NCI Operations Manual June 28
NCI Operations Manual June 28
NCI Operations Manual June 28
INTRODUCTION
Over a decade ago, the National Convergence Initiative (NCI) was formulated as a common
framework for sustainable rural development and poverty reduction through the issuance of Joint
Memorandum Circular (JMC) No. 01 Series of 1999. This was signed jointly by the Department
of Agriculture (DA), Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) and the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (DENR) as the 3 leading government agencies in-charge of rural
development focusing on agriculture, agrarian reform and natural resources (AARNR). Nine pilot
convergence areas were implemented during this period, namely: 1) Cagayan Valley River
System 2) Central Luzon 3) Bicol River Basin System 4) Negros Island 5) Panay Island 6) Bohol
7) Zamboanga Peninsula 8) CARAGA 9) Davao del Norte/Oriental Mindoro where strategic
investment plans were prepared. However due to change in leadership in the 3 agencies, the
implementation was delayed.
Another Joint Memorandum Circular (JMC) No. 01 Series of 2004 was issued by a new set of
Department Secretaries to reactivate the NCI in line with the effort of the government to create a
bigger impact in the countryside. Specific convergence zones were identified in each of the
provinces under the nine pilot convergence sites to have more focus in the implementation of
said plans.TheGerman Technical Cooperation (GIZ) then teamed up with the DA, DAR and
DENR to align the GIZ rural development and natural resources management program with the
convergence strategy.
A year after, in 2005, the National Steering Committee earmarked the expansion of the NCI for
nationwide implementation in line with the Medium Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP)
for 2005-2010. This involved the development of 2 million hectares of new lands for agribusiness and the generation of 2 million jobs by 2010. The convergence strategy was considered
an appropriate platform to achieve GOAL 1 of theMTPDP.
Between 2008 and 2009, NCI broadened the reach of its convergence strategy by generating
agribusiness investment proposals for specific sites. The 1 st National Agri-Investment Forum was
organized in September 2009 to elicit interest and participation from the private sector on 17
agri-investment proposals developed by NCI. A positive outcome was noted with the interest
shown by various investors and agribusiness firms in pursuing the agri-investment proposals.
By the 1st quarter of 2010, the combined gains from the convergence initiative programs of DA,
DAR and DENR yielded 1.82 million hectares of land developed and the generation of 2.65
million jobs. Most of the reported gains were based on production areas rather than on actual
agri-business endeavours of the said areas.
The administration of President Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III continues to uphold the
commitment to countryside development as the linchpin for poverty reduction. While it will pursue
the agri-based investment proposals already in the pipeline, the current leadership will also
address the main concerns such as: 1) gaps/weaknesses in program implementation; 2) clear
mechanisms for harmonization among the 3 government agencies; 3) conflicting and overlapping
policies among the 3 agencies which affects implementation of convergence activities in the field;
1
4) clear financing scheme for convergence initiatives and 5) empowerment of the LGUs as
implementing arm of convergence initiatives on the local level.
The issuance of JMC No. 01 Series of 2010 by the new Department Secretaries of DA, DAR and
DENR added a new dimension to the convergence strategy through the adoption of the
watershed and ecosystem management approach as the intervention framework in the
convergence areas. This approach had been adopted by DENR in 1999 as basis in program
planning and implementation for watershed areas in all regions. This convergence strategy is
also known as the Ridge to Reef Approach. It is defined as a holistic, collaborative, multiple use
and sustainable management of all resources within the watershed. It takes into account the
human interventions in the forest and upland areas and its impact on lowland areas as well as
coastal and marine areas. The principle behind it is that ecosystems are inter-dependent and
that intervention in one ecosystem will impact other ecosystems.1
With poverty reduction as a primary goal of the government, the convergence initiative has a
defined constituency which are the small farmers (Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries and nonARBs), fisher folks and marginalized upland dwellers within areas covered by tenurial
instruments of DENR and the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP).
The convergence initiative will directly contribute to the attainment of outcomes on agriculture,
agrarian reform and natural resources sub-sector specifically in: 1) ensuring food security and
increased income; 2) enhancing access to land and other natural resources and in improving the
quality of the environment; and 3) developing the self-reliance of constituency and increased
resilience of their communities.
Specific objectives of the Convergence Initiatives are to: 1) facilitate the implementation of
different agencies to ensure that resources are maximized by achieving synergy and institutional
efficiency; 2) build partnership between and among the local communities, LGUs and
government agencies to ensure that all development interventions are based on actual needs
and aspirations of the community; 3) expand opportunities for agro-enterprise and agribusiness
development for its constituency; and 4) achieve spatial integration within different ecosystems to
ensure environmental integrity and sustainability.
To implement the convergence initiatives, multi-agency coordinative bodies will be established at
the national, regional, provincial and municipal levels composed of representatives from the DA,
DAR and the DENR with the Local Government Units as the integrating and converging force at
the local level. There is a NCI Steering Committee (NCISC) composed of the Secretaries of DA,
DAR, DENR, DILG and NEDA who shall act as the policy making body of the enhanced NCI.
They will approve the membership of the National Technical Working Group and the 4
Component Working Groups on Policy and Advocacy, Capacity Development, Agro-enterprise
Cluster and Agribusiness, and Knowledge Management. The NCI Steering Committee will be
supported by a National Convergence Initiative Secretariat (NCIS) composed of the Coordinators
of each working group as members. The NCIS shall work closely with the National Focal Person,
1 Adopted from the Policy Framework and Implementing Strategy for the Enhanced DADAR-DENR Convergence Initiative for Sustainable Rural Development.
2
the Chair of the different working groups and the agency Convergence Focal Persons. There will
be other supporting government line agencies that will be involved in the NCI implementation to
ensure complementation and alignment of enhanced NCI interventions. (See Annex A: Policy
Framework and Implementing Strategy for the Enhanced DA-DAR-DENR Convergence Initiative
for Sustainable Rural Development)
II.
A. Objectives
Through the past years, the experiences generated in implementing the convergence initiative
have shown differences and implementation gaps as experienced in the various Regions,
Provinces and Municipalities. Marked differences have emerged in the process flow in terms of
the various activities conducted, the time frame in conducting the activities and the forms and
tools used in analysing and selecting the convergence area and in developing the convergence
plans. Experiences from the national and the local levels provided a rich resource base for the
writing of this Operations Manual. It had become imperative to issue an Operations Manual to
capture these experiences and best practices, analyze these and identify a general process flow
that will systematize the implementation, clarify gaps and present tools for more efficient
convergence planning and effective implementation. With the adoption of the watershed and
ecosystem management approach as an added dimension in the Convergence strategy, the
Operations Manual will be a tool for implementers in operationalizing the JMC No. 01 Series of
2010. Specifically, the objectives of the Operations Manual are:
1. To systematize the process of planning and implementing the Convergence Initiative at the
national, regional, provincial, municipal and community levels of the various implementers
from the government agencies, local government units, peoples organizations and support
groups and institutions;
2. To serve as a guide in the synchronized and organized management of the various activities
from preparatory, planning and implementation phases; and
3. To reinforce the joint and diverging roles and responsibilities of the DA, DAR, DENR and the
Local Government in the planning, implementation and management of the convergence
initiatives.
The development of the Operations Manual typifies the essence of convergence initiative. It is a
collaborative work done by a multi-disciplinary and multi-agency team composed of members
from the National Convergence Initiative Technical Working Groups (NCITWG) and selected
members from the Regional and Provincial Technical Working Groups from Regions 5, 6, 8 and
10. The work was spearheaded by the Capacity Development Technical Working Group with
support from the National Convergence Initiative Secretariat. Presented below is the framework
in the development of the Operations Manual:
Policy and Implementation Framework and Guiding Principle
Figure 1 : Framework in Operations Manual Development
JMC No. 01, Series of 1999, JMC No. 01, Series of 2004 and
JMC No. 01, Series of 2010
Policy Framework and Implementation Strategy for the
Enhanced DA-DAR-DENR Convergence Initiative for
Sustainable Rural Development
Document
Future
Implementation to
enhance
future
Manual
Revision
Process Used
Implementation
Issues
Best Practices
III.
The general process flow in the implementation of the convergence initiative is divided into 11
major activities which fall within the 3 main Phases namely the Preparatory Phase, Planning
Phase and Implementation Phase. Activities of the convergence initiatives are implemented by
the multi-agency coordinative bodies established at the national, regional, provincial and
municipal levels composed of officials coming from DA, DAR and DENR and the Local
Government Units with support from other government line agencies. Presented in detail are the
11 major activities in the implementation of the Convergence Initiative: (See Figure 2)
Figure 2
GENERAL PROCESS FLOW IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONVERGENCE INITIATIVE
PREPARATORY
PHASE
PLANNING
PHASE
IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
M&E
MOBILIZATION OF
RCITWG AND PCITWG
(1)
FORMULATION OF
CONVERGENCE AREA
PROFILE : DATA
GATHERING &
VALIDATION
(5)
ORIENTATION
Issuance of JMC
No. 01 Series of
1999, 2004 and
2010
(2)
FORMULATION OF
CONVERGENCE AREA
DEV. PLAN (CADP)
(6)
Planning
Convergence Area
Development Plan
( 6)
SELECTION OF
CONVERGENCE
AREA
(3)
IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
OF:
CADP
POLICY &
ADVOCACY
AGROENTERPRISE &
AGRIBUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT
CAPACITY
DEVELOPMENT
KNOWLEDGE
M&E OF
PROGRESS OF
CADP
IMPLEMENTATION AND
COMPONENTS
(10)
IMPACT
ASSESSMENT ON
AARNR
OUTCOME
(11)
MANAGEMENT
LAUNCHING
(8)
FEEDBACK LOOP
PREPARATORY PHASE
A. MOBILIZATION OF THE REGIONAL AND
INITIATIVE TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
PROVINCIAL CONVERGENCE
The National Convergence Initiative (NCI), as a strategy for sustainable rural development, is a
work in progress. Hence, efforts will be exerted to ensure that convergence implementing
mechanisms and structures established at the local (sub-national) levels are working and
continue to be functional. The convergence structure at the regional level shall be organized as
proposed below.
Chairperson:
Co-Chairpersons:
Member:
The chairperson of the RCITWG shall be a convergence champion and shall be decided by and
among the Regional Directors of DA, DAR and DENR. Upon the finalization of the RCITWG
7
needed such as, but not limited to infrastructure, logistics, extension, inputs, lands, and
institutional development for the implementation of the NCI plans and programs.
The Chairperson of the PCITWG shall be agreed upon by the provincial members and shall be
a choice between the provincial head of DAR or of DENR. The Governor of the province shall
be the Co-Chairperson. The members of the PCITWG are the Provincial Environment and
Natural Resources Officer (PENRO), Provincial Agrarian Reform Officer (PARO), Provincial
Agriculture Officer (PAO), and Provincial Planning and Development Coordinator (PPDC).
The respective interface mechanisms shall be LGU-led with DA, DAR, and DENR providing
technical and operational support. Existing LGU mechanisms may be adopted to spearhead or
manage the convergence initiatives at the LGU level.
2. Topics:
Concept and Mechanics of the Enhanced National Convergence Initiatives (NCI) Strategy
Watershed and Ecosystem Management or Ridge-to-Reef Approach
Agro-Enterprise Cluster and Agribusiness Development
Criteria in Selecting the Convergence Sites
(Note:A soft copy of all presentation materials in CD format is enclosed at the back of this NCI
Operations Manual.)
3. Expected Outputs:
The expected outputs in conducting the Inter-Agency Orientation are to: a) forge an Agreement
among DA, DAR and DENR to adapt the NCI strategy; b) identify the long list of
municipalities/areas considered in convergence site selection; and c) develop a plan on how to
move forward with the various convergence initiative activities.
4. Participants:
The Orientation will be attended by the Provincial heads and other Provincial Government
officials namely: the Regional Director (RD) of DAR; Regional Executive Director (RED) and
Regional Technical Director (RTD) of DA and DENR; Assistant Regional Director for Operations
(ARDO) of DAR; technical staff of DA, DAR, DENR; Provincial Governor; Provincial Planning
Development Officer; Provincial Budget/Finance Officer; other staff from the Office of the
Governor; and the Municipal Mayors.
The PCITWG shall request all concerned LGUs that are part of the long list of potential
convergence areas, to submit the following information/data:
Table 1 : Initial Data Requirement
TYPE OF DATA
DATA SOURCE
PLGU
Maps
showing
geo-political
DENR
Provincial/Municipal Agricultural
Office
DAR through the Agrarian Reform
Community Monitoring and
Tracking System (ARC MTS)
NAMRIA
10
TYPE OF DATA
boundaries (province, municipalities
and barangays)
DATA SOURCE
LGU
The PCITWG shall evaluate all the nominated convergence areas using the MUST criterion.
Only those areas which passed the MUST criterion will be evaluated using the Prioritization
Criteria. This will result into the shortlist of selected convergence areas.
11
Should cut
across
various ecosystems or
a combination of at
least two ecosystems.
Should be located
within the 141 priority
watersheds
identified/proclaimed
by DENR (Annex B
contains the list of
Watershed Supporting
141 River Irrigation
System of the NIA)
Remarks
This is a must
criterion.
As
such, it will also
serve as prequalification
criteria such that
failure of the LGU
to comply with
this
parameter
will
give
the
PCITWG a signal
NOT to proceed
with
the
evaluation. Since,
this is a must
criterion,
no
weight is given.
PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA
2. Presence of key
production
zones and with
connectivity for
increased
productivity
and income
35%
12
Criteria/Parameter
Weight
Descriptor
Remarks
25%
4. Presence
of
development
oriented local
government
leaders
and
LGU alliances
20%
Local
government
leaders
are
development-oriented;
Proven track record in
implementing
or
supporting
rural
development
and
resource development
related projects;
High
level
of
participation/
involvement
of
provincial
and
municipal officials that
are willing to support
the CI;
Willingness of LGU to
provide
counterpart
funds/resources
5. Presence
of
NGOs,
POs,
private sector
and
an
academic/resea
rch community
20%
Criteria/Parameter
Weight
Descriptor
Remarks
expertise
and
resources
in
agricultural/agrarian
and
environmental
research
and
extension.
Potential partners with
proven track record in
implementing
or
supporting rural and
integrated
resource
development
related
projects
3.
3.1.
As previously mentioned, only those nominated convergence areas which passed criteria 1:
completeness of ecosystem zones, will proceed to this step, and will be evaluated using the
Prioritization Criteria.
In the assessment/shortlisting process, the PCITWG shall use the following rating system:
Table 3 : Rating System for the Final Selection of Convergence Area/s
Weight
Distributio
CRITERIA
n
1. Key production zones with connectivity for increased
35%
productivity and income
2. Combination of sites across major poverty groups
25%
3. Presence of development-oriented local government leaders
and LGU alliances
4. Presence of NGOs/POs, private sector and academic/research
community
TOTAL
20%
20%
100%
All selected convergence areas will be rated using the scale of 1- 5, where:
14
5 is the highest
1 is the lowest
1. Key production zones with connectivity for increased productivity and income (35%):
Rating
Existing & Available/Potential Area
Commodity Mix
for Production
Rating 1
Rating 2
Rating 3
Rating 4
Rating 5
With
more
commodities
than
Rating 2
Rating 3
Rating 4
Rating 5
Note: Annex C shows the latest list of poorest and most food poor provinces
15
(NSCB data)
Rating 3
Rating 4
Rating 5
4. Aside from DA, DAR and DENR, there is presence of NGOs/POs, private sector and
academic/research community that are willing to support the convergence initiative (20%)
Rating 1
With at least three GAs, POs, NGOs, private sector organizations
that are willing to support the convergence initiative
Rating 2
Rating 3
Rating 4
Rating 5
Example:
Criteria
1:
5 x 0.35 / 5 x 100 = 35
To get the overall rating, add all the scores corresponding to each of the four criteria.
17
5 x 0.35 / 5 x 100 = 35
Criteria
2:
4 x 0.25 / 5 x 100 = 20
Criteria
3:
4 x 0.20 / 5 x 100 = 16
Criteria
4:
3 x 0.20 / 5 x 100 = 12
Overall/total rating: 83
3.3.
Prioritization Scheme
Based on the overall/total rating obtained of the nominated convergence areas, the following
prioritization scheme is suggested:
Total Rating
80% and above
Priority 1
60% - 79%
Priority 2
50% - 59%
Priority 3
Below 50%
The interpretation of the overall/total rating of 83% for the Municipality of San Mateo means that it
will be part of Priority 1.
After completing the evaluation process for all nominated convergence sites, the PCITWG shall
submit the evaluation results to the RCITWG and recommend the shortlist of convergence areas
for final approval and confirmation. The PCITWG shall use the format shown in Annex E for this
purpose.
18
DATA SOURCE
LGU
LGU
LGU
LGU (Optional)
The pro-forma letter and the summary list of all confirmed convergence areas shown in Annexes
F&G shall be used.
CONVERGENCE
INITIATIVE
Officer (C/MENRO), Municipal Agrarian Reform Officer (MARO), Municipal Agriculture Officer
(MAO) and concerned City/Municipal Planning and Development Coordinator (C/MPDC).
The respective interface mechanisms shall be LGU-led with DA, DAR, and DENR providing
technical and operational support. Existing LGU mechanisms may be adopted to spearhead
or manage the convergence initiatives at the LGU level.
The over-all DA-DAR-DENR Convergence Initiative Structure is graphically presented in
Annex A of the Policy Framework and Implementing Strategy for the Enhanced DA-DARDENR Convergence Initiative for Sustainable Rural Development.
Objectives:
At the end of the activity, the participants shall have acquired an understanding on: a)
concept and mechanics of the NCI strategy; b) how to operationalize the Watershed and
Ecosystem Management or Ridge-to-Reef Approach; and c) the process of preparing the
Convergence Area Profile (CAP).
2.2.
Topics:
a. Concept and Mechanics of the Enhanced National Convergence Initiatives (NCI)
Strategy
b. Watershed and Ecosystem Management or Ridge-to-Reef Approach
c. Agro-Enterprise Cluster and Agribusiness Development
d. Data Requirements and Process Flow on the Preparation of the CAP.
(Note: A soft copy of all presentation materials in CD format is enclosed at the back of this
NCI Operations Manual.)
2.3.
Expected Outputs:
The expected outputs are the LGU commitment to pursue CI strategy and the plan on how to
come up with the Convergence Area Profile (CAP)
2.4.
Participants:
20
The participants of the Orientation are the Municipal Mayor, Municipal Planning and
Development Officer (MPDO), Municipal Budget/Finance Officer, MAO, MARO, CENRO,
other LGU officials, Agricultural Technicians, MPDO staff, DAR Development Facilitator, and
Barangay Captains.
PLANNING PHASE
E.
After identifying the convergence area, data gathering of primary and secondary data, field
verification and ocular inspection will be conducted. This will be undertaken by the PCITWG
together with the MCITWGs within the convergence area. As a result of all the data gathered,
a Convergence Area Profile (CAP) will be prepared, using the format in Annex H.
The CAP is the systematic presentation of all the primary and secondary data gathered and
the result of the field validation and ocular inspection conducted on the convergence area
with supporting maps. It will contain the following data:
1. Situation of the watershed and condition of ecosystem (DENR Report)
2. Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) which contains the long list of commodities
produced in the area
3. Socio-economic conditions (gender and Indigenous People disaggregated demographic
data and population spread)
4. Existing policies, laws applicable and specific to the area (NIPAS, reservation, LGC,
Fisheries Code, CBFM, IPRA, customary laws-IKSPs)
5. Institutional arrangements (geo-political situationer of the Barangays, Municipalities,
Province covered)
6. Relevant cultural and religious practices
7. Current investment and agribusiness situation (existing commodities, production,
processing and marketing system)
8. Municipal and Provincial Physical Framework Plan (geographical location, physical,
biological, social, infrastructure)
9. SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis of the various
ecosystems (forest, upland, grassland, lowland/urban, coastal and marine) within the
convergence area
10. Maps (from NAMRIA and other sources): geo-political boundaries, topography, slope,
existing land use, soil profile, infrastructure, hazard map, etc.
2. Convergence Area Profile Analysis
Based on identified needs of the convergence area, the necessary inputs, activities and
interventions are identified. These should be in support of the goals of the comprehensive
21
provincial and municipal development plans and must contribute to the protection of the
environment, the management of the ecosystem and the development of new lands for
agribusiness.
Data analysis is the result of the spatial integration of all the data gathered combining and
overlaying these in the maps to arrive at a better understanding on the existing situation of
the watershed in terms of land use, institutional presence (LGUs, GOs, NGOs, private
groups, POs), socio-economic condition of the population, population spread, current
investment and agribusiness situation and issues and constraints that may affect the
implementation of the Plans that will be formulated. The analysis will result in the
identification of the necessary interventions to protect the environment, manage the
ecosystem effectively and develop the agro-enterprise and agribusiness potential of the
convergence area using the combined resources of the LGUs, the three (3) lead agencies
(DA, DAR and DENR), other support groups and institutions and the private sector investors.
The Convergence Area Profile analysis will result in the following:
1. Providing the physical and infrastructure requirements to develop the area such as
farm-to-market roads, irrigation and post-harvest facilities, and other infrastructure
that will support the protection of the watershed and the management of the
ecosystem;
2. Identifying activities on environment protection and ecosystem management; and
3. Providing the cluster commodities and investment requirements that can be
implemented within the convergence area which were identified based on the value
chain analysis (VCA) and market study.
F.
1. Preparing the Road Map for the Crafting of the Convergence Area Development
Plan
The Convergence Area Development Plan (CADP) is a comprehensive plan which
addresses the management of the watershed and the ecosystem in a holistic and
sustainable manner. This will be done through the implementation of interventions and
activities that will promote sustainable management of all resources within the
convergence area. The CADP seeks to:
identify interventions and activities that will be implemented within the convergence
area in order to manage the watershed and ecosystems and develop the
agribusiness potential without adversely affecting the watershed and the ecosystems;
demonstrate the complementation and integration of services to be provided by the
DA, DAR and DENR with the Local Government Units (LGUs) and concerned NGOs,
Private Institutions, and Research Centers;
22
The formulation of the CADP is the outcome of the joint analysis made by the LGUs
together with DA, DAR and DENR on the present condition of the ecosystem, institutional
capacities, socio-economic condition, population spread and characteristics, sociocultural practices, current land use practices, issues and constraints of the convergence
site. All the relevant data and maps concerning the Convergence Area are presented in a
Profile Format, which was prepared by the MCITWG in Annex H. The data in the Profile
are analyzed to determine the needs and requirements of the convergence area. This
becomes the basis in formulating the Convergence Area Development Plan.
Presented in Figure 3 is an illustration of the process from data gathering to validation,
formulation of CAP, analysis and the formulation of the Convergence Area Development
Plan (CADP):
23
Figure 3
Process in Preparing the Convergence Area Profile and Convergence Area Development Plan
Data Gathering, Field Validation Activities
Convergence Area Profile (CAP)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
CAP ANALYSIS
VIII.
IX.
Executive Summary
Introduction/Background/Rationale
Regional/Provincial Context (CLUP, PPFP)
Vision-Mission Statement
Goals and Objectives
Convergence Area Profile
Development Framework Plan
A. Spatial Strategy
B. Spatial Integration
C. Institutional Integration
D. Programs and Projects
Plan Implementation
Expected Benefits
24
The Convergence Area Development Plan (CADP) will be formulated based on the
analysis of the Convergence Area Profile and will be guided by the existing issuances of
the DA, DAR and DENR mentioned as follows.
DAR Memorandum Circular No. 13 Series 2009 Operational Directives for the
Development of ARC Clusters
Executive Summary
The Executive Summary should provide a concise presentation of the key
components of the plan. It should clearly describe the goals/purposes of the plan
as well as the principles underlying its preparation and duration/plan period. It
should highlight the plans framework for development, the strategies, the
programs/projects to be implemented and the resource requirements/costs,
benefits to be derived and the prospective funding sources. The proposed plan
implementation, covering organizational structure and monitoring and evaluation
should likewise be described in this section.
II. Introduction/Background/Rationale
This section should clarify that the plan covers only the specific convergence area
targeted for development, which just forms part of the development plan of the
25
entire province and an input to the regional development plan. It should briefly
discuss the plans relevance to the provincial, regional and national development
thrusts and program. It should specify the time frame for the plan.
It should explain how the document is organized including a short description of
its contents.
The Rationale should answer the questions Why is there a need to formulate a
Convergence Area Development Plan? What are the major reasons for doing so?
This may be answered by introducing the enhanced convergence strategy
elaborated under JMC No. 1 series 2010, its objectives and intended impact for
the rural sector.
It should also include a short description of the planning approach and
methodology used.
III. Regional/Provincial Context
To put the plan in its proper context, the general socio-economic and ecological
situation as well as the overall development directions at the regional and
provincial levels is relevant. This section should focus on key development
indicators described in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP), the Regional
Development Plans and the Provincial Physical Framework Plan (PPFP) where
the proposed development strategies and interventions in the convergence area
are expected to contribute.
IV. Vision-Mission Statement
State the vision and mission statements for the long ( 25 years) and medium-term
(5 years) period.
V. Goals and Objectives
State the goals and objectives (general and specific) of the plan. What would be
the contributions of the plan to the overall objectives and targets of the
region/province?
Spatial Strategy
The spatial strategy should show in a map the location and specific role/function
of the different convergence areas/municipalities in relation to the overall direction
of the province/ region. It should also illustrate the ecological zones, eg. coastal
and marine, lowland, upland and forest areas and their inter-linkages.
B)
Spatial Integration
This section should outline the management strategies to be adopted:
Water Management
Management of Vulnerable areas
Allocation of Best Land Uses
- Management of Forest and Upland Ecosystem
- Management of Lowland and Urban (urbanizing) Ecosystem
- Management of Freshwater/Coastal or Marine Ecosystem
The agribusiness potential in each ecosystem should be identified.
C)
Institutional Integration
This section should describe how the different institutions and network of
institutions could converge their services in support of the strategies/interventions
and work together towards the development of the convergence areas. The
following may be discussed:
D)
LGU-alliances
Network of POs
number of seedlings) cost estimates and time frame for each of the proposed
project.
The funding requirements should be presented to reflect the total requirement for
the duration of the plan, broken down by year and by proposed funding source.
In addition to the different components and programs/projects, other support
interventions could be identified e.g. Policy and Advocacy, Capacity Development,
Agro enterprise and Agribusiness Development and Knowledge Management, as
necessary.
VIII.
Plan Implementation
A) Organization and Management Structure
This section should answer the questions - Who will implement the plan? What
will be the composition of the structure? What will be the role/ expected
contributions of each organization? Are present capabilities sufficient to match
future responsibilities? What measures should be taken to augment capabilities?
What will be the relevant post-implementation structure of the program?
The organizational and management structure of the implementation of the plan
should be presented.
1. Monitoring and Evaluation
This section should answer the questions How will the program be monitored?
Who will monitor and what mode and methods of monitoring will be adopted?
2. Schedule of Major Activities
Prepare a timetable of activities, preferably a Gantt Chart of major activities.
B) Expected Benefits
In addition to productivity and income benefits, the social soundness of the
investment should be adequately discussed. The evaluation should take into
account the groups or sectors to be benefited by the program investment, on the
one hand, and which would be adversely affected on the other. The acceptability
of the program to the recipient communities and neighboring areas should be
taken into consideration. The unquantifiable social benefits should likewise be
included, e.g. increased political awareness, gender awareness etc.
A section on the likely environmental effects of the proposed investment should be
included and appropriate mitigation measures should be included where adverse
effects are likely to be created.
28
3.
Concept and mechanics of the Enhanced National Convergence Initiatives (NCI) Strategy
Ridge-to-Reef Approach
Agro-enterprise Cluster and Agribusiness Development
The expected outputs will be the following:
1) LGU commitment to pursue CI strategy;
2) Long list of crops/commodities to be considered in agro-enterprise cluster and
agribusiness development and corresponding profile; and
3) Plan on how to move forward (especially on how to generate the necessary
data required by the PCITWG)
The profile of identified commodities should establish the expanse of production in
terms of hectares/area planted and available and potential market. The impact of
climate change will also be considered in all aspects in planning and selection of sites
and cluster commodities.
40%
2. Outreach
20%
20%
4. Complementarity
20%
100%
5 is the highest
1 is the lowest
Rating
1
Rating
2
Rating
3
Rating
4
Rating
31
Rating 1
Rating 2
Rating 3
Rating 4
Rating 5
Presence of Farmers/Organized
Groups that are Engaged in
Production of Chosen
Commodity
No farmers'/organized groups'
that are willing to engage in
production of chosen commodity
Presence of farmers'/organized
group' but are hesitant to engage
in production of chosen
commodity
Presence of at least one
farmers'/organized group that is
willing to engage and has
previous experience in producing
chosen commodity
Presence of at least one
farmers'/organized group that is
willing to engage and has
previous experience in producing
chosen commodity
Presence of at least one
successful farmers'/organized
group that is engaged in the
production of chosen commodity
with market linkages
Rating 3
Rating 4
Presence/adequacy of
extension
services
(e.g. training services;
business
advisory
services;
demonstration
services; information;
education,
communication support
services through trimedia) 5%
Rating 1
No
physical
infrastructure is
present;
only
informal
credit
sources
are
available
No readily
available or very
limited source of
raw/planting
materials
Appropriate
technology is
not readily
available
No extension services
are locally available
Rating 2
Physical
infrastructure
present is
limited;
only
informal
sources of
Raw/planting
materials are
sourced from
nearby
municipalities/ar
eas
Appropriate
technology is
available from
nearby
municipalities/
areas
33
credit is
available
Rating 3
Any one
of the
abovementione
d physical
infrastructure is
present;
at least
one
formal
credit
source is
available
Raw/planting
materials are
readily available
on-site but on
certain months
only
Rating 4
Any two
of the
abovementione
d physical
infrastructure are
present;
at least
two formal
credit
sources
are
available
Raw/planting
materials are
available within
the area year
round
Rating 5
Adequate
physical
infrastructure such
as roads,
bridges,
irrigation
system is
present;
at least
Raw/planting
materials are
available within
the area year
round, with some
surplus available
for sale
A group of
skilled LGU
agricultural
technicians
regularly visits
the area to
provide
adequate
appropriate
technology;
functional
processing
facilities are
available in
nearby
municipalities/
areas
A pool of trained
paratechnicians is
available to
provide a menu
of appropriate
technology;
functional
processing
facilities are
34
three
formal
credit
sources
are
available
available on-site
c. Computation of Rating:
1) How to compute the overall rating score per commodity:
To get the overall rating, add all the scores corresponding to each of the four
criteria
5 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 15
Criteria 3:
5 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 15
Criteria 4:
3 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 9
Criteria 5:
5 x 0.35 / 5 x 100 = 35
Criteria 6:
3 x 0.10 / 5 x 100 = 6
Overall rating 90
4 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 12
Criteria 3:
4 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 12
Criteria 4:
3 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 9
Criteria 5:
5 x 0.35 / 5 x 100 = 10
Criteria 6:
5 x 0.10 / 5 x 100 = 6
Overall rating 82
35
3 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 9
Criteria 3:
4 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 12
Criteria 4:
3 x 0.15 / 5 x 100 = 9
Criteria 5:
4 x 0.35 / 5 x 100 = 28
Criteria 6:
3 x 0.10 / 5 x 100 = 6
Overall rating 70
Priority 2
50% - 69%
Priority 3
Below 50%
Given the examples above, rice is part of Priority 1; while mango and dairy products are
part of Priority 2.
f.
To encourage the participation of the private sector and attract private investors and other
possible development partners, a Regional Investment Forum will be conducted annually
or as deemed necessary. Prepared investment plans that need external investments will
be presented in the Regional Convergence Investment Forum.
A National Investment Forum will also be held annually. Investment proposals not picked
up by investors in the Regional Investment Forum will be again presented in this forum.
requirement that cannot be accommodated by the regular programs will be packaged into
a proposal for funding through foreign grants and other external assistance.
Meeting/s will be held between the Reviewing Team and the Planning Team to
present and discuss the content of the CADP and assess its feasibility and
consistency with the Municipal, Provincial and Regional Development Plans
and to identify future bottlenecks in the implementation.
2. Field Validation
Field validation will be conducted by the Reviewing Team to verify the actual
situation on the ground and to discuss the CADP with the existing groups and
potential beneficiaries. This will also determine the existing and potential
issues and impediments in the implementation of the plan.
Field Validation Report will be prepared and will be used in the deliberation of
the Reviewing Team.
3. Result of Evaluation
Based on the results of the review and evaluation done through meetings and
field validation, the Reviewing Team will officially inform the Planning Team on
its decision regarding the approval of the CADP. This will be done through an
38
Official Letter with attachment of the Minutes of the meetings and Field
Validation Report.
The result of the evaluation may require further action by the Planning Team to
comply with the issues raised by the Reviewing Team. In this case, approval of
the CADP will be conditional pending the compliance of the Planning Team on
the issues raised by the Reviewing Team.
4. Final Approval
The final approval of the CADP will be given by the Reviewing Team after a
thorough review process. This will be communicated through an Official Letter
signifying the approval of the CADP.
The approved CADP will be endorsed to the RCITWG and NCITWG for fund
programming and necessary support.
Upon receipt of the approved CADP, the NCITWG will assess the plan for
completeness and consistency with the specific plans of the concerned
government agencies and groups involved and with the over-all national plan
on Convergence Initiatives.
If the CADP is found in order, the NCITWG will inform the RCITWG of its
confirmation and approval.
The approval of CADP will signify that the convergence area is ready for the
Launching Activity. (See Figure 4: Review and Approval Process of CADP)
GO BACK
MCITWG
TO #
1
PREPARES CADP
(1)
SUBMITS CADP
(2)
NOT
CONSISTEN
PCITWG
REVIEWS CADP
(3)
RECOMMENDATION
BASED ON ISSUES
IDENTIFIEDTABLE
AND
CONDUCTS
CONSISTENCY
REVIEW WITH
RECOMMENDS
PROVINCIAL
(4) PLANS
APPROVAL
(6)
FIELD VALIDATION
?(7) CONSISTE
(5)
GO BACK
TO # 3
PROCESS OF CADP
RCITWG
NCITWG
REVIEWS CADP
FOR CONSISTENCY
WITH REGIONAL
PLANS AND FUND
PROGRAMMING &
SUPPORT
(8)
RECOMMENDS
APPROVAL
?
NOT
(9))
CONSISTEN
T
REVIEWS CADP
FOR CONSISTENCY
WITH NATIONAL
PLANS, FUND
PROGRAMMING &
SUPPORT
(10)
CONSISTE
39
RCITWG (DA,DAR,DENR)
Provincial Planning and Development Officer (PPDO)
Provincial Agriculture Officer (PAO)
Provincial Agrarian Reform Officer (PARO)
Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Officer
(PENRO)
Community Environment and Natural Resources Officer
(CENRO)
Mayor/s or Representative
Municipal Planning and Development Officer (MPDO)
LGU-Environment and Natural Resources Officer (ENRO)
Municipal Agrarian Reform Officer (MARO)
Selected Civil Society Organizations (CSO) and Peoples
Organization (PO) representatives
Other concerned offices and partners
b. Process :
Planning sessions shall include identification of activities for the launching, including
budget requirement, committee tasks, areas where complementation of activities and
resources should be focused.
The Regional Convergence Initiative Technical Working Group (RCITWG) shall lead in
the planning and coordinating the preparations for the launching activity with specific
assigned tasks to the PCITWG and MCITWG:
40
Suggested working committees for the actual launching are provided below. Committees
may be combined depending on the dynamics within the LGUs, availability of staff
support and other factors.
c. Major Activities:
1) Creation of the management and planning teams and/or specific committees
2) Identification of key stakeholders who will attend the launching
3) Inter-agency meetings and consultations, orientation and levelling-off
meetings
d. Output :Program for Local Convergence Area Launching or Program of Activities
2.
Actual Launching
41
The Regional Convergence Initiative Technical Working Group (RCITWG) shall lead in the
conduct of the launching activity with specific assigned tasks to the PCITWG, MCITWG and
the specific committees:
The Technical Committee is responsible in the preparation of the necessary technical and
legal documents and materials such as:
a. Project profiles, project briefs, flyers about the CADP
b. Presentation materials on CI and CADP
c. Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) or Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) which
contain the following information:
mission, purpose, scope, terms of
understanding, signatures of concerned parties and witnesses
d. Tokens of recognition/appreciation
e. Land titles for distribution
f.
42
Activity
Office Responsible
Suggested Guests
and Participants :
Invocation
National Anthem
Welcome Remarks
Host LGU
Background on the
Convergence Initiative
Presentation
of
Development Plan
DA-DAR-DENR NCI/RCITWG
Convergence
O
ffi
c
e
of
Area PCITWG
Commitment of Support
Responses
Governor/
Congressional
District Representative
MOU/MOA Signing
RCITWG/PCITWG
Press Conference
RCITWG
the President
NCI Steering Committee - DA,DAR,DENR
NCI TWG Members DA, DAR, DENR
Governor
Senate/Congressional District Representative
Mayors
NEDA/Regional Development Council (RDC)
Other NGAs (DTI, DOH, DOLE, DSWD etc)
Development partners operating in the area
Other offices and partners (POs) from the concerned LGUs
Representatives from local media
IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
There are 4 major activities under the implementation phase which will be presented in this
Chapter. It will start with the discussion on the implementation of the CADP, then the 4
Components which support the implementation,theMonitoring and Evaluation and lastly the
Impact Assessment.
I.1.
a.
44
The MCITWG/Implementing Team shall hold its office in a strategic and centrally
located area/office accessible to the team members.
Other modalities may be explored for more effective implementation of CADP projects
and activities.
Options in setting up the Coordinating and Management Offices
Option 1: Regional Project Management Office (PMO) to be established/based at
office of RCITWG Chair
Option 2 : Provincial PMO to be established/based at office of PCITWG Chair
Other options that were gathered from the Provincial level data gathering are:
1) Project Management / Coordinating Office to be formed in a strategic
area within the convergence cluster
2) Creation of a Council or LGU Alliance of Convergence Area
b. Roles and Responsibilities of Management/Implementing Unit
The management office/implementing unit shall have the following specific duties and
responsibilities:
1) Assist the LGUs in the preparation of project proposals
2) Conduct site validation and preliminary investigation of proposed
projects
3) Secure clearances, endorsements and other necessary documents
pertaining to the implementation of projects approved under the
initiative
4) Submit regular program of activities and accomplishment reports to
the MCITWG, PCITWG and other offices when necessary
5) Monitor the implementation of projects
6) Submit physical and financial status of accomplishment
7) Provide overall management and supervision of the approved projects
8) Coordinate with concerned agencies and institutions to resolve issues
and problems arising during implementation of projects
9) Establish and maintain database of projects and activities for all
components (Policy and Advocacy, Agro-enterprise, Capacity
Development) based on Knowledge Management components
recommended principles and systems
10) Performs other tasks assigned by the MCITWG and PCITWG.
Mechanisms to integrate and coordinate interventions for the CADP shall be put in
place by the RCITWG and PCITWG to ensure inter-phasing, consistency and
sustainability.
Regular planning, coordination and assessment activities shall be conducted to
identify implementation gaps, issues and concerns to support the implementation
plan. A complete documentation of concerns per component shall be required for
immediate action of concerned working group. Concerns specific to certain agencies
shall be endorsed to the concerned agency.
TWG Focal Persons at all levels (Annex A: Policy Framework - NCI Organizational
Structure) shall act as Heads of Secretariat which will coordinate the conduct of
meetings,
provide
administrative
and
logistical
support,
document
meetings/workshops and maintain effective and efficient data management systems.
c.1.
Municipal level coordination for the CADP shall be undertaken through the
MCITWG. Implementation problems and issues shall be threshed out during the
MCITWG meetings.
Mechanisms to integrate and coordinate concerns/issues of each component
shall be consolidated by the Implementing Team. These shall be processed by
the PCITWG and RCITWG.
Coordination meetings at the municipal level shall be held weekly or as
necessary as determined by the MCITWG.
c.2.
Provincial level coordination for the CADP shall be undertaken through the
PCITWG. Implementation problems and issues shall be threshed out during the
PCITWG meetings. Coordination meetings at the Provincial Level shall be held
twice a month or as necessary as determined by the PCITWG.
c.3.
Regional level coordination for the CADP shall be undertaken through the
RCITWG. Implementation problems and issues shall be threshed out during the
RCITWG meetings. Coordination meetings at the Regional Level shall be held
monthly or as necessary as determined by the RCITWG.
c.4.
National level coordination for the NCI and CADP shall be undertaken through
the NCI Steering Committee, Component TWGs and NCI Secretariat.
Implementation problems and issues raised during provincial and regional
coordination meetings shall be threshed out and resolved at the national level.
46
The Steering Committee shall meet at least twice a year; the TWG once every
quarter, and the NCI Secretariat as necessary.
The NCI Secretariat shall coordinate with oversight agencies (NEDA, DBM, PMS,
etc) regarding submission of regular and special reports to be required by such
agencies.
The Planning Offices of DA, DAR and DENR shall ensure that NCI plans and
targets including those under CADPs are incorporated in agency Work and
Financial Plans (WFP).
Accomplishment in agency implemented (counterpart) projects within the CADPs
should also be incorporated in periodic agency accomplishment reports.
2. Annual CADP Review and Planning
Annual review and planning workshop to be held every December/January aims to
review the overall project annual accomplishment vis--vis planned targets to determine
efficiency of project implementation and discuss major strategies and issues that affect
the implementation of projects under the CADP. Planning for the succeeding shall be
undertaken in the same workshop.
Before the cluster-wide review and planning workshop, each LGU shall conduct its own
assessment and planning workshop to review their plans and accomplishments with
respect to the overall CADP plans and targets.
3. Financial Aspect
Based on the NCI guiding principles (Joint MC 1, S. 2010), funds necessary to carry out
the implementation of the enhanced Convergence Initiative shall be taken from the
available funds of DA, DAR and DENR. Other sources of funds such as grants,
donations, and other forms of assistance from donor agencies and other public or private
entities may be tapped and facilitated by NCI-TWG subject to regular auditing guidelines
and procedures. Cost-sharing or counter parting schemes among NGAs and LGUs will
be encouraged to support the implementation of the enhanced CI.
Funds for the convergence initiative shall form part of the work and financial plan (WFP)
of each department to effectively and efficiently carry out convergence activities.
These department WFPs are outputs of planning and budgeting process established and
standardized across government offices. They are submitted to DBM and incorporated
in the National Expenditure Program (NEP) and General Appropriations Act (GAA).
Processing and downloading of agency funds from Central to field offices shall consider
the governments existing accounting and auditing procedures.
I. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF 4 COMPONENTS
47
There are four Components that will provide support and guidance in the implementation of
the Convergence Area Development Plan (CADP). These components are (1) Policy and
Advocacy, (2) Agro-Enterprise and Agribusiness Development, (3) Capacity Development
and (4) Knowledge Management. These components perform an equally important role in the
attainment of the goals and objectives of the convergence initiatives by reinforcing and
enhancing the implementation of CADP. The processes involved in the implementation of
these components are described below:
1. Policy and Advocacy Component
In the implementation of JMC No. 01 Series of 2010, the Policy and Advocacy Component
will ensure that there are no conflicting, overlapping or unclear policies. This component will
address policy concerns through policy reforms in the context of formulating and amending
policy issuances, resolution of overarching cross-sectoral policy issues and the advocacy for
legislation or other instruments leading to institutional and operational efficiencies and
stakeholder participation under the convergence strategy. In order to operationalize the
processes involved in addressing conflicting, overlapping or unclear policies the following
activities will be implemented all throughout the implementation of the Convergence Area
Development Plan. (See Annex K: Matrix on Policy and Advocacy Component2)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
2.
clusters, due consideration will be given to the environment and ecological integrity of the
agro-enterprise cluster. Hence, models will be developed to ensure that the nature and type
of agro-enterprises will be congruent and in harmony with the ecosystem. Presented below
are the objectives and the process of operationalizing the agro-enterprise and agribusiness
activities.4
a. Objectives
Generally, this component aims to contribute in promoting sustainable rural development
through convergence.
Specifically, it aims to:
2)
3)
4)
5)
tool for the small farmer-producers and agribusiness entrepreneurs to identify the
key activities within the firm, which form the value chain for the organization/agrobusiness enterprise and have the potential of a sustainable competitive advantage.
The competitive advantage of an organisation lies in its ability to perform crucial
activities along the value chain better than its competitors. Understanding how
industries in which SMEs participation can become more competitive requires both
systematic and systemic analysis of the factors affecting the performance of the
firms in the value chain and the relationships among these firms.
3) Set the Selection Criteria
Selection cluster commodities and farmer cooperatives/organizations who will be
selected as partner implementers and who will manage the operation of the
projects and facilities that will be established under this CI component shall be
done in accordance with the selection criteria that will be set and agreed prior to
actual implementation.
4) Implement Counter-parting Scheme
To foster project ownership, counter-parting will likewise be adopted. Partner
implementers will be required to put up equity (cash or in kind) equivalent to the
corresponding percentage based on the income classification of the municipality.
Partner implementing coops/farmers organizations will likewise be required to
provide counterpart particularly the working capital for the 1 st three months of
operation. To ensure allocation of LGU equity, a Sangguniang Bayan (SB)
resolution will be required from participating LGUs. For the cooperatives and
farmers organizations, a Board Resolution will be required.
The Capacity Development Component will ensure that the implementing agencies (DA-DAR
and DENR) and other involved agencies, groups and institutions have a shared appreciation
and understanding of convergence and the common framework for sustainable rural
development. To efficiently deliver the necessary NCI interventions and activities at the
national, regional, provincial, municipal and community levels require capacity development
interventions such as training, education as well as institutional development. The process in
implementing the capacity development intervention is presented as follows: (See Annex L :
50
Process Flow for Capacity Development Component5 and Annex M: Proposed List of
Indicative Training Program)
Phase 1 : Strengthening the partnership and/or establishment of new network with relevant
stakeholders in the Convergence Initiative (CI) sites.
4. Knowledge Management
The function of the Knowledge Management Component is to ensure that the NCI programs,
projects and initiatives are implemented and monitored in an efficient and effective manner.
It will likewise ensure that innovations are documented, shared and disseminated for possible
adoption, expansion and scaling-up. The following are the key activities that will be
implemented under this Component: (See Annex O : Matrix on Knowledge Management
Component6 )
a. Information and Database Management (IDM)
5Source : Write-up of the Capacity Development Working Group
6 Source: Write-up of Knowledge Management Component Working Group
51
A Convergence Initiative Database System shall be designed and developed jointly by the
Information Technology Groups (ITG) of the three agencies (DA, DAR & DENR). The system
will be installed at the provincial, regional and central units of the agencies to allow
generation of information at their respective levels. The central database will be maintained
at the DA which shall officially provide information and reports to the oversight agencies. It
shall as well provide and facilitate the necessary access to the different users.
The IDM will facilitate the development and management of Convergence Initiative Database
System and shall include but not limited to the following data;
Write down your questions before the interview and give them to the
person(s) being interviewed, if possible
Decide beforehand how you want to document the information you
gather
Tell the person being interviewed the purpose and how you will use what
they tell you
2. Panel of Experts
52
This method is used to get the collective observations and opinions of the
best of the breed.
3. Observations
Direct observation of work performance is an excellent means of gathering
data. These are usually done in conjunction with another data gathering
method that is used to fill in the gaps and answer some questions.
53
Data entry and initial processing shall be done at the provincial level. Information
generated at the provincial level shall be submitted electronically to the regional
and national level for consolidation, processing and analysis.
1.
Training/Orientation
Preparation for training/orientation will be done by KM-TWG. The processes
to be done are the following;
2.
f.
Information Dissemination
The objective of the information dissemination is to ensure the sharing and circulation of
information to all NCI stakeholders.
a)
Clarify project aims, objectives, values and activities
b)
Clarify the target groups
c)
Identify outputs and outcomes
d)
Set performance indicators
e)
Set frequency of monitoring
f) Design M&E form or Logical Framework for monitoring.
h.
5) Visit the area for validation with CO and RO staff with contractor to collect
data/interview.
6) Report writing, review and finalize
7) Store in the Database System
8) Package/Disseminate information thru fora, trainings and presentation for
adoption.
57
Purpose
(1.) Ensured food
security and increased
income
Means of
Verification
Terminal and
Impact
Assessment
Reports
Household income of
constituency increased
Important
Assumption
Annual
Reports,
58
(3.) Self-reliance of
constituency and
increase resilience of
their communities.
Output
(a) Policy and
Advocacy
Midterm
Reports
Analysis of
existing data
and statistics
Cooperation
workshops
(Mutual
assessment of
key
stakeholders)
Focused
Group
Discussions
Surveys
Interviews
Monthly and
Quarterly
Reports
Cooperation
workshops
(Mutual
assessment of
key
stakeholders)
Focused
Group
Discussions
Surveys
Interviews
59
(b) Agro-enterprise
Cluster and
Agribusiness
Development
(c) Capacity
Development
(d) Knowledge
Management
Field Validation
Cooperation
workshops
(Mutual
assessment of
key
stakeholders)
Focused
Group
Discussions
Surveys
Interviews
Field Validation
Cooperation
workshops
(Mutual
assessment of
key
stakeholders)
Focused
Group
Discussions
Surveys
Interviews
Field Validation
Cooperation
workshops
(Mutual
assessment of
key
stakeholders)
Focused
Group
Discussions
Surveys
Interviews
60
Secondary data such as reports, previous studies can be used in setting up the Logframe as
well as survey instruments, key informant interviews and focus group discussions. The
Logframe must be presented to the stakeholders for validation. The development of a
Logframe may be started at the Local Convergence Agro- Enterprise Cluster (LCAEC)
development workshops (regional level).
It is necessary to link the logical framework to the NCI implementation plan, which indicates the
targets based from the logical framework. As seen in Figure 6, the inputs and outputs can be
presented in a detailed manner, indicating the indicators and its target during the first month,
and so on.
61
Output
Code
months, through electronic mail and a hard copy to be sent to the NCI TWG concerned which
they will review and process the report and be submitted to the KM TWG for consolidation.
The monitoring form for the Initial Gains Evaluation will be dependent on the submitted
Progress Monitoring and Evaluation reports.
64
K. IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The impact assessment provides an in-depth analysis of the results of the entire project.
Looking back at the logframe, the impact assessment will answer whether or not the long-term
goals of the project were achieved. The impact assessment aims to evaluate the extent of the
results of the project and to determine whether or not the project was able to achieve its ultimate
goals based on in-depth analyses of the results of the project.
Impact assessment should be done at two levelsRegional and National. At the regional level,
impact assessment should be done at their respective convergence areas. As for the National
level, the assessment should collate all the evaluations from the Regions to provide sole report
on the Impact Assessment of the NCI. The Impact Assessment Reports should contain the
following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
65
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX A
ANNEX B
ANNEX C
66
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
TABLE 1
TABLE 2
TABLE 3
TABLE 4
TABLE 5
TABLE 6
TABLE 7
TABLE 8
TABLE 9
TABLE 10
TABLE 11
Title
Initial Data Requirement
The Must and Prioritization Criteria
Rating system for the Final Selection of Convergence Area
Additional Data, Information and Documents
Criteria for Prioritization of Commodities
Criteria for Market Demand
Criteria for Outreach
Criteria for National Priority Ranking
Criteria for Complementarity
Suggested program of Activities During the Launching
NCI Logical Framework
Page
10
12
14
19
30
31
32
32
33
43
60
List of Figures
Number
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
Title
Framework in the Operations Manual Development
General Process Flow in the Implementation of National
Convergence Initiative
Process in Preparing the Convergence Area Profile and
Convergence Area Development Plan
Review and Approval Process of CADP
Logical Framework Matrix
Linking the LogFrame to the Implementation Plan
The Four Types of Monitoring and Evaluation
Page
4
6
24
40
62
62
63
Attachment
Orientation Material
67
ANNEXES
68
ANNEX A
I.
BACKGROUND
The National Convergence Initiative (NCI) was created through Joint Memorandum Circular 01,
series of 1999, signed by the Secretaries of the Department of Agriculture (DA), Department of
Agrarian Reform (DAR), and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), and
duly approved by the President. It aims to develop and operationalize a common framework for
sustainable rural development (SRD) that will facilitate the convergence of the resources of the three
agencies to maximize the impact on countryside development. The underlying principle is that
complementation of agency initiatives within a defined area under a common intervention strategy
will maximize impact, compared to a situation where these agencies would work independently of
each other.
The convergence initiative promotes a framework of sustainable agriculture and rural development
which integrates the people, their economy and their environment. Moreover, this strategy would
optimize resources, create substantial effect in the short-term, and make possible model-building
across ecosystems, production systems, and rural poverty sectors and small producers in the longterm. The three lead rural development agencies will spearhead the completion of such development
tasks and lay down policy environment that encourages the active participation of the private sector,
non-government agencies and civil society organizations, the LGUs, academe, and other government
agencies based on the interest of their respective stakeholders.
Following an agreed set of criteria, the three agencies jointly identified nine convergence sites.
These were: Cagayan Valley River System, Central Luzon, and Bicol River Basin System in Luzon;
Negros Island, Panay Island, and Bohol in Visayas; and Zamboanga Peninsula, CARAGA, and
Davao del Norte/Oriental in Mindanao. Pilot convergence initiatives were developed in these sites.
Strategic investment plans were subsequently formulated for each of the convergence zones to
initiate operationalization of the NCI; however changes in leadership in each of the agencies delayed
the implementation of said plans.
In 2004, Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2004 was issued by a new set of department
Secretaries to reactivate the NCI in line with the governments efforts to create a bigger impact in the
countryside. Specific convergence zones were identified in each of the provinces under the nine pilot
convergence sites to have more focus in the implementation of the NCI. Consequently, The German
Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and the three agencies agreed to align the GTZ rural development and
natural resources management program with the convergence strategy.
69
In 2005, the National Steering Committee decided to expand the scope of the NCI from the priority
convergence sites to nationwide implementation in line with Goal 1 targets under the MTPDP (20052010), particularly to develop two million hectares of new lands for agribusiness and generate two
million jobs by 2010. The convergence strategy was deemed an appropriate platform to achieve Goal
1 of the MTPDP. It will particularly focus on: (a) sharing of expertise and information; (b)
collaboration and complementation of projects; (c) realigning limited resources; and (d)
reconfiguring agency activities to more focused interventions in identified project sites. Five batches
of convergence planning workshops were conducted from April to June 2005 to come up with
provincial action plans for convergence implementation. The plans were geared towards the
achievement of the over-all MTPDP target of 2.05 million hectares developed and 2.65 million jobs
generated. This was followed by a National Strategic Planning Workshop in August 2005 which
defined a clear structure and implementing mechanisms to ensure attainment of the targets.
The respective agencies provided regular reports to the NCI Secretariat on their accomplishments for
hectares developed and jobs generated. Most of the reported accomplishments were based on
production areas and not necessarily agribusiness engagements covering the said areas. In 2008, NCI
stepped-up its efforts to further enhance the convergence strategy by generating agribusiness
investment proposals for specific convergence sites. The 1 st National Agri-Investment Forum was
conducted in November 2009 to drum-up interest from the private sector on 17 agri-investment
proposals developed through the NCI. Some of these proposals are currently being pursued by
various investors and agri-business firms.
As of the first quarter of 2010, NCI has reported that combined efforts of DA, DAR, and DENR
yielded 1.82 million hectares of lands developed representing 89% of the 2.05 million hectares
MTPDP target. This translates to 2.65 million jobs generated or 92% of the MTPDP target of 2.87
million jobs. As indicated earlier, most of the reported accomplishments cover only production areas
under the different programs of DA, DAR and DENR. The agri-investment proposals are still in the
pipeline and these are expected to yield higher value agri-production and jobs.
At this point, there is a need to revisit and enhance the National Convergence Initiative for
Sustainable Rural Development. The administration of President Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III
remains committed to ensuring countryside development as the strategy for poverty reduction. The
enhanced NCI will sustain the agribusiness investment engagements that have been initiated,
particularly those already in the pipeline. It will likewise address the weaknesses and gaps that were
experienced during implementation. Clear mechanisms for harmonization and complementation
among the three agencies should be laid-out as there was a tendency for each agency to concentrate
on its own programs even in convergence areas. Corollary to this is the need to address the conflicting
and overlapping policies among the three agencies, which hamper the implementation of programs
and projects on the ground. There is likewise a need to set a clear financing scheme for convergence
initiatives, particularly on which areas will require regular funds from the agencies and those that
70
would need to be financed by the NCI. The LGUs would have to be given a more pro-active role in
identifying and implementing convergence initiatives at the local level.
II.
72
There is a need to ensure that the identification and selection of convergence areas will be aligned
with the objectives of the NCI as well as conforms to the watershed and ecosystem management
approach. The following criteria shall guide the selection of convergence agro-enterprise cluster:
1. Completeness of ecosystem zones.The convergence sites should cut across the various
ecosystems or should be a combination of two or more ecosystems;
2. Key production zone and with connectivity for increased productivity and income.The
convergence sites should be current key production areas or with potential to substantially
expand and scale-up production. As such, the area may transform from mono-cropping to
integrated, multi-cropping or high value farming system. In terms of connectivity, the key
production zone may be linked with surrounding areas for allied industries/services or for
backward linkages;
3. Combination of sites across major poverty groups. The convergence sites must cover a
significant number of small farmers/agricultural workers including potential and current
ARB, fisherfolks, indigenous peoples, and rural women;
4. Presence of development-oriented local government leaders and LGU alliances.The
convergence sites should have LGUs and LCEs (Local Chief Executives) that share a
common perspective in rural development and are willing to support the convergence
initiative;
5. Presence of NGOs, POs, private sector and academic/research community.The convergence
sites should have active POs and/or NGOs that are willing to support the convergence
initiative. Presence of private/business and academic/research institutions who are willing to
partner within the convergence framework shall be an advantage.
IV.
GOAL (IMPACT)
The National Convergence Initiative is a strategy to enhance the implementation of rural development
initiatives particularly those which would benefit from the complementation of resources of the three
agencies. It will likewise address and resolve policy and jurisdictional gaps that impede the effective
and efficient implementation of the programs and projects of different agencies.
Thus the enhanced NCI shall contribute to the over-all national pursuit of inclusive growth, as
articulated in the Medium Term Philippine Development Plan (CY 2011-2016), particularly those
relating to the rural development sector.
Inclusive growth means growth that is rapid enough to matter: sustained growth that creates jobs,
draws the vast majority into the economic and social mainstream, and continuously reduces mass
poverty.
73
a confluence of
For the rural development sector, the long-term development goals are poverty eradication (poverty
reduction in the medium term) and sustainable rural development.
V.
PURPOSE (OUTCOMES)
The enhanced NCI shall contribute to the rural development sector outcomes, particularly that of
agriculture, agrarian reform, and natural resources (AARNR subsector).
The rural development outcomes can be viewed from the perspective of breaking out from the
perennial condition of poverty, inequity and lagging human development. Bulk of the poor remains
to be in the rural areas. These are largely the focus and defined constituency of the national
convergence initiatives.
Hence, the primary outcome is on food security and increased incomes within the context of
improving and maintaining the quality of the ecosystem for sustainable rural development which is
one of the ultimate goals (together with poverty eradication) of the rural development sector. This
implies enhancing the role of agriculture as provider of environmental services.
Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to
sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active
and healthy life. (World Food Summit 1996).
Rural growth or increasing per capita income in the rural areas lead to poverty reduction and
eradication (in the long term) which again is one of the goals of rural development.
There is also the recognition that there are abundant resources in rural areas. However, there is a
highly inequitable distribution of such resources. There are key gaps in access to land and other
natural resources and this constrains the productive potentials of the rural population. There is a need
to secure the property rights or tenurial status to agricultural land, forest and coastal areas. Access to
resources by the rural poor can also be viewed from the context of spatial integration. Inclusive
growth shall also mean putting investments (specifically capital or physical investments) in the rural
areas. This is to maximize the use of, and have a better share of the benefits from the resources.
Hence, enhancing access to land and other natural resources is an important outcome in rural
development.
The access to resources and physical investment should be coupled with investment in human
resources for sustained and broadbased growth. Such investment in human resources shall redound
to self-reliance and increase resilience of the constituency and their communities: which is another
dimension of sustainable rural development. Hence, in totality, rural development outcomes address
the imperative of growth with equity or the national pursuit of inclusive growth.
74
The AARNR outcomes are specific to the agriculture, agrarian reform, and natural resources subsector. The outcomes where the specific convergence initiatives can directly contribute are:
1. Ensured food security and increased income
2. Enhanced access to land (and other natural resources) and improved quality of the
environment
3. Self-reliance of constituency and increase resilience of their communities
Some of the parameters to measure the above outcomes are:
Household income of constituency increased above the poverty line
Food staples (rice, white corn and other starchy food) available at reasonable prices at all
times
o Decrease in food subsistence incidence (% of population)
o Increase in rice self-sufficiency ratio (%)
o Stable average inflation rates among basic food commodities (%)
Improved conservation, protection and rehabilitation of natural resources
o Forest cover increased by _____ hectares
o Increase in no. of adaptors (and area in ha.) of natural farming system and other
environment-friendly farm practices
o No. and area of abandoned, underutilized and unproductive fishponds reverted back to
mangroves
o Complete the delineation and local ordinance of _______municipal waters
The Convergence Initiative will contribute to the achievement of the above-stated outcomes through
three main avenues:
75
On the basis of the above, convergence intermediate process outcomes (to show that there is
convergence) would include:
Planning
Identified common focused constituency and area
Harmonized and synchronized planning at all levels (municipal, provincial, regional and
national)
Formulated and agreed among key Rural Development (RD) players on
Convergence Area Development Plan (with Agro-enterprise Cluster Plan as lead
component)
Agreed funding commitment from Key RD players/other stakeholders
Financing
Complementation of resources (financial and manpower)
Mobilization of and increased in investments from other institutions (specifically from the
private sector: private-public partnership)
Implementation
More timely and synchronized delivery of services ( with reference to above agreed
Convergence Area Development Plan)
Developed and established institutional arrangement for management and implementation
of projects
76
VI.
COMPONENTS (OUTPUTS)
The concrete outputs of the enhance NCI are those that will directly contribute to the
achievement of the objectives or outcomes enumerated above. The outputs can be grouped
into four components: (a) Policy and Advocacy, (b) Agro-enterprise Cluster and Agribusiness
Development, (c) Capacity Development, and (d) Knowledge Management. These
components are mutually-reinforcing and are equally important in ensuring that the objectives
are achieved.
1. Policy and Advocacy
The over-riding concerns in implementing rural development initiatives, particularly through the
convergence approach, are emerging policy requisites and the harmonization of previously issued
policies which are deemed conflicting, overlapping, or unclear. Such policies cut across land
administration, regulatory frameworks, operational strategies and jurisdictional boundaries. The
component is envisaged to address policy concerns through policy reforms in the context of
formulation and amendment of policy issuances, resolution of overarching cross-sectoral policy
issues and the advocacy for legislation or other instruments leading to institutional and
operational efficiencies and stakeholder participation under the convergence strategy.
The following are the key output indicators under this component:
a. Formulated and amended policies related to convergence under the rural development sector;
b. Legal instruments, resolutions or agreements by and among government agencies as regards
the harmonization and resolution of conflicting policy issues and concerns in the
implementation of laws and policies on rural development;
c. Policies expanded or improved to address gaps
d. Advocacy networks for policy reforms established.
2. Agro-enterprise Cluster and Agribusiness Development
The component shall address the issue on poverty and employment generation. There is a need to
expand economic opportunities in the rural areas by increasing agri-productivity and diversifying
agricultural production. The NCI will facilitate enterprise development and agribusiness within
the convergence sites.
77
3. Capacity Development
There is a need to ensure that the three agencies have a shared appreciation and understanding of
convergence and the common framework for sustainable rural development. At the same time,
the delivery of NCI interventions by the key stakeholders at different levels would require
capacity development interventions such as training and education as well as institutional
development.
Key interventions under each of the components will be anchored on the particular outputs
that have been earlier identified.
1. Policy and Advocacy
A key task under the component is the formulation of requisite policies and the amendment of
conflicting and overlapping laws and policies that are under the ambit of the three lead agencies
and/or other related agencies and offices. Addressing emerging policy imperatives and the
resolution of conflicting or overlapping policy concerns are expected to result in efficiencies in
implementing rural development programs and projects under the convergence strategy.
Stakeholder consultation and information sharing shall be pursued under the advocacies for
legislation and other endeavors towards improving rural development. Supporting the policy
requirements of the other NCI components and other cross-cutting policy and advocacy related
concerns shall be facilitated through the convergence policy processes and mechanism managed
under this component. The policy issues and concerns (PINCs) identified or proposed by the
NCI components shall essentially be drawn from operational requisites or bottlenecks
encountered in the course of the implementation of programs and projects under NCI.
Public hearings, roundtable discussions and review by technical experts may be conducted to
ensure that resulting policies are sound and would adequately resolve the issue and problems. For
those that can be addressed administratively, the department heads shall issue enabling
orders,clarificatory issuances and joint resolutions. For those that require enactment of laws or
legislation, the leadership of the three agencies shall advocate/recommend legislative action to be
taken by Congress.
2. Agro-Enterprise Cluster and AgribusinessDevelopment
The key intervention under this component is the establishment of agro-enterprise clusters in all
provinces. These clusters will be the focus of agribusiness initiatives based on the potential of the
areas. In selecting the agro-enterprise clusters, due consideration will be given to the
environment and ecological integrity of the convergence agro-enterprise cluster. Hence, models
will be developed to ensure that the nature and type of agro-enterprises will be congruent and in
harmony with the ecosystem. Convergence agro-enterprise clusters with environmentally critical
areas would require higher level of protection and less extractive production processes (e.g.,
ecotourism) compared to convergence agro-enterprise clusters which are generally composed of
productive lowland areas. Either way, there is a need to adopt natural resource management or
sustainable development approaches in planning and implementing the agro-enterprise clusters.
The following is an initial listing of potential activities in convergence agro-enterprise clusters:
Coastal and Marine Ecosystem
79
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Lowland Ecosystems
a. Commercial plantation of high value commercial crops and vegetables
b. Livestock/poultry
c. Rice/corn/grain production
d. Diversified contour farming system
e. Organized backyard farming
f. Agro-ecotourism
g. Biomass and biogas (from agricultural wastes)
h. Streambank stabilization
i. Responsible and regulated small-scale mining operations
Upland Ecosystem
a. Commercial fruit/forest tree farming
b. Livestock/halal/pasture/dairying
a. Reforestation / Assisted Natural Regeneration
c. Agroforestry
d. Agro-aqua-silvipastoral
e. Diversified farming system
f. Biomass/biofuels/biogas production from farm waste
g. Slope/streambanks stabilization
h. Responsible and regulated small-scale mining operations
i. Special Land Uses pertaining to specific requirement of the convergence plan
Forest Ecosystem
a. Reforestation / Assisted Natural Regeneration
b. Slope/streambanks stabilization
c. Ecotourism
d. Biodiversity conservation
e. Climate mitigation / carbon sink
f. Responsible and regulated small-scale mining operations
g. Watershed Conservation/Protection Measures
To support the development and establishment of the convergenceagro-enterprise clusters, the
National Convergence Initiative shall facilitate the access to and the provision of appropriate
interventions across the agro-enterprise or agribusiness value chain that shall bring about the
most benefits to the constituency. Such interventions may include financing, market
development, and those related to capacity development .
80
Financing support shall include access to credit facilities that would provide the necessary capital
for different types of requirements. Market development support includes the provision of market
information particularly on market outlets and prices. NCI will likewise facilitate market
linkages and the development of marketing networks. Capacity development will focus on
effective market oriented advisory services, demand driven skills development, desired essential
skills and knowledge, and values formation/education towards sustainable agriculture. NCI will
assist in facilitating fiscal and other specific incentives applicable under existing laws, rules and
regulations for investors interested to invest in convergence agro-enterprise clusters through
private-public partnership (PPP).
3. Capacity Development
Interventions under capacity development will include orientation and planning sessions among
the three agencies at the national and regional levels. This will ensure a common understanding
and appreciation of the convergence initiatives. This will be followed by the formulation of a
comprehensive capacity development plan for implementers and other key stakeholders involved
in the convergence initiative. The plan will include the design of assessment instrument and
training needs assessment, identification of trainings and other capability development
interventions and the resources required, and the conduct of capacity building intervention.
4. Knowledge Management
Key interventions under the component include the design, installation and operationalization of a
monitoring system for the NCI. This system will track the progress of NCI implementation
across the different components. It will likewise maintain a database for basic information on
key NCI initiatives.
Process documentation of innovative approaches will likewise be done to come up with lessons
and experiences which may be a jump-off point for scaling-up and replication. Knowledge
sharing will be done through learning exchanges and forums to showcase innovative and
successful approaches in NCI implementation. Publication and dissemination of these
approaches and experiences will be done to reach a broader population.
All assessment and planning sessions for the enhanced NCI will be under the knowledge
management component. Annual reports and performance reports will likewise be under the
component.
The Logframe for the Convergence Initiative is presented as Annex B.
VIII. IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
81
5. Consult with other concerned national government agencies, stakeholders, and partner
agencies on policies and major programs related to sustainable rural development.
The NTWG National Focal Person shall convene the members of the respective Working
Groups to elect amongst them the Chairperson for each Working Group. The Chairperson of
each Working Group shall then designate or appoint a Coordinator from their respective
agency.
83
Each agency shall likewise designate a Convergence Focal Person who shall be responsible
for the coordination and management of the convergence program in their respective agency
(national and field levels).
The agency Convergence Focal Person shall likewise be a member of the NCI-TWG. The
agency Convergence Focal Person shall work closely with the NCI Secretariat for effective
coordination of concerns of NCI and the working groups relative to their respective agency.
Working Groups of the NCI Technical Working Group
1. Working Group on Policy and Advocacy
The Policy and Advocacy group shall be mainly responsible for the review and audit of
conflicting and overlapping laws, policies and programs that hamper the implementation of
programs and projects of the different agencies. It shall recommend and draft the relevant policies
and other issuances that would harmonize or improve existing policies. It shall likewise identify
those issues that require legislation and coordinate with the appropriate offices and agencies and
stakeholder groups involved in advocating for the respective legislation.
Member:
Membership of the Working Group on Policy and Advocacy may be expanded to include
representatives from the three agencies whose work and responsibilities are related to the
component and other partners who can productively contribute to the initiatives of the working
group.
2. Working Group on Capacity Development
The Capacity Development group shall be responsible for formulating comprehensive capacity
development plans for the Convergence Initiative stakeholders to include training needs
84
Member:
Member:
Member:
The NCI shall likewise work with Non-Government Organizations coalition groups, Farmers
and Fisherfolk Associations and groups, Academe (State University and Colleges - SUCs),
and the Private/Business Sector.
B. Sub-National Level
It shall be noted that the National Convergence Initiative as a strategy for sustainable rural
development is a work in progress. Convergence implementing mechanisms and structures
established at the local (sub-national) levels and are working may be continued and further
documented as to its functionality. Otherwise, the convergence local structures shall be
organized as proposed below.
3. Regional Convergence Initiative-Technical Working Group (RCI-TWG)
Parallel to the NCI-TWG, the RCI-TWG shall manage and supervise the programs, projects,
and other related activities at the regional level. The RCI-TWG shall be the regional arm of
the NCI-TWG in carrying out its functions.
The RCI-TWG shall work closely with other government line agencies and offices and with
the Regional Development Council (RDC) and concerned Provincial Development Council
(PDC) to ensure that the enhanced convergence initiative interventions are aligned with the
regional development agenda and initiatives. It shall likewise facilitate complementation of
efforts and resources for greater impact.
The RCI-TWG shall coordinate and work closely with the Provincial Local Government
Units (PLGUs) in the implementation of the NCI plans, programs, projects, and other related
activities. The Regional Directors of DA, DAR, and DENR may enter into an agreement with
the Provincial Governor or LGU leagues, as necessary.
The RCI-TWG shall be composed of:
Co-Chairpersons:
Regional Director,
Chairperson:
Regional Director/Executive Director
Member:
Regional Director,
Regional Focal Person, Head RCI-TWG Secretariat
The chairperson of the RCI-TWG shall be a convergence champion and shall be decided by
and among the Regional Directors of DA, DAR and DENR. Upon the completion of the RCITWG composition, a resolution to that effect shall be submitted to the NCI Secretariat.
Membership of the RCI-TWG may be expanded to include representatives from the
Provincial LGUs and other agencies as deemed necessary.
88
IX.
FINANCING
Funds necessary to carry out the implementation of the enhanced Convergence Initiative shall
be taken from available funds of DA, DAR, and DENR. Other sources of funds such as
grants, donations, and other forms of assistance from donor agencies and other public or
private entities may be tapped and facilitated by NCI-NSC/TWG to support the objectives
identified subject to regular auditing guidelines and procedures. Cost-sharing or counterparting schemes among national government and LGUs will be encouraged to support the
implementation of the enhanced Convergence Initiative.
X.
The M&E design for Convergence Initiative shall be based on a common plan as agreed by
the three agencies. The plans shall ensure that it can contribute to the attainment of the overall
goals and objectives of MfDR.
91
ANNEX A
CONVERGENCE INITIATIVE FRAMEWORK USING THE WATERSHED AND
ECOSYSTEM APPROACH
92
ANNEX B
National Convergence Initiatives
for Sustainable Rural Development
Logical Framework Matrix
Overall Societal Goal (Per MTPDP 2011-2016):
Inclusive growth
Socio-economic growth that is rapid enough
to matter;
Sustained growth that
creates jobs,
draws the vast majority into the
economic and social mainstream and
continuously reduces mass poverty
95
Indicators
Joint Administrative
Order governing the
policy making
process governing
NCI adopted
No. of legal
instruments
formulated ,
approved and
disseminated to
concerned units
Indicators
No. of advocacy-
Agri-business/Agro- Enterprise /
Agro-forestry Cluster Development
Outputs
Indicators
Strategic convergence Number of
sites identified and
convergence
prioritized
clusters identified
Clusters established
and models
developed.
Capacity Development
Outputs
Indicators
Learning packages Joint interventions among the 3
for field
agencies (training, enterprise
implementers/const
development projects, policy and
ituents developed
advocacy, Monitoring &
Evaluation, Knowledge
Management)at all levels
(national, regional, provincial,
municipal
Increased access to information
(technology, market info) or
decision making
Implementers at local level
demonstrate adequate skills on
strategic partnership, conflict
management, facilitation,
communication, Resource Mob
responsive participation and
involvement in the convergence
initiative
number of clusters established
Models, programs Innovative modalities on
on capacity
convergence capacity
number of models
development for
development
constituents /field
implementers
developed
Agri-business/Agro- Enterprise /
Agro-forestry Cluster Development
Outputs
Indicators
Tools and learning
Number and types
Capacity Development
Outputs
Capacity
Indicators
Implementers are able to engage
Knowledge Management
Outputs
NCI unified
approach for
identifying
convergence areas
and projects /
interventions in
place
Indicators
Convergence areas
and projects are
identified jointly by
DA-DAR and DENR
according to the
agreed criteria
NCI programs,
projects and
initiatives are
implemented and
monitored in an
efficient and
effective manner
DA DAR-DENR
incorporate
Convergence
requirement in their
PPAs and reported
accordingly
Knowledge Management
Outputs
NCI innovations,
Indicators
Convergence
96
related
commitments of
support from the
government, civil
society organization,
lawmakers
implementation kits
developed and
institutionalized
development
network
(institutions,
academe, NGOs)
established
Approved Executive
Order (EO) for the
implementation of the
Greening Program
No. of EO approved
and disseminated
Functional
convergence network
and pool of champions
established and
sustained
number of networks
and pool of
champions
established
M and E
constituency
satisfaction
assessment
developed and
institutionalized
Implementing
Guidelines
formulated and
approved
Access facilitation of
cluster development
services
Services
accessedbyagrienterprise cluster
System generated
Monitoring and
Evaluation Reports
best practices,
lessons
documented,
shared and
disseminated for
possible adoption,
expansion, scaling
up and funding
support.
experiences
translated in various
forms: publications,
web port and
funding proposals
increased participation of
beneficiaries/stakeholders in
community activities
responsive participation and
involvement in the convergence
initiative
97
ANNEX C
DA-DAR-DENR CONVERGENCE INITIATIVE STRUCTURE
98
ANNEX B
LIST OF WATERSHED SUPPORTING 141 RIVER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS OF NIA7
NO.
Name of Watershed
Grand Total
CAR
Chico River
NIS
Supported
2
3
Region I
Bolo River
Bonga River
Barbaquezo River
Cura RIS
Vintar River
Bolo RIS
Bonga Pump
Dingras RIS
LaoagVintar River
WMC Pasuqui
Tagudin RIS
Sta Maria-Burgos
7
8
Sta. Lucia-Candon
Dipalo River
Sta. Lucia-Candon
Dipalo RIS
Ambayoan River
Ambayoan RIS
10
11
Dumoloc River
Bued River
Dumoloc RIS
San Fabian RIS
Location
(Province)
Mt. Province
Kalinga
Apayao
Mt. Province
Kalinga
Ifugao
IlocosNorte
IlocosNorte
Abra
Apayao
IlocosNorte
Apayao
IlocosNorte
Ilocos Sur
Ilocos Sur
Abra
Ilocos Sur
Pangasinan
Nueva Ecija
San Nicolas
Nueva Ecija
Pangasinan
Pangasinan
Watershed Area
(Ha)
5,885,206
1,603,080
220,000
River Basin
110,000
918,680
147,800
17,200
55,700
14,000
7,900
29,000
24,000
25,600
16,400
16,800
4,200
Buhi RB
Laoag RB
Bacarra-Vintar RB
Silay-Sta. Maria RB
Agno River Basin
30,000
8,200
29,700
NO.
Name of Watershed
NIS
Supported
12
Agno River
Location
(Province)
La Union
Pangasinan
Nueva Ecija
Ifugao
Benguet
Nueva Vizcaya
Pangasinan
Pangasinan
La Union
Benguet
Ilocos Sur
La Union
13
14
15
Sinucalan River
ADRIIS Extension
Amburayan River
16
Masalip RIS
17
Masalip River
Region II
Magat River
18
Mallig River
Mallig RIS
19
Gatto Creek
Pamplona RIS
20
Baua RIS
Nueva Vizcaya
Ifugao
Mt. Province
Kalinga
Cagayan
Apayao
Cagayan
Abulog-Apayao RIS
Pinacanauan RIS
Dummun RIS
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Paranan,
Taguntungan&
Paned River
Zinundungan River,
Siculao and
Banurbur Creeks
Pinacanauan de
Tumauini River
Pinacanauan de San
Magat RIS
Watershed Area
(Ha)
River Basin
228,380
152,350
152,350
5,900
99,300
27,300
776,850
412,300
45,580
1,920
5,000
Cagayan
Cagayan
Cagayan
205,000
12,920
20,600
Baggao RIS
Cagayan
20,950
Zinundungan RIS
Cagayan
21,500
Cagayan RB and
Zinundungan RB
Tumauini RIS
Isabela
17,630
Cagayan RB
San Pablo-Cabagan
Isabela
13,450
Amburayan RB
100
NO.
Name of Watershed
28
Pablo River
Region III
Tarlac River
29
Camiling River
30
31
Talavera River
Talavera River, de
Babuyan Creek
Talavera Vasra
Creek, Murion Pas
Creek
Pampanga RiverTacalo Creek
Caulaman River
Caulaman RIS
32
33
Nayom River
Sto. Tomas River
Nayom RIS
Sto, Tomas RIS
34
Bucao River
Bucao RIS
35
Porac-Gumain River
PoracGumain RIS
36
37
38
Angat-Maasim River
Ipo River
Colo River
Region IVA
Balanac River
Mabacan River
Mayor River
Sta Cruz Lapad
River
Sta Maria & Mata
ANgat-Maasim RIS
La Mesa Dam
Colo RIS
Zambales
Bataan
Zambales
Pangasinan
Zambales
Zambales
Tarlac, Capas
Pampanga
Zambales
Bulacan
Bulacan
Bataan
Balanac RIS
Mabacan RIS
Mayor RIS
Sta Cruz RIS
Sta Maria RIS
39
40
41
42
43
NIS
Supported
RIS
Location
(Province)
Watershed Area
(Ha)
Tarlac RIS
San Miguel Odonell
RIS
Camiling RIS
Tarlac
381,370
26,750
26,100
UPRIIS
UPRIIS I
Tarlac
Zambales
Pampanga
River Basin
Agno/Odonell RB
Agno/Camiling RB
24,700
82,900
Pampanga River Basin
UPRIIS II
UPRIIS III
1,800
1,835
18,100
55,320
22,500
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
Laguna
61,300
6,600
8,850
242,636
6,660
4,900
3,300
8,000
Laguna
1,150
Pasig-Laguna Bay RB
Sta. Cruz River Basin
101
NO.
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Name of Watershed
River
NPC Tailrace &Lewin
Creek
Laguna FLIS
Cavite
Palico River
Laguas-Balakin
River
Hanagdong River
Dumasca River
Agos River
Marikina River
Region IV B
Langkawan-Bansud
River
Bucayao-Langkawan
River
NIS
Supported
Location
(Province)
Watershed Area
(Ha)
Luban RIS
Laguna
1,350
Laguna
Palico RIS
Batangas
Cavite
Quezon
30,630
52,900
11,800
Laguas RIS
Hanagdong RIS
Dumasca RIS
Agos RIS
Wawa Dam
Quezon
Quezon
Quezon
Rizal
Rizal
Bansud RIS
Mindoro Oriental
55
Pula River
Pula RIS
56
Mag-asawangTubigMapalo Rivers
Mag-asawangTubig
RIS
57
Pagbahan River
Pagbahan RIS
58
Patrick River
Amnay-Patrick RIS
59
Mongpong River
Mongpong RIS
Mindoro Oriental
Mindoro
Occidental
Mindoro Oriental
Mindoro
Occidental
Mindoro Oriental
Mindoro
Occidental
Mindoro
Occidental
Mindoro Oriental
Mindoro
Occidental
Mindoro Oriental
Mindoro
Occidental
River Basin
Laguna
1,860
1,360
8,500
91,260
18,966
188,815
7,000
Bukal (Lalangan)
Agos River Basin
Pasig-Laguna de Bay
Bansud River Basin
26,000
12,970
19,565
Mag-asawangTubig River
Basin
23,380
20,750
22,300
NO.
Name of Watershed
60
Caguray River
NIS
Supported
Caguray RIS
61
Lumuitao River
Lumiutao RIS
62
Malatgao RIS
63
Malatgao River
Region V
Quinale River
64
Barit river
Hibiga RIS
Mahaba RIS
Nasisi RIS
Ogsong RIS
Barit RIS
65
64
65
Daet River
Talisay river
BuhiLalo River
Daet RIS
Talisay RIS
BuhiLalo RIS
66
Libmanan River
Libmanan-Cabusao
RIS
67
68
69
70
71
Pili River
THI river
Bulan River
San Francisco River
Rida River
Region VI
TipuluanSibalom
Rivers
Mambusao River
Pili RIS
THI RIS
Bulan RIS
San Francisco RIS
Rida RIS
Aganan -Tigum
Rivers
Barotac Viejo River
Aganan RIS
Antique
Ilolilo
Capiz
Aklan
Iloilo
IIoilo
72
73
74
75
Jalaur River
Sibalom-San Jose
RIS
Mambusao RIS
Location
(Province)
Mindoro
Occidental
Mindoro
Occidental
Palawan
Albay
Albay
Camarines Sur
CamarinesNorte
CamarinesNorte
Camarines Sur
Albay
Camarines Sur
CamarinesNorte
Quezon
Sorsogon
Camarines Sur
Sorsogon
Sorsogon
Watershed Area
(Ha)
12,900
River Basin
Caguray River Basin
38,600
5,350
134,240
10,090
19,500
6,320
2,820
21,850
54,200
2,680
8,990
6,200
1,590
363,390
61,600
31,630
11,300
9,150
Iloilo
103
NO.
Name of Watershed
NIS
Supported
76
Jalaur-Suage River
77
78
79
Sibalom-Tigbanan
Rivers
Sta Barbara River
Bago River
Jalaur RIS
Suage RIS
Sibalom-Tigbanan
RIS
Sta Barbara RIS
Bago RIS
80
Pangiplan River
Pangiplan RIS
81
Panukayan river
Panukayan RIS
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Region VIII
Balire River
BaoBaleonCabugaoMaasin Rivers
Binahaan-Candiis
Rivers
Bito River
Daguitan River
Gibuga River
Guinarona River
Mainit River
Ponggo River
Tibak-Maslog Rivers
Salog-PanipianBejirong-Magtagoy
Creeks
Region IX
Salug-Pako
Location
(Province)
Capiz
Iloilo
Iloilo
Iloilo
Negros
Occidental
Negros
Occidental
Negros Oriental
Aklan
Antique
Watershed Area
(Ha)
River Basin
107,700
17,480
11,400
19,200
62,500
8,030
23,400
Northern Leyte
Northern Leyte
71,460
4,500
5,800
Northern Leyte
10,540
Leyte
5,670
5,700
11,380
4,300
5,400
1,450
3,150
4,020
2,350
7,200
Salug RIS
Northern Leyte
Northern Leyte
Northern Leyte
Northern Leyte
Northern Leyte
Northern Leyte
Northern Leyte
Northern Leyte
Southern Leyte
Zamboanga del
132,360
30,900
NO.
Name of Watershed
NIS
Supported
Location
(Province)
Sur
Watershed Area
(Ha)
River Basin
Dipolog RIS
Zamboanga del
Sur
36,300
Labangan RIS
Zamboanga del
Sur
43,360
Zamboanga del
Sur
21,800
100
101
Salog-Piit-Osugan
Rivers
Timonan-DumingagGuitran-Dipolog
Rivers
Libungan-PulusanLantian-Tiwagan
Rivers
Sibuguey-Dipili
Rivers
Region X
Manuplai River
Muleta-Kulaman
Rivers
Kuya River
Region XI
Batutu River
Libuganon River
102
Saug-Madgao Rivers
Saug RIS
103
Lasang River
Lasang RIS
104
Mal river
Mar RIS
105
Padada-SakubOdaka-Balutakay
Creeks
Sumlog River
Buayan-Tinagacan
Rivers
Padada RIS
94
95
96
97
98
99
106
107
Manuplai RIS
Muleta RIS
Bukidnon
Bukidnon
RoxasKuya RIS
Bukidnon
Batutu RIS
Libuganon River
Lupon RIS
Buayan RIS
Davao Oriental
South Cotabato
Sarangani
Davao del Sur
44,600
13,850
21,450
9,300
507,625
10,500
74,730
Compostela Valley
Tagum-Libuganon River
Basin
41,100
39,450
35,400
81,850
Padada-Malitiit
25,540
7,580
NO.
Name of Watershed
108
Allah-Lomon-Sepaka
Rivers
Banga River
109
110
111
NIS
Supported
Allah I RIS
Location
(Province)
South Cotabato
Watershed Area
(Ha)
88,700
Banga RIS
South Cotabato
Sarangani
SuiltanKudarat
South Cotabato
South Cotabato
28,800
53,300
20,675
285,940
39,350
74,000
51,700
20,100
31,200
3,131
113
114
Siluay-Klinan Rivers
Marbel-Taplan Rivers
Region XII
Cabayugan River
Kabakan River
Siluay RIS
Marbel RIS 1&2
115
Libungan River
Maranding RIS
KabakanPagalungan RIS
Libungan RIS
116
117
Mlang River
Malasila River
Mlang RIS
Malasila RIS
118
Allah II Lambayong
RIS
119
120
121
122
KapingkongDumagui
l River
Region XIII
Cabadbaran River
Taguibo River
Andanan River
Simulao River
123
Camac-an River
Cantilan RIS
124
Tago River
Tago RIS
125
126
ARRM
Rugnan River
Alip River
Rugnan RIS
Alip RIS
Cabadbaran RIS
Taguibo RIS
Andanan RIS
Simulao RIS
River Basin
208,060
7,350
8,430
19,200
42,900
12,180
118,000
56,100
18,150
37,950
106
ANNEX C
LIST OF POOREST AND MOST FOOD POOR PROVINCES
Ranking of Provinces by Poverty Incidence8
Region
ARMM
ARMM
Province
SULU
MAGUINDAN
AO
REGION V
MASBATE
REGION XI SARANGGAN
I
CARAGA AGUSAN DEL
SUR
REGION
SULTAN
XII
KUDARAT
ARMM
LANAO DEL
SUR
REGION IV
ORIENTAL
MINDORO
ARMM
TAWI TAWI
REGION
COTABATO
XII
CAR
MOUNTAIN
PROVINCE
REGION IV
PALAWAN
REGION IV OCCIDENTAL
MINDORO
REGION IX ZAMBOANGA
DEL NORTE
REGION
NORTHERN
VIII
SAMAR
Poverty
Incidence
Rank
(Poorest
= 1)
0.6753
0.6687
1
2
Probabilit
y in
Poorest
40
1.0000
1.0000
0.6429
0.6328
3
4
1.0000
1.0000
0.5994
1.0000
0.5986
1.0000
0.5923
1.0000
0.5848
1.0000
0.5596
0.5553
9
10
1.0000
1.0000
0.5460
11
1.0000
0.5422
0.5356
12
13
1.0000
1.0000
0.5274
14
1.0000
0.5264
15
1.0000
8Source: Estimation of Local Poverty in the Philippines, November 2005, the World Bank
107
Region
Province
Poverty
Incidence
Rank
(Poorest
= 1)
CAR
CARAGA
IFUGAO
SURIGAO
DEL NORTE
SAMAR
0.5262
0.5260
16
17
Probabilit
y in
Poorest
40
1.0000
1.0000
0.5190
18
1.0000
DAVAO
ORIENTAL
ROMBLON
SURIGAO
DEL SUR
SORSOGON
CAPIZ
NEGROS
ORIENTAL
KALINGA
LANAO DEL
NORTE
MARINDUQU
E
BASILAN
ALBAY
ANTIQUE
CAMARINES
SUR
CAMIGUIN
AKLAN
COMPOSTEL
A VALLEY
BOHOL
0.5099
19
1.0000
0.5075
0.5000
20
21
1.0000
1.0000
0.4953
0.4936
0.4902
22
23
24
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
0.4830
0.4827
25
26
0.9800
1.0000
0.4777
27
1.0000
0.4770
0.4741
0.4724
0.4723
28
29
30
31
0.9400
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
0.4695
0.4645
0.4644
32
33
34
0.9000
0.9900
0.9200
0.4536
35
0.8500
BILIRAN
0.4536
36
0.8300
REGION
VIII
REGION XI
REGION IV
CARAGA
REGION V
REGION VI
REGION
VII
CAR
REGION
XII
REGION IV
REGION IX
REGION V
REGION VI
REGION V
REGION X
REGION VI
REGION XI
REGION
VII
REGION
VIII
108
Region
Province
CAR
APAYAO
REGION IX ZAMBOANGA
DEL SUR
REGION V CATANDUAN
ES
REGION X
BUKIDNON
REGION
EASTERN
VIII
SAMAR
REGION VI
NEGROS
OCCIDENTAL
CAR
ABRA
REGION VI
GUIMARAS
REGION V CAMARINES
NORTE
REGION IV
QUEZON
REGION
LEYTE
VIII
REGION VI
ILOILO
CARAGA AGUSAN DEL
NORTE
REGION IV
AURORA
REGION II
CAGAYAN
REGION X
MISAMIS
OCCIDENTAL
REGION III NUEVA ECIJA
REGION
SOUTHERN
VIII
LEYTE
REGION I
ILOCOS SUR
REGION II
ISABELA
REGION XI
SOUTH
COTABATO
REGION
CEBU
Poverty
Incidence
Rank
(Poorest
= 1)
0.4485
0.4468
37
38
Probabilit
y in
Poorest
40
0.6600
0.7600
0.4399
39
0.6300
0.4379
0.4370
40
41
0.5200
0.5600
0.4321
42
0.3700
0.4270
0.4222
0.4206
43
44
45
0.3200
0.3500
0.2200
0.4191
0.4077
46
47
0.1000
0.0300
0.4007
0.4000
48
49
0.0000
0.0400
0.3985
0.3899
0.3818
50
51
52
0.0300
0.0000
0.0000
0.3728
0.3696
53
54
0.0000
0.0000
0.3512
0.3493
0.3489
55
56
57
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3478
58
0.0000
109
Region
Province
VII
REGION I PANGASINAN
REGION I
LA UNION
REGION XI
DAVAO
REGION IV
BATANGAS
REGION II
QUIRINO
REGION X
MISAMIS
ORIENTAL
REGION
SIQUIJOR
VII
REGION II
NUEVA
VIZCVAYA
REGION I
ILOCOS
NORTE
REGION XI DAVAO DEL
SUR
CAR
BENGUET
REGION III
TARLAC
REGION II
BATANES
REGION III
PAMPANGA
REGION III
ZAMBALES
REGION III
BULACAN
REGION III
BATAAN
REGION IV
RIZAL
REGION IV
LAGUNA
REGION IV
CAVITE
ST
NCR
1 DISTRICT
NCR
3RD DISTRICT
NCR
4TH DISTRICT
NCR
2ND DISTRICT
Poverty
Incidence
Rank
(Poorest
= 1)
Probabilit
y in
Poorest
40
0.3462
0.3431
0.3378
0.3339
0.3277
0.3238
59
60
61
62
63
64
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3102
65
0.0000
0.2991
66
0.0000
0.2916
67
0.0000
0.2647
68
0.0000
0.2509
0.2482
0.2338
0.2204
0.2196
0.1622
0.1556
0.1532
0.1297
0.1287
0.1133
0.0999
0.0729
0.0655
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
110
111
ANNEX D
FORMAT FOR CONVERGENCE AREA EVALUATION
Name of Potential Convergence
Area/Municipality:_________________________________________
Criteria
Weight %
Distributio
n
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
35%
2,000 to 5,000
ha
with at least 2
crops
5,000 to 10,000
ha
with at least 3
crops
10,000
to
15,000 ha
with at least 4
crops
15,000
t0
20,000 ha
with at least 5
crops
More
20,000 ha
with mor
6 crops
25%
More
than
4,000
households
majority
of
whom are small
farmers,
agrarian reform
beneficiaries,
agriculture
workers,
fishers, IPs and
rural women
Site is
considered non-
Site is either
one of the top
More
than
3,000
households
majority
of
whom
are
small farmers,
agrarian
reform
beneficiaries,
agriculture
workers,
fishers, IPs and
rural women
Site is either
one of the top
More
5,000
househol
majority
whom are
farmers,
agrarian
beneficia
agricultur
workers,
fishers, I
rural
w
olds
Site is pa
the top 1
Selection
Criteria (Must)
1.
2.
Completenes
s of the
ecosystem
zones which
cut across
various
ecosystems
or a
combination
of at least
two
ecosystems.
Should be
located within the
143 priority
watersheds
identified/proclai
med by DENR
(append list c/o
EDU)
Prioritization
Criteria
1.
3.
Presence of
key
production
zones with
connectivity
for increased
productivity
and income
Combination
of sites
across major
poverty
groups
-112-
Site is part of
the 11th to 20th
Criteria
5.
Weight %
Distributio
n
Presence of
development
oriented local
government
leaders and
LGU alliances
20%
1
poor nor non
food-poor based
on the NSCB list
Willingness
to
provide
counterpart of
at least 5% of
the
LGUs
annual
development
fund,
With sustained
linkage with any
2
government
agencies
or
other
external
partners.
Strongly
supports
programs/projec
ts of DA, DAR
and DENR
6.
Presence of
NGOs, POs,
private sector
and an
academic/res
earch
commmunity
Total Rating
20%
100%
Presence of at
least
3
POs,
NGOs,
private
sector
organizations
that are willing
to
support
convergence
initiative
--
21 and above
poorest or most
food-poor
provinces based
on the latest
NSCB list
Willingness
to
provide
counterpart of
at least 10% of
the
LGUs
annual
development
fund,
20 poorest or
most foodpoor provinces
based on the
latest NSCB
list
Willingness to
provide
counterpart
of at least
15% of the
LGUs annual
development
fund,
poorest and
most food-poor
provinces
based on the
latest NSCB list
poorest a
food-poor
provinces
based on
latest NS
Willingness to
provide
counterpart
of at least
20%
of
the
LGUs
annual
development
fund,
Willingne
provide
counterp
of at
25%
o
LGUs
developm
fund,
With sustained
linkage with DA,
DAR andDENR
Presence of at
least one LGU
initiated
program/proje
ct
Presence of at
least two LGU
initiated
program/projec
ts
Presence
least
LGU ini
program/
ts
With sustained
linkage
with
DA,
DAR,
DENR or any
entity
operating
in
the area in the
last 2 years..
With sustained
linkage
with
DA,,DAr, DENR
or amy entity
operating
in
the area in the
last 3years.
With sus
linkage
DA, DAR,
in the
years.
Presence of at
least 4 POs,
NGOs, private
sector
organizations
implementing
programs and
projects in the
last 2 years.
--
Presence of at
least 5 POs,
NGOs, private
sector
organizations
implementing
programs and
projects in the
last 3years.
--
Strongly
supports
programs/projec
ts
of
other
government
entities
operating in the
area.
Presence of at
least
4
POs,
NGOs,
private
sector
organizations
that have start
up projects in
the area
---
Presence
Operation
Maintena
Plan
fo
going or
projects
embodied
the
annual
investme
plan.
Presence
least 6
NGOs,
sector
organizat
implemen
programs
projects
last 4 yea
--
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Date:
____________________________________________
-114-
ANNEX E
Pro-Forma Letter re: Endorsement of the Evaluation Results for Site Selection
TO:
THE CHAIRPERSON
REGIONAL CONVERGENCE INITIATIVE
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP
We respectfully endorse the evaluation results covering the following areas/sites for possible
inclusion in the DA-DAR-DENR Convergence Initiative of the Province of ___.
Based on the evaluation results, the following sites/areas are favourably recommended for inclusion
in the Provincial Convergence Initiative:
1.
2.
Attached are the pertinent documents for your review. Should you find them in order, may we
request the confirmation of the recommended sites so we can jump start the PCI activities in these
areas.
115
ANNEX F
PRO-FORMA LETTER RE: CONFIRMATION ON CONVERGENCE AREA SELECTION
___________________________
Date
The Chairperson
Provincial Convergence Initiative Technical Working Group
Dear ________________,
This is to confirm the selection of __________________________ as the site of the National
Convergence Initiative for the period ___________________ to _____________________ as per
result of the selection process undertaken by the PCITWG on _________________ to
___________________.
It is understood that the necessary steps will be taken at your end to commence the development
activities in your area and facilitate the achievement of the convergence initiative goals.
Very truly yours,
________________________
Chairperson, Regional Convergence Initiative Technical Working Group
116
ANNEX G
LIST OF ALL CONFIRMED CONVERGENCE AREA
Municipalities Covered
Barangays
Covered
Areas to be
developed
Target Beneficiaries
117
ANNEX H
CONVERGENCE AREA PROFILE FORMAT
EXISTING SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
Coverage
Number
Kind
(ha./km./lm)
___________________
_
_________________________________________
____________________
___________________
_
_________________________________________
____________________
___________________
_
_________________________________________
____________________
___________________
_
_________________________________________
____________________
___________________
_
_________________________________________
____________________
ON-GOING DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
OF THE AREA
Agency
Name of Project
Responsible
Name of Project
Estimated Cost
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
___________________
Name of Organizations
Services/Business
118
academic, etc.)
___________________________________
____________________
___________________
___________________________________
____________________
___________________
___________________________________
____________________
___________________
___________________________________
____________________
___________________
___________________________________
____________________
___________________
___________________________________
____________________
___________________
119
SYNTHESIS MAP
OF THE CONVERGENCE AREA
LEGEND
Road Network
including Bridges
Livestock Development/
Agro Forestry Area
Mineral Deposits
Barangay/Municipal
Boundaries
Bodies of Water
Lowland Agricultural
Area
Economic/CommercialC
enters
Growth Centers
Market Distribution
Centers
Tourism Zones
Other Protected Areas
120
ANNEX I
INVESTMENT PROPOSAL/BUSINESS PLAN TEMPLATE
* Cover Page
* Table of Contents
* Executive Summary - Answers the what, who, when,
where,how, and how much with respect to the company,
management, business objectives, financing, repayment strategies, etc.
a. Description of the Business discuss what are the main
activities of the investment proposal, who is the proponent, what are
the goal and objectives of your proposed undertaking, what modality
you are proposing (open investment, joint-venture, partnership or
just a loan financing)
b. Product/Service Summary - present here the products that
your project will be producing or the services that the project will
be doing
c. Business Strategy discuss here how you plan to run and
manage your business, where and how you source out your raw
materials, what are your market and promotion strategies
d. Financial Strategy show in here the total financial
requirement of the project and the breakdown of the financing
summary, how much is being proposed for investment and how
much is the equity of the proponent.
Chapter 1- Industry and Market Analysis - This portion describes the
industry you are
getting into, your target market as well as your competitors. It looks
at the nature and trend of the industry that allows you to make the
appropriate strategy foryour product or service.
a. Product or Service please back up with a picture
- Product/Service Description
- Product application/uses
121
- Product packaging
b. Market Research
- Market Trends(discuss here the market trend, the supply and
demand gap of your proposed and related products)
- External Research(if there are external research conducted to
support that
there is really a market potential of your proposed
product)
- Market Estimates discuss here how much of the current market
you want to serve.
c. Marketing Plan & Sales Strategy
- SWOT Analysis
- Competitive Analysis discuss here the comparative advantage of
the project considering the capacity of the
proponent/management team or the target group or area that
the project will be dealing, the presence of strong support group,
etc.
- Target Customer Groups discuss here who are your target
customers/markets. If you already have a list of potential market
and their volume requirement, discuss and present it here.
- Customer Demographics
- Sales Strategy discuss in here where your
- Pricing & Positioning
- In-depth Marketing Plan
- Advertising & Promotion
Chapter 2 - Company Summary or Business Structure - This section
presents your management team, business
location, and
business organization. This illustrates the organizational structure
and their functions.
a. Management team
122
b. Business Location
c. Business Organization
Chapter 3 - Company Positioning or Operational Plan
a. Goals & Objectives/Mission Statement
b. Strategy of Implementation or Action Plan
c. Technical Processes of the product or service
d. Resource Allocation
- Human Resource
- Raw Materials
e. Budget Allocation
Chapter 4 -Financial Plan - This section includes realistic financial
points, forecasts and system. It is important to visualize the worst case,
expected case, and best-case financial forecasts. The forecasts must be
backed up by the marketing plan and industry trend figures to ensure the
reliability of your assumptions. Always include current data.
a. Staffing & Employees
b. Start-up Budget
c. Forecast Profit & Loss Account
d. Forecast Balance Sheet
e. Forecast Cash flow
f. Sales & Profit Forecasts
g. Sales Charts & Graphs
Attachments
a. Monthly Cash Flow Analysis
b. Monthly Profit & Loss Analysis
c. Monthly Sales by Product
123
KAMAYO
INVESTMENT
PROPOSAL
124
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter
Description
Executive Summary
Page
2
12
II
Business Structure
18
III
Operations Plan
23
IV
Financial Plan
27
Attachments/Annexes
33
125
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A.
126
B.
Product Summary
Product Description
These are deep-fried and/or dried slices of banana, either plain or provided with
flavoringsuch as honey or caramel.
Energy
Protein
Fat, Total
- Saturated
- Polyunsaturated
Monounsaturated
Cholesterol
Carbohydrate
Sugars
Dietary Fiber
Thiamin
Riboflavin
Niacin Equivalents
Vitamin C
Folate
Vitamin A
Sodium
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Phosphorus
Iron
Zinc
Average Quantity
per Serving
392kJ (94Cal)
1.7g
0.1g
0.0g
0.0g
0.0g
0.0mg
19.9g
16.9g
2.2g
less than 0.1mg
0.1mg (7%RDI)
0.9mg (9%RDI)
12.1mg (30%RDI)
14.1ug (7%RDI)
13.1ug (2%RDI)
1mg
345mg
19.2mg (6%RDI)
5.1mg (1%RDI)
26.3mg (3%RDI)
0.5mg (4%RDI)
0.2mg (2%RDI)
127
Product Application/Uses
C.
Business Strategy
The business is designed to process locally-produced cardaba bananas. Farmers shall
be provided with proper and regular training regarding the quality requirements or
specifications of fresh cardaba acceptable to the plant. Premium price will also be given
to fresh banana deliveries falling under the Extra Class and Class I.
Banana farmers will not be treated as raw material suppliers only but as partner farmerinvestors. As such, they will be allowed to subscribe and contribute a considerable stake
in the ownership of the business entity. One (1) seat in the Project Management Board or
Board of Director as soon as the business establishment will acquire a separate legal
personality will be allocated to them.
Farmer`s capital contribution will come in the form of retention from the total value of
fresh banana deliveries. Amount to be retained will depend on the subscribed capital of a
particular farmer and volume of deliveries in a given period.
To conform to the specifications of the export market, processing facility and its
equipment will be acquired from fabricators recognized by the industry. Following are the
equipment necessary for the operation of the processing plant:
Banana Slicing Machine -To slice the bananas into thin slices for making
bananachips as per required type and thickness. It is possible to make different styles
by simply changing the cutting knife of the machine..
BananaSlice Washing Machine -To wash the prepared slices and remove starch
form it.
Water De-hydrator Machine -To reduce the moisture content from the banana slices
so that they get easily fried in the frying machine.
Contunuous Frying Machine -To fry the banana slices in hot cooking oil.
128
Oil Extractor Machine -To extract the excess oil from the bananachips before
packing.
Automatic Seasoning Machine -To add oil and required seasoning to the fried
bananachips to give the different flavors to the bananachips.
Automatic Pouch Packing Machine -To pack the bananachips into attractive printed
pouches with gas flushing.
The Process Flow of the Project is shown in Figure 1.
The project plans to market its produce both local and abroad. Seventypercent (70%)
of its production will be designated for the export market and the balance for the local
market. Regional Chapters of the Friends of Bislig Incorporated (FOBI), both local and
foreign, will serve as the marketing arm of the project.
Figure. 1 Process Flow Chart
SORTING/
WEIGHING
WASHING
PEELING
WASHING
CHIPPING
WASHING/
DEWATERING
FIRST
FRYING
SECOND
FRYING
PACKAGING
MARKETINGSTORING/ 129
D.
Financial Summary
The total financial requirement for putting up the project into full operation amounts to
PhP55 Million. Twenty two percent (22%) will be provided by the proponent and eight
percent (8%) will be provided by the banana growers in terms of fresh banana deliveries
during the early part of the project implementation stage.
Table 2.BusinessFinancing
2.BusinessFinancing Scheme
Particulars
LOAN/
Investment
FOBI
Farmers
Total
Land
500,000
500,000
Site development
500,000
500,000
Water system
500,000
500,000
8,950,000
1,050,000
10,000,000
Weighing scale
50,000
50,000
Cooling system
300,000
300,000
Overhead crane
500,000
500,000
150,000
150,000
Input warehouse
500,000
500,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
750,000
750,000
20,000,000
20,000,000
500,000
500,000
5,000,000
5,000,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
Transport vehicle
2,000,000
2,000,000
Crates
170,000
170,000
Office equipments
100,000
100,000
Processing house
130
Tools
24,000
24,000
Cooking oil
300,000
300,000
Supplies
520,000
520,000
Other ingredients
150,000
150,000
Utilities
150,000
150,000
Working capital
4,228,000
4,228,000
8,456,000
Labor
480,000
480,000
126,000
174,000
300,000
Fees/Licenses
300,000
300,000
Promotion and
advertisement
300,000
300,000
38,500,000
12,098,000
4,402,000
55,000,000
70.00
22.00
8.00
100.00
Total
Percentage
The proponent equity will be equitably divided from the members of FOBI at the
minimum investment of PhP10,000.00 per member. This is equivalent to two (2)
shares valued at PhP5,000.00 per share. At present, the organization has more than
three hundred (300) members.
Each Farmer-Investor on the other hand, will be allowed to invest a minimum paid-up
capital of one (1) share. Converting their investment in terms of fresh bananas, it is
equivalent only to 715 kilos. It will be paid within a period of one (1) yearin twelve (12)
equal installments or at least 60 kilograms of fresh cardaba bananas per month.
The City Government of Bislig is already considered as an investor to this business
endeavor. Cost of land and land development of the proposed business is the
potential area where the LGU could come in as their support.
Other interested individuals, particularly those who are former PICOP employees now
residing in Bislig City, will also be allowedto invest.
131
Operating Income
(Net Income before
Interest/Taxes) OI
18,415,700.00
55,390,821.68
ROI
(0I / TA)
%
33.25%
18,349,700.00
55,723,563.36
32.93%
18,280,400.00
55,995,321.04
32.65%
18,207,635.00
56,203,045.52
32.40%
18,131,231.75
56,343,535.14
32.18%
17,978,077.96
56,349,249.43
31.90%
17,809,973.45
56,207,031.74
31.69%
17,625,441.37
55,902,425.82
31.53%
17,422,858.11
55,419,546.64
31.44%
10
17,200,438.65
34,002,437.21
50.59%
Year
Total Assets - TA
340.54%
10
ROI =
34.05%
Payback Period
Cumulative
Year
Net Income
Net Income
Cumulative
Depreciation
(NI)
Depreciation
(Depn)
10,007,521.74
10,007,521.74
4,304,400.00
4,304,400.00
9,956,041.74
19,963,563.48
4,304,400.00
8,608,800.00
9,901,987.74
29,865,551.23
4,304,400.00
12,913,200.00
9,845,231.04
39,710,782.27
4,304,400.00
17,217,600.00
9,785,636.51
49,496,418.78
4,304,400.00
21,522,000.00
9,666,176.55
59,162,595.33
4,304,400.00
25,826,400.00
9,535,055.03
68,697,650.36
4,304,400.00
30,130,800.00
132
9,391,120.01
78,088,770.37
4,304,400.00
34,435,200.00
9,233,105.07
87,321,875.44
4,304,400.00
38,739,600.00
10
9,059,617.89
96,381,493.32
4,304,400.00
43,044,000.00
Average
9,813,950.05
4,304,400.00
14,118,350.05
PP=
3.90 years
As can be gleaned from the table above, the business will pay-off its investments within a
period of almost four (4) years from the start of its processing operations.
Year
Disc.
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
TOTAL
(n)
Factor
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3
Source N
SALES
1.0000
0.8929
58,708,800
58,708,800
52,418,571
0.7972
58,708,800
58,708,800
46,802,296
0.7118
58,708,800
58,708,800
41,787,764
0.6355
58,708,800
58,708,800
37,310,504
0.5674
58,708,800
58,708,800
33,312,950
0.5066
58,708,800
58,708,800
29,743,705
0.4523
58,708,800
58,708,800
26,556,880
0.4039
58,708,800
58,708,800
23,711,500
(P)
133
0.3606
58,708,800
58,708,800
21,170,982
10
0.3220
58,708,800
58,708,800
18,902,662
331,717,81
4
Disc.
(n)
Factor
1.0000
Investments
/
Production/
Operating
Taxes &
TOTAL
Other
COSTS
Present
Value
Manufacturing
(Admin/Mrktg
)
55,000,000
55,000,000
0.8929
37,260,760
3,032,340
4,029,310
44,322,410
39,573,580
0.7972
37,260,760
3,098,340
4,035,910
44,395,010
35,391,430
0.7118
37,260,760
3,167,640
4,042,840
44,471,240
31,653,750
0.6355
37,260,760
3,240,405
4,050,117
44,551,282
28,313,145
0.5674
37,260,760
3,316,808
4,057,757
44,635,325
25,327,282
0.5066
37,260,760
3,469,962
4,073,072
44,803,794
22,698,997
0.4523
37,260,760
3,638,067
4,089,883
44,988,709
20,350,607
0.4039
37,260,760
3,822,599
4,108,336
45,191,694
18,252,167
0.3606
37,260,760
4,025,182
4,128,594
45,414,536
16,376,937
10
0.3220
37,260,760
4,247,601
4,150,836
45,659,197
14,701,040
307,638,93
6
r =12.00%
Fixed
55,000,000
(P)
331,717,814
Net Present Value (NPV) =NPB - NPC:
TotalCosts x Disc.Factor
-307,638,936
NPV:
24,078,878
331,717,814
Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) =NPB / NPC:
307,638,936
BCR :
1.08
134
IRR :
12.00%
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS-BENEFITS
Year
Disc.
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
TOTAL
Present Value
(n)
Factor
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3
Source N
SALES
(P)
1.0000
0.8929
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
52,418,571
0.7972
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
46,802,296
0.7118
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
41,787,764
0.6355
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
37,310,504
0.5674
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
33,312,950
0.5066
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
29,743,705
0.4523
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
26,556,880
0.4039
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
23,711,500
0.3606
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
21,170,982
0.3220
58,708,800
58,708,80
0
18,902,662
331,717,814
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Project Costs
Year
Disc.
Investments
/
Production/
Operating
Taxes &
TOTAL
Present Value
135
(n)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Manufacturin
g
(Admin/Mrktg
)
55,000,000
55,000,00
0
55,000,000
0.8929
37,260,760
3,032,340
4,029,310
48,546,75
5
43,345,317
0.7972
37,260,760
3,098,340
4,035,910
48,626,27
4
38,764,568
0.7118
37,260,760
3,167,640
4,042,840
48,709,76
9
34,670,652
0.6355
37,260,760
3,240,405
4,050,117
48,797,44
0
31,011,655
0.5674
37,260,760
3,316,808
4,057,757
48,889,49
3
27,741,212
0.5066
37,260,760
3,469,962
4,073,072
49,074,01
9
24,862,425
0.4523
37,260,760
3,638,067
4,089,883
49,276,55
8
22,290,213
0.4039
37,260,760
3,822,599
4,108,336
49,498,89
0
19,991,772
0.3606
37,260,760
4,025,182
4,128,594
49,742,97
1
17,937,814
0.3220
37,260,760
4,247,601
4,150,836
50,010,95
1
16,102,188
331,717,814
Factor
Fixed
1.0000
r =12.00%
Other
COSTS
(P)
331,717,814
Net Present Value (NPV) = NPB - NPC
TotalCosts x Disc.Factor
Costs may increase by:9.5309%
-331,717,814
NPV:
0.00
331,717,814
Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) = NPB / NPC
331,717,814
BCR :
1.00
136
12.00%
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS-COSTS
Present
Value
Year
Disc.
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
TOTAL
(n)
Factor
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3
Source N
SALES
(P)
1.0000
0.8929
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
48,613,589
0.7972
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
43,404,990
0.7118
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
38,754,456
0.6355
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
34,602,193
0.5674
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
30,894,815
0.5066
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
27,584,656
0.4523
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
24,629,157
0.4039
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
21,990,319
0.3606
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
19,634,213
10
0.3220
58,708,800
54,447,22
0
17,530,548
307,638,936
Project Co
137
Year
Disc.
(n)
Factor
Investments
/
Fixed
Production/
Operating
Taxes &
TOTAL
Manufacturin
g
(Admin/Mrktg)
Other
COSTS
Present
Value
(P)
1.0000
55,000,000
55,000,00
0
55,000,000
0.8929
37,260,760
3,032,340
4,029,310
44,322,41
0
39,573,580
0.7972
37,260,760
3,098,340
4,035,910
44,395,01
0
35,391,430
0.7118
37,260,760
3,167,640
4,042,840
44,471,24
0
31,653,750
0.6355
37,260,760
3,240,405
4,050,117
44,551,28
2
28,313,145
0.5674
37,260,760
3,316,808
4,057,757
44,635,32
5
25,327,282
0.5066
37,260,760
3,469,962
4,073,072
44,803,79
4
22,698,997
0.4523
37,260,760
3,638,067
4,089,883
44,988,70
9
20,350,607
0.4039
37,260,760
3,822,599
4,108,336
45,191,69
4
18,252,167
0.3606
37,260,760
4,025,182
4,128,594
45,414,53
6
16,376,937
10
0.3220
37,260,760
4,247,601
4,150,836
45,659,19
7
14,701,040
307,638,936
r =12.00%
Disc. Factor =
( 1 + r )-n
307,638,936
TotalSales x Disc.Factor
Present Value =
7.2588%
NPV:
307,638,936
(0.00
)
138
307,638,936
Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) =NPB / NPC:
307,638,936
BCR :
1.00
12.00%
Chapter 1
INDUSTRY AND MARKET ANALYSIS
A.
The Product
Banana chips
139
B.
Market Research
Industry data shows that traditional markets like the United States, the European
Union, Japan, Australia and South Korea have consistently expanded, although emerging
markets, particularly China and Russia and former Eastern Bloc countries have posted
exponential growth in the last four years. The most surprising market perhaps is Vietnam,
where the imports of banana chips from the Philippines has surged over the past three
years.
The annual value of banana chips exports from the Philippines is approximately $35
million, and 70-80% of the product comes from Mindanao, where cardaba bananas are
grown throughout the region. Although annual exports declined in 2005 due to traderelated issues in the China market, the market rebounded in 2006, with export volumes to
China recovering and growing by a robust 16% versus the previous year.
In 2006, Mindanao exported about $16.3 million of banana chips, or 45% of the
banana chip exports of the country. The value was 40% higher than the value in the
previous years.
During the past years, Growth for Equity in Mindanao (GEM) has helped six Mindanao
banana chip processors to join major trade fairs in China, which provided venues for the
processors to access the China market, the Philippines fastest-growing buyer of banana
chips.
These support efforts have been successful because banana chips have become an
important product for the export market. The production of banana chips has emerged as
one of Mindanaos strategic industries. There are now more than twenty banana chip
processing plants in Mindanao compared to 15 factories five years ago. However, this
number remains inadequate to fill the increasing demand.
Thousands of small banana growers depend on the chip processors as primary markets
for their produce, as the raw material needs of the banana chip industry require the yield
of at least 30,000 hectares annually. Since cardaba production is dominated by smallholder growers, with average farm size of one hectare or less, the total number of
farmers involved ranges from 30,000 to 50,000.
In the local market scenario, in Davao Region, the Department of Trade and Industry
(DTI) launched the product as a substitute for junk foods in school canteens, in an effort
to help spur local demand. The agency commissioned a private company to formulate
new banana chips variants in an attempt to encourage students to try the product
because of its nutritional value. A dozen of new varieties were successfully launched last
year. Homegrown singer Joey Ayala was hired to compose a catchy jingle to promote the
product to school children.
140
With the farmers already having direct links with the processors and other markets, and
with demand increasing steadily, banana growing has become an attractive proposition.
Banana-chip exporters, 10 of whom are considered the main exporters, have a minimum
daily requirement of 400 tons of which only 60 percent are being satisfied without this
competition.
The domestic market for fresh cardababanana is captured by middlemen who pay very
low farm gate prices. The products are either disposed in the local market or shipped to
Manila and Cebu via the ports of Cagayan de Oro City, Davao City and General Santos
City. From Manila and Cebu, fresh bananas are distributed by consignees to wholesalers
in Luzon and Visayas. The wholesalers then sell the commodities to local retail markets in
Luzon and Visayas such as fruit stands, supermarkets, wet markets and mobile retailers.
C.
STRENGTHS:
WEAKNESSES:
141
OPPORTUNITIES:
THREATS:
Public utility transport to the cities of Butuan and Davao is available 24 hours.
The fruits must be reasonably clean (fruit exhibits unavoidable dirt, latex stains
and other foreign materials incidental to proper harvesting), free from
diseases, insects, molds and other contaminants.
142
Sizes classification:
Length (cm)
Diameter (cm)
More than 14
Large
12 14
4.5
Medium
10 12
4.0
3.5
Size
Extra Large
Small
Classification- Each size shall be classified according to its general appearance, quality
and conditions as follows:
Extra Class:
Bananas in this class must be of superior quality. Hands of one variety are
mature, clean, well-formed, well-trimmed and free from decay, split fingers,
loose fingers, bruises, blemishes and discoloration caused by diseases,
insects, latex burn, mechanical or other means.
Class I:
Bananas of this class must be of good quality. Hands of one variety are
mature, clean, well-formed, well-trimmed and free from decay, split fingers,
loose fingers, bruises, blemishes and discoloration caused by diseases,
insects, latex burn, mechanical or other means.
Class II:
Bananas of this class are those which do not qualify for inclusion in the
higher class classes but satisfy the minimum requirements.Hands of one
variety are mature, reasonably clean, fairly well-formed, well-trimmed and
relatively free from decay, split fingers, loose fingers, bruises, blemishes and
discoloration caused by scars, diseases, insects and mechanical or other
means.
143
Tolerances
Extra Class:
Not more than five percent (5%) by number or weight for the off-size and no
more than five percent (5%) by number or weight for other defects are allowed
in any lot, including not more than one percent (1%) by number or weight for
hands affected by decay, provided they conform with the requirements of the
next lower class.
Class I:
Not more than ten percent (10%) by number or weight for off-size and not
more than ten percent (10%) by number or weight for other defects are
allowed in any lot, including not more than one percent (1%) by number or
weight for hands affected by decay, provided they conform with the
requirements of the next lower grade.
Class II:
Not more than twenty percent (20%) by number or weight for off-size, not more
than fifteen percent (15%) by number or weight for other defects are allowed in
any lot, including not more than two percent (2%) for hands affected by decay.
Print
Local newspapers will be tapped to promote the product and solicit support from the
populace to patronize the Kamayo Banana Chips as a nutritious snack food.
144
Broadcast
The FM and AM Radio Stations based in the locality will also be used to ensure better
penetration of the product among local consumers particularly school children.
Television
The local cable service providers will be tapped also to support massive information
campaign particularly during the initial stage of the business.
Farmers/barangay assemblies
A Project Management Staff will be required to attend during Barangay Assemblies in
order to promote the product. This is to ensure patronage to the local product and at
the same time create considerable awareness regarding the quality standards for
fresh cardaba bananas.
145
Chapter 2
BUSINESS STRUCTURE
A.
Management Team
146
OPERATIONS
MANAGER
MACHINE
OPERATORS
MARKETING
OFFICERS
CONSULTANT
FINANCE OFFICER/CASHIER
CLERK/BOOKKEEPER
DRIVER/DELIVERYMAN
QC INSPECTOR
CONTRACTORS
COMBINATION
HELPER
147
Marketing Officer Maintain a good market share of the product in both local
and foreign market. Also undertake development research activities.
Quality Control Inspectors Ensure that raw materials, production inputs,
production process and production output follow established standards.
Finance Officer/Cashier Custodian of the funds and other valuable resources
of the business.
Clerk/Bookkeeper Record all transactions of thebusiness and provide office
support services particularly to the Operations Manager.
Machine Operators Ensure optimum availability and production efficiency of
the assigned equipment. Prepare equipment operations report and perform
preventive maintenance services.
Driver/Deliveryman Provide mobility support for the efficient movement of
both raw materials and timely distribution/delivery of finished products.
Combination Helper Provide labor support at the receiving area of inputs and
raw materials, for the machine operators during machine servicing and
maintenance and housekeeping activities within the business establishment.
Contractors Provide labor support in the entire production process from
washing/peeling to loading and delivery of finished products for distribution.
B.
Business Location
The proposed business will be established in the City of Bislig within the designated
Provincial Agro-Industrial Center (PAIC). The processing facility will be located in San Vicente
I more or less 18 kilometers from Mangagoy, the central business district of Bislig City.
148
C a g u y a o
S a n V ic e n te
T u m a n a n
B u cto
S a nta C r uz
M a h a r l ik a
S a n R o q u e ( C a d a n g la s a n )
K a h ay ag
L a w ig a n
S a n F erna n d o
P o b l a c io n
B u rb o a n a n
S a n I s id r o ( B a g n a n )
L a b is m a
Co m aw a s
S a n A n t o n io
M an ga g oy
T ab o n
N
W
E
S
C.
Business Organization
149
The newly established Bislig City Integrated Coconut Processing Complex located at
the Provincial Agro-Industrial Center (PAIC), San Vicente I, Bislig City. This facility will
be one of the major supplier of cooking oil to the Banana Chips Processing Plant.
C. Business Organization
150
Its operation is clustered into regions. Bislig City as the primary beneficiary
community, is considered as one region. It is headed by a Regional Head in the
person of Mr. Roberto A. Dormendo.
The Bislig City Region is given the responsibility to handle planning and
implementation while those operating outside Bislig City handles fund sourcing
activities.
At present, aside from expanding its membership and acquiring accreditation from the
Local Government Units, the organization is involved in sourcing funds for the
Christmas Gift-Giving and the Adopt-a-School Project. Both projects are intended to
support indigent families in the City of Bislig.
151
Chapter 3
OPERATIONS PLAN
A.
Project Objectives
Generally, the project aims to provide employment opportunity to at least 2,000
displaced workers of PICOP Resources Incorporated (PRI) and other unemployed
people of Bislig City.
Specifically, it aims to:
B.
Establish 1 banana chip processing plant for the value-adding of the existing
banana product which is abundant in Bislig City;
Activities
May 2010
152
C.
Value-Adding Activities
The present practice of banana farmers is to sell their produce as fresh bananas to the local
buyers or traders. However, with the advent of the proposed business entity, no fresh
bananas will get out from Surigao del Sur. Instead, it will be traded in the form of chips.
Based on the computations made, every metric ton of fresh banana processed into chips can
generate an added value of PhP14,000.00
Figure 1 shows the Process Flow of banana processing. Figure 2 on the other hand shows
the proposed Plant Lay Out.
Fig. 1 Process Flow Chart
SORTING/
WEIGHING
WASHING
PEELING
WASHING
CHIPPING
WASHING/
DEWATERING
FIRST
FRYING
SECOND
FRYING
PACKAGING
STORING/
MARKETING
153
OFFICE AREA
CONTINUOUS FRYER
154
D.
Resource Allocation
For the smooth and sustainable implementation of the business, following resources are
necessary:
1.
2.
3.
Human Resource
Land Resource
Budget Allocation
Loan/Investment PhP38,500,000.00 representing cost of the processing house and
equipment.
Proponent Equity-PhP12,098,000.00
Equity-PhP12,098,000.00 representing cost of land and site development,
water facility, ingredients, acquisition of delivery van, office equipments, cost of
training and working capital.
155
Chapter 4
FINANCIAL PLAN
A.
Position/Designation
Monthly
Salary (P)
Project Manager
No. of
Personnel
Annual Labor
Cost (P)
25,000
300,000
Monthly
Salary (P)
No. of
Personnel
Annual Labor
Cost (P)
Cashier
10,000
120,000
QC Inspector
15,000
180,000
Clerk/Bookkeeper
7,000
84,000
Driver/Deliveryman
9,000
108,000
Machine Operator
8,000
288,000
Combination Helper
5,000
120,000
Piece Rate
44
1,860,320*
Labor
Position/Designation
Contractors
Assumed that each contractual worker can render a total of 302 working days per
year with an average daily earning of P140.00.
156
Consultants
Monthly
Position/Designation
Consultant
Salary (P)
No. of
Personnel
Annual Labor
Cost (P)
10,000
120,000
Purpose
Land acquisition and project site development broken
down as follows:
PhP1,000,000.00
Land acquisition
Site development
PhP300,000.00
PhP500,000.00
PhP500,000.00
PhP500,000.00
PhP39,600,000.00
PhP5,144,000.00
PhP8,456,000.00
157
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 10
58,708,800.0
0
58,708,800.00
58,708,800.00
58,708,800.00
10,056,000.00
10,056,000.00
10,056,000.00
37,260,760.00
37,260,760.00
37,260,760.00
21,448,040.00
21,448,040.00
21,448,040.00
10,056,000.0
0
37,260,760.0
0
21,448,040.0
0
1,809,240.00
1,875,240.00
1,944,540.00
3,024,501.3
5
1,223,100.00
1,223,100.00
1,223,100.00
3,032,340.00
3,098,340.00
3,167,640.00
18,415,700.00
18,349,700.00
18,280,400.00
1,226,500.26
1,226,500.26
1,226,500.26
17,189,199.74
17,123,199.74
17,053,899.74
2,877,278.00
2,862,758.00
2,847,512.00
Depreciation
NET INCOME
(NI = IncBT - Tx)
4,304,400.00
4,304,400.00
4,304,400.00
10,007,521.74
9,956,041.74
9,901,987.74
4,003,008.70
3,982,416.70
3,960,795.10
6,004,513.05
5,973,625.05
5,941,192.65
OPERATING EXPENSES
o All Administrative Costs
1,223,100.0
0
4,247,601.3
5
17,200,438.6
5
1,226,500.2
6
15,973,938.3
9
2,609,920.5
0
4,304,400.0
0
9,059,617.8
9
3,623,847.1
6
5,435,770.7
3
158
Cash Inflow/
Outflow Items
Pre-Imp
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 10
INFLOWS
Cash Sales/Revenues
58,708,800
58,708,800
58,708,800
58,708,800
Loan/Investment
38,500,000
FOBI
12,098,000
4,402,000
55,000,000
58,708,800
58,708,800
58,708,800
58,708,800
44,044,000
300,000
10,056,000
37,260,760
37,260,760
37,260,760
37,260,760
Operating/Administrative/Marketin
g
300,000
3,032,340
3,098,340
3,167,640
4,247,601
Contingencies/Miscellaneous
300,000
4,029,310
4,035,910
4,042,840
4,150,836
55,000,000
44,322,410
44,395,010
44,471,240
45,659,197
14,386,390
14,313,790
14,237,560
13,049,603
6,813,890
6,813,890
6,813,890
6,813,890
2,877,278
2,862,758
2,847,512
2,609,921
4,695,222
4,637,142
4,576,158
3,625,792
4,695,222
9,332,363
18,420,646
4,695,222
9,332,363
13,908,521
22,046,437
Farmers
Total Inflows
OUTFLOWS
Fixed Investments
Venture Initiation
Permits/Licenses/Clearances
Manufacturing/Production
Other Costs
Total Outflows
Sub-Total
E.
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
Investment Summary
159
Land
Unit of
Issue
hectare
Unit
Cost
500,000
Site development
hectare
Water system
Particulars
Usage
Amount
500,000
500,000
500,000
unit
500,000
500,000
Processing house
unit
10,000,000
10,000,000
Weighing scale
unit
25,000
50,000
Cooling system
unit
75,000
300,000
Overhead crane
unit
250,000
500,000
unit
150,000
150,000
Input warehouse
unit
500,000
500,000
unit
2,000,000
2,000,000
unit
250,000
750,000
unit
10,000,000
20,000,000
unit
250,000
500,000
unit
5,000,000
5,000,000
unit
250,000
250,000
unit
250,000
250,000
Delivery van
unit
1,000,000
2,000,000
850
200
170,000
Crates
piece
Office equipments
set
100,000
100,000
Tools
set
6,000
24,000
barrel
15,000
20
300,000
Supplies
rolls
5,000
104
520,000
Other ingredients
liter
300
500
150,000
month
25,000
150,000
tons
7,000
1,208
8,456,000
month
80,000
480,000
session
15,000
20
300,000
document
100,000
300,000
Cooking oil
Utilities
Working capital
Labor
Training and development
Fees/Licenses
160
month
50,000
Total
F.
300,000
55,000,000
Financing Scheme
Particulars
LOAN/
FOBI
Farmers
Total
Investment
Land
500,000
500,000
Site development
500,000
500,000
Water system
500,000
500,000
8,950,000
1,050,000
10,000,000
Weighing scale
50,000
50,000
Cooling system
300,000
300,000
Overhead crane
500,000
500,000
150,000
150,000
Input warehouse
500,000
500,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
750,000
750,000
20,000,000
20,000,000
500,000
500,000
5,000,000
5,000,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
Transport vehicle
2,000,000
2,000,000
Crates
170,000
170,000
Office equipments
100,000
100,000
Tools
24,000
24,000
Cooking oil
300,000
300,000
Processing house
161
Supplies
520,000
520,000
Other ingredients
150,000
150,000
Utilities
150,000
150,000
Working capital
4,228,000
4,228,000
8,456,000
Labor
480,000
480,000
126,000
174,000
300,000
Fees/Licenses
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
38,500,000
12,098,000
4,402,000
55,000,000
70.00
22.00
8.00
100.00
Total
Percentage
162
ATTACHMENTS
Schedules
Schedule of Processing-Volume in MT
Year
Sorting/
Washing
Peeling
Slicing
First fry
Second
fry
Recovery
pegged at
45% based
Recovery
pegged at
90% based
Recovery
pegged at
50% based
Assumed
that no
shrinkage
163
on procured
fresh
bananas by
volume or
weight
on peeled
bananas by
volume or
weight
on sliced
bananas
by volume
or weight
due to
added
ingredients
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
10
2,416
1,087
978
489
489
Total
24,160
10,872
9,785
4,892
4,892
Schedule of Production
50 grams
pack
30 percent
2,935,440
75 grams
pack
30 percent
1,956,960
100 grams
pack
20 percent
978,480
125 grams
pack
20 percent
782,784
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
Year
164
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
10
2,935,440
1,956,960
978,480
782,784
Total
29,354,400
19,569,600
9,784,800
7,827,840
50 grams
PhP6/pack
75 grams
PhP9/pack
100 grams
PhP12/pack
125 grams
PhP15/pack
Total
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
10
17,612,640
17,612,640
11,741,760
11,741,760
58,708,800
Total
176,126,400
176,126,400
117,417,600
117,417,600
587,088,000
Schedule of Depreciation
165
Acquisition
Cost
500,000
No. of
Units
1
500,000
Estimated
Life - years
10
Annual
Depreciation
50,000
10,000,000
10,000,000
10
1,000,000
Weighing scale
25,000
50,000
10
5,000
Cooling system
75,000
300,000
10
30,000
Overhead crane
250,000
500,000
10
50,000
150,000
150,000
10
15,000
Input warehouse
500,000
500,000
10
50,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
10
200,000
250,000
750,000
10
75,000
10,000,000
20,000,000
10
2,000,000
250,000
500,000
10
50,000
5,000,000
5,000,000
10
500,000
Water de-hydrator
machine
250,000
250,000
10
25,000
250,000
250,000
10
25,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
10
200,000
850
200
170,000
10
17,000
100,000
100,000
10
10,000
6,000
24,000
10
2,400
Description
Water system
Processing house
Delivery van
Crates
Office equipments
Tools
Total
30,606,850
Amount
43,044,000
4,304,400
PhP38,500,000.00
Interest
Maturity
10 years
166
Amortization
Period
Principal
Interest
Amt Due
Balance
2,193,890
4,620,000
6,813,890
36,306,110
2,457,157
4,356,733
6,813,890
33,848,953
2,752,016
4,061,874
6,813,890
31,096,937
3,082,258
3,731,632
6,813,890
28,014,679
3,452,129
3,361,761
6,813,890
24,562,550
3,866,384
2,947,506
6,813,890
20,696,165
4,330,350
2,483,540
6,813,890
16,365,815
4,849,993
1,963,898
6,813,890
11,515,822
5,431,992
1,381,899
6,813,890
6,083,831
10
6,083,831
730,060
6,813,890
Total
38,500,000
29,638,903
68,138,903
Regular
Employee
Contractors/
Farmers
Annual
Payroll
Withholding
Tax
Business
Tax
10
644
3,322,260
332,226
2,877,278
10
744
3,322,260
332,226
2,862,758
10
844
3,322,260
332,226
2,847,512
10
944
3,322,260
332,226
2,831,504
10
1,044
3,322,260
332,226
2,814,695
10
1,044
3,322,260
332,226
2,781,001
10
1,044
3,322,260
332,226
2,744,018
10
1,044
3,322,260
332,226
2,703,421
167
10
1,044
3,322,260
332,226
2,658,853
10
10
1,044
3,322,260
332,226
2,609,921
33,222,600
3,322,260
27,730,961
Total
168
ANNEX K
POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS MATRIX9
ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVE
STEPS
PERSONS/BODY
RESPONSIBLE
1. Motuproprio or
collaborative
review of policy
issues related to
the components
or agencys
convergence
programs or
activities
-Armchair review of
issues using empirical
inputs from the field or
discussions of the NCI
component/agency
-NCI Proponent
Component/WG
-NCI Proponent
Agency/OGA
2.1 Formulation or
amendment of the
proposed policy
instrument
-Prepare working
draft of policy
instrument
-Drafting/formulation
of policy instrument
-Draft explanatory
notes on the policy
instrument
2.2 Crafting of
Policy Issue Fact
Sheet detailing the
policy issue and
other attendant
INSTRUMENT/
FORMS
NEEDED
Data inputs
TIME FRAME
2 weeks
depending
on the
scope of
policy to be
covered
-Research/data
gathering on the policy
issue
-Drafting of policy
-NCI Proponent
Component
/WG
-NCI Proponent
Agency /OGA
-NCI Proponent
Component
/WG
-NCI Proponent
-Draft NCI
Joint
Administrativ
e Order (AO)
or
Memorandum
Circular (MC)
-Fact Sheet of
Policy Issue
for Resolution
4 to 6 weeks
4 to 6 weeks
facts
3.Endorsement of
draft policy
instrument or
policy issue fact
sheet to Policy and
Advocacy
Component/Workin
g Group (PAG)
Agency/OGA
NCI National
Focal Person
(NCI-NFP)
-As stated
NCI Secretariat
-Within 3
days from
receipt of
draft policy
instrument
or policy
issue fact
sheet from
proponent
NCI
component/
WG or NCI
4.Conduct initial
discussions,
refinement of the
draft instrument or
the preparation of
recommendations
on the resolution
of a policy issue
and Advocacy
Working Group (PAG)
Chair for processing
under the NCI
institutionalized
Policy Development
process
To assist the NCI
proponent
component/WG/agen
cy in ensuring the
correctness of facts
supporting the draft
policy instrument or
policy issue fact
sheet and
recommendations
prior to submission
of the same to the
NCI-Policy
Development
Committee (NCI-PDC)
agency
-Upon receipt of a
proposed policy
instrument or policy
issue Fact Sheet from
the NCI-NFP, the PAG
shall coordinate with
the Proponent for
initial discussions,
refinement of the draft
instrument or the
preparation of
recommendationson
the resolution of a
policy issue
-Revision of draft
policy instrument or
policy issue fact sheet
or further research if
necessary
-Review of the
Proponents revised
draft by the PAG
PAG and
Proponent
-PAG CSW
memorandum
to the NCIPDC
endorsing the
draft policy
instrument or
policy issue
fact sheet
and
recommenddations for
consideration
Within 3
weeks from
receipt of
transmittal
from the
NCI-NFP
-Proponent
-Revised draft
policy
instrument or
policy issue
fact sheet
-Revised
draft to be
re-submitted
by the
proponent to
the PAG
within 2 to
4 weeks
depending
-PAG
5.Deliberation and
consideration of
the draft NCI policy
instrument or
policy issue fact
sheet by the NCI
Policy
Development
Committee (NCI
PDC)
-Calendarthe draft
policy instrument or
policy issue for
deliberation and
consideration by the
NCI Policy
Development
Committee (NCI PDC)
-Coordinate the
technical and
administrative
requirements for the
NCI-PDC meetings
such as ensuring the
correctness of the
subject document
based on initial
consideration of the
-PAG
-PAG
on the
extent of
revision or
further
research to
be
undertaken
-Within 1
week from
resubmission
of revised
policy
instrument/f
act sheet
Immediately
after
submission
of CSW to
the NCI-PDC
Within 7
days from
the
submission
of the CSW
to the NCIPDC
-NCI-PDC
-Proponent and
PAG
-Within 10
days from
transmittal
of CSW by
the PAG
-During the
NCI-PDF
meeting
-NCI-PDC
6.Conduct of
To obtain comments,
-Sponsorship and
defense of draft policy
instrument or policy
issue fact sheet/
recommendations
before the NCI-PDC
during deliberations
-If deemed necessary,
the NCI-PDC shall call
for the conduct of
consultative
fora with stakeholders/
institutions/fieldmen/
OGAs
-Calendar and
coordinate the conduct
of the consultative fora
-Conduct of
During the
NCI-PDF
meeting
-PAG in
coordination
with the
Proponent
-NCI-
Within two
weeks from
the NCI-PDF
meeting
consultative fora
7. Endorsement of
policy instruments
and Resolutions to
policy issues for
consideration by
the NCI National
Steering
Committee (NCINSC)
recommendations
and perspectives of
stakeholders, the
NCI Regional
(RCI)/Provincial
(PCI)/Municipal (MCI)
Technical Working
Groups, concerned
institutions, and
expertson proposed
policies or
amendments to
policy with the end
view of ensuring an
eclectic approach to
resolving contentious
or critical policy
issues
Passage of policy
instruments or
Resolutions
necessary to the
operationalization
and implementation
of programs under
the National
Convergence
Initiative
consultative fora
PDC/PAG/Propo
nent
-Revision of policy
instruments or
preparation of
recommendation on
policy issues for
resolution
-Further meetings on
the revised policy
instruments or
recommendations to
policy issues subject of
resolution
-Proponent/PAG
-NSC-NFP
Two to three
days from
passage by
the NCI-PDC
-PAG Chair
One week
-NCI-PDC
8.Consideration
and passage by
the NCI-National
Steering
Committee (NCINSC) of policy
instruments or
Policy Resolutions
Passage of
Administrative
Orders/Memorandum
Circulars/Policy
Resolutions required
in the
operationalizaton
and implementation
of programs and
projects under the
National
Convergence
Initiative
from
endorsemen
t of the
policy
instrument/r
esolution by
the NCI-PDC
-NCI National
Steering
Committee
-NCI
PDC/Proponent/
PAG
Ten days
from NCINSC
approval
-PAG/Proponent
NCI-NFP/NCI
Secretariat
Three days
from
submission
by PAG and
Proponent
of finalized
policy
instrument/r
esolution
ANNEX L
PROCESS FLOW FOR CAPABILITY DEVELOMENT COMPONENT
Phase 1: Strengthen partnership and/or establish new networks with relevant stakeholders in CI sites
ACTIVITY
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS
TIME-FRAME
Conduct consultation
meetings to establish
partnership and refine the
process of capability
development activities in
CI sites
3rdQtr2011onwards
(continuing)
a. RCI TWG
b. PCI TWG
c. MCI TWG
RESOURCES
NEEDED
Food, supplies
and other
incidentals
Conduct coordination
meetings
Determine presence
and/or extent of
capdev assistance
extended
RESPONSIBLE
PERSON
OUTPUT
Coordination meetings
established/
commenced
Draft list of areas of
cooperation on capacity
development identified/
prepared
August, 2011
onwards
(continuing)
Phase 2:Conduct training needs /capability building needs of stakeholders and partners
ACTIVITY
IMPLEMENTATION STEPS
TIME-FRAME
RESOURCES
NEEDED
RESPONSIBLE
PERSON
OUTPUT
TNA
Conduct rapid appraisal of
training needs/felt needs of
partners and stakeholders
in CI sites
July, 2011
onwards
Rapid appraisal of
training needs
conducted
Food and
accommodation
Per diems
August, 2011
onwards
-do-
September,
2011 onwards
Proposed list of
training programs
prepared
Food, transpo
Supplies and
other incidentals
Agreed upon /
final course design for
training program to be
implemented
Course design /
training proposal
prepared
target participants
Research on appropriate
methods, SLEs, and RPs to
be tapped
PRE-IMPLEMENTATION
Finalization of training
program
Finalization of all
administrative arrangements
(budget, venue, participants,
presentations of RPs, etc.)
Preparation of necessary
communications (resource
persons, admin
arrangements, etc.)
Preparation of handouts,
forms, etc.
September,
2011 onwards
Supplies and
other incidentals
Final program
prepared
Administrative
arrangements finalized
Needed
communications and
invitation letters
farmed-out
Training forms
prepared
(participants profile,
resource persons
profile, evaluation
forms
October, 2011
onwards
(refer to list of
budgetary
requirements)
Training program
conducted
Supplies and
other incidentals
MAJOR ACTIVITIES
MILESTONES/INDICAT
ORS
RESPONSIBLE
BODY
COOPERATING
BODIES
2011
1st
Qtr.
Convergence Capacity
Development Framework
Documentation of best
innovative practices
available
Competency Resource
Profile of each agency
List or Inventory of
Expertise for RPs
-do-
Curriculum development/
training cycle
(TNA, module
development. etc.)
Toolkits, manuals
-do-
Conduct of training,
coaching, advisory
services, convergence
interventions at the local
level
Partnership development
at national, regional, local
level
(partnership mapping,
stakeholder analysis with
local partners)
Note:
Customized learning
packages
E-learning and Distance
Learning Courses
Documentation of
partnership experiences
NCI Secretariat
DA ATI
DAR BARIE
DENR-FMB
HRD-DA
BARIE/BARBD
DENR-HRDS
-do-
2ndQtr
3rdQt
r
4thQtr
ANNEX M
INDICATIVE LIST OF PROPOSED TRAINING PROGRAMS
TITLE
1. Business Proposal Writing
Market Demand Identification
Financial Management
Financial and Economic Analysis for LGUs
Training on Upland Agroforestry
Orientation on Sustainable Upland
Development
7. Integrated Ecosystem Management (IEM)
The Ridge to Reef Approach
8. Climate Change
9. Integrated Ecosystem Management
10. Training on Eco-Tourism for Protected
Area Superintendents (PASUs) and
Protected Area (PA) Staff
11. Strengthening Organic Farming
12. Commodity Marketing/Trading
13. Community Organizing and Networking
14. Resource Mobilization and Enterprise
Development
15. Re-orientation on the Local Government
Code for LGUs and POs (RA 7160)
OBJECTIVE
How to access financing
objective is or are
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
TARGET PAX
DURATION
protection
ANNEX N
TRAINING CYCLE
The cycle has four distinct stages: training needs analysis, training design, training implementation,
and training evaluation. These stages have to be viewed in their entirety, not as a series of isolated
activities. The outcome of one stage provides the inputs for the next stage, and the absence of any
stage would undermine the validity of the whole process.
The cycle starts with a needs analysis and returns back to another needs analysis in its attempt to
respond to the dynamic demands of the organization as shown in below.
Training design. This includes the following activities: formulation of training title, objectives,
designing the training module, development of training materials and session guides and
arrangement for training delivery.
For a TNA-based course design to be meaningful, learning activities should be given more
emphasis that will ultimately lead the participants into mastering the concepts and skills
defined in the course learning outcomes. Such learning activities should also prepare the
participants for subsequent assessments. The learning activities should be interactive and
provide the participants with opportunities to deepen their understanding; explicitly teach
participants on how each learning activity relates to a specific learning outcome to help them
recognize the rationale for the activity consistent with the course design.
Training Implementation This involves the effective delivery of the formulated training plan.
This is the stage when the trainer should be able to manage the dynamics of the group, and
see to it that training content is communicated to and shared clearly with the participants. In
this stage, all arrangements and preparations prior to the conduct of the training,
requirements during the training, and after the completion of the training are attended to.
The best interventions mirror the learning activities that the participants have participated in
throughout the training course. It should offer participants the opportunity to demonstrate,
and further develop their knowledge and skills. Informative assessments should present
valuable feedback to improve, and align each component of the course designs.
Annex N1:
DEVELOPING A TRAINING PROGRAM
Phase I: Conceptualization
-
Preparing the training design. A training design is the detailed outline of the program
objectives, training curriculum, evaluation scheme and other administrative concerns in
implementing a training program. This include (a) selection and/or recruitment of participants;
(b) curriculum development stating the objectives, methodologies and content; and (c) setting
up the mechanics for organizing the training
o
o
Duration how long will the training be, time devoted for each topic, workshop, etc.
Venue where the training sessions be held, accessibility to participants, availability
of seminar facilities (whiteboard, chairs, tables, workshop areas, sound system,
ventilation, lighting, etc.
Funding or the financial arrangements
Administrative arrangements who will act as the secretariat, in-charge of board and
lodging if live-in, transportation, coordination with agencies regarding field visits, if
any, communications and other related correspondences, supplies and materials,
training forms, handouts, etc.
Documentation and evaluation scheme how it will be carried out
Resource speakers
This involves the actual conduct of the training including its pre and post training activities
a. Pre-training
1) Finalization of training program, venue, invitation of participants and resource
speakers, board and lodging, transpo, etc.
2) Preparation of needed handouts, forms, etc.
b. Actual implementation
1)
2)
3)
4)
5) Documentation of proceedings
c. Post-Training Activities
1) Preparation/finalization of training documentation
2) Closure of financial transactions and other administrative concerns
Phase IV: Program Evaluation
1) Preparation/submission of training evaluation report.
2) Documentation of feedback and recommendations
Annex N.2:
TYPE
WORKSHOP
LECTUREDISCUSSION
LECTURESYNTHESIS
CASE STUDIES
SIMULATION
DISADVANTAGES
Time consuming if
moderator cannot
effectively handle the
group
Requires intensive
preparation prior to
training
Suitable case
materials are not
always available
Close supervision
and careful study are
required. Simulation
exercises have to be
them out.
GROUP DYNAMICS
PANEL
DISCUSSION
INDIVIDUAL/GROU
P PROJECTS
FIELD VISITS
AUDIO-VISUAL
TEACHING
PLENARY
SESSIONS
Structured exercises
meant to evoke
certain group
processes are
interspersed in the
discussions to stress
some points .
These are also used
for team-building
sessions
Speakers from
different
sectors/groups are
asked to give their
opinion on certain
topics which the
trainees can react
afterwards
The trainees are
asked to make
certain projects
related to particular
skills either as
individuals or as a
group (e.g. project
proposals, collage,
etc.)
The trainees are
divided into groups
and fielded to
different areas to
observe according to
certain guidelines
Slides, films, posters
or other forms of
creative literature
relevant to the
content are
presented
Conclusions,
recommendations
and questions are
generated regarding
developed to suit
target groups.
The exercises have
to be suited to the
course objectives
and the trainees
characteristics. It
should also be
pertinent to a
particular situation
Varied views on
certain topics are
discussed to as to
give the participants
a wider perspective
on the subject
matter.
Speakers have to be
properly briefed on
the objective and
expected content of
their session.
It requires adequate
and clear guidelines
and supervision by
the staff
Field arrangements
have to be wellcoordinated. The
observation
guidelines should be
clear to the trainees
The materials have
to be selected in
advanced.
Adequate time
should be provided.
Repetitions should
be avoided unless
DEMONSTRATION
ideas presented
within a specified
period of time. (i.e.
modules
Actual presentation
of a technique by the
resource person or
the participants.
terms of connecting
one topic/part to
another.
called for.
Experiential; the
participants actually
sees the method
Annex N. 3
CHECKLIST IN IMPLEMENTING TRAINING PROGRAMS / ACTIVITIES
Title of Training:
_________________________________________________________________________
Date of Implementation: ______________________________________________________
I. PRE-IMPLEMENTATION
ACTIVITY
Meeting with organizing office to discuss the training program
(title, objectives, topics, participants, funding, etc.)
(identify criteria in the selection of participants)
REMARKS
II. IMPLEMENTATION
ACTIVITY
REMARKS
REMARKS
Particulars
FORMS
Participants Profile
Resource Persons Profile
Post Course Evaluation
Resource Persons Evaluation
Attendance Sheets
Directory (hard and electronic copy)
Cue cards / Time Mgt. Cards
Mood Barometer
Expectations Check cards
House Rules
SUPPLIES
Expanding Envelopes / Training Kits
Bond Paper A4
Staples ( heavy duty stapler - for manuals)
Xerox powder (for repro. of handouts)
White board marker (12) black, blue, red
Pentel pens ( 1 box)
Board eraser
Ballpens
Manila paper
Cartolina (assorted) / meta cards
ID holder
Masking Tape (wide)
Tape Dispenser
Stapler and staple wire
Staple remover
Scissors
Cutter
Pencils
Computer ink (B & W, colored)
Status
Annex N.5
SAMPLE BUDGET ESTIMATE
TITLE:
______________________________________________________
DURATION:
______________________________________________________
VENUE:
______________________________________________________
NO. OF PAX:
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
STAFF:
I.
TRAVELLING EXPENSES
Pax
Way
Pax
Trip = __________
RP
Way
RP
Trip = __________
Staff
Way
Staff
Trip = __________
Sub Total
II.
= __________
/Day/Person
x Days
Staff
/Day/Person
= ________________
x
x Days
RP
/Day/Person
x Days
Pax
Persons
= ________________
Persons
= ________________
Sub Total
III.
= ________________
PER DIEM
Pax
/Day/Person
Persons
x Days
Staff
= __________
/Day/Person
Persons
x Days
RP
= ___________
/Day/Person
Persons
x days
= ___________
Sub Total =
IV.
____________
HONORARIUM
RP
/ Hour
Hour
= _________________
Sub Total
V.
/Day/Person
Pax
x Days
VI.
= _________________
= __________________
Sub Total
= __________________
Sub Total
= __________________
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL:
__________________________________________________
Annex N.6
TRAINING FORMS
PARTICIPANTS PROFILE
Last Name
Date of Birth
First Name
Place of Birth
Present Position
Sex
M.I.
Nickname
Age
Civil Status
Designation
Place of Assignment
Telefax:
Mobile No.
Bachelors Degree
Name of School
Year Graduated
Masters
Name of School
Year Graduated
Name of School
Year Graduated
Doctorate
Name of School
Year Graduated
Educational Attainment
Duties and
Responsibilities
1.
2.
3.
Related Training
Programs Attended for the
last three (3) years
1.
2.
3.
Signature: ______________________________
Date: _________________________
First Name
Place of Birth
Present Position
Sex
M.I.
Nickname
Age
Civil Status
Designation
Place of Assignment
Telefax:
Mobile No.
Educational Attainment
Bachelors Degree
Name of School
Year Graduated
Masters
Name of School
Year Graduated
Doctorate
Name of School
Year Graduated
Name of School
Year Graduated
Areas of Specialization
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Other related information
1.
2.
Signature: ______________________________
Date: _________________________
EXCELLENT
VERY
SATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
CAN BE
IMPROVED
POOR
B. Comment on the relevance and value of the subject matter to your position.
1. [ ] Very relevant and valuable
2. [ ] Slightly relevant and valuable
3. [ ] Less relevant and valuable
The subject matter would have been more relevant and valuable to me if:
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
______
C. In general, what are the weaknesses in the presentation/discussion of the subject matter?
________________________________________________________________________________
___
D. Comments/recommendations. How would you like the topic to be discussed/presented in the
future?
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
______
___________________________________
NAME OFPARTICIPANT
(optional)
1.
How would you rate the quality of this training in terms of:
Excellent
Above Ave.
Average
Below Ave.
Poor
b.
Process (Methodologies,
____________ ____________ _____________
____________
Procedures)
c. Duration and Schedule
____________ ____________ _____________
____________
of the Course
Comments:
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_________
2.
3.
Learning Methodology/Aid
Usefulness
Very
Useful
a. Lecture
Useful
UsefulUseful
Somewhat
Not
Applicable
b. Class discussion/participation
4.
d. Case Analysis
e. Practicum
f. Workshop
g. Visual Aids
h. Hand Outs
How did you find the time allocated for each topic?
Sufficient ___________
______________
5.
Insufficient
Good
Poor
a. Seating arrangement
b. Lighting
c. Sound System
d. Ventilation/air-conditioning
e. Food
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
______
6.
How would you rate the training staff in managing the training?
Excellent ______
Poor
7.
Satisfactory ________
Fair ______
Comments:
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_________
Name: _______________________________
Date:
Annex N. 7
1. Rationale
2. Objectives
a. General
b. Specific
3. Participants
4. Course Outline / Topics
5. Methodology
6. Participants
7. Resource Persons
8. Date and Venue
9. Budgetary Requirements
ANNEX N. 8
1. Executive Summary
2. Introduction (cite rationale and objectives)
3. Participants
4. Highlights
a. Opening Program
b. Training Proper
c. Presentations
d. Field Visit / Practicum, if any
e. Closing Program
5. Issues Raised / How it was resolved / Clarifications
6. Result of Evaluation
7. Findings
8. Recommendations
9. Conclusion
10.
Photo Documentation
ANNEX O
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT MATRIX
ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVES
PERSON
TOOLS/FORMS
RESPONSIBLE
NEEDED
Function: To ensure the NCI programs, projects and initiatives are implemented and monitored in an efficient and effective manner.
ensure that innovations are documented, shared and disseminated for possible adoption, expansion and scaling-up.
Manage NCI
To facilitate the
1. Identify Data /Information
KM Group in
List of NCIs Programs/
Database
development
and
Needed
coordination
with
Projects and Locations
Step by Step Process
2.
Data
Gathering
Methods
management of
Other NCI TWG and Questions,
Matrix
Identify methods for other relevant
NCI Database
Survey Forms
data gathering
System
agencies
Prepare plan for
Any RDBMS (Oracle, My
data gathering
SQL)
Design
questionnaires/form
s
Interview/D
isseminate
survey and
report
forms
Collect/consolidate
Processed data
Knowledge Management Component
STEPS
TIME
FRAME (SPECIFY)
It will likewise
1 month
3 months
6months
ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVES
STEPS
PERSON
RESPONSIBLE
TOOLS/FORMS
NEEDED
TIME
FRAME (SPECIFY)
programs.
4. Database Build-up
Training/Orientation and
Encode information from
the Survey forms
5.
3months
(depending on the
volume of data)
Report Generation
6. Database Maintenance
Updating/Modification
Information
Dissemination
To ensure the
sharing and
circulation of
information.
Packaging Information
Materials
(Content
, Target Audience)
Identify Dissemination
Methods
Quarterly/as need
arises
KM in Coordination
with DENR PAO,
DAR-PAS
DAR-BARIE
DA-AFIS
NCI Secretariat
Newsletter
Website
Press Release
(Tri Media)
Flyers/Brochures
Cluster Meeting
Conference
Presentation
Posters
Workshops
Demonstrations
On-line
discussion
Journal Articles
Reports and
other Documents
3 months
ACTIVITIES
Monitoring and
Evaluation
Documentation
of Innovations
and best
practices
OBJECTIVES
To improve
performance and
determine the
relevance,
effectiveness and
impact of the
project.
To identify the
innovations and
best practices for
adoption,
expansion and
development of the
projects/programs.
STEPS
PERSON
RESPONSIBLE
KM Group in
coordination with
Other NCI TWG and
other relevant
agencies
KM Group in
coordination with
Policy and
Advocacy.
component
TOOLS/FORMS
NEEDED
M& E Forms
SWOT Analysis Tool
SMART Tool
Logframe
KM/CAPDEV
TIME
FRAME (SPECIFY)
6months to 1 year
3months
Forms
Annual
ANNEX P
MONITORING AND EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Proposed M&E Template
Project Name
:
__________________________
Implementing Agency: __________________________
Project Description :
__________________________
Budget Allocation:
__________________________
Goal/General Objective :_____________________________________________________________________________
Input
Output
Targets
Budg
Accomplishments
Budg External Factors
Objectives/Activ Indicat Indicat
et
et
/ Remarks
ities
ors
ors
(P00
(P00
0)
0)
1stQ 2nd 3rd 4thQ
1st
2nd 3rdQ 4th
tr
Qtr Qt tr
Qtr Qtr tr
Qtr
r
Objective 1
Activity 1.1
Activity 1.2
Activity 1.3
Objective 2
Activity 2.1
Activity 2.2
Activity 2.3
Fill-up Instructions
(Proposed M&E template)
Heading:
1.
Write down the Name of the Project, Project Description, Goal of the Project, Implementing Agency and the Budget Allocated
or Requested for the Project.
M & E Template
A. Setting up the Target
1.
2.
3.
4.
List down the specific objectives and the activities that correspond to it. (Column 1)
Set the input indicators needed. (Column 2)
Set the output indicators for each activity. (Column 3)
Indicate the Budget allocated for each activity. (Column 4)
Write down the actual figure of the given output indicator per activity.
C. External Factors/Remarks
External factors are the important events, conditions or decisions which are necessarily outside the control of the
project, but which must remain favorable for the project objective to be attained. Remarks are comments, observations or
explanations that hinder in the accomplishment of the project.
Annex Q
GUIDE IN FORMULATING THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK
Project Title:
Implementing Agency:
Sponsor:
Budget Allocated/Requested:
Narrative Summary
Goal:
Purpose:
Project Outputs:
Activities:
Inputs:
Means of Verification
(MOV)
Assumptions
Fill-up Instructions:
Goal:
The goal statement is the context of the project intervention. Your project will contribute to the achievement of this Goal.
Purpose:
The purpose is the statement of the end objective of the project. This is stated in terms of what the target group (the primary
beneficiary) can do after the project. This statement is the guiding post of your project interventions.
Project Outputs:
The output is the statement of the deliverables of the project. This is stated in terms of what the implementer will be delivering during
the project. This statement is the project intervention to achieve the project purpose.
Inputs:
The input is the statement of the resources that will be provided for the project in order to produce the project output. This is stated in
terms of what the implementer will be given during the project.
Assumptions
The statement of risks that may have a bearing on the:
REFERENCES:
Joint Memorandum Circular No. 01, Series of 2010 on Policy Framework for
the Enhanced National convergence Initiatives among DA-DAR-DENR
Joint Memorandum Circular No. 01, Series of 2006 Adopting the Guide for
Implementation in DA-DAR-DENR Convergence Initiatives Towards
Sustainable Rural Development
Policy Framework and Implementing Strategy for the Enhanced DA-DARDENR Convergence Initiative for Sustainable Rural Development
DAR Memorandum Circular No. 13 Series 2009 Operational Directives for the
Development of ARC Clusters