respectively. In the general, the frequency of earthquake
in Japan lies between 2 and 20 Hz.
We use the term "longitudinal" in the sense of beam direction and "transverse", perpendicular to the beam direction in
the horizontal plane.
Oe-machi,
123
s.
124
INAGAKI et af.
and the diameter of the cavity. The thickness hand

the width b are determined to reduce the natural
frequency below 2 Hz, to endure longitudinal
acceleration of more than 0.5 g and to make the
buckling load larger than the weight of the tank.
The structure is shown in Figure 4. The spring
plate is indicated by CD. The height of the cavity
can be finely adjusted with four screws (J).t
The U -shaped spring is 3 cm in thickness,
3.2 cm in width and 47.4 cm in length. It is also
designed to have a natural frequency of 2 Hz. In
order to reduce the frictional force an assembly of
needle bearings and a guiding plate C@) is
inserted between the legs of the tank ~ and the
adjusting screws (J). A pair of mating blocks @
having a groove in the transverse direction is
attached to the legs and the upper end of the spring
plate. Each mating block has a pin hole (J), to
which each end of the U -shaped spring is fixed.
So as not to fail in exact repositioning, the Ushaped spring is pretensioned to 28 kgjmm 2 by the
FIGURE 1 Whole view of KEK linac tank.
t The method to set up the unit-tanks (and the drift tubes)

on the beam-line will be reported elsewhere. We merely mention
here that the tanks are well aligned if the screws can be rotated
with the effective up and down movement of 5 mm.
FIGURE 2 Side view of the first unit-tank.
125
EARTHQUAKE-PROOF LINAC TANK STRUCTURE
FIGURE 3 Structure of the Support I.
screws . This strength corresponds to a transverse acceleration of 0.2 g. The spring has only
leftward restoring force in the case of Figure 4;
spring action occurs for a stretching force which
exceeds the preset value, but does not for any compressive force owing to the clearance of a trackshaped hole . Therefore it can be said that for
the transverse direction, the support is a rigid
structure below the acceleration of 0.2 g, but becomes a soft structure above that value (Figure 5}.
3 PROPERTIES IN THE LONGITUDINAL
DIRECTION
As two guiding blocks are bolted on the upper end
of the support and- two anchor bolts are buried at
the lower end ofthe su.pport, we can take the bound..
ary condition as follows. The upper end of the
plate is free for displacement but restricted in
rotation, meanwhile the lower end is fixed both for
displacement and rotation. Let the x-axis be
FIGURE 4 Structure of the Support II.
Displacement
" ---- 0
-leftward
,"
,,
"
Q2g rightwardAcceleration
,"
/
FIGURE 5 Acceleration-displacement diagram for the transverse movement.
s.
126
INAGAKI et al.
y
FIG URE 6 Coordinate of a plate spring.
( YV2 -yJ
FIGURE 7 Flexible pillar model.
vertical and the Y-axis along the longitudinal

direction (Figure 6). Then
y= 0,
Fs = 0,
oY
-=0
ox
oY
-=0
ox
Then, Eq. (2) becomes

at x = 0
(1a)
at x = 1
(1b)
ay
3
(1':) = 0.
P -..!:. - Y
2
x=l
Y = y(x)cos(wt).
(7)
(2)
ay
= E1 -;-3 + P-,
ux
ax
(3)
where P is the weight of the tank.
(8)
the general solution of which is given
COs(~x) + C Sin(j~ x)
2
We consider the restoring force due to the deflection of the elastic plate. Let the mass on the
upper end be m, and assume the mass of the plate
be negligible. The bending moment exerting at any
point (x, Y) is due to the load P and the force of
inertia F (Figure 7), being expressed as follows.
FG - x) + p(i - y).
a
axy2 + Py = {2(1)
mw 2 - x + iP} ~,
y = C1
Natural Frequency
M =
-2
As the time variation is independent of the position

Y can be written as follows.
'
EI
Fs
)(aotY)
2
- x
From Eqs. (6) and (7), we get
a y2
ox
F s is given by
3.1
uX
+ m(1-
(6)
in which the displacement Y is a function of x and

t, and Fs means the shearing force. If we denote
Young's modulus by E and the geometrical
moment of inertia by 1, then the bending moment
M can be expressed as follows:
M = El
y
EI ~
mw
+ {P
(12- x) +21} ~.
(9)
Using the boundary condition (1), we can determine

C 1 and C 2 to get
~ (mw
-"2
P +1
2
y=
([P)
..j Ei
cos
(4)
where
(5)
{mwP
(I2 ) 21} ,.
+--~-x+-1':
(10)
127
Putting y = yzl2 at x = 1/2, we get the natural

frequency f
1
fP
j= 2nymi
j~f}tan(~.D - 1
The maximum bending stress (Jmax at an arbitrary

cross section of a beam is given as follows.
. (11)
(Jmax
(14)
where e is the maximum distance from the neutral

axis and Z, the modulus of section. It is given by
Taking It = 78 cm, E =-2.09 x 106 kg cm- 2 ,

P = 1.5 X 10 3 kg and I = 4.32 cm 4 t, we get
M
M
= T e = Z'
= 1.88 Hz.
If the denominator in Eq. (11) becomes infinite,

the natural frequency f goes to zero. The load Pc at
which this condition is satisfied is called the Euler's
critical buckling load; the lowest mode of which is
given by
(13)
bh 2
bh 3 /12
Z=e=hj2=6
(15)
The bending moment M takes the largest value at

x = 0 and x = 1, neglecting the second term in
Eq. (4). Then Eq. (14) becomes
3Fl
= bh 2
(Jmax
(16)
Using the minimum yield strengtht of SS41P,

= 25 kg/mm 2, we get
(Jmax
(Jmax3~ bh = 4.62
2
With the same values as those in the preceding

section, Pc is evaluated to be 1.47 x 104 kg.
Therefore the safety factor becomes 9.8.
3.2
Longitudinal Critical Force
Due to the vibration of the ground, a forced oscillation is induced to the tank. In this section, however,
we suppose a static model. At the initial time when
the ground moves in one direction suddenly, the
tank is left at the original position due to inertia.
We assume that the period of the vibration is long
enough and do not consider the subsequent reverse
movement of the ground. If the acceleration of the
ground is very large, the bending stress at some
cross section of the support exceeds the yield
strength of the material used. We call the force
corresponding to this acceleration the critical
force. The actual acceleration which the support
can endure will be much larger than that calculated
here, because the tensile strength is about two
times larger than the yield strength.
t Owing to the reinforcement and the installation of the

height-adjusting mechanism, I does not coincide with the real
height of the support.
t The geometrical moment of inertia is given by
bh 3
1=-.
12
(12)
The thickness h of the plate is 1.2 cm. But the width is 75 cm

having a rectangular hole of 45 cm (in width) x 50 cm (in
height). So we tentatively take b = 30 cm.
F =
102 kg,
which corresponds to a horizontal acceleration of

0.31 g.t It can easily be shown that the deflection
is 2.0 cm for this acceleration.
4
4.1
PROPERTIES IN THE TRANSVERSE

DIRECTION
Natural Frequency
We use a simple pendulum model for the calculation of natural frequency.
j=~ fk.
2n~m
(17)
Due to the sequence of two cantilevers in the

U-type blocks, the spring constant k is given
as follows (Figure 8):
k=
3E1'
Eb'h,3
"2 = 8f3.
(18)
t SS41P is rolled steel plate for general structure (JIS G3101).

The yield strength is more than 25 kg/mm 2 and the tensile
strength, 41 ~ 51 kg/mm 2
t If we use the tensile strength of 41 kgjmm 2 for (j max' the
endurable horizontal acceleration becomes 0.51 g.
For a cantilever the boundary condition is given as
follows.
dy
y = 0,
- = 0 atx = 0
(19a)
dx .?
Fs = 0,
M= 0
atx = l'
(19b)
s.
128
INAGAKI et aJ.
FIGURE 8
Coordinate of a U-shaped spring.
When a concentrated load F' is exerted on the one

end of a cantilever, the cross section of which is
rectangular, the maximum bending stress aritax is
given by Eq. (20).
6F'I'
uritax = llh'2
(20)
Corresponding to the pretensioned force F' = 0.2

my, we decided to make uritax = 28 kgjmm 2 ,
which is about half of the yield strength of S45C.t
Substituting f = 2 Hz into Eqs. (17), (18) and (20),
we get relations between h', l' and h'. Using h' = 3
cm for the thickness of the spring, we get h' = 3.2
cm and l' = 47.4 cm. Therefore the deflection b of
the spring, which we give, corresponding to the
initial pretension, is given by
b=
4.2
F'
k =
6.25 mm.
Transverse Critical Force
Just as in Sec. 3.3, the maximum transverse

acceleration can be obtained by substituting the
yield strength or the tensile strength for uritax
in Eq. (20). From this we get 0.36 g and 0.5 g
respectively.
5 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The natural frequency in the longitudinal direction
was measured for the first unit tank. A permanent
t S45C is a carbon steel Jor machine structure use (JIS
G4051). The yield strength and the tensile strength are more
than 50 kg/mm 2 and 70 kg/mo1 2 respectively.
FIGURE 9 Oscillation of the first unit-tank.
magnet was attached to the end flange, after the

completed unit tank had been placed in the correct
location. The oscillations of the magnet against
a Hall probe, which was fixed to the floor, generated
the signal voltage (Figure 9). The measured natural
frequency and the damping factor were 1.72 Hz
and 1.46 sec respectively. The former is 9.3 %
smaller than that calculated in Sec. 3.1, which
coincides rather well in spite of the rough estimation.
As we have lost the opportunity to get any
experimental result about the transverse- oscillation, since the alignment of the whole tanks and
drift tubes has been completed, we are going to
measure the frequency by monitoring real earthquakes.
In the design of earthquake-proof structure, it is
also necessary to make fast damping. We consider
that there is no problem for the transverse
structure because of the nonlinearjty of the righting
force. For the longitudinal structure there is no
intended device for damping. We hope that the
installation of twelve sputter-ion pumps, two rf
feeders and beam transport systems will serve as
dampers to some extent. However, we are also
investigating the possibility of an oil damper.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We express our thanks to Prof. T. Nishikawa and the staff of
the KEK linac group. The members of the linac group in the
Mitsubishi Heavy Industry Company were also very enthusiastic
in the design and the realization.

REFERENCES
1. A. Odaka, S. Nasu, M. Takeuchi, J. Sakurai and S. Tani,
Earthquake- and Wind-Proof Structure, Kashima Pub. Co.,
p. 24 (1972) (in Japanese).

2. T. Itoh, H. Watanabe and H. Yanohara, Measurement and
129
Analysis of the Oscillation at National Laboratory for High

Energy Physics, Research Reports of Shimizu Construction
Company, Oct. 20 (1972) (in Japanese).
3. S. Inagaki, J. Tanaka, H. Baba, S. Ikeda, R. Fujita, J. Kisaki,
and Y. lino, Earthquake-proof Structure of KEK Linear
Accelerator Tank, KEK PREPRINT-l (1974).

Steel Ss41p Jis g3101

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Steel Ss41p Jis g3101

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Steel Ss41p Jis g3101

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

How was the structure of the KEK linear accelerator tank support designed?

How was the structure of the KEK linear accelerator tank support designed?

What factors were considered in designing the natural frequency of the support?

What factors were considered in designing the natural frequency of the support?

Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers Ltd.

Printed in the United Kingdom

DESIGN OF EARTHQUAKE-PROOF STRUCTURE FOR

which can endure an acceleration of 0.5 gt in the

STRUCTURE OF THE SUPPORT

Figure 1 shows the whole view of the KEK linac

and the diameter of the cavity. The thickness hand

FIGURE 1 Whole view of KEK linac tank.

t The method to set up the unit-tanks (and the drift tubes)

FIGURE 2 Side view of the first unit-tank.

EARTHQUAKE-PROOF LINAC TANK STRUCTURE

FIGURE 3 Structure of the Support I.

FIGURE 4 Structure of the Support II.

FIGURE 5 Acceleration-displacement diagram for the transverse movement.

FIGURE 7 Flexible pillar model.

vertical and the Y-axis along the longitudinal

Then, Eq. (2) becomes

where P is the weight of the tank.

the general solution of which is given

As the time variation is independent of the position

From Eqs. (6) and (7), we get

in which the displacement Y is a function of x and

Using the boundary condition (1), we can determine

EARTHQUAKE-PROOF LINAC TANK STRUCTURE

Putting y = yzl2 at x = 1/2, we get the natural

The maximum bending stress (Jmax at an arbitrary

where e is the maximum distance from the neutral

Taking It = 78 cm, E =-2.09 x 106 kg cm- 2 ,

If the denominator in Eq. (11) becomes infinite,

The bending moment M takes the largest value at

Using the minimum yield strengtht of SS41P,

With the same values as those in the preceding

Longitudinal Critical Force

t Owing to the reinforcement and the installation of the

The thickness h of the plate is 1.2 cm. But the width is 75 cm

which corresponds to a horizontal acceleration of

PROPERTIES IN THE TRANSVERSE

We use a simple pendulum model for the calculation of natural frequency.

Due to the sequence of two cantilevers in the

t SS41P is rolled steel plate for general structure (JIS G3101).

Coordinate of a U-shaped spring.

When a concentrated load F' is exerted on the one

Corresponding to the pretensioned force F' = 0.2

Transverse Critical Force

Just as in Sec. 3.3, the maximum transverse

FIGURE 9 Oscillation of the first unit-tank.

magnet was attached to the end flange, after the

EARTHQUAKE-PROOF LINAC TANK STRUCTURE

p. 24 (1972) (in Japanese).

Analysis of the Oscillation at National Laboratory for High

You might also like